﻿<s>
I_PPIS1 have_VH0 argued_VVN against_II population_NN1 uniqueness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 have_VH0 seen_VVN that_CST in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO the_AT structuring_NN1 role_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 prima_JJ21 facie_JJ22 assumption_NN1 could_VM in_II principle_NN1 be_VBI defeated_VVN ,_, and_CC the_AT analogy_NN1 with_IW disjunctive_JJ universals_NN2 indicates_VVZ what_DDQ could_VM count_VVI as_II a_AT1 suitable_JJ defeater_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 want_VV0 to_TO critically_RR analyze_VVI Devitt_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 defense_NN1 of_IO realism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC (_( 19_MC )_) expresses_VVZ a_AT1 quantification_NN1 over_II all_DB things_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG its_APPGE defeat_NN1 in_II Vietnam_NP1 in_II 1975_MC ,_, and_CC recognising_VVG the_AT widespread_JJ hostility_NN1 to_II the_AT war_NN1 at_II home_NN1 ,_, the_AT Australian_JJ ruling_JJ class_NN1 pulled_VVD back_RP from_II its_APPGE more_RGR ambitious_JJ interventions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Vera_NP1 contested_VVD dominant_JJ notions_NN2 of_IO womanhood_NN1 ,_, and_CC discovered_VVD her_APPGE own_DA path_NN1 to_II emotional_JJ and_CC intellectual_JJ fulfilment_NN1 with_IW women_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 my_APPGE grandmother_NN1 offering_VVG her_APPGE strength_NN1 and_CC support_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Contemporary_JJ Chinese_JJ Christian_JJ theology_NN1 often_RR struggles_VVZ between_II two_MC extreme_JJ choices_NN2 regarding_II this_DD1 problem_NN1 :_: to_TO adopt_VVI an_AT1 adapting_JJ strategy_NN1 and_CC join_VVI with_IW a_AT1 country_NN1 in_II this_DD1 world_NN1 ,_, or_CC to_TO persist_VVI with_IW a_AT1 differentiating_JJ strategy_NN1 and_CC thoroughly_RR break_VV0 with_IW this_DD1 world_NN1 and_CC even_RR the_AT current_JJ country_NN1 (_( but_CCB not_XX oppose_VV0 the_AT current_JJ politics_NN1 and_CC their_APPGE structure_NN1 ,_, and_CC due_II21 to_II22 one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 survival_NN1 and_CC historical_JJ reasons_NN2 intentionally_RR avoid_VV0 contact_NN1 with_IW authority_NN1 or_CC even_RR not_XX pursue_VV0 a_AT1 legal_JJ identity_NN1 for_IF oneself_PNX1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 general_RR22 ,_, we_PPIS2 want_VV0 our_APPGE models_NN2 of_IO responders_NN2 to_TO explain_VVI and_CC justify_VVI our_APPGE claims_NN2 about_II the_AT residual_JJ deficits_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS X_ZZ1 were_VBDR going_VVG to_II chop_NN1 off_II three_MC of_IO Victim_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 fingers_NN2 and_CC Victim_NN1 were_VBDR not_XX liable_JJ ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Theorem_NN1 9_MC N_ZZ1 ?_? is_VBZ consistent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, some_DD prominent_JJ Aristotelian_JJ scholars_NN2 generalise_VV0 the_AT relevant_JJ senses_NN2 of_IO deliberation_NN1 and_CC rational_JJ choice_NN1 involved_JJ in_II phronsis_NN1 to_II '_NULL rationality_NN1 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL volition_NN1 '_NULL ,_, more_RGR generally_RR (_( see_VV0 McDowell_NP1 2007_MC ,_, Russell_NP1 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Instead_II21 of_II22 assuming_VVG a_AT1 thoroughgoing_JJ identity_NN1 between_II two_MC objects_NN2 and_CC thus_RR expecting_VVG their_APPGE respective_JJ descriptions_NN2 to_TO match_VVI perfectly_RR in_II the_AT end_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM also_RR restrict_VVI the_AT set_NN1 of_IO matching_JJ properties_NN2 to_II a_AT1 real_JJ subset_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II construction_NN1 b=d_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS h()=h_NNU (_( β_NULL )_) ,_, G_ZZ1 ?_? (_( b_ZZ1 ,_, h()_ZZ1 )_) ?_? (_( d_ZZ1 ,_, h_ZZ1 (_( β_NULL )_) )_) ;_; so_RR we_PPIS2 are_VBR happy_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Althusser_NN1 ,_, to_TO recall_VVI ,_, tied_VVD ideology_NN1 to_II the_AT Ideological_JJ State_NN1 Apparatus_NN1 ,_, conceding_VVG only_RR parenthetically_RR the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST ideology_NN1 was_VBDZ '_NULL originally_RR '_NULL secreted_VVN in_II the_AT social_JJ infrastructure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 its_APPGE goals_NN2 and_CC methods_NN2 have_VH0 evolved_VVN over_II time_NNT1 on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO continual_JJ reflections_NN2 ,_, and_CC behind_II such_DA reflections_NN2 are_VBR constant_JJ struggles_NN2 to_TO find_VVI ways_NN2 of_IO resolving_VVG forces_NN2 that_CST pull_VV0 her_PPHO1 in_RP apparently_RR competing_JJ directions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Its_APPGE meaning_NN1 was_VBDZ widely_RR known_VVN and_CC people_NN often_RR interpreted_VVN and_CC explained_VVN it_PPH1 in_II different_JJ expressions-the_AT Wuxing_NP1 speaks_VVZ of_IO shendu_NN1 as_CSA "_" being_VBG able_JK to_TO be_VBI one_MC1 (_( heart/_NN1 mind_NN1 )_) "_" ,_, the_AT "_" Liqi_JJ "_" chapter_NN1 speaks_VVZ of_IO it_PPH1 as_CSA "_" internalizing_VVG the_AT heart/mind_NN1 ,_, "_" and_RR31 so_RR32 on_RR33 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 can_VM weigh_VVI them_PPHO2 in_RP with_IW other_JJ considerations_NN2 that_CST are_VBR important_JJ for_IF her_PPHO1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 subversion_NN1 of_IO the_AT natural_JJ order_NN1 (_( Mimesis_NP1 II_MC )_) confronts_VVZ us_PPIO2 with_IW the_AT order_NN1 of_IO telos_NN2 and_CC causes_NN2 of_IO our_APPGE pragmatic_JJ world_NN1 (_( Mimesis_NP1 I_ZZ1 )_) and_CC prompts_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO question_VVI the_AT factual_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II human_NN1 and_CC nature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 interpret_VV0 these_DD2 complex_JJ patterns_NN2 in_II greater_JJR detail_NN1 in_II the_AT Discussion_NN1 section_NN1 below_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 agree_VV0 &lsqb;_( with_IW Budd_NP1 &rsqb;_) that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 experience_NN1 of_IO physical_JJ (_( geographic_JJ )_) space_NN1 ,_, but_CCB I_PPIS1 disagree_VV0 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 experience_NN1 of_IO space_NN1 and_CC movement_NN1 ..._... 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ to_TO contemplate_VVI use-values_NN2 ,_, the_AT satisfaction_NN1 of_IO needs_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT actual_JJ situation_NN1 of_IO concrete_JJ labour_NN1 :_: '_NULL There_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 violence_NN1 in_II abstraction_NN1 which_DDQ hides_VVZ the_AT negotiation_NN1 of_IO uses_NN2 inherent_JJ in_II commoning_VVG '_NULL (_( p._NNU 90_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 ?_? (_( x_ZZ1 1_MC1 ,_, ..._... ,_, x_ZZ1 n_ZZ1 )_) be_VBI a_AT1 1-formula_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB determining_VVG the_AT right_JJ pathway_NN1 will_VM require_VVI relying_VVG on_II the_AT right_JJ policy_NN1 instruments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 title_NN1 can_VM reasonably_RR be_VBI assigned_VVN to_II what_DDQ has_VHZ come_VVN to_TO be_VBI known_VVN as_II Tait_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Thesis_NN1 -_- i.e._REX ,_, that_DD1 finitism_NN1 coincides_VVZ with_IW PRA_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Virtue_NN1 ethics_NN implies_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 morally_RR obligatory_JJ action_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 person_NN1 at_II a_AT1 time_NNT1 is_VBZ the_AT action_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 virtuous_JJ agent_NN1 would_VM do_VDI in_II the_AT same_DA circumstances_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT types_NN2 of_IO parties_NN2 that_CST can_VM transform_VVI working_VVG classes_NN2 into_II leading_JJ agents_NN2 of_IO social_JJ transformation_NN1 have_VH0 yet_RR to_TO be_VBI invented_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT obscurity_NN1 of_IO weak_JJ ground_NN1 ,_, together_RL with_IW its_APPGE centrality_NN1 in_II Fine_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 system_NN1 ,_, threatens_VVZ to_TO undermine_VVI the_AT extent_NN1 to_II which_DDQ this_DD1 formalization_NN1 offers_NN2 clarity_NN1 and_CC precision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO put_VVI it_PPH1 simply_RR ,_, Bowell_NP1 and_CC Kingsbury_NP1 ,_, by_II exerting_VVG the_AT virtue_NN1 of_IO careful_JJ critical_JJ scrutiny_NN1 (_( focus_VV0 on_II any_DD unclear_JJ or_CC defective_JJ details_NN2 in_II a_AT1 target_NN1 argument_NN1 )_) ,_, violated_VVD the_AT virtue_NN1 of_IO relevant_JJ engagement_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, avoid_VV0 focusing_VVG on_II what_DDQ is_VBZ manifestly_RR of_IO minor_JJ importance_NN1 in_II your_APPGE target_NN1 argument_NN1 )_) :_: this_DD1 ,_, in_II turn_NN1 ,_, risked_VVD side-tracking_NN1 the_AT discussion_NN1 on_II VAT_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 comments_NN2 in_II the_AT Pro-Islam_NP1 category_NN1 called_VVN for_IF organising_VVG protests_NN2 in_II different_JJ places_NN2 in_II Arab_JJ countries_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 Oman_NP1 ,_, Jordan_NP1 ,_, Sudan_NP1 and_CC Egypt_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Section_NN1 5_MC concludes_VVZ with_IW a_AT1 summary_NN1 of_IO the_AT contribution_NN1 of_IO the_AT article_NN1 to_II existing_JJ literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT studies_NN2 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 drawn_VVN on_II assume_VV0 SSAI_NN1 is_VBZ deployed_VVN to_TO create_VVI a_AT1 global_JJ aerosol_NN1 cloud_NN1 ,_, but_CCB the_AT latitudinal_JJ distribution_NN1 of_IO aerosols_NN2 could_VM be_VBI modified_VVN to_II some_DD extent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF many_DA2 participants_NN2 ,_, Hip_NN1 Hop_NN1 culture_NN1 signifies_VVZ modernity_NN1 ,_, youth_NN1 ,_, openness_NN1 to_II a_AT1 global_JJ world_NN1 ,_, and_CC often_RR protest_VV0 and_CC social_JJ critique_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 us_PPIO2 recapitulate_VVI :_: There_EX exists_VVZ a_AT1 unique_JJ formal_JJ move_NN1 that_CST allows_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO re-describe_VVI gravitational_JJ systems_NN2 in_II a_AT1 fundamentally_RR different_JJ way_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II such_DA a_AT1 case_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ the_AT responsibility_NN1 of_IO the_AT enlightened_JJ few_DA2 to_TO enlighten_VVI (_( or_CC bring_VV0 consciousness_NN1 to_II )_) the_AT masses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT crucial_JJ question_NN1 is_VBZ this_DD1 :_: even_CS21 if_CS22 I_PPIS1 were_VBDR convinced_VVN that_DD1 echolocation_NN1 is_VBZ something_PN1 that_CST I_PPIS1 can_VM experience_VVI when_CS given_VVN the_AT right_JJ instructions_NN2 ,_, why_RRQ should_VM I_PPIS1 extrapolate_VVI from_II that_DD1 to_II my_APPGE auditory_JJ experience_NN1 in_RR21 general_RR22 or_CC indeed_RR that_DD1 of_IO others_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 know_VV0 why_RRQ ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. Notice_VV0 that_CST when_CS n_ZZ1 =_FO 2_MC ,_, simple_JJ algebra_NN1 shows_VVZ that_CST the_AT two_MC expressions_NN2 on_II the_AT right_NN1 for_IF LRCA/SA_NP1 agree_VV0 and_CC equal_VV0 the_AT expression_NN1 in_II Equation_NN1 (_( 2_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ to_TO be_VBI expected_VVN since_CS for_IF two_MC leaves_VVZ the_AT star_NN1 and_CC delayed_JJ tree_NN1 are_VBR identical_JJ ,_, and_CC this_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT only_JJ tree_NN1 shape_NN1 possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
GS_NP1 ,_, the_AT rest_NN1 of_IO Jackson_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 argument_NN1 against_II nonnaturalism_NN1 can_VM be_VBI repeated_VVN exactly_RR as_CSA before_RT ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE grasp_NN1 of_IO the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO existence_NN1 consists_VVZ in_II the_AT disposition_NN1 to_TO judge_VVI that_CST T_ZZ1 exists_VVZ if_CS one_PN1 posits_VVZ (_( acknowledges_VVZ )_) T_ZZ1 and_CC to_TO posit_VVI (_( acknowledge_VV0 )_) T_ZZ1 if_CS one_PN1 judges_VVZ that_CST T_ZZ1 exists_VVZ without_IW any_DD further_JJR premise_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Hilbert_NP1 space_NN1 formalism_NN1 ,_, the_AT "_" states_NN2 "_" correspond_VV0 to_II rays_NN2 (_( or_CC one-dimensional_JJ subspaces_NN2 )_) of_IO a_AT1 given_JJ Hilbert_NP1 space_NN1 H._NP1 A_ZZ1 quantum_NN1 test_NN1 ?_? ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 sound_NN1 ,_, Kania_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 argument_NN1 might_VM still_RR fail_VVI to_TO lend_VVI much_DA1 outright_JJ support_NN1 to_II fictionalism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT velocities_NN2 of_IO the_AT particles_NN2 are_VBR described_VVN by_II a_AT1 collection_NN1 of_IO velocity_NN1 fields_NN2 indexed_VVN by_II particle_NN1 number_NN1 ,_, k_ZZ1 ,_, In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, since_CS the_AT gay_JJ gene_NN1 is_VBZ presumed_VVN to_TO be_VBI inherited_VVN in_II a_AT1 recessive_JJ manner_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 person_NN1 will_VM only_RR become_VVI homosexual_JJ when_CS he_PPHS1 inherits_VVZ one_MC1 copy_NN1 of_IO the_AT homosexual_JJ gene_NN1 from_II each_DD1 parent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB that_CST we_PPIS2 have_VH0 done_VDN is_VBZ articulated_VVN a_AT1 theory_NN1 of_IO abstract_JJ dependence_NN1 and_CC shown_VVN how_RRQ it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI made_VVN consistent_JJ with_IW this_DD1 case_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 suggests_VVZ that_CST macro-level_JJ social_JJ facts-for_NN2 instance_NN1 ,_, that_CST there_EX exist_VV0 widespread_JJ discriminatory_JJ employment_NN1 practices-are_VBR the_AT causes_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 to_II intersectionality_NN1 theorists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Queer_JJ theory_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN very_RG valuable_JJ and_CC necessary_JJ in_II the_AT deconstruction_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 often_RR fixating_VVG concept_NN1 of_IO identity_NN1 ,_, and_CC hence_RR it_PPH1 has_VHZ contributed_VVN greatly_RR to_II the_AT de-essentialisation_NN1 of_IO sexuality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB why_RRQ think_VVI that_CST promoting_VVG the_AT good_JJ is_VBZ the_AT only_JJ thing_NN1 that_CST morality_NN1 prescribes_VVZ ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Memory_NN1 ,_, transmission_NN1 and_CC heritage_NN1 featured_VVD greatly_RR in_II his_APPGE writings_NN2 and_CC concerns_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE notion_NN1 of_IO quasi-universal_JJ is_VBZ different_JJ from_II all_DB other_JJ uses_NN2 of_IO the_AT phrase_NN1 in_II having_VHG the_AT following_JJ characteristics_NN2 :_: (_( 1_MC1 )_) quasi-universals_NN2 are_VBR family_NN1 resemblance_NN1 concepts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL ,_, the_AT interviewee_NN1 explains_VVZ how_RRQ the_AT close_JJ relationship_NN1 with_IW embedded_JJ ties_NN2 allowed_VVN for_IF the_AT sharing_NN1 of_IO proprietary_JJ information_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ enabled_VVD firms_NN2 to_TO find_VVI work_NN1 during_II slow_JJ periods_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS I_PPIS1 grasp_VV0 a_AT1 metaphor_NN1 to_TO simultaneously_RR mean_VVI Hitler_NP1 ,_, Gandhi_NP1 ,_, the_AT theory_NN1 of_IO everything_PN1 and_CC popcorn_NN1 ,_, what_DDQ sort_NN1 of_IO meaning_NN1 have_VH0 I_PPIS1 grasped_VVN ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 being_VBG more_RRR embedded_VVN in_II a_AT1 cohesive_JJ neighborhood_NN1 ,_, religious_JJ individuals_NN2 may_VM have_VHI more_DAR family_NN1 ties_NN2 than_CSN non-religious_JJ individuals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 tried_VVD to_TO show_VVI how_RRQ we_PPIS2 can_VM create_VVI this_DD1 illusion-according_NN1 to_II him_PPHO1 ,_, our_APPGE "_" sense_NN1 of_IO the_AT passage_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 "_" is_VBZ the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO two_MC factors_NN2 :_: phenomenological_JJ and_CC linguistic.24_FO First_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR aware_JJ of_IO sequences_NN2 of_IO experiences_NN2 in_II which_DDQ events_NN2 that_CST are_VBR initially_RR anticipated_VVN are_VBR then_RT sensed_VVN and_CC subsequently_RR remembered_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, this_DD1 paper_NN1 discusses_VVZ them_PPHO2 together_RL not_XX to_TO look_VVI at_II the_AT content_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE thought_NN1 ,_, but_CCB rather_RR their_APPGE common_JJ argumentative_JJ method_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ similar_JJ to_II the_AT method_NN1 of_IO thought_NN1 experiments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Once_CS we_PPIS2 determine_VV0 which_DDQ reactions_NN2 rational_JJ aesthetic_JJ beliefs_NN2 usually_RR justify_VV0 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM read_VVI off_II the_AT epistemic_JJ status_NN1 of_IO deferential_JJ aesthetic_JJ beliefs_NN2 by_II seeing_VVG exactly_RR which_DDQ reactions_NN2 they_PPHS2 justify_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 of_IO them_PPHO2 come_VV0 to_TO mention_VVI and_CC use_VVI Ivan_NP1 Karamazov_NP1 in_II the_AT course_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE discussion_NN1 ,_, and_CC both_DB2 of_IO them_PPHO2 use_VV0 him_PPHO1 incorrectly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT further_RRR we_PPIS2 look_VV0 into_II the_AT future_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT more_RRR that_DD1 future_NN1 might_VM differ_VVI from_II our_APPGE affluent_JJ present_NN1 ,_, the_AT harder_JJR it_PPH1 is_VBZ to_TO believe_VVI that_CST predictions_NN2 about_II what_DDQ people_NN will_VM (_( or_CC might_VM or_CC could_VM )_) desire_NN1 have_VH0 any_DD real_JJ moral_JJ significance_NN1 -_- or_CC to_TO believe_VVI that_CST such_DA predictions_NN2 provide_VV0 a_AT1 solid_JJ foundation_NN1 for_IF morality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, suppose_VV0 v_ZZ1 ?_? is_VBZ actually_RR true_JJ in_II M_ZZ1 ,_, relative_II21 to_II22 an_AT1 actual_JJ variable-assignment_NN1 g_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 argue_VV0 that_CST although_CS Walton_NP1 has_VHZ not_XX in_II fact_NN1 provided_VVD a_AT1 necessary_JJ condition_NN1 for_IF fictionality_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 more_RGR complex_JJ version_NN1 of_IO Walton_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 condition_NN1 is_VBZ immune_JJ from_II the_AT counterexample_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 article_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 match_VV0 our_APPGE investigation_NN1 to_II this_DD1 emphasis_NN1 through_II likewise_RR focusing_VVG on_II husbands_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Painters_NN2 and_CC philosophers_NN2 alike_RR have_VH0 dealt_VVN with_IW problems_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 color_NN1 constancy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Latin_JJ America_NP1 ,_, bourgeois_JJ enlightenment_NN1 implies_VVZ a_AT1 bold_JJ strategy_NN1 of_IO alliances_NN2 with_IW popular_JJ sectors_NN2 designed_VVN to_TO combat_VVI imperialist_JJ penetration_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB by_II hypothesis_NN1 ,_, neither_RR x_ZZ1 nor_CC y_ZZ1 is_VBZ purely_RR logical_JJ ,_, and_CC so_RR it_PPH1 follows_VVZ that_CST both_RR x_ZZ1 and_CC y_ZZ1 must_VM be_VBI analyzable_JJ in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 A._NNU By_II the_AT transitivity_NN1 of_IO analyzability_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 then_RT have_VH0 that_DD1 x_ZZ1 and_CC y_ZZ1 are_VBR analyzable_JJ in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 each_PPX221 other_PPX222 ,_, contrary_II21 to_II22 hypothesis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Heersmink_VV0 attempts_NN2 precisely_RR this_DD1 ,_, and_CC we_PPIS2 examine_VV0 his_APPGE argument_NN1 next_MD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Scheler_NP1 experience_NN1 is_VBZ both_RR representational_JJ and_CC relational-and_CC essentially_RR so_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT question_NN1 "_" why_RRQ should_VM we_PPIS2 be_VBI moral_JJ "_" but_CCB "_" what_DDQ is_VBZ morally_RR right_JJ "_" that_CST occupies_VVZ people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 minds_NN2 in_II moral_JJ conversations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT notions_NN2 of_IO truth_NN1 in_II a_AT1 model_NN1 ,_, validity_NN1 in_II a_AT1 model_NN1 ,_, satisfiability_NN1 and_CC validity_NN1 are_VBR defined_VVN as_CSA before_RT ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 suggests_VVZ that_CST racial_JJ characteristics_NN2 define_VV0 groups_NN2 prior_II21 to_II22 historically-specific_JJ social_JJ processes_NN2 of_IO racialisation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Previous_JJ research_NN1 has_VHZ examined_VVN a_AT1 variety_NN1 of_IO mediators_NN2 in_II the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II religious_JJ involvement_NN1 and_CC individual_JJ outcomes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Krause_NP1 2002_MC ;_; Schieman_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2010_MC )_) ,_, and_CC additional_JJ research_NN1 has_VHZ examined_VVN how_RGQ religious_JJ beliefs_NN2 modify_VV0 relationships_NN2 between_II involvement_NN1 and_CC outcomes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Bradshaw_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2008_MC ;_; Ellison_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Now_RT ,_, how_RRQ does_VDZ the_AT first_MD aim_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 article_NN1 ,_, to_TO unpack_VVI the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 semi-peripheral_JJ Nordic_JJ position_NN1 ,_, relate_VV0 to_II the_AT latter_DA ,_, advocacy_NN1 of_IO comparativism_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT public_JJ sphere_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI conceived_VVN as_II an_AT1 institution_NN1 and_CC certainly_RR not_XX as_II an_AT1 organisation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 analysis_NN1 reveals_VVZ that_CST Wertheimer_NP1 and_CC Resnik_NP1 are_VBR mistaken_VVN in_II rejecting_VVG SVR_NP1 for_IF most_DAT clinical_JJ research_NN1 studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM start_VVI by_II briefly_RR examining_VVG a_AT1 traditional_JJ approach_NN1 to_II norms_NN2 inspired_VVN by_II Wittgenstein_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 so-called_JJ rule-following_JJ considerations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR Marcel_NP1 Duchamp_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 famous_JJ Fountain_NN1 (_( 1918_MC )_) has_VHZ undergone_VVN a_AT1 complex_JJ process_NN1 of_IO artistic_JJ recognition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST these_DD2 characterizations_NN2 are_VBR not_XX explanatory_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, this_DD1 Hegelian_JJ utopian_JJ idea_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN impugned_VVN by_II current_JJ historiography_NN1 and_CC philosophy_NN1 of_IO history_NN1 and_CC can_VM only_RR be_VBI stated_VVN as_II a_AT1 regulative_JJ idea_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE formal_JJ emancipation_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ released_VVD them_PPHO2 from_II payment_NN1 of_IO tribute_NN1 and_CC the_AT obligation_NN1 of_IO forced_JJ labour_NN1 ,_, was_VBDZ not_XX necessarily_RR welcome_VV0 ,_, because_CS Indians_NN2 in_II Peru_NP1 ,_, Ecuador_NP1 and_CC Bolivia_NP1 '_NULL saw_VVD tribute_NN1 as_II a_AT1 legal_JJ proof_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE landholdings_NN2 from_II the_AT surplus_NN1 of_IO which_DDQ they_PPHS2 paid_VVD their_APPGE dues_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS this_DD1 is_VBZ correct_JJ ,_, our_APPGE plausible_JJ moral_JJ reasons_NN2 of_IO beneficence_NN1 and_CC non-malfeasance_NN1 are_VBR best_RRT seen_VVN as_CSA instances_NN2 of_IO moral_JJ reasons_NN2 to_TO bring_VVI about_RP the_AT overall_JJ best_JJT outcomes_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ exhaust_VV0 the_AT content_NN1 of_IO morality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS 6_MC |_NULL =_FO A_ZZ1 ,_, then_RT A_ZZ1 fails_VVZ in_II some_DD model_NN1 in_II which_DDQ there_EX are_VBR at_RR21 most_RR22 2n_FO +_FO 2_MC instants_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
How_RGQ legal_JJ thought_NN1 ,_, talk_VV0 ,_, and_CC reality_NN1 relate_VV0 to_II ethical_JJ thought_NN1 ,_, talk_VV0 ,_, and_CC reality_NN1 can_VM only_RR be_VBI settled_VVN by_II actually_RR doing_VDG metalegal_JJ and_CC metaethical_JJ work_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC what_DDQ this_DD1 means_VVZ is_VBZ that_CST the_AT bolt-hole_NN1 envisaged_VVN for_IF Stecker_NP1 has_VHZ been_VBN closed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR if_CS such_DA accounts_NN2 are_VBR presented_VVN as_CSA phenomenological_JJ analyses_NN2 ,_, then_RT they_PPHS2 introduce_VV0 an_AT1 element_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ not_XX itself_PPX1 manifest_JJ or_CC apparent_JJ in_II experience_NN1 :_: that_CST the_AT image_NN1 actively_RR shows_VVZ something_PN1 is_VBZ not_XX itself_PPX1 something_PN1 that_CST '_NULL shows_VVZ itself_PPX1 '_NULL ,_, as_CSA Wiesing_NP1 ,_, with_II31 reference_II32 to_II33 Heidegger_NP1 ,_, puts_VVZ it_PPH1 (_( 93_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, suppose_VV0 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 painting_NN1 would_VM look_VVI a_AT1 certain_JJ way_NN1 or_CC a_AT1 piece_NN1 of_IO music_NN1 would_VM sound_VVI a_AT1 certain_JJ way_NN1 makes_VVZ for_IF the_AT fittingness_NN1 of_IO aesthetically_RR appreciating_VVG the_AT potential_JJ painting_NN1 or_CC music_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 holds_VVZ that_CST something_PN1 has_VHZ a_AT1 function_NN1 only_RR if_CS it_PPH1 has_VHZ a_AT1 history_NN1 ,_, unlike_II the_AT free_JJ beauty_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 thing_NN1 which_DDQ is_VBZ independent_JJ of_IO its_APPGE function_NN1 and_CC of_IO its_APPGE history_NN1 (_( a_AT1 thing_NN1 has_VHZ free_JJ beauty_NN1 at_II a_AT1 time_NNT1 just_RR in_II virtue_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ at_II that_DD1 time_NNT1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS the_AT repressive_JJ efforts_NN2 of_IO the_AT state_NN1 are_VBR sufficiently_RR intense_JJ ,_, religious_JJ firms_NN2 competing_VVG with_IW the_AT state_NN1 sponsored_JJ monopoly_NN1 will_VM be_VBI forced_VVN to_TO operate_VVI underground_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA framework_NN1 involves_VVZ understanding_VVG their_APPGE natural_JJ environment_NN1 by_II (_( 1_MC1 )_) grasping_VVG natural_JJ kind_NN1 objects_NN2 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 their_APPGE essential_JJ properties_NN2 and_CC (_( 2_MC )_) thinking_NN1 of_IO the_AT environment_NN1 in_II generic_JJ terms_NN2 ,_, as_CSA governed_VVN by_II general_JJ descriptive_JJ regularities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 submit_VV0 that_CST these_DD2 claims_NN2 about_II the_AT value_NN1 of_IO caring_NN1 are_VBR plausible_JJ ,_, and_CC I_ZZ1 '_NULL ll_NNU assume_VV0 that_CST they_PPHS2 are_VBR true_JJ henceforth_RT ._. 
</s>
<s>
Russell_NP1 himself_PPX1 expounded_VVD the_AT paradox_NN1 in_II term_NN1 of_IO the_AT property_NN1 of_IO predicates_NN2 that_CST they_PPHS2 are_VBR not_XX self-predicative_JJ ,_, i.e._REX ,_, the_AT "_" predicates_NN2 which_DDQ are_VBR not_XX predicable_JJ of_IO themselves_PPX2 "_" (_( Russell_NP1 &lsqb;_( 28_MC ,_, p._NN1 80_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR also_RR some_DD important_JJ differences_NN2 ,_, however_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC although_CS he_PPHS1 also_RR suggests_VVZ that_CST '_NULL a_AT1 positive_JJ content_NN1 '_NULL can_VM be_VBI extracted_VVN from_II the_AT argument_NN1 in_II the_AT form_NN1 of_IO the_AT reflection_NN1 principle_NN1 ,_, his_APPGE subsequent_JJ exposition_NN1 makes_VVZ clear_JJ that_CST he_PPHS1 is_VBZ referring_VVG not_XX to_II the_AT demonstrability_NN1 of_IO RFN_NP1 (_( PA_NNU )_) in_II an_AT1 extension_NN1 of_IO PA_NN1 ,_, but_CCB rather_RR to_II that_DD1 of_IO the_AT uniform_JJ reflection_NN1 principle_NN1 for_IF the_AT theories_NN2 IEn_NN1 within_II PA_NN1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, we_PPIS2 need_VV0 to_TO ensure_VVI that_CST we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX employ_VVI Western_JJ philosophical_JJ terms_NN2 with_IW presuppositions_NN2 alien_NN1 to_II the_AT Confucians_NN2 '_NULL perspectives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 commentary_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 will_VM try_VVI to_TO assuage_VVI this_DD1 kind_NN1 of_IO skepticism_NN1 and_CC suggest_VVI that_CST philosophi-cal_JJ inquiry_NN1 into_II global_JJ justice_NN1 matters_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS Vi_NP1 and_CC r_ZZ1 are_VBR coded_VVN by_II firing_VVG rates_NN2 ,_, then_RT δ_FO correlates_VVZ with_IW the_AT difference_NN1 between_II those_DD2 firing_VVG rates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT messianic_JJ direction_NN1 is_VBZ established_VVN by_II the_AT work_NN1 of_IO John_NP1 D._NP1 Caputo_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alspector-Kelly_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 first_MD argument_NN1 was_VBDZ meant_VVN to_TO deepen_VVI Teller_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 insistence_NN1 on_II the_AT phenomenology_NN1 of_IO looking_VVG through_II a_AT1 microscope_NN1 :_: as_CSA Alspector-Kelly_NP1 puts_VVZ it_PPH1 ,_, the_AT judgement_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 see_VV0 real_JJ dense_JJ bodies_NN2 or_CC paramecia_NN1 is_VBZ "_" phenomenologically_RR irresistible_JJ "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC when_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR not_XX functioning_VVG smoothly_RR ,_, people_NN do_VD0 turn_VVI to_II medicine_NN1 and_CC medicines_NN2 in_II an_AT1 indirect_JJ ,_, voluntary_JJ attempt_NN1 to_TO get_VVI these_DD2 processes_NN2 back_RP on_II track_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT "_" No_AT Trespassing_JJ "_" sign_NN1 is_VBZ for_IF keeping_VVG strangers_NN2 off_II my_APPGE lawn_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT email_NN1 is_VBZ for_IF getting_VVG me_PPIO1 to_TO believe_VVI that_CST the_AT colloquium_NN1 will_VM occur_VVI at_II a_AT1 certain_JJ time_NNT1 and_CC place_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT twofold_JJ thesis_NN1 will_VM figure_VVI prominently_RR in_II my_APPGE own_DA account_NN1 of_IO the_AT distinction_NN1 between_II music_NN1 and_CC natural_JJ sounds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT extension_NN1 of_IO Menzel_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 insight_NN1 with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 the_AT treatment_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ constants_NN2 to_II second-order_JJ modal_JJ languages_NN2 is_VBZ particularly_RR relevant_JJ as_CSA it_PPH1 shows_VVZ that_CST ,_, contrary_II21 to_II22 some_DD arguments_NN2 in_II the_AT literature_NN1 ,_, austere_JJ modal_JJ metaphysicians_NN2 have_VH0 available_JJ reasonably_RR strong_JJ second-order_JJ modal_JJ logics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Wang_NP1 ,_, the_AT mind_NN1 and_CC the_AT external_JJ world_NN1 were_VBDR not_XX fully_RR distinguishable_JJ ,_, for_IF the_AT world_NN1 was_VBDZ no_AT more_DAR than_CSN that_DD1 to_II which_DDQ the_AT operation_NN1 of_IO the_AT mind_NN1 was_VBDZ directed_VVN ;_; for_IF Zhan_NP1 ,_, as_CSA the_AT mind_NN1 was_VBDZ enlarged_VVN to_II the_AT point_NN1 of_IO covering_VVG the_AT whole_JJ external_JJ world_NN1 ,_, the_AT self-ceased_JJ to_TO be_VBI merely_RR a_AT1 small_JJ part_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 larger_JJR whole_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ the_AT external_JJ world_NN1 :_: "_" The_AT mind_NN1 embodies_VVZ everything_PN1 without_IW an_AT1 exception_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 prefer_VV0 the_AT translation_NN1 "_" selfish_JJ "_" for_IF si_FW ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT classical_JJ conservative_JJ extension_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 classical_JJ base_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT '_NULL largest_JJT '_NULL (_( by_II set_JJ theoretical_JJ inclusion_NN1 )_) conservative_JJ extension_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 classical_JJ base_NN1 ,_, but_CCB there_EX will_VM be_VBI smaller_JJR (_( by_II set_JJ theoretical_JJ inclusion_NN1 )_) non-classical_JJ extensions_NN2 as_RR21 well_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 statement_NN1 demonstrates_VVZ that_CST the_AT packages_NN2 are_VBR seen_VVN ,_, not_XX only_RR as_CSA protection_NN1 for_IF food_NN1 ,_, but_CCB as_CSA carriers_NN2 of_IO photographs_NN2 as_RR21 well_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX has_VHZ been_VBN quite_RG a_AT1 bit_NN1 of_IO debate_NN1 over_II the_AT question_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ Mencius_NP1 conceived_VVD of_IO the_AT process_NN1 of_IO extension_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, for_IF any_DD public_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 means_VVZ an_AT1 effectiveness_NN1 out_II21 of_II22 all_DB proportion_NN1 to_II visible_JJ ,_, express_VV0 effort_NN1 ;_; second_MD ,_, for_IF the_AT agent_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 means_VVZ one_PN1 is_VBZ becoming_VVG better_RRR and_CC better_RRR at_II doing_VDG more_RRR and_CC more_RRR with_IW less_DAR and_CC less_RRR ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 does_VDZ not_XX really_RR correspond_VVI to_II a_AT1 dynamical_JJ coupling_NN1 ,_, since_CS the_AT VEV_NP1 is_VBZ an_AT1 average_NN1 of_IO the_AT fluctuations_NN2 in_II the_AT vacuum_NN1 and_CC appears_VVZ as_II a_AT1 constant_JJ in_II the_AT Lagrangian_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 agree_VV0 with_IW Balashov_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 intuition_NN1 that_CST SlowThread_NP1 ought_VMK not_XX to_TO count_VVI as_II an_AT1 object_NN1 in_II motion_NN1 ;_; however_RR ,_, unlike_II Balashov_NP1 ,_, I_PPIS1 grant_VV0 that_CST SlowThread_NP1 is_VBZ an_AT1 object_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, even_RR the_AT primary_JJ elements_NN2 of_IO the_AT language_NN1 can_VM have_VHI their_APPGE meaning_NN1 decomposed_VVN into_II several_DA2 parts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT financial_JJ crisis_NN1 which_DDQ unfolded_VVD from_II 2007_MC onwards_RL was_VBDZ caused_VVN ;_; in_II an_AT1 immediate_JJ sense_NN1 ;_; by_II US_NP1 banks_NN2 which_DDQ ,_, in_II a_AT1 spate_NN1 of_IO aggressive_JJ lending_NN1 ,_, had_VHD off-loaded_VVN more_RRR than_CSN $1_NNU trillion_NNO in_II dangerous_JJ subprime_NN1 mortgage_NN1 loans_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, consider_VV0 the_AT intuitive_JJ true_JJ sentence_NN1 (_( 1_MC1 )_) "_" there_EX could_VM have_VHI been_VBN things_NN2 that_CST do_VD0 not_XX actually_RR exist_VVI "_" ,_, or_CC more_RGR clearly_RR "_" possibly_RR ,_, there_EX exists_VVZ an_AT1 object_NN1 distinct_JJ from_II each_DD1 object_NN1 that_CST exists_VVZ in_RP @_II "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT idea_NN1 that_CST morality_NN1 derives_VVZ from_II Heaven_NN1 and_CC Earth_NN1 is_VBZ fundamentally_RR absurd_JJ ;_; yet_RR at_II that_DD1 period_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ profoundly_RR internalized_VVN ,_, providing_VVG a_AT1 powerful_JJ prop_NN1 to_II morality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 us_PPIO2 now_RT consider_VVI a_AT1 version_NN1 of_IO robust_JJ reflexivism_NN1 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 which_DDQ a_AT1 subject_NN1 S_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 episodic_JJ memory_NN1 represents_VVZ the_AT centre_NN1 of_IO the_AT remembered_JJ event_NN1 as_CSA being_VBG identical_JJ with_IW S_ZZ1 in_II a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST can_VM not_XX be_VBI explained_VVN at_II all_DB in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 the_AT memory_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 perspectivally_RR formatted_VVD qualitative_JJ content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS wide-scope_JJ permissions_NN2 and_CC '_NULL oughts_NN2 '_NULL do_VD0 not_XX allow_VVI for_IF factual_JJ detachment_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM not_XX conclude_VVI that_CST you_PPY are_VBR permitted_VVN not_XX to_TO take_VVI a_AT1 day_NNT1 off_RP ,_, which_DDQ was_VBDZ the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST threatened_VVD the_AT transmission_NN1 principle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT effort_NN1 involved_JJ in_II his_APPGE trial_NN1 and_CC error_NN1 procedure_NN1 is_VBZ productive_JJ effort_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Confucianism_NN1 not_XX only_RR determined_JJ ethical_JJ norms_NN2 in_II Japanese_JJ daily_JJ life_NN1 ,_, but_CCB can_VM also_RR be_VBI found_VVN in_II '_NULL Way-awareness_NN1 '_NULL too_RG ..._... 
</s>
<s>
._. His_APPGE book_NN1 titles_NN2 were_VBDR often_RR excellent_JJ ;_; sharp_JJ and_CC nasty_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Chang_NP1 (_( 1997b_FO )_) points_VVZ out_RP that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ intuitively_RR irrational_JJ for_IF an_AT1 agent_NN1 to_TO repeatedly_RR trade_VVI between_II ever_RR more_RGR lukewarm_JJ cups_NN2 of_IO tea_NN1 or_CC coffee_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Trotsky_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 theory_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX only_RR a_AT1 moving_JJ ,_, evolving_VVG one_PN1 ,_, but_CCB also_RR a_AT1 theory_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 object_NN1 of_IO study_NN1 presented_VVN as_CSA so_RG much_DA1 in_II flux_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI defined_VVN only_RR from_II consideration_NN1 of_IO likely_JJ futures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF simplicity_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 will_VM focus_VVI on_II the_AT remaining_JJ ,_, less_RGR controversial_JJ ,_, cases_NN2 of_IO full_JJ ground_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 common_JJ view_NN1 of_IO privilege_NN1 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 rests_VVZ on_II untenable_JJ assumptions_NN2 that_CST are_VBR traces_NN2 of_IO the_AT ideology_NN1 of_IO meritocracy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT relationship_NN1 between_II programmatic_JJ lessons_NN2 and_CC concrete_JJ experience_NN1 was_VBDZ manifest_JJ in_II the_AT Communist_JJ League_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Ce_NP1 que_FW veut_VV0 la_FU ligue_NN1 communiste_NN1 ,_, the_AT central_JJ committee_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 manifesto_NN1 (_( 1972_MC )_) ,_, the_AT Oui_FW ,_, le_FW socialisme_NN1 !_! 
</s>
<s>
The_AT skeptical_JJ stance_NN1 taken_VVN in_II the_AT text_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX dogmatic_JJ or_CC doctrinal_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II that_DD1 scenario_NN1 Humpty_NN1 Dumpty_NN1 would_VM need_VVI to_TO have_VHI the_AT belief_NN1 that_CST he_PPHS1 could_VM in_II principle_NN1 be_VBI understood_VVN ,_, if_CS not_XX by_II Alice_NP1 then_RT by_II someone_PN1 else_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 said_VVD ,_, I_PPIS1 can_VM now_RT turn_VVI to_II explicating_VVG this_DD1 reductive_JJ impetus_NN1 account_NN1 of_IO motion_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE take_VV0 on_RP the_AT "_" honest_JJ "_" kind_NN1 of_IO classical_JJ motion_NN1 described_VVN by_II classical_JJ physics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
SMB_NP1 faces_VVZ serious_JJ difficulties_NN2 ,_, many_DA2 of_IO which_DDQ result_VV0 from_II undercutting_VVG the_AT puzzle_NN1 it_PPH1 addresses_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 expect_VV0 the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II density_NN1 dependence_NN1 and_CC mortality_NN1 will_VM be_VBI the_AT same_DA even_CS21 if_CS22 congregations_NN2 are_VBR a_AT1 unique_JJ organizational_JJ form_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, this_DD1 proposition_NN1 has_VHZ its_APPGE truth_NN1 value_NN1 computed_VVD in_RP just_RR the_AT way_NN1 that_CST one_PN1 would_VM expect_VVI of_IO the_AT double_JJ negation_NN1 of_IO John_NP1 is_VBZ tall_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 think_VV0 so_RR :_: Since_CS both_DB2 the_AT signals_NN2 from_II the_AT moving_JJ object_NN1 and_CC the_AT static_JJ background_NN1 have_VH0 to_TO be_VBI processed_VVN together_RL by_II the_AT same_DA system_NN1 through_II the_AT same_DA channels_NN2 to_TO yield_VVI a_AT1 representation_NN1 of_IO motion_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ reasonable_JJ to_TO expect_VVI that_CST when_CS one_PN1 is_VBZ conscious_JJ ,_, so_RR is_VBZ the_AT other_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, the_AT semantic_JJ value_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 proper_JJ name_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 function_NN1 from_II possible_JJ worlds_NN2 (_( qua_FW contexts_NN2 of_IO origin_NN1 )_) to_II individuals_NN2 ,_, assigning_VVG to_II each_DD1 possible_JJ world_NN1 an_AT1 individual_JJ that_CST exists_VVZ at_II that_DD1 possible_JJ world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS any_DD temporal_JJ part_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 cause_NN1 that_CST could_VM be_VBI a_AT1 candidate_NN1 for_IF being_VBG the_AT last_MD one_PN1 must_VM be_VBI able_JK to_TO cause_VVI the_AT first_MD temporal_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT effect_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT starting_NN1 assumption_NN1 of_IO the_AT second_MD sub-argument_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST causes_NN2 are_VBR processes_NN2 that_CST undergo_VV0 change_NN1 over_II time_NNT1 ,_, this_DD1 means_VVZ that_CST the_AT last_MD temporal_JJ part_NN1 could_VM not_XX be_VBI the_AT temporal_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT cause_NN1 that_CST persists_VVZ during_II the_AT period_NN1 &lsqb;_( t2_FO ,_, t3_FO )_) ,_, or_CC any_DD of_IO its_APPGE temporal_JJ parts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ often_RR of_IO more_DAR interest_NN1 to_II us_PPIO2 whether_CSW a_AT1 piece_NN1 of_IO clay_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 statue_NN1 than_CSN whether_CSW a_AT1 statue_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 piece_NN1 of_IO clay_NN1 ,_, the_AT latter_DA ,_, too_RR ,_, may_VM well_RR be_VBI of_IO concern_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 central_JJ aspect_NN1 of_IO the_AT very_RG different_JJ paradigm_NN1 that_CST Buddhaghosa_NP1 has_VHZ to_TO offer_VVI us_PPIO2 stems_NN2 from_II the_AT role_NN1 of_IO context_NN1 in_II understanding_VVG the_AT meaning_NN1 of_IO textual_JJ statements_NN2 (_( e._ZZ1 g._NNU ,_, p._NN1 58_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC by_II the_AT time_NNT1 Gumplowicz_NP1 published_VVD it_PPH1 ,_, I_PPIS1 had_VHD already_RR progressed_VVN from_II my_APPGE original_JJ point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 to_II another_DD1 one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB what_DDQ is_VBZ the_AT ethical_JJ criterion_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT main_JJ limitation_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 argument_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST it_PPH1 assumes_VVZ that_CST if_CS two_MC taxa_NN2 have_VH0 a_AT1 common_JJ ancestor_NN1 ,_, their_APPGE most_RGT recent_JJ common_JJ ancestor_NN1 was_VBDZ in_II the_AT very_RG recent_JJ past_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ that_CST Roy_NP1 will_VM be_VBI morally_RR required_VVN to_TO save_VVI the_AT lives_NN2 of_IO no_AT more_DAR than_CSN n_ZZ1 distant_JJ strangers_NN2 over_II the_AT course_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE life_NN1 ,_, where_CS n_ZZ1 is_VBZ significantly_RR less_DAR than_CSN the_AT number_NN1 of_IO distant_JJ strangers_NN2 that_CST he_PPHS1 could_VM save_VVI were_VBDR he_PPHS1 to_TO disregard_VVI all_DB other_JJ moral_JJ goals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 considerations_NN2 could_VM be_VBI adduced_VVN in_II31 favor_II32 of_II33 this_DD1 explanation_NN1 ,_, and_CC I_PPIS1 take_VV0 it_PPH1 that_CST the_AT burden_NN1 of_IO proof_NN1 would_VM be_VBI on_II the_AT opponent_NN1 to_TO show_VVI that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 appropriate_JJ explanation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW this_DD1 conditional_NN1 in_II hand_NN1 ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 NTG_NP1 was_VBDZ already_RR assumed_VVN ,_, it_PPH1 follows_VVZ that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT case_NN1 that_CST both_RR causes_VVZ and_CC effects_NN2 are_VBR instantaneous_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC in_II this_DD1 background_NN1 meta-language_NN1 ,_, '_NULL all_DB subsets_NN2 '_NULL simply_RR means_VVZ '_NULL ALL_DB subsets_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT goal_NN1 is_VBZ simply_RR to_TO tailor_VVI the_AT logic_NN1 step_NN1 by_II step_NN1 until_CS it_PPH1 correctly_RR models_VVZ the_AT reasoning_NN1 task_NN1 at_II hand_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Evidently_RR we_PPIS2 have_VH0 a_AT1 disagreement_NN1 about_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT indeterminacy_NN1 in_II (_( S_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS the_AT main_JJ objective_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 essay_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX about_II moral_JJ education/cultivation_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 will_VM not_XX pursue_VVI the_AT practical_JJ side_NN1 of_IO the_AT relation_NN1 between_II holding_VVG true_JJ and_CC making_VVG true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR we_PPIS2 could_VM study_VVI the_AT logics_NN2 of_IO these_DD2 relational_JJ structures_NN2 in_II the_AT relational_JJ semantics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 way_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 was_VBDZ quite_RG right_JJ to_TO insist_VVI that_CST science_NN1 can_VM and_CC does_VDZ proceed_VVI without_IW any_DD special_JJ philosophical_JJ contribution_NN1 ,_, whether_CSW realist_NN1 or_CC idealist_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO note_VVI that_CST the_AT argument_NN1 that_CST an_AT1 abstraction_NN1 principle_NN1 has_VHZ models_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 certain_JJ kind_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, that_CST it_PPH1 satisfies_VVZ a_AT1 given_JJ safety_NN1 constraint_NN1 )_) is_VBZ not_XX itself_PPX1 intended_VVN as_II a_AT1 proof_NN1 of_IO the_AT existence_NN1 of_IO objects_NN2 named_VVN by_II the_AT abstraction_NN1 principle_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 singular_JJ terms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
F3_FO is_VBZ not_XX derivable_JJ from_II F1_FO ,_, F2_FO ,_, F4_FO in_II T._NP1 To_TO prove_VVI this_DD1 claim_NN1 we_PPIS2 use_VV0 the_AT following_JJ model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS we_PPIS2 say_VV0 this_DD1 ,_, though_CS ,_, then_RT we_PPIS2 may_VM seem_VVI to_TO find_VVI ourselves_PPX2 in_II an_AT1 uncomfortable_JJ dilemma_NN1 over_II definitions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Positive_JJ effects_NN2 on_II health_NN1 and_CC behavior_NN1 might_VM be_VBI explained_VVN ,_, in_RR21 part_RR22 ,_, by_II religious_JJ communities_NN2 '_NULL social_JJ support_NN1 networks_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ can_VM help_VVI strengthen_VVI individuals_NN2 '_NULL ability_NN1 to_TO cope_VVI with_IW poor_JJ health_NN1 (_( Krause_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2001_MC ;_; Nooney_NP1 and_CC Woodrum_NP1 2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Needless_JJ to_TO say_VVI ,_, Fermat_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 last_VV0 theorem_NN1 is_VBZ necessarily_RR true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 am_VBM not_XX aware_JJ of_IO any_DD treatment_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 issue_NN1 in_II the_AT literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF a_AT1 genuine_JJ expert_NN1 to_TO be_VBI in_II a_AT1 position_NN1 to_TO signal_VVI her_APPGE laudable_JJ skills_NN2 as_II an_AT1 aesthetic_JJ appreciator_NN1 she_PPHS1 will_VM frequently_RR be_VBI required_VVN to_TO expend_VVI significant_JJ effort_NN1 in_II familiarising_VVG herself_PPX1 with_IW the_AT nature_NN1 and_CC history_NN1 of_IO the_AT works_NN she_PPHS1 is_VBZ discussing_VVG and_CC -_- by_II direct_JJ acquaintance_NN1 or_CC otherwise_RR -_- with_IW the_AT works_NN themselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Parmenides_NN2 ,_, young_JJ Socrates_NP1 affirms_VVZ that_CST there_EX are_VBR Forms_NN2 of_IO the_AT beautiful_JJ ,_, the_AT just_RR ,_, and_CC the_AT good_JJ ,_, but_CCB denies_VVZ that_CST there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 Form_NN1 of_IO hair_NN1 or_CC of_IO mud_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, and_CC more_RGR specifically_RR ,_, it_PPH1 could_VM be_VBI proposed_VVN that_CST we_PPIS2 perceive_VV0 a_AT1 face_NN1 or_CC eyes_NN2 to_TO be_VBI bad_JJ and_CC ugly_JJ because_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR objectively_RR bad_JJ and_CC ugly_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ is_VBZ conceded_VVN elsewhere_RL is_VBZ relevant_JJ for_IF Berkeley_NP1 ,_, and_CC ,_, as_CSA Locke_NP1 suggested_VVD ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ fair_JJ to_TO '_NULL press_VVI a_AT1 man_NN1 with_IW consequences_NN2 drawn_VVN from_II his_APPGE own_DA principles_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR in_II Thomas_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 account_VV0 ,_, one_PN1 occasionally_RR has_VHZ the_AT sense_NN1 that_CST more_DAR conventional_JJ understandings_NN2 of_IO '_NULL philosophy_NN1 '_NULL (_( abstract_JJ reflections_NN2 on_II metaphysical_JJ questions_NN2 ,_, or_CC even_RR more_RGR narrowly_RR ,_, the_AT discipline_NN1 taught_VVN under_II that_DD1 name_NN1 in_II the_AT contemporary_JJ academy_NN1 )_) ,_, although_CS ostensibly_RR declared_VVN passe_JJ and_CC slated_VVN for_IF a_AT1 head-to-toe_JJ reconceptualisation_NN1 ,_, have_VH0 discreetly_RR shaped_VVN his_APPGE account_NN1 and_CC influenced_VVN his_APPGE focus_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 his_APPGE explanation_NN1 quoted_VVN above_RL ,_, li_MC has_VHZ the_AT capacity_NN1 to_TO steer_VVI and_CC regulate_VVI qi_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR low-probability_JJ laws_NN2 can_VM be_VBI used_VVN to_TO establish_VVI a_AT1 causal_JJ link_NN1 if_CS no_AT other_JJ causal_JJ factors_NN2 can_VM reasonably_RR be_VBI found_VVN to_TO account_VVI for_IF the_AT explanandum_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fundamental_JJ physics_NN1 thus_RR has_VHZ entered_VVN a_AT1 stage_NN1 where_RRQ theories_NN2 are_VBR considered_VVN likely_JJ viable_JJ first_MD for_IF theoretical_JJ reasons_NN2 ,_, and_CC if_CS any_DD evidence_NN1 for_IF them_PPHO2 is_VBZ going_VVGK to_TO be_VBI discovered_VVN ,_, the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO significant_JJ but_CCB inconclusive_JJ evidential_JJ support_NN1 for_IF individual_JJ theories_NN2 will_VM constitute_VVI the_AT status_NN121 quo_NN122 for_IF many_DA2 years_NNT2 or_CC even_RR decades_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Moscow-based_JJ ecci_NN2 initially_RR opposed_VVD the_AT German_JJ party_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Open_JJ Letter_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT visual_JJ content_NN1 of_IO the_AT Uranus-perception_NN1 is_VBZ always_RR a_AT1 bright_JJ spot_NN1 in_II the_AT sky_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX may_VM ,_, nonetheless_RR ,_, be_VBI a_AT1 legitimate_JJ reason_NN1 for_IF adding_VVG and_CC cancelling_VVG quickly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II such_DA a_AT1 connection_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 would_VM not_XX go_VVI so_RG far_RR as_CSA to_TO claim_VVI that_CST there_EX is_VBZ no_AT philosophy_NN1 outside_II comparative_JJ philosophy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM argue_VVI that_CST both_DB2 of_IO these_DD2 views_NN2 face_VV0 serious_JJ difficulties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Warburton_NP1 ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, counts_VVZ only_RR as_CSA legitimate_JJ those_DD2 impressions_NN2 that_CST are_VBR ratified_VVN p-instances_NN2 ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 the_AT unsigned_JJ impressions_NN2 are_VBR perfectly_RR adequate_JJ e-instances_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 should_VM come_VVI as_II no_AT surprise_NN1 that_CST I_PPIS1 count_VV0 promises_NN2 to_TO have_VHI sex_NN1 as_CSA over_II extensive_JJ because_CS they_PPHS2 fall_VV0 into_II this_DD1 last_MD category_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Unfortunately_RR ,_, this_DD1 proposal_NN1 raises_VVZ a_AT1 puzzle_NN1 as_RG perplexing_JJ as_CSA the_AT one_PN1 it_PPH1 purports_VVZ to_TO solve_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Writing_VVG this_DD1 book_NN1 was_VBDZ initiated_VVN by_II the_AT '_NULL five_MC questions_NN2 '_NULL sent_VVN by_II the_AT Emperor_NN1 of_IO Sicily_NP1 Fredrick_NP1 II_MC (_( 1194-1250_MCMC )_) to_II the_AT Ayyubid_JJ Sultan_NN1 alMalik_NN1 alKamil_NN1 (_( 1218-1238_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT strategy_NN1 undoubtedly_RR clarifies_VVZ and_CC unifies_VVZ the_AT Prison_NN1 Notebooks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II either_DD1 case_NN1 ,_, the_AT Dao_NP1 is_VBZ being_VBG spoken_VVN of_IO ,_, in_II31 spite_II32 of_II33 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST the_AT Dao_NP1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI spoken_VVN of_IO ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ to_TO say_VVI ,_, the_AT common_JJ paradox_NN1 would_VM still_RR arise_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 try_VV0 to_TO accommodate_VVI those_DD2 features_NN2 by_II claiming_VVG that_DD1 bodily_JJ sensations_NN2 and_CC feelings_NN2 are_VBR in_II fact_NN1 intentional_JJ episodes_NN2 that_CST represent_VV0 some_DD state_NN1 of_IO the_AT body_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 end_VV0 up_RP in_II a_AT1 conception_NN1 -_- also_RR defended_VVN by_II some_DD philosophers_NN2 -_- in_II which_DDQ bodily_JJ sensations_NN2 and_CC feelings_NN2 are_VBR perceptual_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT arguments_NN2 so_RG far_RR hold_VV0 ,_, the_AT march_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 conscientious_JJ and_CC communicative_JJ act_NN1 that_CST demanded_VVD political_JJ change_NN1 in_II a_AT1 framework_NN1 of_IO social_JJ cooperation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS these_DD2 two_MC pictures_NN2 are_VBR "_" faithful_JJ "_" to_II the_AT original_JJ and_CC between_II themselves_PPX2 the_AT transformation_NN1 between_II the_AT functors_NN2 F_ZZ1 and_CC G_ZZ1 is_VBZ natural_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, to_TO become_VVI a_AT1 consummate_JJ person_NN1 entails_VVZ cultivated_JJ habits_NN2 of_IO moral_JJ conduct_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ worth_II noting_VVG that_CST the_AT question_NN1 whether_CSW the_AT cognitive_JJ penetration_NN1 occurs_VVZ or_CC not_XX can_VM be_VBI approached_VVN without_IW settling_VVG the_AT aforementioned_JJ difference_NN1 in_II the_AT definitions_NN2 of_IO cognitive_JJ penetration_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Aristotle_NP1 ,_, God_NP1 administers_VVZ the_AT universe_NN1 by_II "_" extending_VVG over_RP all_DB natural_JJ things_NN2 through_II the_AT seeds_NN2 of_IO life_NN1 in_II each_DD1 both_RR to_II plants_NN2 and_CC to_II animals_NN2 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 genera_NN2 and_CC species_NN "_" (_( 400b31-401a1_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_ZZ1 YouTube_NP1 recording_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 recital_NN1 version_NN1 has_VHZ hits_NN2 numbering_VVG 1,376,724_MC at_II the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO writing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL is_VBZ the_AT plan_NN1 for_IF the_AT remainder_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
None_PN of_IO us_PPIO2 should_VM be_VBI surprised_VVN at_II this_DD1 situation-this_DD1 is_VBZ exactly_RR what_DDQ cross-cultural_JJ interpretation_NN1 is_VBZ supposed_JJ to_TO bring_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Daniel_NP1 Markovits_NP1 emphasizes_VVZ ,_, acts_NN2 of_IO civil_JJ disobedience_NN1 should_VM avoid_VVI becoming_VVG '_NULL a_AT1 form_NN1 of_IO oppression_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ protestors_NN2 attempt_VV0 improperly_RR to_TO impose_VVI their_APPGE personal_JJ political_JJ preferences_NN2 on_II others_NN2 '_NULL (_( 2005,1898_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 could_VM overcome_VVI the_AT first_MD mistake_NN1 by_II picking_VVG some_DD particular_JJ hyperreal_JJ field_NN1 instead_II21 of_II22 the_AT real_JJ numbers_NN2 ,_, and_CC Lewis_NP1 ,_, Skyrms_NP1 ,_, and_CC others_NN2 did_VDD just_RR that_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT GSQ_NP1 asks_VVZ respondents_NN2 to_TO indicate_VVI their_APPGE debt_NN1 levels_NN2 through_II categories_NN2 (_( e.g._REX "_" $10_NNU ,_, 000-$19_FO ,_, 999_MC "_" )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ no_AT need_NN1 to_TO appeal_VVI to_II general_JJ principles_NN2 ;_; the_AT answer_NN1 is_VBZ found_VVN intuitively_RR ,_, not_XX by_II use_NN1 of_IO logical_JJ inference_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS it_PPH1 comes_VVZ to_II the_AT state_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE regulations_NN2 ,_, capital_NN1 depends_VVZ upon_II the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO law_NN1 and_CC bureaucracy_NN1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO be_VBI able_JK to_TO make_VVI rational_JJ decisions_NN2 regarding_II investments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT point_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 taken_VVN together_RL ,_, the_AT closest_RRT A_AT1 1-worlds_NN2 exhaust_VV0 all_DB of_IO the_AT worlds_NN2 that_CST a_AT1 causalist_NN1 regards_VVZ as_CSA relevant_JJ to_II Suzie_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 evaluation_NN1 of_IO A1_FO ,_, and_CC the_AT closest_JJT A2-worlds_NN2 exhaust_VV0 all_DB of_IO the_AT worlds_NN2 that_CST a_AT1 causalist_NN1 regards_VVZ as_CSA relevant_JJ to_II Suzie_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 evaluation_NN1 of_IO A2_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
She_PPHS1 '_NULL d_ZZ1 need_VV0 the_AT philosopher_NN1 to_TO come_VVI knocking_VVG at_II the_AT door_NN1 to_TO tell_VVI her_PPHO1 which_DDQ property_NN1 was_VBDZ best_RRT suited_VVN to_TO play_VVI the_AT characteristic_JJ role_NN1 in_II practical_JJ reasoning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 possible_JJ objection_NN1 to_II this_DD1 view_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT first_MD instance_NN1 of_IO intending_VVG an_AT1 aesthetic_JJ regard_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 tool_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ meant_VVN historically_RR only_RR for_IF practical_JJ use_NN1 would_VM likely_RR have_VHI been_VBN a_AT1 transgressive_JJ act_NN1 at_II the_AT time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cultural_JJ tourism_NN1 can_VM be_VBI seen_VVN as_II an_AT1 example_NN1 of_IO the_AT inter-relatedness_NN1 of_IO the_AT two_MC concepts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reflection_NN1 thus_RR leads_VVZ to_II insight_NN1 into_II our_APPGE natural_JJ needs_NN2 and_CC interests_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ not_XX only_RR crucial_JJ for_IF our_APPGE capability_NN1 of_IO defending_VVG these_DD2 needs_NN2 and_CC interests_NN2 but_CCB also_RR a_AT1 condition_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 state_NN1 of_IO mind_NN1 that_CST d_ZZ1 '_NULL Holbach_NP1 describes_VVZ as_II involving_VVG '_NULL peace_NN1 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL security_NN1 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL tranquility_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II periods_NN2 of_IO prosperity_NN1 ,_, debt_NN1 levels_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO rise_VVI throughout_II the_AT economy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS ultimately_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 think_VV0 this_DD1 is_VBZ an_AT1 unhelpful_JJ criticism_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 would_VM like_VVI to_TO reconstruct_VVI Mitchell_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 argument_NN1 in_II depth_NN1 ,_, as_CSA it_PPH1 does_VDZ point_VVI to_II some_DD more-nuanced_NN1 and_CC interesting_JJ questions_NN2 about_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO feminist_JJ theory_NN1 ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 these_DD2 questions_NN2 remained_VVD undeveloped_JJ in_II Mitchell_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 piece_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ because_CS in_II his_APPGE view_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 two_MC Ru_NN1 traditions_NN2 are_VBR fundamentally_RR dissimilar_JJ ,_, "_" in_II origin_NN1 ,_, in_II methods_NN2 ,_, in_II their_APPGE view_NN1 of_IO human_JJ nature_NN1 ,_, in_II their_APPGE concern_NN1 for_IF society_NN1 and_CC social_JJ reality_NN1 ,_, in_II their_APPGE attitudes_NN2 toward_II rites_NN2 and_CC music_NN1 ,_, in_II their_APPGE understanding_NN1 of_IO history_NN1 ,_, and_CC in_II their_APPGE ideals_NN2 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Catharine_NP1 Abell_NP1 claims_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 still_JJ image_NN1 "_" might_VM depict_VVI a_AT1 moment_NN1 in_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 corollary_NN1 to_II this_DD1 is_VBZ that_DD1 artistic_JJ integrity_NN1 may_VM require_VVI communal_JJ support_NN1 ,_, in_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, financial_JJ support_NN1 for_IF artists_NN2 so_CS they_PPHS2 can_VM create_VVI their_APPGE art_NN1 without_IW compromising_VVG their_APPGE artistic_JJ integrity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fortunately_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 can_VM determine_VVI the_AT results_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 "_" experiment_NN1 "_" without_IW applying_VVG for_IF additional_JJ grant_NN1 money_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 authors_NN2 assume_VV0 relational_JJ features_NN2 can_VM not_XX ground_JJ moral_JJ status_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT popular_JJ relational_JJ views_NN2 currently_RR on_II offer_NN1 do_VD0 face_VVI serious_JJ criticisms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Data_NN on_RL21 board_RL22 independence_NN1 was_VBDZ obtained_VVN from_II corporate_JJ annual_JJ reports_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT opposite_JJ direction_NN1 ,_, suppose_VV0 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ the_AT semiotic_JJ features_NN2 of_IO the_AT text_NN1 that_CST instantly_RR evoke_VV0 the_AT type_NN1 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 is_VBZ this_DD1 understood_JJ genre_NN1 that_CST constrains_VVZ the_AT semantic_JJ ambiguity_NN1 not_XX only_RR of_IO the_AT word_NN1 '_NULL free_JJ '_NULL but_CCB also_RR of_IO the_AT second_MD word_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 can_VM not_XX help_VVI but_CCB reading_VVG in_II its_APPGE corrected_JJ form_NN1 as_CSA '_NULL Viagra_NP1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 would_VM almost_RR certainly_RR say_VVI not_XX ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, when_CS power_NN1 relations_NN2 are_VBR embedded_VVN in_II the_AT communal_JJ mores_NN2 through_II means_NN such_II21 as_II22 discourse_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 alternately_RR enable_VV0 and_CC constrain_VV0 various_JJ actions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
RII_NN2 Let_VV0 A_ZZ1 =_FO (_( A_ZZ1 ,_, V_ZZ1 be_VBI an_AT1 L-structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Are_VBR there_RL important_JJ concepts_NN2 of_IO Western_JJ democratic_JJ thought_NN1 which_DDQ were_VBDR not_XX imported_VVN in_II China_NP1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Wang_NP1 understands_VVZ patterns_NN2 of_IO energy_NN1 as_CSA nested_JJ hierarchical_JJ structures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT lattice_NN1 L4_FO ,_, which_DDQ in_II fact_NN1 acts_VVZ as_II a_AT1 truth_NN1 and_CC falsity_NN1 order_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ thus_RR replaced_VVN by_II two_MC independent_JJ orderings_NN2 ,_, not_XX each_PPX221 other_PPX222 '_NULL s_ZZ1 inverses_NN2 ,_, as_CSA will_VM become_VVI apparent_JJ below_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 means_VVZ that_CST ,_, in_II the_AT manifest_JJ case_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 always_RR have_VH0 a_AT1 conserved_JJ quantity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT mental_JJ abilities_NN2 of_IO an_AT1 eight-year-old_JJ are_VBR less_RGR developed_JJ than_CSN those_DD2 of_IO a_AT1 fourteen-year-old_JJ ,_, but_CCB since_CS the_AT selected_JJ effect_NN1 approach_NN1 treats_VVZ these_DD2 individuals_NN2 as_CSA members_NN2 of_IO the_AT same_DA evolutionary_JJ lineage_NN1 ,_, Boorse_NP1 claims_VVZ it_PPH1 can_VM not_XX distinguish_VVI the_AT two_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT other_JJ two_MC excluded_JJ formulas_NN2 in_II (_( 5.1_MC )_) dispense_VV0 with_IW the_AT need_NN1 of_IO Aristotle_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 axioms_NN2 ?_? (_( →_NULL ?_? )_) and_CC ?_? (_( ?_? →_NULL )_) ,_, the_AT "_" heart_NN1 "_" of_IO connexive_NN1 logic_NN1 (_( Wansing_NP1 (_( 2014_MC )_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB flatness_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX only_RR about_II function_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ an_AT1 ideal_JJ in_II photographic_JJ printing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, that_DD1 would_VM be_VBI dialectically_RR superfluous_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bourgeois_JJ civil_JJ society_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 apparatus_NN1 of_IO proletarian_JJ hegemony_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Also_RR assume_VV0 that_CST ,_, on_II ARC_NP1 ,_, the_AT claim_NN1 to_TO be_VBI cured_VVN of_IO the_AT moderate_JJ impairment_NN1 is_VBZ relevant_JJ to_II the_AT claim_NN1 to_TO be_VBI cured_VVN of_IO the_AT terminal_JJ illness_NN1 ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 we_PPIS2 should_VM aggregate_VVI the_AT claims_NN2 of_IO the_AT hundred_NNO thousand_NNO to_TO be_VBI cured_VVN of_IO the_AT former_DA ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT crucial_JJ problem_NN1 with_IW riots_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT target_NN1 of_IO attack_NN1 can_VM be_VBI arbitrarily_RR expanded_VVN to_TO include_VVI completely_RR unrelated_JJ targets_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT formalization_NN1 of_IO ethics_NN in_II scientific_JJ work_NN1 has_VHZ recently_RR been_VBN described_VVN by_II STS_NP2 scholars_NN2 as_II the_AT coproduction_NN1 of_IO ethics_NN and_CC science_NN1 (_( Pickersgill_NP1 2012_MC ;_; Mamo_NP1 and_CC Fisher_NP1 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 goal_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO be_VBI pursued_VVN ,_, when_CS appropriate_JJ ,_, through_II negotiations_NN2 and_CC agreements_NN2 with_IW the_AT leaderships_NN2 of_IO non-Communist_JJ workers_NN2 '_NULL organisations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA an_AT1 argument_NN1 is_VBZ never_RR an_AT1 argument_NN1 from_II total_JJ ignorance_NN1 (_( a_AT1 complete_JJ absence_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 )_) but_CCB is_VBZ always_RR a_AT1 mixture_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 and_CC ignorance_NN1 "_" (_( Walton_NP1 1996a_FO ,_, pp_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Categories_NN2 of_IO the_AT "_" technical_JJ ,_, "_" "_" social_JJ ,_, "_" "_" political_JJ ,_, "_" and_CC "_" cultural_JJ "_" flow_NN1 through_II the_AT epistemological_JJ and_CC material_NN1 ecologies_NN2 of_IO water_NN1 management_NN1 and_CC establish_VV0 a_AT1 hierarchy_NN1 of_IO positions_NN2 in_II which_DDQ engineers_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE grip_NN1 on_II water_NN1 are_VBR on_II top_NN1 ;_; practices_NN2 of_IO water_NN1 management_NN1 are_VBR entwined_VVN with_IW politics_NN1 and_CC power_NN1 in_II complex_JJ ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ we_PPIS2 should_VM say_VVI ,_, then_RT ,_, is_VBZ that_DD1 when_CS a_AT1 proof_NN1 provides_VVZ a_AT1 novel_NN1 and_CC informative_JJ classification_NN1 of_IO the_AT topic_NN1 of_IO the_AT theorem_NN1 ,_, then_RT this_DD1 is_VBZ evidence_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 underlying_JJ dependence_NN1 relation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Using_VVG the_AT same_DA pooled_JJ data_NN ,_, Froese_JJ et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2008_MC )_) found_VVD an_AT1 image_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 wrathful_JJ God_NP1 was_VBDZ related_VVN positively_RR to_II intolerant_JJ attitudes_NN2 toward_II members_NN2 of_IO particular_JJ groups_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, atheists_NN2 and_CC homosexuals_NN2 )_) ,_, consistent_JJ with_IW Mencken_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2009_MC )_) and_CC Hinze_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2011_MC )_) that_CST the_AT image_NN1 of_IO angry_JJ God_NP1 was_VBDZ inversely_RR related_VVN to_TO trust_VVI in_II other_JJ people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Grundgesetze_NP1 ,_, Vol_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
II_MC ,_, §91_FO ,_, Frege_NP1 argues_VVZ that_CST '_NULL it_PPH1 is_VBZ applicability_NN1 alone_RR which_DDQ elevates_VVZ arithmetic_NN1 from_II a_AT1 game_NN1 to_II the_AT rank_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 science_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT ambiguity_NN1 about_II music_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 status_NN1 appears_VVZ to_TO be_VBI something_PN1 he_PPHS1 might_VM acknowledge_VVI and_CC embrace_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ the_AT structure_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 must_VM discuss_VVI in_CS41 so_CS42 far_CS43 as_CS44 the_AT play_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI reduced_VVN to_II its_APPGE actors_NN2 ,_, nor_CC to_II their_APPGE explicit_JJ relations_NN2 ;_; only_RR to_II the_AT dynamic_JJ relation_NN1 existing_VVG between_II consciousnesses_NN2 self-alienated_NN1 in_II spontaneous_JJ ideology_NN1 ..._... 
</s>
<s>
If_CS this_DD1 case_NN1 hold_NN1 and_CC the_AT logic_NN1 had_VHD boolean_NN1 incorporating_VVG ,_, we_PPIS2 would_VM have_VHI to_TO add_VVI an_AT1 additive_JJ operation_NN1 to_TO apply_VVI this_DD1 derivation_NN1 to_II the_AT model_NN1 construction_NN1 we_PPIS2 will_VM make_VVI and_CC also_RR would_VM prefer_VVI to_TO use_VVI L_ZZ1 rather_II21 than_II22 L._NP1 If_CS woman_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 inscribed_JJ tendency_NN1 to_II emotional_JJ outbursts_NN2 ,_, to_TO wear_VVI her_APPGE exaggerated_JJ feelings_NN2 on_II her_APPGE sleeve_NN1 ,_, has_VHZ no_AT place_NN1 in_II society_NN1 ,_, woman_NN1 must_VM be_VBI given_VVN a_AT1 role_NN1 that_CST mitigates_VVZ her_APPGE behaviour_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC further_RRR ,_, the_AT structure_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 profession_NN1 involves_VVZ the_AT coordination_NN1 of_IO multiple_JJ persons_NN2 ,_, each_DD1 of_IO whom_PNQO is_VBZ similarly_RR situated_VVN insofar_CS21 as_CS22 they_PPHS2 identify_VV0 with_IW the_AT profession_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT last_MD section_NN1 I_PPIS1 drew_VVD out_RP some_DD of_IO the_AT results_NN2 that_CST came_VVD with_IW thinking_NN1 of_IO clutter_NN1 considerations_NN2 as_CSA metanormative_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Behind_II such_DA a_AT1 criticism_NN1 of_IO consumption_NN1 plainly_RR lies_VVZ the_AT effort_NN1 to_TO brush_VVI aside_RL the_AT gauntlet_NN1 thrown_VVN down_RP by_II frustrated_JJ consumers_NN2 at_II the_AT doorstep_NN1 of_IO capitalism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ no_AT guarantee_NN1 of_IO success_NN1 in_II defending_VVG materialism_NN1 ,_, for_IF a_AT1 Marxist_JJ philosopher_NN1 must_VM fight_VVI if_CS not_XX everywhere_RL at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, at_RR21 least_RR22 on_II several_DA2 fronts_NN2 ,_, taking_VVG account_NN1 both_RR of_IO the_AT principal_JJ tendency_NN1 and_CC of_IO the_AT secondary_JJ tendencies_NN2 ,_, both_DB2 of_IO the_AT principal_JJ stake_NN1 and_CC of_IO the_AT secondary_JJ stakes_NN2 ,_, while_CS all_DB the_AT time_NNT1 '_NULL working_VVG '_NULL to_TO occupy_VVI correct_JJ positions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Hilbert_NP1 space_NN1 formalism_NN1 of_IO quantum_NN1 theory_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 quantum_NN1 system_NN1 is_VBZ described_VVN by_II a_AT1 Hilbert_NP1 space_NN1 H_ZZ1 over_II C_NP1 in_II such_DA a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST the_AT (_( pure_JJ )_) states_NN2 of_IO the_AT system_NN1 are_VBR modelled_VVN by_II the_AT one-dimensional_JJ subspaces_NN2 of_IO H_ZZ1 (_( von_NP1 Neumann_NP1 1932_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, the_AT claim_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST someone_PN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 unique_JJ ability_NN1 to_TO provide_VVI aid_NN1 renders_VVZ them_PPHO2 morally_RR responsible_JJ to_II a_AT1 certain_JJ degree_NN1 to_TO do_VDI so_RR ,_, but_CCB this_DD1 responsibility_NN1 may_VM be_VBI outweighed_VVN by_II countervailing_JJ considerations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II Goffman_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 view_NN1 ,_, fronts_NN2 are_VBR a_AT1 pervasive_JJ and_CC inescapable_JJ feature_NN1 of_IO social_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS s_ZZ1 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 identity_NN1 operation_NN1 ,_, then_RT in_II fact_NN1 csdscsds_NNU by_II idempotence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 the_AT only_JJ thing_NN1 contemporary_JJ civilisation_NN1 finds_VVZ nonsensical_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Making_VVG sense_NN1 of_IO multiple_JJ shocks_NN2 is_VBZ a_AT1 recurrent_JJ theme_NN1 on_II the_AT SCA_NN1 community_NN1 website_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ includes_VVZ discussion_NN1 threads_VVZ such_II21 as_II22 "_" how_RGQ many_DA2 zaps_NN2 do_VD0 you_PPY get_VVI ?_? "_" ;_; 
</s>
<s>
"_" ICD_NP1 firing_NN1 when_RRQ not_XX needed_VVN "_" ;_; "_" repetitive_JJ shocks_NN2 "_" ;_; and_CC "_" inappropriate_JJ firings_NN2 "_" (_( P8_FO ;_; 4_MC ,_, 20_MC ,_, 11_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 seen_VVN that_CST this_DD1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI the_AT case_NN1 ,_, for_IF an_AT1 intellect_NN1 is_VBZ only_RR an_AT1 attribute_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 mode_NN1 ,_, and_CC therefore_RR can_VM not_XX be_VBI a_AT1 cause_NN1 of_IO it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Returning_VVG to_II our_APPGE conservation_JJ problem_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 may_VM conclude_VVI that_CST the_AT Carnegie_NP1 Museum_NN1 might_VM have_VHI had_VHN good_JJ reasons_NN2 not_XX to_II redo_NN1 the_AT wall_NN1 drawing_NN1 again_RT ,_, in_RR21 particular_RR22 taking_VVG into_II account_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 had_VHD already_RR been_VBN repainted_VVN in_II 2007_MC :_: a_AT1 gang_NN1 of_IO students_NN2 would_VM have_VHI been_VBN neither_RR equipped_VVN nor_CC authorized_JJ ,_, to_TO do_VDI so-and_CC going_VVG back_RP to_II the_AT LeWitt_NP1 studio_NN1 might_VM have_VHI been_VBN far_RR too_RG expensive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ their_APPGE views_NN2 lack_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, and_CC what_DDQ my_APPGE account_NN1 provides_VVZ ,_, is_VBZ an_AT1 explanation_NN1 of_IO why_RRQ the_AT fission_NN1 case_NN1 should_VM be_VBI regarded_VVN as_II so_RG close_RR to_II cases_NN2 of_IO identity_NN1 in_II which_DDQ we_PPIS2 continue_VV0 to_TO exist_VVI as_II the_AT same_DA person_NN1 ,_, and_CC why_RRQ cases_NN2 involving_VVG replication_NN1 should_VM be_VBI regarded_VVN as_CSA falling_VVG so_RG far_RR short_JJ of_IO preserving_NN1 what_DDQ matters_VVZ in_II identity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 rappers_NN2 around_II the_AT world_NN1 reject_VV0 popular_JJ associations_NN2 of_IO Hip_NN1 Hop_NN1 with_IW gangsterism_NN1 and_CC hedonism_NN1 ,_, insisting_VVG that_DD1 '_NULL real_JJ '_NULL Hip_NN1 Hop_NN1 is_VBZ '_NULL conscious_JJ '_NULL and_CC aims_VVZ to_TO educate_VVI and_CC edify_VVI -_- to_TO '_NULL drop_VVI science_NN1 ,_, to_TO use_VVI a_AT1 term_NN1 originating_VVG with_IW the_AT Five_MC Percent_NNU Nation_NN1 ,_, an_AT1 esoteric_JJ Nation_NN1 of_IO Islam_NN1 outgrowth_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Important_JJ contributions_NN2 have_VH0 demonstrated_VVN how_RGQ international_JJ law_NN1 is_VBZ increasingly_RR '_NULL deformalised_VVN '_NULL (_( moving_VVG from_II so-called_JJ '_NULL command-and-control_JJ '_NULL regulations_NN2 to_II more_RGR '_NULL flexible_JJ '_NULL or_CC softer_JJR regulations_NN2 )_) ,_, why_RRQ international_JJ regulations_NN2 lean_VV0 towards_II the_AT interests_NN2 of_IO heavily_RR polluting_VVG industries_NN2 and_CC northern_JJ countries_NN2 ,_, how_RRQ they_PPHS2 enshrine_JJ an_AT1 '_NULL imperial_JJ mode_NN1 of_IO living_NN1 '_NULL ,_, how_RRQ fraud_NN1 is_VBZ constitutive_JJ of_IO carbon_NN1 markets_NN2 ,_, how_RRQ accounting_NN1 for_IF greenhouse-gas_JJ emissions_NN2 reductions_NN2 is_VBZ quite_RG impossible_JJ ,_, etc_RA ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 makes_VVZ comparative_JJ philosophy_NN1 particularly_RR important_JJ today_RT ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB More_RRR was_VBDZ just_RR one_MC1 of_IO many_DA2 in_II a_AT1 much_RR broader_JJR movement_NN1 of_IO theological_JJ fratricide_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE flavors_NN2 are_VBR quite_RG different_JJ ,_, yet_RR all_DB are_VBR pleasing_JJ to_II the_AT mouth_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT social_JJ logic_NN1 of_IO right_NN1 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Menke_NP1 ,_, is_VBZ not_XX determined_VVN by_II relations_NN2 of_IO production_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX about_II the_AT equal_JJ distribution_NN1 of_IO goods_NN2 ,_, but_CCB about_II the_AT ability_NN1 to_TO equally_RR participate_VVI in_II social_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT space_NN1 that_CST Sullivan_NP1 navigates_VVZ as_II a_AT1 politically_RR conservative_JJ gay_JJ Catholic_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ striking_VVG that_CST 78%_NNU of_IO his_APPGE readers_NN2 self-identify_VV0 as_RG liberal_JJ ,_, 83%_NNU as_II heterosexual_JJ ,_, and_CC 49%_NNU as_II atheist_NN1 (_( with_IW 71%_NNU responding_VVG as_RG non-Christian_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_II foreseeing_VVG specific_JJ outcomes_NN2 in_II specific_JJ situations_NN2 requires_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO consider_VVI the_AT conditions_NN2 required_VVN to_TO bring_VVI them_PPHO2 about_RP ,_, where_CS there_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 end-in-view_NN1 there_EX is_VBZ consideration_NN1 of_IO the_AT means_NN required_VVN (_( Ibid_RR ,_, 415_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 type_NN1 of_IO political_JJ system_NN1 gravely_RR violated_VVD the_AT spirit_NN1 of_IO equality_NN1 inherent_JJ in_II the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO benevolence_NN1 (_( ren_NN1 )_) ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT ideals_NN2 of_IO interconnectedness_NN1 (_( tong_NN1 )_) and_CC communality_NN1 (_( gong_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS it_PPH1 applies_VVZ more_RGR widely_RR ,_, it_PPH1 can_VM not_XX support_VVI consequentialism_NN1 over_II rival_JJ views_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Answer_VV0 :_: some_DD processes_NN2 P_ZZ1 occur_VV0 at_II T_ZZ1 (_( a_AT1 time_NNT1 essential_JJ to_II P_ZZ1 )_) and_CC constitute_VV0 at_II T_ZZ1 that_CST same_DA R_ZZ1 which_DDQ existed_VVD earlier_RRR ,_, by_II contingently_RR succeeding_VVG earlier_JJR processes_NN2 which_DDQ then_RT constituted_VVD R_ZZ1 ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 they_PPHS2 are_VBR genidentical_JJ with_IW earlier_JJR processes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 decomposition_NN1 is_VBZ aimed_VVN at_II replacing_VVG the_AT initial_JJ question_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 simpler_JJR auxiliary_JJ question_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Apart_II21 from_II22 inspiring_VVG my_APPGE students_NN2 and_CC colleagues_NN2 from_II my_APPGE own_DA field_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 central_JJ goal_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 article_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO challenge_VVI Marien_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 rather_RR definitive_JJ statement_NN1 by_II enhancing_VVG that_DD1 family_NN1 photos_NN2 contain_VV0 emotional_JJ ,_, psychological_JJ ,_, and_CC affective_JJ qualities_NN2 that_CST reach_VV0 further_RRR than_CSN the_AT individual_JJ owner_NN1 and_CC that_DD1 should_VM be_VBI put_VVN forward_RL ,_, in_II histories_NN2 of_IO photography_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 in_II more_RGR thorough_JJ and_CC specialized_JJ academic_JJ analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 first_MD that_CST R_ZZ1 is_VBZ identical_JJ with_IW the_AT identity_NN1 relation_NN1 ,_, I._NP1 Given_CS21 that_CS22 ,_, for_IF any_DD variables_NN2 u_ZZ1 and_CC v_ZZ1 ,_, u_ZZ1 =_FO is_VBZ equivalent_JJ to_II v_ZZ1 =_FO w_ZZ1 ,_, it_PPH1 follows_VVZ from_II (_( P3_FO )_) and_CC (_( P4_FO )_) (_( together_RL with_IW the_AT semantics_NN1 of_IO A-expressions_NN2 )_) that_CST I_ZZ1 is_VBZ identical_JJ with_IW its_APPGE own_DA converse_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, either_RR Phillips_NP1 is_VBZ theologically_RR arguing_VVG for_IF a_AT1 particular_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO Christianity_NN1 ,_, or_CC he_PPHS1 should_VM recognize_VVI that_CST the_AT scope_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE arguments_NN2 is_VBZ limited_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_RGT notably_RR ,_, insurers_NN2 that_CST donate_VV0 to_II charities_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO be_VBI larger_JJR ,_, more_RGR profitable_JJ ,_, and_CC more_RGR established_JJ firms_NN2 ,_, while_CS insurance_NN1 firms_NN2 that_CST do_VD0 not_XX contribute_VVI to_II charitable_JJ causes_NN2 are_VBR generally_RR smaller_JJR and_CC more_RGR highly_RR reinsured_VVD entities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 know_VV0 the_AT experiences_NN2 are_VBR unified_VVN ,_, so_CS this_DD1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI what_DDQ prevents_VVZ us_PPIO2 from_II experiencing_VVG the_AT relationship_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT flipside_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 same_DA benefits_NN2 is_VBZ what_DDQ has_VHZ been_VBN referred_VVN to_II as_II the_AT risk_NN1 of_IO '_NULL routinisation_NN1 '_NULL ,_, meaning_VVG that_CST the_AT greater_JJR ease_NN1 and_CC safety_NN1 of_IO NIPT_NN1 may_VM lead_VVI to_II it_PPH1 being_VBG regarded_VVN by_II both_DB2 pregnant_JJ women_NN2 and_CC professionals_NN2 as_II a_AT1 harmless_JJ blood_NN1 test_VV0 that_CST one_PN1 need_VM not_XX think_VVI long_RR about_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
Eva_NP1 Jablonka_NP1 has_VHZ advanced_VVN an_AT1 account_NN1 of_IO information_NN1 along_II this_DD1 alternative_JJ line_NN1 that_CST depends_VVZ only_RR on_II the_AT receiver_NN1 being_VBG able_JK to_TO use_VVI the_AT input_NN1 to_II adaptive_JJ effect_NN1 without_IW the_AT need_NN1 for_IF an_AT1 evolved_JJ sender_NN1 (_( Jablonka_NP1 2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO guard_VVI against_II yet_RR another_DD1 objection_NN1 ,_, the_AT next_MD subsection_NN1 develops_VVZ an_AT1 account_NN1 of_IO mereological_JJ simplicity_NN1 that_CST ,_, rather_CS21 than_CS22 to_II talk_NN1 directly_RR about_II mereological_JJ fusions_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE parts_NN2 ,_, is_VBZ framed_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 '_NULL mereological_JJ descriptions_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 do_VD0 not_XX need_VVI to_TO choose_VVI between_II disrespecting_VVG you_PPY and_CC exposing_VVG you_PPY to_II my_APPGE germs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 notes_VVZ that_CST if_CS what_DDQ we_PPIS2 mean_VV0 by_II "_" something_PN1 is_VBZ good_JJ "_" is_VBZ that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 suitable_JJ means_NN to_II a_AT1 certain_JJ aim_NN1 ,_, then_RT it_PPH1 is_VBZ cognitive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT heading_NN1 of_IO the_AT passage_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST it_PPH1 will_VM defend_VVI some_DD kind_NN1 of_IO identity_NN1 between_II (_( strict_JJ )_) right_NN1 and_CC the_AT authorization_NN1 to_TO coerce_VVI ;_; this_DD1 suggestion_NN1 is_VBZ confirmed_VVN by_II the_AT final_JJ sentence_NN1 of_IO the_AT passage_NN1 announcing_VVG the_AT conclusion_NN1 of_IO the_AT argument_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD is_VBZ connected_VVN to_II what_DDQ chances_NN2 are_VBR ,_, and_CC both_DB2 are_VBR lessons_NN2 for_IF how_RRQ chances_NN2 are_VBR to_TO be_VBI measured_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT more_RGR "_" natural_JJ "_" or_CC descriptive_JJ the_AT coat_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 norms_NN2 looks_VVZ ,_, the_AT stronger_JJR the_AT normative-constitutive_JJ power_NN1 or_CC effect_NN1 they_PPHS2 possess_VV0 or_CC produce_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO think_VVI scientifically_RR we_PPIS2 must_VM turn_VVI against_II ourselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II both_DB2 sets_NN2 of_IO circumstances_NN2 ,_, structural_JJ Marxism_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN compatible_JJ with_IW alliances_NN2 with_IW moderate_JJ leftists_NN2 and_CC non-leftists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Trustworthiness_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 relatively_RR thin_JJ trait_NN1 :_: the_AT requirements_NN2 which_DDQ must_VM be_VBI satisfied_VVN if_CS we_PPIS2 are_VBR to_TO be_VBI trustworthy_JJ place_NN1 only_RR conditional_JJ constraints_NN2 on_II what_DDQ we_PPIS2 should_VM do_VDI ,_, because_CS they_PPHS2 do_VD0 not_XX place_VVI constraints_NN2 on_II which_DDQ commitments_NN2 we_PPIS2 should_VM incur_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Why_RRQ doesn_VVI '_NULL t_ZZ1 it_PPH1 leave_VV0 open_JJ the_AT possibility_NN1 that_CST resistance_NN1 is_VBZ exercised_VVN by_II God_NP1 but_CCB inheres_NN2 in_II something_PN1 else_RR -_- a_AT1 material_NN1 substance_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA I_PPIS1 have_VH0 emphasized_VVN ,_, the_AT interpretation_NN1 of_IO weak_JJ grounding_NN1 claims_VVZ I_PPIS1 have_VH0 offered_VVN is_VBZ disjunctive_JJ :_: ≤_FO is_VBZ ,_, in_II effect_NN1 ,_, interpreted_VVN as_II the_AT disjunctive_JJ claim_NN1 that_CST either_RR strictly_RR grounds_NN2 or_CC is_VBZ identical_JJ to_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT journal_NN1 provides_VVZ a_AT1 forum_NN1 for_IF philosophical_JJ inquiry_NN1 into_II ethics_NN and_CC values_NN2 in_II their_APPGE relationship_NN1 to_II globalisation_NN1 ,_, human_JJ development_NN1 ,_, international_JJ relations_NN2 ,_, peace_NN1 and_CC war_NN1 ,_, social_JJ movements_NN2 ,_, environmental_JJ justice_NN1 ,_, economics_NN1 and_CC politics_NN1 insofar_CS21 as_CS22 these_DD2 subjects_NN2 pertain_VV0 to_II global_JJ justice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT intellectual_JJ equivalent_NN1 of_IO climbing_VVG up_RP and_CC throwing_VVG away_RL the_AT ladder_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 conceals_VVZ its_APPGE contingent_NN1 making_VVG under_II the_AT guise_NN1 of_IO necessity_NN1 ,_, thus_RR denying_VVG the_AT present_NN1 precisely_RR that_DD1 which_DDQ was_VBDZ the_AT condition_NN1 for_IF its_APPGE existence_NN1 ;_; that_DD1 at_II some_DD point_NN1 in_II the_AT past_JJ men_NN2 and_CC women_NN2 decided_VVD that_CST their_APPGE condition_NN1 was_VBDZ contingent_JJ ,_, and_CC struggled_VVN with_IW conviction_NN1 to_TO transform_VVI it_PPH1 ;_; and_CC that_DD1 ,_, contrary_II21 to_II22 the_AT rosy_JJ ,_, falsified_VVD picture_NN1 of_IO incremental_JJ change_NN1 through_II institutions_NN2 ,_, these_DD2 struggles_NN2 often_RR required_VVN going_VVG outside_RL and_CC beyond_II those_DD2 institutions_NN2 themselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Is_VBZ that_DD1 so_RG much_DA1 to_TO ask_VVI ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT details_NN2 are_VBR left_VVN to_II interested_JJ readers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 article_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 have_VH0 outlined_VVN the_AT main_JJ themes_NN2 of_IO the_AT framework_NN1 introduced_VVN in_II DRA_NP1 ,_, arguing_VVG that_CST this_DD1 account_NN1 extends_VVZ previous_JJ research_NN1 in_II the_AT field_NN1 of_IO business_NN1 ethics_NN employing_VVG the_AT schema_NN1 (_( Moore_NP1 &;_NULL Beadle_NP1 ,_, The_AT example_NN1 outlined_VVN above_RL (_( Uzzi_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC )_) extends_VVZ the_AT empirical_JJ application_NN1 of_IO MacIntyre_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 theory_NN1 of_IO the_AT virtues_NN2 and_CC illustrates_VVZ the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO networks_NN2 of_IO giving_VVG and_CC receiving_VVG in_II an_AT1 organizational_JJ and_CC inter-organizational_JJ context_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC contributory_JJ causes_NN2 may_VM be_VBI causally_RR relevant_JJ to_II some_DD fact_NN1 even_CS21 though_CS22 neither_DD1 would_VM be_VBI sufficient_JJ on_II its_APPGE own_DA ,_, as_CSA when_CS two_MC people_NN co-operate_VV0 to_TO move_VVI a_AT1 heavy_JJ object_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lacan_NN1 is_VBZ credited_VVN with_IW the_AT ability_NN1 to_TO integrate_VVI this_DD1 element_NN1 into_II Hegel_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 discourse_NN1 and_CC for_IF this_DD1 reason_NN1 it_PPH1 is_VBZ indispensible_JJ to_TO read_VVI Hegel_NP1 through_II Lacanian_JJ lenses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 the_AT experimental_JJ conditionality_NN1 principle_NN1 and_CC the_AT weak_JJ ancillary_JJ realizability_NN1 principle_NN1 appeal_NN1 to_II the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 mixture_NN1 experiment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS Th_NP1 (_( T_ZZ1 )_) is_VBZ n+1-definable_FO and_CC T_ZZ1 is_VBZ consistent_JJ ,_, then_RT T_ZZ1 is_VBZ not_XX n_ZZ1 -complete_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RRQV the_AT statement_NN1 described_VVN above_RL is_VBZ ambiguous_JJ because_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ known_VVN that_CST the_AT unprovability_NN1 of_IO consistency_NN1 statements_NN2 depends_VVZ on_II the_AT underlying_JJ representation_NN1 of_IO T_ZZ1 ,_, and_CC thus_RR we_PPIS2 must_VM state_VVI G?del_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 second_NNT1 incompleteness_NN1 theorem_NN1 more_RGR precisely_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 article_NN1 maps_NN2 the_AT emergent_JJ field_NN1 of_IO Islamophobia_NP1 Studies_NN2 through_II a_AT1 discussion_NN1 of_IO recently_RR published_VVN monographs_NN2 ,_, representing_VVG the_AT broad_JJ spectrum_NN1 of_IO theoretical_JJ and_CC analytical_JJ approaches_NN2 to_II the_AT phenomenon_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT tax_NN1 on_II corporate_JJ profits_NN2 in_II the_AT US_NP1 is_VBZ unusually_RR high_JJ at_II 35_MC per_NNU21 cent_NNU22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 strikes_VVZ me-for_PPIO1 reasons_NN2 I_PPIS1 will_VM discuss_VVI in_II greater_JJR depth_NN1 below-_NN1 as_II a_AT1 good_JJ strategy_NN1 for_IF differentiating_VVG the_AT three_MC relevant_JJ species_NN of_IO aesthetic_JJ assertion_NN1 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ by_RR31 no_RR32 means_RR33 the_AT only_JJ one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 consequence_NN1 ,_, S4_FO is_VBZ complete_JJ relative_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 general_JJ class_NN1 of_IO models_NN2 of_IO higher-order_JJ logic_NN1 ,_, establishing_VVG that_CST the_AT axiomatic_JJ system_NN1 of_IO higher-order_JJ logic_NN1 of_IO Section_NN1 4_MC can_VM not_XX prove_VVI anything_PN1 about_II the_AT propositional_JJ modal_JJ logic_NN1 of_IO the_AT broadest_JJT necessity_NN1 that_CST can_VM not_XX already_RR be_VBI proven_VVN in_II S4_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT purpose_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 essay_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX to_TO repeat_VVI those_DD2 earlier_JJR arguments_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ to_TO extend_VVI them_PPHO2 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO address_VVI new_JJ developments_NN2 within_II capitalism_NN1 and_CC in_II how_RGQ political_JJ corruption_NN1 is_VBZ understood_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 so_RR happens_VVZ that_CST Mo_NP1 is_VBZ the_AT moral_JJ obstacle_NN1 ,_, and_CC he_PPHS1 will_VM therefore_RR be_VBI the_AT one_PN1 who_PNQS must_VM bear_VVI the_AT additional_JJ cost_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 really_RR don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 know_VV0 enough_RR about_II it_PPH1 really_RR to_TO get_VVI into_II where_RRQ I_PPIS1 stand_VV0 on_II it_PPH1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
She_PPHS1 claimed_VVD that_CST someone_PN1 shouted_VVD '_NULL Towel_NN1 head_NN1 '_NULL at_II her_PPHO1 from_II a_AT1 moving_JJ car_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ma_NP1 Chengyuan_NP1 interpreted_VVD as_RG li_MC (_( )_) ,_, Rao_NP1 Zongyi_NP1 as_CSA lin_NN1 (_( )_) ,_, Li_NP1 Ling_NN1 as_CSA lin_NN1 (_( )_) or_CC lian_NN1 (_( )_) ,_, and_CC Li_NP1 Xueqin_NP1 and_CC Qiu_NP1 Xigui_NP1 as_CSA yin1()_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
His_APPGE understanding_NN1 of_IO reasoning_NN1 is_VBZ undoubtedly_RR practical_JJ insofar_CS21 as_CS22 he_PPHS1 is_VBZ concerned_JJ ,_, not_XX with_IW the_AT truth_NN1 of_IO propositions_NN2 ,_, but_CCB with_IW the_AT desirability_NN1 or_CC value_NN1 of_IO actions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Polanyi_NN2 also_RR shares_VVZ a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO other_JJ tenets_NN2 of_IO Rousseauian_JJ political_JJ philosophy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 explanation_NN1 has_VHZ precisely_RR the_AT profile_NN1 we_PPIS2 would_VM want_VVI from_II an_AT1 explanans_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, no_AT good_JJ like_II G*_FO exists_VVZ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
His_APPGE second_MD precept_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST such_DA language_NN1 variation_NN1 exists_VVZ both_RR '_NULL intra-societally_RR '_NULL and_CC '_NULL inter-societally_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ it_PPH1 means_VVZ is_VBZ that_CST the_AT general_JJ ideas_NN2 that_CST make_VV0 up_RP its_APPGE meaning_NN1 will_VM admit_VVI of_IO possibly_RR contesting_JJ interpretations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO be_VBI sure_JJ ,_, but_CCB do_VD0 critical_JJ Marxists_NN2 really_RR need_VV0 to_TO hear_VVI this_DD1 today_RT ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Get_VV0 a_AT1 Life_NN1 project_NN1 finds_VVZ its_APPGE starting_NN1 point_NN1 in_II guilt_NN1 and_CC takes_VVZ the_AT filmmakers_NN2 to_II a_AT1 site_NN1 of_IO considerable_JJ suffering_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT process_NN1 is_VBZ typically_RR automatic_JJ and_CC unconscious_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ evidenced_VVN by_II public_JJ support_NN1 for_IF sex_NN1 offender_NN1 registries_NN2 (_( Budd_NP1 and_CC Mancini_NP1 2016_MC ;_; Levenson_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2007_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Beginning_VVG at_II the_AT close_NN1 of_IO the_AT nineteenth_MD century_NNT1 ,_, the_AT concept_NN1 followed_VVD the_AT spread_NN1 of_IO liberal_JJ democracy_NN1 into_II China_NP1 by_II31 means_II32 of_II33 translation_NN1 ,_, and_CC brought_VVD about_RP a_AT1 clash_NN1 between_II vocabulary_NN1 and_CC thought_VVN with_IW lasting_JJ ramifications_NN2 for_IF Chinese_JJ thought_NN1 and_CC society_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
DG_NP1 :_: Shelina_NP1 ,_, thanks_NN2 so_RG much_DA1 for_IF agreeing_VVG to_II the_AT interview_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reviewing_VVG the_AT key_JJ risks_NN2 posed_VVN by_II climate_NN1 change_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ that_CST SSAI_NP1 has_VHZ the_AT potential_JJ to_TO reduce_VVI some_DD risks_NN2 substantially_RR ,_, to_TO have_VHI little_DA1 effect_NN1 on_II others_NN2 ,_, and_CC to_TO exacerbate_VVI a_AT1 limited_JJ number_NN1 of_IO risks_NN2 in_II some_DD regions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, ancient_JJ ideas_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO God_NP1 ,_, contain_VV0 an_AT1 aspect_NN1 of_IO psychological_JJ truth_NN1 as_II an_AT1 empirically_RR evident_JJ psychic_JJ reality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ therefore_RR a_AT1 world_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT children_NN2 doing_VDG the_AT stigmatizing_NN1 would_VM have_VHI all_DB kinds_NN2 of_IO evidence_NN1 that_CST she_PPHS1 has_VHZ no_AT birthmark_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT company_NN1 then_RT transports_VVZ the_AT fish_NN (_( again_RT by_II truck_NN1 )_) to_II the_AT hatchery_NN1 where_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR placed_VVN in_II holding_VVG ponds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
How_RRQ can_VM its_APPGE organisation_NN1 be_VBI considered_VVN ,_, then_RT ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT famous_JJ critical_JJ rationalist_NN1 Karl_NP1 Popper_NN1 also_RR discussed_VVN this_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II this_DD1 view_NN1 ,_, then_RT ,_, something_PN1 is_VBZ presupposed_VVN when_CS the_AT context_NN1 contains_VVZ worlds_NN2 at_II which_DDQ the_AT presupposition_NN1 is_VBZ true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Then_RT H_ZZ1 is_VBZ continuous_JJ and_CC ,_, for_IF every_AT1 semi-decidable_JJ fuzzy_JJ subset_NN1 s_ZZ1 ,_, the_AT fuzzy_JJ subset_NN1 H_ZZ1 (_( s_ZZ1 )_) is_VBZ semi-decidable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, for_IF Olesen_NP1 it_PPH1 became_VVD more_RGR important_JJ to_TO present_VVI them_PPHO2 as_CSA tough_JJ migrant_NN1 workers_NN2 laboring_VVG under_II harsh_JJ conditions_NN2 than_CSN to_TO present_VVI them_PPHO2 as_CSA victims_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Accordingly_RR ,_, the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST the_AT relational_JJ and_CC adverbial_JJ theories_NN2 fail_VV0 the_AT simpliciter_NN1 intuition_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX shown_VVN to_TO be_VBI trivial_JJ by_II relativistic_JJ physics_NN1 ,_, the_AT relational_JJ theory_NN1 of_IO color_NN1 ,_, or_CC the_AT individuation_NN1 of_IO temporal_JJ parts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ beyond_II the_AT scope_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 article_NN1 to_TO work_VVI out_RP exactly_RR what_DDQ photographs_VVZ record_NN1 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 will_VM help_VVI a_AT1 lot_NN1 to_II sketch_NN1 an_AT1 account_NN1 of_IO it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR only_RR two_MC types_NN2 of_IO observed_JJ moral_JJ statuses_NN2 which_DDQ are_VBR conferred_VVN in_II virtue_NN1 of_IO two_MC fundamentally_RR different_JJ features_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_CS as_CSA I_PPIS1 read_VV0 his_APPGE central_JJ arguments_NN2 in_II this_DD1 book_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 proceed_VV0 by_II trying_VVG to_TO show_VVI that_CST our_APPGE deliberations_NN2 about_II the_AT conduct_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE own_DA lives_NN2 go_VV0 badly_RR -_- by_II failing_VVG to_TO track_VVI what_DDQ is_VBZ of_IO genuine_JJ moral_JJ importance_NN1 -_- if_CS we_PPIS2 give_VV0 economic_JJ equality_NN1 ,_, or_CC equality_NN1 of_IO some_DD other_JJ kind_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 guiding_JJ or_CC governing_JJ role_NN1 in_II those_DD2 deliberations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT commitments_NN2 essential_JJ to_II realizing_VVG a_AT1 participant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 conversational_JJ goals_NN2 may_VM be_VBI those_DD2 the_AT participant_NN1 makes_VVZ herself_PPX1 ,_, but_CCB some_DD may_VM be_VBI commitments_NN2 made_VVN by_II other_JJ conversational_JJ participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 can_VM also_RR see_VVI the_AT continuity_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 analysis_NN1 of_IO hoarding_VVG in_II the_AT words_NN2 used_VMK to_TO characterise_VVI money_NN1 as_CSA hoard_NN1 :_: inorganic_JJ or_CC burnt-out_JJ '_NULL ashes_NN2 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL a_AT1 sheer_JJ figment_NN1 of_IO the_AT imagination_NN1 '_NULL are_VBR used_VVN in_II the_AT Grundrisse_NN1 ,_, the_AT Urtext_NN1 and_CC the_AT Contribution_NN1 ,_, '_NULL caput_VV0 mortuum_NN1 '_NULL in_II the_AT Urtext_NN1 and_CC Contribution_NN1 ,_, and_CC '_NULL petrified_JJ &lsqb;_( versteinern_NN1 &rsqb;_) '_NULL in_II the_AT Urtext_NN1 the_AT Contribution_NN1 ,_, the_AT 1861-3_MCMC Manuscripts_NN2 and_CC Capital_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, the_AT implication_NN1 of_IO the_AT passage_NN1 as_II a_AT1 whole_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST all_DB these_DD2 affections_NN2 ,_, including_II understanding_NN1 and_CC contemplation_NN1 ,_, belong_VV0 to_II the_AT composite_JJ human_JJ being_NN1 insofar_CS21 as_CS22 it_PPH1 possesses_VVZ intellect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 type_NN1 of_IO evaluation_NN1 follows_VVZ the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST evaluation_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 process_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT intervention_NN1 itself_PPX1 can_VM be_VBI adjusted_VVN in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 the_AT experience_NN1 made_VVN with_IW it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Examining_VVG the_AT status_NN1 factors_NN2 ,_, in_II Model_NN1 1_MC1 we_PPIS2 find_VV0 that_DD1 education_NN1 of_IO origin_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX statistically_RR significant_JJ for_IF Evangelical_JJ identification_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 of_IO these_DD2 themes_NN2 are_VBR common_JJ to_II various_JJ engagements_NN2 with_IW other_JJ thinkers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ partly_RR and_CC ,_, according_II21 to_II22 some_DD phenomenologists_NN2 ,_, even_RR primarily_RR through_II our_APPGE emotions_NN2 that_CST the_AT world_NN1 is_VBZ disclosed_VVN to_II us_PPIO2 ,_, that_CST we_PPIS2 become_VV0 present_NN1 to_II and_CC make_VV0 sense_NN1 of_IO ourselves_PPX2 ,_, and_CC that_CST we_PPIS2 relate_VV0 to_II and_CC engage_VV0 with_IW others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, researchers_NN2 have_VH0 also_RR examined_VVN the_AT influence_NN1 of_IO managerial_JJ practices_NN2 on_II ethical_JJ climates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT next_MD stage_NN1 of_IO restructuring_NN1 occurred_VVD under_II the_AT left-wing_JJ government_NN1 of_IO Mitterrand_NP1 in_II 1981_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 article_NN1 ,_, Huang_NP1 stresses_VVZ the_AT important_JJ role_NN1 played_VVN by_II the_AT Chinese_JJ cultural_JJ context_NN1 in_II the_AT historical_JJ process_NN1 of_IO translation_NN1 of_IO Western_JJ concepts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_II 2014_MC ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 seemingly_RR ongoing_JJ series_NN of_IO terror_NN1 attacks_NN2 in_II Western_NP1 Europe_NP1 involving_VVG the_AT terror_NN1 organisation_NN1 Islamic_JJ State_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ has_VHZ steered_VVN the_AT Dutch_JJ debate_NN1 about_II tolerance_NN1 and_CC Islam_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT words_NN2 of_IO the_AT researchers_NN2 ,_, "_" a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO differences_NN2 in_II the_AT organization_NN1 of_IO the_AT writing_NN1 process_NN1 have_VH0 their_APPGE origin_NN1 in_II the_AT characteristics_NN2 of_IO the_AT computer_NN1 itself_PPX1 "_" (_( 838_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Washington_NP1 ,_, the_AT key_JJ interests_NN2 lay_VVD in_II fighting_VVG terrorism_NN1 and_CC drug_NN1 smuggling_NN1 ,_, and_CC in_II checking_VVG the_AT access_NN1 of_IO China_NP1 and_CC Europe_NP1 to_II African_JJ resources_NN2 ,_, markets_NN2 ,_, and_CC military-basing_JJ options_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 question_NN1 remained_VVD thorny_JJ and_CC problematic_JJ for_IF the_AT participants_NN2 in_II this_DD1 20th_MD century_NNT1 symposium_NN1 because_CS they_PPHS2 also_RR had_VHN to_TO grapple_VVI with_IW the_AT possible_JJ (_( un_FW )_) certainty_NN1 of_IO the_AT empirical_JJ evidence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 clear_JJ and_CC obvious_JJ need_NN1 to_TO integrate_VVI human_JJ development_NN1 and_CC our_APPGE response_NN1 to_II climate_NN1 change_NN1 ,_, relying_VVG on_II NDCs_NP1 as_II the_AT primary_JJ instrument_NN1 for_IF the_AT integration_NN1 of_IO development_NN1 into_II climate_NN1 policy_NN1 will_VM not_XX work_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ in_II this_DD1 spirit_NN1 of_IO opening_VVG up_II21 to_II22 the_AT new_JJ origin_NN1 of_IO the_AT philosophical_JJ which_DDQ has_VHZ happened_VVN in_II China_NP1 and_CC which_DDQ is_VBZ now_RT happening_VVG that_CST we_PPIS2 come_VV0 to_TO speak_VVI of_IO the_AT onto-generative_JJ origin_NN1 of_IO the_AT receptive_JJ and_CC the_AT creative_JJ in_II the_AT Yijing_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR can_VV0 Walton_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 approach_NN1 be_VBI amended_VVN to_TO deal_VVI with_IW the_AT above_JJ counterexamples_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 of_IO these_DD2 dimensions_NN2 is_VBZ the_AT interpretation_NN1 of_IO linguistic_JJ behavior_NN1 ,_, carried_VVN out_RP on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO truth-functional_JJ (_( and_CC hence_RR also_RR inferential_JJ )_) data_NN in_II the_AT familiar_JJ (_( earlier_RRR )_) Davidsonian_JJ fashion_NN1 ,_, and_CC contributing_VVG to_II an_AT1 ascription_NN1 of_IO beliefs_NN2 and_CC desires_VVZ to_II the_AT speaker-agent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS Omar_NP1 comes_VVZ to_TO believe_VVI that_CST his_APPGE ticket_NN1 is_VBZ actually_RR not_XX a_AT1 winner_NN1 by_II calculating_VVG the_AT odds_NN2 ,_, then_RT there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 nearby_JJ world_NN1 in_II which_DDQ (_( a_ZZ1 )_) Omar_NP1 comes_VVZ to_TO believe_VVI ,_, by_II calculating_VVG the_AT odds_NN2 ,_, that_CST his_APPGE ticket_NN1 isn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 a_AT1 winner_NN1 and_CC (_( b_ZZ1 )_) Omar_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 belief_NN1 that_CST his_APPGE ticket_NN1 isn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 a_AT1 winner_NN1 is_VBZ insensitive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD part_NN1 reflects_VVZ on_II what_DDQ it_PPH1 means_VVZ to_TO be_VBI located_VVN in_II the_AT Nordic_JJ region_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS the_AT second_MD links_VVZ the_AT view_NN1 from_II the_AT North_ND1 to_II the_AT need_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 revised_JJ cross-cultural_JJ comparativism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
T._NP1 mirus_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT result_NN1 of_IO hybridization_NN1 between_II T_ZZ1 porrifolius_NN1 and_CC T._NP1 dubius_NN1 (_( Soltis_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR generally_RR one_PN1 can_VM also_RR measure_VVI the_AT degree_NN1 to_II which_DDQ one_MC1 signal_NN1 can_VM be_VBI substituted_VVN for_IF another_DD1 given_VVN their_APPGE probabilities_NN2 of_IO occurrence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT materialist_NN1 critique_NN1 of_IO ideology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_RL ,_, Byrne_NP1 conflates_VVZ the_AT author_NN1 and_CC agent_NN1 of_IO the_AT performative_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II this_DD1 interpretation_NN1 ,_, the_AT above_JJ theorem_NN1 tells_VVZ us_PPIO2 that_CST no_AT set_NN1 can_VM have_VHI as_II members_NN2 all_DB and_CC only_RR non-self-membered_JJ sets_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT standardized_JJ setting_NN1 is_VBZ in_II itself_PPX1 a_AT1 reminder_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ this_DD1 kind_NN1 of_IO portraiture_NN1 was_VBDZ intended_VVN to_TO display_VVI the_AT sitter_NN1 as_II a_AT1 typical_JJ example_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 of_IO nature_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 species_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR robust_JJ and_CC precise_JJ inconsistent_JJ mathematical_JJ structures_NN2 ,_, explored_VVN and_CC discussed_VVN ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, in_II (_( 25_MC ;_; 40_MC ;_; 30_MC ;_; 31_MC ;_; 33_MC ;_; 35_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC can_VM (_( and_CC do_VD0 )_) play_VV0 at_II that_DD1 game_NN1 ;_; moralists_NN2 have_VH0 just_RR as_RG strong_JJ grounds_NN2 for_IF making_VVG exactly_RR the_AT same_DA accusation_NN1 ,_, mutatis_RR21 mutandis_RR22 ,_, about_II realists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ an_AT1 average_NN1 of_IO 0.64_MC congregations_NN2 per_II year_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II opposition_NN1 ,_, after_CS the_AT Danish_JJ Muhammad_NP1 cartoons_NN2 ,_, Minister_NP1 Van_NP1 Ardenne_NP1 (_( Christian_JJ conservative_NN1 )_) claimed_VVD that_DD1 freedom_NN1 of_IO speech_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX entail_VVI the_AT right_NN1 to_TO insult_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW great_JJ effort_NN1 and_CC difficulty_NN1 ,_, after_II November_NPM1 there_EX was_VBDZ cooperation_NN1 between_II the_AT Majority_NN1 Socialists_NN2 and_CC the_AT Independents_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Meyer_NP1 himself_PPX1 would_VM soon_RR come_VVI to_TO support_VVI a_AT1 strategy_NN1 directly_RR opposed_VVN to_II that_DD1 of_IO the_AT KPD_NP1 during_II the_AT March_NP1 Action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Outcomes_NN2 may_VM also_RR be_VBI extended_VVN beyond_II the_AT current_JJ focus_NN1 on_II individual_JJ level_JJ outcomes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX work_NN1 attitudes_NN2 ,_, ethical_JJ cognitions_NN2 ,_, intentions_NN2 ,_, and_CC behavior_NN1 )_) and_CC organizational_JJ level_JJ outcomes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX performance_NN1 outcomes_NN2 )_) to_TO consider_VVI how_RGQ ethical_JJ climates_NN2 influence_VV0 employees_NN2 '_NULL behavior_NN1 directed_VVN towards_II external_JJ stakeholders_NN2 (_( community_NN1 citizenship_NN1 behaviors_NN2 )_) ,_, unethical_JJ behavior_NN1 done_VDN with_IW the_AT intention_NN1 of_IO benefiting_VVG the_AT organization_NN1 (_( unethical_JJ pro-organizational_JJ behavior_NN1 )_) ,_, a_AT1 enhancement_NN1 of_IO external_JJ stakeholders_NN2 '_NULL perceptions_NN2 of_IO the_AT organization_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II choice_NN1 of_IO f_ZZ1 ,_, this_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT same_DA as_CSA showing_VVG that_DD1 enu_NN1 (_( et_NP1 m_ZZ1 )_) is_VBZ in_II (_( t_ZZ1 (_( x_ZZ1 )_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA compared_VVN to_II urban_JJ Southerners_NN2 ,_, respondents_NN2 in_II the_AT West_ND1 report_NN1 lower_JJR levels_NN2 of_IO service_NN1 attendance_NN1 ,_, reading_VVG religious_JJ materials_NN2 ,_, perceived_VVD importance_NN1 of_IO taking_VVG children_NN2 to_II religious_JJ services_NN2 ,_, and_CC feelings_NN2 of_IO closeness_NN1 to_II religious_JJ church-going_JJ people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, while_CS the_AT effect_NN1 for_IF the_AT former_DA is_VBZ in_II the_AT direction_NN1 one_PN1 would_VM assume_VVI (_( it_PPH1 makes_VVZ the_AT sign_NN1 appear_VVI more_RGR blue_JJ )_) ,_, the_AT effect_NN1 for_IF the_AT latter_DA is_VBZ not_XX (_( it_PPH1 makes_VVZ the_AT figure_NN1 appear_VVI less_RGR red_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN what_DDQ we_PPIS2 know_VV0 about_II the_AT chairman_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 profit-focus_JJ ,_, in_II the_AT second_MD vignette_NN1 he_PPHS1 does_VDZ not_XX do_VDI the_AT modally_RR demanding_VVG good_JJ of_IO environmental_JJ help_NN1 by_II improving_VVG the_AT environment_NN1 in_II the_AT relevant_JJ range_NN1 of_IO alternative_JJ circumstances_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II definition_NN1 of_IO ,_, (_( w_ZZ1 ,_, f(s)_NNU )_) ?_? ?_? ?_? ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR if_CS weak_JJ dependence_NN1 were_VBDR sufficient_JJ for_IF showing_VVG that_CST a_AT1 property_NN1 were_VBDR not_XX had_VHN simpliciter_NN1 ,_, nothing_PN1 very_RG sophisticated_JJ involving_VVG post-Newtonian_JJ physics_NN1 ,_, the_AT metaphysics_NN1 of_IO color_NN1 ,_, or_CC the_AT individuation_NN1 of_IO temporal_JJ parts_NN2 would_VM need_VVI to_TO be_VBI invoked_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II large_JJ measure_NN1 Zindapir_NN1 had_VHD attempted_VVN to_TO institutionalise_VVI his_APPGE own_DA charisma_NN1 during_II his_APPGE lifetime_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB if_CS Hannah_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 belief_NN1 as_CSA expressed_VVN in_II (_( 4_MC )_) is_VBZ sensitive_JJ ,_, then_RT the_AT sensitivity_NN1 theorist_NN1 doesn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 have_VH0 an_AT1 explanation_NN1 of_IO why_RRQ Hannah_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 belief_NN1 in_II (_( 4_MC )_) fails_VVZ to_TO be_VBI knowledge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 anti-capitalist_JJ strategy_NN1 of_IO Indigenous_JJ liberation_NN1 ,_, then_RT ,_, requires_VVZ broad_JJ networks_NN2 of_IO solidarity_NN1 and_CC purposeful_JJ linkages_NN2 between_II local_JJ battles_NN2 and_CC wider_JJR scales_NN2 of_IO conflict_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
E_ZZ1 :_: Whether_CSW there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 person_NN1 here_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consider_VV0 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT class-based_JJ inequality_NN1 of_IO social_JJ networks_NN2 (_( social_JJ capital_NN1 )_) that_CST Fishkin_NP1 cites_VVZ as_II an_AT1 impediment_NN1 to_II the_AT opportunities_NN2 of_IO working-class_JJ children_NN2 (_( 215-19_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 well-recognized_JJ fact_NN1 that_CST the_AT adoption_NN1 of_IO partiality_NN1 is_VBZ useful_JJ for_IF the_AT analysis_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE conceptual_JJ scheme_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 class_NN1 of_IO categories_NN2 important_JJ for_IF our_APPGE purposes_NN2 is_VBZ the_AT class_NN1 of_IO posset_NN1 categories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ does_VDZ hT_NNU entail_VV0 about_II the_AT sequence_NN1 of_IO outcomes_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, it_PPH1 appears_VVZ only_RR in_II being_VBG set_VVN alongside_II what_DDQ is_VBZ to_TO be_VBI understood_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Is_VBZ this_DD1 change_NN1 an_AT1 intervention_NN1 on_II wine_NN1 that_CST "_" holds_VVZ fixed_VVN "_" my_APPGE having_VHG taken_VVN a_AT1 pain_NN1 killer_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST this_DD1 slightly_RR deviates_VVZ from_II standard_JJ terminology_NN1 ,_, because_CS usually_RR ,_, FL_FW has_VHZ an_AT1 additional_JJ constant_JJ 0_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Necessity_NN1 plays_VVZ the_AT role_NN1 of_IO justifying_VVG a_AT1 restriction_NN1 of_IO the_AT number_NN1 of_IO possible_JJ futures_NN2 to_II exactly_RR those_DD2 which_DDQ are_VBR like_II the_AT past_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX due_II21 to_II22 the_AT presence_NN1 or_CC absence_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 category_NN1 violation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 reflected_VVD that_CST there_EX appeared_VVD to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 wide_JJ disposition_NN1 to_II unbelief_NN1 and_CC this_DD1 was_VBDZ forcing_VVG believers_NN2 onto_II the_AT defensive_JJ and_CC to_TO catechize_VVI themselves_PPX2 on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE own_DA religious_JJ convictions_NN2 (_( Jung_NP1 1998_MC ,_, p._NN1 391_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT metaphor_NN1 has_VHZ typically_RR been_VBN understood_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II the_AT content_NN1 of_IO the_AT belief_NN1 and_CC the_AT facts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, let_VV0 us_PPIO2 say_VVI that_CST the_AT artist_NN1 leaves_VVZ the_AT work_NN1 unpublished_JJ or_CC unperformed_JJ during_II his_APPGE or_CC her_APPGE lifetime_NNT1 ;_; it_PPH1 reaps_VVZ only_RR posthumous_JJ admiration_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR here_RL we_PPIS2 have_VH0 a_AT1 derivative_JJ operator_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 single_JJ parameter_NN1 -_- the_AT lower_JJR limit_NN1 of_IO integration_NN1 -_- which_DDQ captures_VVZ both_RR of_IO those_DD2 definitions_NN2 for_IF different_JJ values_NN2 of_IO the_AT parameter_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bottomley_NP1 (_( 1994_MC )_) during_II the_AT era_NN1 was_VBDZ at_II a_AT1 loss_NN1 to_TO explain_VVI the_AT marginalisation_NN1 of_IO older_JJR women_NN2 in_II feminist_JJ discourse_NN1 ,_, '_NULL the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO elderly_JJ women_NN2 is_VBZ remarkable_JJ ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 we_PPIS2 all_DB have_VH0 mothers_NN2 -_- at_RR21 least_RR22 -_- and_CC that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR all_DB likely_JJ to_TO age_VVI '_NULL (_( 68_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, this_DD1 claim_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI made_VVN a_JJ21 priori_JJ22 ,_, it_PPH1 must_VM be_VBI preceded_VVN by_II an_AT1 analysis_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 particular_JJ argument_NN1 and_CC specification_NN1 of_IO the_AT function_NN1 of_IO the_AT quasi-logical_JJ elements_NN2 in_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, Cone_NN1 passionately_RR claims_VVZ that_CST '_NULL &lsqb;_( a_ZZ1 &rsqb;_) ll_NNU ideas_NN2 which_DDQ are_VBR opposed_VVN to_II the_AT struggle_NN1 for_IF black_JJ self-determination_NN1 or_CC are_VBR irrelevant_JJ to_II it_PPH1 must_VM be_VBI rejected_VVN as_II the_AT work_NN1 of_IO the_AT Antichrist_NN1 '_NULL (_( 1969_MC ,_, 120_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Famously_RR ,_, Knobe_NP1 showed_VVD that_CST more_DAR people_NN would_VM ascribe_VVI intentional_JJ action_NN1 to_II someone_PN1 in_II a_AT1 case_NN1 involving_VVG harming_JJ than_CSN in_II an_AT1 otherwise_RR identical_JJ case_NN1 involving_VVG helping_NN1 (_( Intention_NN1 ,_, Intentional_JJ Action_NN1 ,_, and_CC Moral_JJ Considerations_NN2 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Once_RR21 again_RR22 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ no_AT unique_JJ answer_NN1 and_CC various_JJ contradicting_JJ opinions_NN2 are_VBR juxtaposed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
OCA_NP1 surrounding_VVG a_AT1 woman_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 right_JJ to_TO wear_VVI the_AT hijab_NN1 in_II the_AT workplace_NN1 appears_VVZ strained_JJ because_CS there_EX is_VBZ little_DA1 agreement_NN1 within_II Muslim_JJ communities_NN2 as_II21 to_II22 what_DDQ the_AT Qur_NN1 '_NULL anic_JJ mandate_NN1 on_II modesty_NN1 entails_VVZ (_( i.e._REX the_AT Great_JJ Hijab_NN1 Debate_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, using_VVG R_ZZ1 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM straightforwardly_RR handle_VVI propositions_NN2 of_IO the_AT form_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, New_JJ Qing_JJ History_NN1 stubbornly_RR upholds_VVZ the_AT preposterous_JJ historical_JJ view_NN1 of_IO "_" decentralization_NN1 "_" (_( qu_NN1 zhongxin_NN1 hua_NN1 ;_; )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, this_DD1 inversion_NN1 is_VBZ then_RT accompanied_VVN by_II another_DD1 inversion_NN1 based_VVN on_II the_AT enlightened_JJ and_CC educated_JJ reputation_NN1 of_IO monologic_JJ dialogue_NN1 to_TO speak_VVI about_II Right_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS neither_DD1 kind_NN1 of_IO structure_NN1 has_VHZ effects_NN2 for_IF which_DDQ it_PPH1 was_VBDZ recently_RR selected_VVN ,_, neither_DD1 has_VHZ selected_VVN effect_NN1 functions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, this_DD1 paper_NN1 has_VHZ argued_VVN that_CST an_AT1 approach_NN1 based_VVN on_II processes_NN2 of_IO identity-formation_NN1 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 monolithic_JJ ,_, pre-existing_NN1 ,_, and_CC a-historical_JJ identities_NN2 ,_, has_VHZ important_JJ consequences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II her_APPGE account_NN1 ,_, a_JJ21 priori_JJ22 analogical_JJ arguments_NN2 amount_NN1 to_II a_AT1 special_JJ type_NN1 of_IO inference_NN1 precisely_RR because_CS they_PPHS2 can_VM be_VBI conclusively_RR valid_JJ in_II absence_NN1 of_IO universal_JJ premises_NN2 -which_DDQ ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, she_PPHS1 admits_VVZ ,_, may_VM be_VBI "_" implied_VVN by_II the_AT argument_NN1 "_" (_( Govier_NP1 ,_, 1989_MC :_: 148_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Concerning_II truth_NN1 and_CC rightness_NN1 ,_, Nelson_NP1 Goodman_NP1 has_VHZ argued_VVN ,_, "_" Truth_NN1 is_VBZ often_RR inapplicable_JJ ,_, is_VBZ seldom_RR sufficient_JJ ,_, and_CC must_VM sometimes_RT give_VVI way_NN1 to_II competing_JJ criteria_NN2 "_" (_( Goodman_NP1 1978_MC :_: 107_MC ;_; cf._VV0 19_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II my_APPGE own_DA lights_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 could_VM turn_VVI out_RP that_DD1 future_JJ sequels_NN2 reveal_VV0 that_CST Vader_NP1 is_VBZ not_XX in_II fact_NN1 Luke_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 father_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ case_NN1 (_( A_ZZ1 )_) would_VM indeed_RR be_VBI false_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 the_AT Chinese_JJ metaphysics_NN2 based_VVN on_II the_AT unity_NN1 of_IO substance_NN1 and_CC function_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 may_VM say_VVI that_DD1 wen_NN1 and_CC dao_NN1 are_VBR one_PN1 in_II the_AT same_DA thing_NN1 though_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR two_MC categories_NN2 with_IW two_MC names_NN2 –_- (_( the_AT unity_NN1 of_IO nature_NN1 and_CC culture_NN1 ,_, philosophy_NN1 and_CC art_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Based_VVN on_II Southern_JJ Baptist_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 interview_NN1 responses_NN2 ,_, the_AT political_JJ tenor_NN1 of_IO Gore_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 documentary_NN1 did_VDD not_XX escape_VVI their_APPGE notice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB this_DD1 work_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT literature_NN1 it_PPH1 builds_VVZ upon_II ,_, is_VBZ curiously_RR lopsided_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 haploid_JJ model_NN1 bereft_JJ of_IO all_DB the_AT complications_NN2 of_IO inheritance_NN1 that_CST typically_RR make_VV0 biological_JJ evolution_NN1 difficult_JJ to_II analyze-and_CC interesting_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_II these_DD2 aspects_NN2 correspond_VV0 "_" formal_JJ "_" and_CC "_" material_NN1 "_" conditions_NN2 of_IO the_AT "_" freedom_NN1 "_" of_IO an_AT1 action_NN1 ,_, where_CS by_II the_AT "_" freedom_NN1 "_" of_IO an_AT1 action_NN1 Fichte_NN1 means_VVZ the_AT action_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 moral_JJ worth_NN1 in_II a_AT1 familiar_JJ sense_NN1 :_: that_CST it_PPH1 be_VBI done_VDN from_II the_AT motive_NN1 of_IO duty_NN1 (_( the_AT "_" formal_JJ "_" condition_NN1 )_) and_CC that_CST it_PPH1 be_VBI what_DDQ duty_NN1 demands_NN2 (_( the_AT "_" material_NN1 "_" condition_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hypothesis_NN1 3_MC is_VBZ partly_RR supported_VVN ,_, as_CSA frequent_JJ (_( more_RRR than_CSN weekly_JJ )_) attendance_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 significant_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO reduced_JJ support_NN1 (_( Model_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Neither_DD1 tabula_NN121 rasa_NN122 nor_CC devout_JJ repetition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR two_MC reasons_NN2 why_RRQ this_DD1 phrase_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI read_VVN as_CSA evidence_NN1 for_IF the_AT common_JJ paradox_NN1 view_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 surge_NN1 in_II money-capital_NN1 was_VBDZ transferred_VVN into_II the_AT financial_JJ system_NN1 via_II a_AT1 rise_NN1 in_II average_JJ corporate_JJ reserves_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Mengzi_NN2 ,_, in_II this_DD1 light_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ playing_VVG on_II yuan_NNU '_NULL s_ZZ1 semantic_JJ range_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO preserving_JJ equipoise_NN1 is_VBZ also_RR considerably_RR greater_JJR ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 retains_VVZ the_AT classic_JJ liberal_JJ ideal_JJ that_CST civil_JJ society_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 realm_NN1 of_IO rational_JJ dialogue_NN1 between_II different_JJ individuals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR dead_JJ monkeys_NN2 and_CC dead_JJ dogs_NN2 would_VM be_VBI superior_JJ to_II a_AT1 living_JJ person_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Earthworms_NN2 ,_, snails_NN2 ,_, starfish_NN ,_, barnacles_NN2 ,_, sea_NN1 anemones_NN2 and_CC many_DA2 deep_JJ sea_NN1 fish_NN are_VBR hermaphrodites_NN2 :_: simultaneously_RR male_JJ and_CC female_NN1 (_( Roughgarden_NP1 2004_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Aristotle_NP1 also_RR considers_VVZ gender_NN1 a_AT1 limiting_JJ factor_NN1 ,_, leaving_VVG proper_JJ upbringing-as_CSA he_PPHS1 discusses_VVZ it-an_AT1 opportunity_NN1 only_RR for_IF freeborn_JJ males_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Positively_RR defining_VVG the_AT emergence_NN1 taxa_NN2 identified_VVN in_II Sect._NP1 3_MC then_RT requires_VVZ the_AT identification_NN1 of_IO metaphysical_JJ relations_NN2 that_CST adequately_RR capture_VV0 Dup_NP1 and_CC Ddown_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT two_MC inclusive_RA values_NN2 are_VBR ,_, "_" To_TO be_VBI a_AT1 good_JJ Christian_JJ ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO love_VVI your_APPGE neighbor_NN1 as_CSA yourself_PPX1 ;_; "_" and_CC "_" To_TO be_VBI a_AT1 good_JJ Christian_JJ ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO invite_VVI others_NN2 to_II church_NN1 even_CS21 if_CS22 the_AT church_NN1 changes_NN2 as_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Connor_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 work_VV0 here_RL seems_VVZ to_TO carry_VVI on_RP the_AT tradition_NN1 of_IO Barthes_NP1 ,_, who_PNQS in_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 his_APPGE work_NN1 on_II soap_NN1 ,_, picks_VVZ out_RP a_AT1 great_JJ example_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 senstance_NN1 in_RP "_" Towards_II a_AT1 Psychosociology_NN1 of_IO Contemporary_JJ Food_NN1 Consumption_NN1 ,_, "_" Barthes_NP1 discusses_VVZ the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO "_" crispness_NN1 ,_, "_" which_DDQ he_PPHS1 names_VVZ as_II an_AT1 instance_NN1 of_IO "_" a_AT1 certain_JJ '_NULL spirit_NN1 '_NULL of_IO food_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, "_" The_AT Dao_NN1 of_IO Heaven_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX compete_VVI ;_; yet_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ good_JJ at_II winning_VVG victory_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT main_JJ theoretical_JJ and_CC practical_JJ focus_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 paper_NN1 is_VBZ on_II the_AT Catholic_JJ mother-daughter_JJ relationship_NN1 ,_, and_CC how_RRQ connections_NN2 between_II women_NN2 shape_NN1 ,_, and_CC are_VBR shaped_VVN in_RP ,_, and_CC through_II this_DD1 nexus_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ something_PN1 special_JJ about_II the_AT function_NN1 space_NN1 between_II <T>_FO and_CC <T>_FO :_: the_AT members_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 set_NN1 of_IO functions_NN2 are_VBR minimal_JJ PoOT_NN1 grammars_NN2 satisfying_VVG the_AT ERC_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Clause_NN1 2_MC is_VBZ immediate_JJ from_II clause_NN1 1_MC1 by_II Proposition_NN1 3.7_MC ,_, thus_RR it_PPH1 suffices_VVZ to_TO prove_VVI clause_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Where_CS modernism_NN1 and_CC postwar_JJ era_NN1 arts_NN2 were_VBDR previously_RR almost_RR solely_RR associated_VVN with_IW a_AT1 Western_JJ dominance_NN1 and_CC the_AT notorious_JJ transfer_NN1 of_IO power_NN1 from_II Paris_NP1 to_II New_NP1 York_NP1 ,_, a_AT1 whole_JJ field_NN1 of_IO study_NN1 is_VBZ growing_VVG around_RP global_JJ modernisms_NN2 recognizing_VVG the_AT presence_NN1 and_CC formative_JJ significance_NN1 of_IO modernist_JJ culture_NN1 far_RR from_II the_AT Western_JJ metropoles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT component_NN1 for_IF line_NN1 i_ZZ1 (_( 1<_FO i<_FO n_ZZ1 )_) will_VM be_VBI 0_MC if_CS it_PPH1 was_VBDZ produced_VVN by_II B_ZZ1 rather_II21 than_II22 A_ZZ1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT measure_NN1 pertains_VVZ only_RR to_II A_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 messages_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL '_NULL s_ZZ1 Levy_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 2011_MC ,_, p._NN1 36_MC )_) presentation_NN1 of_IO the_AT control_NN1 theory_NN1 ,_, what_DDQ he_PPHS1 calls_VVZ "_" non-chancy_JJ luck_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE significance_NN1 ,_, you_PPY might_VM say_VVI ,_, would_VM be_VBI crushed_VVN by_II beauty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. Higgs_NP1 particles_NN2 can_VM be_VBI found_VVN at_II the_AT LHC_NP1 in_II a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO different_JJ scattering_NN1 processes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR the_AT instantaneous_JJ velocity_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX depend_VVI on_II any_DD particular_JJ choice_NN1 of_IO e_ZZ1 or_CC any_DD particular_JJ neighborhood_NN1 given_VVN by_II a_AT1 particular_JJ 5_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR every_AT1 individual-and_CC I_PPIS1 myself_PPX1 am_VBM one_MC1 of_IO those_DD2 individuals-measured_JJ duration_NN1 by_II the_AT revolution_NN1 he_PPHS1 had_VHD accomplished_VVN not_XX only_RR round_II himself_PPX1 but_CCB round_JJ others_NN2 and_CC notably_RR by_II the_AT positions_NN2 he_PPHS1 had_VHD successively_RR occupied_VVN with_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 myself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Baptist_JJ growth_NN1 took_VVD off_RP in_II the_AT 1920s_MC2 and_CC 1930s_MC2 ,_, more_RGR so_RR in_II "_" prosperous_JJ suburban_JJ districts_NN2 than_CSN in_II rural_JJ areas_NN2 "_" (_( Kessler_NP1 1967_MC ,_, p._NN1 265_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT other_JJ direction_NN1 ,_, suppose_VV0 0_MC A._NNU Then_RT by_II Lemma_NN1 15(c)_FO there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 complete_JJ and_CC consistent_JJ such_CS21 that_CS22 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 would_VM also_RR need_VVI to_TO be_VBI informed_VVN of_IO the_AT reason_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 imbalance_NN1 ,_, the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 will_VM change_VVI irregularly_RR based_VVN on_II accumulating_VVG data_NN throughout_II the_AT duration_NN1 of_IO the_AT trial_NN1 ,_, and_CC that_CST even_CS21 though_CS22 sufficient_JJ information_NN1 had_VHD become_VVN available_JJ to_TO alter_VVI the_AT randomization_NN1 scheme_NN1 they_PPHS2 could_VM be_VBI randomized_VVN to_II what_DDQ the_AT computer_NN1 now_RT has_VHZ calculated_VVN as_RG more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI the_AT inferior_JJ therapy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 are_VBR consistent_JJ with_IW previous_JJ work_NN1 from_II the_AT National_JJ Survey_NN1 of_IO Black_JJ Americans_NN2 (_( Taylor_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2004_MC )_) as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 other_JJ surveys_NN2 (_( Chatters_NN2 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1999_MC )_) indicating_VVG a_AT1 consistent_JJ pattern_NN1 of_IO positive_JJ age_NN1 relationships_NN2 for_IF religious_JJ participation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, in_II England_NP1 the_AT particular_JJ formation_NN1 of_IO the_AT state_NN1 ,_, the_AT distinctive_JJ relation_NN1 between_II aristocracy_NN1 and_CC monarchy_NN1 ,_, the_AT unity_NN1 of_IO Parliament_NN1 and_CC Crown_NN1 ,_, the_AT evolution_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 unified_JJ system_NN1 of_IO law_NN1 on_II which_DDQ the_AT ruling_JJ class_NN1 depended_VVD to_TO sustain_VVI its_APPGE property_NN1 and_CC power_NN1 ,_, created_VVD a_AT1 system_NN1 in_II which_DDQ corporate_JJ principles_NN2 were_VBDR weak_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT concept_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 logically_RR possible_JJ worlds_NN2 plays_VVZ an_AT1 important_JJ role_NN1 here_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 stage_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 believe_VV0 ,_, presupposes_VVZ the_AT learning_NN1 and_CC achievements_NN2 of_IO the_AT prior_JJ stages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 scholars_NN2 notice_VV0 that_CST when_CS section_NN1 34_MC treats_VVZ dao_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 also_RR employs_VVZ "_" constantly_RR not_XX possessing_VVG desire_NN1 ,_, "_" asserting_VVG that_CST "_" constantly_RR not_XX possessing_VVG desire_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 could_VM be_VBI named_VVN '_NULL small_JJ ._. '_NULL "_" 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT sake_NN1 of_IO concreteness_NN1 ,_, let_VV0 us_PPIO2 consider_VVI the_AT approach_NN1 of_IO Ashtekar_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CS31 far_CS32 as_CS33 the_AT pure_JJ logic_NN1 of_IO ground_NN1 is_VBZ concerned_JJ there_EX might_VM be_VBI no_AT basic_JJ explanatory_JJ inferences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 will_VM now_RT expend_VVI some_DD effort_NN1 explaining_VVG this_DD1 more_RGR expansive_JJ notion_NN1 of_IO equivalence_NN1 ;_; to_TO do_VDI so_RR will_VM require_VVI that_CST we_PPIS2 enter_VV0 into_II the_AT framework_NN1 of_IO many-sorted_JJ logic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD of_IO all_DB ,_, the_AT seamless_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO the_AT mind_NN1 and_CC the_AT world_NN1 in_II Zhan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 redefinition_NN1 of_IO the_AT mind_NN1 overcame_VVD the_AT gulf_NN1 between_II subject_NN1 and_CC object_VV0 that_CST "_" vulgar_JJ learning_NN1 "_" engendered_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO note_VVI that_DD1 concordance_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 given_JJ trait_NN1 even_RR in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO MZ_NP1 twins_NN2 could_VM be_VBI due_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 shared_JJ environment_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 to_II shared_JJ heredity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 from_II <_FO is_VBZ assumed_VVN to_TO be_VBI identified_VVN with_IW a_AT1 natural_JJ number_NN1 so_CS21 that_CS22 all_DB the_AT basic_JJ operations_NN2 on_II strings_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 length_NN1 →_NULL |_NULL |_NULL and_CC concatenation_NN1 (_( ,_, τ_NULL )_) →_NULL τ_NULL are_VBR computable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 growing_JJ block_NN1 theorists_NN2 the_AT spatio-temporal_JJ world_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 growing_JJ four-dimensional_JJ block_NN1 ,_, where_CS past_RL and_CC present_NN1 (_( but_CCB no_AT future_NN1 )_) objects_NN2 exist_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST in_II expositing_VVG Chomsky_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 view_VV0 here_RL ,_, I_PPIS1 have_VH0 been_VBN talking_VVG about_II words_NN2 being_VBG used_VVN to_TO refer_VVI and_CC not_XX words_NN2 referring_VVG or_CC having_VHG referents_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA "_" primitives_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 new_JJ sensibility_NN1 ,_, "_" Futurists_NN2 and_CC ISIS_NP1 decide_VV0 to_TO transform_VVI horror_NN1 "_" into_II elation_NN1 ,_, but_CCB elation_NN1 so_RG extreme_JJ that_CST it_PPH1 suggests_VVZ horror_NN1 "_" (_( Rainey_NP1 ,_, Poggi_NP1 ,_, and_CC Wittman_NP1 2009_MC ,_, 6_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Wall_NN1 Drawing_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX ephemeral_JJ ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ temporary_JJ ;_; and_CC although_CS each_DD1 mural_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 solid_JJ material_NN1 entity_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ replaceable_JJ in_CS21 that_CS22 it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI removed_VVN and_CC re-executed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT judge_NN1 inferred_VVN from_II this_DD1 that_CST it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI a_AT1 "_" paradox_NN1 "_" if_CS journalists_NN2 consciously_RR distorted_VVN a_AT1 message_NN1 while_CS at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 conforming_VVG in_II their_APPGE daily_JJ life_NN1 to_II the_AT distorted_JJ rather_II21 than_II22 the_AT original_JJ message_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Just_RR as_CSA it_PPH1 is_VBZ crucial_JJ to_TO place_VVI Lenin_NP1 in_II his_APPGE context_NN1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO understand_VVI the_AT Leninism_NN1 of_IO Lenin_NP1 ,_, so_RR should_VM Lih_NP1 be_VBI seen_VVN within_II the_AT larger_JJR context_NN1 of_IO Lenin_NP1 Studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 field_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT seminary_NN1 resides-the_AT religious_JJ field-contains_VVZ all_DB of_IO the_AT congregations_NN2 ,_, denominations_NN2 ,_, parachurch_VV0 agencies_NN2 ,_, and_CC other_JJ religious_JJ organizations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Why_RRQ should_VM there_EX be_VBI a_AT1 point_NN1 at_II which_DDQ this_DD1 measure_NN1 crosses_VVZ a_AT1 morally_RR crucial_JJ boundary_NN1 ,_, giving_VVG rise_NN1 to_II a_AT1 "_" veto_NN1 "_" of_IO the_AT no_NN1 aggregative_JJ approach_NN1 over_II the_AT aggregative_JJ approach_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Shun_NN1 to_TO confer_VVI territories_NN2 to_II his_APPGE brother_NN1 ,_, Xiang_NP1 ,_, is_VBZ a_AT1 form_NN1 of_IO political_JJ wisdom_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR a_AT1 reference_NN1 class_NN1 determined_VVN by_II my_APPGE own_DA status_NN1 as_CSA observer_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 inappropriate_JJ one_PN1 to_TO use_VVI in_II assessing_VVG the_AT evidential_JJ import_NN1 of_IO my_APPGE observation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO satisfy_VVI it_PPH1 ,_, models_NN2 of_IO concept_NN1 formation_NN1 and_CC application_NN1 should_VM include_VVI the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO factors_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 goals_NN2 and_CC background_NN1 knowledge_NN1 on_II the_AT selection_NN1 of_IO relevant_JJ properties_NN2 (_( and_CC correlations_NN2 of_IO properties_NN2 )_) for_IF similarity_NN1 judgements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT government_NN1 is_VBZ revolutionary_JJ ,_, workers_NN2 are_VBR presumably_RR carrying_VVG out_RP a_AT1 socialist_JJ revolution_NN1 and_CC building_NN1 socialism_NN1 ;_; but_CCB only_RR provisionally_RR ;_; eventually_RR relinquishing_VVG power_NN1 to_II the_AT bourgeoisie_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR several_DA2 possibilities_NN2 ,_, depending_II21 on_II22 the_AT main_JJ connective_NN1 of_IO ?_? ,_, but_CCB all_DB can_VM be_VBI treated_VVN in_II a_AT1 similar_JJ way_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 short_RR22 ,_, the_AT development_NN1 of_IO Portuguese_JJ nationalism_NN1 ,_, associated_VVN as_CSA it_PPH1 was_VBDZ with_IW the_AT historical_JJ fact_NN1 that_CST Portugal_NP1 remained_VVD ,_, until_CS the_AT mid-1970s_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 colonial_JJ power_NN1 ,_, suffered_VVN from_II the_AT same_DA flaw_NN1 that_CST Marx_NP1 considered_VVD ,_, time_RR31 and_RR32 again_RR33 ,_, to_TO be_VBI the_AT bane_NN1 of_IO French_JJ politics_NN1 :_: the_AT tradition_NN1 of_IO the_AT dead_JJ generations_NN2 weighing_VVG like_II a_AT1 nightmare_NN1 on_II the_AT mind_NN1 of_IO the_AT living_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, let_VV0 us_PPIO2 call_VVI p(Ei)_NN2 :_: =_FO 1/o(Ei)_FU the_AT betting_NN1 quotients_NN2 on_II Et_FW ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS one_PN1 accepts_VVZ the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST the_AT law_NN1 claims_VVZ robust_JJ normativity_NN1 ,_, then_RT metalegal_JJ inquiry_NN1 will_VM be_VBI a_AT1 branch_NN1 of_IO metanormative_JJ inquiry_NN1 in_II the_AT narrow_JJ sense_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT proclamations_NN2 were_VBDR a_AT1 call_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 struggle_NN1 against_II harm_NN1 and_CC exploitation_NN1 ,_, poverty_NN1 and_CC degradation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, a_AT1 paradox_NN1 arises_VVZ when_RRQ one_PN1 claims_VVZ that_CST one_PN1 can_VM not_XX speak_VVI of_IO anything_PN1 that_CST exists_VVZ ,_, and_CC yet_RR at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 speaks_VVZ of_IO these_DD2 things_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II both_DB2 Tang_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 writings_NN2 and_CC the_AT joint_JJ statement_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 Confucian_JJ scholars_NN2 are_VBR speaking_VVG from_II the_AT perspective_NN1 of_IO one_PN1 who_PNQS identifies_VVZ with_IW the_AT cultural_JJ heritage_NN1 of_IO China_NP1 ,_, viewing_VVG it_PPH1 as_CSA one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 and_CC dedicating_VVG oneself_PNX1 to_II its_APPGE continuation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA there_RL truly_RR is_VBZ an_AT1 overlap_NN1 between_II nationalism_NN1 and_CC patriotism-there_EX are_VBR also_RR sensitive_JJ places-this_DD1 is_VBZ probably_RR the_AT reason_NN1 that_CST official_JJ documents_NN2 in_II China_NP1 continually_RR maintain_VV0 an_AT1 interested_JJ and_CC sensible_JJ silence_NN1 toward_II nationalism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD things_NN2 are_VBR important_JJ for_IF us-important_JJ with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 us_PPIO2 and_CC our_APPGE good_JJ ,_, and_CC thus_RR deserve_VV0 special_JJ attention_NN1 from_II our_APPGE personal_JJ standpoint_NN1 (_( though_CS they_PPHS2 needn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 in_II fact_NN1 receive_VV0 that_CST attention-they_PPHS2 may_VM not_XX be_VBI actually_RR important_JJ to_II us_PPIO2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 take_VV0 this_DD1 to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 friendly_JJ assumption_NN1 since_CS ,_, while_CS the_AT explanation_NN1 I_PPIS1 will_VM offer_VVI below_RL is_VBZ neutral_JJ between_II the_AT knowledge_NN1 norm_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE rivals_NN2 ,_, the_AT pessimist_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 explanation_NN1 is_VBZ clearly_RR in_II tension_NN1 with_IW some_DD leading_JJ rivals_NN2 to_II the_AT knowledge_NN1 norm_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_RL seem_VV0 to_TO be_VBI at_RR21 least_RR22 five_MC senses_NN2 of_IO such_DA impossibility_NN1 in_II Walton_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 book_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 assumption_NN1 about_II chance_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ implicitly_RR made_VVN when_CS we_PPIS2 use_VV0 numbers_NN2 like_II real_JJ numbers_NN2 as_CSA measures_NN2 of_IO chance_NN1 is_VBZ worth_II making_VVG explicit_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT main_JJ difference_NN1 between_II titled_JJ and_CC untitled_JJ pieces_NN2 in_II a_AT1 similar_JJ genre_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST some_DD pieces_NN2 ,_, while_CS indistinguishable_JJ musically_RR from_II pure_JJ instrumental_JJ music_NN1 ,_, also_RR have_VH0 extra-musical_JJ representational_JJ content_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ signalled_VVN by_II the_AT title_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 would_VM like_VVI to_TO stress_VVI that_DD1 ,_, while_CS quantum_NN1 tests_NN2 do_VD0 share_VVI some_DD formal_JJ features_NN2 with_IW purely_RR epistemic/doxastic_JJ actions_NN2 in_II Belief_NN1 Revision_NN1 theory_NN1 and_CC public_JJ announcement_NN1 operators_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR not_XX trying_VVG to_TO explain_VVI quantum_NN1 behavior_NN1 as_II a_AT1 purely_RR epistemic_JJ or_CC informational_JJ artifact_NN1 (_( as_CSA some_DD other_JJ authors_NN2 have_VH0 attempted_VVN ,_, e.g._REX )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, (_( ii_MC )_) no_AT world_NN1 belonging_VVG to_II some_DD proposition_NN1 being_VBG thought_VVN at_II that_DD1 world_NN1 is_VBZ well-founded_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Predominantly_RR ,_, that_DD1 is_VBZ where_RRQ normative_JJ theorists_NN2 are_VBR from_II and_CC our_APPGE primary_JJ target_NN1 audience_NN1 would_VM be_VBI similarly_RR situated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT defining_JJ aim_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 handbook_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO provide_VVI a_AT1 concise_JJ and_CC comprehensive_JJ overview_NN1 of_IO the_AT existing_JJ knowledge_NN1 on_II a_AT1 particular_JJ topic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II modern_JJ society_NN1 ,_, the_AT proletariat_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT majority_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 Zhan_NP1 ,_, learning_VVG that_CST abandoned_VVD social_JJ service_NN1 and_CC book_NN1 learning_NN1 was_VBDZ "_" Buddhistic_JJ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Commentators_NN2 have_VH0 described_VVN how_RRQ an_AT1 '_NULL attentive_JJ '_NULL segment_NN1 of_IO the_AT population-less_DAR than_CSN 20%-has_FO sufficient_JJ knowledge_NN1 of_IO and_CC interest_NN1 in_II science_NN1 to_TO assess_VVI issues_NN2 that_CST are_VBR characterized_VVN by_II complexity_NN1 and_CC expert_NN1 uncertainty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT beginning_NN1 of_IO the_AT film_NN1 ,_, the_AT pictures_NN2 of_IO the_AT landscape_NN1 ,_, the_AT stony_JJ roads_NN2 along_II which_DDQ Helena_NP1 cycles_NN2 and_CC the_AT modest_JJ wooden_JJ houses_NN2 ,_, have_VH0 the_AT realistic_JJ function_NN1 of_IO introducing_VVG the_AT setting_NN1 of_IO the_AT story_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 this_DD1 case_NN1 is_VBZ presented_VVN by_II Stecker_NP1 himself_PPX1 as_CSA one_PN1 in_II which_DDQ a_AT1 non-artistic_JJ value_NN1 seems_VVZ (_( at_RR21 first_RR22 blush_VV0 ,_, at_RR21 least_RR22 )_) to_TO pass_VVI his_APPGE test_NN1 for_IF being_VBG artistic_JJ ,_, this_DD1 indicates_VVZ that_CST Stecker_NP1 is_VBZ here_RL presupposing_VVG that_DD1 to_TO appreciate_VVI a_AT1 value_NN1 possessed_VVN by_II a_AT1 work_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 must_VM know_VVI why_RRQ it_PPH1 has_VHZ this_DD1 sentimental_JJ value_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 was_VBDZ probably_RR assumed_VVN that_CST the_AT context_NN1 was_VBDZ that_DD1 of_IO a_AT1 persuasion_NN1 dialogue_NN1 or_CC an_AT1 inquiry_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Against_II this_DD1 ,_, it_PPH1 could_VM be_VBI pointed_VVN out_RP that_CST in_II the_AT first_MD volume_NN1 (_( §3_FO ,_, We_PPIS2 now_RT show_VV0 that<_FO is_VBZ anti-reflexive_JJ and_CC transitive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, Mengzi_NP1 recognizes_VVZ the_AT ill_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO yuan_NNU ,_, yet_RR he_PPHS1 defends_VVZ its_APPGE importance_NN1 in_II reacting_VVG to_TO harm_VVI offered_VVN by_II those_DD2 who_PNQS are_VBR supposed_JJ to_TO care_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Terminology_NN1 and_CC operations_NN2 from_II the_AT physical_JJ individuation_NN1 of_IO matter_NN1 ,_, crystals_NN2 specifically_RR ,_, become_VV0 the_AT basis_NN1 for_IF the_AT investigation_NN1 of_IO psychic_JJ or_CC collective_JJ individuation_NN1 ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 it_PPH1 is_VBZ to_TO ultimately_RR stress_VVI the_AT differences_NN2 between_II the_AT successive_JJ individuations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lin_NP1 Biao_NP1 was_VBDZ henceforth_RT identified_VVN not_XX as_II a_AT1 "_" leftist_NN1 "_" but_CCB as_II an_AT1 "_" extreme_JJ rightist_NN1 "_" deviationist_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT First_MD Emperor_NN1 ,_, with_IW whom_PNQO Mao_NP1 openly_RR identified_VVN himself_PPX1 ,_, was_VBDZ no_RR21 longer_RR22 to_TO be_VBI criticized_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Insofar_CS21 as_CS22 someone_PN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 good_JJ artist_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 would_VM understand_VVI the_AT subject_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE work_NN1 ,_, possess_VV0 the_AT skill_NN1 to_TO produce_VVI it_PPH1 well_RR ,_, and_CC desire_NN1 to_TO make_VVI it_PPH1 as_RG beautiful_JJ as_CSA possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Especially_RR because_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 very_JJ leftist_NN1 country_NN1 ,_, and_CC they_PPHS2 felt_VVD like_CS we_PPIS2 had_VHD an_AT1 agenda_NN1 as_CSA American_JJ academics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Modally_RR Robust_JJ Act_NN1 Consequentialism_NN1 would_VM have_VHI found_VVN fault_NN1 with_IW b_ZZ1 for_IF one_MC1 of_IO two_MC reasons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
State_VV0 agencies_NN2 could_VM adopt_VVI or_CC strengthen_VVI pol_NN1 ?_? icies_NN2 to_TO contract_VVI with_IW firms_NN2 that_CST are_VBR racially_RR inclusive_JJ or_CC ,_, at_RR21 least_RR22 ,_, sincerely_RR seek_VV0 to_TO be_VBI through_II internal_JJ mandate_NN1 that_CST minority_NN1 candidates_NN2 must_VM be_VBI in_RP ?_? terviewed_VVD (_( a_AT1 practice_NN1 adopted_VVD ,_, e.g._REX ,_, by_II the_AT National_JJ Football_NN1 League_NN1 )_) and_CC actual_JJ hires_NN2 charted_VVN over_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR long_RR as_CSA we_PPIS2 interpret_VV0 Burgess_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 challenge_VV0 as_II the_AT demand_NN1 that_CST there_EX be_VBI some_DD valid_JJ ,_, fully_RR general_JJ ,_, structurally_RR legitimate_JJ discernability_NN1 principle_NN1 ,_, the_AT existence_NN1 of_IO distinct_JJ but_CCB absolutely_RR indiscernible_JJ objects_NN2 like_II i_ZZ1 and_CC j_ZZ1 present_VV0 no_AT problem_NN1 for_IF the_AT ante_FW rem_NN1 structuralist_NN1 and_CC the_AT challenge_NN1 is_VBZ met_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR the_AT passage_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX support_VVI the_AT Platonist_NN1 or_CC Divine_JJ Intellect_NN1 view_NN1 over_II the_AT Human_JJ Intellect_NN1 one_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT plan_NN1 for_IF the_AT article_NN1 is_VBZ as_CSA follows_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ about_II a_AT1 mixed_JJ approach_NN1 then_RT :_: GRW_NP1 talks_NN2 about_II primitive_JJ chance_NN1 ,_, while_CS the_AT other_JJ theories_NN2 talk_VV0 about_II best-systems_NN2 probabilities_NN2 or_CC epistemic_JJ probabilities_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS the_AT question_NN1 of_IO metarepresentation_NN1 has_VHZ not_XX been_VBN canvassed_VVN in_II the_AT RPE_NN1 literature_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 has_VHZ been_VBN much_RR discussed_VVN in_II the_AT literature_NN1 on_II '_NULL metacognition_NN1 ,_, in_II non-human_JJ animals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II this_DD1 he_PPHS1 was_VBDZ underlining_VVG the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST the_AT power_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 saint_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX derive_VVI from_II his_APPGE ability_NN1 to_TO write_VVI books_NN2 ,_, or_CC study_VV0 complex_JJ mystical_JJ treaties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ is_VBZ again_RT unclear_JJ is_VBZ what_DDQ the_AT size_NN1 or_CC age_NN1 of_IO the_AT universe_NN1 has_VHZ got_VVN to_TO do_VDI with_IW any_DD of_IO that_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT special_JJ case_NN1 where_CS there_EX is_VBZ some_DD total_JJ ordering_NN1 of_IO the_AT endogenous_JJ variables_NN2 (_( the_AT ones_NN2 in_II V_ZZ1 )_) such_CS21 that_CS22 unless_CS X_ZZ1 Y_ZZ1 ,_, then_RT Y_ZZ1 is_VBZ independent_JJ of_IO X_ZZ1 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, FY_NP1 (_( ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. To_TO drive_VVI home_RL this_DD1 extension_NN1 of_IO Althusserian_JJ thought_NN1 ,_, Rodriguez_NP1 has_VHZ to_TO rethink_VVI the_AT functioning_NN1 of_IO the_AT social_JJ formation_NN1 and_CC the_AT role_NN1 of_IO ideology_NN1 within_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Efforts_NN2 by_II the_AT offender_NN1 to_TO address_VVI pain_NN1 and_CC suffering_NN1 stemming_VVG from_II wrongdoing_NN1 may_VM then_RT motivate_VVI reciprocal_JJ compassion_NN1 on_II41 the_II42 part_II43 of_II44 others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC sorts_NN2 of_IO studies_NN2 support_VV0 my_APPGE point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II my_APPGE reading_NN1 ,_, the_AT decay_NN1 in_II intellectual_JJ activity_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO be_VBI explained_VVN by_II the_AT decay_NN1 of_IO the_AT relevant_JJ bodily_JJ part_NN1 ,_, not_XX by_II the_AT decay_NN1 of_IO the_AT intellect_NN1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ what_DDQ Liu_NP1 Xie_NP1 meant_VVD when_RRQ he_PPHS1 said_VVD :_: "_" From_II these_DD2 things_NN2 we_PPIS2 know_VV0 that_CST Tao_NP1 is_VBZ handed_VVN down_RP in_II writing_VVG through_II sages_NN2 ,_, and_CC that_CST sages_NN2 make_VV0 Tao_NP1 manifest_VVI in_II their_APPGE writings_NN2 "_" (_( Liu_NP1 1959,12_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 suggests_VVZ that_CST the_AT reactive_JJ attitudes_NN2 are_VBR not_XX merely_RR paradigmatically_RR expressed_VVN in_II forms_NN2 of_IO communication_NN1 ,_, but_CCB rather_RR that_CST they_PPHS2 are_VBR "_" in_II some_DD elusive_JJ sense_NN1 ..._... '_NULL meant_VVD to_TO be_VBI expressed_VVN '_NULL "_" (_( 2011_MC ,_, 328_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ how_RRQ Kuruma_NP1 arrives_VVZ at_II the_AT conclusion_NN1 that_CST ,_, although_CS in_II the_AT theory_NN1 of_IO the_AT exchange_NN1 process_VV0 the_AT necessity_NN1 of_IO the_AT mediating_JJ '_NULL nature_NN1 '_NULL of_IO money_NN1 is_VBZ practically_RR reproduced_VVN ,_, the_AT mediation_NN1 of_IO the_AT two_MC different_JJ commodities_NN2 has_VHZ already_RR taken_VVN place_NN1 :_: through_II abstraction_NN1 from_II the_AT specific_JJ form_NN1 of_IO labour_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ necessary_JJ to_TO produce_VVI different_JJ use-values_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA a_AT1 representation_NN1 would_VM be_VBI absurd_JJ ,_, since_CS merely_RR to_TO accumulate_VVI capital_NN1 would_VM suffice_VVI for_IF drawing_VVG further_JJR profits_NN2 from_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO prove_VVI this_DD1 ,_, we_PPIS2 shall_VM need_VVI the_AT following_JJ lemma_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 useful_JJ application_NN1 of_IO scoring_VVG rules_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST they_PPHS2 allow_VV0 us_PPIO2 to_TO quantify_VVI the_AT value_NN1 of_IO information_NN1 for_IF various_JJ propositions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Wide-scope_NN1 '_NULL ought_VMK '_NULL :_: You_PPY ought_VMK to_TO make_VVI sure_JJ that_CST ,_, if_CS you_PPY will_VM not_XX see_VVI your_APPGE doctor_NN1 ,_, you_PPY do_VD0 not_XX take_VVI a_AT1 day_NNT1 off_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ arguments_NN2 ,_, while_CS we_PPIS2 acknowledge_VV0 that_CST the_AT evidence_NN1 is_VBZ incomplete_JJ ,_, we_PPIS2 focus_VV0 on_II what_DDQ we_PPIS2 have_VH0 :_: in_II these_DD2 two_MC cases_NN2 our_APPGE reason_NN1 for_IF reaching_VVG the_AT inference_NN1 we_PPIS2 reach_VV0 is_VBZ that_DD1 very_JJ lack_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II the_AT analyses_NN2 of_IO scientific_JJ representation_NN1 by_II Ron_NP1 Giere_NP1 (_( 2004_MC ,_, 2006_MC )_) and_CC Bas_NP1 van_NP1 Fraassen_NP1 (_( 2008_MC )_) show_VV0 ,_, representations_NN2 can_VM be_VBI evaluated_VVN not_XX only_RR on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO the_AT relations_NN2 that_CST they_PPHS2 bear_VV0 to_II the_AT world_NN1 but_CCB also_RR in_II31 connection_II32 with_II33 the_AT various_JJ uses_NN2 to_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 are_VBR put_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Development_NN1 actors_NN2 and_CC institutions_NN2 should_VM respect_VVI ,_, support_VVI ,_, and_CC restore_VVI both_RR of_IO these_DD2 aspects_NN2 of_IO human_JJ existence_NN1 ,_, but_CCB agency_NN1 and_CC well-being_NN1 ,_, although_CS causally_RR linked_VVN ,_, are_VBR different_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Kant_NN1 writes_VVZ in_II §47_FO ,_, aimed_VVN at_II the_AT '_NULL Elucidation_NN1 and_CC Confirmation_NN1 '_NULL of_IO the_AT earlier_JJR account_NN1 of_IO genius_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 great_JJ '_NULL mind_NN1 '_NULL differs_VVZ from_II the_AT '_NULL simpleton_NN1 '_NULL ,_, who_PNQS can_VM '_NULL never_RR do_VDI more_DAR than_CSN just_RR learn_VV0 and_CC imitate_VV0 '_NULL ,_, only_RR by_II degree_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 difference_NN1 in_II kind_NN1 between_II the_AT artist-genius_NN1 and_CC the_AT layperson_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 narrowed_VVD the_AT search_NN1 to_II the_AT neighborhood_NN1 ;_; the_AT X_ZZ1 chromosome-and_CC even_RR the_AT block_NN1 ,_, Xq28-but_CCB we_PPIS2 didn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 find_VV0 the_AT house_NN1 '_NULL (_( Hamer_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1993_MC ,_, 147_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 that_CST there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 proposition_NN1 B_ZZ1 that_CST is_VBZ true_JJ in_II every_AT1 point_NN1 in_II the_AT model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 are_VBR spread_VVN out_RP throughout_II the_AT interval_NN1 δt_FO '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 proposed_VVD public_JJ examinations_NN2 to_TO differentiate_VVI between_II '_NULL technical_JJ '_NULL and_CC '_NULL expert_NN1 '_NULL staff_NN and_CC ensure_VV0 that_CST talented_JJ administrators_NN2 could_VM rise_VVI to_II the_AT top_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR identifying_VVG a_AT1 ground_NN1 for_IF attributing_VVG value_NN1 to_II the_AT nonhuman_NN1 world_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 believe_VV0 to_TO be_VBI less_RGR controversial_JJ than_CSN the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST the_AT nonhuman_NN1 world_NN1 has_VHZ value_NN1 independently_RR of_IO whatever_DDQV value_NN1 human_JJ beings_NN2 have_VH0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR without_IW a_AT1 coincidence_NN1 between_II utilitarianism_NN1 and_CC liberalism_NN1 ,_, rule-utilitarianism_NN1 loses_VVZ its_APPGE claim_NN1 to_TO capture_VVI our_APPGE considered_JJ moral_JJ judgements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS a_AT1 human_NN1 has_VHZ the_AT moral_JJ virtues_NN2 ,_, then_RT that_DD1 human_NN1 is_VBZ morally_RR committed_VVN to_II the_AT well-being_NN1 of_IO others_NN2 and_CC the_AT well-being_NN1 of_IO the_AT polis_NN1 (_( the_AT community_NN1 )_) as_II a_AT1 whole_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO remove_VVI any_DD doubts_NN2 ,_, Rowling_NP1 could_VM make_VVI public_RR her_APPGE notes_NN2 and_CC backstory_JJ writing_NN1 that_CST clearly_RR show_VV0 that_CST she_PPHS1 had_VHD intended_VVN Dumbledore_VV0 to_TO be_VBI gay_JJ while_CS she_PPHS1 was_VBDZ writing_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT success_NN1 of_IO book_NN1 titles_NN2 from_II historian_NN1 Tony_NP1 Judt_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Postwar_JJ (_( 2005_MC )_) to_II architecture_NN1 critic_NN1 Owen_NP1 Hatherley_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Militant_JJ Modernism_NN1 (_( 2009_MC )_) also_RR point_VV0 to_II the_AT subject_NN1 of_IO the_AT postwar_JJ era_NN1 as_II an_AT1 advantage_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 a_AT1 turn-off_JJ ,_, not_XX to_TO talk_VVI of_IO retro-fascination_NN1 of_IO anything_PN1 mid-century_NNT1 modern_JJ throughout_II the_AT popular_JJ culture_NN1 ,_, where_CS the_AT postwar_JJ era_NN1 are_VBR at_II the_AT core_NN1 of_IO the_AT collective_JJ imagination_NN1 from_II subcultures_NN2 to_II cultural_JJ festivals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 means_VVZ that_CST the_AT same_DA connection_NN1 between_II fitting_JJ motives_NN2 and_CC reasons_NN2 to_TO act_VVI that_CST explains_VVZ why_RRQ there_EX are_VBR reasons_NN2 to_TO promote_VVI the_AT good_JJ equally_RR explains_VVZ the_AT connection_NN1 between_II an_AT1 act_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 moral_JJ status_NN1 and_CC reasons_NN2 for_IF or_CC against_II performing_VVG it_PPH1 quite_RG independently_RR of_IO whether_CSW the_AT act_NN1 promotes_VVZ the_AT good_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Before_II concluding_VVG ,_, let_VV0 us_PPIO2 briefly_RR mention_VVI how_RRQ the_AT two_MC previous_JJ substantialist_NN1 and_CC relationist_NN1 accounts_NN2 may_VM include_VVI the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO Goldstone_NP1 bosons_NN2 and_CC VEV_NP1 of_IO the_AT Higgs_NP1 fields_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Whether_CSW there_EX is_VBZ sameness_NN1 of_IO content_NN1 of_IO the_AT relevant_JJ sentences_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT main_JJ issue_NN1 ;_; instead_RR ,_, by_II drawing_VVG attention_NN1 to_II the_AT form_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 abstraction_NN1 principle_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 presents_VVZ us_PPIO2 with_IW an_AT1 effective_JJ means_NN for_IF introducing_VVG a_AT1 new_JJ concept.2_FO This_DD1 method_NN1 ,_, of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, does_VDZ not_XX require_VVI the_AT content_NN1 of_IO the_AT new_JJ concept_NN1 in_II (_( A2_FO )_) to_TO be_VBI identical_JJ to_II some_DD concept_NN1 that_CST figures_NN2 in_II (_( A1_FO )_) ,_, however_RR ,_, it_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX seem_VVI to_TO require_VVI either_RR that_CST the_AT two_MC sides_NN2 (_( A1_FO )_) and_CC (_( A2_FO )_) have_VH0 the_AT same_DA content_NN1 -_- there_EX is_VBZ ,_, after_II all_DB ,_, a_AT1 creative_JJ element_NN1 in_II the_AT method_NN1 of_IO splitting_VVG up_RP content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 that_CST I_PPIS1 am_VBM wealthy_JJ ,_, and_CC also_RR a_AT1 great_JJ believer_NN1 in_II lower_JJR taxes_NN2 rates_NN2 for_IF the_AT wealthy_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 framework_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, can_VM not_XX pose_VVI the_AT question_NN1 of_IO being_VBG that_DD1 appears_VVZ in_II the_AT context_NN1 of_IO Buddhistic_JJ ontology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 regard_NN1 ,_, theorizing_NN1 can_VM progress_VVI in_II the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO any_DD preexisting_JJ systematic_JJ theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 way_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 are_VBR conditional_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT supposition_NN1 of_IO the_AT arbitration_NN1 proposal_NN1 considered_VVN here_RL is_VBZ that_RG less_RGR powerful_JJ stakeholders_NN2 are_VBR unable_JK to_TO effectively_RR engage_VVI or_CC negotiate_VVI with_IW large_JJ firms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Chance_NP1 ,_, whatever_DDQV it_PPH1 is_VBZ more_RGR precisely_RR ,_, is_VBZ some_DD feature_NN1 of_IO events_NN2 that_CST comes_VVZ in_II degrees_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT measurement_NN1 of_IO chance_NN1 assigns_VVZ numbers_NN2 to_II events_NN2 in_II accordance_NN1 to_II how_RGQ likely_JJ they_PPHS2 are_VBR to_TO occur_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE Parisian_JJ sojourn_NN1 close_RR to_II completion_NN1 ,_, and_CC before_II moving_VVG on_RP to_II London_NP1 ,_, can_VM we_PPIS2 safely_RR conclude_VVI ,_, then_RT ,_, that_CST a_AT1 close_JJ reading_NN1 of_IO the_AT 1844_MC manuscripts_NN2 evidences_NN2 no_AT common_JJ denominator_NN1 with_IW those_DD2 later_JJR works_NN which_DDQ have_VH0 so_RG heavily_RR drawn_VVN upon_II them_PPHO2 to_TO denounce_VVI consumer_NN1 society_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT notion_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 '_NULL postsecular_JJ perspective_NN1 '_NULL captures_VVZ where_RRQ Hajar_NP1 is_VBZ currently_RR positioned_VVN ,_, and_CC can_VM be_VBI described_VVN as_II a_AT1 perspective_NN1 that_CST moved_VVD beyond_II uncritical_JJ antireligiosity_NN1 to_II a_AT1 more_RGR politically_RR critically_RR informed_VVN and_CC reflexive_VV0 understanding_NN1 of_IO various_JJ non-religious_JJ and_CC religious_JJ identities_NN2 and_CC practices_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II considering_VVG our_APPGE results_NN2 and_CC overall_JJ design_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 recognize_VV0 that_CST some_DD may_VM take_VVI issue_NN1 with_IW our_APPGE indirect_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO principal_JJ influence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 am_VBM not_XX warm_JJ and_CC generous_JJ simpliciter_NN1 but_CCB warm_JJ and_CC generous_JJ to_II certain_JJ people_NN ,_, and_CC other_JJ ways_NN2 to_II other_JJ people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR his_APPGE more_RGR political_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO '_NULL philosophy_NN1 as_CSA in_II the_AT last_MD instance_NN1 class_NN1 struggle_NN1 in_II the_AT field_NN1 of_IO theory_NN1 '_NULL is_VBZ presented_VVN more_RRR as_II a_AT1 negative_JJ turn_NN1 towards_II a_AT1 materialist_NN1 deconstruction_NN1 of_IO idealist_JJ positions_NN2 than_CSN as_II a_AT1 positive_JJ construction_NN1 of_IO concepts_NN2 and_CC theories_NN2 and_CC is_VBZ also_RR presented_VVN as_CSA not_XX having_VHG a_AT1 proper_JJ historicity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 might_VM think_VVI ,_, however_RR ,_, that_CST that_DD1 one_PN1 can_VM not_XX consent_VVI to_II acts_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 certain_JJ kind_NN1 ,_, ones_NN2 in_II which_DDQ in_II fact_NN1 there_RL isn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 an_AT1 option_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ a_AT1 quirk_NN1 of_IO the_AT meaning_NN1 of_IO '_NULL consent_NN1 '_NULL and_CC is_VBZ not_XX something_PN1 we_PPIS2 were_VBDR trying_VVG to_TO capture_VVI in_II our_APPGE analysis_NN1 of_IO paternalism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR it_PPH1 appears_VVZ that_CST SMR_NP1 stands_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, Sturgeon_NP1 characterizes_VVZ the_AT na_FU ?_? ve_NN1 realist_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reasoning_VVG along_RP just_RR these_DD2 lines_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, how_RRQ we_PPIS2 understand_VV0 temporal_JJ transcendence_NN1 varies_VVZ :_: it_PPH1 may_VM be_VBI restricted_VVN to_II a_AT1 future_JJ moment_NN1 ;_; it_PPH1 may_VM have_VHI been_VBN realised_VVN already_RR ,_, with_IW the_AT new_JJ age_NN1 in_II its_APPGE first_MD stages_NN2 ;_; or_CC it_PPH1 may_VM be_VBI proleptic_JJ ,_, having_VHG been_VBN inaugurated_VVN but_CCB awaiting_VVG its_APPGE fulfilment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Bishop_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 imperative_JJ ,_, a_AT1 next-level_JJ set_NN1 would_VM be_VBI a_AT1 collection_NN1 of_IO things_NN2 such_CS21 that_CS22 there_EX are_VBR '_NULL set-many_DA2 '_NULL ways_NN2 in_II which_DDQ any_DD two_MC such_DA things_NN2 can_VM be_VBI identified_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_II all_DB ,_, debts_NN2 have_VH0 to_TO be_VBI measured_VVN ;_; they_PPHS2 have_VH0 to_TO be_VBI expressed_VVN in_II some_DD agreed_JJ value_NN1 metric_JJ which_DDQ governs_VVZ their_APPGE payment_NN1 ,_, as_CSA in_II the_AT debt_NN1 of_IO sin_NN1 being_VBG measured_VVN in_II Catholicism_NN1 by_II the_AT penance_NN1 one_PN1 performs_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Total_JJ debt_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT sum_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 student_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 debt_NN1 they_PPHS2 brought_VVD with_IW them_PPHO2 into_II seminary_NN1 and_CC the_AT debt_NN1 they_PPHS2 incurred_VVD during_II seminary_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Coastlessness_NN1 not_XX only_RR isolates_VVZ them_PPHO2 from_II the_AT main_JJ trade_NN1 and_CC transport_NN1 networks_NN2 ,_, leaving_VVG them_PPHO2 at_II the_AT mercy_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE neighbours_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 also_RR acts_VVZ as_II a_AT1 barrier_NN1 reducing_VVG the_AT flow_NN1 of_IO people_NN ,_, goods_NN2 ,_, technology_NN1 and_CC ideas_NN2 ,_, thus_RR contributing_VVG to_II their_APPGE material_NN1 and_CC institutional_JJ underdevelopment_NN1 (_( Uprety_NP1 2006_MC ,_, 22_MC ;_; Collier_NP1 2007_MC ,_, 53-63_MCMC ;_; UN-OHRLLS_VVZ 2012_MC ,_, 4-5_MCMC ;_; UN-OHRLLS_VVZ 2013_MC ,_, 9-38_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB this_DD1 implies_VVZ the_AT thought_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 mutual_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II nature_NN1 and_CC human_JJ affairs_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT source_NN1 of_IO the_AT "_" Heaven_NN1 and_CC earth_NN1 interacting_JJ "_" blueprint_NN1 for_IF human_JJ society_NN1 can_VM be_VBI found_VVN in_II the_AT Commentary_NN1 on_II the_AT Changes_NN2 (_( Yizhuan_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR several_DA2 possible_JJ approaches_NN2 to_II the_AT way_NN1 such_DA "_" sentences_NN2 "_" are_VBR excluded_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, the_AT meaning_NN1 of_IO '_NULL sustainable_JJ '_NULL is_VBZ not_XX clear_RR when_CS applied_VVN to_II specific_JJ areas_NN2 of_IO human_JJ activity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM not_XX have_VHI friendship_NN1 in_II our_APPGE lives_NN2 if_CS we_PPIS2 deliberate_VV0 on_II a_AT1 case-by-case_JJ basis_NN1 about_II the_AT value_NN1 of_IO acting_VVG as_II a_AT1 friend_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 now_RT consider_VVI the_AT insights_NN2 and_CC lessons_NN2 that_CST can_VM be_VBI drawn_VVN from_II this_DD1 experience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II moral_JJ rationalism_NN1 ,_, (_( 14_MC )_) is_VBZ straightforwardly_RR false_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Very_RG often_RR this_DD1 descriptive_JJ information_NN1 allows_VVZ one_PN1 to_TO learn_VVI some_DD normative_JJ truths_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR in_RR21 particular_RR22 local_JJ chance_NN1 determination_NN1 can_VM hold_VVI even_CS21 when_CS22 chance_NN1 locality_NN1 is_VBZ false_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 of_IO the_AT reasons_NN2 given_VVN for_IF this_DD1 surprising_JJ decision_NN1 ,_, coming_VVG from_II the_AT ultimate_JJ filial_JJ son_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ that_DD1 letting_VVG his_APPGE parents_NN2 prevent_VVI his_APPGE marriage_NN1 would_VM have_VHI prevented_VVN him_PPHO1 from_II having_VHG the_AT most_RGT important_JJ of_IO human_JJ relationships_NN2 ,_, and_CC that_DD1 would_VM have_VHI caused_VVN bitterness_NN1 toward_II his_APPGE parents_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 a_AT1 symmetry_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ fixed_VVN and_CC manifest_VV0 :_: a_AT1 conservation_JJ symmetry_NN1 in_II our_APPGE terminology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, '_NULL concept_NN1 '_NULL has_VHZ been_VBN chosen_VVN instead_II21 of_II22 '_NULL perception_NN1 '_NULL in_BCL21 order_BCL22 that_CST the_AT reader_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX get_VVI confused_JJ and_CC ascribe_VVI a_AT1 mistaken_JJ receptivity_NN1 to_II ideas_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, deacon_NN1 administrators_NN2 reported_VVD their_APPGE ordination_NN1 year_NNT1 ,_, ministry_NN1 duties_NN2 ,_, and_CC length_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 living_VVG in_II their_APPGE current_JJ parish_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
My_APPGE primary_JJ goal_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO provide_VVI an_AT1 interesting_JJ alternative_NN1 for_IF understanding_VVG these_DD2 passages_NN2 that_CST deflates_VVZ their_APPGE importance_NN1 while_CS not_XX collapsing_VVG into_II the_AT intelligibility_NN1 interpretation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
She_PPHS1 engages_VVZ with_IW prominent_JJ voices_NN2 on_II each_DD1 of_IO the_AT topics_NN2 ,_, including_II not_XX only_RR infamous_JJ anti-Islamic_JJ cultural_JJ warriors_NN2 like_II Pim_NP1 Fortuyn_NP1 ,_, Ayaan_NP1 Hirsi_NP1 Ali_NP1 or_CC political_JJ writer_NN1 and_CC '_NULL liberal_JJ hawk_NN1 '_NULL Paul_NP1 Berman_NP1 ,_, but_CCB also_RR figures_VVZ much_RR closer_RRR to_II her_APPGE own_DA political_JJ and_CC intellectual_JJ milieu_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT proposional_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT system_NN1 is_VBZ sound_JJ because_CS the_AT connectives_NN2 are_VBR defined_VVN exactly_RR as_CSA the_AT classical_JJ ones_NN2 in_II the_AT trial_NN1 and_CC error_NN1 truth_NN1 definition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 rules_NN2 that_CST we_PPIS2 use_VV0 in_II temporal_JJ alethic_JJ dyadic_JJ deontic_JJ logic_NN1 are_VBR described_VVN by_II &lsqb;_( 44_MC &rsqb;_) and_CC &lsqb;_( 46_MC &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Though_CS there_EX may_VM be_VBI numerous_JJ cases_NN2 that_CST are_VBR borderline_NN1 or_CC even_RR undecidable_JJ on_II these_DD2 criteria-such_DA as_CSA innovative_JJ works_NN that_CST challenge_VV0 existing_JJ categories_NN2 and_CC open_JJ new_JJ ones-his_APPGE point_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST typically_RR at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 of_IO the_AT two_MC historical_JJ conditions_NN2 applies_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II bringing_VVG together_RL people_NN from_II across_II the_AT Americas_NP2 ,_, the_AT NEXUS_NN1 program_NN1 sought_VVD to_TO cultivate_VVI hybrid_JJ researchers-socially_RR engaged_JJ policy_NN1 informants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, our_APPGE framework_NN1 could_VM help_VVI address_NN1 criticisms_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 been_VBN leveled_VVN at_II intersectionality_NN1 theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS discrimination_NN1 and_CC hate_VV0 crimes_NN2 against_II Arabs_NN2 and_CC Muslims_NN2 became_VVD more_RRR pronounced_VVN after_II 11_MC September_NPM1 ,_, the_AT sustained_JJ economic_JJ crisis_NN1 has_VHZ also_RR contributed_VVN to_II a_AT1 rise_NN1 in_II intolerance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX because_CS one_PN1 does_VDZ not_XX care_VVI ;_; rather_RR ,_, such_DA a_AT1 detachment_NN1 aims_VVZ to_TO create_VVI a_AT1 moral_JJ space_NN1 for_IF clear_JJ conscience_NN1 so_CS21 that_CS22 a_AT1 relational_JJ virtuous_JJ action_NN1 or_CC non-action_NN1 may_VM be_VBI possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ this_DD1 reconsideration_NN1 of_IO labour_NN1 as_CSA human_JJ action_NN1 which_DDQ ,_, as_CSA anticipated_VVN above_RL ,_, allows_VVZ the_AT exposition_NN1 to_TO throw_VVI new_JJ light_NN1 on_II the_AT content_NN1 of_IO the_AT value-form_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB three_MC conditions_NN2 can_VM be_VBI experimentally_RR realized_VVN ,_, or_CC tested_VVD ,_, with_IW high_JJ reliability_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, Moon_NN1 and_CC Choi_NP1 (_( 2014_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST organizational_JJ commitment_NN1 and_CC climate_NN1 for_IF innovation_NN1 mediated_VVD the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO ethical_JJ climate_NN1 on_II organizational_JJ innovation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT bamboo_NN1 script_NN1 yin_NN1 (_( )_) in_II yin_NN1 er_FU ren_NN1 (_( )_) was_VBDZ written_VVN as_CSA ,_, which_DDQ has_VHZ been_VBN transcribed_VVN as_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 largely_RR unresolved_JJ tension_NN1 in_II Marx_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 political_JJ writings_NN2 ,_, from_II the_AT Manifesto_NN1 onward_RL ,_, between_II his_APPGE conception_NN1 that_CST the_AT working-class_JJ party_NN1 followed_VVD the_AT proletariat_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 prior_JJ organisation_NN1 into_II a_AT1 class_NN1 ,_, and_CC his_APPGE alternative_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO the_AT determining_JJ role_NN1 of_IO parties_NN2 in_II the_AT '_NULL formation_NN1 of_IO the_AT proletariat_NN1 into_II a_AT1 class_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Not_XX without_IW a_AT1 reason_NN1 Oliver_NP1 Hirschbiegel_NP1 called_VVD this_DD1 magazine_NN1 a_AT1 "_" running_JJ information_NN1 memory_NN1 ,_, "_" as_CSA it_PPH1 joined_VVD together_RL excerpts_NN2 ,_, documents_NN2 ,_, and_CC events_NN2 organized_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 "_" thematic_JJ and_CC intellectual_JJ context_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
When_CS Confucius_NP1 visited_VVD the_AT state_NN1 of_IO Wei_NP1 ,_, he_PPHS1 remarked_VVD on_II its_APPGE abundant_JJ population-a_NN1 great_JJ asset_NN1 to_II any_DD state_NN1 built_VVN upon_II agrarian_JJ prosperity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT laws_NN2 of_IO nuclear_JJ decay_NN1 are_VBR not_XX statements_NN2 about_II what_DDQ some_DD person_NN1 happens_VVZ to_TO believe_VVI ;_; they_PPHS2 can_VM be_VBI true_JJ even_CS21 if_CS22 no-one_PN1 has_VHZ the_AT relevant_JJ degrees_NN2 of_IO belief_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ climate_NN1 change_NN1 when_CS there_EX are_VBR different_JJ climates_NN2 for_IF two_MC successive_JJ time_NNT1 periods_NN2 ,_, and_CC there_EX can_VM be_VBI external_JJ climate_NN1 change_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 internal_JJ climate_NN1 change_NN1 (_( due_II21 to_II22 different_JJ initial_JJ values_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Again_RT ,_, however_RR ,_, this_DD1 seems_VVZ right_JJ to_TO me_PPIO1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 examined_VVD how_RGQ ethical_JJ climate_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN conceptualized_VVN and_CC measured_VVN in_II previous_JJ research_NN1 ,_, and_CC reviewed_VVN extant_JJ work_NN1 on_II its_APPGE antecedents_NN2 and_CC outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 two_MC claims_NN2 can_VM be_VBI refuted_VVN by_II saying_VVG that_DD1 aesthetic_JJ properties_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX exist_VVI ,_, and_CC thus_RR that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR not_XX able_JK to_TO perceive_VVI objective_JJ aesthetic_JJ qualities_NN2 like_II stunning_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT question_NN1 asked_VVD by_II Tutor_NN1 is_VBZ challenged_VVN ,_, it_PPH1 should_VM be_VBI removed_VVN from_II both_DB2 players_NN2 '_NULL ComSt_VV0 (_( this_DD1 will_VM allow_VVI us_PPIO2 to_TO ask_VVI it_PPH1 again_RT in_II further_JJR moves_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Though_CS I_PPIS1 begin_VV0 and_CC focus_VV0 my_APPGE analysis_NN1 on_II the_AT epistemic_JJ elements_NN2 of_IO trust_NN1 and_CC faith_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 think_VV0 the_AT account_NN1 provided_VVN has_VHZ the_AT tools_NN2 to_TO go_VVI beyond_II the_AT epistemic_JJ into_II the_AT non-epistemic_JJ attitudes_NN2 ,_, pragmatic_JJ ,_, and_CC existential_JJ poles_NN2 of_IO faith_NN1 that_CST an_AT1 adequate_JJ account_NN1 should_VM recognize_VVI and_CC explain_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Not_XX just_RR in_II the_AT US_NP1 ,_, but_CCB in_II other_JJ major_JJ zones_NN2 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 economy_NN1 there_EX has_VHZ recently_RR been_VBN a_AT1 widening_JJ gap_NN1 between_II profit_NN1 and_CC investment_NN1 levels_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT term_NN1 yue_NNU embraced_VVD all_DB of_IO this_DD1 and_CC more-the_AT performative_JJ context_NN1 and_CC social_JJ meanings_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR included_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS perfumes_NN2 are_VBR made_VVN up_RP of_IO substances_NN2 possessing_VVG differing_JJ volatilities_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 not_XX only_RR have_VH0 an_AT1 olfactory_JJ structure_NN1 ,_, but_CCB also_RR a_AT1 temporal_JJ sequence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS it_PPH1 comes_VVZ to_II emphasizing_VVG the_AT component_NN1 of_IO stewardship_NN1 that_CST deals_VVZ with_IW how_RRQ one_PN1 should_VM exercise_VVI their_APPGE responsibility_NN1 ,_, most_DAT respondents_NN2 offered_VVD concrete_JJ examples_NN2 of_IO recycling_NN1 and_CC "_" not_XX littering_VVG ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 related_JJ feature_NN1 of_IO skill_NN1 stories_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 Cook_NP1 Ding_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 is_VBZ the_AT embodied_VVN nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT activity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT particular_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO rational_JJ support_NN1 that_CST the_AT epistemological_JJ disjunctivist_NN1 claims_VVZ that_CST our_APPGE beliefs_NN2 enjoy_VV0 in_II paradigm_NN1 cases_NN2 of_IO perceptual_JJ knowledge_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST provided_VVD by_II visual_JJ perceptual_JJ states_NN2 of_IO the_AT form_NN1 seeing_CS x_ZZ1 (_( or_CC seeing_VVG an_AT1 F_ZZ1 thing_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN this_DD1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI better_JJR to_TO translate_VVI Ruhrung_VVN as_CSA '_NULL being_VBG stirred_VVN ,_, '_NULL as_CSA I_PPIS1 shall_VM do_VDI in_II this_DD1 article_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II citing_VVG her_APPGE rights_NN2 of_IO ownership_NN1 ,_, she_PPHS1 does_VDZ not_XX justify_VVI her_APPGE refusal_NN1 to_TO allow_VVI me_PPIO1 to_TO plant_VVI zucchini_NN in_II her_APPGE yard_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RRQV it_PPH1 must_VM be_VBI possible_JJ to_TO model_VVI an_AT1 agent_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ uncertain_JJ of_IO whether_CSW he_PPHS1 is_VBZ aware_JJ of_IO everything_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT next_MD section_NN1 (_( §4_FO )_) ,_, I_PPIS1 present_VV0 an_AT1 immanent_JJ reconstruction_NN1 of_IO the_AT GRP_NP1 problematic_JJ -_- '_NULL immanent_JJ '_NULL in_II the_AT sense_NN1 that_CST I_PPIS1 base_VV0 myself_PPX1 on_II Marx_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 text_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT one_MC1 hand_NN1 ,_, number_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ an_AT1 attribute_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ an_AT1 idea_NN1 '_NULL considered_VVN simply_RR in_II the_AT abstract_JJ '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 does_VDZ ,_, however_RR ,_, indicate_VVI how_RRQ the_AT argument_NN1 as_CSA used_VVN for_IF decision_NN1 theories_NN2 based_VVN on_II classical_JJ logic_NN1 can_VM be_VBI adapted_VVN to_II theories_NN2 based_VVN on_II any_DD logic_NN1 that_CST can_VM be_VBI employed_VVN as_II the_AT background_NN1 system_NN1 in_II this_DD1 theory_NN1 ,_, provided_CS21 that_CS22 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 an_AT1 interpretation_NN1 of_IO the_AT model_NN1 theory_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 logic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Trotsky_NP1 further_RRR reckoned_VVD that_CST a_AT1 bourgeois_JJ counter-revolutionary_JJ government_NN1 in_II Russia_NP1 '_NULL for_IF a_AT1 lengthy_JJ period_NN1 would_VM have_VHI to_TO base_VVI itself_PPX1 upon_II the_AT nationalised_JJ economy_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Notationally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 may_VM write_VVI d_ZZ1 x_ZZ1 for_IF d_ZZ1 (_( x_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 month_NNT1 later_RRR ,_, in_II January_NPM1 1921_MC ,_, the_AT kpd_NNU as_II a_AT1 whole_NN1 published_VVD a_AT1 more_RGR comprehensive_JJ appeal_NN1 for_IF united_JJ action_NN1 to_II all_DB workers_NN2 '_NULL organisations_NN2 ,_, including_II the_AT Social_JJ Democrats_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bakhtin_NN1 takes_VVZ the_AT classical_JJ and_CC Romantic_JJ theories_NN2 of_IO genre_NN1 and_CC refracts_VVZ them_PPHO2 through_II the_AT lens_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 modified_JJ semantic_JJ holism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT provision_NN1 of_IO mutual_JJ aid_NN1 is_VBZ particularly_RR important_JJ for_IF those_DD2 immigrants_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR separated_VVN from_II their_APPGE loved_JJ ones_NN2 ,_, struggle_VV0 to_TO communicate_VVI in_II a_AT1 new_JJ language_NN1 ,_, or_CC experience_NN1 alienation_NN1 and_CC discrimination_NN1 after_II arrival_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_DAT of_IO its_APPGE residents_NN2 are_VBR Jews_NN2 who_PNQS emigrated_VVD from_II Tunisia_NP1 ,_, the_AT majority_NN1 from_II Djerba_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT foregoing_JJ points_NN2 to_II a_AT1 basic_JJ element_NN1 within_II contemporary_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO governance_NN1 ,_, i.e._REX instrumental_JJ rationality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Truth_NN1 and_CC Method_NN1 ,_, Gadamer_NP1 asserts_VVZ that_CST prior_II21 to_II22 beginning_VVG the_AT process_NN1 of_IO understanding_VVG a_AT1 text_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 make_VV0 certain_JJ assumptions_NN2 about_II the_AT text_NN1 being_VBG a_AT1 unity_NN1 modeled_VVN on_II a_AT1 one-on-one_MC conversation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II any_DD case_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX seem_VVI to_II me_PPIO1 Eurocentric_JJ to_TO point_VVI out_RP the_AT obstacles_NN2 which_DDQ peripheries_NN2 face_VV0 in_II the_AT world_NN1 system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Study_NN1 2_MC ,_, we_PPIS2 recruited_VVD 910_MC workers_NN2 (_( average_JJ age_NN1 ?_? =_FO ?_? 37_MC ,_, 46%_NNU female_NN1 ,_, 81%_NNU Caucasian_NN1 )_) from_II Amazon_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Mechanical_JJ Turk_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Systematic_JJ :_: the_AT proposal_NN1 would_VM make_VVI the_AT foundation_NN1 coherent_JJ and_CC general_NN1 ,_, but_CCB explanatorily_RR inadequate_JJ ,_, as_CSA it_PPH1 fails_VVZ to_II ground_NN1 a_AT1 general_JJ fact_NN1 about_II the_AT empirical_JJ behavior_NN1 of_IO continuous_JJ matter_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ does_VDZ exert_VVI actual_JJ nonzero_NN1 shear_VV0 forces_NN2 (_( except_CS in_II inviscid_JJ fluids_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yi_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 formulation_NN1 ,_, "_" Reverence_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT method_NN1 of_IO always_RR being_VBG solemn_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST we_PPIS2 use_VV0 both_RR elimination_NN1 rules_NN2 of_IO conjunction_NN1 ;_; tonkish_JJ examples_NN2 arise_VV0 when_RRQ we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX require_VVI using_VVG all_DB the_AT E-principles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_VV0 1_MC1 illustrates_VVZ that_CST ,_, over_II the_AT course_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE engineering_NN1 education_NN1 ,_, students_NN2 '_NULL beliefs_NN2 in_II the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO professional_JJ and_CC ethical_JJ responsibilities_NN2 ,_, understanding_VVG the_AT consequences_NN2 of_IO technology_NN1 ,_, understanding_VVG how_RRQ people_NN use_VV0 machines_NN2 ,_, and_CC social_JJ consciousness_NN1 all_DB decline_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB you_PPY '_NULL ve_VV0 been_VBN visiting_VVG museums_NN2 all_DB week_NNT1 ,_, and_CC you_PPY sat_VVD through_II G_ZZ1 ?_? tterd_NN1 ?_? mmerung_VVD last_MD night_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Critiques_NN2 of_IO secularism_NN1 as_II a_AT1 political_JJ philosophy_NN1 ,_, and_CC of_IO the_AT nation_NN1 understood_VVN as_II a_AT1 secular_JJ entity_NN1 ,_, have_VH0 manifested_VVN themselves_PPX2 as_CSA outright_JJ rejections_NN2 of_IO secularism_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST India_NP1 is_VBZ a_AT1 Hindu_JJ nation_NN1 ,_, or_CC in_II arguments_NN2 that_CST the_AT particular_JJ form_NN1 that_CST secularism_NN1 has_VHZ taken_VVN in_II India_NP1 in_II fact_NN1 compromises_NN2 and_CC undermines_VVZ representative_JJ democracy_NN1 itself_PPX1 owing_VVG the_AT state_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 habit_NN1 of_IO making_VVG compromises_NN2 with_IW (_( or_CC '_NULL pandering_VVG to_II '_NULL ,_, as_CSA popular_JJ terminology_NN1 has_VHZ it_PPH1 )_) minorities_NNU (_( Muslims_NN2 in_RR21 particular_RR22 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II October_NPM1 1979_MC Arico_NP1 launched_VVD ,_, with_IW Jorge_NP1 Tula_NP1 and_CC Portantiero_NP1 ,_, the_AT left-Peronist_JJ magazine_NN1 Controversia_NP1 para_NN1 el_NN1 examen_NN2 de_FW la_FW realidad_NN1 argentina_NN1 ,_, characterised_VVN by_II a_AT1 whole-sale_JJ embrace_NN1 of_IO bourgeois_JJ parliamentary_JJ democracy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, the_AT definition_NN1 of_IO "_" observation_NN1 concept_NN1 "_" will_VM be_VBI relative_II21 to_II22 the_AT sensorial_JJ capacities_NN2 of_IO humans_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Likewise_RR ,_, the_AT Confucian_JJ emphasis_NN1 on_II self-cultivation_NN1 should_VM also_RR be_VBI understood_VVN upon_II the_AT background_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR more_RGR naturally_RR inclined_JJ to_TO demand_VVI it_PPH1 of_IO others_NN2 than_CSN reflecting_VVG inward_JJ and_CC transforming_VVG ourselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recorded_VVN sobbing_VVG in_II a_AT1 sad_JJ film-a_NN1 thought_NN1 experiment_NN1 difficult_JJ to_TO contemplate_VVI without_IW smiling-would_VM hamper_VVI ,_, rather_CS21 than_CS22 boost_VVI ,_, the_AT intended_JJ effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, researchers_NN2 have_VH0 argued_VVN that_CST through_II role-modelling_JJ ethical_JJ behaviors_NN2 to_II their_APPGE subordinates_NN2 ,_, ethical_JJ leaders_NN2 foster_VV0 ethical_JJ behavior_NN1 ,_, reduce_VV0 unethical_JJ behavior_NN1 ,_, and_CC enhance_VV0 positive_JJ workplace_NN1 attitudes_NN2 through_II enhancing_VVG ethical_JJ climates_NN2 in_II their_APPGE organizations_NN2 (_( Demirtas_NP2 &;_NULL Akdogan_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Lu_NP1 &;_NULL Lin_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Mayer_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Shin_NN1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Shin_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Killing_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT last_MD resort_NN1 when_CS there_EX are_VBR no_AT other_JJ options_NN2 available_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 will_VM be_VBI necessary_JJ when_CS examining_VVG his_APPGE work_NN1 below_RL to_TO bear_VVI that_DD1 in_II mind_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Regarding_II the_AT logical_JJ cohesiveness_NN1 (_( LC_NP1 )_) of_IO a_AT1 proof_NN1 P_ZZ1 ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ natural_JJ to_TO capture_VVI it_PPH1 formally_RR simply_RR as_CSA the_AT number_NN1 of_IO lines_NN2 in_II P_ZZ1 that_CST are_VBR justified_VVN through_II an_AT1 appeal_NN1 to_II earlier_JJR lines_NN2 ,_, divided_VVN by_II the_AT overall_JJ number_NN1 of_IO lines_NN2 in_II the_AT proof_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Without_IW action_NN1 the_AT knowledge_NN1 remains_VVZ in_II process_NN1 and_CC might_VM be_VBI interrupted_VVN and_CC fail_VV0 to_TO form_VVI ;_; and_CC if_CS action_NN1 turns_VVZ out_RP badly_RR ,_, then_RT it_PPH1 never_RR was_VBDZ knowledge_NN1 at_RR21 all_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II one_MC1 sense_NN1 ,_, Trump_NN1 has_VHZ made_VVN a_AT1 tremendous_JJ financial_JJ effort_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS Chump_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 effort_NN1 ,_, while_CS sizeable_JJ ,_, is_VBZ nowhere_RL near_RL Trump_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Phenotypic_JJ plasticity_NN1 may_VM be_VBI either_RR intra-generational_JJ or_CC inter-generational_JJ ,_, with_IW parents_NN2 producing_VVG different_JJ offspring_NN on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE '_NULL experience_NN1 '_NULL of_IO the_AT environment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 already_RR rejected_VVD Morgan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 adoption_NN1 of_IO the_AT Punalua_NP1 marriage_NN1 as_CSA far_JJ back_NN1 as_CSA 1882_MC and_CC I_PPIS1 think_VV0 that_CST I_PPIS1 am_VBM the_AT first_MD to_TO have_VHI understood_VVN the_AT kinship_NN1 terms_NN2 on_II which_DDQ Morgan_NP1 based_VVD himself_PPX1 as_CSA designations_NN2 of_IO generation_NN1 levels_NN2 ,_, not_XX degrees_NN2 of_IO descent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT following_JJ subsection_NN1 I_PPIS1 will_VM attempt_VVI to_TO identify_VVI what_DDQ this_DD1 is_VBZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT uncritical_JJ and_CC vulgar_JJ results_NN2 have_VH0 had_VHN boring_JJ and_CC often_RR dangerous_JJ consequences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Jung_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Western_JJ ideas_NN2 of_IO animus_NN1 and_CC anima_NN1 are_VBR shaped_VVN by_II Wilhelm_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Eastern_JJ interventions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Persons_NN2 who_PNQS act_VV0 with_IW artistic_JJ integrity_NN1 ,_, by_II contrast_NN1 ,_, not_XX only_RR give_VV0 their_APPGE best_JJT to_II their_APPGE art_NN1 ,_, but_CCB at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 give_VV0 their_APPGE best_JJT to_II their_APPGE audience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 should_VM only_RR draw_VVI this_DD1 conclusion_NN1 if_CS Ranger_NP1 Rick_NP1 learns_VVZ something_PN1 morally_RR relevant_JJ between_II (_( 1_MC1 )_) and_CC (_( 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 when_CS22 we_PPIS2 are_VBR sure_JJ that_CST destruction_NN1 is_VBZ occurring_VVG ,_, intervention_NN1 may_VM still_RR not_XX be_VBI acceptable_JJ ,_, all_DB things_NN2 considered_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Kant_NP1 ,_, equality_NN1 (_( as_CSA non-dependence_JJ )_) is_VBZ a_AT1 prerequisite_NN1 for_IF free_JJ and_CC autonomous_JJ choice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX land_NN1 that_CST individuals_NN2 or_CC peoples_NN2 or_CC nations_NN2 '_NULL own_VV0 '_NULL in_II the_AT liberal_JJ sense_NN1 ,_, but_CCB land_NN1 of_IO which_DDQ one_PN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 fundamental_JJ part_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 may_VM appear_VVI to_TO be_VBI light_JJ blue_JJ ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, against_II a_AT1 darker_JJR blue_NN1 projected_VVN onto_II the_AT ceiling_NN1 ,_, and_CC then_RT shift_VV0 to_II a_AT1 much_RR deeper_JJR shade_NN1 when_CS the_AT interior_JJ color_NN1 modulates_VVZ to_II pale_JJ peach_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moderate_JJ actual_JJ intentionalism_NN1 "_" acknowledges_VVZ that_CST the_AT author_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 intention_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX sufficient_JJ to_TO imbue_VVI the_AT work_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 meaning_NN1 it_PPH1 can_VM not_XX conventionally_RR support_VVI ,_, but_CCB at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 preserves_VVZ the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST the_AT author_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 work_NN1 does_VDZ have_VHI a_AT1 degree_NN1 of_IO special_JJ authority_NN1 with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 its_APPGE meaning_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
As_II the_AT first_MD principle_NN1 of_IO unity_NN1 or_CC primary_JJ cause_NN1 ,_, God_NP1 is_VBZ the_AT "_" the_AT ruler_NN1 and_CC parent_NN1 of_IO all_RR "_" (_( 399a30_FO )_) that_CST begets_VVZ all_DB beings_NN2 in_II the_AT universe_NN1 ,_, each_DD1 according_II21 to_II22 its_APPGE own_DA kind_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 sense_NN1 ,_, Zuni_JJ Indians_NN2 can_VM learn_VVI the_AT concept_NN1 "_" orange_NN1 "_" ,_, which_DDQ they_PPHS2 did_VDD not_XX have_VHI ,_, after_CS a_AT1 short_JJ period_NN1 of_IO training_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ part_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ I_PPIS1 understand_VV0 Coulthard_NP1 to_TO be_VBI saying_VVG when_RRQ he_PPHS1 writes_VVZ ,_, &lsqb;_( T_ZZ1 &rsqb;_) he_PPHS1 land-claims_NN2 process_VV0 itself_PPX1 has_VHZ also_RR served_VVN to_TO subtly_RR shape_VVI how_RGQ Indigenous_JJ peoples_NN2 now_RT think_VV0 and_CC act_VV0 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 the_AT land_NN1 ..._... 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 aren_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 people_NN but_CCB those_DD2 worshipping_VVG them_PPHO2 display_VV0 attitudes_NN2 towards_II these_DD2 non-personal_JJ objects_NN2 akin_JJ to_II the_AT attitudes_NN2 displayed_VVN towards_II actual_JJ persons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS not_XX explicit_JJ in_II his_APPGE work_NN1 ,_, the_AT idea_NN1 is_VBZ naturally_RR at_II home_NN1 in_II his_APPGE physical_JJ monadology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
New_JJ Qing_JJ History_NN1 believes_VVZ that_CST the_AT Qing_NP1 often_RR incorporated_VVN other_JJ nationalities_NN2 under_II central_JJ authority_NN1 as_CSA ethnic_JJ groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 algebra_NN1 A_ZZ1 =_FO A_ZZ1 ,_, f1_FO ,_, ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. Anticognitivists_NP1 often_RR imply_VV0 that_CST in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO be_VBI cognitively_RR valuable_JJ ,_, learning_VVG from_II literature_NN1 should_VM be_VBI equal_JJ to_II that_DD1 of_IO learning_VVG scientific_JJ facts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Arguably_RR ,_, this_DD1 problem_NN1 arises_VVZ because_CS Gaut_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 theory_NN1 takes_VVZ on_RP too_RG broad_JJ a_AT1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Abaelard_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 solution_NN1 to_II the_AT puzzle_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO note_VVI that_CST Aristotle_NP1 does_VDZ not_XX explicitly_RR claim_VVI that_CST the_AT denominated_JJ items_NN2 are_VBR situs_JJ ,_, or_CC positiones_NN2 ,_, but_CCB rather_RG simply_RR that_DD1 iacere_NN1 ,_, stare_VV0 ,_, etc._RA are_VBR denominated_VVN from_II species_NN of_IO positio_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Surplus_JJ fictitious_JJ capital_NN1 created_VVN within_II the_AT banking_NN1 system_NN1 was_VBDZ absorbing_VVG the_AT surplus_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II tranquility_NN1 they_PPHS2 do_VD0 not_XX try_VVI to_TO govern_VVI ,_, but_CCB nothing_PN1 is_VBZ left_JJ ungoverned_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 had_VHD unique_JJ street_NN1 cred_VVD with_IW younger_JJR rappers_NN2 and_CC fans_NN2 who_PNQS saw_VVD him_PPHO1 as_CSA embodying_VVG Hip_NN1 Hop_NN1 authenticity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Erotetic_JJ inferences_NN2 of_IO the_AT second_MD kind_NN1 ,_, where_CS a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO premises_NN2 consists_VVZ of_IO a_AT1 question_NN1 and_CC possibly_RR some_DD declarative_JJ sentence(s)_NN2 and_CC an_AT1 agent_NN1 passes_VVZ from_II it_PPH1 to_II another_DD1 question_NN1 ?_? grasped_VVD under_II the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO erotetic_JJ implication_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT fact_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 non-local_JJ relationship_NN1 holds_VVZ between_II events_NN2 can_VM be_VBI relevant_JJ for_IF what_DDQ their_APPGE chances_NN2 are_VBR ,_, and_CC thus_RR chances_NN2 are_VBR not_XX local_JJ to_II each_DD1 of_IO them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 study_NN1 will_VM introduce_VVI three_MC such_DA communities_NN2 in_II Israel_NP1 and_CC describe_VV0 the_AT circumstances_NN2 surrounding_VVG their_APPGE establishment_NN1 and_CC operating_VVG methods_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Vania_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 57-year-old_JJ immigrant_NN1 from_II the_AT northeastern_JJ region_NN1 of_IO Brazil_NP1 where_RRQ she_PPHS1 had_VHD worked_VVN as_II a_AT1 bank_NN1 teller_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ enough_DD to_TO take_VVI a_AT1 look_NN1 at_II Figure_NN1 9_MC to_TO see_VVI that_CST this_DD1 commentary_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX at_RR21 all_RR22 correspond_VV0 to_II the_AT history_NN1 of_IO French_JJ capitalism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ called_VVN '_NULL symmetry_NN1 trading_NN1 '_NULL and_CC has_VHZ been_VBN used_VVN to_TO construct_VVI the_AT shape_NN1 dynamics_NN formalism_NN1 introduced_VVN in_II (_( Gomes_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
&lsqb;_( 2011_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR note_VV0 that_CST ,_, since_RR ?_? and_CC are_VBR closed_VVN ,_, they_PPHS2 can_VM not_XX interfere_VVI with_IW the_AT application_NN1 of_IO rule_NN1 (_( 6_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
?_? Appealing_VVG to_II ignorance_NN1 will_VM similarly_RR "_" force_VV0 "_" disputants_NN2 "_" to_TO submit_VVI their_APPGE judgments_NN2 ,_, and_CC receive_VVI the_AT opinion_NN1 in_II debate_NN1 "_" (_( WJL_NP1 2.260_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR our_APPGE theory_NN1 must_VM provide_VVI a_AT1 means_NN for_IF verifying_VVG whether_CSW a_AT1 winning_JJ condition_NN1 that_CST applies_VVZ to_II infinite_JJ strings_NN2 holds_VVZ or_CC not_XX in_II virtue_NN1 of_IO finite_JJ prefixes_NN2 of_IO those_DD2 strings_NN2 when_RRQ possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, Walsh_NP1 alleges_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 single_JJ system_NN1 he_PPHS1 puts_VVZ forward_RL can_VM be_VBI treated_VVN either_RR as_II a_AT1 single_JJ macro-population_NN1 or_CC as_II a_AT1 composite_NN1 of_IO many_DA2 sub-populations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Though_CS I_PPIS1 recognized_VVD the_AT poignancy_NN1 and_CC power_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ had_VHD just_RR happened_VVN ,_, I_PPIS1 could_VM not_XX finish_VVI the_AT song_NN1 with_IW them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, social/environment_FU included_VVN elements_NN2 like_II family_NN1 structure_NN1 ,_, social_JJ inequality_NN1 ,_, or_CC policy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 gain_VV0 occasional_JJ insights_NN2 into_II contemporary_JJ subjectivity_NN1 ,_, but_CCB are_VBR unable_JK to_TO pin-point_VVI the_AT cause_NN1 of_IO the_AT crises_NN2 that_CST they_PPHS2 identify_VV0 and_CC bewail_VV0 ;_; the_AT crisis_NN1 being_VBG the_AT distortions_NN2 of_IO the_AT self_NN1 and_CC modes_NN2 of_IO life_NN1 and_CC self-reproduction_NN1 that_CST the_AT current_JJ world_NN1 market_NN1 exerts_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO "_" Feiming_NP1 ,_, "_" we_PPIS2 know_VV0 that_CST for_IF the_AT authors_NN2 Tang_NN1 and_CC Wu_NP1 were_VBDR not_XX the_AT first_MD to_TO use_VVI the_AT term_NN1 ming_VVG -Jie_JJ and_CC Zhou_NP1 had_VHD used_VVN them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 us_PPIO2 say_VVI that_CST two_MC objects_NN2 ,_, x_ZZ1 and_CC y_ZZ1 ,_, are_VBR spacelike-separated_JJ just_RR in_CS21 case_CS22 they_PPHS2 exactly_RR occupy_VV0 spacelike_JJ separated_JJ regions_NN2 of_IO spacetime_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bayne_NP1 and_CC Hohwy_NP1 (_( &lsqb;_( forthcoming_JJ &rsqb;_) )_) similarly_RR consider_VV0 a_AT1 whole_JJ range_NN1 of_IO possible_JJ aspects_NN2 that_CST might_VM be_VBI impaired_VVN in_II disorders_NN2 of_IO consciousness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD argument_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 distinctive_JJ political_JJ normativity_NN1 reflects_VVZ ,_, in_RR21 part_RR22 ,_, a_AT1 broader_JJR realist_NN1 concern_NN1 with_IW the_AT ubiquity_NN1 and_CC depth_NN1 of_IO moral_JJ disagreement_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT activity_NN1 is_VBZ feasible_JJ as_II a_AT1 way_NN1 of_IO achieving_VVG the_AT end_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perhaps_RR Alspector-Kelly_NP1 will_VM agree_VVI with_IW this_DD1 ,_, but_CCB then_RT go_VV0 on_RP to_TO insist_VVI that_CST talk_NN1 of_IO postulation_NN1 makes_VVZ as_RG much_DA1 or_CC as_CSA little_DA1 sense_NN1 in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO microscopes_NN2 as_CSA it_PPH1 does_VDZ in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO the_AT perception_NN1 of_IO the_AT tree_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB I_PPIS1 am_VBM standing_VVG right_RR by_II the_AT window_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT kind_NN1 of_IO responsibilities_NN2 Christians_NN2 have_VH0 to_TO care_VVI for_IF the_AT earth_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, the_AT longer_JJR the_AT streak_NN1 went_VVD on_RP ,_, the_AT luckier_JJR he_PPHS1 was_VBDZ to_TO keep_VVI it_PPH1 up_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 are_VBR privileged_JJ and_CC grateful_JJ for_IF the_AT serious_JJ ,_, critical_JJ and_CC productive_JJ engagements_NN2 offered_VVN by_II each_DD1 of_IO the_AT authors_NN2 in_II this_DD1 symposium_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT book_NN1 falls_VVZ into_II four_MC sections_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 began_VVD studying_VVG the_AT parish_NN1 ,_, here_RL named_VVD "_" St._NP1 Maximilian_NP1 ,_, "_" approximately_RR 6_MC years_NNT2 after_II the_AT merger_NN1 ,_, during_II the_AT latter_DA half_NN1 of_IO 2008_MC and_CC the_AT first_MD half_NN1 of_IO 2009_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR truckloads_NN2 of_IO very_RG important_JJ cases_NN2 where_RRQ PA_NN1 can_VM prove_VVI that_CST each_DD1 number_NN1 blurgs_VVZ without_IW being_VBG able_JK to_TO prove_VVI that_CST every_AT1 number_NN1 blurgs_NN2 ,_, not_XX least_RRT of_IO which_DDQ is_VBZ when_RRQ "_" x_ZZ1 blurgs_VVZ "_" means_NN :_: x_ZZ1 does_VDZ not_XX code_VVI a_AT1 proof_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 contradiction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II the_AT selection_NN1 of_IO the_AT five_MC examples_NN2 above_RL ,_, I_PPIS1 have_VH0 wished_VVN to_TO point_VVI to_II some_DD recurring_JJ themes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Stocks_NN2 ,_, shares_NN2 ,_, bonds_NN2 ,_, securities_NN2 and_CC financial_JJ derivatives_NN2 are_VBR all_DB examples_NN2 of_IO fictitious_JJ capital_NN1 ,_, the_AT formation_NN1 of_IO which_DDQ is_VBZ referred_VVN to_II by_II Marx_NP1 ,_, as_CSA it_PPH1 is_VBZ today_RT ,_, as_CSA capitalisation_NN1 Fictitious_JJ capital_NN1 can_VM also_RR be_VBI captured_VVN by_II what_DDQ we_PPIS2 today_RT call_VV0 securitisation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sonorous_NP1 ,_, auto-tuned_VVD chanting_VVG and_CC cacophonous_JJ gunfire_NN1 reverberate_NN1 on_II the_AT soundtrack_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT earlier_JJR textual_JJ study_NN1 should_VM be_VBI assessed_VVN by_II the_AT criteria_NN2 of_IO excellence_NN1 that_CST characterize_VV0 the_AT philological_JJ community_NN1 ,_, while_CS the_AT later_JJR construction_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 more_RGR reflective_JJ and_CC systematic_JJ account_NN1 should_VM be_VBI assessed_VVN by_II those_DD2 that_CST characterize_VV0 the_AT philosophical_JJ community_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, my_APPGE reasons_NN2 for_IF employing_VVG the_AT bipartite_JJ distinction_NN1 and_CC the_AT labels_NN2 doing_VDG and_CC going_VVG are_VBR not_XX spurious_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Landman_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1992_MC )_) theory_NN1 ,_, Dowty_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1979_MC )_) idea_NN1 of_IO the_AT progressive_JJ depending_II21 on_II22 some_DD kind_NN1 of_IO inertia_NN1 survives_VVZ in_II a_AT1 modified_JJ form_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS not_XX as_RG solidly_RR left_VVN of_IO center_NN1 as_CSA Blacks_NN2 ,_, Hispanics_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO be_VBI more_RGR left_JJ of_IO center_NN1 than_CSN Whites_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Surely_RR models_NN2 must_VM bear_VVI some_DD relationship_NN1 to_II how_RRQ things_NN2 are_VBR in_II the_AT real_JJ world_NN1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO be_VBI explanatory_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS S_ZZ1 knows_VVZ that_CST p_ZZ1 ,_, and_CC T_ZZ1 knows_VVZ that_CST S_ZZ1 is_VBZ trustworthy_JJ and_CC S_ZZ1 tells_VVZ T_ZZ1 that_CST p_ZZ1 ,_, T_ZZ1 can_VM come_VVI to_TO know_VVI that_CST p_ZZ1 too_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT neurological_JJ bases_NN2 of_IO these_DD2 proclivities_NN2 may_VM include_VVI the_AT release_NN1 of_IO oxytocin_NN1 and_CC vasopressin_NN1 ,_, as_CSA mentioned_VVN earlier_RRR ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, (_( )_) is_VBZ a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO -substitutions_NN2 in_II each_DD1 member_NN1 of_IO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO statements_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 say_VV0 that_DD1 is_VBZ closed_VVN under_II substitutions_NN2 (_( under_II Sb_NP1 ,_, for_IF short_JJ )_) ,_, if_CS (_( )_) ?_? 
</s>
<s>
He/she_PPHS1 thought_VVD this_DD1 to_TO be_VBI undesirable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 was_VBDZ succeeded_VVN by_II his_APPGE son_NN1 Jeconiah_NP1 ,_, and_CC the_AT Babylonian_JJ king_NN1 Nebuchadnezzar_NN1 besieged_VVD Jerusalem_NP1 and_CC national_JJ disaster_NN1 was_VBDZ imminent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, suppose_VV0 we_PPIS2 considered_VVD a_AT1 regular_JJ polyhedron_NN1 composed_VVN of_IO hexagons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Though_CS ,_, from_II our_APPGE current_JJ vantage-point_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 tend_VV0 to_TO perceive_VVI the_AT contemporary_JJ emphasis_NN1 on_II identity_NN1 as_II a_AT1 simple_JJ increase_NN1 in_II the_AT use_NN1 of_IO the_AT term_NN1 '_NULL identity_NN1 '_NULL ,_, corresponding_VVG to_II certain_JJ '_NULL real_JJ life_NN1 '_NULL changes_NN2 ,_, what_DDQ is_VBZ in_II fact_NN1 at_II stake_NN1 in_II our_APPGE notions_NN2 of_IO personal_JJ and_CC social_JJ identity_NN1 are_VBR substantively_RR new_JJ uses_NN2 of_IO the_AT term_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Whatever_DDQV their_APPGE differences_NN2 with_IW each_PPX221 other_PPX222 ,_, Krausz_NP1 and_CC Shandro_NP1 fully_RR agree_VV0 with_IW Negri_JJ that_CST revolutionary_JJ activists_NN2 must_VM seriously_RR engage_VVI with_IW Lenin_NP1 if_CS they_PPHS2 hope_VV0 to_TO move_VVI forward_RL in_II replacing_VVG destructive_JJ capitalist_JJ tyranny_NN1 with_IW life-affirming_JJ socialist_JJ democracy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT study_NN1 found_VVD a_AT1 52_MC %_NNU concordance_NN1 for_IF homosexuality_NN1 in_II MZ_NP1 twins_NN2 compared_VVN to_II 22_MC %_NNU for_IF DZ_NP1 twins_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
True_JJ ,_, there_EX are_VBR no_RR21 doubt_RR22 many_DA2 cobblers_NN2 who_PNQS ,_, to_TO make_VVI more_DAR money_NN1 ,_, quit_VVD practicing_VVG their_APPGE craft_NN1 and_CC instead_RR began_VVD mass_NN1 producing_VVG inferior_JJ quality_NN1 shoes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 aesthetic_JJ experience_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 experience_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 object_NN1 as_CSA having_VHG the_AT aesthetic_JJ features_NN2 that_CST it_PPH1 has_VHZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_II returning_VVG to_II Cairo_NP1 '_NULL Abd_NP1 al-Halim_NP1 waited_VVD for_IF weeks_NNT2 and_CC months_NNT2 for_IF the_AT date_NN1 of_IO hajj_JJ to_TO approach_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Early_JJ studies_NN2 focused_VVN on_II identifying_VVG the_AT composition_NN1 of_IO alloys_NN2 ,_, but_CCB by_II the_AT mid-nineteenth_MD century_NNT1 attention_NN1 had_VHD turned_VVN to_II questions_NN2 about_II the_AT geographical_JJ sources_NN2 of_IO the_AT metals_NN2 that_CST made_VVD up_RP these_DD2 artifacts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 refer_VV0 to_II this_DD1 argument_NN1 as_II the_AT bilateralism_NN1 thesis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO highlight_VVI extra-textual_JJ factors_NN2 in_II religious_JJ debates_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX to_TO minimise_VVI the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO the_AT Qur_NN1 '_NULL an_AT1 or_CC other_JJ Islamic_JJ texts_NN2 for_IF any_DD of_IO the_AT concerned_JJ parties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE choice_NN1 of_IO terms_NN2 here_RL is_VBZ somewhat_RR arbitrary_JJ ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO keep_VVI three_MC closely_RR related_JJ notions_NN2 distinct_JJ :_: (_( i_ZZ1 )_) the_AT wholly_RR objective_JJ frequency_NN1 of_IO the_AT sound_NN1 event_NN1 (_( '_NULL frequency_NN1 '_NULL )_) ,_, (_( ii_MC )_) our_APPGE experience_NN1 of_IO the_AT frequency_NN1 of_IO sounds_NN2 (_( '_NULL frequency_NN1 as_CSA heard_VVN '_NULL )_) ,_, and_CC (_( iii_MC )_) our_APPGE experience_NN1 of_IO the_AT musical_JJ feature_NN1 of_IO sounds_NN2 most_RGT closely_RR correlated_VVN with_IW frequency_NN1 (_( '_NULL pitch_NN1 '_NULL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Certain_JJ kinds_NN2 of_IO evidentialists_NN2 will_VM think_VVI that_CST all_DB there_EX is_VBZ to_II epistemic_JJ normativity_NN1 is_VBZ evidential_JJ normativity_NN1 ,_, but_CCB I_PPIS1 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 mean_VV0 to_TO be_VBI making_VVG that_DD1 assumption_NN1 here_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 fuller_JJR recognition_NN1 version_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 fair_JJ equality_NN1 of_IO opportunity_NN1 princi_NN2 ?_? ple_NN1 adds_VVZ a_AT1 dimension_NN1 of_IO meaning_VVG to_II Rawls_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 notion_NN1 of_IO society_NN1 as_II a_AT1 "_" social_JJ union_NN1 "_" and_CC can_VM be_VBI viewed_VVN as_II an_AT1 aspect_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE "_" social_JJ bases_NN2 "_" of_IO self-respect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, none_PN of_IO the_AT major_JJ reports_NN2 discussed_VVD how_RGQ Fascist_JJ attacks_NN2 could_VM be_VBI countered_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 begin_VV0 with_IW some_DD terminological_JJ preliminaries_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ representation_NN1 of_IO culture_NN1 for_IF others_NN2 also_RR provides_VVZ a_AT1 way_NN1 to_TO sustain_VVI that_DD1 culture_NN1 into_II the_AT future_NN1 ,_, and_CC yet_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ here_RL that_CST the_AT complex_JJ set_NN1 of_IO constructs_NN2 is_VBZ most_RGT keenly_RR felt_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ independent_JJ of_IO whether_CSW we_PPIS2 are_VBR in_II fact_NN1 expected_VVD to_TO fulfil_VVI the_AT commitment_NN1 ,_, i.e._REX whether_CSW we_PPIS2 are_VBR trusted_VVN or_CC distrusted_VVD in_II this_DD1 respect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Its_APPGE main_JJ benefit_NN1 accrues_VVZ from_II the_AT fact_NN1 ,_, that_CST '_NULL it_PPH1 protects_VVZ audience_NN1 members_NN2 from_II direct_JJ coercion_NN1 or_CC even_RR influence_VV0 towards_II any_DD particular_JJ version_NN1 of_IO the_AT truth_NN1 '_NULL (_( 61_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 last_MD aspect_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ often_RR goes_VVZ unnoticed_JJ in_II studies_NN2 on_II Bensaid_NP1 ,_, was_VBDZ a_AT1 particularly_RR notable_JJ feature_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE work_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ clashes_VVZ with_IW the_AT endogenous_JJ francocentric_JJ ethos_NN1 that_CST often_RR dominates_VVZ French_JJ intellectual_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 makes_VVZ 8_MC false_JJ and_CC 1o_FO true_JJ as_CSA required_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Confucius_NP1 ,_, program_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 response_NN1 to_II this_DD1 situation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Slight_JJ deviations_NN2 from_II standard_JJ quantum_NN1 mechanical_JJ behavior_NN1 should_VM be_VBI expected_VVN due_II21 to_II22 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST there_EX are_VBR only_RR a_AT1 finite_JJ number_NN1 of_IO worlds_NN2 ;_; worse_JJR deviations_NN2 ,_, the_AT fewer_DAR worlds_NN2 there_EX are_VBR ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II such_DA cases_NN2 ,_, other_JJ principles_NN2 might_VM explain_VVI what_DDQ you_PPY may_VM do_VDI :_: Killing_VVG Murderer_NN1 is_VBZ better_JJR for_IF the_AT rest_NN1 of_IO us_PPIO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
La_NP1 Voie_NP1 occidentale_NN1 (_( translations_NN2 of_IO the_AT mass-strike_JJ debate_NN1 in_II German_JJ Social_JJ Democracy_NN1 )_) captured_VVD the_AT contours_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 divergence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II many_DA2 countries_NN2 a_AT1 combination_NN1 of_IO maternal_JJ age_NN1 ,_, serum_NN1 markers_NN2 (_( PAPP.A_NP1 and_CC betaHCG_NN1 )_) and_CC nuchal_JJ translucency_NN1 (_( NT_NP1 )_) (_( the_AT thickness_NN1 of_IO the_AT fluid_NN1 filled_VVD area_NN1 at_II the_AT back_NN1 of_IO the_AT foetal_JJ neck_NN1 )_) is_VBZ used_VVN to_TO determine_VVI a_AT1 pregnancy_NN1 specific_JJ risk_NN1 on_II Down_NP1 syndrome_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 dynamic_JJ domain_NN1 or_CC transition_NN1 system_NN1 consists_VVZ of_IO a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO states_NN2 and_CC a_AT1 transition_NN1 function_NN1 that_CST maps_NN2 states_VVZ to_II states_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, an_AT1 experience_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 object_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 extended_JJ motion_NN1 might_VM be_VBI built_VVN up_RP out_II21 of_II22 temporally_RR disjoint_JJ experiences_NN2 of_IO parts_NN2 of_IO the_AT motion_NN1 (_( are_VBR these_DD2 parts_NN2 also_RR built_VVN up_RP out_II21 of_II22 shorter_JJR experiential_JJ parts_NN2 ,_, ad_RR21 infinitum_RR22 ?_? -_- a_AT1 good_JJ question_NN1 ,_, to_II which_DDQ we_PPIS2 will_VM return_VVI below_RL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 depends_VVZ on_II how_RRQ we_PPIS2 represent_VV0 this_DD1 event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, insentient_JJ beings_NN2 can_VM be_VBI considered_VVN not_XX only_RR to_TO cultivate_VVI but_CCB also_RR to_TO be_VBI able_JK to_TO actively_RR preach_VVI the_AT Dharma_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB the_AT T-shirts_NN2 produced_VVN or_CC only_RR those_DD2 that_CST were_VBDR sold_VVN ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Abstract_VV0 :_: Jiang_NP1 Qing_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 proposal_NN1 of_IO the_AT kingly_JJ way_NN1 (_( wangdao_NN1 ;_; )_) is_VBZ probably_RR the_AT most_RGT detailed_JJ Chinese_JJ alternative_NN1 to_II both_DB2 the_AT current_JJ PRC_NP1 (_( People_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 Republic_NN1 of_IO China_NP1 )_) regime_NN1 and_CC liberal_JJ democracy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II total_NN1 ,_, four_MC statistically_RR significant_JJ differences_NN2 were_VBDR obtained_VVN for_IF the_AT argument_NN1 from_II ignorance_NN1 passages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, sparing_VVG N_ZZ1 people_NN from_II the_AT latter_DA harm_NN1 generates_VVZ N_ZZ1 times_NNT2 as_RG much_DA1 value_NN1 as_CSA sparing_VVG one_MC1 person_NN1 this_DD1 harm_NN1 ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 ,_, on_II these_DD2 theories_NN2 ,_, for_IF some_DD N_ZZ1 ,_, the_AT moral_JJ value_NN1 of_IO saving_VVG N_ZZ1 well-off_JJ people_NN from_II being_VBG bedridden_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 day_NNT1 will_VM exceed_VVI the_AT moral_JJ value_NN1 of_IO saving_VVG one_MC1 young_JJ person_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Gt_NP1 holds_VVZ that_CST the_AT agent_NN1 should_VM put_VVI aside_RL self-centered_JJ inclinations_NN2 and_CC mold_VVI her_APPGE inner_JJ desires_NN2 in_II31 accordance_II32 with_II33 publicly_RR sanctioned_VVN forms_NN2 of_IO behavior_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, dharma_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD act_NN1 by_II virtue_NN1 of_IO which_DDQ the_AT State_NN1 really_RR constitutes_VVZ itself_PPX1 the_AT representative_NN1 of_IO the_AT whole_NN1 of_IO society-the_AT taking_JJ possession_NN1 of_IO the_AT means_NN of_IO production_NN1 in_II the_AT name_NN1 of_IO society-this_DD1 is_VBZ ,_, at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, its_APPGE last_MD independent_JJ act_NN1 as_II a_AT1 State_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
OICO_NP1 entails_VVZ OICS_NP1 :_: if_CS OICO_NP1 is_VBZ true_JJ ,_, then_RT any_DD agent_NN1 who_PNQS (_( at_II a_AT1 given_JJ time_NNT1 )_) has_VHZ an_AT1 unconditional_JJ obligation_NN1 can_VM obey_VVI the_AT obligation_NN1 ,_, and_CC then_RT OICS_NP1 is_VBZ also_RR true_JJ because_CS the_AT agent_NN1 can_VM satisfy_VVI the_AT obligation_NN1 (_( since_CS ,_, for_IF unconditional_JJ obligations_NN2 ,_, obedience_NN1 amounts_VVZ to_II satisfaction_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 claim_VV0 that_CST general_JJ jurisprudence_NN1 is_VBZ about_II the_AT "_" nature_NN1 "_" of_IO law_NN1 and_CC do_VD0 not_XX explicitly_RR bring_VVI in_RP legal_JJ thought_NN1 and_CC talk_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Does_VDZ any_DD of_IO this_DD1 conflict_NN1 with_IW externalist_JJ semantics_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB now_RT take_VV0 largeness_NN1 itself_PPX1 and_CC the_AT other_JJ things_NN2 which_DDQ are_VBR large_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 of_IO St._NP1 Thomas_NP1 Aquinas_NN2 '_NULL most_RGT influential_JJ positions_NN2 is_VBZ his_APPGE account_NN1 of_IO the_AT human_JJ soul_NN1 as_II a_AT1 subsistent_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT human_JJ being_NN1 and_CC as_II the_AT substantial_JJ form_NN1 of_IO the_AT body_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ because_CS so_RG much_DA1 is_VBZ at_II stake_NN1 for_IF him_PPHO1 and_CC because_CS he_PPHS1 would_VM be_VBI very_RG badly_RR off_RP if_CS he_PPHS1 were_VBDR not_XX aided_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT difference_NN1 between_II confirmation_NN1 and_CC affirmation_NN1 has_VHZ nothing_PN1 to_TO do_VDI with_IW Memento_NN1 and_CC everything_PN1 to_TO do_VDI with_IW the_AT audience_NN1 ,_, and_CC there_EX is_VBZ no_AT reason_NN1 to_TO restrict_VVI the_AT film_NN1 to_II the_AT illustration_NN1 of_IO preexisting_VVG ideas_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, a_AT1 tension_NN1 remains_VVZ about_II how_RRQ to_TO understand_VVI the_AT claims_NN2 that_CST suggest_VV0 that_CST through_II non-action_NN1 ,_, the_AT sage_NN1 can_VM accomplish_VVI everything_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT commodity_NN1 public_NN1 sphere_NN1 transforms_VVZ a_AT1 certain_JJ form_NN1 of_IO thinking_VVG into_II an_AT1 elevated_JJ realm_NN1 at_II some_DD distance_NN1 from_II more_RGR '_NULL earthly_JJ '_NULL labouring_VVG activity._NNU (_( r_ZZ1 )_) 9_MC Descartes_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, is_VBZ justly_RR identified_VVN as_CSA first_MD great_JJ thinker_NN1 who_PNQS sought_VVD to_TO systematically_RR establish_VVI '_NULL the_AT identity_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 "_" I_PPIS1 "_" reduced_VVD to_II pure_JJ thought_NN1 with_IW an_AT1 outer_JJ world_NN1 reduced_VVN to_II pure_JJ reason_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consider_VV0 what_DDQ Lewis_NP1 means_VVZ when_RRQ he_PPHS1 calls_VVZ common_JJ sense_NN1 "_" unsystematic_JJ folk_NN theory_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT existence_NN1 of_IO redness_NN1 might_VM be_VBI grounded_VVN in_II facts_NN2 about_II all_DB the_AT red_JJ things_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD similarity_NN1 between_II CCFs_NP1 and_CC facts_NN2 about_II the_AT laws_NN2 which_DDQ I_PPIS1 wish_VV0 to_TO highlight_VVI holds_NN2 only_RR under_II the_AT assumption_NN1 that_CST the_AT laws_NN2 are_VBR non-Humean_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Orlando_NP1 Patterson_NP1 and_CC others_NN2 have_VH0 shown_VVN ,_, real_JJ masters_NN2 often_RR have_VH0 other_JJ sources_NN2 for_IF recognition_NN1 -_- centrally_RR ,_, one_PPX121 another_PPX122 -_- and_CC as_CSA Fanon_NP1 puts_VVZ it_PPH1 bluntly_RR :_: '_NULL what_DDQ he_PPHS1 wants_VVZ from_II the_AT slave_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX recognition_NN1 but_CCB work_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ distinguishes_VVZ these_DD2 currents_NN2 arises_VVZ not_XX from_II different_JJ definitions_NN2 or_CC justifications_NN2 of_IO knowledge_NN1 but_CCB instead_RR different_JJ ideas_NN2 about_II how_RRQ to_TO acquire_VVI such_DA knowledge_NN1 and_CC especially_RR how_RRQ to_TO train_VVI it_PPH1 for_IF wisdom_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 re-construction_NN1 I_PPIS1 transcend_VV0 the_AT transformation_NN1 as_II a_AT1 concretisation_NN1 of_IO the_AT Capital_NN1 I_ZZ1 concepts_NN2 of_IO value_NN1 and_CC surplus-value_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF all_DB practical_JJ purposes_NN2 ,_, the_AT insert_NN1 became_VVD the_AT de_JJ21 facto_JJ22 voice_NN1 of_IO the_AT left_JJ wing_NN1 until_CS pressure_NN1 from_II Lenin_NP1 led_VVD to_II its_APPGE cancellation_NN1 on_II 1_MC1 January_NPM1 1923_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 abide_VV0 by_II basic_JJ Christian_JJ tenets_NN2 but_CCB share_VV0 a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO characteristics_NN2 that_CST separate_VV0 them_PPHO2 from_II some_DD other_JJ Christian_JJ groups_NN2 ,_, including_II their_APPGE values_NN2 regarding_II discipleship_NN1 ,_, obedience_NN1 ,_, and_CC Gelassenheit_NP1 (_( yieldedness_NN1 )_) to_II God_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 will_NN1 and_CC practices_NN2 of_IO nonviolence_NN1 ,_, separation_NN1 from_II the_AT world_NN1 ,_, and_CC adult_NN1 baptism_NN1 (_( Hostetler_NP1 1993_MC ;_; Kraybill_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Intuitively_RR ,_, Rosol_NP1 was_VBDZ incredibly_RR lucky_JJ to_TO beat_VVI the_AT far_JJ superior_JJ Nadal_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Benedict_NP1 and_CC the_AT Vatican_NP1 in_RR21 general_RR22 believe_VV0 that_CST these_DD2 views_NN2 are_VBR condensed_VVN -_- amongst_II others_NN2 or_CC primarily_RR -_- in_II theories_NN2 of_IO gender_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Assuming_VVG that_CST clergy_NN2 ,_, like_II other_JJ political_JJ elites_NN2 ,_, like_VV0 to_TO "_" vote_VVI "_" their_APPGE preferences_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Segal_NP1 and_CC Spaeth_VVZ 1993_MC )_) ,_, sensitivity_NN1 to_II one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 personal_JJ principal_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, ideology_NN1 ,_, theology_NN1 ,_, etc._RA )_) makes_VVZ sense_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 schema_NN1 would_VM not_XX make_VVI the_AT analogy_NN1 redundant_JJ ,_, as_CSA we_PPIS2 would_VM need_VVI it_PPH1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO ascertain_VVI the_AT universal_JJ claim_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT argument_NN1 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Waller_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 minimal_JJ example_NN1 of_IO branching_JJ future_NN1 with_IW completely_RR symmetric_JJ options_NN2 :_: the_AT (_( interrupted_VVN )_) event_NN1 could_VM have_VHI developed_VVN into_II different_JJ equally_RR possible_JJ outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 need_VV0 a_AT1 historical_JJ materialism_NN1 capable_JJ of_IO discerning_VVG the_AT extent_NN1 to_II which_DDQ the_AT institutional_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO today_RT '_NULL s_ZZ1 unions_NN2 are_VBR encouraging_VVG this_DD1 in_II ways_NN2 that_CST actually_RR expand_VV0 class_NN1 identify_VV0 and_CC capacity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, this_DD1 juxtaposition_NN1 of_IO Confucian_JJ role_NN1 ethics_NN and_CC the_AT Gt_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ethics_NN of_IO role-play_NN1 argues_VVZ that_CST merely_RR living_VVG our_APPGE roles_NN2 in_II certain_JJ circumstances_NN2 presents_VVZ real_JJ moral_JJ problems_NN2 by_II failing_VVG to_TO engage_VVI in_II a_AT1 hermeneutic_JJ that_CST invites_VVZ the_AT agent_NN1 to_TO recognize_VVI the_AT status_NN1 of_IO roles_NN2 as_CSA roles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT economics_NN1 literature_NN1 contains_VVZ a_AT1 detailed_JJ examination_NN1 of_IO signaling_VVG games_NN2 ,_, to_TO name_VVI just_RR a_AT1 few_DA2 important_JJ papers_NN2 in_II this_DD1 area_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT publication_NN1 of_IO Manchu_NP1 dictionaries_NN2 and_CC comparative_JJ Manchu-Mandarin_NP1 dictionaries_NN2 shows_VVZ the_AT emphasis_NN1 China_NP1 has_VHZ placed_VVN on_II Manchu_NP1 writing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB the_AT other_JJ side_NN1 of_IO the_AT coin_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT dominant_JJ historical_JJ narrative_NN1 and_CC mainstream_JJ political_JJ culture_NN1 have_VH0 marginalised_VVN the_AT truly_RR revolutionary_JJ and_CC democratic_JJ traditions_NN2 that_CST emerged_VVD during_II the_AT English_JJ revolution_NN1 ,_, the_AT tradition_NN1 of_IO the_AT Levellers_NN2 ,_, Diggers_NN2 and_CC other_JJ radical_JJ movements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC although_CS this_DD1 approach_NN1 to_II the_AT measurement_NN1 of_IO chance_NN1 is_VBZ compatible_JJ with_IW (_( MC_NNU )_) in_II the_AT finite_JJ case_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 isn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 in_II all_DB cases_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS it_PPH1 may_VM seem_VVI that_CST both_DB2 frameworks_NN2 function_VV0 as_RG independent_JJ analytical_JJ elements_NN2 ,_, the_AT contemporary_JJ methods_NN2 of_IO capital_NN1 accumulation_NN1 and_CC women_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reproductive_JJ labour_NN1 are_VBR two_MC interconnected_JJ processes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
God_NP1 is_VBZ the_AT only_JJ genuine_JJ substance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, someone_PN1 psychologically_RR determined_VVN to_TO choose_VVI wrong_JJ actions_NN2 ,_, or_CC to_TO act_VVI for_IF bad_JJ reasons_NN2 ,_, does_VDZ not_XX deserve_VVI blame_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lenin_NP1 says_VVZ the_AT Provisional_JJ Government_NN1 talks_VVZ big_JJ about_II democracy_NN1 but_CCB does_VDZ not_XX do_VDI much_DA1 about_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ is_VBZ characteristic_JJ of_IO identity_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST it_PPH1 satisfies_VVZ Leibniz_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Law_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 clears_VVZ the_AT ground_NN1 for_IF another_DD1 theory_NN1 of_IO always-self-predicative_JJ universals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_RRQ scientists_NN2 talk_VV0 about_II climate_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 often_RR refer_VV0 not_XX only_RR to_II dynamic_JJ meteorological_JJ variables_NN2 ,_, but_CCB to_II a_AT1 more_RGR extended_JJ set_NN1 of_IO variables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Habermas_NN2 said_VVD ,_, rational-critical_JJ debate_NN1 "_" was_VBDZ supposed_JJ to_TO transform_VVI voluntas_NN2 into_II a_AT1 ratio_NN1 "_" (_( 1989_MC ,_, p._NN1 83_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR while_CS the_AT Frankfurt_NP1 School_NN1 deplored_VVD the_AT alleged_JJ fact_NN1 that_CST revolution_NN1 has_VHZ become_VVN impossible_JJ ,_, hence_RR frequently_RR adopting_VVG a_AT1 politics_NN1 of_IO resignation_NN1 ,_, the_AT Birmingham_NP1 school_NN1 seemed_VVD often_RR to_TO imply_VVI that_DD1 revolution_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX ,_, or_CC no_RR21 longer_RR22 ,_, necessary_JJ ,_, entailing_VVG a_AT1 reformist_JJ politics_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 typically_RR neo-Keynesian_JJ character_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT author_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 opinion_NN1 ,_, the_AT crisis_NN1 of_IO Marxism_NN1 is_VBZ so_RG complete_JJ and_CC general_NN1 ,_, there_EX are_VBR so_RG few_DA2 real_JJ followers_NN2 of_IO Karl_NP1 Marx_NP1 left_VVD (_( '_NULL you_PPY can_VM count_VVI them_PPHO2 on_II your_APPGE fingers_NN2 '_NULL )_) that_CST the_AT author_NN1 is_VBZ concerned_JJ that_CST Marxism_NN1 could_VM be_VBI '_NULL completely_RR discarded_VVN '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Focusing_VVG on_II central_JJ Texas_NP1 enables_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO test_VVI the_AT applicability_NN1 of_IO Maher_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 2011_MC )_) findings_NN2 to_II a_AT1 very_RG different_JJ religious_JJ landscape_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Classification_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX only_RR the_AT basis_NN1 on_II which_DDQ the_AT critic_NN1 assigns_VVZ value_NN1 but_CCB also_RR is_VBZ the_AT main_JJ wherewithal_NN1 for_IF choosing_VVG which_DDQ other_JJ suboperations_NN2 of_IO criticism_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 description_NN1 ,_, contextualization_NN1 ,_, elucidation_NN1 ,_, interpretation_NN1 ,_, and_CC analysis_NN1 ,_, are_VBR appropriate_JJ to_TO engage_VVI in_RP ,_, and_CC what_DDQ they_PPHS2 should_VM involve_VVI ,_, in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO explain_VVI why_RRQ an_AT1 artwork_NN1 has_VHZ value_NN1 and/or_CC disvalue_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 light_II32 of_II33 this_DD1 analysis_NN1 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 FLO_NP1 abortion_NN1 is_VBZ always_RR morally_RR acceptable_JJ when_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ done_VDN before_II totipotency_NN1 ends_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 seems_VVZ therefore_RR that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR not_XX in_II31 possession_II32 of_II33 an_AT1 adequate_JJ hierarchical_JJ account_NN1 after_II all_DB ._. 
</s>
<s>
Take_VV0 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT similarity_NN1 relation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Shifting_VVG from_II a_AT1 criminalization_NN1 model_NN1 to_II a_AT1 public_JJ health_NN1 model_NN1 for_IF dealing_VVG with_IW drug_NN1 addiction_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 positive_JJ development_NN1 in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 will_VM conclude_VVI by_II drawing_VVG certain_JJ guidelines_NN2 from_II all_DB this_DD1 for_IF socialist_JJ strategy_NN1 in_II the_AT twenty-first_MD century_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, the_AT meaning_NN1 of_IO the_AT concept_NN1 is_VBZ specified_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 a_AT1 procedure_NN1 for_IF judging_VVG whether_CSW some_DD empirical_JJ phenomenon_NN1 falls_VVZ under_II biological_JJ information_NN1 as_II a_AT1 kind_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 passage_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST when_CS Plato_NP1 speaks_VVZ of_IO '_NULL rhythm_NN1 and_CC music_NN1 '_NULL as_CSA good_JJ imitations_NN2 of_IO the_AT manners_NN2 of_IO men_NN2 ,_, he_PPHS1 is_VBZ speaking_VVG of_IO dance_NN1 and_CC music_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 refer_VV0 the_AT reader_NN1 again_RT to_II Section_NN1 53_MC of_IO for_IF an_AT1 exposition_NN1 of_IO Kit_NN1 Fine_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 variable_JJ domain_NN1 semantics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Along_II21 with_II22 religious_JJ beliefs_NN2 ,_, practicing_VVG religion_NN1 in_II a_AT1 private_JJ setting_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 dimension_NN1 of_IO religiosity_NN1 that_CST can_VM play_VVI a_AT1 role_NN1 in_II enhancing_VVG a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO security_NN1 and_CC coherence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, when_CS a_AT1 father_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX act_VVI like_II a_AT1 father_NN1 ,_, then_RT the_AT son_NN1 need_VM not_XX be_VBI obedient_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, Wonda_NP1 may_VM wonder_VVI which_DDQ role_NN1 unicornhood_NN1 (_( or_CC any_DD other_JJ alien_JJ property_NN1 )_) plays_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Mindy_NN1 judges_VVZ Arthur_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 paintings_NN2 to_TO be_VBI aesthetically_RR suboptimal_JJ and_CC highly_RR values_VVZ the_AT aesthetic_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT foregoing_JJ arguments_NN2 fall_VV0 short_JJ of_IO an_AT1 argument_NN1 for_IF the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST agents_NN2 have_VH0 imprecise_JJ credences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Beatles_NP2 '_NULL "_" Blackbird_NN1 "_" and_CC Ed_NP1 Sheeran_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 recent_JJ pop_NN1 single_NN1 "_" The_AT A_ZZ1 Team_NN1 "_" both_RR feature_VV0 birdsong_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, compounding_VVG machinations_NN2 by_II local_JJ government_NN1 ,_, courts_NN2 and_CC the_AT acftu_NN1 itself_PPX1 to_II blunt_JJ China_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 new_JJ labour_NN1 laws_NN2 are_VBR mobility_NN1 and_CC fragmentation_NN1 strategies_NN2 of_IO transnational_JJ capital_NN1 within_II China_NP1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 way_NN1 ,_, liberality_NN1 ,_, along_II21 with_II22 other_JJ virtues_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 generosity_NN1 ,_, charity_NN1 ,_, and_CC mercy_NN1 ,_, perfect_VV0 the_AT virtue_NN1 of_IO justice_NN1 by_II better_RRR enabling_VVG it_PPH1 to_TO achieve_VVI its_APPGE end_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 well-ordered_JJ community_NN1 ,_, as_CSA when_CS acts_NN2 of_IO forgiveness_NN1 serve_VV0 to_TO restore_VVI well-ordered_JJ relationships_NN2 after_II civil_JJ war_NN1 (_( Philpott_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC :_: 271-273_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Pretty_JJ Month_NNT1 of_IO May_NPM1 (_( 1970_MC )_) depicting_VVG a_AT1 naked_JJ protest_NN1 sit-in_NN1 in_II Brussels_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR whilst_CS commendably_RR recuperating_VVG something_PN1 of_IO the_AT dialectical_JJ vision_NN1 Marx_NP1 originally_RR offered_VVN and_CC which_DDQ the_AT Frankfurt_NP1 School_NN1 reduced_VVN to_II indignation_NN1 and_CC despair_NN1 ,_, the_AT Birmingham-_JJ school_NN1 line_NN1 of_IO neo-Marxism_NN1 tended_VVD for_IF its_APPGE part_NN1 to_TO forget_VVI that_CST Marx_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 dialectics_NN2 had_VHD a_AT1 revolutionary_JJ goal_NN1 ,_, and_CC was_VBDZ meant_VVN not_XX only_RR to_TO represent_VVI capitalism_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE striking_JJ contradictions_NN2 but_CCB to_TO transcend_VVI it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT latter_DA has_VHZ been_VBN attributed_VVN to_II Chatman_NP1 ,_, Levinson_NP1 ,_, Wilson_NP1 ,_, and_CC others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
True_JJ ,_, my_APPGE terminology-_JJ '_NULL De_NP1 Morgan_NP1 laws_NN2 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL complements_VVZ '_NULL ,_, and_CC so_RR on-is_VBZ negativistic_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF after_II all_DB ,_, during_II cognitive_JJ "_" business_NN1 as_RR21 usual_RR22 ,_, "_" things_NN2 occur_VV0 to_II us_PPIO2 as_CS21 if_CS22 from_II nowhere_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. ._. Marx_NP1 admits_VVZ that_CST "_" political_JJ power_NN1 ..._... is_VBZ merely_RR the_AT organized_JJ power_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 class_NN1 for_IF oppressing_VVG another_DD1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 further_JJR population_NN1 ,_, made_VVD up_RP of_IO two_MC unrelated_JJ subpopulations_NN2 ,_, is_VBZ of_RR21 course_RR22 not_XX very_RG well_RR interconnected_VVD with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 reproductive_JJ competition_NN1 ,_, and_CC so_RR any_DD reasonable_JJ account_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 should_VM register_VVI that_DD1 fact_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ resembles_VVZ a_AT1 highly_RR stylised_JJ hagiographic_JJ account_NN1 was_VBDZ intended_VVN to_TO explain_VVI the_AT ability_NN1 of_IO Shaykh_NP1 '_NULL Abd_NP1 al-Fattah_NP1 to_TO foresee_VVI the_AT future_NN1 through_II basira_NN1 (_( internal_JJ vision_NN1 achieved_VVN by_II heart_NN1 but_CCB not_XX by_II reasoning_NN1 or_CC sense_NN1 perception_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD generalization_NN1 of_IO the_AT Routley-Meyer_NP1 framework_NN1 will_VM be_VBI required_VVN in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO capture_VVI as_RG many_DA2 logics_NN2 as_CSA possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II turn_NN1 ,_, the_AT goal_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 entity_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 toward_II which_DDQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ '_NULL directively_RR organized_VVN '_NULL in_II the_AT sense_NN1 promoted_VVN by_II theorists_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 Sommerhoff_NP1 (_( &lsqb;_( 1950_MC &rsqb;_) )_) and_CC Nagel_NP1 (_( &lsqb;_( 1977_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 would_VM also_RR greatly_RR embolden_NN1 Kadet-inspired_JJ counter-revolutionary_JJ forces_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT widespread_JJ attempts_NN2 to_TO overcome_VVI the_AT very_JJ distinction_NN1 between_II us_PPIO2 and_CC them_PPHO2 ,_, to_TO reject_VVI ascribed_JJ identities_NN2 ,_, and_CC to_TO defend_VVI the_AT plurality_NN1 of_IO lifestyles_NN2 and_CC backgrounds_NN2 fostered_VVD an_AT1 inspiring_JJ conjunction_NN1 of_IO artistic_JJ ,_, intellectual_NN1 ,_, and_CC political_JJ dimensions_NN2 ,_, shaping_VVG new_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO knowledge_NN1 production_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Using_VVG a_AT1 particular_JJ model_NN1 for_IF predictive_JJ purposes_NN2 therefore_RR requires_VVZ an_AT1 argument_NN1 to_II the_AT effect_NN1 that_CST the_AT model_NN1 is_VBZ structurally_RR stable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, he_PPHS1 may_VM intend_VVI that_CST he_PPHS1 and_CC a_AT1 boulder_NN1 destroy_VV0 the_AT house_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II comparing_VVG the_AT role_NN1 of_IO the_AT virtues_NN2 within_II relationships_NN2 between_II practitioners_NN2 in_II the_AT same_DA organizations_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE role_NN1 in_II relationships_NN2 between_II practitioners_NN2 in_II different_JJ organizations_NN2 ,_, researchers_NN2 may_VM be_VBI able_JK to_TO disentangle_VVI the_AT differing_JJ ways_NN2 in_II which_DDQ practices_NN2 and_CC networks_NN2 of_IO giving_VVG and_CC receiving_VVG ,_, respectively_RR ,_, promote_VV0 the_AT virtues_NN2 within_RL and_CC between_II organizations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB since_CS such_DA a_AT1 theorist_NN1 probably_RR thinks_VVZ -_- as_CSA Nicholas_NP1 of_IO Paris_NP1 indeed_RR seems_VVZ to_TO do_VDI (_( Hansen_NP1 ,_, '_NULL Strange_NP1 Finds_VVZ '_NULL ,_, 153_MC )_) -_- that_CST all_DB relations_NN2 are_VBR founded_VVN on_II nonrelational_JJ features_NN2 of_IO the_AT relata_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 might_VM appeal_VVI to_II this_DD1 idea_NN1 and_CC say_VVI that_CST the_AT difference_NN1 between_II Sophroniscus_NP1 being_VBG the_AT father_NN1 of_IO Socrates_NP1 and_CC Socrates_NP1 being_VBG the_AT father_NN1 of_IO Sophroniscus_NN1 would_VM be_VBI in_II the_AT way_NN1 those_DD2 relations_NN2 are_VBR founded_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO conclude_VVI ,_, there_EX is_VBZ much_DA1 to_TO gain_VVI by_II choosing_VVG a_AT1 self-reflective_JJ comparative_JJ approach_NN1 attentive_JJ to_II how_RRQ material_NN1 and_CC immaterial_JJ cultures_NN2 are_VBR cross-fertilised_JJ and_CC hybridised_VVN when_CS they_PPHS2 circulate_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 then_RT wrote_VVD memos_NN2 for_IF codes_NN2 ,_, through_II which_DDQ we_PPIS2 further_RRR analyzed_VVD the_AT content_NN1 of_IO the_AT text_NN1 that_CST fell_VVD within_II the_AT code_NN1 and_CC identified_VVN variation_NN1 in_II how_RRQ the_AT topic_NN1 of_IO the_AT code_NN1 was_VBDZ presented_VVN in_II the_AT articles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 new_JJ vision_NN1 of_IO hermeneutic_JJ understanding_NN1 as_CSA we_PPIS2 see_VV0 in_II the_AT Chinese_JJ tradition_NN1 which_DDQ stresses_VVZ the_AT relational_JJ interdependence_NN1 and_CC onto-generativity_NN1 of_IO fact_NN1 and_CC norm_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, to_TO avoid_VVI simplifying_JJ discipline_NN1 divisions_NN2 ,_, many_DA2 philosophers_NN2 share_VV0 ,_, indeed_RR inspire_VV0 ,_, these_DD2 views_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 created_VVD an_AT1 entirely_RR new_JJ situation_NN1 which_DDQ gave_VVD the_AT tactical_JJ problems_NN2 a_AT1 completely_RR new_JJ complexion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT fact_NN1 that_CST x_ZZ1 is_VBZ a_AT1 solvable_JJ group_NN1 will_VM be_VBI abbreviated_VVN as_CSA Xf(x)_NP1 ,_, where_CS i_ZZ1 is_VBZ the_AT index_NN1 for_IF that_DD1 fact_NN1 ,_, as_CSA above_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 problem_NN1 with_IW the_AT na_FU ?_? ve_NN1 realist_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 story_NN1 regarding_II why_RRQ perceptual_JJ experiences_NN2 possess_VV0 their_APPGE distinctive_JJ phenomenology_NN1 :_: it_PPH1 can_VM '_NULL t_ZZ1 explain_VV0 the_AT phenomenological_JJ directness_NN1 of_IO illusions_NN2 and_CC hallucinations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Tomoko_NP1 Masuzawa_NP1 has_VHZ argued_VVN convincingly_RR that_DD1 European_JJ interests_NN2 defined_VVD the_AT construction_NN1 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 religion_NN1 category_NN1 in_RR21 general_RR22 (_( Masuzawa_NP1 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT ranges_NN2 should_VM maximize_VVI in-category_JJ similarity_NN1 and_CC intercategory_NN1 differences_NN2 ,_, as_CSA suggested_VVN by_II Rosch_NP1 (_( &lsqb;_( 1999a_FO &rsqb;_) )_) ,_, with_IW the_AT additional_JJ stipulation_NN1 that_CST this_DD1 maximization_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX absolute_JJ ,_, but_CCB is_VBZ relative_II21 to_II22 the_AT selected_JJ dimensions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR at_RR21 least_RR22 three_MC conditions_NN2 that_CST we_PPIS2 need_VV0 to_TO consider_VVI in_II exploring_VVG whether_CSW the_AT act_NN1 addressed_VVD society_NN1 at_RR21 large_RR22 suitably_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Laclau_NP1 ,_, the_AT mistake_NN1 of_IO earlier_JJR '_NULL historical/sociological_JJ '_NULL accounts_NN2 ,_, was_VBDZ to_TO assume_VVI a_AT1 direct_JJ ,_, determinative_JJ relation_NN1 leading_VVG from_II productive_JJ relations_NN2 to_II politics_NN1 and_CC thus_RR to_TO conclude_VVI that_DD1 ,_, when_CS such_DA a_AT1 relation_NN1 could_VM not_XX be_VBI established_VVN ,_, a_AT1 deviation_NN1 from_II some_DD proper_JJ historical-political_JJ path_NN1 had_VHD occurred_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
William_NP1 Kentridge_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 The_AT Refusal_NN1 of_IO Time_NNT1 is_VBZ an_AT1 installation_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 surplus_NN1 of_IO means_NN and_CC ideas_NN2 ,_, yet_RR they_PPHS2 are_VBR very_RG suggestive_JJ ideas_NN2 (_( Figure_NN1 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, within_II the_AT existing_JJ literature_NN1 on_II the_AT ontology_NN1 of_IO prints_NN2 ,_, there_EX seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 persistent_JJ confusion_NN1 about_II the_AT difference_NN1 between_II what_DDQ makes_VVZ a_AT1 print_NN1 an_AT1 artwork_NN1 ,_, and_CC what_DDQ makes_VVZ it_PPH1 a_AT1 genuine_JJ or_CC authentic_JJ artwork_NN1 ,_, signed_VVN or_CC in_II some_DD other_JJ way_NN1 ratified_VVN by_II a_AT1 given_JJ artist_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, some_DD defenders_NN2 of_IO endurantism_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN careful_JJ to_TO avoid_VVI commitment_NN1 to_II so-called_JJ '_NULL truly_RR '_NULL bare_JJ particulars_NN2 (_( Haslanger_NP1 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO take_VVI an_AT1 extreme_JJ example_NN1 ,_, consider_VV0 a_AT1 community_NN1 that_CST lives_VVZ in_II a_AT1 world_NN1 in_II which_DDQ ,_, as_II a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO dumb_JJ luck_NN1 ,_, no_AT explosions_NN2 ever_RR occur_VV0 ,_, even_CS21 though_CS22 ,_, on_II many_DA2 occasions_NN2 ,_, an_AT1 explosion_NN1 could_VM easily_RR have_VHI occurred_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Its_APPGE functional_JJ profile_NN1 corresponds_VVZ closely_RR to_II the_AT RPE_NN1 quantity_NN1 in_II the_AT model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT resource_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 exhibited_VVN by_II N_ZZ1 differs_VVZ from_II the_AT "_" limited_JJ use_NN1 "_" resource_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 of_IO linear_JJ logic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO ISIS_NP1 the_AT overcoming_NN1 of_IO symbolist_JJ rhetoric_NN1 signifies_VVZ a_AT1 clear_JJ shift_NN1 towards_II Futurism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST the_AT crucial_JJ premise_NN1 here_RL is_VBZ a_AT1 version_NN1 of_IO the_AT principle_NN1 "_" ex_II nihilo_NN1 nihil_FW fit_VV0 "_" –_- nothing_PN1 comes_VVZ from_II nothing_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 example_NN1 description_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, "_" You_PPY meet_VV0 Tim_NP1 at_II church_NN1 or_CC at_II a_AT1 religious_JJ event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 to_II the_AT rest_NN1 of_IO Latin_JJ America_NP1 ,_, because_II21 of_II22 the_AT social_JJ and_CC political_JJ conservatism_NN1 of_IO Colombia_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 strategically_RR placed_VVN coffee-workers_NN2 ,_, in_II the_AT 1930s_MC2 and_CC '_NULL 40s_MC2 Colombia_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 radical_JJ democratic_JJ movements_NN2 ;_; trade_NN1 unions_NN2 in_II the_AT oil_NN1 ,_, bananas_NN2 ,_, and_CC transport_NN1 sectors_NN2 ,_, peasant_NN1 leagues_NN2 ,_, indigenous_JJ groups_NN2 ,_, students_NN2 ,_, artisans_NN2 ,_, intellectuals_NN2 ;_; did_VDD not_XX forge_VVI an_AT1 independent_JJ or_CC enduring_JJ political_JJ vehicle_NN1 through_II which_DDQ to_TO challenge_VVI the_AT bi-partisan_JJ system_NN1 and_CC represent_VVI themselves_PPX2 as_II a_AT1 national-popular_JJ bloc_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II my_APPGE view_NN1 ,_, if_CS one_PN1 really_RR wants_VVZ to_TO be_VBI radical_JJ on_II VAT_NN1 ,_, then_RT the_AT most_RGT promising_JJ direction_NN1 to_TO take_VVI is_VBZ looking_VVG at_II cases_NN2 where_RRQ cogency_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX matter_VVI for_IF the_AT interested_JJ parties_NN2 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 being_VBG objectively_RR absent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Smale_NP1 (_( 1966_MC )_) showed_VVD that_CST structural_JJ stability_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX generic_JJ in_II the_AT class_NN1 of_IO diffeomorphisms_NN2 on_II a_AT1 manifold_NN1 :_: the_AT set_NN1 of_IO structurally_RR stable_JJ systems_NN2 is_VBZ open_JJ but_CCB not_XX dense_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Federici_NP1 analyses_VVZ reproduction_NN1 and_CC the_AT disciplining_NN1 of_IO women_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 bodies_NN2 during_II the_AT original_JJ capital_NN1 accumulation_NN1 in_II Europe_NP1 ,_, asking_VVG how_RRQ to_TO account_VVI for_IF the_AT execution_NN1 of_IO hundreds_NNO2 of_IO thousands_NNO2 of_IO women_NN2 as_CSA witches_NN2 and_CC why_RRQ '_NULL the_AT rise_NN1 of_IO capitalism_NN1 was_VBDZ coeval_JJ with_IW a_AT1 war_NN1 against_II women_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, I_PPIS1 argue_VV0 that_CST the_AT visceral_JJ element_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ tends_VVZ to_TO accompany_VVI gustatory_JJ taste_NN1 ,_, ought_VMK to_TO be_VBI interpreted_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 its_APPGE generative_JJ contribution_NN1 to_II the_AT creation_NN1 of_IO concepts_NN2 through_II metaphor_NN1 ,_, rather_CS21 than_CS22 as_II a_AT1 muddying_JJ influence_NN1 that_CST prevents_VVZ clarity_NN1 of_IO discrimination_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 problem_NN1 is_VBZ much_RR deeper_RRR than_CSN the_AT fanciful_JJ example_NN1 of_IO John_NP1 winning_VVG the_AT thermometer_NN1 in_II a_AT1 bet_NN1 would_VM suggest_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, the_AT moral_JJ case_NN1 looks_VVZ to_TO be_VBI in_II the_AT same_DA boat_NN1 as_CSA the_AT aesthetic_JJ case_NN1 with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 the_AT Dependence_NN1 point_NN1 ,_, so_CS they_PPHS2 stand_VV0 or_CC fall_VV0 together_RL :_: if_CS Dependence_NN1 shows_VVZ aesthetic_JJ realism_NN1 to_TO be_VBI implausible_JJ ,_, its_APPGE counterpart_NN1 would_VM show_VVI moral_JJ realism_NN1 to_TO be_VBI implausible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT production_NN1 of_IO social_JJ institutions_NN2 is_VBZ a_AT1 contested_JJ process_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 key_JJ question_NN1 that_CST arises_VVZ is_VBZ why_RRQ the_AT Zimbabweans_NP2 participated_VVD in_II a_AT1 shift_NN1 system_NN1 that_CST so_RG greatly_RR disadvantaged_VVD them_PPHO2 in_II a_AT1 context_NN1 where_RRQ the_AT South_NP1 African_JJ reclaimers_NN2 did_VDD not_XX have_VHI legal_JJ or_CC formal_JJ authority_NN1 to_TO regulate_VVI the_AT labour_NN1 process_NN1 at_II the_AT dump_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ,_, both_RR Ilyenkov_NP1 and_CC Korovikov_NP1 were_VBDR '_NULL denounced_VVN '_NULL as_CSA '_NULL gnose-_JJ ologists_NN2 '_NULL (_( i.e._REX '_NULL epistemologists_NN2 '_NULL in_II modern_JJ terminology_NN1 )_) who_PNQS were_VBDR dragging_VVG philosophy_NN1 '_NULL into_II the_AT stuffy_JJ realm_NN1 of_IO thinking_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II 2006_MC ,_, education_NN1 and_CC socioeconomic_JJ class_NN1 were_VBDR associated_VVN with_IW lower_JJR scores_NN2 on_II measures_NN2 of_IO beliefs_NN2 ,_, but_CCB higher_JJR scores_NN2 on_II attendance_NN1 at_II services_NN2 and_CC religious_JJ activities_NN2 (_( Suh_NP1 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE mission_NN1 statement_NN1 expresses_VVZ the_AT institution_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 goal_NN1 of_IO "_" training_NN1 ,_, educating_VVG ,_, and_CC preparing_VVG ministers_NN2 "_" (_( Southern_JJ Baptist_JJ Theological_JJ Seminary_NN1 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Carroll_NP1 we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX even_RR experience_VVI aesthetic_JJ pleasure_NN1 in_II contemplating_VVG such_DA works_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA well_RR as_CSA self-referentiality_JJ ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR see_VV0 that_CST poems_NN2 acquire_VV0 a_AT1 kind_NN1 of_IO critical_JJ character_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT quasi-revolutionary_JJ situation_NN1 of_IO 1918-19_MCMC the_AT German_JJ Social-Democratic_JJ Party_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX '_NULL less_RGR revolutionary_JJ '_NULL ,_, '_NULL less_RGR militant_JJ '_NULL ,_, '_NULL more_DAR careerist_NN1 '_NULL than_CSN its_APPGE communist_JJ competitors_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ an_AT1 openly_RR counter-revolutionary_JJ party_NN1 that_CST worked_VVD furiously_RR to_TO save_VVI capitalism_NN1 and_CC the_AT capitalist_JJ state_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 paradigm_NN1 provides_VVZ the_AT terms_NN2 by_II which_DDQ we_PPIS2 determine_VV0 whether_CSW31 or_CSW32 not_CSW33 global_JJ inequality_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 problem_NN1 of_IO justice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hajar_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 claims_VVZ about_II sexual_JJ and_CC ethnic_JJ identifications_NN2 can_VM therefore_RR be_VBI read_VVN as_II an_AT1 account_NN1 of_IO intersectionality_NN1 (_( Crenshaw_NP1 1991_MC ;_; Wekker_NP1 and_CC Lutz_NP1 2001_MC ;_; Buitelaar_NP1 2006_MC )_) ,_, more_RGR specifically_RR as_II an_AT1 account_NN1 that_CST can_VM be_VBI understood_VVN according_II21 to_II22 McCall_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 typology_NN1 as_CSA one_MC1 of_IO '_NULL intra-categorical_JJ complexity_NN1 '_NULL -_- that_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 narration_NN1 of_IO '_NULL the_AT distinct_JJ and_CC frequently_RR conflicting_JJ dynamics_NN that_CST shaped_JJ &lsqb;_( Hajar_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 &rsqb;_) lived_VVD experience_NN1 '_NULL (_( 2005_MC ,_, 1780_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 are_VBR truth-directed_JJ ,_, yet_RR neither_DD1 is_VBZ proper_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD philosophical_JJ works_NN are_VBR more_RGR comparative_JJ than_CSN others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS Alice_NP1 does_VDZ not_XX have_VHI access_NN1 to_II the_AT flamethrower_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 would_VM not_XX be_VBI moral_JJ obstacles_NN2 vis-a-vis_II her_PPHO1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Instead_RR ,_, it_PPH1 should_VM be_VBI understood_VVN as_II the_AT contraposition_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 second-order_JJ claim_NN1 about_II morality_NN1 in_RR21 general_RR22 and_CC ,_, hence_RR ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 desideratum_NN1 for_IF any_DD moral_JJ principle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Proposition_VV0 1_MC1 If_CS T_ZZ1 +_FO is_VBZ a_AT1 definitional_JJ extension_NN1 of_IO T_ZZ1 ,_, then_RT T_ZZ1 +_FO is_VBZ a_AT1 conservative_JJ extension_NN1 of_IO T._NP1 This_DD1 result_NN1 demonstrates_VVZ that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT best_JJT way_NN1 to_TO understand_VVI kinaesthetic-visual_JJ matching_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recall_VV0 that_CST the_AT first_MD part_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 constraint_NN1 requires_VVZ that_CST the_AT variables_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 model_NN1 map_NN1 onto_II the_AT mechanism_NN1 of_IO interest_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT entities_NN2 ,_, activities_NN2 ,_, and_CC organizational_JJ features_NN2 of_IO the_AT target_NN1 system_NN1 producing_VVG the_AT phenomena_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ suggested_VVN here_RL that_CST a_AT1 virtueethical_JJ analysis_NN1 informed_VVN by_II Confucianism_NN1 can_VM capture_VVI intuitions_NN2 about_II the_AT need_NN1 to_TO cultivate_VVI flourishing_VVG in_II sports_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA we_PPIS2 have_VH0 seen_VVN ,_, Frankfurt_NP1 thinks_VVZ that_CST to_TO take_VVI equality_NN1 as_II a_AT1 moral_JJ ideal_NN1 would_VM be_VBI to_TO treat_VVI it_PPH1 as_II a_AT1 final_JJ end_NN1 -_- and_CC ,_, indeed_RR ,_, as_CSA an_AT1 important_JJ one_PN1 to_II which_DDQ other_JJ ,_, non-trivial_JJ ends_NN2 are_VBR subordinate_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, again_RT ,_, where_CS exactly_RR is_VBZ the_AT paradox_NN1 ,_, except_II21 for_II22 the_AT likely_JJ tension_NN1 embedded_VVN in_II the_AT above_JJ question_NN1 of_IO striking_VVG the_AT best_JJT balance_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 knowledge_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 appearance_NN1 is_VBZ compared_VVN with_IW the_AT mirror_NN1 image_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB that_DD1 cost_NN1 should_VM be_VBI the_AT same_DA at_II each_DD1 delay_NN1 duration_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS Hampton_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 first_MD monkey_NN1 derived_VVD an_AT1 increasing_JJ benefit_NN1 from_II opting_VVG out_RP as_II the_AT delay_NN1 increased_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT two_MC parties_NN2 became_VVD engaged_VVN in_II long_JJ technical_JJ discussions_NN2 ,_, and_CC in_II the_AT end_NN1 the_AT expert_NN1 tried_VVD to_TO avoid_VVI responsibility_NN1 for_IF designing_VVG a_AT1 circuit_NN1 that_CST didn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 work_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB if_CS we_PPIS2 adapt_VV0 the_AT case_NN1 so_BCL21 as_BCL22 to_TO suggest_VVI commitment_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 starts_VVZ to_TO look_VVI more_RRR like_II a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO trust_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Capital_NN1 (_( M_ZZ1 )_) expands_VVZ value_NN1 to_TO accumulate_VVI more_DAR capital_NN1 (_( Mi_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
X_ZZ1 Y_ZZ1 signifies_VVZ that_CST if_CS X_ZZ1 satisfies_VVZ the_AT success_NN1 condition_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 belief_NN1 change_NN1 ,_, then_RT Y_ZZ1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI its_APPGE outcome_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ impossible_JJ to_TO increase_VVI the_AT capacity_NN1 to_TO exert_VVI effort_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Mencius_NN1 asserts_VVZ that_CST moral_JJ principle_NN1 is_VBZ comprised_VVN of_IO ethical_JJ emotions_NN2 of_IO the_AT four_MC beginnings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 one_PN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 sub-event_NN1 of_IO the_AT other_JJ ,_, that_CST they_PPHS2 relate_VV0 to_II other_JJ events_NN2 in_II a_AT1 certain_JJ way_NN1 ,_, and_RR31 so_RR32 on_RR33 ,_, all_DB are_VBR non-local_JJ features_NN2 that_CST can_VM contribute_VVI to_II what_DDQ the_AT chance_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 event_NN1 is_VBZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO be_VBI direct_JJ and_CC honest_JJ is_VBZ not_XX safe_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interestingly_RR ,_, David_NP1 Biale_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 introduction_NN1 to_II his_APPGE section_NN1 on_II Judaism_NN1 ,_, in_II the_AT same_DA volume_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ careful_JJ to_TO distinguish_VVI the_AT presumption_NN1 of_IO some_DD participants_NN2 for_IF how_RRQ the_AT Tanakh_NN1 was_VBDZ produced_VVN from_II how_RRQ scholars_NN2 discuss_VV0 it_PPH1 :_: '_NULL it_PPH1 is_VBZ the_AT product_NN1 of_IO many_DA2 hands_NN2 ,_, including_VVG even_RR the_AT Torah_NP1 ,_, which_DDQ tradition_NN1 holds_VVZ to_TO have_VHI been_VBN written_VVN by_II Moses_NP1 ,_, he_PPHS1 writes_VVZ (_( Miles_NP1 56_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Islamophobia_NN1 constructs_NN2 the_AT figure_NN1 of_IO '_NULL the_AT Muslim_JJ '_NULL ,_, just_RR as_RG other_JJ racisms_NN2 construct_VV0 other_JJ ,_, often_RR racialised_VVN ,_, categories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
OIC_NP1 is_VBZ a_AT1 synchronic_JJ principle_NN1 :_: it_PPH1 relates_VVZ obligations_NN2 and_CC abilities_NN2 at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Still_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM be_VBI sure_JJ they_PPHS2 '_NULL re_II out_RP there_RL :_: given_VVN the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO plentitude_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ says_VVZ that_CST every_AT1 way_NN1 things_NN2 could_VM be_VBI is_VBZ a_AT1 way_NN1 things_NN2 are_VBR ,_, each_DD1 possible_JJ person_NN1 exists_VVZ in_II some_DD world_NN1 or_CC other_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Wasserman_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 idea_NN1 (_( credited_VVN to_II John_NP1 Hawthorne_NP1 in_II a_AT1 footnote_NN1 )_) is_VBZ that_CST an_AT1 object_NN1 a_AT1 is_VBZ bent_VVN simpliciter_NN1 just_RR in_CS21 case_CS22 it_PPH1 bears_VVZ the_AT dyadic_JJ bent-at_II relation_NN1 to_II every_AT1 time_NNT1 at_II which_DDQ it_PPH1 exists_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 relates_VVZ more_RGR generally_RR to_II a_AT1 conjecture_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX possible_JJ to_TO define_VVI intensional_JJ connectives_NN2 from_II extensional_JJ notions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Faith_NN1 can_VM plausibly_RR resist_VVI counterevidence_NN1 but_CCB it_PPH1 can_VM not_XX go_VVI against_II the_AT evidence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, unlike_II some_DD of_IO the_AT cases_NN2 that_CST Shiffrin_NP1 describes_VVZ that_CST contain_VV0 unproblematic_JJ promissory_JJ content_NN1 ,_, the_AT decision_NN1 to_TO become_VVI a_AT1 parent_NN1 should_VM not_XX be_VBI promised_VVN away_RL into_II someone_PN1 else_RR '_NULL s_ZZ1 discretionary_JJ control_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT theory_NN1 T_ZZ1 simply_RR identifies_VVZ the_AT line_NN1 segments_VVZ that_CST determine_VV0 the_AT same_DA line_NN1 in_II this_DD1 sense_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT term_NN1 '_NULL quasi-formal_JJ '_NULL was_VBDZ suggested_VVN as_II a_AT1 better_JJR characteristic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 genus_NN1 of_IO philosophy_NN1 ,_, comparative_JJ philosophy_NN1 serves_VVZ various_JJ important_JJ purposes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Daodejing_NP1 gives_VVZ good_JJ advice_NN1 to_II riders_NN2 ,_, and_CC ,_, perhaps_RR ,_, to_II any_DD humans_NN2 wondering_VVG about_II how_RRQ to_TO best_RRT relate_VVI to_II the_AT natural_JJ world_NN1 :_: "_" Knowing_VVG that_CST enough_RR is_VBZ enough_RR is_VBZ always_RR enough_RR ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Encyclopedic_JJ narratives_NN2 are_VBR ,_, after_II all_DB ,_, only_RR a_AT1 small_JJ subset_NN1 of_IO literary_JJ fiction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Acting_VVG intuition_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 "_" passive_JJ "_" act_NN1 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ also_RR not_XX self-awakening_JJ ,_, Nishida_NP1 stresses_NN2 (_( Nishida_NP1 1965-1966_MCMC :_: 10.470_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
SR_NP1 :_: Most_DAT of_IO the_AT essential_JJ unobservables_NN2 of_IO well-established_JJ current_JJ scientific_JJ theories_NN2 exist_VV0 mind-independently_RR (_( Devitt_NP1 2011_MC ,_, 286_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, what_DDQ will_VM happen_VVI when_RRQ two_MC trucks_NN2 collide_VV0 ,_, one_MC1 twice_RR as_RG heavy_JJ as_II the_AT other_JJ ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, initiatives_NN2 were_VBDR taken_VVN to_TO empower_VVI disadvantaged_JJ Muslims_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ reinforced_VVD the_AT image_NN1 of_IO Muslims_NN2 as_CSA objects_NN2 of_IO tolerance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II a_AT1 liar_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 paradox_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 not_XX only_RR do_VD0 not_XX know_VVI which_DDQ view_VV0 to_TO uphold_VVI ;_; we_PPIS2 return_VV0 to_TO square_VVI one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA modern_JJ Confucian_JJ scholar_NN1 XU_NP1 Fuguan_NP1 puts_VVZ it_PPH1 ,_, "_" Confucius_NP1 opened_VVD up_RP an_AT1 internal_JJ world_NN1 of_IO moral_JJ character_NN1 ,_, ..._... 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR through_II discovering_VVG this_DD1 world_NN1 of_IO moral_JJ character_NN1 inside_RL can_VV0 a_AT1 person_NN1 create_VVI himself_PPX1 and_CC continuously_RR raise_VVI himself_PPX1 beyond_II the_AT ordinary_JJ animal_NN1 realm_NN1 ,_, and_CC thereby_RR expand_VV0 and_CC extend_VV0 one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 life_NN1 energy_NN1 infinitely_RR ,_, and_CC become_VV0 an_AT1 inexhaustible_JJ source_NN1 of_IO value_NN1 for_IF all_DB activities_NN2 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
For_IF ?_? (_( x_ZZ1 )_) a_AT1 conjunction_NN1 ,_, disjunction_NN1 ,_, or_CC conditional_NN1 ,_, the_AT result_NN1 follows_VVZ from_II the_AT definitions_NN2 in_II the_AT semantics_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT results_NN2 in_II lines_NN2 (_( 4.6_MC )_) ,_, (_( 4.7_MC )_) ,_, and_CC (_( 4.12_MC )_) about_II how_RRQ acts_NN2 on_II conjunctions_NN2 ,_, disjunctions_NN2 ,_, and_CC conditionals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA we_PPIS2 shall_VM see_VVI ,_, the_AT pejorative_JJ assessment_NN1 of_IO priestly_JJ or_CC institutionalized_JJ authoritarianism_NN1 and_CC domination_NN1 forms_VVZ part_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 detailed_JJ critique_NN1 of_IO misguided_JJ religious_JJ conceptions_NN2 and_CC practices_NN2 that_CST distract_VV0 us_PPIO2 from_II our_APPGE autonomous_JJ capacity_NN1 to_TO realize_VVI the_AT moral_JJ law_NN1 in_II our_APPGE lives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Having_VHG argued_VVN that_CST fit-relevant_JJ reasons_NN2 for_IF amusement_NN1 are_VBR best_RRT conceived_VVN of_IO as_RG non-compelling_JJ ,_, and_CC having_VHG highlighted_VVN some_DD of_IO the_AT implications_NN2 that_CST this_DD1 account_NN1 would_VM have_VHI for_IF the_AT faultless_JJ disagreement_NN1 debate_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 '_NULL d_ZZ1 like_VV0 to_TO turn_VVI our_APPGE attention_NN1 to_II the_AT social_JJ dimension_NN1 of_IO joke_NN1 telling_VVG as_CSA it_PPH1 too_RR might_VM be_VBI thought_VVN to_TO challenge_VVI FA_NP1 accounts_NN2 of_IO humor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX41 is_REX42 to_REX43 say_REX44 that_CST while_CS such_DA stories_NN2 are_VBR clearly_RR not_XX factual_JJ accounts_NN2 of_IO events_NN2 ,_, these_DD2 stories_NN2 do_VD0 document_VVI something_PN1 ,_, and_CC what_DDQ they_PPHS2 document_VV0 is_VBZ neither_RR literal_JJ nor_CC incidental_JJ to_II the_AT content_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 narratives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II being_VBG prevented_VVN from_II further_RRR damaging_VVG themselves_PPX2 by_II acting_VVG viciously_RR the_AT punishments_NN2 are_VBR just_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Early_JJ Confucianism_NN1 contributed_VVN to_II the_AT design_NN1 of_IO systems_NN2 of_IO transmission_NN1 essential_JJ for_IF its_APPGE sweeping_JJ historical_JJ influence_NN1 over_II generations_NN2 in_II the_AT most_RGT populous_JJ nation_NN1 on_II earth_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Or_CC ,_, put_VVD differently_RR ,_, do_VD0 Daoist_JJ ,_, Confucian_JJ ,_, or_CC Buddhist_JJ texts_NN2 contain_VV0 an_AT1 implicit_JJ or_CC explicit_JJ understanding_NN1 of_IO agency_NN1 that_CST can_VM be_VBI construed_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 practical_JJ reasoning_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
If_CS we_PPIS2 let_VV0 u_ZZ1 A_ZZ1 (_( t_ZZ1 F_ZZ1 ,_, meeting_VVG ,_, c_ZZ1 2_MC )_) <_FO u_ZZ1 A_ZZ1 (_( t_ZZ1 f_ZZ1 ,_, meeting_VVG ,_, c_ZZ1 1_MC1 )_) ,_, then_RT an_AT1 important_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT reasoning_NN1 becomes_VVZ hidden_VVN in_II the_AT payoffs_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT games_NN2 becomes_VVZ "_" artificially_RR "_" cooperative_JJ :_: any_DD explicit_JJ encoding_NN1 of_IO the_AT opposing_JJ interests_NN2 at_II stake_NN1 is_VBZ left_VVN behind_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Admittedly_RR ,_, this_DD1 does_VDZ not_XX distinguish_VVI all_DB the_AT various_JJ kinds_NN2 of_IO social_JJ grounding_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Far_RR from_II being_VBG detrimental_JJ to_II our_APPGE understanding_NN1 of_IO reductionism_NN1 in_II science_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 degree_NN1 of_IO disagreement_NN1 about_II the_AT reduction_NN1 of_IO chemistry_NN1 could_VM in_II fact_NN1 be_VBI fruitful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT question_NN1 of_IO the_AT cognitive_JJ significance_NN1 of_IO literature_NN1 is_VBZ ultimately_RR about_II the_AT distinctive_JJ cognitive_JJ value_NN1 of_IO literature_NN1 ,_, not_XX about_II literature_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ability_NN1 to_TO mimic_VVI informative_JJ discourses_NN2 or_CC employ_VV0 devices_NN2 used_VVN in_II science_NN1 and_CC philosophy_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 thought_NN1 experiments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB a_AT1 satisfactory_JJ account_NN1 of_IO resistance_NN1 phenomena_NN2 and_CC narrative_JJ engagement_NN1 must_VM also_RR take_VVI into_II consideration_NN1 the_AT contexts_NN2 in_II which_DDQ these_DD2 propositions_NN2 are_VBR received_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Using_VVG the_AT notation_NN1 of_IO Proposition_NN1 5.1_MC ,_, in_CS21 case_CS22 f_ZZ1 ≡_NULL ,_, we_PPIS2 easily_RR have_VH0 M_MC f_RA (_( x_ZZ1 )_) =_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA tendencies_NN2 to_TO seek_VVI out_RP '_NULL just-novel-enough_DD '_NULL situations_NN2 are_VBR a_AT1 good_JJ candidate_NN1 for_IF some_DD form_NN1 of_IO innate_JJ specification_NN1 ,_, since_CS they_PPHS2 would_VM cause_VVI active_JJ agents_NN2 to_II self-structure_NN1 the_AT flow_NN1 of_IO information_NN1 in_II ways_NN2 ideally_RR suited_VVN to_II the_AT incremental_JJ acquisition_NN1 and_CC tuning_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 rich_JJ and_CC informative_JJ generative_JJ model_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE environment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, on_II this_DD1 picture_NN1 ,_, nonnaturalism_NN1 is_VBZ true_JJ if_CS DESCRIPTIVISM_NP1 is_VBZ false_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 section_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 highlight_VV0 two_MC strengths_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 account_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perelman_NN1 and_CC Olbrechts-Tyteca_NP1 identified_VVD this_DD1 simple_JJ relation_NN1 in_II the_AT arguments_NN2 from_II everyday_JJ life_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ the_AT calculus_NN1 of_IO probability_NN1 is_VBZ obviously_RR not_XX implemented_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II our_APPGE daily_JJ language_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 sometimes_RT do_VD0 use_VVI "_" human_JJ being_NN1 "_" in_II a_AT1 normative_JJ sense_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 can_VM avoid_VVI this_DD1 problem_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, not_XX by_II expanding_VVG the_AT definition_NN1 of_IO '_NULL negative_JJ consequences_NN2 '_NULL ,_, but_CCB simply_RR by_II clarifying_VVG that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR measuring_VVG the_AT expected_JJ contribution_NN1 to_II fitness_NN1 relative_II21 to_II22 an_AT1 appropriate_JJ situation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_NNT1 :_: to_II those_DD2 of_IO you_PPY whose_DDQGE work_NN1 is_VBZ currently_RR involved_VVN at_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO theory_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 challenge_VV0 you_PPY to_TO investigate_VVI the_AT newly-developing_JJ theories_NN2 of_IO gender_NN1 and_CC sexualities_NN2 as_CSA they_PPHS2 relate_VV0 to_II theories_NN2 central_JJ to_II our_APPGE field-for_NN1 example_NN1 ,_, to_II theories_NN2 of_IO organizational_JJ change_NN1 ,_, or_CC the_AT power_NN1 of_IO religious_JJ authority-and_CC as_CSA they_PPHS2 may_VM help_VVI frame_NN1 the_AT directions_NN2 of_IO our_APPGE research_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 means_VVZ there_EX will_VM be_VBI a_AT1 certain_JJ lack_NN1 of_IO predictability_NN1 about_II any_DD single_JJ case_NN1 ,_, but_CCB at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ plausible_JJ that_CST in_II the_AT long_JJ run_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 should_VM expect_VVI the_AT frequencies_NN2 of_IO these_DD2 outcomes_NN2 to_TO be_VBI pretty_RG close_RR to_II x%_FO for_IF A_ZZ1 ,_, y%_FO for_IF B_NP1 etc_RA ._. 
</s>
<s>
Then_RT Humean_JJ supervenience_NN1 of_IO the_AT nomological_JJ on_II the_AT non-nomological_JJ fails_VVZ dramatically-two_MC worlds_NN2 can_VM share_VVI the_AT same_DA Humean_JJ mosaic_NN1 and_CC the_AT same_DA nomological_JJ necessities_NN2 without_IW having_VHG the_AT same_DA laws_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II specifying_VVG what_DDQ actors_NN2 should_VM say_VVI and_CC do_VDI on_II stage_NN1 ,_, playwrights_NN2 work_VV0 in_II the_AT medium_NN1 of_IO actions_NN2 ;_; novelists_NN2 ,_, meanwhile_RR ,_, work_VV0 with_IW words_NN2 ,_, and_CC composers_NN2 work_VV0 with_IW sound_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II reading_VVG the_AT Kritik_NP1 der_FU reinen_JJ Vernunft_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, we_PPIS2 might_VM notice_VVI qualities_NN2 of_IO argumentative_JJ ingenuity_NN1 and_CC enlightened_JJ insight_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 find_VV0 worthy_JJ or_CC valuable_JJ ,_, but_CCB this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT sort_NN1 of_IO response_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ typically_RR sought_VVN when_CS an_AT1 artwork_NN1 is_VBZ presented_VVN to_II the_AT art-world_NN1 for_IF appreciation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 a_AT1 training_NN1 about_II liquid_JJ bio-waste_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
After_II all_DB ,_, when_CS applied_VVN to_II the_AT attitude_NN1 of_IO accepting_VVG the_AT negation_NN1 ,_, the_AT heuristic_JJ directs_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO accept_VVI the_AT negation_NN1 of_IO A_ZZ1 <T>_FO B_ZZ1 when_CS we_PPIS2 accept_VV0 the_AT negation_NN1 of_IO B_ZZ1 under_II the_AT supposition_NN1 of_IO A._NP1 The_AT notion_NN1 that_CST martyr_NN1 stories_NN2 might_VM construct_VVI an_AT1 identity_NN1 ,_, sometimes_RT even_RR a_AT1 '_NULL Christian_JJ '_NULL one_PN1 ,_, is_VBZ not_XX wrong_RR ,_, of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, but_CCB Derrida_NP1 pushes_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO consider_VVI other_JJ dimensions_NN2 of_IO these_DD2 stories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Higher_JJR education_NN1 of_IO any_DD kind_NN1 may_VM reduce_VVI the_AT likelihood_NN1 of_IO rejection_NN1 of_IO evolution_NN1 among_II many_DA2 UK_NP1 churchgoers_VVZ ,_, but_CCB theological_JJ conservatives_NN2 from_II any_DD tradition_NN1 will_VM tend_VVI to_TO maintain_VVI their_APPGE belief_NN1 that_CST Darwinian_JJ evolution_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX explain_VVI the_AT origin_NN1 of_IO species_NN whatever_DDQV their_APPGE educational_JJ experience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 barrier_NN1 is_VBZ what_DDQ creates_VVZ dependence_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 immigrants_NN2 to_II these_DD2 institutions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 believe_VV0 there_EX are_VBR ways_NN2 to_TO resolve_VVI it_PPH1 that_CST in_II fact_NN1 help_VV0 us_PPIO2 shed_VVI light_NN1 on_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO moral_JJ cultivation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB of_IO this_DD1 being_VBG said_VVN ,_, suppose_VV0 you_PPY are_VBR not_XX convinced_JJ that_CST the_AT realism-moralism_JJ debate_NN1 can_VM be_VBI rendered_VVN substantive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 enigmatic_JJ phrase_NN1 in_II Hegel_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 writings_NN2 on_II beauty_NN1 ,_, namely_REX :_: "_" beauty_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 is_VBZ beauty_NN1 born_VVN of_IO spirit_NN1 and_CC born_VVN again_RT ,_, "_" which_DDQ comes_VVZ to_TO be_VBI explained_VVN by_II Danto_NP1 in_II his_APPGE article_NN1 "_" Beauty_NN1 and_CC Morality_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Students_NN2 were_VBDR surveyed_VVN in_II the_AT spring_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 year_NNT1 then_RT one_MC1 final_JJ time_NNT1 eighteen_MC months_NNT2 postgraduation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT lack_NN1 of_IO relevance_NN1 constraints_NN2 in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO unconscious_JJ deliberation_NN1 one_PN1 should_VM expect_VVI the_AT reverse_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, the_AT new_JJ "_" Korean_JJ "_" system_NN1 retained_VVD its_APPGE symbolic_JJ connections_NN2 with_IW Eastern_JJ (_( Chinese_NP1 ,_, indigenous_JJ Korean_JJ ,_, traditional_JJ )_) healing_JJ traditions_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ remained_VVD crucial_JJ for_IF maintaining_VVG a_AT1 distinct_JJ identity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Congregations_NN2 that_CST employ_VV0 a_AT1 pastor_NN1 are_VBR at_RR21 least_RR22 50%_NNU less_DAR likely_JJ to_TO close_VVI than_CSN congregations_NN2 that_CST are_VBR without_IW a_AT1 pastor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF any_DD agent_NN1 a_AT1 and_CC any_DD power_NN1 P_ZZ1 ,_, a_AT1 acts_NN2 freely_RR when_CS a_AT1 exercises_NN2 a_AT1 power_NN1 P_ZZ1 that_CST is_VBZ under_II a_AT1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 control_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 definition_NN1 of_IO climate_NN1 should_VM be_VBI mathematically_RR well-defined_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT problem_NN1 with_IW Comesana_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 and_CC Kantin_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 claim_VV0 that_CST they_PPHS2 can_VM not_XX think_VVI of_IO any_DD argument_NN1 in_II31 favor_II32 of_II33 the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST Smith_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 false_JJ belief_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX do_VDI any_DD justifying_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST it_PPH1 simply_RR begs_VVZ the_AT question_NN1 against_II Williamson_NP1 who_PNQS has_VHZ offered_VVN positive_JJ arguments_NN2 for_IF the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST no_AT false_JJ belief_NN1 is_VBZ part_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 evidence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC be_VBI identities_NN2 ,_, and_CC 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC exist_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ matters_VVZ is_VBZ whether_CSW Olympism_NN1 is_VBZ still_RR Eurocentric_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT stone_NN1 and_CC the_AT grave_NN1 spoke_VVD silently_RR ,_, as_RR31 it_RR32 were_RR33 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR ,_, however_RR ,_, two_MC additional_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO his_APPGE proposal_NN1 which_DDQ bear_VV0 on_II the_AT more_RGR recent_JJ debate_NN1 about_II ICT_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Instead_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 had_VHD many_DA2 internal_JJ disagreements_NN2 and_CC refuted_VVD each_DD1 others_NN2 '_NULL arguments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT questions_NN2 I_PPIS1 am_VBM interested_JJ in_II concern_NN1 the_AT relevance_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 impact_NN1 to_II action_NN1 control_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, the_AT truth_NN1 conditions_NN2 for_IF SR_NN1 probabilities_NN2 only_RR refer_VV0 to_II a_AT1 specific_JJ setup_NN1 and_CC to_II processes_NN2 localized_VVD in_II space_NN1 and_CC time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB the_AT object_NN1 which_DDQ first_MD appeared_VVD to_TO be_VBI at_II hand_NN1 flees_VVZ more_RGR quickly_RR than_CSN it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI pursued_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II most_DAT cases_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 work_NN1 has_VHZ several_DA2 colours_NN2 or_CC contours_NN2 so_CS21 that_CS22 we_PPIS2 can_VM point_VVI out_RP how_RRQ the_AT individual_JJ colours_NN2 or_CC contours_NN2 combine_VV0 to_TO yield_VVI an_AT1 aesthetic_JJ property_NN1 such_II21 as_II22 the_AT work_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 dynamism_NN1 or_CC melancholy_JJ mood_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ no_AT need_NN1 to_TO deny_VVI that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ wonderfully_RR inspiring_JJ ,_, but_CCB its_APPGE claim_NN1 to_TO remain_VVI a_AT1 wholly_RR intellectual_JJ result_NN1 seems_VVZ hard_JJ to_TO sustain_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Again_RT ,_, (_( authentic_JJ )_) Christianity_NN1 and_CC Brahmanism_NN1 are_VBR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Schopenhauer_NP1 ,_, of_IO such_DA a_AT1 nature_NN1 since_CS ,_, on_II the_AT one_MC1 hand_NN1 ,_, Christianity_NN1 emphasizes_VVZ that_CST all_DB human_JJ beings_NN2 are_VBR children_NN2 of_IO the_AT same_DA Heavenly_JJ Father_NN1 and_CC ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, Brahmanism_NN1 emphasizes_VVZ the_AT mystical_JJ unity_NN1 of_IO all_DB of_IO creation_NN1 :_: tat_NN1 tvam_NN1 asi_NN2 (_( '_NULL that_CST are_VBR you_PPY '_NULL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA a_AT1 principle_NN1 already_RR seems_VVZ more_RGR plausible_JJ ,_, since_CS it_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX invite_VVI violations_NN2 of_IO the_AT law_NN1 of_IO non-contradiction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT idea_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 meta-logic_JJ as_CSA introduced_VVN in_II the_AT present_JJ paper_NN1 was_VBDZ triggered_VVN by_II the_AT following_JJ observations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Concerns_NN2 about_II the_AT analogy_NN1 of_IO being_NN1 appear_VV0 in_II Being_VBG and_CC Time_NNT1 in_II many_DA2 places_NN2 ,_, but_CCB of_IO interest_NN1 here_RL is_VBZ (_( SZ_NP1 :_: 201_MC ,_, BT_NP1 :_: 245_MC )_) ,_, where_CS Heidegger_NP1 notes_VVZ our_APPGE preontological_JJ understanding_NN1 of_IO being_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX yet_RR articulated_VVN in_II such_DA a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 corresponds_VVZ to_II the_AT various_JJ modes_NN2 of_IO being_VBG ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ why_RRQ Macherey_NP1 sought_VVD to_TO explain_VVI Lenin_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 materialist_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO representation_NN1 as_II a_AT1 '_NULL broken_JJ mirror_NN1 '_NULL of_IO the_AT external_JJ world_NN1 through_II the_AT latter_DA '_NULL s_ZZ1 articles_NN2 on_II Leo_NP1 Tolstoy_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Arabic_JJ version_NN1 of_IO the_AT film_NN1 was_VBDZ removed_VVN from_II YouTube_NP1 around_RG 12_MC September_NPM1 2012_MC (_( YouTube_NP1 2012a_FO )_) ,_, but_CCB the_AT English_JJ version_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ tagged_VVN in_II Arabic_JJ as_CSA '_NULL Islam_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Major_NNB Scandal_NP1 '_NULL remained_VVD online_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT governmental_JJ alternative_NN1 to_II the_AT Soviet_JJ in_II 1905_MC was_VBDZ not_XX a_AT1 provisional_JJ government_NN1 but_CCB the_AT autocracy_NN1 ,_, for_IF ,_, in_II the_AT eyes_NN2 of_IO the_AT Bolsheviks_NN2 especially_RR ,_, the_AT Soviet_NN1 itself_PPX1 had_VHD the_AT potential_JJ to_TO become_VVI the_AT provisional_JJ government_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT semantic_JJ definition_NN1 of_IO probability_NN1 functions_VVZ that_CST I_PPIS1 use_VV0 in_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 sets_VVZ it_PPH1 apart_II21 from_II22 the_AT work_NN1 of_IO Weatherson_NP1 (_( 2003_MC )_) ,_, Paris_NP1 (_( 2001_MC )_) and_CC Williams_NP1 (_( 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC while_CS (_( CON_NP1 )_) is_VBZ also_RR problematic_JJ from_II the_AT Fregean_JJ point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ worth_II pausing_VVG to_TO see_VVI that_CST the_AT reasons_NN2 Frege_NP1 would_VM have_VHI for_IF rejecting_VVG (_( CON_NP1 )_) are_VBR quite_RG different_JJ from_II those_DD2 of_IO the_AT neo-logicism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 had_VHD to_TO confront_VVI and_CC negotiate_VVI broader_JJR systems_NN2 of_IO cultural_JJ and_CC socioeconomic_JJ difference_NN1 within_II teams_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ was_VBDZ elevated_VVN by_II even_RR starker_JJR differences_NN2 between_II the_AT capacities_NN2 of_IO decision_NN1 makers_NN2 and_CC scientists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Schwitzgebel_NN1 hopes_VVZ that_CST by_II the_AT time_NNT1 you_PPY are_VBR done_VDN with_IW his_APPGE book_NN1 ,_, or_CC perhaps_RR even_RR only_RR a_AT1 few_DA2 chapters_NN2 ,_, you_PPY might_VM begin_VVI to_TO suspect_VVI a_AT1 touch_NN1 of_IO hubris_NN1 in_II such_DA an_AT1 answer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR the_AT method_NN1 is_VBZ general_JJ in_II the_AT sense_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 can_VM straightforwardly_RR be_VBI adapted_VVN to_II higher_JJR dimensions_NN2 :_: to_II maximising_VVG and_CC minimising_VVG functions_NN2 of_IO n_ZZ1 variables_NN2 subject_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 constraint_NN1 function_NN1 of_IO n_ZZ1 variables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS there_EX are_VBR any_DD infinite_JJ numbers_NN2 at_II all_DB while_CS the_AT first-order_JJ properties_NN2 of_IO the_AT real_JJ numbers_NN2 are_VBR preserved_VVN ,_, then_RT there_EX must_VM be_VBI lots_PN and_CC lots_PN of_IO them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Explicit_JJ discussions_NN2 of_IO filial_JJ piety_NN1 in_II Analects_NP1 13.18_MC about_II the_AT Duke_NN1 of_IO She_PPHS1 and_CC in_II Mencius_NP1 7A35_FO about_II Emperor_NNB Shun_NP1 simultaneously_RR reaffirm_VV0 filial_JJ piety_NN1 as_CSA morally_RR plastic_NN1 obedience_NN1 to_II fathers_NN2 and_CC its_APPGE importance_NN1 to_II the_AT early_JJ Confucian_JJ tradition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 close_VV0 this_DD1 section_NN1 by_II noting_VVG the_AT stability_NN1 of_IO atomic_JJ formulas_NN2 under_II the_AT semantics_NN1 ,_, together_RL with_IW some_DD helpful_JJ characterizations_NN2 pertaining_II21 to_II22 the_AT case_NN1 of_IO negated_JJ atomics_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ we_PPIS2 will_VM use_VVI in_II Proposition_NN1 9.6_MC to_TO produce_VVI some_DD counterexamples_NN2 to_II the_AT stability_NN1 of_IO negated_JJ atomics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS there_EX is_VBZ no_AT distinct_JJ idea_NN1 of_IO existence_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ derived_VVN from_II a_AT1 distinct_JJ impression_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ for_IF its_APPGE part_NN1 is_VBZ conjoined_VVN with_IW every_AT1 perception_NN1 ,_, then_RT no_AT idea_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 existent_JJ object_NN1 x_ZZ1 contains_VVZ a_AT1 distinct_JJ idea_NN1 of_IO existence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS the_AT details_NN2 of_IO such_DA a_AT1 response_NN1 would_VM constitute_VVI a_AT1 substantial_JJ policy_NN1 initiative_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ yet_RR to_TO be_VBI developed_VVN ,_, integrating_VVG NDCs_NP1 (_( or_CC some_DD suitable_JJ substitute_NN1 )_) into_II SDGs_NP2 would_VM seem_VVI to_TO provide_VVI a_AT1 comparatively_RR sound_JJ approach_NN1 ,_, in_II no_AT small_JJ part_NN1 because_CS such_DA an_AT1 approach_NN1 would_VM rely_VVI on_II a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO policies_NN2 and_CC initiatives_NN2 already_RR in_II existence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
ML3_FO W_ZZ1 ?_? ,_, and_CC if_CS ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Frege_NP1 had_VHD many_DA2 complaints_NN2 but_CCB the_AT most_RGT significant_JJ was_VBDZ that_DD1 Mill_NN1 had_VHD confused_VVN applications_NN2 of_IO arithmetic_NN1 with_IW arithmetic_NN1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. In_II effect_NN1 ,_, she_PPHS1 wants_VVZ a_AT1 direct_JJ answer_NN1 to_II the_AT question_NN1 concerning_II the_AT suits_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 do_VD0 not_XX claim_VVI that_DD1 Anselm_NN1 says_VVZ ,_, nor_CC does_VDZ he_PPHS1 say_VVI ,_, that_DD1 such_DA an_AT1 angel_NN1 would_VM not_XX be_VBI free_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Speaking_VVG strategically_RR ,_, Bensaid_VVD rhetorically_RR asks_VVZ :_: '_NULL can_VV0 the_AT question_NN1 of_IO the_AT state_NN1 be_VBI dissolved_VVN into_II that_DD1 of_IO powers_NN2 ?_? '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Liu_NP1 Xie_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 shift_VV0 in_II reasoning_VVG as_II a_AT1 move_NN1 to_TO valorize_VVI the_AT human_JJ wen_NN1 or_CC writing_NN1 and_CC literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 seems_VVZ correct_JJ :_: one_PN1 can_VM act_VVI for_IF reasons_NN2 that_CST one_PN1 has_VHZ not_XX explicitly_RR chosen_VVN ,_, endorsed_VVD ,_, identified_VVN with_IW or_CC even_RR entertained_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS we_PPIS2 can_VM represent_VVI each_DD1 conjunct_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 conjunctive_JJ situation_NN1 and_CC conjoin_VV0 them_PPHO2 in_II the_AT world-making_JJ language_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ easy_JJ to_TO represent_VVI Bill_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 impossible_JJ situation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR when_CS Kant_NP1 speaks_VVZ of_IO exemplarity_NN1 ,_, and_CC of_IO the_AT work_NN1 inspiring_VVG others_NN2 without_IW leading_VVG them_PPHO2 to_TO simply_RR copy_VVI or_CC reproduce_VVI the_AT same_DA work_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ this_DD1 putting_VVG oneself_PNX1 at_II risk_NN1 or_CC tarrying_VVG with_IW the_AT void_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ at_II issue_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Human_JJ Fertilisation_NN1 &;_NULL Embryology_NN1 Authority_NN1 (_( HFEA_NP1 )_) ,_, in_II31 accordance_II32 with_II33 The_AT Human_JJ Fertilisation_NN1 and_CC Embryology_NP1 (_( Mitochondrial_NP1 Donation_NN1 )_) Regulations_NN2 2015_MC ,_, is_VBZ poised_VVN to_TO license_VVI and_CC regulate_VVI the_AT technology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 call_VV0 these_DD2 promises_NN2 "_" over_II extensive_JJ "_" promises_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC evidence_NN1 shows_VVZ how_RRQ collective_JJ grievances_NN2 were_VBDR split_VVN by_II courts_NN2 and_CC unions_NN2 into_II individual_JJ cases_NN2 to_TO reduce_VVI the_AT potential_NN1 for_IF social_JJ unrest_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Metaphysics_NN1 of_IO Morals_NN2 ,_, Kant_NP1 writes_VVZ ,_, "_" one_MC1 thing_NN1 can_VM have_VHI several_DA2 qualitative_JJ perfections_NN2 "_" (_( MS_NN1 ,_, 6:386_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT most_RGT recent_JJ stage_NN1 ,_, our_APPGE country_NN1 has_VHZ experienced_VVN many_DA2 social_JJ problems_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO show_VVI this_DD1 ,_, I_PPIS1 first_MD argue_VV0 that_CST the_AT distinctive_JJ significance_NN1 of_IO the_AT interpersonal_JJ manifests_VVZ a_AT1 legitimate_JJ concern_NN1 for_IF other_JJ people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 respect_NN1 ,_, before_II unearthing_VVG the_AT tensions_NN2 at_II negative_JJ liberty_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 heart_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 argument_NN1 would_VM prove_VVI too_RG much_DA1 and_CC Kania_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 attempt_VV0 to_TO deflect_VVI this_DD1 charge_NN1 is_VBZ unsatisfactory_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 leads_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO expect_VVI that_CST individuals_NN2 belonging_VVG to_II a_AT1 religious_JJ community_NN1 will_VM report_VVI higher_JJR levels_NN2 of_IO life_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 because_CS they_PPHS2 have_VH0 a_AT1 greater_JJR availability_NN1 of_IO social_JJ support_NN1 (_( hypothesis_NN1 3c_FO )_) and_CC experience_VV0 less_DAR loneliness_NN1 (_( hypothesis_NN1 3d_NNU )_) ,_, in_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 the_AT potential_JJ spill-over_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO being_VBG embedded_VVN in_II a_AT1 religious_JJ congregation_NN1 hypothesized_VVD above_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, few_DA2 if_CS any_DD large-scale_JJ probability_NN1 samples_NN2 include_VV0 both_RR (_( a_ZZ1 )_) data_NN on_II attitudes_NN2 about_II contraception_NN1 and_CC family_NN1 planning_NN1 policy_NN1 and_CC (_( b_ZZ1 )_) appropriate_JJ items_NN2 on_II relevant_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO religious_JJ involvement_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_RR21 present_RR22 ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 direct_JJ elections_NN2 at_II the_AT county_NN1 level_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR we_PPIS2 are_VBR not_XX dis-abused_JJ of_IO the_AT notion_NN1 that_CST our_APPGE moral_JJ codes_NN2 embody_VV0 real_JJ values_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT present_JJ purpose_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, it_PPH1 will_VM suffice_VVI to_TO consider_VVI only_RR his_APPGE informal_JJ analysis_NN1 and_CC to_TO take_VVI parity_NN1 as_II the_AT paradigmatic_JJ example_NN1 of_IO non-standard_JJ value_NN1 relation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 mega_JJ church_NN1 is_VBZ located_VVN in_II a_AT1 middle-class_JJ ,_, commercial_JJ region_NN1 of_IO the_AT Southwestern_JJ city_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE congregants_NN2 are_VBR primarily_RR white_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CS31 long_CS32 as_CS33 capitalism_NN1 and_CC the_AT wage_NN1 system_NN1 rule_NN1 ,_, only_RR that_DD1 kind_NN1 of_IO work_NN1 is_VBZ considered_VVN productive_JJ which_DDQ produces_VVZ surplus_JJ value_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ creates_VVZ capitalist_JJ profit_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Drawing_VVG on_II the_AT emerging_JJ body_NN1 of_IO work_NN1 arising_VVG from_II the_AT sociology_NN1 of_IO language_NN1 and_CC religion_NN1 (_( Fishman_NP1 and_CC Omoniyi_NP1 2006_MC ;_; Omoniyi_NP1 2010_MC ;_; Rosowsky_NP1 2017_MC )_) ,_, Blommaert_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 call_NN1 (_( 2010_MC ;_; and_CC ,_, earlier_RRR ,_, 2003_MC )_) for_IF attention_NN1 to_II language_NN1 resources_NN2 rather_II21 than_II22 languages_NN2 per_RR21 se_RR22 ,_, the_AT verbal_JJ arts_NN2 performance_NN1 theory_NN1 of_IO Bauman_NP1 (_( 1974_MC ;_; Bauman_NP1 2000_MC ;_; Bauman_NP1 and_CC Briggs_NP1 1990_MC )_) and_CC the_AT globalisation_NN1 terminology_NN1 of_IO Robertson_NP1 (_( 1992_MC )_) and_CC Beyer_NP1 (_( 1994_MC )_) ,_, I_PPIS1 focus_VV0 on_II the_AT religious_JJ and_CC language_NN1 practices_NN2 of_IO young_JJ British_JJ Muslims_NN2 within_II the_AT South_NP1 Asian_JJ diaspora_NN1 who_PNQS ,_, as_II part_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE re-construction_NN1 of_IO religious_JJ and_CC linguistic_JJ practices_NN2 and_CC identities_NN2 ,_, regularly_RR perform_VV0 devotional_JJ songs_NN2 and_CC poetry_NN1 in_RR21 public_RR22 and_CC private_JJ spaces_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, Abel_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 impoverished_JJ conceptual_JJ resources_NN2 led_VVD him_PPHO1 to_TO focus_VVI on_II symbolic_JJ manipulations_NN2 and_CC computations_NN2 that_CST decreased_VVD the_AT level_NN1 of_IO epistemic_JJ guidance_NN1 shown_VVN in_II his_APPGE proof_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB first_MD a_AT1 word_NN1 about_II those_DD2 other_JJ formulations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC ,_, although_CS we_PPIS2 could_VM quibble_VVI about_II the_AT degree_NN1 to_II which_DDQ references_VVZ to_II "_" the_AT breath_NN1 of_IO life_NN1 "_" are_VBR the_AT province_NN1 of_IO religion_NN1 ,_, the_AT lead_NN1 singer_NN1 of_IO Evanescence_NP1 ,_, Amy_NP1 Lee_NP1 ,_, pines_NN2 ,_, "_" Breathe_VV0 into_II me_PPIO1 and_CC make_VV0 me_PPIO1 real_JJ ,_, Bring_VV0 me_PPIO1 to_II life_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, Mill_NP1 (_( 1882_MC )_) talked_VVD about_II a_AT1 chemical_JJ mode_NN1 of_IO causation_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ defied_VVD the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO composition_NN1 of_IO causes_NN2 (_( the_AT principle_NN1 stating_VVG that_CST the_AT effect_NN1 produced_VVN by_II two_MC causes_NN2 acting_VVG together_RL is_VBZ the_AT sum_NN1 of_IO the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO each_DD1 cause_NN1 acting_VVG independently_RR )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 say_VV0 that_CST Hitchcock_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 North_ND1 by_II Northwest_ND1 is_VBZ entertaining_JJ because_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ suspenseful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II conclusion_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 show_VV0 that_CST my_APPGE account_NN1 amounts_VVZ to_II a_AT1 specification_NN1 and_CC defense_NN1 of_IO many_DA2 of_IO the_AT literature_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 key_JJ claims_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, if_CS Gus_NP1 were_VBDR to_TO act_VVI altruistically_RR ,_, Gus_NP1 would_VM use_VVI his_APPGE inheritance_NN1 to_TO purchase_VVI the_AT needed_VVN antiviral_JJ drugs_NN2 and_CC save_VVI his_APPGE ten_MC relatives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, low-frequency_JJ traders_NN2 may_VM seem_VVI good_JJ (_( since_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR "_" investors_NN2 "_" )_) ,_, while_CS high-frequency_JJ traders_NN2 seem_VV0 bad_JJ (_( "_" mere_JJ speculators_NN2 "_" )_) ,_, based_VVN on_II nothing_PN1 more_DAR than_CSN the_AT type_NN1 of_IO inefficiency_NN1 they_PPHS2 seek_VV0 to_TO profit_VVI from_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
Once_RR21 again_RR22 ,_, there_EX are_VBR evident_JJ parallels_NN2 with_IW the_AT feigned_JJ belief_NN1 and_CC conviction_NN1 professed_VVN by_II Job_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 "_" friends_NN2 "_" discussed_VVN at_II 8_MC :_: 265_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT distinction_NN1 between_II meaning_NN1 and_CC significance_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO stipulative_JJ definition_NN1 ,_, and_CC so_RR to_TO make_VVI the_AT distinction_NN1 optimally_RR useful_JJ we_PPIS2 can_VM repurpose_VVI it_PPH1 by_II stipulating_VVG the_AT definition_NN1 of_IO significance_NN1 differently_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 view_NN1 of_IO theirs_PPGE is_VBZ open_JJ to_II challenge_NN1 (_( indeed_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 think_VV0 it_PPH1 is_VBZ mistaken_VVN )_) ,_, and_CC I_PPIS1 want_VV0 to_TO point_VVI out_RP that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 commitment_NN1 of_IO the_AT evidentialist_NN1 approach_NN1 to_II argument_NN1 appraisal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 to_II the_AT stability_NN1 of_IO factory_NN1 jobs_NN2 that_CST Polish_JJ immigrants_NN2 held_VVD ,_, Hispanic_JJ immigrants_NN2 have_VH0 mostly_RR had_VHN transitory_JJ and_CC temporary_JJ jobs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS "_" everything_PN1 "_" means_VVZ everything_PN1 that_CST exists_VVZ now_RT ,_, has_VHZ existed_VVN or_CC will_VM exist_VVI and_CC "_" exists_VVZ "_" means_NN exists_VVZ now_RT ,_, then_RT presentism_NN1 isn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS ,_, in_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 13_MC and_CC 1_MC1 ,_, 13_MC had_VHD the_AT factors_NN2 2_MC and_CC 6_MC ,_, North_NP1 American_JJ periodical_NN1 cicadas_NN2 would_VM not_XX have_VHI 13-year_JJ life_NN1 cycles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR the_AT Picasso_NP1 paintings_NN2 in_II question_NN1 are_VBR not_XX depictions_NN2 of_IO (_( states_NN2 of_IO affairs_NN2 involving_VVG )_) male_JJ genitals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II what_DDQ follows_VVZ ,_, we_PPIS2 examine_VV0 the_AT way_NN1 in_II which_DDQ these_DD2 three_MC recent_JJ trends_NN2 in_II the_AT philosophy_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN prompted_VVN by_II consideration_NN1 of_IO contemporary_JJ art_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 can_VM also_RR be_VBI run_VVN and_CC checked_VVN automatically_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 do_VD0 not_XX keep_VVI track_NN1 of_IO my_APPGE body_NN1 over_II time_NNT1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO retain_VVI my_APPGE bodily_JJ awareness_NN1 of_IO it_PPH1 and_CC ,_, for_IF the_AT same_DA reason_NN1 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ nothing_PN1 like_II losing_VVG track_NN1 of_IO my_APPGE body_NN1 for_IF something_PN1 like_II a_AT1 proprioceptive_JJ slip_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Levinson_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 theory_NN1 of_IO the_AT historical_JJ division_NN1 between_II art_NN1 and_CC nonart_NN1 seems_VVZ more_RGR plausible_JJ if_CS a_AT1 theory_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 leap_NN1 in_II cognitive_JJ ability_NN1 can_VM be_VBI used_VVN to_TO explain_VVI the_AT sudden_JJ emergence_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 truly_RR revolutionarily_RR new_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO artifact_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 kind_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ intended_VVN for_IF never-before_II possible_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO regard_NN1 that_CST had_VHD become_VVN possible_JJ due_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 sudden_JJ cognitive_JJ leap_NN1 that_CST heralded_VVD the_AT emergence_NN1 of_IO symbolically_RR mediated_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 have_VH0 argued_VVN that_CST the_AT privileged_JJ (_( as_CSA academics_NN2 are_VBR )_) are_VBR criticizable_JJ for_IF employing_VVG socially_RR comparative_JJ expectation_NN1 frames_VVZ narrowly_RR focused_VVN on_II their_APPGE similarly_RR privileged_JJ peers_NN2 and_CC for_IF "_" murmuring_VVG and_CC repining_VVG "_" about_II the_AT woes_NN2 local_JJ to_II the_AT privileged_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT standard_JJ philosophical_JJ account_NN1 of_IO interventionist_JJ counterfactuals_NN2 ,_, see_VV0 Woodward_NP1 (_( 2003_MC ,_, p._NNU 59-61_MCMC )_) ;_; for_IF detailed_JJ explorations_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE semantics_NN1 ,_, see_VV0 Briggs_NP1 (_( 2012a_FO )_) and_CC Santorio_NP1 (_( MS_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST emotion_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX merely_RR instrumentally_RR related_VVN to_II active_JJ engagement_NN1 with_IW the_AT environ-can_NN1 be_VBI carved_VVN up_RP into_II input_NN1 ,_, bodily_JJ reaction_NN1 ,_, and_CC subsequent_JJ cognition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Reisch_NP1 explains_VVZ ,_, "_" The_AT scientific_JJ world_NN1 conception_NN1 did_VDD not_XX need_VVI logical_JJ justification_NN1 because_CS it_PPH1 was_VBDZ already_RR ,_, as_CSA an_AT1 empirical_JJ fact_NN1 ,_, alive_JJ and_CC poised_VVN to_TO dominate_VVI modernity_NN1 "_" (_( Reisch_NP1 ,_, 378_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI a_AT1 gross_JJ misrepresentation_NN1 to_TO identify_VVI Indigenous_JJ women_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 social-reproductive_JJ labour_NN1 solely_RR as_II a_AT1 site_NN1 of_IO violence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR unlikely_JJ ever_RR to_TO produce_VVI a_AT1 society_NN1 in_II which_DDQ all_DB and_CC only_RR the_AT right_JJ attitudes_NN2 are_VBR inculcated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO "_" decide_VVI "_" whether_CSW ≥_FO ,_, we_PPIS2 place_VV0 ourselves_PPX2 in_II world_NN1 ,_, and_CC ask_VV0 which_DDQ world_NN1 is_VBZ better_JJR ,_, or_CC ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 carriage_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, in_II this_DD1 case_NN1 ,_, also_RR a_AT1 ritual_JJ vessel_NN1 ,_, and_CC not_XX merely_RR a_AT1 vehicle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT perspective_NN1 I_PPIS1 would_VM like_VVI to_TO see_VVI migration_NN1 research_NN1 adopting_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II31 account_II32 of_II33 the_AT above_JJ observations_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 may_VM rest_VVI assured_JJ ,_, that_CST the_AT question_NN1 about_II the_AT commensurability_NN1 of_IO the_AT verb_NN1 "_" to_TO be_VBI "_" with_IW the_AT Chinese_JJ language_NN1 is_VBZ probably_RR just_RR a_AT1 pseudo-question_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
She_PPHS1 therefore_RR tentatively_RR proposes_VVZ that_CST simultaneous_JJ self-witnessing_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 sort_NN1 of_IO awareness_NN1 of_IO the_AT pre-reflective_JJ (_( Nagai_NP1 1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nonetheless_RR ,_, the_AT kind_NN1 of_IO things_NN2 that_CST are_VBR feared_VVN and_CC trusted_JJ differ_VV0 and_CC this_DD1 distinction_NN1 is_VBZ brought_VVN out_RP by_II the_AT other_JJ two_MC criteria_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Discard_VV0 the_AT fearsome_JJ power_NN1 of_IO lawless_JJ execution_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Then_RT A_ZZ1 is_VBZ a_AT1 theorem_NN1 in_II S_ZZ1 with_IW the_AT assumptions_NN2 v(t1)_FO v(t2)_FO ,_, v(t3)_FO v(t4)_FO ,_, ..._... i_ZZ1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 response_II32 to_II33 these_DD2 difficulties_NN2 ,_, Carl_NP1 Cranor_NP1 (_( 1995_MC )_) has_VHZ argued_VVN that_CST the_AT social_JJ costs_NN2 of_IO relying_VVG on_II current_JJ risk-assessment_JJ procedures_NN2 (_( which_DDQ are_VBR fairly_RR accurate_JJ but_CCB very_RG slow_JJ )_) are_VBR generally_RR greater_JJR than_CSN they_PPHS2 would_VM be_VBI if_CS regulatory_JJ agencies_NN2 relied_VVN on_II less_RGR accurate_JJ but_CCB much_RR quicker_JJR methodologies_NN2 for_IF assessing_VVG risks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Otherwise_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ an_AT1 argument_NN1 that_CST can_VM easily_RR be_VBI turned_VVN toward_II pernicious_JJ ends_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fortunately_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM argue_VVI that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ indeed_RR so_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC if_CS the_AT print_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX comment_VVI on_II the_AT aesthetic_JJ character_NN1 of_IO the_AT source_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ that_CST reproductive_JJ prints_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX enable_VVI us_PPIO2 to_TO engage_VVI aesthetically_RR with_IW the_AT source_NN1 at_RR21 all_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Section_NN1 6_MC ,_, I_PPIS1 discuss_VV0 issues_NN2 of_IO stability_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 factors_NN2 explaining_VVG the_AT shortages_NN2 are_VBR undeniably_RR at_II play_NN1 :_: the_AT economic_JJ incentive_NN1 to_TO sell_VVI goods_NN2 on_II the_AT black_JJ market_NN1 or_CC through_II contraband_NN1 given_VVN the_AT wide_JJ disparity_NN1 between_II official_JJ and_CC market_VV0 prices_NN2 ;_; and_CC the_AT political_JJ motive_NN1 to_TO undermine_VVI the_AT Chavista_NP1 government_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II response_NN1 ,_, the_AT externalist_NN1 should_VM agree_VVI with_IW Pietrsoki_JJ that_CST something_PN1 has_VHZ gone_VVN wrong_JJ in_II the_AT case_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT maintenance_NN1 crew_NN1 washes_VVZ only_RR the_AT outside_II21 of_II22 the_AT bathhouse_NN1 in_II the_AT campground_NN1 where_CS 21_MC is_VBZ displayed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT 1930s_MC2 and_CC 1940s_MC2 ,_, the_AT IMP_NP1 started_VVD expanding_VVG in_II the_AT Central_JJ Valley_NN1 and_CC in_II the_AT lower-class_JJ neighborhoods_NN2 of_IO Santiago_NP1 and_CC Valparaiso_NP1 (_( Cleary_NP1 and_CC Sepúlveda_NP1 1997_MC ,_, p._NN1 100_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Is_VBZ it_PPH1 entertainment_NN1 or_CC dire_JJ political_JJ prophecy_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT paradigmatic_JJ blackness_NN1 of_IO the_AT slave_NN1 in_II Afro-pessimism_JJ acts_NN2 not_XX to_TO establish_VVI the_AT anti-blackness_NN1 of_IO white_JJ supremacy_NN1 but_CCB the_AT supposed_JJ anti-blackness_NN1 of_IO the_AT '_NULL non-Black_JJ person_NN1 of_IO colour_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Church_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 construction_NN1 provides_VVZ equivalence_NN1 classes_NN2 for_IF "_" low_JJ "_" sets_NN2 ,_, and_CC thus_RR ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO all_RR (_( low_JJ )_) ordinals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reply_VV0 :_: I_PPIS1 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 think_VV0 Goldman_NP1 makes_VVZ this_DD1 claim_NN1 or_CC is_VBZ otherwise_RR committed_VVN to_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 view_II32 of_II33 these_DD2 data_NN ,_, the_AT conclusions_NN2 drawn_VVN by_II Robinson_NP1 that_DD1 '_NULL local_JJ and_CC national_JJ capitalists_NN2 '_NULL must_VM '_NULL delocalise_VVI '_NULL and_CC link_VVI to_II transnational_JJ capital_NN1 '_NULL if_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR to_TO survive_VVI '_NULL and_CC that_DD1 '_NULL local_JJ capitalists_NN2 '_NULL are_VBR simply_RR '_NULL swept_VVN up_RP into_II the_AT process_NN1 of_IO transnational_JJ class_NN1 formation_NN1 '_NULL can_VM be_VBI challenged_VVN in_II31 respect_II32 of_II33 Australia_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Seeing_VVG distress_NN1 on_II the_AT face_NN1 of_IO another_DD1 often_RR evokes_VVZ sympathy_NN1 in_II others_NN2 (_( Eisenberg_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1989_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Over_II the_AT last_MD half-century_NNT1 ,_, proletarianisation_NN1 of_IO the_AT vast_JJ majority_NN1 of_IO the_AT remaining_JJ global_JJ peasantry_NN1 has_VHZ accompanied_VVN a_AT1 global_JJ expansion_NN1 of_IO mostly_RR service-sector_JJ jobs_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ accounted_VVD for_IF more_DAR than_CSN half_DB of_IO global_JJ employment_NN1 growth_NN1 in_II 2013_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT fourth_MD paper_NN1 by_II da_NP1 Silva_NP1 also_RR explores_VVZ visual_JJ hallucinations_NN2 ,_, in_II this_DD1 case_NN1 those_DD2 had_VHD by_II normal_JJ and_CC Parkinson_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 disease_NN1 populations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Once_RR these_DD2 details_NN2 are_VBR in_II place_NN1 ,_, the_AT proof_NN1 that_CST Vx_NP1 (_( J_ZZ1 (_( x_ZZ1 )_) J(x+1)_FO )_) can_VM be_VBI formalized_VVN in_II PA_NN1 in_II essentially_RR the_AT same_DA manner_NN1 as_CSA the_AT proof_NN1 of_IO Vx_NP1 (_( K_ZZ1 (_( x_ZZ1 )_) K(x+1)_FO )_) in_II CT_NN1 -_- i.e._REX ,_, one_PN1 simply_RR considers_VVZ the_AT rules_NN2 of_IO the_AT relevant_JJ proof_NN1 systems_NN2 and_CC then_RT uses_VVZ the_AT compositional_JJ clauses_NN2 for_IF Tk_NP1 (_( x_ZZ1 )_) and_CC Tr(x)_NP1 (_( which_DDQ are_VBR respectively_RR derivable_JJ in_II PA_NN1 and_CC assumed_VVN in_II CT_NN1 )_) to_TO show_VVI that_CST if_CS the_AT premises_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 rule_NN1 fall_NN1 under_II the_AT relevant_JJ predicate_NN1 ,_, then_RT so_RR does_VDZ its_APPGE conclusion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC in_II the_AT case_NN1 in_II which_DDQ he_PPHS1 continues_VVZ to_TO pour_VVI effort_NN1 into_II a_AT1 strategy_NN1 he_PPHS1 has_VHZ already_RR decided_VVN is_VBZ not_XX going_VVG to_II work_NN1 ,_, the_AT effort_NN1 is_VBZ wasted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 us_PPIO2 think_VVI of_IO this_DD1 as_II the_AT problem_NN1 of_IO inadvertent_JJ expression_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS perdurantism_NN1 meets_VVZ the_AT condition_NN1 of_IO adequacy_NN1 associated_VVN with_IW the_AT simpliciter_NN1 intuition_NN1 while_CS the_AT relational_JJ ,_, adverbial_JJ ,_, and_CC neo-Aristotelian_JJ theories_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX ,_, the_AT former_DA wins_VVZ out_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, it_PPH1 depends_VVZ upon_II whether_CSW31 or_CSW32 not_CSW33 she_PPHS1 is_VBZ dominated_VVN (_( Pettit_NP1 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 African_JJ American_JJ lecturer_NN1 at_II a_AT1 local_JJ college_NN1 and_CC attendee_NN1 of_IO the_AT Southern_JJ Baptist_JJ church_NN1 adds_VVZ ,_, Having_VHG an_AT1 explicit_JJ representation_NN1 of_IO legal_JJ states_NN2 is_VBZ useful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT first_MD ,_, reasonableness_NN1 admits_VVZ of_IO degrees_NN2 in_II a_AT1 positive_JJ direction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_II31 regard_II32 to_II33 Ru_NP1 cultural_JJ tradition_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 should_VM focus_VVI on_II the_AT spirit_NN1 ,_, and_CC not_XX simply_RR on_II the_AT imitation_NN1 of_IO ancient_JJ ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 article_NN1 offers_VVZ a_AT1 comprehensive_JJ review_NN1 of_IO literature_NN1 examining_VVG the_AT antecedents_NN2 and_CC outcomes_NN2 of_IO ethical_JJ climates_NN2 over_II the_AT last_MD decade_NNT1 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 moderators_NN2 of_IO the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II ethical_JJ climates_NN2 and_CC other_JJ variables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Other_JJ scales_NN2 which_DDQ have_VH0 been_VBN used_VVN in_II multiple_JJ studies_NN2 include_VV0 the_AT Schminke_NP1 ,_, Ambrose_NP1 ,_, and_CC Neubaum_NP1 (_( 2005_MC )_) 16item_FO scale_NN1 which_DDQ captures_VVZ self_NN1 and_CC otherfocused_JJ reasoning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA an_AT1 explanation_NN1 identifies_VVZ a_AT1 specific_JJ difference_NN1 between_II the_AT reals_NN2 and_CC rationals_VVZ that_CST is_VBZ responsible_JJ for_IF their_APPGE difference_NN1 with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 the_AT proof_NN1 idea_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 success_NN1 in_II proving_VVG an_AT1 IVT-type_JJ theorem_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Elsewhere_RL ,_, I_PPIS1 approach_VV0 the_AT matter_NN1 rather_RR from_II the_AT perspective_NN1 of_IO the_AT problems_NN2 that_CST Marx_NP1 was_VBDZ aware_JJ of_IO in_II the_AT 1864/_FO 65_MC manuscript_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 am_VBM not_XX under_RG promissory_JJ obligation_NN1 to_II you_PPY to_TO mow_VVI your_APPGE lawn_NN1 today_RT even_CS21 if_CS22 my_APPGE child_NN1 needs_VVZ to_TO be_VBI driven_VVN to_II the_AT hospital_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, he_PPHS1 suggested_VVD a_AT1 relatively_RR long_JJ process_NN1 of_IO learning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Often_RR ,_, this_DD1 line_NN1 of_IO thought_NN1 is_VBZ further_RRR substantiated_VVN by_II causal_JJ considerations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE approach_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 plea_NN1 for_IF the_AT incorporation_NN1 of_IO well-known_JJ mathematical_JJ procedures_NN2 in_II the_AT standard_JJ toolkit_NN1 of_IO the_AT logician_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR one_PN1 might_VM well_RR want_VVI to_TO say_VVI that_DD1 ,_, in_II some_DD sense_NN1 ,_, the_AT English_JJ names_NN2 '_NULL Superman_NP1 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL Clark_NP1 Kent_NP1 '_NULL represent_VV0 the_AT same_DA thing_NN1 (_( in_II a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST '_NULL Superman_NP1 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL Darth_NP1 Vader_NP1 '_NULL do_VD0 not_XX )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Adaptation_NN1 to_II inverted_JJ faces_NN2 ,_, or_CC to_II inverted_JJ Tshapes_NN2 ,_, operates_VVZ about_RP as_RR21 well_RR22 on_II subsequent_JJ view_NN1 of_IO the_AT different_JJ stimulus_NN1 type_NN1 (_( Face_VV0 to_II '_NULL T_ZZ1 '_NULL or_CC '_NULL T_ZZ1 '_NULL to_II Face_NN1 )_) as_CSA it_PPH1 does_VDZ within_II stimulus_NN1 type_NN1 (_( Face_NN1 to_II Face_NN1 or_CC '_NULL T_ZZ1 '_NULL to_II '_NULL T_ZZ1 '_NULL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Average_JJ sentence_NN1 length_NN1 LL_NP1 goes_VVZ from_II a_AT1 low_JJ of_IO 14.8_MC (_( Finnish_JJ )_) up_RG21 to_RG22 34.5_MC (_( Serbian_JJ )_) ,_, and_CC in_RR21 general_RR22 the_AT variance_NN1 L_ZZ1 exceeds_VVZ the_AT mean_JJ length_NN1 LL_NP1 ,_, indicating_VVG a_AT1 heavy_JJ tail_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB the_AT proof_NN1 theory_NN1 of_IO logics_NN2 based_VVN on_II this_DD1 trilattice_NN1 is_VBZ another_DD1 matter_NN1 (_( see_VV0 also_RR Odintsov_NP1 &;_NULL Wansing_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 section_NN1 1.2_MC on_II '_NULL the_AT axiomatization_NN1 problem_NN1 '_NULL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 see_VVI then_RT how_RRQ this_DD1 leads_VVZ to_II anti-Humeanism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 should_VM be_VBI clear_JJ that_CST all_DB this_DD1 talk_NN1 has_VHZ nothing_PN1 to_TO do_VDI with_IW the_AT '_NULL blows_NN2 inflicted_VVD '_NULL ,_, with_IW '_NULL atonement_NN1 '_NULL ,_, etc._RA ,_, but_CCB that_DD1 its_APPGE only_JJ purpose_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO demonstrate_VVI that_DD1 tension_NN1 of_IO revolutionary_JJ feeling_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ expressed_VVN in_II the_AT assassination_NN1 attempts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ unclear_JJ to_II me_PPIO1 just_RR what_DDQ justification_NN1 he_PPHS1 has_VHZ for_IF making_VVG this_DD1 a_AT1 starting_NN1 point_NN1 in_II an_AT1 art_NN1 lineage_NN1 or_CC for_IF discounting_VVG it_PPH1 as_CSA art_NN1 proper_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, RM_NP1 is_VBZ able_JK to_TO do_VDI more_DAR than_CSN merely_RR categorize_VV0 the_AT letters_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Then_RT ,_, in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO determine_VVI which_DDQ model_NN1 provided_CS the_AT best_JJT fit_JJ for_IF each_DD1 participant_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 compared_VVD the_AT posterior_JJ likelihoods_NN2 of_IO each_DD1 participant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 choice_JJ behaviour_NN1 according_II21 to_II22 each_DD1 model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB they_PPHS2 have_VH0 difficulty_NN1 defining_VVG or_CC communicating_NN1 what_DDQ they_PPHS2 mean_VV0 by_II spiritual_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT first_MD case_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR done_VDN ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 fundamental_JJ ambiguities_NN2 in_II the_AT ISA_NP1 essay_NN1 remained_VVD to_TO be_VBI resolved_VVN is_VBZ undeniable_JJ ,_, as_CSA becomes_VVZ apparent_JJ when_CS the_AT published_JJ version_NN1 is_VBZ set_VVN alongside_II the_AT posthumously_RR published_VVN ,_, fuller_JJR version_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, watching_VVG a_AT1 sexual_JJ video_NN1 with_IW another_DD1 person_NN1 ,_, allowing_VVG another_DD1 person_NN1 to_TO release_VVI sexual_JJ footage_NN1 (_( either_RR to_II the_AT public_NN1 or_CC to_II specific_JJ individuals_NN2 )_) that_CST documents_VVZ one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 sexual_JJ acts_NN2 ,_, recounting_VVG a_AT1 traumatic_JJ sexual_JJ memory_NN1 ,_, the_AT act_NN1 of_IO sitting_VVG proximally_RR and_CC watching_VVG another_DD1 person_NN1 perform_VVI a_AT1 sexual_JJ act-these_DD2 are_VBR examples_NN2 of_IO promissory_JJ content_NN1 that_CST certainly_RR render_VV0 a_AT1 promise_NN1 over_II extensive_JJ for_IF qualitative_JJ reasons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_PN1 might_VM be_VBI pragmatically_RR inconsistent_JJ on_II the_AT externalist_NN1 approach_NN1 but_CCB have_VH0 no_AT idea_NN1 that_CST she_PPHS1 is_VBZ pragmatically_RR inconsistent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, quite_RG often_RR ,_, such_DA acknowledgments_NN2 absolve_VV0 those_DD2 thanked_VVN of_IO any_DD responsibility_NN1 for_IF the_AT text_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II modern_JJ times_NNT2 ,_, China_NP1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 part_NN1 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 capitalist_NN1 system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, much_DA1 of_IO the_AT preference_NN1 for_IF qualitative_JJ analysis_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI due_II21 to_II22 an_AT1 emphasis_NN1 on_II studying_VVG the_AT "_" context_NN1 of_IO lived_VVN experience_NN1 "_" of_IO members_NN2 of_IO some_DD marginalized_JJ group_NN1 (_( Jordan-Zachery_NP1 2007_MC ,_, 261_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR the_AT patterns_NN2 by_II which_DDQ we_PPIS2 attribute_VV0 responsibility_NN1 are_VBR not_XX written_VVN into_II our_APPGE psychologies_NN2 alone_RR ,_, but_CCB reflect_VV0 our_APPGE judgments_NN2 about_II people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 rights_NN2 and_CC obligations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS I_PPIS1 am_VBM sitting_VVG in_II a_AT1 chair_NN1 and_CC having_VHG no_AT pleasant_JJ or_CC painful_JJ experiences_NN2 ,_, I_PPIS1 have_VH0 a_AT1 well-being_NN1 level_NN1 of_IO zero_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 intensional_JJ operator_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 operator_NN1 within_II which_DDQ materially_RR equivalent_JJ propositions_NN2 are_VBR not_XX intersubstitutable_JJ salve_NN1 veritate_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB of_IO these_DD2 phenomena_NN2 of_IO extreme_JJ violence_NN1 and_CC genocidal_JJ destruction_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN the_AT subject_NN1 of_IO intense_JJ historical_JJ research_NN1 ;_; Tooze_NP1 allows_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO grasp_VVI them_PPHO2 analytically_RR by_II integrating_VVG them_PPHO2 into_II the_AT larger_JJR structure_NN1 of_IO the_AT Nazi_JJ economy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Between_II Aranyosi_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 and_CC Philipps_VVZ '_NULL papers_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 see_VV0 a_AT1 new_JJ focusing_VVG on_II '_NULL null_JJ '_NULL experiences_NN2 which_DDQ may_VM indicate_VVI a_AT1 fruitful_JJ new_JJ route_NN1 emerging_VVG in_II the_AT quest_NN1 to_TO understand_VVI hallucinations_NN2 ,_, especially_RR given_VVN the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO pure_JJ or_CC complete_JJ hallucinations_NN2 (_( hallucinations_NN2 that_CST involve_VV0 no_AT veridically_RR experienced_JJ objects_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR specifically_RR ,_, individuals_NN2 '_NULL religious_JJ affiliation_NN1 will_VM benefit_VVI their_APPGE psychological_JJ well-being_NN1 when_CS they_PPHS2 successfully_RR internalize_VV0 positive_JJ attributes_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE religious_JJ community_NN1 ,_, thereby_RR allowing_VVG them_PPHO2 to_TO share_VVI in_II the_AT group_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 collective_JJ self-esteem_NN1 (_( Crocker_NP1 and_CC Luhtanen_NP1 1990_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Now_RT let_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 add_VVI to_II our_APPGE worldmaking_JJ language_NN1 a_AT1 predicate-negation_JJ symbol_NN1 NEG_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD was_VBDZ a_AT1 collection_NN1 of_IO articles_NN2 by_II Nicolas_NP1 Krasso_NP1 ,_, Ernest_NP1 Mandel_NP1 and_CC Monty_NP1 Johnstone_NP1 ,_, originally_RR published_VVN in_II New_JJ Left_JJ Review_NN1 in_II 1967-9_MCMC ,_, issued_VVN under_II the_AT title_NN1 El_NP1 marxismo_NN1 de_NP1 Trotsky_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II turn_NN1 ,_, she_PPHS1 argues_VVZ that_CST '_NULL internal_JJ jurisdictional_JJ conflicts_NN2 play_VV0 a_AT1 much_RR stronger_JJR role_NN1 in_II determining_JJ concepts_NN2 of_IO sovereignty_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Findings_NN2 indicate_VV0 twin_NN1 tensions_NN2 of_IO community_NN1 ,_, with_IW in-group_JJ solidarity_NN1 experienced_VVD more_RGR intensely_RR as_CSA each_DD1 group_NN1 expresses_VVZ their_APPGE out-group_NN1 divisions_NN2 ,_, conflict_NN1 ,_, and_CC hostilities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT white_NN1 must_VM challenge_VVI her_APPGE racism_NN1 ,_, but_CCB the_AT Native_JJ American_JJ ,_, Arab_NN1 ,_, Asian_JJ or_CC Latino_NN1 must_VM root_VVI out_RP the_AT anti-blackness_NN1 which_DDQ is_VBZ surely_RR inscribed_VVN in_II the_AT shadiest_JJT corners_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE mind_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC indeed_RR ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 Davidson_NP1 himself_PPX1 seldom_RR acknowledges_VVZ this_DD1 explicitly_RR ,_, it_PPH1 has_VHZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 had_VHD to_TO learn_VVI about_II the_AT payoffs_NN2 associated_VVN with_IW the_AT visual_JJ stimuli_NN2 so_BCL21 as_BCL22 to_TO maximize_VVI their_APPGE final_JJ monetary_JJ winning_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX will_VM always_RR be_VBI an_AT1 inexhaustible_JJ supply_NN1 of_IO such_DA little_JJ conundrums_NN2 to_TO worry_VVI the_AT defenders_NN2 of_IO any_DD account_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 concept_NN1 as_RG vast_JJ as_CSA that_DD1 of_IO health_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS there_EX are_VBR no_RR21 longer_RR22 slaves_NN2 ,_, there_EX are_VBR no_RR21 longer_RR22 masters_NN2 ...._... 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Higgs_NP1 mechanism_NN1 circumvents_VVZ this_DD1 issue_NN1 by_II postulating_VVG the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO external_JJ fields_NN2 whose_DDQGE VEV_NP1 break_VV0 spontaneously_RR the_AT local_JJ gauge_NN1 symmetries_NN2 :_: Nomological_JJ sufficiency_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, one_PN1 can_VM find_VVI more_RGR sophisticated_JJ cultural_JJ productions_NN2 offering_VVG more_RGR solid_JJ and_CC critical_JJ takes_VVZ on_RP the_AT social_JJ realities_NN2 of_IO migration_NN1 than_CSN the_AT films_NN2 of_IO Fatih_NP1 Akin_JJ or_CC the_AT Bukovina_NP1 Club_NN1 of_IO Stefan_NP1 Hantel_NP1 alias_II Shantel_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT aim_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 essay_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO argue_VVI that_DD1 ,_, if_CS a_AT1 robust_JJ form_NN1 of_IO moral_JJ realism_NN1 is_VBZ true_JJ ,_, then_RT moral_JJ vagueness_NN1 is_VBZ ontic_JJ vagueness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO attend_VVI to_II chapter_NN1 38_MC for_IF another_DD1 reason-it_PPH1 seems_VVZ to_TO invalidate_VVI the_AT reading_NN1 of_IO si_FW yu_NNU as_II "_" self-oriented_JJ desires_NN2 ,_, "_" as_CSA in_II Chan_NP1 and_CC Ivanhoe_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 readings_NN2 of_IO the_AT Laozi_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, as_CSA Ryan_NP1 ,_, Buchholtz_NP1 ,_, and_CC Kolb_NP1 (_( 2010_MC ,_, 686_MC )_) notes_NN2 ,_, complex_JJ financial_JJ markets_NN2 have_VH0 a_AT1 bigger_JJR problem_NN1 with_IW information_NN1 asymmetry_NN1 than_CSN other_JJ markets_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO whether_CSW the_AT act_NN1 is_VBZ of_IO "_" propriety_NN1 ,_, "_" or_CC appropriate_JJ for_IF the_AT situation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alongside_II the_AT narrative_NN1 of_IO Marx_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 relationship_NN1 with_IW Gertrude_NP1 Kugelmann_NP1 ,_, we_PPIS2 learn_VV0 of_IO the_AT vital_JJ role_NN1 his_APPGE daughters_NN2 played_VVN in_II the_AT composition_NN1 of_IO Capital_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT most_RGT plausible_JJ candidates_NN2 I_PPIS1 am_VBM able_JK to_TO think_VVI of_IO are_VBR -_- unsurprisingly_RR -_- bodily_JJ sensations_NN2 and_CC bodily_JJ feelings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Vincent_NP1 Goossaert_NP1 and_CC David_NP1 Palmer_NP1 (_( 2011_MC )_) argue_VV0 that_CST when_CS researching_VVG religious_JJ life_NN1 in_II the_AT contemporary_JJ People_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 Republic_NN1 of_IO China_NP1 ,_, two_MC factors_NN2 need_VV0 to_TO be_VBI taken_VVN into_II account_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT task_NN1 of_IO portraying_VVG the_AT logical_JJ structure_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 certain_JJ type_NN1 of_IO argument_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO following_VVG our_APPGE intuitions_NN2 about_II what_DDQ is_VBZ structurally_RR going_VVG on_RP in_II such_DA arguments_NN2 ,_, then_RT we_PPIS2 will_VM have_VHI nothing_PN1 ,_, apart_II21 from_II22 our_APPGE confronted_VVD intuitions_NN2 ,_, to_TO appeal_VVI to_TO in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO grant_VVI our_APPGE claims_NN2 that_CST these_DD2 arguments_NN2 have/haven_FU '_NULL t_ZZ1 a_AT1 deductive_JJ structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Jean-Paul_NP1 Sartre_NP1 ,_, in_II L_ZZ1 '_NULL lmaginaire_NN1 (_( 1940_MC )_) ,_, insists_VVZ that_CST in_II looking_VVG at_II a_AT1 portrait_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE friend_NN1 Pierre_NP1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ Pierre_NP1 himself_PPX1 that_CST appears_VVZ to_II him_PPHO1 ,_, and_CC not_XX something_PN1 else_RR in_II31 lieu_II32 of_II33 Pierre_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 concur_VV0 with_IW commentators_NN2 and_CC translators_NN2 who_PNQS see_VV0 in_II Analects_NP1 3.16_MC a_AT1 metaphor_NN1 for_IF benevolent_JJ rule_NN1 ,_, or_CC renzheng_NN1 ,_, as_II31 opposed_II32 to_II33 rule_NN1 by_II force_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM ,_, rather_RG unfairly_RR ,_, pick_VV0 upon_II two_MC philosophers_NN2 of_IO religion_NN1 as_CSA archetypes_NN2 of_IO the_AT worst_JJT examples_NN2 of_IO Ivan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 misuse_NN1 and_CC misinterpretation_NN1 ,_, before_II proceeding_VVG to_II a_AT1 third_MD example_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ less_RGR misguided_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Huang_VV0 Shisan_NP1 ,_, in_II his_APPGE Postscript_NP1 to_II the_AT Analects_NP1 (_( Lunyu_NP1 hou_NN1 '_NULL an_AT1 )_) ,_, explained_VVD that_CST the_AT ancients_NN2 regarded_VVN disobedience_NN1 as_II violating_VVG the_AT rites_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ;_; just_RR one_MC1 more_DAR '_NULL friendly_JJ amendment_NN1 '_NULL :_: we_PPIS2 also_RR see_VV0 in_II Gramsci_NP1 the_AT courage_NN1 to_TO cancel_VVI those_DD2 elements_NN2 of_IO Marxism_NN1 no_RR21 longer_RR22 suitable_JJ to_II the_AT creation_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 egalitarian_NN1 and_CC democratic_JJ world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consider_VV0 Yogi_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 being_NN1 F_ZZ1 at_II arbitrary_JJ time_NNT1 t_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA our_APPGE vocabulary_NN1 can_VM be_VBI what_DDQ we_PPIS2 can_VM like_VVI ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM add_VVI to_II our_APPGE vocabulary_NN1 of_IO discourse_NN1 moves_VVZ descriptions_NN2 of_IO non-linguistic_JJ actions_NN2 or_CC states_NN2 ,_, like_II player_NN1 1_MC1 buys_VVZ the_AT goods_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ a_AT1 move_NN1 that_CST Player_NN1 1_MC1 might_VM make_VVI at_II the_AT close_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 negotiation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Yu_NP1 pian_NN1 (_( )_) ,_, fu_NN1 (_( )_) section_NN1 ,_, yin1_FO is_VBZ paraphrased_VVN as_CSA unseen_JJ and_CC concealed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Failing_VVG to_TO recognise_VVI this_DD1 results_VVZ in_II weaker_JJR analysis_NN1 and_CC detracts_VVZ from_II the_AT appeal_NN1 of_IO historical_JJ materialism_NN1 to_II many_DA2 anti-racists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 case_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 difficult_JJ to_TO see_VVI how_RRQ they_PPHS2 could_VM even_RR disagree_VVI about_II whether_CSW P_ZZ1 was_VBDZ within_II R_ZZ1 if_CS they_PPHS2 didn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 hold_VV0 competing_JJ fundamental_JJ frameworks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW a_AT1 slightly_RR stronger_JJR damping_NN1 of_IO b_ZZ1 =_FO 0.9_MC only_RR one_MC1 is_VBZ still_RR winning_VVG (_( again_RT the_AT same_DA as_CSA above_RL )_) ,_, and_CC for_IF b_ZZ1 =_FO 0.8_MC all_DB punters_NN2 are_VBR either_RR losing_VVG or_CC not_XX playing_VVG at_RR21 all_RR22 (_( because_CS no_AT bets_NN2 in_II their_APPGE range_NN1 are_VBR on_II offer_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT effect_NN1 the_AT cause_NN1 was_VBDZ somehow_RR degenerated_VVN :_: this_DD1 is_VBZ indicated_VVN ?_? 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 thus_RR have_VH0 an_AT1 -action_NN1 C×S_FO →_NULL CC×S_FO →_NULL C._ZZ1 Now_RT ,_, the_AT ?_? rst_NNU subcase_NN1 is_VBZ immediate_JJ since_CS trivially_RR L_ZZ1 (_( B_ZZ1 )_) ?_? 
</s>
<s>
If_CS this_DD1 is_VBZ true_JJ ,_, then_RT a_AT1 layer_NN1 has_VHZ melted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT theorist_NN1 of_IO Bayesian_JJ Uniqueness_NN1 may_VM wish_VVI to_TO allow_VVI for_IF it_PPH1 to_TO be_VBI rational_JJ to_TO assign_VVI probability_NN1 less_RRR than_CSN 1_MC1 to_II some_DD a_JJ21 priori_JJ22 truths_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, complex_JJ mathematical_JJ truths_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 Goldbach_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 conjecture_NN1 or_CC its_APPGE negation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Studies_NN2 of_IO the_AT growth_NN1 and_CC decline_NN1 of_IO religious_JJ organizations_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO focus_VVI on_II the_AT ability_NN1 of_IO American_JJ religious_JJ institutions_NN2 to_TO adapt_VVI within_II an_AT1 open_JJ market_NN1 system_NN1 ,_, but_CCB theories_NN2 of_IO adaptation_NN1 may_VM overstate_VVI the_AT ability_NN1 of_IO organizations_NN2 to_TO respond_VVI to_II changes_NN2 in_II their_APPGE environment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
During_II the_AT trial_NN1 ,_, experts_NN2 from_II different_JJ social_JJ sciences_NN2 were_VBDR summoned_VVN by_II the_AT parties_NN2 to_TO testify_VVI whether_CSW statements_NN2 by_II the_AT seven_MC defendants_NN2 could_VM have_VHI determined_VVN the_AT behavior_NN1 of_IO some_DD inhabitants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX clear_JJ that_CST one_PN1 can_VM justifiably_RR ignore_VVI quantum_NN1 (_( and_CC other_JJ strange_JJ but_CCB possible_JJ )_) events_NN2 once_CS they_PPHS2 have_VH0 been_VBN introduced_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT placement_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 passage_NN1 toward_II the_AT conclusion_NN1 of_IO Part_NN1 I_PPIS1 indicates_VVZ the_AT two-sided_JJ relation_NN1 of_IO the_AT historical_JJ religions_NN2 to_II the_AT problem_NN1 of_IO radical_JJ evil_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Then_RT :_: (_( 1_MC1 )_) It_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX hold_VVI in_RR21 general_RR22 that_CST if_CS °°_FO satisfies_VVZ regularity_NN1 then_RT it_PPH1 satisfies_VVZ reciprocity_NN1 ,_, and_CC (_( 2_MC )_) it_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX hold_VVI in_RR21 general_RR22 that_CST if_CS °°_FO satisfies_VVZ reciprocity_NN1 then_RT it_PPH1 satisfies_VVZ regularity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Peter_NP1 Linebaugh_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Stop_VV0 ,_, Thief_NN1 !_! aims_VVZ to_TO '_NULL join_VVI the_AT alarm_NN1 against_II neoliberalism_NN1 '_NULL by_II invoking_VVG the_AT bloody_JJ history_NN1 of_IO enclosure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Upon_II discovering_VVG in_II it_PPH1 the_AT creative_JJ hand_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 woman_NN1 that_CST resulted_VVD in_II reattributing_VVG the_AT painting_NN1 to_II Constance-Marie_NP1 Blondelu_NP1 Charpentier_NP1 ,_, who_PNQS studied_VVD with_IW and_CC exhibited_VVN alongside_II David_NP1 ,_, the_AT artwork_NN1 precipitously_RR fell_VVD in_II value_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Taylor_NP1 reports_VVZ how_RRQ Dawkins_NP1 contends_VVZ that_DD1 faith_NN1 ,_, defined_VVN as_CSA "_" '_NULL belief_NN1 that_CST isn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 based_VVN on_II evidence_NN1 "_" '_NULL ,_, is_VBZ "_" '_NULL one_MC1 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 great_JJ evils_NN2 ,_, comparable_JJ to_II the_AT smallpox_NN virus_NN1 but_CCB harder_RRR to_TO eradicate_VVI "_" '_NULL (_( McGrath_NP1 2004_MC ,_, p._NN1 95_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO realise_VVI its_APPGE value_NN1 ,_, she_PPHS1 enters_VVZ into_II the_AT surrogacy_NN1 contract_NN1 as_II the_AT proprietor_NN1 of_IO her_APPGE own_DA reproductive_JJ capacity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, we_PPIS2 might_VM argue_VVI that_CST there_EX are_VBR a_JJ21 priori_JJ22 constraints_NN2 on_II the_AT kind_NN1 of_IO thing_NN1 that_CST could_VM give_VVI rise_NN1 to_II a_AT1 change-_NN1 for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, that_CST it_PPH1 must_VM be_VBI another_DD1 change_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Tonight_RT ,_, Texas_NP1 ,_, I_ZZ1 '_NULL m_ZZ1 talking_VVG about_II a_AT1 war_NN1 for_IF your_APPGE souls_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 should_VM accept_VVI as_II an_AT1 important_JJ mission_NN1 the_AT role_NN1 of_IO comparative_JJ philosophy_NN1 in_II identifying_VVG cultural_JJ patterns_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, too_RG much_DA1 violence_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 threat_NN1 to_II civilization_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II these_DD2 views_NN2 then_RT ,_, there_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 initial_JJ layer_NN1 of_IO processing_NN1 which_DDQ outputs_VVZ a_AT1 series_NN of_IO representations_NN2 that_CST underwrite_VV0 experiences_NN2 of_IO "_" static_JJ "_" properties_NN2 like_II shape_NN1 ,_, color_NN1 ,_, texture_NN1 and_CC illumination_NN1 ,_, and_CC whose_DDQGE temporal_JJ relations_NN2 realize_VV0 the_AT temporal_JJ content_NN1 of_IO experience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD of_IO these_DD2 means_NN we_PPIS2 have_VH0 <T>_FO for_IF every_AT1 P(A)_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 for_IF this_DD1 definition_NN1 to_TO be_VBI useful_JJ we_PPIS2 need_VV0 some_DD informative_JJ characterization_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 '_NULL necessity_NN1 operator_NN1 '_NULL ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 we_PPIS2 may_VM identify_VVI the_AT range_NN1 of_IO 3_MC in_II (_( *_FU )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 might_VM concede_VVI ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX as_CS21 though_CS22 the_AT laws_NN2 of_IO nature_NN1 must_VM be_VBI completely_RR understood_VVN before_CS we_PPIS2 may_VM wonder_VVI what_DDQ metaphysical_JJ structures_NN2 would_VM best_RRT fit_VVI our_APPGE evidence_NN1 as_CSA it_PPH1 stands_VVZ ,_, including_II the_AT more_DAR pedestrian_NN1 observations_NN2 that_CST lead_VV0 to_II the_AT more_RGR rigorous_JJ and_CC more_RGR general_JJ laws_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II such_DA ,_, tonic_NN1 immobility_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 deliberate_JJ trick_NN1 or_CC response_NN1 on_II31 behalf_II32 of_II33 the_AT agent_NN1 with_IW the_AT aim_NN1 of_IO survival_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS contractualism_NN1 can_VM not_XX provide_VVI that_DD1 balance_NN1 ,_, then_RT we_PPIS2 must_VM look_VVI elsewhere_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 intellectuals_NN2 thus_RR formed_VVN a_AT1 misleading_JJ ,_, Althusser-inflected_JJ impression_NN1 of_IO Gramsci_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 work_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ physically_RR necessary_JJ that_CST the_AT gravitational_JJ constant_JJ isn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 stronger_JJR or_CC weaker_JJR than_CSN what_DDQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA exchanges_NN2 merely_RR amount_NN1 to_II games_NN2 of_IO burden-shifting_JJ tennis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 purely_RR natural-scientific_JJ rationalism_NN1 could_VM never_RR grasp_VVI what_DDQ is_VBZ politically_RR at_II issue_NN1 ,_, namely_REX ,_, the_AT concrete_JJ situation_NN1 and_CC the_AT concrete_JJ moment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 brief_RR22 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 them_PPHO2 ,_, the_AT intensity_NN1 ,_, unity_NN1 ,_, and_CC completeness_NN1 of_IO artworks_NN2 cause_VV0 the_AT aesthetic_JJ experiences_NN2 of_IO symmetry_NN1 ,_, unity_NN1 ,_, and_CC completeness_NN1 in_II different_JJ persons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT class_NN1 of_IO logics_NN2 I_PPIS1 want_VV0 to_TO consider_VVI are_VBR those_DD2 for_IF which_DDQ have_VH0 an_AT1 indexical_JJ semantics_NN1 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, a_AT1 model_NN1 theory_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT truth-value_NN1 of_IO formulas_NN2 is_VBZ evaluated_VVN relative_II21 to_II22 points_NN2 in_II the_AT model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS the_AT former_DA have_VH0 an_AT1 SR_NN1 probability_NN1 of.5_FO to_TO land_VVI heads_NN2 ,_, the_AT biased_JJ coins_NN2 are_VBR stipulated_VVN to_TO have_VHI a_AT1 well-defined_JJ SR_NN1 probability_NN1 of_IO landing_VVG heads_NN2 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ different_JJ from.5_FO ,_, say_VV0 ,_, .53_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Adorno_NN1 garners_NN2 a_AT1 moment_NN1 in_II this_DD1 narrative_NN1 for_IF theorising_VVG an_AT1 antagonistic_JJ totality_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT '_NULL scum_NN1 of_IO the_AT concept_NN1 '_NULL ,_, what_DDQ is_VBZ non-identical_JJ ,_, or_CC the_AT abject_JJ can_VM never_RR be_VBI fully_RR integrated_VVN into_II a_AT1 logical_JJ scheme_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, Piketty_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 r_ZZ1 is_VBZ not_XX some_DD theoretical_JJ construct_NN1 derived_VVN from_II the_AT rational_JJ behaviour_NN1 of_IO economic_JJ agents_NN2 ,_, but_CCB based_VVN on_II his_APPGE interpretation_NN1 of_IO historical_JJ data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ precisely_RR the_AT pop_NN1 culture_NN1 lightness_NN1 and_CC the_AT self-aware_JJ irony_NN1 with_IW which_DDQ such_DA productions_NN2 deconstruct_VV0 the_AT excesses_NN2 of_IO multiculturalism_NN1 that_CST means_VVZ they_PPHS2 make_VV0 a_AT1 more_RGR successful_JJ contribution_NN1 to_II slowly_RR but_CCB surely_RR changing_VVG the_AT image_NN1 of_IO migration_NN1 in_II society_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Exactly_RR what_DDQ is_VBZ to_TO count_VVI as_II a_AT1 substantive_JJ assumption_NN1 is_VBZ undoubtedly_RR vague_JJ ,_, but_CCB as_II a_AT1 rough_JJ gloss_NN1 we_PPIS2 can_VM say_VVI that_CST a_AT1 substantive_JJ assumption_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 thesis_NN1 concerning_II the_AT subject_NN1 matter_NN1 at_II hand_NN1 (_( arithmetic_NN1 or_CC set_VV0 theory_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 )_) that_CST can_VM make_VVI for_IF significant_JJ mathematical_JJ or_CC philosophical_JJ disagreement_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS Julieta_NP1 monitors_VVZ the_AT cleaning_NN1 of_IO wastewater_NN1 ,_, multiple_JJ hybrids_NN2 are_VBR produced_VVN as_CSA she_PPHS1 interacts_VVZ with_IW workers_NN2 ,_, chemical_JJ and_CC mechanical_JJ processes_NN2 ,_, errors_NN2 ,_, clashing_VVG claims_NN2 of_IO farmers_NN2 and_CC neighbors_NN2 ,_, and_CC other_JJ obstacles_NN2 to_II urban_JJ planning_NN1 and_CC development_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR during_II the_AT last_MD two_MC decades_NNT2 ,_, many_DA2 studies_NN2 of_IO the_AT Moscow_NP1 Executive_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 relationship_NN1 with_IW individual_JJ parties_NN2 have_VH0 demonstrated_VVN a_AT1 greater_JJR degree_NN1 of_IO national_JJ autonomy_NN1 ,_, especially_RR in_II the_AT early_JJ years_NNT2 ,_, than_CSN that_DD1 allowed_VVN for_IF in_II the_AT '_NULL textbook_NN1 interpretation_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_II21 than_II22 determining_VVG the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT liberated_JJ self_NN1 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 its_APPGE essential_JJ identity_NN1 with_IW or_CC difference_NN1 from_II its_APPGE embodied_VVD ,_, socially_RR projected_JJ role_NN1 ,_, the_AT Gt_NP1 enacts_VVZ a_AT1 hermeneutic_JJ play_NN1 between_II two_MC poles_NN2 :_: an_AT1 involved_JJ ,_, empirical_JJ what_DDQ and_CC a_AT1 detached_JJ ,_, transcendent_NN1 who_PNQS ._. 
</s>
<s>
Married_JJ cohabitation_NN1 (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO 0.21_MC ,_, p<_FO 0.001_MC )_) and_CC having_VHG children_NN2 (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO 0.08_MC ,_, p<_FO 0.001_MC )_) are_VBR also_RR positively_RR related_VVN to_II religious_JJ attendance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 temporal_JJ alethic-deontic_JJ logicians_NN2 use_VV0 an_AT1 axiomatic_JJ proof_NN1 theory_NN1 ;_; semantically_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 describe_VV0 some_DD kind_NN1 of_IO tree-like_JJ structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 have_VH0 lots_PN of_IO inductive_JJ evidence_NN1 that_CST the_AT laws_NN2 of_IO nature_NN1 won_VVD '_NULL t_ZZ1 suddenly_RR change_VV0 tomorrow_RT ;_; they_PPHS2 '_NULL ve_VV0 always_RR remained_VVD constant_JJ in_II the_AT past_NN1 ,_, after_II all_DB ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT main_JJ aim_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 paper_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO characterise_VVI and_CC appropriately_RR motivate_VVI austere_JJ and_CC actually_RR classical_JJ first-_JJ and_CC second-order_JJ modal_JJ logics_NN2 having_VHG as_RG their_APPGE main_JJ distinguishing_JJ feature_NN1 a_AT1 strongly_RR Millian_JJ understanding_NN1 of_IO the_AT semantics_NN1 of_IO constants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, in_II Section_NN1 6_MC I_PPIS1 will_VM offer_VVI an_AT1 argument_NN1 that_CST (_( spatial_JJ )_) groupoids_NN2 are_VBR indeed_RR the_AT correct_JJ notion_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 next-level_JJ set_NN1 in_II the_AT context_NN1 of_IO the_AT foundations_NN2 of_IO mathematics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT vast_JJ literature_NN1 on_II the_AT demands_NN2 of_IO beneficence_NN1 boils_VVZ down_RP to_II a_AT1 simple_JJ question_NN1 :_: Does_VDZ '_NULL worthwhile_JJ life_NN1 '_NULL have_VH0 the_AT same_DA referent_NN1 in_II both_DB2 the_AT other-regarding_JJ obligation_NN1 and_CC the_AT self-regarding_JJ permission_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 B_ZZ1 be_VBI the_AT experiment_NN1 of_IO asking_VVG Bob_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ some_DD evidence_NN1 that_CST institutional_JJ differences_NN2 relating_VVG to_II adult_NN1 baptism_NN1 may_VM also_RR play_VVI a_AT1 role_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, where_RRQ is_VBZ their_APPGE beauty_NN1 or_CC ugliness_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ can_VM be_VBI experienced_VVN ?_? 
</s>
<s>
After_II all_DB ,_, according_II21 to_II22 the_AT original_JJ version_NN1 of_IO the_AT semantic_JJ view_NN1 ,_, the_AT grammatical_JJ form_NN1 is_VBZ merely_RR indeterminate_JJ with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 whether_CSW '_NULL depicts_VVZ b_ZZ1 '_NULL is_VBZ a_AT1 one-place_JJ predicate_NN1 or_CC a_AT1 two-place_JJ predicate_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 name_NN1 attached_VVN to_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL is_VBZ a_AT1 simple_JJ counterexample_NN1 to_II the_AT sufficiency_NN1 of_IO the_AT condition_NN1 identified_VVN by_II this_DD1 view_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rituals_NN2 that_CST "_" fit_VV0 "_" the_AT intensity_NN1 and_CC duration_NN1 of_IO such_DA emotions_NN2 not_XX only_RR properly_RR "_" adorn_VV0 "_" them_PPHO2 but_CCB also_RR strengthen_VV0 and_CC therefore_RR craft_VV0 the_AT corresponding_JJ emotional_JJ dispositions_NN2 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, to_TO have_VHI them_PPHO2 more_RGR consistently_RR on_II the_AT appropriate_JJ occasions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Three_MC often_RR discussed_VVN but_CCB still_RR poorly_RR understood_VVN identities_NN2 usually_RR aligned_VVN with_IW conservative_JJ Protestantism_NN1 are_VBR "_" born_VVN again_RT ,_, "_" "_" fundamentalist_NN1 ,_, "_" and_CC "_" evangelical_JJ "_" Christian_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ Xunzi_NN1 understood_VVN is_VBZ that_CST however_RRQV these_DD2 emotional_JJ capacities_NN2 got_VVN there_RL ,_, they_PPHS2 need_VV0 to_TO be_VBI cultivated_VVN and_CC refined_JJ through_II culture_NN1 to_TO do_VDI the_AT sort_NN1 of_IO job_NN1 Frank_NP1 thinks_VVZ they_PPHS2 do_VD0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, simply_RR moving_VVG an_AT1 initial_JJ distribution_NN1 forward_RL in_II time_NNT1 under_II the_AT dynamics_NN of_IO a_AT1 model_NN1 (_( even_RR a_AT1 good_JJ one_PN1 )_) need_VM not_XX yield_VVI decision-relevant_JJ evidence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB it_PPH1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 precisely_RR because_II21 of_II22 that_CST that_DD1 Quong_NN1 holds_VVZ you_PPY may_VM kill_VVI Bystander_NN1 and_CC Projectile_NN1 :_: Both_DB2 are_VBR people_NN you_PPY may_VM kill_VVI rather_CS21 than_CS22 bear_VVI the_AT cost_NN1 of_IO death_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, racial_JJ formation_NN1 happens_VVZ ,_, producing_VVG what_DDQ Sadri_NP1 Khiari_NP1 calls_VVZ '_NULL social_JJ races_NN2 '_NULL :_: '_NULL hierarchically-ordered_JJ social_JJ groups_NN2 that_CST think_VV0 of_IO themselves_PPX2 and_CC oppose_VV0 each_PPX221 other_PPX222 as_CSA races_NN2 ,_, demarcated_VVN by_II imagined_JJ and_CC reified_VVD differences_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Zizek_NP1 (_( 2001_MC )_) proposed_VVD that_CST if_CS one_PN1 where_RRQ to_TO encounter_VVI someone_PN1 who_PNQS claims_VVZ they_PPHS2 are_VBR fully_RR cured_VVN of_IO beliefs_NN2 and_CC accepts_VVZ society_NN1 as_CSA it_PPH1 is_VBZ ,_, you_PPY should_VM immediately_RR ask_VVI them_PPHO2 ,_, '_NULL Ok_RR ,_, but_CCB where_RRQ is_VBZ the_AT fetish_NN1 which_DDQ enables_VVZ you_PPY to_II (_( pretend_VV0 to_II )_) accept_VV0 reality_NN1 "_" the_AT way_NN1 it_PPH1 is_VBZ "_" ?_? &lsqb;_( emphasis_NN1 added_VVN &rsqb;_) '_NULL (_( 15_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD is_VBZ the_AT importance_NN1 to_II respondents_NN2 of_IO understanding_NN1 how_RRQ people_NN use_VV0 machines_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS needs_NN2 stated_VVN in_II general_JJ terms_NN2 are_VBR universal_JJ ,_, solutions_NN2 must_VM follow_VVI specific_JJ approaches_NN2 that_CST take_VV0 into_II considerations_NN2 the_AT peculiarities_NN2 of_IO each_DD1 country_NN1 ,_, region_NN1 or_CC group_NN1 of_IO people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 typically_RR think_VV0 that_DD1 coercion_NN1 requires_VVZ a_AT1 scenario_NN1 in_II which_DDQ one_MC1 person_NN1 ,_, P_ZZ1 ,_, manipulates_VVZ another_DD1 person_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ,_, Q_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ,_, options_NN2 ,_, typically_RR by_II making_VVG a_AT1 threat_NN1 that_CST results_NN2 in_II the_AT situation_NN1 wherein_RRQ Q_ZZ1 must_VM choose_VVI between_II doing_VDG as_II P_ZZ1 wants_VVZ or_CC some_DD bad_JJ alternative_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 logic_NN1 for_IF "_" secret_NN1 (_( fully_RR private_JJ )_) announcements_NN2 "_" was_VBDZ first_MD proposed_VVN by_II Gerbrandy_NP1 and_CC a_AT1 logic_NN1 for_IF "_" private_JJ ,_, but_CCB legal_JJ ,_, announcements_NN2 "_" (_( or_CC what_DDQ has_VHZ been_VBN called_VVN "_" fair-game_NN1 announcements_NN2 "_" )_) was_VBDZ developed_VVN by_II H._NP1 van_NP1 Ditmarsch_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
John_NP1 Taurek_NP1 argued_VVD that_CST Saving_VVG the_AT Greater_JJR Number_NN1 is_VBZ premised_VVN on_II a_AT1 perverted_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE moral_JJ relationships_NN2 with_IW other_JJ people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II such_DA a_AT1 case_NN1 one_PN1 may_VM use_VVI "_" cheng_NN1 "_" as_II a_AT1 word_NN1 in_II the_AT English_JJ language_NN1 ,_, realising_VVG that_DD1 "_" cheng_NN1 "_" is_VBZ not_XX the_AT same_DA as_CSA cheng_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC this_DD1 would_VM suggest_VVI that_CST the_AT standard_JJ account_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 is_VBZ indeed_RR not_XX sufficiently_RR demanding_VVG ,_, and_CC that_DD1 to_TO have_VHI knowledge_NN1 you_PPY need_VV0 something_PN1 very_JJ close_VVI to_II the_AT same_DA cognitive_JJ control_NN1 that_CST understanding_NN1 why_RRQ requires_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Few_DA2 countries_NN2 within_II the_AT World_NN1 Values_NN2 data_NN base_NN1 fit_VV0 the_AT description_NN1 of_IO having_VHG both_RR high_JJ government_NN1 regulation_NN1 and_CC low_JJ cultural_JJ religiousness_NN1 but_CCB most_DAT share_VV0 one_MC1 thing_NN1 in_RR21 common_RR22 :_: they_PPHS2 are_VBR currently_RR or_CC formerly_RR communist_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 can_VM be_VBI in_II error_NN1 about_II them_PPHO2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, because_CS our_APPGE sense_NN1 experience_NN1 may_VM rest_VVI on_II a_AT1 hallucination_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ case_NN1 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 the_AT visual_JJ appearance_NN1 of_IO something_PN1 without_RR that_CST this_DD1 something_PN1 is_VBZ really_RR there_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sibley_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Principle_NN1 ,_, unlike_II Mothersill_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ,_, does_VDZ not_XX directly_RR threaten_VVI the_AT shared_JJ character_NN1 answer_NN1 to_II the_AT articulation_NN1 question_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 T_ZZ1 be_VBI an_AT1 arithmetical_JJ theory_NN1 that_CST does_VDZ not_XX have_VHI full_JJ induction_NN1 ,_, in_II the_AT sense_NN1 that_CST there_EX are_VBR formulae_NN2 with_IW the_AT form_NN1 of_IO induction_NN1 axioms_NN2 that_CST are_VBR not_XX theorems_NN2 of_IO T_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Zizek_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 juxtaposition_NN1 of_IO the_AT negativity_NN1 of_IO subjectivity_NN1 onto_II the_AT negativity_NN1 of_IO objectivity_NN1 effectively_RR suspends_VVZ Kant_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 transcendental_JJ premise_NN1 with_IW regards_VVZ to_II the_AT separation_NN1 of_IO reflective_JJ activity_NN1 from_II that_DD1 on_II which_DDQ reflection_NN1 is_VBZ exerted_VVN ,_, in_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, the_AT separation_NN1 of_IO the_AT way_NN1 the_AT subject_NN1 accesses_VVZ ,_, in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 knowledge_NN1 ,_, the_AT world_NN1 from_II how_RRQ the_AT world_NN1 is_VBZ itself_PPX1 constituted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT route_NN1 to_II this_DD1 conclusion_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX support_VVI attributions_NN2 of_IO intentional_JJ agency_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 us_PPIO2 imagine_VVI Templeton_NP1 is_VBZ mistaken_VVN ,_, and_CC members_NN2 of_IO different_JJ species_NN can_VM have_VHI high_JJ exchangeability_NN1 ,_, or_CC members_NN2 of_IO the_AT same_DA species_NN can_VM have_VHI low_JJ exchangeability_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT argument_NN1 from_II divine_JJ omniscience_NN1 bears_VVZ a_AT1 strong_JJ resemblance_NN1 to_II a_AT1 traditional_JJ argument_NN1 against_II the_AT compatibility_NN1 of_IO human_JJ freedom_NN1 and_CC divine_JJ foreknowledge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ precisely_RR what_DDQ Berlin_NP1 labeled_VVD "_" negative_JJ liberty_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 if_CS22 that_DD1 regime_NN1 also_RR '_NULL guards_VVZ the_AT expropriated_JJ property_NN1 '_NULL from_II the_AT workers_NN2 !_! 
</s>
<s>
Ren_NN1 refers_VVZ to_II the_AT entirety_NN1 of_IO "_" one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 cultivated_JJ cognitive_JJ ,_, aesthetic_JJ ,_, moral_JJ ,_, and_CC religious_JJ sensibilities_NN2 as_CSA they_PPHS2 are_VBR expressed_VVN in_II one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ritualized_JJ roles_NN2 and_CC relationships_NN2 "_" (_( Ames_NP1 and_CC Rosemont_NP1 1999_MC :_: 49_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 all_DB argue_VV0 that_CST a_AT1 fictional_JJ object_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX represented_VVN by_II its_APPGE native_JJ representation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Standard_JJ discussions_NN2 of_IO Darwinian_JJ evolution_NN1 state_VV0 that_CST if_CS a_AT1 population_NN1 exhibits_VVZ phenotypic_JJ variation_NN1 ,_, fitness_NN1 differences_NN2 ,_, and_CC heredity_NN1 ,_, then_RT natural_JJ selection_NN1 will_VM occur_VVI within_II that_DD1 population_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 suggestion_NN1 can_VM be_VBI combined_VVN with_IW the_AT analysis_NN1 of_IO Walton_NP1 and_CC Koszowy_NP1 &lsqb;_( 29_MC &rsqb;_) that_CST portrays_VVZ using_VVG an_AT1 epistemic_JJ expert_NN1 as_II a_AT1 deontic_JJ authority_NN1 as_II a_AT1 common_JJ vehicle_NN1 for_IF carrying_VVG out_RP precisely_RR this_DD1 type_NN1 of_IO strategic_JJ maneuvering_NN1 to_TO make_VVI it_PPH1 seem_VVI inappropriate_JJ that_CST critical_JJ question_NN1 should_VM even_RR be_VBI raised_VVN at_RR21 all_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT idea_NN1 of_IO preference_NN1 is_VBZ purposefully_RR broad_JJ so_BCL21 as_BCL22 to_TO include_VVI not_XX only_RR consumer_NN1 preferences_NN2 ,_, but_CCB also_RR moral_JJ ,_, social_JJ ,_, and_CC political_JJ preferences_NN2 ,_, and_CC to_TO include_VVI both_DB2 egoist_NN1 and_CC benevolent_JJ preferences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO undertake_VVI this_DD1 task_NN1 ,_, the_AT paper_NN1 firstly_RR explores_VVZ the_AT content_NN1 and_CC expositional_JJ structure_NN1 of_IO the_AT first_MD three_MC sections_NN2 of_IO Chapter_NN1 1_MC1 of_IO Capital_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Wang_NP1 Bi_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 comment_VV0 simultaneously_RR also_RR proves_VVZ his_APPGE rendering_NN1 was_VBDZ then_RT already_RR "_" dao_NN1 is_VBZ hidden_VVN and_CC nameless_JJ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Unfortunately_RR ,_, as_CSA Christopher_NP1 Rowe_NP1 argues_VVZ ,_, Brickhouse_NP1 and_CC Smith_NP1 do_VD0 not_XX provide_VVI adequate_JJ support_NN1 for_IF such_DA an_AT1 '_NULL educational_JJ '_NULL programme_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE emigre_NN1 branch_NN1 had_VHD been_VBN for_IF a_AT1 long_JJ time_NNT1 detached_VVN from_II the_AT domestic_JJ affairs_NN2 and_CC Polish_JJ proletarian_JJ masses_NN2 and_CC was_VBDZ unable_JK to_TO adjust_VVI the_AT mode_NN1 of_IO writing_VVG to_II the_AT needs_NN2 of_IO mass_JJ propaganda_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE target_NN1 free_JJ agent_NN1 may_VM know_VVI what_DDQ his_APPGE or_CC her_APPGE duty_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, and_CC desire_NN1 to_TO bring_VVI about_RP what_DDQ duty_NN1 demands_NN2 ,_, but_CCB such_DA freedom_NN1 ,_, knowledge_NN1 of_IO duty_NN1 ,_, and_CC possession_NN1 of_IO appropriate_JJ desire_NN1 may_VM be_VBI merely_RR necessary_JJ for_IF bringing_VVG about_RP the_AT relevant_JJ act_NN1 ,_, not_XX both_RR necessary_JJ and_CC sufficient_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR the_AT important_JJ project_NN1 is_VBZ therefore_RR to_TO discover_VVI which_DDQ causal_JJ connections_NN2 really_RR matter_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 suspect_VV0 he_PPHS1 does_VDZ include_VVI the_AT '_NULL fiduciary_JJ '_NULL aspect_NN1 under_II the_AT first_MD sort_NN1 of_IO component_NN1 because_CS Helm_NP1 views_VVZ the_AT fiduciary_JJ aspect_NN1 of_IO faith_NN1 as_II a_AT1 commitment_NN1 involving_VVG more_DAR than_CSN simple_JJ beliefs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB what_DDQ are_VBR the_AT criteria_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 judgment_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ clear_JJ that_CST The_AT Matrix_NN1 does_VDZ present_VVI a_AT1 thought_NN1 experiment_NN1 ,_, namely_REX ,_, the_AT evil_JJ demon_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT way_NN1 illustrated_VVN in_II Figure_NN1 4_MC is_VBZ for_IF the_AT questioner_NN1 to_TO indicate_VVI in_II his_APPGE replies_NN2 that_CST he_PPHS1 is_VBZ not_XX being_VBG immodest_JJ by_II doubting_VVG the_AT expertise_NN1 of_IO the_AT expert_NN1 or_CC trying_VVG to_TO put_VVI himself_PPX1 in_II places_NN2 someone_PN1 who_PNQS knows_VVZ better_JJR than_CSN the_AT expert_NN1 ,_, or_CC as_CSA knowledge_NN1 of_IO the_AT subject_NN1 at_II issue_NN1 greater_JJR than_CSN that_DD1 of_IO the_AT expert_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT question_NN1 of_IO African_JJ philosophy_NN1 and_CC global_JJ justice_NN1 seems_VVZ pretty_RG much_DA1 like_II an_AT1 epistemic_JJ one_PN1 setting_VVG the_AT stage_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 duel_NN1 between_II the_AT protestants_NN2 (_( African_JJ philosophers_NN2 )_) and_CC the_AT contestants_NN2 (_( Western_JJ philosophers_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
La_NP1 Violencia_NP1 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 its_APPGE most_RGT distinguished_JJ historian_NN1 ,_, was_VBDZ a_AT1 mixture_NN1 of_IO official_JJ terror_NN1 ,_, partisan_JJ sectarianism_NN1 and_CC scorched-earth_JJ policy_NN1 that_CST resulted_VVD from_II the_AT crisis_NN1 of_IO the_AT coffee_NN1 republic_NN1 ,_, the_AT contest_NN1 over_II property_NN1 rights_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT extreme_JJ factionalism_NN1 of_IO both_DB2 political_JJ parties_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT resulting_JJ weakness_NN1 of_IO the_AT central_JJ government_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT concepts_NN2 of_IO global_JJ satisfiability_NN1 and_CC of_IO validity_NN1 are_VBR the_AT same_DA as_CSA for_IF ordinary_JJ modal_JJ language_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 calculated_JJ event_NN1 rate_NN1 is_VBZ called_VVN the_AT background_NN1 of_IO the_AT process_NN1 under_II investigation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Simondon_NN1 criticises_VVZ Marx_NP1 on_II two_MC grounds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ also_RR important_JJ to_TO note_VVI that_CST those_DD2 who_PNQS can_VM complain_VVI about_II lacking_VVG '_NULL political_JJ independence_NN1 '_NULL are_VBR the_AT landlocked_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX clear_JJ that_CST such_DA a_AT1 claim_NN1 is_VBZ coherent_JJ (_( much_RR less_RGR true_JJ )_) ,_, since_CS it_PPH1 seems_VVZ rather_RG implausible_JJ that_CST logicality_NN1 comes_VVZ in_II degrees_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, to_TO check_VVI whether_CSW a_AT1 finite_JJ Kripke_NN1 frame_NN1 satisfies_VVZ all_DB of_IO Reflexivity_NP1 ,_, Symmetry_NN1 and_CC n-Connectivity_JJ and_CC to_TO check_VVI whether_CSW ?_? 
</s>
<s>
With_IW one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 thought_VVD having_VHG renounced_VVN all_DB actions_NN2 in_II me_PPIO1 ,_, Someone_PN1 might_VM even_RR exhibit_VVI an_AT1 incredulous_JJ stare_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 may_VM be_VBI considered_VVN the_AT mother_NN1 of_IO the_AT universe_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 makes_VVZ links_NN2 between_II capitalism_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 initial_JJ assumptions_NN2 about_II the_AT value_NN1 of_IO human_JJ beings_NN2 and_CC its_APPGE now-contemporary_JJ naturalised_JJ assumptions_NN2 about_II the_AT value_NN1 of_IO human_JJ beings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ would_VM Powell_NP1 and_CC Zwolinski_NP1 argue_VV0 here_RL ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT most_RGT influential_JJ objections_NN2 to_II argument_NN1 views_NN2 usually_RR focus_VV0 on_II the_AT much_RR more_RGR ambitious_JJ claim_NN1 that_CST arguments_NN2 with_IW certain_JJ features_NN2 are_VBR also_RR sufficient_JJ for_IF explanation_NN1 in_RR21 general_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, research_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST CSR_NP1 investment_NN1 builds_VVZ insurance_NN1 protection_NN1 in_II the_AT form_NN1 of_IO positive_JJ '_NULL moral_JJ capital_NN1 '_NULL and_CC protects_VVZ firm_JJ value_NN1 following_VVG a_AT1 major_JJ negative_JJ event_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, a_AT1 major_JJ governance_NN1 failure_NN1 )_) by_II appeasing_VVG key_JJ constituent_NN1 interests_NN2 (_( 2011_MC )_) add_VV0 that_CST '_NULL CSR-as-insurance_NP1 '_NULL increases_VVZ a_AT1 firm_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 legitimacy_NN1 with_IW stakeholders_NN2 and_CC enables_VVZ it_PPH1 to_TO realize_VVI sustainable_JJ competitive_JJ advantages_NN2 over_II market_NN1 rivals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT most_RGT important_JJ newspapers_NN2 emphasised_VVD that_CST cmtc_NNU had_VHD been_VBN formed_VVN by_II acquiring_VVG the_AT assets_NN2 of_IO the_AT old_JJ concessionaires_NN2 ;_; mostly_RR old_JJ ,_, outdated_JJ or_CC even_RR broken_JJ vehicles_NN2 ,_, and_CC ,_, frequently_RR ,_, inadequate_JJ for_IF use_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_DAR than_CSN ever_RR ,_, for_IF the_AT entire_JJ mainline_NN1 ,_, that_DD1 question_NN1 remains_VVZ the_AT appropriate_JJ one_PN1 going_VVG forward_RL as_II a_AT1 half_DB century_NNT1 of_IO membership_NN1 losses_NN2 shows_VVZ every_AT1 sign_NN1 of_IO continuing_VVG into_II the_AT indefinite_JJ future_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_DAT of_IO what_DDQ one_PN1 says_VVZ is_VBZ certainly_RR truth-apt_JJ ,_, and_CC a_AT1 philosopher_NN1 who_PNQS has_VHZ the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ is_VBZ said_VVN thus_RR has_VHZ reason_NN1 to_TO introduce_VVI the_AT semantic_JJ concept_NN1 of_IO truth_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Testing_VVG this_DD1 cffDNA_NN1 in_II the_AT blood_NN1 of_IO RhDwomen_NN2 can_VM determine_VVI the_AT foetal_JJ RhD_NP1 type_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS it_PPH1 were_VBDR a_RR21 bit_RR22 stronger_JJR ,_, then_RT everything_PN1 would_VM have_VHI clumped_VVN up_RP into_II giant_JJ black_JJ holes_NN2 and_CC there_EX would_VM be_VBI no_AT life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 we_PPIS2 pick_VV0 a_AT1 choice_NN1 of_IO *R_FO as_II the_AT new_JJ number_NN1 system_NN1 with_IW which_DDQ we_PPIS2 ,_, from_RT31 now_RT32 on_RT33 ,_, measure_VV0 chance_NN1 ,_, replacing_VVG the_AT real_JJ numbers_NN2 for_IF this_DD1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT advantage_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 approach_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX just_RR that_CST it_PPH1 coincides_VVZ better_RRR with_IW our_APPGE intuitions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, for_IF me_PPIO1 ,_, Rebekah_NP1 Del_NP1 Rio_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 performance_NN1 and_CC rendition_NN1 of_IO "_" Llorando_NP1 (_( Crying_NN1 )_) "_" stand_VV0 out_RP as_II a_AT1 remarkable_JJ example_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 of_IO Lynch_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 most_RGT effective_JJ combinations_NN2 of_IO images_NN2 and_CC sounds_NN2 ,_, of_IO a_AT1 truly_RR strangely_RR moving_VVG scene_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC indeed_RR ,_, when_CS Frigg_NP1 and_CC Hoefer_NP1 (_( 2010_MC )_) elaborate_VV0 Lewis_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 account_VV0 ,_, they_PPHS2 consider_VV0 exactly_RR the_AT type_NN1 of_IO system_NN1 for_IF which_DDQ Spielraum_NN1 probabilities_NN2 are_VBR defined_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT rule_NN1 in_II Remark_NN1 2.1_MC was_VBDZ sound_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 sentence_NN1 with_IW full_JJ universal_JJ quantifiers_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 ?_? (_( x_ZZ1 ,_, ?_? (_( r_ZZ1 ,_, y_ZZ1 )_) )_) would_VM might_VM be_VBI followed_VVN by_II ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II Denmark_NP1 ,_, cultural_JJ institutions_NN2 repeatedly_RR create_VV0 "_" outreach_NN1 projects_VVZ "_" that_CST have_VH0 a_AT1 limited_JJ duration_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 restricted_JJ scope_NN1 ,_, often_RR inviting_JJ groups_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ have_VH0 not_XX sought_VVN out_RP the_AT institution_NN1 on_II their_APPGE own_DA initiative_NN1 ,_, to_TO contribute_VVI to_II the_AT institution_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB because_CS we_PPIS2 are_VBR prone_JJ to_TO think_VVI of_IO "_" way_NN1 ,_, ,_, superficially_RR ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 stretch_NN1 connecting_VVG two_MC places_NN2 ,_, our_APPGE word_NN1 '_NULL way_NN1 has_VHZ all_DB too_RG rashly_RR been_VBN considered_VVN unfit_JJ to_TO name_VVI what_DDQ Tao_NP1 says_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 the_AT direct_JJ reference_NN1 view_NN1 ,_, an_AT1 utterance_NN1 of_IO '_NULL Vulcan_NP1 does_VDZ not_XX exist_VVI '_NULL literally_RR says_VVZ nothing_PN1 ,_, because_CS it_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX express_VVI a_AT1 proposition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX think_VVI that_CST a_AT1 father_NN1 who_PNQS purchases_VVZ a_AT1 bicycle_NN1 because_II21 of_II22 a_AT1 moral_JJ obligation_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, because_CS he_PPHS1 promised_VVD his_APPGE son_NN1 that_CST he_PPHS1 would_VM buy_VVI the_AT bike_NN1 )_) fails_VVZ to_TO give_VVI consent_NN1 to_II the_AT purchase_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 include_VV0 the_AT proof_NN1 in_II Appendix_NN1 C_ZZ1 ,_, since_CS much_DA1 of_IO the_AT modal_JJ semantics_NN1 rides_VVZ on_II uniformity_NN1 considerations_NN2 and_CC since_CS these_DD2 uniformity_NN1 considerations_NN2 aren_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 explicit_JJ in_II the_AT statement_NN1 of_IO the_AT results_NN2 in_II the_AT unpublished_JJ McCarty_NP1 (_( 1984_MC ,_, pp_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS can_VM '_NULL t_ZZ1 get_VV0 us_PPIO2 a_AT1 genuine_JJ instance_NN1 of_IO EO_NP1 ,_, then_RT no_AT other_JJ evidential_JJ circumstances_NN2 can_VM and_CC so_RR EO_NP1 will_VM have_VHI no_AT genuine_JJ instances-no_JJ potential_JJ norm_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 form_NN1 will_VM be_VBI a_AT1 genuine_JJ norm_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 imposes_VVZ upon_II it_PPH1 both_RR modesty_NN1 and_CC daring_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS in_II the_AT eye-exam_NN1 we_PPIS2 qualify_VV0 as_CSA knowing_VVG in_II some_DD weak_JJ way_NN1 ,_, then_RT ,_, we_PPIS2 still_RR fall_VV0 short_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB ,_, in_II my_APPGE opinion_NN1 ,_, the_AT loyalty_NN1 value_NN1 dominated_VVD ,_, requiring_VVG obedience_NN1 and_CC total_JJ state_NN1 dominance_NN1 of_IO individuals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II the_AT second_MD cohort_NN1 ,_, "_" a_AT1 decision_NN1 was_VBDZ made_VVN to_TO move_VVI to_II climate_NN1 change_NN1 more_RGR fully_RR because_CS people_NN in_II my_APPGE office_NN1 were_VBDR working_VVG on_II it_PPH1 and_CC thought_VVD it_PPH1 was_VBDZ important_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Tensions_NN2 between_II traditional_JJ academic_JJ autonomy_NN1 and_CC the_AT pressures_NN2 toward_II corporate-like_JJ audit_NN1 cultures_NN2 in_II the_AT university_NN1 settings_NN2 may_VM help_VVI to_TO produce_VVI purposive_JJ decoupling_NN1 from_II reporting_VVG policies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 get_VVI a_RR31 little_RR32 bit_RR33 philosophical_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Administrators_NN2 had_VHD been_VBN subject_II21 to_II22 hazy_JJ and_CC arbitrary_JJ evaluations_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE patriotism_NN1 during_II the_AT Revolution_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ perceived_VVN that_CST the_AT discussions_NN2 only_RR had_VHN a_AT1 direct_JJ impact_NN1 on_II treatment_NN1 decisions_NN2 during_II the_AT stay_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 patient_NN1 on_II a_AT1 few_DA2 occasions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB clearly_RR ,_, this_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 rather_RG special_JJ Aristotelian_JJ notion_NN1 of_IO potential_JJ infinity_NN1 which_DDQ not_XX all_DB of_IO us-in_PPIO2 our_APPGE natural_JJ stance_NN1 to_II the_AT world-would_VM be_VBI ready_JJ to_TO accept_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Eagleton_NN1 demurs_NN2 but_CCB only_RR to_II the_AT extent_NN1 of_IO pointing_VVG out_RP that_DD1 ,_, '_NULL whatever_DDQV its_APPGE limits_NN2 '_NULL ,_, the_AT work_NN1 of_IO Althusser_NP1 '_NULL was_VBDZ trying_VVG to_TO shift_VVI the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO ideology_NN1 on_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 much_RR less_RGR conscious_JJ and_CC much_RR more_RGR practical_JJ institutional_JJ place_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT adoption_NN1 of_IO shared_JJ decision-making_NN1 in_II some_DD areas_NN2 of_IO medicineespecially_RR in_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO life_NN1 and_CC palliative_JJ medicine_NN1 domainsis_NN1 clearly_RR a_AT1 positive_JJ development_NN1 ,_, as_CSA it_PPH1 provides_VVZ room_NN1 for_IF dialo_NN1 ?_? gue_NN1 in_II the_AT process_NN1 leading_VVG up_II21 to_II22 the_AT expression_NN1 of_IO the_AT decision_NN1 ,_, the_AT outcome_NN1 of_IO which_DDQ is_VBZ then_RT recorded_VVN in_II the_AT form_NN1 of_IO consent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 would_VM offer_VVI that_CST this_DD1 collection_NN1 of_IO essays_NN2 drives_VVZ home_RL the_AT multiply_VV0 experienced_JJ reality_NN1 that_CST ethnographic_JJ fieldwork_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 demanding_JJ enterprise_NN1 involving_VVG the_AT entire_JJ selfhood_NN1 -_- intellectual_JJ ,_, emotional_JJ ,_, physical_JJ ,_, psychological_JJ and_CC spiritual_JJ -_- of_IO the_AT researcher_NN1 ;_; no_AT part_NN1 can_VM conveniently_RR be_VBI packed_VVN up_RP and_CC left_VVN at_II home_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Deductively_RR valid_JJ inferences_NN2 remain_VV0 a_AT1 limiting_JJ case_NN1 of_IO such_DA reasoning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT next_MD one_PN1 says_VVZ that_CST this_DD1 construction_NN1 turns_VVZ Kripke_NP1 frames_VVZ satisfying_JJ Reflexivity_NN1 and_CC Symmetry_NN1 into_II state_NN1 spaces_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II passing_VVG to_II the_AT conclusion_NN1 we_PPIS2 can_VM discharge_VVI the_AT top_JJ nodes_NN2 that_CST are_VBR labeled_VVN with_IW the_AT i_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nobody_PN1 made_VVD art_NN1 before_II 50,000_MC years_NNT2 ago_RA :_: everybody_PN1 did_VDD afterward_JJ "_" (_( quoted_VVN in_II Appenzeller_NP1 1998_MC ,_, 1451_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, ensuring_VVG that_CST the_AT rights_NN2 and_CC property_NN1 of_IO the_AT people_NN would_VM not_XX be_VBI infringed_VVN upon_II ,_, democracy_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 system_NN1 that_CST "_" esteemed_VVD the_AT virtuous_JJ and_CC benefited_VVD the_AT people_NN ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
NR_II buttresses_NN2 NEC_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 support_VV0 for_IF rhetorical_JJ co-operativity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Roughly_RR put_VVN ,_, on_II impure_JJ type_NN1 theories_NN2 intuitions_NN2 concerning_II the_AT creation_NN1 and_CC fine-individuation_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 musical_JJ work_NN1 may_VM be_VBI accommodated_VVN by_II taking_VVG its_APPGE act_NN1 of_IO composition_NN1 as_CSA its_APPGE originating_JJ ,_, identity-determining_NN1 involved_VVD particular_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, the_AT usual_JJ way_NN1 of_IO cleaning_VVG a_AT1 public_JJ bathhouse_NN1 daily_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO clean_VVI its_APPGE inside_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB if_CS *R_FO is_VBZ the_AT size_NN1 of_IO R_ZZ1 ,_, as_CSA was_VBDZ assumed_VVN ,_, then_RT we_PPIS2 will_VM eventually_RR run_VVI out_II21 of_II22 infinitesimals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rentier_NN1 Inclination_NN1 versus_II Industrial_JJ Entrepreneurship_NN1 Industrial_JJ entrepreneurship_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX strongly_RR anchored_VVN in_II French_JJ history_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_CS he_PPHS1 accepts_VVZ the_AT false_JJ position_NN1 that_CST Marx_NP1 wants_VVZ to_TO get_VVI rid_VVN of_IO all_DB conflict_NN1 ,_, contradiction_NN1 and_CC alienation_NN1 in_II human_JJ existence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II an_AT1 analogous_JJ line_NN1 of_IO reasoning_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM plausibly_RR reject_VVI the_AT transfer_NN1 premise_NN1 in_II the_AT nonforcing_JJ moneypump_NN1 argument_NN1 for_IF transitivity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, over_II the_AT last_MD decade_NNT1 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 witnessed_VVN growing_JJ research_NN1 linking_VVG ethical_JJ climates_NN2 to_II both_DB2 ethical_JJ as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 behavioral_JJ outcomes_NN2 in_II the_AT workplace_NN1 ,_, and_CC identifying_VVG the_AT organizational_JJ and_CC teamlevel_VV0 antecedents_NN2 of_IO ethical_JJ climates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC of_IO the_AT largest_JJT private_JJ satellite_NN1 networks_NN2 in_II Pakistan_NP1 ,_, Geo_NP1 Television_NN1 and_CC ARY_NP1 ,_, have_VH0 taken_VVN the_AT lead_NN1 in_II introducing_VVG novel_JJ religious_JJ content_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 in_II featuring_VVG the_AT most_RGT widely_RR watched_VVN religious_JJ content_NN1 in_II Pakistan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 urban_JJ centres_NN2 (_( PTV_NP1 is_VBZ more_RGR popular_JJ in_II rural_JJ areas_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Billy_NP1 ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ in_II flow_NN1 (_( or_CC something_PN1 close_RR to_II it_PPH1 )_) ,_, he_PPHS1 does_VDZ not_XX need_VVI to_TO force_VVI himself_PPX1 at_RR21 all_RR22 -_- in_II that_DD1 sense_NN1 his_APPGE taking_VVG the_AT test_NN1 is_VBZ effortless_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 light_II32 of_II33 this_DD1 ,_, one_PN1 can_VM appreciate_VVI the_AT audacity_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 name_NN1 like_II Krispy_JJ Cream_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ doubles_VVZ its_APPGE semantic_JJ power_NN1 by_II combining_VVG two_MC contrasting_JJ ,_, magical_JJ qualities_NN2 ,_, crispness_NN1 and_CC creaminess-Coco_NP1 Pops_VVZ are_VBR no_RR21 doubt_RR22 up_II21 to_II22 something_PN1 similar_JJ with_IW their_APPGE motto_NN1 ,_, "_" just_RR like_II a_AT1 chocolate_NN1 milkshake_NN1 only_RR crunchy_JJ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Importantly_RR ,_, though_CS ,_, this_DD1 kind_NN1 of_IO study_NN1 was_VBDZ meant_VVN to_TO cultivate_VVI one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 moral_JJ character_NN1 ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 it_PPH1 also_RR lent_VVD one_MC1 cultural_JJ or_CC literary_JJ standing_NN1 ,_, or_CC advanced_VVD one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 career_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 are_VBR "_" taken_VVN for_IF granted_VVN "_" in_II the_AT sense_NN1 that_CST they_PPHS2 are_VBR not_XX part_NN1 of_IO the_AT content_NN1 of_IO the_AT original_JJ statement_NN1 ,_, but_CCB their_APPGE truth_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 precondition_NN1 of_IO the_AT statement_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 felicity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Altogether_RR ,_, the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST ethno-religious_JJ identities_NN2 may_VM persist_VVI ,_, in_II changed_JJ form_NN1 ,_, after_CS religious_JJ exit_NN1 and_CC joining_VVG a_AT1 new_JJ religious_JJ group_NN1 and_CC that_DD1 religious_JJ ,_, cultural_JJ ,_, and_CC social_JJ factors_NN2 may_VM play_VVI a_AT1 part_NN1 in_II shaping_JJ variations_NN2 in_II holdover_NN1 identities_NN2 across_II different_JJ ethno-religious_JJ groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ why_RRQ the_AT Guoyu_NN1 praises_VVZ him_PPHO1 ,_, saying_VVG ,_, "_" Shun_NP1 died_VVD in_II the_AT wilds_NN2 while_CS serving_VVG the_AT people_NN ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Now_RT let_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 embed_VVI this_DD1 interaction_NN1 in_II a_AT1 longer-term_JJ ,_, repeat-game_NN1 structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 if_CS22 less_RGR literal_JJ ,_, "_" recognize_VV0 "_" is_VBZ indeed_RR better_RRR than_CSN "_" hold_NN1 "_" or_CC "_" allow_VV0 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Why_RRQ would_VM these_DD2 sounds_NN2 of_IO the_AT city_NN1 that_CST one_PN1 adds_VVZ to_II the_AT real_JJ things_NN2 have_VH0 inherent_JJ aesthetic_JJ qualities_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Apostolic_JJ Era_NN1 &lsqb;_( 4_MC BCE-100CE_NP1 &rsqb;_) )_) ,_, presupposes_VVZ the_AT Markan_JJ priority_NN1 thesis_NN1 ,_, thereby_RR giving_VVG a_AT1 nod_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE own_DA to_II no_AT less_RGR serious_JJ scholarship_NN1 on_II the_AT compositional_JJ history_NN1 of_IO the_AT New_JJ Testament_NN1 and_CC ,_, in_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, the_AT first_MD three_MC Gospels_NN2 -_- an_AT1 approach_NN1 that_CST produces_VVZ a_AT1 story_NN1 rather_RG different_JJ from_II the_AT conventional_JJ view_NN1 of_IO many_DA2 Christians_NN2 (_( let_VV0 alone_RR from_II those_DD2 scholars_NN2 who_PNQS still_RR prioritise_VV0 the_AT text_NN1 of_IO Matthew_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CS31 far_CS32 as_CS33 I_PPIS1 can_VM tell_VVI ,_, this_DD1 second_NNT1 worry_NN1 has_VHZ received_VVN no_AT attention_NN1 in_II the_AT literature_NN1 on_II skepticism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bergstrom_VV0 and_CC Rosvall_NP1 point_NN1 briefly_RR to_II an_AT1 answer_NN1 ,_, but_CCB some_DD of_IO the_AT objections_NN2 raised_VVN to_II their_APPGE work_NN1 show_VV0 the_AT need_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 more_RGR thorough_JJ justification_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 particular_JJ logic_NN1 can_VM often_RR be_VBI transformed_VVN into_II a_AT1 program_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 argue_VV0 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ possible_JJ to_TO employ_VVI this_DD1 technique_NN1 at_II the_AT middle_JJ stage_NN1 of_IO the_AT development_NN1 of_IO the_AT system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_RR Futurism_NN1 and_CC ISIS_NP1 "_" decompose_VV0 "_" objects_NN2 over_II time_NNT1 and_CC space_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 point_NN1 is_VBZ further_RRR illustrated_VVN by_II the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 find_VV0 a_AT1 negative_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II being_VBG Muslim_JJ and_CC life_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 :_: Islamic_JJ individuals_NN2 appear_VV0 to_TO be_VBI generally_RR less_RGR satisfied_JJ than_CSN those_DD2 without_IW a_AT1 religious_JJ affiliation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, the_AT poem_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 form_NN1 appears_VVZ as_II the_AT free_JJ decision_NN1 of_IO the_AT poet_NN1 himself_PPX1 and_CC perfectly_RR fused_VVN with_IW what_DDQ the_AT poem_NN1 seeks_VVZ to_TO convey_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Danger_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 relational_JJ property_NN1 ,_, for_IF "_" something_PN1 can_VM be_VBI dangerous_JJ only_RR to_II some_DD creature_NN1 or_CC other_JJ ,_, and_CC whether_CSW31 or_CSW32 not_CSW33 something_PN1 is_VBZ dangerous_JJ depends_VVZ on_II the_AT creature_NN1 in_II question_NN1 "_" (_( 63_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Otte_NP1 (_( 2009_MC )_) has_VHZ argued_VVN that_CST (_( 5_MC )_) is_VBZ necessarily_RR false_JJ and_CC so_RR is_VBZ compatible_JJ with_IW no_AT proposition_NN1 ,_, including_II (_( 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Chang_NP1 ,_, this_DD1 is_VBZ one_MC1 main_JJ aspect_NN1 of_IO the_AT practical_JJ scientific_JJ relevance_NN1 of_IO the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO induction_NN1 (_( ibid._RR ,_, 71f_RA ._. )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 concept_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ constituted_VVN in_II people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 worshipful_JJ reactions_NN2 to_II the_AT world_NN1 ,_, the_AT latter_DA of_IO which_DDQ reveal_VV0 what_DDQ it_PPH1 means_VVZ to_TO speak_VVI of_IO God_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 necessary_JJ existence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Adams_NP1 and_CC Garrison_NN1 ,_, in_II none_PN of_IO these_DD2 cases_NN2 is_VBZ it_PPH1 warranted_VVN to_TO speak_VVI about_II cognitive_JJ processing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Liu_NP1 Ping_NN1 discusses_VVZ patriotism_NN1 and_CC nationalism_NN1 in_II31 regard_II32 to_II33 culture_NN1 and_CC values_NN2 and_CC also_RR the_AT role_NN1 of_IO the_AT prophetic_JJ voice_NN1 in_II Chinese_JJ society_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL ,_, one_PN1 thinks_VVZ of_IO Zhu_NP1 Xi_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reforms_NN2 of_IO the_AT examination_NN1 system_NN1 in_II Song_NN1 China_NN1 that_CST led_VVD to_II the_AT canonisation_NN1 of_IO the_AT works_NN of_IO Mencius_NP1 or_CC the_AT Synod_NN1 of_IO Hippo_NP1 ,_, canonising_VVG both_DB2 the_AT content_NN1 and_CC the_AT order_NN1 of_IO Biblical_JJ texts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, Niv_NP1 and_CC colleagues_NN2 entered_VVD the_AT three_MC competing_JJ models_NN2 into_II a_AT1 regression_NN1 analysis_NN1 against_II the_AT fMRI_NN2 data_NN to_TO determine_VVI which_DDQ model_NN1 provided_VVD a_AT1 better_JJR fit_NN1 to_II the_AT fMRI_NN2 data_NN for_IF a_AT1 given_JJ brain_NN1 region_NN1 of_IO interest_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Does_VDZ the_AT axiom_NN1 of_IO prudence_NN1 make_VV0 only_RR a_AT1 negative_JJ claim_NN1 forbidding_JJ time-preference_NN1 or_CC also_RR a_AT1 positive_JJ one_PN1 telling_VVG us_PPIO2 to_TO promote_VVI our_APPGE good_JJ ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS this_DD1 question_NN1 is_VBZ distinct_JJ from_II the_AT question_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 religious_JJ expression_NN1 would_VM increase_VVI the_AT likelihood_NN1 of_IO experiencing_VVG and_CC perceiving_VVG religious_JJ discrimination_NN1 ,_, its_APPGE logic_NN1 is_VBZ in_II many_DA2 ways_NN2 an_AT1 extension_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 question_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 principle_NN1 appears_VVZ to_TO be_VBI inconsistent_JJ with_IW impartial_JJ reasons_NN2 ,_, for_IF in_II a_AT1 situation_NN1 in_II which_DDQ your_APPGE options_NN2 are_VBR to_TO give_VVI a_AT1 slightly_RR larger_JJR welfare_NN1 boost_NN1 to_II a_AT1 well-off_JJ person_NN1 ,_, or_CC a_AT1 slightly_RR smaller_JJR welfare_NN1 boost_NN1 to_II a_AT1 much_RR worse-off_JJR person_NN1 ,_, you_PPY may_VM well_RR have_VHI more_DAR reason_NN1 to_TO do_VDI the_AT latter_DA ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, Non-Liability_NP1 does_VDZ not_XX imply_VVI it_PPH1 is_VBZ permissible_JJ for_IF Civilian_JJ to_TO kill_VVI in_II self-defense_NN1 if_CS doing_VDG so_RR will_VM be_VBI a_AT1 catastrophe_NN1 ,_, if_CS ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, doing_VDG so_RR will_VM ensure_VVI the_AT unjust_JJ side_NN1 wins_VVZ the_AT war_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 though_CS22 Bandiera_NP1 Rossa_NP1 was_VBDZ in_II fact_NN1 the_AT largest_JJT force_NN1 in_II the_AT Roman_JJ Resistance_NN1 ,_, official_JJ commemorations_NN2 and_CC mainstream_JJ historiography_NN1 have_VH0 long_RR centred_VVN almost_RR exclusively_RR on_II the_AT activity_NN1 of_IO parties_NN2 belonging_VVG to_II the_AT Comitato_NP1 di_NP1 Liberazione_NP1 Nazionale_FW coalition_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ formed_VVD the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO the_AT post-_NN1 1948_MC political_JJ establishment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT benefit_NN1 of_IO such_DA principles_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST they_PPHS2 can_VM be_VBI acceptable_JJ to_II and_CC justified_VVN in_II a_AT1 specific_JJ situation_NN1 by_II a_AT1 wide_JJ range_NN1 of_IO moral_JJ theories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX enough_RR ;_; what_DDQ is_VBZ also_RR needed_VVN is_VBZ mutual_JJ candor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT alternative_JJ picture_NN1 of_IO the_AT relation_NN1 between_II Modally_NP1 Robust_JJ Act_NN1 Consequentialism_NN1 and_CC virtue_NN1 starts_VVZ from_II an_AT1 independently_RR plausible_JJ claim_NN1 about_II the_AT goodness_NN1 of_IO agents_NN2 '_NULL characters_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 C-Dδ4_FO ,_, ≥_FO is_VBZ "_" transitive_JJ "_" ,_, i.e._REX ,_, if_CS world_NN1 is_VBZ at_RR21 least_RR22 as_RG good_JJ as_CSA world_NN1 (_( relative_II21 to_II22 world_NN1 )_) and_CC is_VBZ at_RR21 least_RR22 as_RG good_JJ as_CSA world_NN1 (_( relative_II21 to_II22 )_) ,_, then_RT is_VBZ at_RR21 least_RR22 as_RG good_JJ as_CSA (_( relative_II21 to_II22 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA being_NN1 the_AT case_NN1 one_PN1 should_VM all_DB the_AT more_DAR cause_NN1 one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 will_NN1 to_TO be_VBI sincere_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 general_JJ rule_NN1 skill_NN1 and_CC effort_NN1 can_VM be_VBI substituted_VVN for_IF each_PPX221 other_PPX222 to_II some_DD degree_NN1 :_: a_AT1 less_RGR skilled_JJ agent_NN1 can_VM make_VVI up_RP for_IF her_APPGE lack_NN1 of_IO talent_NN1 with_IW great_JJ effort_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 lazy_JJ agent_NN1 may_VM compensate_VVI her_APPGE lack_NN1 of_IO effort_NN1 through_II great_JJ skill_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS speculative_JJ ,_, this_DD1 may_VM suggest_VVI that_DD1 ,_, for_IF Whites_NN2 ,_, regularly_RR congregating_VVG in_II religious_JJ settings_NN2 that_CST rarely_RR question_VV0 the_AT status_NN121 quo_NN122 of_IO existing_JJ power_NN1 relationships_NN2 ,_, in_II the_AT US_NP1 and_CC around_II the_AT world_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ consistent_JJ with_IW support_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 political_JJ party_NN1 perceived_VVN as_CSA being_VBG committed_VVN to_II the_AT maintenance_NN1 of_IO current_JJ social-political_JJ arrangements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Popular_JJ struggle_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 phenomenon_NN1 always_RR constituted_VVN around_RP and_CC through_II a_AT1 shifting_JJ set_NN1 of_IO political_JJ identities_NN2 ,_, must_VM be_VBI brought_VVN into_II theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 then_RT examine_VV0 some_DD of_IO the_AT earliest_JJT mediaeval_JJ commentaries_NN2 on_II the_AT Categories_NN2 showing_VVG how_RRQ the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO relation_NN1 ,_, and_CC in_RR21 particular_RR22 of_IO individual_JJ relations_NN2 ,_, was_VBDZ developed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 alternative_JJ reconstruction_NN1 might_VM involve_VVI interpreting_VVG deliberative_JJ choice_NN1 as_II a_AT1 causal_JJ determinant_NN1 for_IF phronsis_NN1 ,_, where_CS the_AT latter_DA is_VBZ conceived_VVN as_CSA engaged_VVN in_II spontaneously_RR virtuous_JJ action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 way_NN1 of_IO putting_VVG the_AT point_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO note_VVI ,_, as_CSA Cohen_NP1 did_VDD ,_, that_CST "_" we_PPIS2 need_VV0 to_TO expand_VVI the_AT category_NN1 of_IO '_NULL arguer_NN1 '_NULL to_TO include_VVI everyone_PN1 who_PNQS is_VBZ relevant_JJ for_IF the_AT judgment_NN1 that_CST an_AT1 argument_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, or_CC is_VBZ not_XX ,_, fully_RR satisfying_JJ "_" (_( 2013_MC ,_, p._NN1 480_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Or_CC we_PPIS2 might_VM focus_VVI on_II the_AT state_NN1 vis-a-vis_II justice_NN1 not_XX (_( or_CC not_XX only_RR )_) in_II31 light_II32 of_II33 these_DD2 instrumental_JJ virtues_NN2 ,_, but_CCB because_CS ,_, as_CSA Michael_NP1 Blake_NP1 (_( 2001_MC ,_, 2013a_FO )_) suggests_VVZ ,_, citizenship_NN1 calls_VVZ for_IF a_AT1 specific_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO justification_NN1 which_DDQ may_VM have_VHI distributive_JJ implications_NN2 for_IF members_NN2 ,_, that_DD1 neither_RR commit_VV0 them_PPHO2 to_II broader_JJR obligations_NN2 of_IO justice_NN1 outside_II the_AT bounds_NN2 of_IO the_AT coercive_JJ state_NN1 ,_, nor_CC justify_VV0 outsiders_NN2 making_VVG comparably_RR strong_JJ claims_NN2 on_II members_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA discussed_VVN in_II section_NN1 4.1_MC ,_, when_CS there_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 infinite_JJ population_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 finite_JJ number_NN1 of_IO types_NN2 ,_, inclusive_JJ fitness_NN1 calculations_NN2 from_II quantitative_JJ genetics_NN1 and_CC evolutionary_JJ game_NN1 theory_NN1 are_VBR equivalent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Something_PN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 happening_NN1 is_VBZ many_DA2 things_NN2 '_NULL happening_VVG ;_; it_PPH1 is_VBZ many_DA2 things_NN2 coming_VVG together_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Now_RT ,_, whether_CSW we_PPIS2 accept_VV0 this_DD1 dialectic_NN1 or_CC not_XX ,_, the_AT key_JJ thing_NN1 to_TO note_VVI about_II it_PPH1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT criterion_NN1 which_DDQ it_PPH1 invokes_VVZ for_IF adequate_JJ metaphysical_JJ thinking_NN1 is_VBZ something_PN1 that_CST Bradley_NP1 explicitly_RR identifies_VVZ as_RG intellectual_JJ satisfaction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II single-parent_JJ households_NN2 ,_, the_AT single_JJ parent_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 educational_JJ level_NN1 was_VBDZ measured_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 ,_, for_IF Frege_NP1 ,_, does_VDZ not_XX show_VVI that_CST t(PP)_NNU itself_PPX1 is_VBZ consistent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 direct_JJ manifestation_NN1 of_IO the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST conservation_JJ symmetries_NN2 are_VBR rooted_VVN in_II physical_JJ dynamics_NN ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 redundant_JJ representative_JJ structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Air_NN1 capture_NN1 and_CC storage_NN1 ranked_VVN poorly_RR with_IW the_AT male_JJ citizens_NN2 '_NULL panel_NN1 and_CC moderately_RR with_IW the_AT female_JJ panel_NN1 ,_, and_CC moderately_RR for_IF the_AT specialists_NN2 overall_RR ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 ranked_VVD highest_RRT for_IF the_AT industry_NN1 sector_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 suggest_VV0 that_CST SBNR_NP1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 stable_JJ religious_JJ identity_NN1 (_( Ammerman_NP1 2013b_FO ;_; Bellah_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1985_MC ;_; Mercadante_NP1 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT hypothesis_NN1 that_CST the_AT initial-condition_JJ distributions_NN2 are_VBR approximately_RR macroperiodic_JJ is_VBZ relatively_RR simple_JJ and_CC straightforward_JJ ,_, and_CC it22_FO predicts_VVZ something_PN1 we_PPIS2 actually_RR observe_VV0 :_: namely_REX ,_, that_CST in_II systems_NN2 like_II wheels_NN2 of_IO fortune_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ there_EX are_VBR symmetries_NN2 that_CST we_PPIS2 can_VM exploit_VVI to_TO find_VVI out_RP about_II strike_NN1 ratios_NN2 ,_, the_AT frequencies_NN2 in_II long_JJ series_NN of_IO trials_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO be_VBI approximately_RR equal_JJ to_II those_DD2 strike_VV0 ratios_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT scientific_JJ attitude_NN1 is_VBZ just_RR that_DD1 attitude_NN1 which_DDQ allows_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO evaluate_VVI properly_RR ;_; to_II not_XX let_VVN dogma_NN1 or_CC fixed_JJ values_NN2 interfere_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 minimal_JJ characterization_NN1 ,_, to_II a_AT1 first_MD approximation_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO necessary_JJ and_CC sufficient_JJ conditions_NN2 that_CST captures_VVZ all_DB and_CC only_RR the_AT genuine_JJ cases_NN2 of_IO indeterminacy_NN1 and_CC which_DDQ is_VBZ neutral_JJ between_II the_AT different_JJ substantive_JJ views_NN2 regarding_II the_AT underlying_JJ nature_NN1 and_CC logic_NN1 of_IO indeterminacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Dutch_JJ pride_NN1 themselves_PPX2 on_II their_APPGE long_JJ tradition_NN1 of_IO tolerance_NN1 ,_, but_CCB this_DD1 was_VBDZ part_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 broader_JJR system_NN1 of_IO noninterference_NN1 with_IW other_JJ pillars_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, temporal_JJ indeterminacy_NN1 is_VBZ one_MC1 of_IO the_AT only_JJ defining_JJ marks_NN2 of_IO sound_NN1 art_NN1 that_CST theorist_NN1 Alan_NP1 Licht_NP1 gives_VVZ in_II a_AT1 recent_JJ article_NN1 ,_, writing_VVG that_CST a_AT1 "_" sound_NN1 art_NN1 piece_NN1 ,_, like_II a_AT1 visual_JJ artwork_NN1 ,_, has_VHZ no_AT specified_JJ timeline_NN1 ;_; it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI experienced_VVN over_II a_AT1 long_JJ or_CC short_JJ period_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 ,_, without_IW missing_VVG the_AT beginning_NN1 ,_, middle_NN1 ,_, or_CC end_NN1 "_" (_( 2009_MC ,_, 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 hold_VV0 Pythagoras_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 theorem_NN1 to_TO be_VBI an_AT1 eternal_JJ truth_NN1 ,_, but_CCB my_APPGE son_NN1 can_VM '_NULL t_ZZ1 believe_VV0 it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, since_CS the_AT explication_NN1 of_IO the_AT conditional_NN1 is_VBZ in_II31 accordance_II32 with_II33 (_( 1_MC1 )_) ,_, the_AT generalized_JJ semantic_JJ idea_NN1 of_IO the_AT conditional_NN1 is_VBZ satisfied_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, as_CS31 soon_CS32 as_CS33 the_AT thoughts_NN2 and_CC volitions_NN2 of_IO the_AT inner_JJ heart/mind_NN1 manifest_VV0 themselves_PPX2 on_II the_AT exterior_NN1 they_PPHS2 will_VM suffer_VVI the_AT observation_NN1 and_CC critique_NN1 of_IO public_NN1 opinion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD terms_NN2 are_VBR obviously_RR just_RR the_AT normal_JJ kinetic_JJ and_CC potential_JJ energies_NN2 that_CST one_PN1 would_VM expect_VVI in_II a_AT1 Lagrangian_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ equally_RR true_JJ that_CST something_PN1 must_VM exist_VVI simpliciter_NN1 to_TO be_VBI acted_VVN on_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 -theory_JJ T_ZZ1 is_VBZ called_VVN complete_JJ if_CS either_DD1 T_ZZ1 ?_? ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT answer_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ true_JJ ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 is_VBZ indeed_RR incoherent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC similarly_RR for_IF the_AT relational_JJ '_NULL routes_NN2 '_NULL between_II objects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 '_NULL drift_NN1 toward_II greater_JJR bureaucratisation_NN1 was_VBDZ evident_JJ '_NULL ,_, they_PPHS2 say_VV0 ,_, but_CCB '_NULL it_PPH1 is_VBZ inaccurate_JJ to_TO talk_VVI unproblematically_RR of_IO "_" Russian_JJ dictatorship_NN1 "_" '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT examples_NN2 that_CST show_VV0 that_CST a_AT1 hyperreal_JJ field_NN1 of_IO the_AT size_NN1 of_IO the_AT real_JJ numbers_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX always_RR good_JJ enough_RR uniformly_RR just_RR rely_VV0 on_II cardinality_NN1 considerations_NN2 ,_, and_CC thus_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ reasonable_JJ to_TO conjecture_VVI that_CST an_AT1 F-suitable_JJ hyperreal_JJ field_NN1 will_VM be_VBI one_PN1 that_CST depends_VVZ only_RR on_II the_AT cardinality_NN1 of_IO F._NP1 I_PPIS1 suspect_VV0 that_CST the_AT next_MD larger_JJR cardinality_NN1 will_VM do_VDI ,_, for_CS no_RRQV31 matter_RRQV32 how_RRQV33 additivity_NN1 will_VM work_VVI out_RP ,_, but_CCB that_DD1 must_VM remain_VVI a_AT1 conjecture_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 risqué_JJ of_IO simplification_NN1 or_CC misunderstanding_NN1 might_VM be_VBI pointed_VVN out-in_II another_DD1 way_NN1 than_CSN the_AT well-known_JJ American_JJ pop_NN1 art_NN1 ,_, or_CC even_RR its_APPGE Western_JJ European_JJ versions_NN2 ,_, these_DD2 works_NN reflect_VV0 different_JJ backgrounds_NN2 and_CC ,_, supposedly_RR ,_, different_JJ institutional_JJ contexts_NN2 for_IF the_AT work_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS the_AT referents_NN2 of_IO natural_JJ sounds_NN2 express_VV0 a_AT1 kind_NN1 of_IO otherness_NN1 ,_, the_AT referents_NN2 of_IO artifactual_JJ sounds_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX ._. 
</s>
<s>
Kant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 laws_NN2 are_VBR fit_JJ for_IF particles_NN2 but_CCB are_VBR too_RG narrow_JJ to_TO handle_VVI continuous_JJ bodies_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ his_APPGE doctrine_NN1 of_IO matter_NN1 demands_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Max_NP1 Eastman_NP1 reported_VVD ,_, Lenin_NP1 '_NULL continued_VVD to_TO laugh_VVI a_RR21 little_RR22 at_II the_AT memory_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 remark_NN1 after_CS he_PPHS1 had_VHD begun_VVN to_TO say_VVI something_PN1 else_RR '_NULL (_( according_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 footnote_NN1 by_II Riddell_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX claim_VVI that_CST the_AT relational_JJ approach_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT only_JJ legitimate_JJ justification_NN1 for_IF attributing_VVG value_NN1 to_II the_AT nonhuman_NN1 environment_NN1 ,_, but_CCB rather_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 justification_NN1 that_CST offers_VVZ greater_JJR common_JJ ground_NN1 for_IF those_DD2 who_PNQS take_VV0 environmental_JJ ethics_NN seriously_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT narrative_NN1 prepares_VVZ the_AT reader_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 state_NN1 of_IO affairs_NN2 long_RR before_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ clearly_RR articulated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Grounded_JJ theory_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 natural_JJ companion_NN1 because_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ ,_, at_II its_APPGE core_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 commitment_NN1 by_II the_AT researcher_NN1 to_TO allow_VVI the_AT data_NN to_TO first_MD speak_VVI for_IF itself_PPX1 before_II bringing_VVG existing_JJ theory_NN1 to_TO bear_VVI on_II the_AT analysis_NN1 (_( Glaser_NP1 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ work_NN1 he_PPHS1 discusses_VVZ ad_NN1 ignorantiam_NN1 arguments_NN2 which_DDQ are_VBR clearly_RR linked_VVN to_II belief_NN1 formation_NN1 ,_, not_XX to_II practical_JJ reasoning_NN1 ,_, and_CC here_RL too_RR there_EX are_VBR some_DD concerns_NN2 worth_II investigating_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II section_NN1 III_MC ,_, I_PPIS1 argued_VVD that_CST ,_, though_CS economic_JJ analysis_NN1 is_VBZ clearly_RR relevant_JJ to_II a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO claims_NN2 the_AT Arnold_NP1 ,_, Bowie_NP1 ,_, and_CC Hartman_NP1 make_VV0 to_TO articulate_VVI and_CC defend_VVI their_APPGE account_NN1 of_IO respect_NN1 for_IF persons_NN2 ,_, their_APPGE basic_JJ notion_NN1 of_IO respect_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX rely_VVI upon_II the_AT truth_NN1 of_IO any_DD of_IO these_DD2 claims_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 takes_VVZ a_AT1 stand_NN1 on_II the_AT specific_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO phronsis_NN1 (_( whether_CSW excellently_RR or_CC more_RGR fallibly_RR interpreted_VVN )_) ;_; viz._REX But_CCB ,_, he_PPHS1 did_VDD not_XX think_VVI these_DD2 were_VBDR necessary_JJ to_TO become_VVI a_AT1 superior_JJ person_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT language_NN1 resources_NN2 of_IO the_AT religious_JJ variety_NN1 will_VM differ_VVI differently_RR from_II other_JJ language_NN1 resources_NN2 within_II the_AT same_DA community_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT recent_JJ discovery_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 interpretation_NN1 of_IO constructive_JJ type_NN1 theory_NN1 into_II abstract_JJ homotopy_NN1 theory_NN1 suggests_VVZ a_AT1 new_JJ approach_NN1 to_II the_AT foundations_NN2 of_IO mathematics_NN1 with_IW intrinsic_JJ geometric_JJ content_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 computational_JJ implementation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Socrates_NP1 unambiguously_RR states_VVZ that_CST what_DDQ causes_VVZ this_DD1 distortion_NN1 is_VBZ vicious_JJ action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB such_DA redistribu_NN1 ?_? tion_NN1 is_VBZ unlikely_JJ on_II its_APPGE own_DA to_TO resolve_VVI racial_JJ patterns_NN2 of_IO social_JJ disadvantage_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II first_MD sight_NN1 someone_PN1 may_VM claim_VVI that_DD1 ,_, according_II21 to_II22 him_PPHO1 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ only_RR the_AT give-and-take_JJ type_NN1 of_IO friendship_NN1 ,_, but_CCB when_CS we_PPIS2 take_VV0 a_AT1 closer_JJR look_NN1 we_PPIS2 will_VM probably_RR see_VVI that_CST he_PPHS1 says_VVZ this_DD1 to_TO argue_VVI against_II De_NP1 Montaigne_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 conception_NN1 of_IO friendship_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ he_PPHS1 thereby_RR acknowledges_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 explanation_NN1 accounts_VVZ for_IF why_RRQ faith_NN1 (_( in_II )_) is_VBZ a_AT1 different_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO trust_NN1 than_CSN other_JJ ET-based_JJ beliefs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 factors_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX involve_VVI cognitive_JJ influences_NN2 ,_, and_CC therefore_RR ,_, do_VD0 not_XX imply_VVI the_AT cognitive_JJ penetrability_NN1 of_IO perception_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 analysis_NN1 allows_VVZ the_AT article_NN1 to_II flesh_NN1 out_RP the_AT challenge_NN1 ,_, and_CC demonstrate_VV0 why_RRQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ currently_RR non-completeable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 appears_VVZ to_TO fit_VVI with_IW the_AT analysis_NN1 of_IO Broue_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 student_NN1 Serge_NP1 Lambert_NP1 ,_, who_PNQS argues_VVZ that_CST though_CS the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO patriotic_JJ Resistance_NN1 was_VBDZ in_II most_DAT countries_NN2 a_AT1 continuation_NN1 of_IO the_AT pre-1939_JJ popular_JJ fronts_NN2 promoted_VVN by_II the_AT Communist_JJ parties_NN2 ,_, such_DA politics_NN1 had_VHD never_RR sunk_VVN roots_NN2 within_II Italy_NP1 ,_, as_CSA the_AT 1926_MC fascist_JJ ban_NN1 had_VHD '_NULL suspended_VVN Italian_JJ communism_NN1 for_IF twenty_MC years_NNT2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 are_VBR losing_VVG our_APPGE ability_NN1 to_TO treat_VVI life_NN1 as_II an_AT1 intrinsic_JJ value_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 give_VV0 an_AT1 algorithm_NN1 that_CST will_VM convert_VVI any_DD closed_JJ ,_, simple_JJ ,_, O-preferring_JJ tableau_NN1 for_IF P_ZZ1 T_ZZ1 into_II a_AT1 P-winning_JJ N-strategy_NN1 for_IF ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT part_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE argument_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST the_AT relevant_JJ indeterminacy_NN1 in_II personal_JJ identity_NN1 is_VBZ owing_II21 to_II22 (_( say_VV0 )_) the_AT meaning_NN1 of_IO '_NULL person_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT more_RGR creaturely_JJ choices_NN2 that_CST are_VBR permitted_VVN ,_, the_AT wider_JJR the_AT realm_NN1 of_IO possibility_NN1 will_VM be_VBI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT semantic_JJ value_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 variable_NN1 v_ZZ1 is_VBZ thus_RR a_AT1 function_NN1 from_II contexts_NN2 of_IO use_NN1 to_II individuals_NN2 ,_, mapping_VVG each_DD1 context_NN1 of_IO use_NN1 c_ZZ1 to_II the_AT individual_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ assigned_VVN to_II v_ZZ1 by_II c_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 variable-assignment_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB we_PPIS2 think_VV0 this_DD1 is_VBZ an_AT1 illusion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 think_VV0 this_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT mechanism_NN1 by_II which_DDQ Liu_NP1 Xie_NP1 is_VBZ able_JK to_TO elevate_VVI the_AT value_NN1 of_IO human_JJ wen_NN1 ,_, writing_VVG ,_, and_CC literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 also_RR underscores_VVZ the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO universal_JJ health_NN1 care_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Prior_RR cautionary-tale_JJ theorists_NN2 have_VH0 defined_VVN ethics_NN as_II a_AT1 response_NN1 to_II agency_NN1 risks_NN2 (_( e.g._REX Buchanan_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC ;_; Heath_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ,_, but_CCB have_VH0 not_XX engaged_VVN with_IW the_AT thesis_NN1 of_IO bilateralism_NN1 or_CC the_AT problems_NN2 of_IO moral_JJ hazard_NN1 and_CC adverse_JJ selection_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, in_II a_AT1 paper_NN1 by_II Hanage_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, the_AT investigators_NN2 differentiate_VV0 a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO Neisseria_NP1 species_NN ,_, in_II31 spite_II32 of_II33 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST all_DB of_IO the_AT bacteria_NN2 inhabit_VV0 the_AT human_JJ nose_NN1 and_CC exhibit_VV0 lateral_JJ gene_NN1 transfer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CS31 far_CS32 as_CS33 the_AT outcomes_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 culture_NN1 are_VBR concerned_JJ ,_, the_AT Salz_NP1 report_NN1 focuses_VVZ particularly_RR on_II the_AT LIBOR_NP1 fixing_NN1 scandal1_FO ;_; however_RR ,_, it_PPH1 also_RR links_VVZ it_PPH1 with_IW other_JJ bad_JJ outcomes_NN2 ,_, one_MC1 of_IO which_DDQ is_VBZ the_AT payment_NN1 protection_NN1 insurance_NN1 (_( PPI_NP1 )_) mis-selling_VVG scandal_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ Barclays_NP1 was_VBDZ also_RR heavily_RR implicated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Jury_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 eyes_NN2 ,_, 0_MC '_NULL s_ZZ1 questioning_NN1 had_VHD little_DA1 effect_NN1 ;_; the_AT Jury_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 probabilities_NN2 assigned_VVN to_II the_AT types_NN2 of_IO 0_MC and_CC 1_MC1 did_VDD not_XX shift_VVI ,_, and_CC 0_MC was_VBDZ no_AT closer_JJR to_II his_APPGE winning_JJ condition_NN1 in_II getting_VVG the_AT court_NN1 to_TO agree_VVI with_IW him_PPHO1 that_CST 1_MC1 was_VBDZ not_XX an_AT1 impartial_JJ witness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR sense_VV0 perceptions_NN2 are_VBR evaluated_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 what_DDQ actions_VVZ to_TO take_VVI based_VVN on_II what_DDQ is_VBZ observed_VVN (_( Dewey_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1915_MC &rsqb;_) 1998b_FO ,_, 254_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR expect_VV0 that_CST this_DD1 ostensive_JJ learnability_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX apply_VVI to_II theoretical_JJ concepts-it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI fruitless_JJ ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, to_TO want_VVI to_TO teach_VVI a_AT1 native_JJ about_II the_AT physical_JJ concept_NN1 of_IO force_NN1 purely_RR ostensively_RR ,_, without_IW years_NNT2 of_IO education_NN1 in_II foreign_JJ languages_NN2 and_CC natural_JJ science_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Gt_NP1 also_RR recognizes_VVZ the_AT ethical_JJ significance_NN1 of_IO familial_JJ role-duties_NN2 (_( kula_JJ dharma_NN1 )_) and_CC aims_VVZ to_TO recover_VVI confidence_NN1 in_II the_AT directives_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 ritual-based_JJ social_JJ hierarchy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO reiterate_VVI ,_, it_PPH1 may_VM help_VVI to_TO outline_VVI our_APPGE justification_NN1 of_IO path_NN1 induction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 bear_VV0 witness_NN1 to_II the_AT all-pervasive_JJ influence_NN1 of_IO substantialism_NN1 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 even_RR manifestly_RR animist_NN1 terms_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 '_NULL wit_NN1 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL idea_NN1 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL eyes_NN2 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL I_PPIS1 '_NULL ,_, and_CC even_RR the_AT '_NULL soul_NN1 '_NULL itself_PPX1 are_VBR viewed_VVN in_II strictly_RR humoral_JJ ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ to_TO say_VVI organicist_NN1 ,_, terms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 haven_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 explored_VVD the_AT possibilities_NN2 for_IF making_VVG good_JJ on_II our_APPGE opening_NN1 motivation_NN1 :_: to_TO find_VVI a_AT1 single_JJ account_NN1 of_IO explanation_NN1 that_CST can_VM help_VVI us_PPIO2 understand_VVI all_DB kinds_NN2 of_IO explanation_NN1 ,_, from_II an_AT1 explanatory_JJ proof_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 mathematical_JJ theorem_NN1 all_DB the_AT way_NN1 to_II explanations_NN2 of_IO billiard_NN1 ball_NN1 velocities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA capital_NN1 relocated_VVN at_II home_NN1 or_CC abroad_RL ,_, it_PPH1 established_VVD economic_JJ ,_, cultural_JJ and_CC political_JJ linkages_NN2 which_DDQ generally_RR contributed_VVN to_II bringing_VVG capitalists_NN2 closer_RRR together_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perhaps_RR the_AT best_RRT test_VV0 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 of_IO whether_CSW something_PN1 is_VBZ manifested_VVN in_II behaviour_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT aptness_NN1 of_IO the_AT metaphor_NN1 of_IO seeing_VVG ,_, not_XX the_AT truth-value_NN1 of_IO the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 literally_RR see_VV0 the_AT state_NN1 or_CC trait_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE second_MD shared_JJ reason_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT opening_NN1 part_NN1 of_IO the_AT Han_NP1 Feizi_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 "_" Decoding_JJ Lao_NP1 Zi_NP1 "_" (_( Jie_NP1 Lao_NP1 )_) ,_, which_DDQ explains_VVZ section_NN1 38_MC of_IO the_AT Laozi_NN1 ,_, namely_REX ,_, the_AT first_MD section_NN1 of_IO "_" Virtue_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, there_EX were_VBDR the_AT "_" cultural_JJ revolution_NN1 "_" in_II 1793_MC ,_, the_AT second_MD year_NNT1 of_IO the_AT Republic_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT "_" May_NP1 storm_VVI "_" of_IO 1968_MC that_CST started_VVD in_II France_NP1 and_CC swept_VVN across_II European_NN1 and_CC American_JJ universities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS a_AT1 colour-mosaic_JJ painting_NN1 appears_VVZ to_II us_PPIO2 ,_, the_AT aesthetic_JJ quality_NN1 "_" elegant_JJ "_" does_VDZ not_XX actually_RR exist_VVI in_II the_AT work_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Drawing_VVG on_II this_DD1 case_NN1 ,_, Section_NN1 3_MC argues_VVZ that_CST currently_RR for_IF at_RR21 least_RR22 some_DD economic_JJ model_NN1 of_IO choice_NN1 behaviour_NN1 ,_, the_AT benefits_NN2 derivable_JJ from_II neurally_RR informing_VVG an_AT1 economic_JJ model_NN1 do_VD0 not_XX involve_VVI special_JJ tractability_NN1 costs_NN2 (_( i.e._REX tractability_NN1 costs_VVZ that_CST are_VBR too_RG high_JJ and_CC specifically_RR due_II21 to_II22 neurally_RR informing_VVG a_AT1 model_NN1 of_IO choice_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Evolution_NN1 often_RR selects_VVZ for_IF quick_JJ and_CC dirty_JJ solutions_NN2 to_II adaptive_JJ problems_NN2 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 precise_JJ solutions_NN2 ,_, because_CS the_AT quick_JJ solution_NN1 may_VM be_VBI cheaper_JJR or_CC more_RGR accessible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT question_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ these_DD2 '_NULL other_JJ '_NULL social_JJ practices_NN2 are_VBR is_VBZ never_RR broached_VVN by_II Banaji_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR recently_RR ,_, Christian_JJ Marclay_NN1 has_VHZ produced_VVN a_AT1 video_NN1 installation_NN1 entitled_VVN Guitar_NN1 Drag_NN1 (_( 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Then_RT before_CS you_PPY learn_VV0 any_DD relevant_JJ information_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 offer_VV0 you_PPY a_AT1 second_MD bet_NN1 :_: if_CS more_DAR toothpaste_NN1 comes_VVZ next_MD ,_, you_PPY give_VV0 me_PPIO1 nine_MC dollars_NNU2 ;_; otherwise_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 give_VV0 you_PPY ten_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, Jane_NP1 is_VBZ sincere_JJ ,_, Jane_NP1 intends_VVZ to_TO do_VDI as_CSA she_PPHS1 promises_VVZ ,_, and_CC John_NP1 believes_VVZ that_CST she_PPHS1 intends_VVZ to_TO do_VDI as_CSA she_PPHS1 promises_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC perhaps_RR most_RGT frequently_RR ,_, these_DD2 phenomenological_JJ features_NN2 are_VBR captured_VVN by_II the_AT characterization_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 hallucination_NN1 as_II an_AT1 experience_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 "_" sense_NN1 of_IO reality_NN1 "_" comparable_JJ to_II that_DD1 of_IO a_AT1 veridical_JJ perceptual_JJ experience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nonetheless_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ incorrect_JJ to_TO claim_VVI that_DD1 Political_JJ Marxism_NN1 provides_VVZ an_AT1 answer_NN1 to_II the_AT problematic_JJ which_DDQ UCD_NP1 is_VBZ aiming_VVG to_TO address_VVI ,_, or_CC to_TO dismiss_VVI our_APPGE criticism_NN1 of_IO the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO such_DA a_AT1 theory_NN1 in_II Political_JJ Marxism_NN1 as_CSA '_NULL simply_RR inaccurate_JJ '_NULL or_CC a_AT1 '_NULL misrepresentation_NN1 of_IO the_AT social-property_JJ relations_NN2 approach_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, the_AT Pew_NN1 report_NN1 of_IO the_AT 2014_MC Religious_JJ Landscape_NN1 Study_NN1 asserts_VVZ the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 is_VBZ becoming_VVG more_RGR spiritual_JJ and_CC less_RGR religious_JJ in_RR21 general_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB if_CS this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX so_RR ,_, even_RR God_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 chosen_JJ people_NN and_CC even_RR the_AT kings_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR descendants_NN2 of_IO David_NP1 whom_PNQO God_NP1 Himself_PPX1 made_VVD king_NN1 will_VM be_VBI abandoned_VVN by_II God_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT multidimensional_JJ semantics_NN1 ,_, the_AT realism_NN1 I_PPIS1 am_VBM suggesting_VVG means_NN that_CST for_IF any_DD proposition_NN1 A_ZZ1 and_CC world_NN1 wi_NN2 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 fact_NN1 of_IO the_AT matter_NN1 as_II21 to_II22 whether_CSW wi_NN2 is_VBZ or_CC is_VBZ not_XX counteractual_JJ under_II the_AT supposition_NN1 that_CST A._NP1 Fast_JJ and_CC slow_JJ processes_NN2 are_VBR ultimately_RR compatible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Acting_VVG on_II a_AT1 grander_JJR scale_NN1 ,_, Bolivia_NP1 has_VHZ enacted_VVN a_AT1 Law_NN1 of_IO the_AT Rights_NN2 of_IO Mother_NNB Earth_NP1 ,_, and_CC Indigenous_JJ peoples_NN2 from_II across_II the_AT globe_NN1 have_VH0 charted_VVN a_AT1 renewed_JJ vision_NN1 of_IO sustainability_NN1 that_CST includes_VVZ the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO living_VVG well_RR ,_, or_CC Buen_FW Vivir_NP1 ,_, an_AT1 idea_NN1 that_CST has_VHZ regained_VVN prominence_NN1 in_II Latin_JJ America_NP1 (_( McGregor_NP1 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Arguably_RR there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 conflict_NN1 between_II the_AT forms_NN2 of_IO the_AT research_NN1 exhibition_NN1 and_CC the_AT essay_NN1 exhibition_NN1 :_: the_AT research_NN1 exhibition_NN1 must_VM aim_VVI at_II some_DD kind_NN1 of_IO methodology_NN1 and_CC be_VBI a_AT1 place_NN1 for_IF enacting_VVG research_NN1 ,_, while_CS the_AT essay_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 more_RGR free_JJ form_NN1 ,_, based_VVN on_II the_AT author_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 subjective_JJ voice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 the_AT Benefits_NN2 to_II Inquiry_NN1 Argument_NN1 is_VBZ sound_JJ and_CC that_CST one_MC1 also_RR accepts_VVZ (_( 7_MC )_) ,_, that_CST S_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 belief_NN1 that_CST P_ZZ1 is_VBZ ultimately_RR the_AT result_NN1 of_IO F._NP1 A_ZZ1 natural_JJ objection_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST (_( 7_MC )_) is_VBZ false_JJ because_CS there_EX won_VVD '_NULL t_ZZ1 be_VBI deep_JJ disagreements_NN2 within_II research_NN1 contexts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 need_VV0 to_TO articulate_VVI the_AT real_JJ class_NN1 situation_NN1 of_IO persons_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR not_XX merely_RR raceless_JJ ,_, sexless_JJ workers_NN2 ,_, but_CCB for_IF whom_PNQO racial_JJ and_CC sexual_JJ oppression_NN1 are_VBR significant_JJ determinants_NN2 in_II their_APPGE working/economic_JJ lives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Right_RR also_RR forces_VVZ a_AT1 subjective_JJ personality_NN1 onto_II individuals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II mid-2013_MC ,_, it_PPH1 published_VVD 93_MC recommendations_NN2 for_IF further_RRR micro-economic_JJ reform_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Obviously_RR there_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 empirical_JJ question_NN1 about_II whether_CSW in_II fact_NN1 people_NN do_VD0 pick_VVI up_RP moral_JJ flaws_NN2 through_II being_VBG exposed_VVN to_II them_PPHO2 in_II others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, analyses_NN2 of_IO secular_JJ phenomena_NN2 as_CSA manifestations_NN2 of_IO implicit_JJ religion_NN1 often_RR lack_VV0 the_AT dynamism_NN1 ,_, the_AT movement_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT boundary_NN1 transgression_NN1 that_CST I_PPIS1 am_VBM attempting_VVG to_TO capture_VVI here_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, though_CS ,_, the_AT insensitivity_NN1 diagnosis_NN1 won_VVD '_NULL t_ZZ1 give_VV0 us_PPIO2 what_DDQ we_PPIS2 are_VBR after_II :_: a_AT1 position_NN1 that_CST rejects_VVZ the_AT Same_DA Boat_NN1 Hypothesis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA findings_NN2 extend_VV0 previous_JJ work_NN1 in_II the_AT sociology_NN1 of_IO religion_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ illustrates_VVZ the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 subcultural_JJ identities_NN2 with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 attitudes_NN2 about_II religious_JJ influence_NN1 in_II the_AT political_JJ arena_NN1 (_( Regnerus_NP1 and_CC Smith_NP1 1998_MC ;_; Regnerus_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1999_MC )_) ,_, educational_JJ preferences_NN2 and_CC policies_NN2 (_( Beyerlein_NP1 2004_MC ;_; Sikkink_NP1 1999_MC )_) ,_, and_CC other_JJ spheres_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perhaps_RR d_ZZ1 becomes_VVZ or_CC arbitrarily_RR close_RR to_II 1_MC1 ,_, once_CS the_AT '_NULL might-not_XX '_NULL has_VHZ been_VBN uttered_VVN ,_, which_DDQ could_VM explain_VVI why_RRQ a_AT1 sentence_NN1 like_II (_( 5_MC )_) is_VBZ unassertable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS they_PPHS2 loved_VVD their_APPGE kin_NN ,_, they_PPHS2 were_VBDR filial_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 from_II these_DD2 two_MC studies_NN2 highlight_VV0 the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ differences_NN2 and_CC religious_JJ contexts_NN2 as_CSA they_PPHS2 relate_VV0 to_II perceived_JJ social_JJ interactions_NN2 with_IW ex-offenders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS so_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ an_AT1 artistic_JJ value_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT court_NN1 then_RT deliberated_VVD over_RP whether_CSW CT_NN1 could_VM be_VBI considered_VVN an_AT1 appropriate_JJ KM_NNU diagnostic_JJ instrument_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 mentioned_VVD earlier_RRR that_CST Phillips_NP1 (_( 2011_MC ,_, forthcoming_JJ )_) seems_VVZ to_TO commit_VVI to_II some_DD such_DA position_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ hard_JJ to_TO understand_VVI ,_, for_IF the_AT reasons_NN2 I_PPIS1 gave_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS others_NN2 acted_VVD differently_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 would_VM still_RR have_VHI such_DA knowledge_NN1 ,_, and_CC this_DD1 knowledge_NN1 would_VM likewise_RR be_VBI modally_RR robust_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT prototype_NN1 and_CC the_AT image_NN1 belong_VV0 to_II the_AT category_NN1 of_IO relatives_NN2 ,_, in_II the_AT same_DA way_NN1 as_CSA the_AT double_NN1 and_CC the_AT half_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Han_NP1 Feizi_NP1 (_( d._NNU 233_MC B.c.E._NP1 )_) repeatedly_RR emphasized_VVD the_AT ruler_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 need_VV0 to_TO "_" embody_VVI the_AT Way_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, the_AT view_NN1 here_RL adopted_VVN by_II Confucius_NP1 is_VBZ quite_RG analogous_JJ to_II the_AT view_NN1 advocated_VVN by_II Socrates_NP1 and_CC Plato_NP1 in_II Euthyphro_NP1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 disapprove_VV0 of_IO a_AT1 son_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 indictment_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE father_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 right-wing_JJ turn_NN1 of_IO the_AT Pasado_NN1 y_ZZ1 Presente_NP1 group_NN1 was_VBDZ also_RR marked_VVN by_II the_AT publication_NN1 in_II 1981_MC of_IO Arthur_NP1 Rosenberg_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Democracy_NN1 and_CC Socialism_NN1 :_: A_AT1 Contribution_NN1 to_II the_AT Political_JJ History_NN1 of_IO the_AT Past_JJ 150_MC Years_NNT2 (_( 1938_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ subsumes_VVZ the_AT history_NN1 of_IO Marxism_NN1 into_II the_AT history_NN1 of_IO supra-class_NN1 '_NULL democracy_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 are_VBR consistent_JJ with_IW prior_JJ work_NN1 indicating_VVG higher_JJR levels_NN2 of_IO religiosity_NN1 among_II Southerners_NN2 among_II both_DB2 African_JJ Americans_NN2 (_( Taylor_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2004_MC )_) and_CC whites_NN2 (_( Fichter_NP1 and_CC Maddox_NP1 1965_MC ;_; Roof_NN1 and_CC McKinney_NP1 1987_MC ;_; Stark_NP1 and_CC Bainbridge_NP1 1985_MC ;_; Stump_VV0 1986_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, this_DD1 shift_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX mean_VVI that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR undertaking_VVG two_MC different_JJ and_CC unrelated_JJ tasks_NN2 ,_, one_PN1 aimed_VVD at_II historical_JJ understanding_NN1 and_CC the_AT other_JJ at_II philosophical_JJ construction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_II some_DD extent_NN1 we_PPIS2 are_VBR following_VVG in_II the_AT footsteps_NN2 of_IO Bruno_NP1 Latour_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 call_VV0 for_IF a_AT1 symmetrical_JJ anthropology_NN1 that_CST applies_VVZ the_AT same_DA research_NN1 tools_NN2 to_II the_AT West_ND1 and_CC the_AT Rest_NN1 alike_RR (_( Latour_NP1 1993_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR human_JJ menopause_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ can_VM occur_VVI less_DAR than_CSN two-thirds_MF into_II the_AT lifespan_NN1 ,_, cries_VVZ out_RP for_IF explanation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bradley_NP1 points_VVZ out_RP that_CST Hershenov_NP1 has_VHZ assumed_VVN that_CST a_AT1 person_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX have_VHI a_AT1 well-being_NN1 level_NN1 at_II a_AT1 world_NN1 in_II which_DDQ she_PPHS1 never_RR exists_VVZ -_- even_RR an_AT1 actual_JJ person_NN1 ,_, who_PNQS might_VM be_VBI considering_VVG scenarios_NN2 in_II which_DDQ she_PPHS1 does_VDZ not_XX exist_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Potentiality_NN1 ,_, from_II this_DD1 perspective_NN1 ,_, does_VDZ not_XX qualify_VVI as_CSA xing_VVG because_CS ,_, by_II definition_NN1 ,_, potential_NN1 is_VBZ neither_RR complete_JJ nor_CC indicative_JJ ofany_NN1 particular_JJ moral_JJ outcome_NN1 without_IW "_" cumulated_JJ wei_NN2 "_" (_( jiwei_NN2 )_) ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
How_RRQ could_VM li_MC and_CC yi_NNU ,_, being_VBG nothing_PN1 but_II cumulated_JJ wei_NN2 ,_, be_VBI the_AT xing_NN1 of_IO human_JJ being_NN1 ?_? "_" 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, at_II the_AT cost_NN1 of_IO some_DD extra_JJ harm_NN1 the_AT just_JJ cause_NN1 comes_VVZ within_II reach_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Call_VV0 this_DD1 initial_JJ segment_NN1 of_IO SS_NP1 ,_, and_CC the_AT possible_JJ worlds_NN2 containing_VVG SS_NP1 the_AT SS_NP1 -worlds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II such_DA cases_NN2 caring_VVG is_VBZ an_AT1 essential_JJ part_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 loving_JJ relationship_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB this_DD1 is_VBZ hardly_RR a_AT1 feasible_JJ position_NN1 ;_; it_PPH1 implies_VVZ that_CST we_PPIS2 have_VH0 perfect_JJ knowledge_NN1 of_IO why_RRQ every_AT1 evil_NN1 that_CST occurs_VVZ is_VBZ in_II fact_NN1 necessary_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Occasionally_RR yuan_NNU is_VBZ a_AT1 loan-character_NN1 for_IF yun_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ means_VVZ "_" to_TO store_VVI up_RP "_" or_CC "_" to_TO accumulate_VVI ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT fact_NN1 that_CST introspection_NN1 reveals_VVZ perceptual_JJ experience_NN1 to_TO lack_VVI any_DD intrinsic_JJ character-so_CS they_PPHS2 argue-shows_NN2 that_CST whatever_DDQV character_NN1 it_PPH1 possesses_VVZ is_VBZ derived_VVN from_II features_NN2 of_IO the_AT environment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 popular_JJ metaphor_NN1 of_IO the_AT pre-60_JJ Netherlands_NP1 presents_VVZ the_AT Dutch_JJ nation_NN1 as_CSA divided_VVN into_II several_DA2 distanced_JJ pillars_NN2 of_IO segmented_JJ organizations_NN2 ,_, all_DB representing_VVG distinct_JJ social_JJ groups_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 Catholics_NN2 ,_, Protestants_NN2 and_CC Social_JJ Democrats_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ together_RL are_VBR suggested_VVN to_TO hold_VVI up_RP the_AT Netherlands_NP1 (_( van_NP1 Dam_NP1 2015_MC ,_, 293_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR as_CSA Hopkins_NP1 highlights_VVZ recent_JJ debates_NN2 over_II the_AT primary_JJ role_NN1 of_IO critical_JJ discourse_NN1 have_VH0 typically_RR been_VBN between_II those_DD2 who_PNQS hold_VV0 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 form_NN1 of_IO argument_NN1 on_II the_AT one_MC1 hand_NN1 and_CC those_DD2 who_PNQS claim_VV0 it_PPH1 is_VBZ an_AT1 aid_NN1 to_II perception_NN1 on_II the_AT other_JJ (_( 2006b_FO :_: 137_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
David_NP1 Velleman_NP1 describes_VVZ the_AT possibility_NN1 that_CST this_DD1 volatility_NN1 be_VBI explained_VVN by_II a_AT1 form_NN1 of_IO meta-desire_NN1 for_IF one_PN1 ,_, s_ZZ1 actions_VVZ to_TO "_" make_VVI sense_NN1 ,_, "_" the_AT desire_NN1 being_VBG to_TO accommodate_VVI one_PN1 ,_, s_ZZ1 behavior_NN1 in_II a_AT1 running_JJ narrative_NN1 of_IO the_AT self_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 critique_NN1 of_IO finalism_NN1 certainly_RR does_VDZ not_XX in_II any_DD way_NN1 exclude_VV0 necessary_JJ causality_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT '_NULL fortuitous_JJ encounters_NN2 '_NULL evoked_VVN by_II Spinoza_NP1 have_VH0 nothing_PN1 to_TO do_VDI with_IW an_AT1 absence_NN1 of_IO cause_NN1 ,_, with_IW an_AT1 essential_JJ chance_NN1 in_II the_AT sense_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 microphysics_NN1 of_IO quanta_NN1 ,_, but_CCB with_IW an_AT1 absence_NN1 of_IO finality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 difference_NN1 can_VM be_VBI brought_VVN out_RP by_II showing_VVG how_RGQ deeply_RR the_AT critical_JJ arguments_NN2 of_IO Frankfurt_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 essays_NN2 are_VBR rooted_VVN in_II the_AT philosophical_JJ concerns_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 long_RR nourished_VVN his_APPGE work_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II the_AT percentage_NN1 of_IO independent_JJ directors_NN2 gets_VVZ close_RR to_II and_CC exceeds_VVZ a_AT1 majority_NN1 ,_, investors_NN2 appear_VV0 more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO expect_VVI that_CST the_AT firm_NN1 has_VHZ sufficient_JJ restorative_JJ capacity_NN1 to_TO address_VVI the_AT systemic_JJ organizational_JJ causes_NN2 of_IO the_AT misconduct_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II such_DA ,_, religious_JJ beliefs_NN2 can_VM be_VBI important_JJ coping_NN1 devices_NN2 ,_, allowing_VVG people_NN to_TO adjust_VVI to_II major_JJ life_NN1 events_NN2 more_RGR easily_RR and_CC offering_VVG a_AT1 more_RGR stable_JJ view_NN1 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 ,_, so_RR reducing_VVG levels_NN2 of_IO stress_NN1 (_( Ellison_NP1 1991_MC ;_; George_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ true_JJ ,_, however_RR ,_, that_CST the_AT focus_NN1 on_II typological_JJ difference_NN1 can_VM not_XX alone_RR explain_VVI the_AT originality_NN1 of_IO the_AT study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO properly_RR understand_VVI the_AT Atomic_JJ View_NN1 ,_, some_DD clarifications_NN2 are_VBR needed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB the_AT principle_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI based_VVN on_II utilitarianism_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 turns_VVZ out_RP ,_, because_CS its_APPGE implementation_NN1 will_VM very_RG often_RR not_XX have_VHI the_AT best_JJT consequences_NN2 in_II utilitarian_JJ terms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Summing_VVG up_RP these_DD2 writings_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM find_VVI three_MC levels_NN2 of_IO meaning_NN1 :_: first_MD ,_, the_AT key_NN1 to_II governing_VVG a_AT1 country_NN1 is_VBZ in_II sincerely_RR and_CC faithfully_RR upholding_VVG the_AT "_" middle_JJ path_NN1 "_" ;_; second_MD ,_, using_VVG the_AT method_NN1 of_IO the_AT "_" Mean_NN1 "_" requires_VVZ first_MD grasping_VVG the_AT two_MC extremes_NN2 of_IO "_" excess_NN1 "_" and_CC "_" insufficiency_NN1 ,_, "_" then_RT acting_VVG on_II the_AT most_RGT fair_JJ and_CC suitable_JJ principle_NN1 ;_; third_MD ,_, the_AT objective_NN1 of_IO using_VVG the_AT "_" Mean_NN1 "_" is_VBZ to_TO follow_VVI the_AT needs_NN2 of_IO the_AT people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Analects_NP1 9.1_MC says_VVZ ,_, "_" The_AT Master_NN1 only_RR rarely_RR spoke_VVD about_II profit_NN1 (_( li_MC )_) ,_, the_AT decree_NN1 of_IO the_AT universe_NN1 (_( ming_VVG )_) ,_, and_CC benevolence_NN1 (_( ren_NN1 )_) ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Tromholt_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 photographic_JJ archive_NN1 of_IO about_RG 200_MC unique_JJ motives_NN2 (_( among_II them_PPHO2 50_MC portraits_NN2 )_) are_VBR now_RT kept_VVN in_II the_AT picture_NN1 collection_NN1 of_IO the_AT University_NN1 library_NN1 in_II Bergen_NP1 ,_, Norway_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 argue_VV0 that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ wrong_JJ :_: mathematics_NN1 is_VBZ committed_VVN to_II its_APPGE own_DA necessity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RGQV much_RR the_AT modalities_NN2 of_IO empire_NN1 have_VH0 changed_VVN today_RT ,_, this_DD1 insight_NN1 remains_VVZ ,_, I_PPIS1 think_VV0 ,_, as_RG valid_JJ as_CSA ever_RR ;_; and_CC still_RR under-theorised_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Promoting_VVG defeasible_JJ generalizations_NN2 to_II conceptual_JJ truths_NN2 risks_NN2 mistaking_VVG exceptions_NN2 for_IF impossibilities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, perhaps_RR the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 statue_NN1 ,_, S_ZZ1 ,_, has_VHZ a_AT1 certain_JJ mass_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ grounded_VVN and_CC explained_VVN by_RP ,_, and_CC also_RR identical_JJ to_TO ,_, the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 mereological_JJ fusion_NN1 ,_, F_ZZ1 has_VHZ that_DD1 mass_NN1 (_( because_CS ,_, say_VV0 ,_, S_ZZ1 is_VBZ F_ZZ1 )_) ;_; yet_RR S_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 mass_JJ doesn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 explain_VV0 F_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 mass_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT other_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO preserve_VVI its_APPGE own_DA social_JJ values_NN2 ,_, habits_NN2 and_CC above_II all_DB its_APPGE institutions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS this_DD1 argument_NN1 makes_VVZ sense_NN1 in_II theory_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM require_VVI what_DDQ strikes_VVZ us_PPIO2 as_II an_AT1 extremely_RR unlikely_JJ change_NN1 in_II practice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Accordingly_RR ,_, radiologists_NN2 challenged_VVD the_AT credentials_NN2 of_IO KM_NNU doctors_NN2 after_II the_AT latter_DA began_VVD using_VVG imaging_NN1 technology_NN1 ,_, contrasting_VVG their_APPGE shallow_JJ understanding_NN1 of_IO radiology_NN1 with_IW WM_NP1 doctors_NN2 '_NULL extensive_JJ training_NN1 in_II radiology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, generally_RR regarded_VVN as_II a_AT1 work_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 ,_, an_AT1 object_NN1 may_VM not_XX work_VVI as_II art_NN1 in_II certain_JJ situations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, Bermudez_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 conclusion_NN1 that_CST '_NULL the_AT multiple-objects_NN2 constraint_NN1 is_VBZ satisfied_VVN in_II all_DB instances_NN2 of_IO tactile_JJ somatic_JJ proprioception_NN1 '_NULL hides_VVZ an_AT1 artifice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 must_VM take_VVI a_AT1 position_NN1 to_TO ambush_VVI the_AT murderers_NN2 because_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR at_II a_AT1 disadvantage_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
V_ZZ1 if_CS pf_NNU (_( Ei_NP1 )_) <_FO V_ZZ1 ,_, where_CS V_ZZ1 can_VM be_VBI any_DD real_JJ number_NN1 so_CS21 that_CS22 0<_FO V<_FO 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ obvious_JJ from_II the_AT definition_NN1 of_IO -biactions_NN2 because_CS intersection_NN1 and_CC union_NN1 are_VBR associative_JJ and_CC commutative_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA a_AT1 procedure_NN1 can_VM be_VBI constructed_VVN in_II a_AT1 largely_RR formal_JJ manner_NN1 or_CC informally_RR ,_, using_VVG the_AT extant_JJ pragmatically-oriented_JJ dialectical_JJ approaches_NN2 as_II a_AT1 basic_JJ theoretical_JJ background_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT purposes_NN2 of_IO moral_JJ deliberation_NN1 ,_, God_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Lottery_NN1 and_CC these_DD2 devices_NN2 are_VBR on_II all_DB fours_MC2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT same_DA goes_VVZ for_IF Gravity_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Rainbow_NN1 ,_, just_RR in_II the_AT other_JJ direction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD of_IO what_DDQ they_PPHS2 record_VV0 is_VBZ taken_VVN up_RP as_II part_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 picture_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 representational_JJ content_NN1 ,_, some_DD is_VBZ left_VVN aside_RL ,_, and_CC some_DD unrecorded_JJ things_NN2 are_VBR added_VVN to_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Comparison_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ generally_RR agreed_VVN ,_, plays_VVZ a_AT1 fundamental_JJ role_NN1 in_II the_AT practice_NN1 and_CC in_II the_AT subject-matter_NN1 of_IO philosophy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, if_CS he_PPHS1 were_VBDR to_TO write_VVI the_AT review_NN1 ,_, things_NN2 would_VM also_RR be_VBI better_JJR than_CSN if_CS he_PPHS1 were_VBDR not_XX to_TO write_VVI the_AT review_NN1 ;_; actualism_NN1 therefore_RR also_RR implies_VVZ that_CST he_PPHS1 ought_VMK to_TO write_VVI the_AT review_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 think_VV0 the_AT standard_JJ reasoning_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ standard_JJ ,_, indicates_VVZ something_PN1 central_JJ about_II the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO indeterminacy_NN1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Apart_II21 from_II22 the_AT high-tech_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO war_NN1 ,_, of_IO which_DDQ the_AT us_PPIO2 was_VBDZ in_II charge_NN1 ,_, the_AT principal_JJ means_NN of_IO waging_VVG counterinsurgency_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO link_VVI the_AT civilian_JJ population_NN1 to_II the_AT armed_JJ forces_NN2 through_II intelligence_NN1 networks_NN2 and_CC paramilitary_JJ militias_NN2 ,_, as_CSA in_II Peru_NP1 ,_, Guatemala_NP1 ,_, and_CC El_NP1 Salvador_NP1 ;_; with_IW the_AT crucial_JJ difference_NN1 that_CST in_II Colombia_NP1 ,_, the_AT armed_JJ Right_NN1 exercised_VVN relative_JJ autonomy_NN1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 the_AT military_JJ by_II controlling_VVG the_AT country_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 most_RGT lucrative_JJ cocaine_NN1 export_NN1 routes_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 local_JJ and_CC regional_JJ office_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II this_DD1 dynamic_JJ intersection_NN1 ,_, collaborators_NN2 work_VV0 to_TO advance_VVI their_APPGE shared_JJ research_NN1 agendas_NN2 while_CS attending_VVG to_II the_AT construction_NN1 ,_, repair_VV0 ,_, and_CC sustenance_NN1 of_IO the_AT platform-at_II once_RR cognitive_JJ ,_, emotional_JJ ,_, and_CC interactive-that_DD1 makes_VVZ this_DD1 work_NN1 possible_JJ and_CC rewarding_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Likewise_RR ,_, creative_JJ artists_NN2 often_RR describe_VV0 their_APPGE aesthetic_JJ judgements_NN2 as_II a_AT1 response_NN1 to_II what_DDQ the_AT work_NN1 demands-how_RRQ the_AT story_NN1 must_VM unfold_VVI ,_, how_RRQ the_AT legato_JJ passage_NN1 must_VM be_VBI played_VVN ,_, just_RR which_DDQ colours_VVZ the_AT painting_NN1 requires_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 light_II32 of_II33 the_AT LIBOR_NP1 scandal_NN1 and_CC PPI_JJ mis-selling_NN1 ,_, amongst_II other_JJ issues_NN2 ,_, Barclays_NP1 '_NULL Chief_JJ Executive_NN1 Antony_NP1 Jenkins_NP1 decided_VVD to_TO waive_VVI the_AT bonus_NN1 payment_NN1 for_IF 2012_MC for_IF which_DDQ he_PPHS1 was_VBDZ eligible_JJ ,_, saying_VVG that_CST "_" I_PPIS1 think_VV0 it_PPH1 only_RR right_JJ that_CST I_PPIS1 bear_VV0 an_AT1 appropriate_JJ degree_NN1 of_IO accountability_NN1 for_IF those_DD2 matters_NN2 "_" (_( The_AT BBC_NP1 2013a_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Language_NN1 events_NN2 are_VBR connected_VVN to_II one_PPX121 another_PPX122 in_II many_DA2 different_JJ ways_NN2 :_: "_" There_EX are_VBR many_DA2 different_JJ kinds_NN2 of_IO affinity_NN1 between_II them_PPHO2 "_" (_( Wittgenstein_NP1 2009_MC :_: §65_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, to_II a_AT1 certain_JJ extent_NN1 one_PN1 might_VM think_VVI that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ appropriate_JJ that_CST the_AT debate_NN1 over_II inclusive_JJ fitness_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 debate_NN1 over_II methods_NN2 :_: although_CS we_PPIS2 can_VM use_VVI inclusive_JJ fitness_NN1 in_II the_AT highly_RR simplified_JJ models_NN2 of_IO evolutionary_JJ game_NN1 theory_NN1 ,_, in_II doing_VDG so_RR we_PPIS2 lose_VV0 some_DD of_IO the_AT main_JJ benefits_NN2 of_IO the_AT inclusive_JJ fitness_NN1 framework_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Freedom_NN1 as_CSA such_DA means_VVZ nothing_PN1 to_II them_PPHO2 ,_, but_CCB the_AT freedom_NN1 to_TO speak_VVI ,_, to_TO love_VVI ,_, to_TO buy_VVI and_CC to_TO sell_VVI requires_VVZ institutional_JJ structures_NN2 that_CST can_VM not_XX be_VBI determined_VVN a_JJ21 priori_JJ22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Maintaining_VVG a_AT1 boundary_NN1 between_II authentic_JJ queer_JJ subjectivity_NN1 and_CC religious_JJ experience_NN1 might_VM be_VBI viewed_VVN as_II the_AT product_NN1 of_IO the_AT liberal_JJ humanist_JJ assumptions_NN2 regarding_II knowledge_NN1 and_CC secular_JJ critique_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ should_VM give_VVI queer_JJ theorists_NN2 pause_VV0 to_TO critically_RR examine_VVI their_APPGE own_DA investments_NN2 in_II secularity_NN1 and_CC normative_JJ queer_JJ subjectivity_NN1 (_( cf._VV0 But_CCB if_CS carbon_NN1 markets_NN2 are_VBR '_NULL new_JJ sites_NN2 of_IO accumulation_NN1 '_NULL ,_, this_DD1 begs_VVZ the_AT question_NN1 of_IO the_AT relation_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 '_NULL commodities_NN2 '_NULL to_II value_NN1 :_: where_RRQ does_VDZ the_AT value_NN1 accumulated_VVN come_VV0 from_II ?_? 
</s>
<s>
If_CS two_MC groups_NN2 of_IO organisms_NN2 are_VBR separated_VVN by_II an_AT1 insurmountable_JJ geographic_JJ distance_NN1 or_CC some_DD other_JJ barrier_NN1 ,_, then_RT the_AT two_MC groups_NN2 might_VM not_XX share_VVI causal_JJ relations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_ZZ1 sports_NN2 retailer_NN1 in_II the_AT mall_NN1 wants_VVZ to_TO put_VVI in_II a_AT1 parkour_NN1 facility_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ financially_RR beyond_II his_APPGE or_CC her_APPGE reach_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 estate_NN1 of_IO merchants_NN2 intervenes_VVZ between_II the_AT producers_NN2 ,_, an_AT1 estate_NN1 which_DDQ buys_VVZ only_RR in_II order_NN1 to_TO sell_VVI ,_, and_CC sells_VVZ only_RR in_II order_NN1 to_TO buy_VVI again_RT ,_, aiming_VVG in_II this_DD1 operation_NN1 not_XX at_II the_AT possession_NN1 of_IO the_AT commodities_NN2 as_CSA products_NN2 but_CCB merely_RR at_II the_AT acquisition_NN1 of_IO exchange_NN1 value_NN1 as_II such_DA ,_, of_IO money_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO begin_VVI with_IW ,_, features_NN2 connected_VVN with_IW our_APPGE being_VBG evaluators_NN2 and_CC doers_NN2 work_VV0 against_II our_APPGE even_RR noticing_VVG the_AT goods_NN2 in_II our_APPGE present_JJ condition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 only_RR managed_VVD to_TO find_VVI and_CC interview_NN1 one_MC1 female_NN1 Taalibe_NP1 Baay_NP1 rapper_NN1 ,_, Deesse_NP1 Major_NP1 ,_, who_PNQS so_RG far_RR has_VHZ not_XX used_VVN her_APPGE rap_NN1 to_TO promote_VVI religious_JJ messages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR let_VV0 us_PPIO2 turn_VVI to_II consciousness_NN1 of_IO the_AT second_NNT1 act-the_AT lawful_JJ title_NN1 to_TO coerce_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD we_PPIS2 turn_VV0 to_II the_AT theoretical_JJ problems_NN2 with_IW political_JJ Ruism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO get_VVI us_PPIO2 to_TO shed_VVI our_APPGE arrogant_JJ dispositions_NN2 it_PPH1 applies_VVZ a_AT1 constructive_JJ skepticism_NN1 to_II whatever_DDQV it_PPH1 is_VBZ that_DD1 human_JJ beings_NN2 claim_VV0 to_TO know_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 have_VH0 given_VVN an_AT1 "_" internal_JJ "_" definition_NN1 of_IO GRM_NP1 logics_NN2 ,_, as_CSA logics_NN2 which_DDQ can_VM be_VBI presented_VVN according_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 particular_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO semantics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Buses_NN2 were_VBDR the_AT second_MD target_NN1 of_IO attacks_NN2 and_CC ,_, because_CS they_PPHS2 were_VBDR faster_JJR ,_, were_VBDR less_RGR likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI torched_VVN ,_, but_CCB could_VM not_XX escape_VVI the_AT stones_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA I_PPIS1 mentioned_VVD ,_, it_PPH1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 plausible_JJ ,_, on_II the_AT balance_NN1 of_IO evidence_NN1 I_PPIS1 presented_VVD ,_, that_CST RM_NP1 is_VBZ able_JK to_TO experience_VVI coherent_JJ objects_NN2 (_( from_II letters_NN2 to_II houses_NN2 )_) as_CSA moving_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 leaves_VVZ us_PPIO2 where_RRQ we_PPIS2 were_VBDR at_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO §3.2_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT interior_NN1 of_IO the_AT club_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 traditional_JJ ,_, classical_JJ theatre_NN1 ,_, used_VVN by_II Lynch_NP1 in_II a_AT1 lot_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE work_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 the_AT space_NN1 for_IF the_AT Lady_NN1 in_II the_AT Radiator_NN1 in_II Eraserhead_NP1 (_( 1976_MC )_) ,_, or_CC the_AT cinema_NN1 auditorium_NN1 that_CST Nikki_NP1 Grace/Susan_NP1 Blue_JJ (_( Laura_NP1 Dern_NP1 )_) walks_VVZ into_II in_II Inland_JJ Empire_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bolivia_NP1 ,_, Ethiopia_NP1 and_CC Nepal_NP1 illustrate_VV0 three_MC different_JJ ways_NN2 in_II which_DDQ countries_NN2 in_II three_MC continents_NN2 ended_VVD up_RP landlocked_VVD ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 three_MC possible_JJ solutions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II reconstructing_VVG historical_JJ settings_NN2 ,_, the_AT film_NN1 depicted_VVD a_AT1 search_NN1 for_IF American_JJ Dream_NN1 ,_, particularly_RR recapturing_VVG the_AT lives_NN2 of_IO Hungarian_JJ 1848_MC Revolution_NN1 veterans_NN2 in_II the_AT American_JJ Civil_JJ War_NN1 based_VVN on_II a_AT1 method_NN1 marked_VVN as_CSA "_" light_JJ editing_NN1 ,_, "_" which_DDQ alluded_VVD to_II the_AT silent_JJ film_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ ,_, for_IF Dretske_NP1 ,_, is_VBZ the_AT source_NN1 of_IO S_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 introspective_JJ knowledge_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ she_PPHS1 thinks_VVZ ?_? 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ actually_RR a_AT1 familiar_JJ phenomenon_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 should_VM hope_VVI that_CST we_PPIS2 will_VM have_VHI motives_NN2 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ unfitting_JJ to_TO have_VHI (_( e.g._REX unwarranted_JJ anger_NN1 towards_II one_PN1 if_CS that_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT only_JJ way_NN1 to_TO prevent_VVI an_AT1 evil_JJ demon_NN1 from_II killing_VVG five_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS scientists_NN2 might_VM agree_VVI that_CST the_AT domain_NN1 of_IO biology_NN1 is_VBZ concerned_JJ with_IW living_JJ organisms_NN2 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ no_AT general_JJ agreement_NN1 about_II the_AT mark_NN1 that_CST makes_VVZ something_PN1 a_AT1 living_JJ organism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Today_RT the_AT room_NN1 has_VHZ a_AT1 glass_NN1 divider_NN1 which_DDQ separates_VVZ the_AT women_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 room_NN1 from_II the_AT central_JJ room_NN1 with_IW the_AT graves_NN2 which_DDQ the_AT men_NN2 enter_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT ERC_NP1 does_VDZ not_XX hold_VVI in_RR21 general_RR22 in_II PoOT_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 final_JJ example_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT most_RGT extreme_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II Replacement_NN1 ,_, the_AT only_JJ requirement_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 domain_NN1 for_IF being_VBG used_VVN to_TO represent_VVI a_AT1 population_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 possible_JJ world_NN1 was_VBDZ that_DD1 of_IO size_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ best_JJT to_TO leave_VVI things_NN2 as_CSA they_PPHS2 are_VBR and_CC not_XX take_VV0 away_RL the_AT wrong_JJ lesson_NN1 from_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT rules_NN2 ensure_VV0 that_CST if<_FO is_VBZ the_AT case_NN1 then_RT and_CC are_VBR the_AT case_NN1 ;_; but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ left_JJ open_JJ that<_FO might_VM have_VHI other_JJ ,_, different_JJ immediate_JJ grounds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II using_VVG him_PPHO1 so_RR ,_, these_DD2 philosophers_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO neglect_VVI any_DD kind_NN1 of_IO deep_JJ investigation_NN1 into_II how_RRQ they_PPHS2 are_VBR interpreting_VVG the_AT character_NN1 of_IO Ivan_NP1 Karamazov_NP1 ,_, resulting_VVG in_II some_DD incredibly_RR superficial_JJ interpretations_NN2 of_IO Ivan_NP1 ,_, and_CC leading_VVG to_II misguided_JJ uses_NN2 of_IO him_PPHO1 in_II their_APPGE philosophical_JJ arguments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 think_VV0 that_CST this_DD1 point_NN1 is_VBZ further_RRR supported_VVN by_II the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST laughter_NN1 causes_VVZ amusement_NN1 ,_, both_RR in_II others_NN2 and_CC in_II ourselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT case_NN1 ,_, where_CS Student_NN1 provides_VVZ an_AT1 answer_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ interpreted_VVN as_II an_AT1 unacceptable_JJ ,_, Tutor_NN1 informs_VVZ Student_NN1 on_II this_DD1 fact_NN1 ,_, afterwards_RT T_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 actions_NN2 are_VBR analogous_JJ to_II (_( In3A_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 3_MC presents_VVZ the_AT same_DA top-15_MC title_NN1 phrases_NN2 in_II table/numerical_FU format_NN1 across_II four_MC decades_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 that_CST a_AT1 doctor_NN1 treats_VVZ a_AT1 dying_JJ cancer_NN1 patient_NN1 and_CC thereby_RR reduces_VVZ ,_, but_CCB does_VDZ not_XX eliminate_VVI ,_, the_AT patient_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 suffering_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, the_AT narrowing_NN1 :_: the_AT move_NN1 from_II (_( 1_MC1 )_) to_II (_( 2_MC )_) is_VBZ valid_JJ on_II only_RR some_DD views_NN2 of_IO moral_JJ psychology_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, on_II what_DDQ we_PPIS2 might_VM call_VVI "_" Representationalism_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 how_RGQ far_RR these_DD2 characterizations_NN2 of_IO the_AT nurturing_NN1 conditions_NN2 for_IF the_AT sprouts_NN2 depart_VV0 from_II the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO "_" normal_JJ "_" or_CC "_" default_NN1 "_" development_NN1 of_IO the_AT ethical_JJ stuff_NN1 in_II human_JJ nature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Approximations_NN2 and_CC idealizations_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 models_NN2 ,_, have_VH0 been_VBN getting_VVG a_AT1 lot_NN1 of_IO attention_NN1 in_II philosophy_NN1 of_IO science_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC ,_, when_CS we_PPIS2 turn_VV0 to_II the_AT second_MD reference_NN1 class_NN1 problem-the_AT question_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ to_TO characterize_VVI the_AT observer-we_PPIS2 should_VM likewise_RR reject_VVI the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 must_VM always_RR use_VVI the_AT most_RGT specific_JJ reference_NN1 class_NN1 available_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA we_PPIS2 have_VH0 seen_VVN ,_, in_II the_AT objectless_JJ category_NN1 theory_NN1 ,_, objects_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX acquire_VVI their_APPGE individuality_NN1 by_II definition_NN1 ,_, But_CCB this_DD1 is_VBZ problematic_JJ for_IF the_AT purposes_NN2 of_IO Jackson_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 argument_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 idea_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX new_JJ ,_, having_VHG been_VBN suggested_VVN by_II Martha_NP1 Nussbaum_NP1 ,_, Peter_NP1 Kivy_NP1 ,_, and_CC others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE best_JJT bet_NN1 in_II promoting_VVG the_AT good_JJ will_VM not_XX be_VBI constantly_RR to_TO have_VHI in_II direct_JJ view_NN1 the_AT goal_NN1 of_IO promoting_VVG the_AT overall_JJ good_JJ ,_, but_CCB instead_RR to_TO entrench_VVI ourselves_PPX2 in_II deep_JJ personal_JJ relationships_NN2 ,_, involving_VVG strongly_RR partial_JJ emotions_NN2 ,_, in_II strong_JJ commitment_NN1 to_II specific_JJ personal_JJ projects_NN2 ,_, and_CC in_RR21 general_RR22 patterns_NN2 of_IO thought_NN1 ,_, attention_NN1 and_CC emotional_JJ engagement_NN1 which_DDQ home_VV0 in_RP on_II particular_JJ goods_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Assuming_VVG that_CST she_PPHS1 is_VBZ right_JJ ,_, the_AT issue_NN1 then_RT is_VBZ that_DD1 of_IO a_AT1 proper_JJ argumentation_NN1 design_NN1 (_( Aakhus_NP1 &;_NULL Jackson_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC ;_; Jackson_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ we_PPIS2 find_VV0 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO identity_NN1 emerged_VVD in_II two_MC key_JJ spaces_NN2 in_II Western_NP1 ,_, liberal_JJ ,_, capitalist_JJ societies_NN2 -_- namely_REX ,_, in_II the_AT proliferation_NN1 of_IO new_JJ practices_NN2 and_CC norms_NN2 of_IO consumerism_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 now_RT refer_VV0 to_II as_II '_NULL the_AT consumer_NN1 society_NN1 '_NULL ,_, and_CC ,_, as_CSA just_RR referred_VVN to_II ,_, in_II a_AT1 series_NN of_IO new_JJ social_JJ movements_NN2 around_II gender_NN1 ,_, race_NN1 and_CC sexuality_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 now_RT refer_VV0 to_II as_CSA '_NULL identity_NN1 politics_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
B._NP1 Kant_NP1 also_RR has_VHZ a_AT1 way_NN1 to_TO show_VVI that_CST the_AT basic_JJ forces_NN2 between_II his_APPGE monads_NN2 are_VBR central_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II their_APPGE introduction_NN1 to_II this_DD1 special_JJ issue_NN1 ,_, the_AT editors_NN2 first_MD outline_VV0 the_AT overall_JJ thematic_JJ content_NN1 of_IO the_AT issue_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR too_RG ,_, I_PPIS1 am_VBM not_XX saying_VVG that_CST every_AT1 time_NNT1 an_AT1 agent_NN1 performs_VVZ a_AT1 communicative_JJ act_NN1 akin_JJ to_II the_AT ones_NN2 above_RL ,_, she_PPHS1 does_VDZ so_RR with_IW the_AT goal_NN1 of_IO evoking_VVG uptake_NN1 in_II mind_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 consequence_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 definition_NN1 that_CST will_VM matter_VVI is_VBZ that_CST it_PPH1 allows_VVZ what_DDQ (_( 1_MC1 )_) requires_VVZ ,_, namely_REX ,_, that_CST the_AT laws_NN2 are_VBR true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
N-tableaux_NN2 differ_VV0 from_II CL-tableaux_NN2 in_II three_MC ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Stillingfleet_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 subsequent_JJ pamphlet_NN1 expanded_VVD his_APPGE appeal_NN1 to_II Locke_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 premises_NN2 and_CC conclusions_NN2 to_TO support_VVI the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST Locke_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Essay_NN1 leads_VVZ to_II heresy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Any_DD time_NNT1 that_CST scientists_NN2 are_VBR led_VVN to_TO accept_VVI a_AT1 theory_NN1 that_CST posits_VVZ radically_RR different_JJ entities_NN2 ,_, or_CC attributes_VVZ radically_RR different_JJ properties_NN2 to_II the_AT entities_NN2 posited_VVD by_II the_AT accepted_JJ theory_NN1 ,_, continuity_NN1 is_VBZ disrupted_VVN ,_, and_CC Devitt_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 methodological_JJ defense_NN1 of_IO realism_NN1 is_VBZ undermined_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Depending_II21 on_II22 his_APPGE relation_NN1 with_IW B_ZZ1 ,_, A_ZZ1 can_VM try_VVI other_JJ ,_, more_RGR gentle_JJ or_CC less_RGR direct_JJ denunciations_NN2 of_IO B_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 misdirection_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 we_PPIS2 can_VM imagine_VVI something_PN1 in_II the_AT spirit_NN1 of_IO "_" A_ZZ1 :_: Oh_UH ,_, I_PPIS1 forgot_VVD about_II that_DD1 !_! 
</s>
<s>
Matter_VV0 and_CC production_NN1 are_VBR made_VVN monstrous_JJ ,_, invested_VVN with_IW the_AT qualities_NN2 of_IO romantic_JJ love_NN1 that_CST animate_VV0 the_AT otherwise_RR mortifying_VVG system_NN1 of_IO commodity_NN1 production_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Over_II the_AT centuries_NNT2 there_EX has_VHZ been_VBN much_DA1 disagreement_NN1 among_II Chinese_JJ as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 Western_JJ scholars_NN2 as_II21 to_II22 how_RRQ to_TO reproduce_VVI these_DD2 arrangements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT evidence_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 sort_NN1 of_IO dependence_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT novel_NN1 and_CC informative_JJ classification_NN1 of_IO entities_NN2 that_CST is_VBZ at_II the_AT heart_NN1 of_IO the_AT proof_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 thoughts_NN2 about_II photographs_NN2 carry_VV0 over_RP to_II pictures_NN2 more_RGR generally_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II recent_JJ years_NNT2 ,_, the_AT public_JJ sphere_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ represents_VVZ a_AT1 realm_NN1 in_II civil_JJ society_NN1 where_RRQ people_NN can_VM debate_VVI and_CC discuss_VVI a_AT1 range_NN1 of_IO issues_NN2 and_CC common_JJ concerns_NN2 important_JJ to_II them_PPHO2 ,_, has_VHZ become_VVN a_AT1 key_JJ area_NN1 for_IF research_NN1 in_II the_AT humanities_NN2 and_CC social_JJ sciences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Having_VHG said_VVN this_DD1 ,_, there_EX are_VBR philosophers_NN2 of_IO art_NN1 who_PNQS believe_VV0 that_CST developments_NN2 within_II contemporary_JJ art_NN1 undermine_VV0 this_DD1 disjunctive_JJ ontological_JJ proposal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA I_PPIS1 noted_VVD above_RL ,_, London_NP1 seems_VVZ especially_RR concerned_JJ to_TO assure_VVI people_NN that_CST their_APPGE '_NULL tax_NN1 dollars_NNU2 '_NULL advance_VV0 their_APPGE health_NN1 and_CC wellbeing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB is_VBZ the_AT transmitted_JJ version_NN1 later_RRR ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II both_DB2 cases_NN2 ,_, one_PN1 could_VM argue_VVI that_DD1 art_NN1 and_CC sport_NN1 operating_NN1 "_" bottom-up_NN1 "_" does_VDZ have_VHI something_PN1 pertinent_JJ to_TO say_VVI about_II ethical_JJ issues_NN2 ,_, that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX simply_RR a_AT1 puppet_NN1 or_CC pawn_NN1 in_II a_AT1 larger_JJR philosophical_JJ and_CC political_JJ super-structure_NN1 ,_, but_CCB at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 one_PN1 should_VM be_VBI advised_VVN not_XX to_TO idealize_VVI art_NN1 and_CC sport_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ speciation_NN1 by_II polyploidy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Trading_VVG algorithm_NN1 B_ZZ1 receives_VVZ this_DD1 message_NN1 and_CC responds_VVZ by_II sending_VVG a_AT1 marketable_JJ order_NN1 to_TO execute_VVI against_II A_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 limit_VV0 order_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II practice_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 mean_VV0 a_AT1 network_NN1 of_IO relations_NN2 within_II which_DDQ works_VVZ or_CC performances_NN2 are_VBR constituted_VVN as_CSA arts_NN2 of_IO one_MC1 kind_NN1 or_CC another_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Vogt_NP1 (_( 1997_MC )_) adds_VVZ the_AT moral_JJ and_CC social_JJ dimension_NN1 ,_, the_AT former_DA relating_VVG to_II acts_NN2 in_II the_AT private_JJ sphere_NN1 and_CC the_AT latter_DA to_II people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 state_NN1 of_IO being_VBG ,_, such_II21 as_II22 their_APPGE skin_NN1 colour_NN1 and_CC socialisation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 stop_VV0 a_AT1 pedestrian_NN1 and_CC ask_VV0 whether_CSW he_PPHS1 generally_RR likes_VVZ fashion_NN1 or_CC rock_NN1 music_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 might_VM answer_VVI "_" No_UH ,_, I_PPIS1 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 like_II it_PPH1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Toegye_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 li_MC does_VDZ not_XX mean_VVI a_AT1 movement_NN1 as_II a_AT1 phenomenon_NN1 ,_, but_CCB spontaneity_NN1 of_IO inherent_JJ morality_NN1 ,_, similar_JJ to_II Mencius_NP1 ,_, four_MC beginnings_NN2 ,_, thus_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ active_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS mRNA_NN1 tended_VVD to_TO remain_VVI concentrated_VVN in_II the_AT nucleus_NN1 (_( as_CSA would_VM be_VBI the_AT case_NN1 under_II an_AT1 assumption_NN1 of_IO stable_JJ or_CC decreasing_JJ entropy_NN1 )_) ,_, then_RT the_AT process_NN1 of_IO gene_NN1 expression_NN1 would_VM not_XX work_VVI and_CC could_VM not_XX work_VVI in_II reverse_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ,_, public_JJ debt_NN1 had_VHD become_VVN intertwined_VVN with_IW private_JJ finance_NN1 in_II a_AT1 radically_RR new_JJ way_NN1 ;_; so_RG much_DA1 so_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT state_NN1 had_VHD to_TO account_VVI for_IF its_APPGE financial_JJ management_NN1 to_II private_JJ markets_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ judged_VVD the_AT credit-worthiness_NN1 of_IO its_APPGE debt_NN1 (_( and_CC disciplined_JJ public_JJ finance_NN1 )_) by_II31 way_II32 of_II33 the_AT interest_NN1 rates_NN2 investors_NN2 demanded_VVN in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO purchase_VVI it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Avicenna_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reply_NN1 addresses_VVZ an_AT1 unstated_JJ key_JJ assumption_NN1 in_II the_AT objection_NN1 :_: the_AT opponent_NN1 is_VBZ tacitly_RR eliding_VVG the_AT distinction_NN1 between_II contexts_NN2 in_II which_DDQ there_EX may_VM be_VBI a_AT1 discrepancy_NN1 between_II metaphysical_JJ and_CC epistemic_JJ immediacy_NN1 and_CC contexts_NN2 in_II which_DDQ there_EX is_VBZ no_AT such_DA discrepancy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Confucius_NP1 ,_, a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO shame_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT possession_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 individual_JJ alone_JJ but_CCB is_VBZ practiced_VVN by_II individuals_NN2 within_II specific_JJ relationships_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Levi_NP1 did_VDD not_XX belong_VVI to_II '_NULL the_AT family_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 different_JJ ,_, highly_RR influential_JJ view_NN1 ,_, suggested_VVN by_II Rafaeli_NP1 (_( 1988_MC )_) ,_, interactivity_NN1 applies_VVZ first_MD and_CC foremost_JJT not_XX to_II communication_NN1 channels_NN2 or_CC technologies_NN2 ,_, but_CCB rather_RR to_II concrete_JJ communicative_JJ interactions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Notice_VV0 ,_, however_RR ,_, that_CST defenders_NN2 of_IO the_AT economic_JJ case_NN1 for_IF sweatshops_NN2 (_( including_II Powell_NP1 and_CC Zwolinski_NP1 )_) do_VD0 not_XX deny_VVI that_CST managers_NN2 possess_VV0 such_DA resources_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD biologists_NN2 maintain_VV0 that_CST a_AT1 species_NN '_NULL identity_NN1 also_RR depends_VVZ on_II the_AT entire_JJ life_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 species-its_APPGE entire_JJ historical_JJ path_NN1 (_( Wiley_NP1 1981_MC ;_; O_UH '_NULL Hara_NP1 1993_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC I_PPIS1 haven_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 stipulated_VVD enough_RR about_II the_AT case_NN1 to_TO settle_VVI what_DDQ these_DD2 quantities_NN2 are_VBR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Taylor_NP1 also_RR puts_VVZ much_DA1 emphasis_NN1 on_II the_AT preservation_NN1 of_IO identity_NN1 in_II characterizing_VVG integrity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT contrary_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR suggested_VVN that_CST boys_NN2 are_VBR in_II31 need_II32 of_II33 disciplining_VVG themselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 implies_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 text_NN1 is_VBZ oriented_VVN toward_II constant_JJ reinterpretations_NN2 rather_II21 than_II22 containing_VVG a_AT1 closed_JJ and_CC permanent_JJ meaning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Referring_VVG to_II the_AT canonical_JJ model_NN1 alone_RR could_VM be_VBI viewed_VVN as_CSA merely_RR describing_VVG or_CC predicting_VVG the_AT behavior_NN1 of_IO class_NN1 I_ZZ1 neurons_NN2 ,_, as_II31 opposed_II32 to_II33 explaining_VVG it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS used_VVN in_II screening_VVG for_IF anomalies_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 foetal_JJ Down_II '_NULL s_ZZ1 syndrome_NN1 ,_, the_AT aim_NN1 would_VM be_VBI reproductive_JJ choice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 you_PPY are_VBR obviously_RR not_XX wildly_RR guessing_VVG what_DDQ to_TO do_VDI ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 must_VM still_RR put_VVI forward_JJ reasons_NN2 as_II21 to_II22 why_RRQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 good_JJ explanation_NN1 ,_, and_CC test_VV0 whether_CSW we_PPIS2 or_CC anyone_PN1 else_RR ,_, can_VM come_VVI up_RP with_IW better_JJR reasons_NN2 for_IF a_AT1 better_JJR one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ clear_JJ to_II me_PPIO1 that_CST these_DD2 percepts_NN2 and_CC phenomena_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX have_VHI inherent_JJ aesthetic_JJ qualities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD part_NN1 of_IO the_AT argument_NN1 draws_VVZ on_II findings_NN2 in_II developmental_JJ psychology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, missing_VVG from_II this_DD1 scenario_NN1 are_VBR the_AT reasons_NN2 why_RRQ such_DA '_NULL distortions_NN2 '_NULL affect_VV0 Western_JJ Marxism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 might_VM then_RT ask_VVI how_RRQ we_PPIS2 are_VBR to_TO understand_VVI such_DA perceptual_JJ appearances_NN2 ,_, and_CC here_RL is_VBZ where_RRQ (_( B_ZZ1 )_) comes_VVZ in_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Perry_NP1 Anderson_NP1 remarks_VVZ ,_, the_AT developed_JJ bourgeois_JJ state_NN1 has_VHZ the_AT advantage_NN1 over_II Tsarism_NN1 of_IO the_AT greater_JJR elasticity_NN1 of_IO its_APPGE specifically_RR political_JJ structures_NN2 and_CC '_NULL the_AT greater_JJR discipline_NN1 and_CC loyalty_NN1 of_IO its_APPGE troops_NN2 and_CC police_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II bodily_JJ awareness_NN1 there_EX seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI no_AT singling_NN1 out_II21 of_II22 my_APPGE body_NN1 among_II other_JJ potential_JJ objects_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 mode_NN1 of_IO awareness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, since_CS the_AT 1970s_MC2 ,_, there_EX has_VHZ been_VBN a_AT1 veritable_JJ revolution_NN1 in_II the_AT way_NN1 originality_NN1 and_CC creativity_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN conceived_VVN by_II the_AT mainstream_JJ artworld_NN1 :_: a_AT1 radical_JJ change_NN1 in_II the_AT way_NN1 critics_NN2 ,_, theorists_NN2 ,_, and_CC historians_NN2 talk_VV0 about_II the_AT ways_NN2 artists_NN2 create_VV0 and_CC subsequently_RR ,_, how_RRQ viewers_NN2 experience_VV0 and_CC judge_VV0 art_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT choice_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX between_II alternatives_NN2 of_IO clear_JJ valuation_NN1 ,_, but_CCB between_II arguably_RR equal_JJ options_NN2 differentiated_VVN by_II what_DDQ the_AT artist_NN1 is_VBZ trying_VVG to_TO achieve_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT village_NN1 worthy_NN1 is_VBZ so_RG preoccupied_JJ with_IW self-interest_NN1 that_CST he_PPHS1 forgoes_VVZ his_APPGE predisposed_JJ capacities_NN2 of_IO ren_NN1 and_CC yi_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 argue_VV0 that_CST contemporary_JJ art_NN1 shares_NN2 with_IW earlier_JJR artistic_JJ trends_NN2 a_AT1 critical_JJ attitude_NN1 towards_II dominant_JJ narratives_NN2 but_CCB has_VHZ its_APPGE own_DA particular_JJ way_NN1 of_IO dealing_VVG with_IW time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, in_II this_DD1 model_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 correctly_RR capture_VV0 our_APPGE intuitions_NN2 for_IF the_AT story_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Not_XX the_AT notion_NN1 that_CST ideologies_NN2 operate_VV0 in_II a_AT1 '_NULL more_RGR or_CC less_RGR '_NULL conscious_JJ fashion_NN1 :_: that_DD1 notion_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 seen_VVN ,_, was_VBDZ with_IW Althusser_NN1 from_II the_AT beginning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ instructive_JJ of_IO how_RRQ the_AT practice_NN1 of_IO arbitration_NN1 can_VM be_VBI employed_VVN broadly_RR to_TO assure_VVI the_AT involved_JJ parties_NN2 that_CST there_EX are_VBR appropriate_JJ means_NN of_IO redress_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, some_DD basic_JJ information_NN1 is_VBZ needed_VVN to_TO make_VVI a_AT1 text_NN1 self-contained_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, an_AT1 inference_NN1 from_II data_NN about_II one_MC1 type_NN1 of_IO phenomenon_NN1 to_II another_DD1 type_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX inductive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM make_VVI little_DA1 sense_NN1 for_IF Aristotle_NP1 to_TO say_VVI that_CST a_AT1 human_JJ being_NN1 deliberately_RR achieved_VVN the_AT highest_JJT human_JJ end_NN1 (_( theoria_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ the_AT exercise_NN1 of_IO sophia_NN1 )_) without_IW having_VHG phronesis_NN1 (_( practical_JJ wisdom_NN1 )_) guiding_JJ that_CST person_NN1 toward_II that_DD1 end_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 are_VBR not_XX proprioceptively_RR aware_JJ of_IO our_APPGE body_NN1 from_II any_DD particular_JJ viewpoint_NN1 or_CC as_CSA standing_VVG in_II some_DD spatial_JJ relation_NN1 to_II ourselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, all_DB of_IO this_DD1 does_VDZ not_XX mean_VVI that_DD1 strategic_JJ thinking_NN1 was_VBDZ absent_JJ in_II Marx_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO represent_VVI an_AT1 agent_NN1 as_CSA authorized_VVN by_II the_AT UPR_NN1 to_TO perform_VVI an_AT1 action_NN1 (_( and_CC so_RR ,_, a_RR21 fortiori_RR22 ,_, to_II will_VM the_AT action_NN1 )_) is_VBZ to_TO represent_VVI the_AT agent_NN1 as_CSA authorized_VVN to_TO produce_VVI the_AT action_NN1 as_II an_AT1 effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 link_NN1 with_IW friendship_NN1 also_RR explains_VVZ why_RRQ networks_NN2 of_IO giving_VVG and_CC receiving_VVG may_VM partially_RR overlap_VVI with_IW both_RR practices_NN2 and_CC institutions_NN2 ,_, although_CS the_AT rationale_NN1 behind_II these_DD2 respective_JJ social_JJ relationships_NN2 differs_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, Kant_NP1 stresses_VVZ that_CST only_RR free_JJ and_CC open_JJ rational_JJ assessment_NN1 can_VM ensure_VVI that_CST our_APPGE respect_NN1 is_VBZ "_" sincere_JJ and_CC not_XX feigned_VVN &lsqb;_( nich_VV0 erheuchelt_NN1 &rsqb;_) "_" (_( 8_MC :_: 255_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ nevertheless_RR fair_JJ to_TO say_VVI that_CST the_AT above_JJ view_NN1 on_II the_AT fallacies_NN2 has_VHZ rather_RR not_XX had_VHN a_AT1 strong_JJ impact_NN1 on_II neighboring_VVG academic_JJ fields_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Every_AT1 aviator_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 born_JJ fascist_NN1 "_" (_( Esposito_NP1 2015_MC ,_, 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, as_CSA I_PPIS1 mentioned_VVD earlier_RRR ,_, people_NN seem_VV0 to_TO take_VVI normality_NN1 considerations_NN2 into_II account_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rule_NN1 D13_FO is_VBZ preserved_VVN because_CS if_CS O_ZZ1 attacks_VVZ a_AT1 P-statement_NN1 in_II the_AT diminished_JJ game_NN1 then_RT the_AT same_DA P-assertion_NN1 would_VM likewise_RR be_VBI attacked_VVN multiple_JJ times_NNT2 in_II the_AT original_JJ game_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT debunker_NN1 must_VM defend_VVI an_AT1 epistemic_JJ principle_NN1 that_CST bridges_VVZ the_AT gap_NN1 between_II the_AT debunker_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 evolutionary_JJ premises_NN2 and_CC skeptical_JJ conclusion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT insistence_NN1 on_II political_JJ representations_NN2 ruled_VVD out_RP the_AT possibility_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 social_JJ epiphany_NN1 that_CST could_VM settle_VVI the_AT problem_NN1 of_IO power_NN1 and_CC politics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF a_AT1 change_NN1 in_II my_APPGE stomachache_NN1 may_VM be_VBI due_II21 to_II22 swapping_VVG aspirin_NN for_IF Tylenol_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 changing_VVG my_APPGE wine_NN1 consumption_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Excavated_JJ texts_NN2 from_II Mawangdui_NP1 ,_, Guodian_JJ ,_, and_CC other_JJ tombs_NN2 have_VH0 generated_VVN a_AT1 good_JJ deal_NN1 of_IO excitement_NN1 in_II the_AT study_NN1 of_IO Chinese_JJ classics_NN2 in_II31 light_II32 of_II33 the_AT newly_RR available_JJ materials_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT commodity_NN1 of_IO linen_NN1 must_VM therefore_RR place_VVI itself_PPX1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 an_AT1 altogether_RR different_JJ commodity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, when_CS the_AT media_NN provides_VVZ ambiguous_JJ signals_NN2 ,_, investors_NN2 will_VM be_VBI less_RRR able_JK to_TO interpret_VVI the_AT information_NN1 ,_, leading_VVG to_II more_DAR heterogeneity_NN1 in_II responses_NN2 that_CST likely_RR diffuses_VVZ the_AT overall_JJ reaction_NN1 of_IO the_AT stock_NN1 market_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_RR21 usual_RR22 ,_, the_AT definition_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 truth-predicate_NN1 gives_VVZ rise_NN1 to_II corresponding_VVG '_NULL meaning-grounded_JJ '_NULL notions_NN2 ,_, as_CSA in_II the_AT informal_JJ idea_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 sentence_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 being_VBG '_NULL true_JJ by_II virtue_NN1 of_IO meaning_VVG alone_RR '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Insofar_CS21 as_CS22 emotions_NN2 find_VV0 their_APPGE way_NN1 into_II these_DD2 writings_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 do_VD0 so_RR largely_RR through_II narratives_NN2 about_II his_APPGE own_DA experience_NN1 as_II a_AT1 child_NN1 and_CC by_II introducing_VVG the_AT perspective_NN1 of_IO the_AT individual_JJ victim_NN1 of_IO injustice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Generally_RR speaking_VVG ,_, if_CS a_AT1 propositional_JJ language_NN1 contains_VVZ implication_NN1 →_NULL and_CC a_AT1 formula_NN1 p_ZZ1 →_NULL (_( q_ZZ1 →_NULL p_ZZ1 )_) is_VBZ derivable_JJ ,_, then_RT any_DD C-system_NN1 can_VM be_VBI converted_VVN into_II L-system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, according_II21 to_II22 OICO_NP1 ,_, if_CS an_AT1 agent_NN1 at_II a_AT1 given_JJ time_NNT1 has_VHZ a_AT1 conditional_JJ obligation_NN1 ,_, then_RT the_AT agent_NN1 at_II that_DD1 time_NNT1 can_VM satisfy_VVI any_DD unconditional_JJ counterpart_NN1 of_IO the_AT conditional_JJ obligation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ordinarily_RR ,_, generational_JJ replacement_NN1 provides_VVZ most_DAT of_IO the_AT new_JJ workers_NN2 needed_VVN to_TO replenish_VVI this_DD1 class_NN1 ,_, and_CC women_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 capacity_NN1 to_TO bear_VVI children_NN2 therefore_RR plays_VVZ a_AT1 critical_JJ role_NN1 in_II class_NN1 society_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 conceded_VVD that_CST the_AT relevant_JJ empirical_JJ work_NN1 undermines_VVZ commonsense_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Published_VVN in_II Italy_NP1 during_II the_AT 1970s_MC2 ,_, Factory_NN1 of_IO Strategy_NN1 reflects_VVZ discussion_NN1 and_CC debates_NN2 on_II the_AT Italian_JJ Left_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 time_NNT1 ,_, as_CSA activists_NN2 and_CC intellectuals_NN2 associated_VVN with_IW workerist_NN1 autonomist_NN1 currents_NN2 that_CST confronted_VVD ,_, and_CC sought_VVD to_TO forge_VVI a_AT1 dynamic_JJ left_JJ alternative_NN1 to_II ,_, an_AT1 increasingly_RR reformist_JJ mass_JJ Communist_JJ Party_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 respondents_NN2 '_NULL own_VV0 public_JJ welfare_NN1 beliefs_NN2 ,_, I_PPIS1 am_VBM interested_JJ in_II their_APPGE perceptions_NN2 of_IO what_DDQ their_APPGE engineering_NN1 programs_NN2 value_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 1-theory_JJ T_ZZ1 1_MC1 is_VBZ Quine_NN1 equivalent_NN1 to_II a_AT1 2-theory_JJ T_ZZ1 2_MC if_CS there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 reconstrual_JJ F_ZZ1 :_: 1_MC1 →_NULL 2_MC such_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT theories_NN2 F_ZZ1 (_( T_ZZ1 1_MC1 )_) and_CC T_ZZ1 2_MC are_VBR logically_RR equivalent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Part_NN1 II_MC takes_VVZ up_RP the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO liberation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II sum_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 hope_VV0 to_TO have_VHI established_VVN that_DD1 contra-classicality_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX too_RG far_RR away_RL if_CS we_PPIS2 are_VBR already_RR in_II the_AT realm_NN1 of_IO Belnap-Dunn_NP1 logic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 ,_, I_PPIS1 suggest_VV0 ,_, is_VBZ the_AT right_JJ way_NN1 to_TO think_VVI about_II the_AT formalization_NN1 of_IO semantic_JJ consistency_NN1 proofs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF conjunction_NN1 :_: Similar_JJ to_II the_AT case_NN1 for_IF disjunction_NN1 ,_, and_CC thus_RR we_PPIS2 leave_VV0 the_AT details_NN2 to_II the_AT reader_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB Burrow_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 argument_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT only_JJ one_PN1 levelled_VVD against_II the_AT aversarial_JJ context_NN1 of_IO philosophy_NN1 and_CC ,_, as_CSA Rooney_NP1 highlights_VVZ ,_, there_EX does_VDZ not_XX seem_VVI to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 reason_NN1 for_IF philosophy_NN1 to_TO be_VBI so_RG adversarial_JJ and_CC more_DAR than_CSN a_AT1 few_DA2 concerns_NN2 over_II it_PPH1 being_VBG so_RR (_( Rooney_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Pretheoretically_RR ,_, this_DD1 talk_NN1 appears_VVZ quite_RG literal_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD of_IO the_AT first_MD genre_NN1 paintings_NN2 from_II the_AT Sámi_JJ areas_NN2 were_VBDR produced_VVN in_II 1839-1840_MCMC ,_, just_RR after_II the_AT introduction_NN1 of_IO photography_NN1 by_II Fran_NP1 ?_? ois-Auguste_NP1 Biard_NP1 (_( 1798-1882_MCMC )_) ,_, an_AT1 artist_NN1 known_VVN to_TO have_VHI experimented_VVN with_IW the_AT new_JJ medium_NN1 (_( Barbara.1985,86_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, in_II quantum_NN1 mechanics_NN2 the_AT state_NN1 of_IO the_AT observed_JJ system_NN1 after_II a_AT1 measurement_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT relevant_JJ question_NN1 then_RT is_VBZ how_RRQ initial_JJ probabilities_NN2 change_VV0 over_RP the_AT course_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 observations_NN2 can_VM also_RR be_VBI brought_VVN to_TO bear_VVI on_II an_AT1 argument_NN1 ,_, due_II21 to_II22 Timothy_NP1 Williamson_NP1 ,_, that_DD1 purports_VVZ to_TO show_VVI the_AT necessity_NN1 of_IO distinctness_NN1 by_II appealing_VVG to_II standard_JJ axioms_NN2 governing_VVG the_AT actuality_NN1 operator_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ also_RR shown_VVN that_CST ,_, by_II adding_VVG extra_JJ variables_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 modification_NN1 to_II the_AT original_JJ HP_NN1 definition_NN1 made_VVD to_TO deal_VVI with_IW an_AT1 example_NN1 of_IO Hopkins_NP1 &;_NULL Pearl_NP1 (_( 2003_MC )_) may_VM not_XX be_VBI necessary_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, Shin_NN1 nowhere_RL explains_VVZ how_RRQ the_AT requirement_NN1 of_IO syntactical_JJ unique_JJ readability_NN1 of_IO symbolic_JJ sentences_NN2 could_VM be_VBI the_AT cause_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE not_XX allowing_VVG multiple_JJ readings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS it_PPH1 did_VDD not_XX lead_VVI to_II schisms_NN2 in_II other_JJ churches_NN2 ,_, most_DAT leaders_NN2 and_CC members_NN2 were_VBDR strongly_RR divided_VVN in_II their_APPGE attitude_NN1 to_II the_AT military_JJ regime_NN1 (_( source_NN1 :_: recorded_VVD Chile_NP1 fieldwork_NN1 interviews_NN2 1_MC1 ,_, 17_MC ,_, and_CC 26_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC be_VBI signatures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 obvious_JJ rejoinder_NN1 on_II Dickie_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 behalf_NN1 ,_, in_II31 keeping_II32 with_II33 the_AT thrust_NN1 of_IO his_APPGE original_JJ account_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 work_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 would_VM be_VBI to_TO revise_VVI the_AT new_JJ definition_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 in_II something_PN1 like_II this_DD1 way_NN1 :_: a_AT1 work_NN1 of_IO art_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 artifact_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 kind_NN1 created_VVN to_TO be_VBI presented_VVN to_II an_AT1 artworld_NN1 public_NN1 for_IF appreciation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT point_NN1 of_IO departure_NN1 should_VM be_VBI a_AT1 recognition_NN1 that_CST the_AT chemical_JJ profiles_NN2 of_IO metal_NN1 objects_NN2 are_VBR dynamic_JJ ,_, not_XX static_JJ ,_, and_CC that_DD1 ,_, given_VVN a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO other_JJ lines_NN2 of_IO archaeological_JJ evidence_NN1 ,_, repeated_VVD melting_NN1 ,_, mixing_VVG ,_, and_CC repurposing_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 common_JJ practice_NN1 "_" from_II the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO the_AT earliest_JJT use_NN1 of_IO metal_NN1 "_" (_( p._NNU 116_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW practice_NN1 ,_, the_AT need_NN1 for_IF these_DD2 instrumental_JJ adjuncts_NN2 (_( effort_NN1 ,_, deliberation_NN1 )_) diminishes_VVZ as_II a_AT1 consequence_NN1 of_IO enhanced_JJ efficacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT fact_NN1 that_CST revolutionary_JJ moments_NN2 are_VBR not_XX governed_VVN by_II a_AT1 transhistorical_JJ temporality_NN1 -_- of_IO the_AT '_NULL bad_JJ historicist_NN1 '_NULL sort_NN1 favoured_VVN by_II crudely_RR evolutionist_NN1 schemas_NN2 -_- does_VDZ not_XX sanction_VVI an_AT1 arbitrary_JJ leap_NN1 out_II21 of_II22 human_JJ historicity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Measured_VVN by_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT behavior_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO embarrassment_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX necessarily_RR caused_VVN by_II the_AT actions_NN2 of_IO oneself_PNX1 or_CC others_NN2 ,_, but_CCB chagrin_NN1 and_CC shame_NN1 are_VBR both_RR related_VVN to_II the_AT actions_NN2 of_IO the_AT interested_JJ party_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 would_VM give_VVI Abrams_NN2 and_CC Strevens_NN2 exactly_RR what_DDQ they_PPHS2 need_VV0 :_: It_PPH1 would_VM guarantee_VVI the_AT counterfactual_JJ robustness_NN1 of_IO the_AT facts_NN2 about_II frequencies_NN2 that_CST ground_VVD the_AT probabilities_NN2 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 would_VM do_VDI so_RR in_II a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST does_VDZ not_XX involve_VVI introducing_VVG a_AT1 new_JJ probability_NN1 distribution_NN1 over_II initial_JJ conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Generally_RR ,_, such_DA events_NN2 are_VBR not_XX believed_VVN to_TO warrant_VVI total_JJ focus_NN1 ,_, cheering_VVG ,_, or_CC agonizing_JJ ,_, yet_RR often_RR cause_VV0 us_PPIO2 to_TO focus_VVI ,_, cheer_VVI ,_, or_CC agonize_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_DAT engineers_NN2 have_VH0 some_DD perspective_NN1 on_II the_AT societal_JJ influence_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE work_NN1 ,_, as_CSA user_NN1 and_CC customer_NN1 needs_NN2 are_VBR integral_JJ parts_NN2 of_IO engineering_NN1 design_NN1 processes_NN2 (_( Nye_NP1 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II sum_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 do_VD0 not_XX think_VVI that_CST Rosenthal_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 objections_NN2 ,_, if_CS leveled_VVN against_II SR_NP1 and_CC SR+_FO ,_, are_VBR successful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB to_TO refer_VVI to_II the_AT (_( purported_JJ )_) historical_JJ isolation_NN1 of_IO the_AT "_" Chinese_JJ "_" and_CC "_" European_JJ "_" cultures_NN2 to_TO convey_VVI this_DD1 claim_NN1 is_VBZ paradoxical_JJ given_CS21 that_CS22 Buddhism_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN very_RG successfully_RR introduced_VVN to_II China_NP1 ,_, while_CS most_DAT of_IO the_AT classical_JJ texts_NN2 of_IO Buddhism_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN written_VVN in_II Indo-European_JJ languages_NN2 (_( Sanskrit_NP1 or_CC Pali_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ both_RR the_AT starting_NN1 point_NN1 for_IF political_JJ practice_NN1 and_CC the_AT foundation_NN1 for_IF building_VVG its_APPGE theoretical_JJ foundation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR BK_NP1 argues_VVZ against_II VAT_NN1 from_II a_AT1 premise_NN1 that_CST VAT_NN1 explicitly_RR rejects_VVZ :_: it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX hard_JJ to_TO see_VVI that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ unlikely_JJ to_TO produce_VVI much_DA1 progress_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT contrary_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ an_AT1 Indigenous_JJ claim_NN1 that_CST despite_II centuries_NNT2 of_IO theft_NN1 and_CC genocide_NN1 ,_, the_AT reciprocity_NN1 of_IO the_AT partnership_NN1 in_II the_AT relation_NN1 with_IW the_AT land_NN1 endures_VVZ ,_, and_CC indeed_RR can_VM not_XX be_VBI undone_VVN by_II time_NNT1 ,_, space_NN1 ,_, law_NN1 or_CC money_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ one_MC1 thing_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 moral_JJ theory_NN1 to_TO be_VBI indeterminate_JJ where_CS it_PPH1 says_VVZ we_PPIS2 can_VM not_XX have_VHI self-evident_JJ knowledge_NN1 ,_, as_CSA Ross_NP1 thought_VVD we_PPIS2 can_VM not_XX about_II conflicts_NN2 of_IO duty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 would_VM scarcely_RR be_VBI an_AT1 exaggeration_NN1 to_TO say_VVI that_CST Karl_NP1 Polanyi_NP1 was_VBDZ ,_, throughout_II his_APPGE life_NN1 ,_, engaged_VVN in_II conversation_NN1 ;_; sometimes_RT amicably_RR ,_, sometimes_RT acrimoniously_RR ;_; with_IW Marx_NP1 and_CC the_AT Marxist_JJ tradition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II stark_JJ opposition_NN1 to_II the_AT way_NN1 that_CST Poulantzas_NP1 has_VHZ been_VBN appropriated_VVN here_RL ,_, Robinson_NP1 takes_VVZ transnationalisation_NN1 to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 process_NN1 where_CS the_AT national_JJ state_NN1 becomes_VVZ less_DAR and_CC less_RGR powerful_JJ as_CSA it_PPH1 becomes_VVZ increasingly_RR replaced_VVN by_II a_AT1 new_JJ ,_, super-national_JJ ,_, spatial_JJ and_CC institutional_JJ reality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 approach_NN1 has_VHZ led_VVN to_II Palestine_NP1 activists_NN2 and_CC students_NN2 expressing_VVG an_AT1 interest_NN1 in_II the_AT question_NN1 being_VBG referred_VVN to_II the_AT authorities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM suggest_VVI that_CST the_AT presumption_NN1 of_IO primitive_JJ modal_JJ facts_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ I_PPIS1 will_VM call_VVI counterfacts_NN2 ,_, that_CST serve_VV0 as_CSA truth-makers_NN2 for_IF counterfactual_JJ claims_NN2 ,_, offers_VVZ a_AT1 plausible_JJ response_NN1 to_II counterfactual_JJ skepticism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Others_NN2 may_VM allow_VVI tacit_JJ acceptance_NN1 but_CCB disagree_VV0 about_II what_DDQ is_VBZ required_VVN for_IF it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Heidegger_VV0 '_NULL s_ZZ1 answer_VV0 to_II this_DD1 question_NN1 ,_, as_CSA explained_VVN above_RL ,_, may_VM also_RR be_VBI considered_VVN a_AT1 typical_JJ Heideggerian_JJ response_NN1 to_II Kant_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 problem_NN1 of_IO "_" thing-in-itself_PPX1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT NWT_NP1 is_VBZ one_MC1 of_IO three_MC Canadian_JJ Territories_NN2 in_II the_AT Sub-arctic_JJ and_CC Arctic_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ significant_JJ that_CST the_AT causal_JJ will_NN1 powers_NN2 are_VBR powers_NN2 of_IO agents_NN2 specifically_RR :_: not_XX of_IO their_APPGE limbs_NN2 or_CC their_APPGE molecules_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 even_RR larger_JJR loophole_NN1 has_VHZ the_AT result_NN1 that_CST NIPA_NP1 data_NN have_VH0 only_RR limited_VVN coverage_NN1 of_IO the_AT profits_NN2 which_DDQ US_NP1 companies_NN2 make_VV0 from_II their_APPGE overseas_JJ operations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 though_CS22 (_( C_ZZ1 →_NULL Z_ZZ1 )_) is_VBZ true_JJ and_CC &lsqb;_( free_JJ creature_NN1 &rsqb;_) AA_NP1 is_VBZ in_II C_NP1 ,_, AC_NN1 ,_, A_ZZ1 still_RR is_VBZ able_JK to_TO do_VDI (_( Z_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_RRQ is_VBZ trust_NN1 versus_II active_JJ skepticism_NN1 of_IO scientific_JJ claims_NN2 about_II nature_NN1 warranted_VVN or_CC appropriate_JJ ?_? 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, both_RR Abrams_VVZ and_CC Strevens_NN2 agree_VV0 that_CST this_DD1 frequency_NN1 distribution_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI the_AT whole_JJ story_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ plausibly_RR of_IO value_NN1 to_TO be_VBI partially_RR oriented_VVN towards_II some_DD outcomes_NN2 rather_II21 than_II22 others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF these_DD2 reasons_NN2 I_PPIS1 find_VV0 myself_PPX1 having_VHG happily_RR shared_VVN the_AT same_DA trail_NN1 for_IF many_DA2 a_AT1 mile_NNU1 with_IW the_AT pragmatist_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 can_VM set_VVI aside_RL our_APPGE interest_NN1 in_II their_APPGE philosophical_JJ merits_NN2 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO submit_VVI them_PPHO2 to_II aesthetic_JJ analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 can_VM discuss_VVI the_AT Analects_NN2 '_NULL and_CC the_AT Mencius_NP1 '_NULL reflections_NN2 about_II emotions_NN2 by_II examining_VVG findings_NN2 in_II psychology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Today_RT imperialism_NN1 reproduces_VVZ ,_, Winant_NP1 writes_VVZ ,_, '_NULL a_AT1 worldwide_JJ pattern_NN1 of_IO employment_NN1 discrimination_NN1 ,_, violence_NN1 ,_, morbidity_NN1 ,_, impoverishment_NN1 ,_, pollution_NN1 ,_, and_CC unequal_JJ exchange_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II her_APPGE review_NN1 of_IO Jeffrey_NP1 Kripal_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 book_NN1 ,_, Esalen_NP1 :_: America_NP1 and_CC the_AT Religion_NN1 of_IO No_AT Religion_NN1 (_( Kripal_NP1 2007_MC )_) ,_, Marion_NP1 Goldman_NP1 (_( 2007_MC :_: 427_MC )_) describes_VVZ Esalen_NN1 as_II "_" a_AT1 retreat_NN1 center_NN1 ,_, spa_NN1 ,_, arcane_JJ think_NN1 tank_NN1 ,_, and_CC small_JJ intentional_JJ community_NN1 on_II the_AT central_JJ California_NP1 coast_NN1 ,_, overlooking_VVG rugged_JJ cliffs_NN2 at_II Big_JJ Sur_NP1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Importance_NN1 of_IO faith_NN1 was_VBDZ collapsed_VVN into_II three_MC responses_NN2 where_CS 1_MC1 ?_? =_FO ?_? '_NULL 
</s>
<s>
Not_XX important_JJ at_II all/Not_FU very_RG important_JJ '_NULL ,_, 2_MC ?_? =_FO ?_? '_NULL 
</s>
<s>
Somewhat_RR important_JJ '_NULL ,_, and_CC 3_MC ?_? =_FO ?_? '_NULL 
</s>
<s>
Very_JJ important/Extremely_FU important_JJ '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS this_DD1 risk_NN1 may_VM be_VBI worth_II taking_VVG ,_, sometimes_RT more_DAR caution_NN1 would_VM be_VBI advisable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II response_NN1 ,_, alQarf_NN1 clarified_VVD that_CST these_DD2 views_NN2 were_VBDR expressed_VVN by_II specialists_NN2 in_II human_JJ anatomical_JJ dissection_NN1 (_( musharri_NN2 ?_? n_ZZ1 )_) who_PNQS dissected_VVD the_AT pregnant_JJ women_NN2 that_CST had_VHD been_VBN sentenced_VVN to_II death_NN1 ,_, and_CC cut_VV0 their_APPGE bellies_NN2 open_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Among_II other_JJ things_NN2 ,_, this_DD1 allows_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_TO re-visit_VVI one_MC1 of_IO the_AT core_NN1 ideas_NN2 of_IO logic_NN1 since_CS antiquity_NN1 :_: that_DD1 to_TO define_VVI a_AT1 property_NN1 (_( or_CC concept_NN1 )_) is_VBZ to_TO define_VVI a_AT1 feature_NN1 common_JJ to_II a_AT1 multitude_NN1 of_IO objects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT result_NN1 of_IO metaphysical_JJ deliberation_NN1 ,_, but_CCB of_IO making_VVG use_NN1 of_IO irreducibly_RR first-personal_JJ information_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC it_PPH1 is_VBZ that_DD1 experience_NN1 which_DDQ appears_VVZ as_II the_AT germ_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 new_JJ humanity_NN1 ,_, of_IO a_AT1 new_JJ form_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ and_CC collective_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, from_II the_AT point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 of_IO the_AT MSRP_NP1 the_AT two_MC programs_NN2 have_VH0 not_XX contributed_VVN to_II the_AT growth_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 thus_RR may_VM be_VBI suggested_VVN that_DD1 fixity_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO degree_NN1 (_( Kuhn_NP1 ,_, 1981_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 establishes_VVZ that_CST the_AT left-to-right_JJ direction_NN1 of_IO (_( 22_MC )_) is_VBZ true_JJ at_II all_DB the_AT closest_JJT A1-worlds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS recognising_VVG that_CST a_AT1 better_JJR historical_JJ materialism_NN1 along_II these_DD2 lines_NN2 will_VM not_XX necessarily_RR provide_VVI us_PPIO2 with_IW a_AT1 gps_NNU route_NN1 to_II a_AT1 socialist_JJ world_NN1 beyond_II capitalism_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 does_VDZ suggest_VVI a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO guidelines_NN2 for_IF socialist_JJ strategy_NN1 ,_, with_IW which_DDQ the_AT lecture_NN1 concludes_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 article_NN1 I_PPIS1 provide_VV0 an_AT1 alternative_JJ approach_NN1 to_II explaining_VVG the_AT same_DA moral_JJ phenomena_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC as_CSA with_IW the_AT capitalism_NN1 Marx_NP1 analysed_VVD in_II his_APPGE own_DA time_NNT1 ,_, it_PPH1 also_RR comes_VVZ today_RT with_IW dispossession_NN1 and_CC dislocation_NN1 ,_, exploitation_NN1 and_CC inequality_NN1 ,_, contradiction_NN1 and_CC conflict_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Neo-Confucian_JJ cosmology_NN1 is_VBZ rooted_VVN in_II the_AT Book_NN1 of_IO Changes_NN2 ,_, I_PPIS1 provide_VV0 an_AT1 ecological_JJ interpretation_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 classic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD of_IO the_AT tests_NN2 control_VV0 the_AT general_JJ behaviour_NN1 of_IO the_AT system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT time_NNT1 fixed_VVN for_IF "_" Spot_NN1 barked_VVD "_" does_VDZ not_XX change_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA shown_VVN in_II the_AT discussion_NN1 under_II figure_NN1 1_MC1 ,_, the_AT discussion_NN1 is_VBZ meant_VVN to_TO show_VVI that_CST perhaps_RR there_EX is_VBZ nothing_PN1 wrong_JJ with_IW the_AT argument_NN1 from_II R2_FO '_NULL s_ZZ1 point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 study_NN1 of_IO the_AT self-presentations_NN2 of_IO the_AT Finnish_JJ archaeologist_NN1 ,_, Juhani_NP1 Rinne_NP1 ,_, Visa_NN1 Immonen_NN1 demonstrates_VVZ how_RRQ the_AT photographs_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 prominent_JJ academic_JJ ,_, in_II resonance_NN1 with_IW discourses_NN2 of_IO civilized_JJ men_NN2 ,_, particularly_RR drew_VVD attention_NN1 to_II Rinne_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 body_NN1 at_II work_NN1 (_( Immonen_NP1 2012_MC ,_, 37-52_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Shostakovich_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Tenth_MD Symphony_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 work_NN1 at_II the_AT heart_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE dispute_NN1 with_IW Kivy_NP1 ,_, lies_VVZ at_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 150-year_NNT1 course_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 far_RG more_RGR recent_JJ paper_NN1 A.J._NP1 Kreider_NP1 (_( 2016_MC )_) discusses_VVZ the_AT argumentum_NN1 ad_NN1 ignorantiam_NN1 as_II a_AT1 case_NN1 of_IO abductive_JJ reasoning_NN1 :_: that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, as_CSA inference_NN1 to_II the_AT best_JJT explanation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT very_JJ fact_NN1 that_CST yi_NNU or_CC rightness_NN1 is_VBZ rightness_NN1 in_II a_AT1 particular_JJ context_NN1 and_CC can_VM never_RR be_VBI fully_RR captured_VVN by_II a_AT1 general_JJ rule_NN1 (_( Analects_NP1 4.10_MC )_) guarantees_VVZ significant_JJ novelty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ to_TO say_VVI that_DD1 Heidegger_NN1 ,_, throughout_II his_APPGE works_NN ,_, was_VBDZ concerned_JJ with_IW that_DD1 which_DDQ is_VBZ meaningful_JJ and_CC intelligible_JJ to_II the_AT human_JJ subject_NN1 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 any_DD sense_NN1 of_IO objectivism_NN1 or_CC realism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 thus_RR defend_VV0 a_AT1 view_NN1 of_IO music_NN1 according_II21 to_II22 which_DDQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ (_( roughly_RR )_) events_NN2 either_RR intended_VVN to_TO have_VHI features_NN2 that_CST trigger_VV0 these_DD2 cognitive_JJ capacities_NN2 (_( such_II21 as_II22 pitch_NN1 or_CC rhythm_NN1 )_) or_CC intended_VVD to_TO be_VBI listened_VVN to_II for_IF such_DA features_NN2 ,_, whether_CSW31 or_CSW32 not_CSW33 they_PPHS2 are_VBR present_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ based_VVN on_II a_AT1 trade-off_NN1 between_II the_AT advantage_NN1 of_IO calling_VVG a_AT1 viable_JJ scientific_JJ claim_NN1 empirically_RR well_RR established_VVN and_CC the_AT potential_JJ damage_NN1 of_IO endorsing_VVG a_AT1 false_JJ scientific_JJ claim_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 proper_JJ understanding_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ the_AT ordinary_JJ concepts_NN2 we_PPIS2 use_VV0 in_II everyday_JJ life_NN1 came_VVD to_TO be_VBI formed_VVN is_VBZ important_JJ for_IF the_AT question_NN1 as_II21 to_II22 whether_CSW31 or_CSW32 not_CSW33 it_PPH1 makes_VVZ sense_NN1 to_TO speak_VVI of_IO something_PN1 called_VVN "_" an_AT1 absolute_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
L1_FO is_VBZ the_AT same_DA of_IO that_DD1 of_IO standard_JJ first-order_JJ logic_NN1 but_CCB augmented_VVD with_IW the_AT customary_JJ modal_JJ operator_NN1 ,_, "_" (_( "_" ,_, expressing_VVG the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO necessity_NN1 ,_, together_RL with_IW the_AT corresponding_JJ formation_NN1 rule_NN1 :_: if_CS ?_? is_VBZ a_AT1 formula_NN1 ,_, so_RR is_VBZ (_( ?_? ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD story_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 parallel_JJ story_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 story_NN1 about_II our_APPGE social_JJ science_NN1 scholarship_NN1 about_II gender_NN1 and_CC religion_NN1 ,_, at_RR21 least_RR22 in_II the_AT context_NN1 of_IO the_AT disciplines_NN2 we_PPIS2 represent_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, she_PPHS1 is_VBZ not_XX within_II her_APPGE rights_NN2 to_TO lock_VVI me_PPIO1 in_II her_APPGE house_NN1 and_CC prevent_VVI me_PPIO1 from_II exiting_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT lack_NN1 of_IO consensus_NN1 concerns_VVZ a_AT1 much_RR more_RGR fundamental_JJ metaphysical_JJ issue_NN1 :_: whether_CSW the_AT Xunantunich_NN1 believe_VV0 that_CST God_NP1 exists_VVZ ,_, that_CST gods_NN2 exist_VV0 ,_, the_AT natural_JJ world_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 god_NN1 ,_, that_CST each_DD1 part_NN1 of_IO the_AT natural_JJ world_NN1 is_VBZ god_NN1 ,_, or_CC that_CST there_EX are_VBR no_AT supernatural_JJ beings_NN2 whatsoever_DDQV ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ what_DDQ I_PPIS1 refer_VV0 to_II as_II the_AT creative_JJ of_IO the_AT hermeneutic_JJ for_IF it_PPH1 is_VBZ only_RR through_II such_DA a_AT1 creative_JJ effort_NN1 of_IO the_AT individual_JJ being_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI ontologically_RR different_JJ and_CC conscientiously_RR independent_JJ from_II the_AT Being_VBG which_DDQ has_VHZ determined_VVN and_CC made_VVN its_APPGE life_NN1 possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE behavior_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX represent_VVI what_DDQ they_PPHS2 actually_RR feel_VV0 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 does_VDZ represent_VVI what_DDQ they_PPHS2 both_RR ,_, if_CS they_PPHS2 have_VH0 good_JJ wills_NN2 ,_, know_VV0 that_CST they_PPHS2 are_VBR rationally_RR required_VVN to_TO endorse_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ruling_NN1 the_AT state_NN1 well_NN1 is_VBZ like_II tuning_VVG a_AT1 lute_NN1 :_: when_RRQ the_AT large_JJ strings_NN2 are_VBR too_RG tight_RR ,_, the_AT small_JJ string_NN1 break_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 might_VM be_VBI thought_VVN that_CST the_AT idea_NN1 of_IO conscious_JJ control_NN1 of_IO emotions_NN2 runs_VVZ into_II difficulty_NN1 within_II the_AT framework_NN1 of_IO Confucian_JJ self-cultivation_NN1 because_CS the_AT Confucian_JJ ideal_NN1 includes_VVZ not_XX just_RR the_AT self-watchfulness_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ required_VVN for_IF cognitive_JJ control_NN1 but_CCB also_RR the_AT ability_NN1 to_II freely_RR and_CC spontaneously_RR act_VV0 from_II the_AT correct_JJ emotions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA interventions_NN2 are_VBR unending_JJ yet_RR always_RR incomplete_JJ ;_; indeed_RR ,_, as_CSA Pierre_NP1 Macherey_NP1 once_RR contended_VVN ,_, Marxism_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 '_NULL finished_JJ theory_NN1 ,_, with_IW its_APPGE system_NN1 of_IO prepared_JJ responses_NN2 and_CC fossilised_JJ concepts_NN2 '_NULL but_CCB is_VBZ instead_RR a_AT1 '_NULL knot_NN1 of_IO simple_JJ and_CC concrete_JJ problems_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 has_VHZ definite_JJ repercussions_NN2 for_IF encounters_NN2 with_IW philosophies_NN2 that_CST are_VBR other_II21 than_II22 Western_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Instead_RR my_APPGE purpose_NN1 in_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO introduce_VVI ,_, motivate_VV0 and_CC go_VVI some_DD way_NN1 toward_II answering_VVG a_AT1 new_JJ ,_, third_MD question_NN1 about_II indeterminacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II the_AT international_JJ relations_NN2 theorist_NN1 Jack_NP1 Donnelly_NP1 points_VVZ out_RP ,_, "_" Kennan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 '_NULL necessity_NN1 '_NULL is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO physical_JJ compulsion_NN1 or_CC impossibility_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. In_II recent_JJ years_NNT2 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX uncommon_JJ to_TO hear_VVI Senegalese_NN say_VVI that_DD1 '_NULL Baay_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT spiritual_JJ leader_NN1 of_IO the_AT rappers_NN2 '_NULL (_( Hill_NP1 2016a_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Hardin_NP1 ,_, to_TO trust_VVI someone_PN1 is_VBZ to_TO take_VVI them_PPHO2 to_TO have_VHI encapsulated_VVN your_APPGE interests_NN2 amongst_II their_APPGE own_DA ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE proposed_JJ remedy_NN1 is_VBZ either_RR the_AT outright_JJ legal_JJ abolition_NN1 of_IO the_AT death_NN1 penalty_NN1 or_CC its_APPGE de_JJ21 facto_JJ22 suspension_NN1 (_( a_AT1 "_" permanent_JJ moratorium_NN1 ,_, "_" so_RR to_TO speak_VVI )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT "_" Inward_JJ Training_NN1 "_" (_( Nei_NP1 ye_PPY )_) chapter_NN1 of_IO the_AT Guanzi_NN1 says_VVZ :_: "_" The_AT essence_NN1 (_( qi_NN2 )_) of_IO the_AT myriad_NN1 things_NN2 is_VBZ what_DDQ gives_VVZ life_NN1 :_: below_RL ,_, it_PPH1 gives_VVZ life_NN1 to_II the_AT five_MC grains_NN2 ;_; above_RL ,_, it_PPH1 creates_VVZ ranked_JJ stars_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT other_JJ cases_NN2 are_VBR handled_VVN similarly_RR to_II those_DD2 in_II Lemma_NN1 6.3_MC of_IO &lsqb;_( 21_MC &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 offers_VVZ a_AT1 spirited_JJ defense_NN1 of_IO open_JJ access_NN1 to_II positions_NN2 :_: "_" For_IF it_PPH1 may_VM be_VBI possible_JJ to_TO improve_VVI everyone_PN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 situation_NN1 by_II assigning_VVG certain_JJ powers_NN2 and_CC benefits_NN2 to_II positions_NN2 despite_II the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST certain_JJ groups_NN2 are_VBR excluded_VVN from_II them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. Yet_RR we_PPIS2 now_RT know_VV0 that_CST the_AT technical_JJ aid_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 credit_NN1 unions_NN2 or_CC anti-malaria_JJ bed_NN1 nets_NN2 ,_, can_VM shore_VVI up_RP repressive_JJ regimes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Through_II the_AT influence_NN1 of_IO Pletho_NP1 ,_, seminal_JJ writings_NN2 of_IO Plato_NP1 and_CC Neoplatonic_JJ texts_NN2 were_VBDR transmitted_VVN to_II the_AT West_ND1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT mainstream_JJ view_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI ,_, roughly_RR ,_, that_CST a_AT1 present_JJ person_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 future_NN1 being_VBG that_DD1 can_VM remember_VVI experiences_NN2 of_IO the_AT present_JJ person_NN1 and_CC that_DD1 inherits_VVZ a_AT1 significant_JJ range_NN1 of_IO psychological_JJ features_NN2 from_II the_AT present_JJ person_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 certain_JJ beliefs_NN2 ,_, desires_NN2 ,_, and_CC character_NN1 traits_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT property_NN1 theory_NN1 of_IO musical_JJ works_NN says_VVZ that_CST each_DD1 musical_JJ work_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 property_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ instantiated_VVN by_II its_APPGE occurrences_NN2 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, the_AT work_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 performances_NN2 and_CC playings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT current_JJ situation_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 completely_RR dependent_JJ judiciary_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 should_VM seek_VVI judicial_JJ checks_NN2 and_CC balances_NN2 and_CC use_VVI the_AT judiciary_NN1 as_II a_AT1 mechanism_NN1 of_IO checks_NN2 and_CC balance_NN1 against_II the_AT local_JJ party_NN1 and_CC government_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 further_RRR that_DD1 God_NN1 knows_VVZ that_CST q_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS God_NP1 knows_VVZ all_DB things_NN2 that_CST are_VBR possibly_RR known_VVN ,_, God_NP1 knows_VVZ (_( q_ZZ1 v_ZZ1 p_ZZ1 )_) and_CC ,_, when_CS conjoined_VVN with_IW q_ZZ1 ,_, God_NP1 knows_VVZ p_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recall_VV0 again_RT that_CST p_ZZ1 is_VBZ some_DD future_JJ free_JJ action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT exemplar_JJ theory_NN1 argues_VVZ that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ a_AT1 body_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 about_II the_AT properties_NN2 of_IO individual_JJ members_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 class_NN1 (_( Medin_NP1 and_CC Schaffer_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1978_MC &rsqb;_) ;_; Nosofsky_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1986_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 non-courtroom_JJ variant_NN1 of_IO (_( 2_MC )_) is_VBZ (_( 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO describe_VVI the_AT state_NN1 of_IO contact-force_JJ transmission_NN1 at_II a_AT1 point_NN1 inside_II the_AT body_NN1 ,_, continuum_NN1 mechanics_NN2 uses_VVZ the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO stress_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 argue_VV0 that_CST ,_, for_IF Kant_NP1 ,_, music_NN1 can_VM be_VBI experienced_VVN as_CSA either_RR agreeable_JJ or_CC beautiful_JJ depending_II21 on_II22 the_AT attitude_NN1 we_PPIS2 take_VV0 toward_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 Biyanlu_NP1 case_NN1 45_MC ,_, when_CS asked_VVN what_DDQ the_AT one_PN1 ,_, to_II which_DDQ the_AT myriad_NN1 things_NN2 return_VV0 ,_, does_VDZ itself_PPX1 return_VVI to_II ,_, Zhaozhou_NP1 said_VVD ,_, "_" I_PPIS1 made_VVD a_AT1 robe_NN1 of_IO seven-pounds_NN2 of_IO cloth_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
On_II Schwenkler_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 interpretation_NN1 ,_, RM_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 deficit_NN1 consists_VVZ precisely_RR in_CS21 that_CS22 he_PPHS1 is_VBZ visually_RR aware_JJ of_IO spatial_JJ objects_NN2 (_( one_MC1 object_NN1 at_II a_AT1 time_NNT1 ,_, to_TO be_VBI precise_JJ )_) ,_, without_IW being_VBG visually_RR aware_JJ of_IO the_AT space_NN1 in_II which_DDQ these_DD2 objects_NN2 are_VBR located_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 Bennett_NP1 ,_, both_DB2 views_NN2 are_VBR proxy_NN1 actualist_NN1 ,_, but_CCB not_XX genuinely_RR actualist_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT very_JJ concept_NN1 of_IO interest_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 co-evolving_JJ grouping_NN1 of_IO individuals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 also_RR should_VM not_XX be_VBI read_VVN as_CSA supporting_VVG the_AT popular_JJ myth_NN1 that_CST racism_NN1 is_VBZ by_RR31 and_RR32 large_RR33 a_AT1 problem_NN1 of_IO the_AT uneducated_JJ '_NULL underclasses_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Christianity_NN1 Today_RT ,_, we_PPIS2 find_VV0 that_DD1 of_IO paragraphs_NN2 containing_VVG pornography_NN1 keywords_NN2 ,_, 18.7%_FO also_RR contain_VV0 keywords_NN2 corresponding_VVG to_II the_AT narrative_NN1 of_IO personal-viewer_JJ harm_NN1 ,_, 13.2%_FO also_RR contain_VV0 keywords_NN2 corresponding_VVG to_II the_AT narrative_NN1 of_IO public-performer_JJ harm_NN1 ,_, and_CC 12.9%_FO also_RR contain_VV0 keywords_NN2 corresponding_VVG to_II the_AT narrative_NN1 of_IO traditional_JJ values_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II practice_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 shall_VM mostly_RR be_VBI concerned_JJ with_IW PA_NN1 and_CC certain_JJ of_IO its_APPGE sub-theories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A._NP1 &lsqb;_( Stefano_NP1 Cappa_NP1 &rsqb;_) :_: &lsqb;_( T_ZZ1 &rsqb;_) o_UH examine_VV0 in_II depth_NN1 this_DD1 point_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 found_VVN the_AT results_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 survey_NN1 conducted_VVN on_II schoolchildren_NN2 in_II various_JJ Italian_JJ regions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT present_JJ section_NN1 I_PPIS1 offer_VV0 a_AT1 concise_JJ description_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 reading_NN1 and_CC in_II the_AT remaining_JJ sections_NN2 I_PPIS1 discuss_VV0 textual_JJ evidence_NN1 that_CST could_VM provide_VVI further_RRR support_VV0 for_IF it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ one_MC1 important_JJ obstacle_NN1 that_CST prevents_VVZ Cummins_NN2 from_II abandoning_VVG the_AT modal_JJ reading_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Starting_VVG in_II the_AT 1960s_MC2 ,_, the_AT Central_JJ University_NN1 for_IF Nationalities_NN2 (_( now_RT Minzu_NP1 University_NN1 of_IO China_NP1 )_) established_VVD a_AT1 Manchu_NP1 class_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ has_VHZ trained_VVN many_DA2 outstanding_JJ students_NN2 of_IO Manchu_NP1 over_II the_AT past_NN1 half_DB century_NNT1 !_! 
</s>
<s>
Ancient_JJ Chinese_JJ and_CC Greek_JJ thinkers_NN2 alike_RR were_VBDR preoccupied_JJ with_IW the_AT moral_JJ value_NN1 of_IO music_NN1 ;_; they_PPHS2 distinguished_VVD between_II good_JJ and_CC bad_JJ music_NN1 by_II looking_VVG at_II the_AT music_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 effect_NN1 on_II moral_JJ character_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participating_JJ scientists_NN2 ,_, no_RGQV31 matter_RGQV32 how_RGQV33 open_JJ to_II international_JJ collaboration_NN1 ,_, had_VHD to_TO negotiate_VVI broader_JJR systems_NN2 of_IO cultural_JJ and_CC socioeconomic_JJ difference_NN1 that_CST shape_VV0 individual_JJ capacities_NN2 to_TO actually_RR mobilize_VVI knowledge_NN1 into_II policy_NN1 ,_, especially_RR with_IW local_JJ stakeholders_NN2 thrown_VVN in_II the_AT mix_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, what_DDQ should_VM we_PPIS2 expect_VVI about_II the_AT near-future_JJ behavior_NN1 of_IO wheels_NN2 of_IO fortune_NN1 in_II states_NN2 in_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 are_VBR about_RPK to_TO be_VBI spun_VVN by_II appropriate_JJ croupiers_NN2 or_CC spinning_VVG mechanisms_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, unbelievers_VVZ are_VBR trying_VVG to_TO attain_VVI fullness_NN1 from_II within_RL ,_, rather_CS21 than_CS22 from_II without_RL ,_, and_CC this_DD1 can_VM take_VVI many_DA2 different_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO which_DDQ Freud_NP1 is_VBZ one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, there_EX are_VBR at_RR21 least_RR22 two_MC entrenched_JJ opinions_NN2 regarding_II the_AT current_JJ situation_NN1 of_IO asylum_NN1 seekers_NN2 from_II the_AT Middle_JJ East_ND1 that_CST have_VH0 been_VBN put_VVN to_TO question_VVI by_II the_AT march_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, as_CSA with_IW other_JJ aesthetic_JJ ideas_NN2 ,_, by_II simply_RR saying_VVG this_DD1 piece_NN1 is_VBZ about_II an_AT1 indigo_JJ mood_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 not_XX yet_RR captured_VVN the_AT surplus_NN1 of_IO meaning_NN1 present_NN1 in_II it_PPH1 ,_, for_IF it_PPH1 also_RR involves_VVZ "_" a_AT1 coherent_JJ whole_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 unutterable_JJ fullness_NN1 of_IO thought_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 promoted_VVD a_AT1 strategy_NN1 of_IO valuing_VVG harmony_NN1 ,_, "_" danced_VVN and_CC made_VVN relatives_NN2 with_IW the_AT Sanmiao_NP1 "_" where_CS they_PPHS2 lived_VVD ,_, used_JJ virtue_NN1 to_TO transform_VVI them_PPHO2 ,_, and_CC made_VVD them_PPHO2 "_" abandon_VV0 evil_JJ and_CC follow_VV0 good_JJ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO occurrent_NN1 ,_, object-directed_JJ emotions_NN2 ,_, the_AT feelings_NN2 of_IO caring_VVG involved_JJ in_II affective_JJ framing_NN1 occupy_VV0 more_DAR of_IO the_AT foreground_NN1 ,_, typically_RR adding_VVG content_JJ and_CC valence_NN1 to_II what_DDQ lies_VVZ at_II the_AT focal_JJ point_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE experience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX relevant_JJ any_DD more_DAR for_IF the_AT assessment_NN1 of_IO the_AT Higgs_NP1 data_NN since_CS the_AT evidence_NN1 collected_VVN in_II 2012_MC amounted_VVD to_II the_AT discovery_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 Higgs_NP1 particle_NN1 on_II any_DD account_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, the_AT contributors_NN2 only_RR indirectly_RR address_VV0 the_AT question_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ freedom_NN1 and_CC the_AT boundaries_NN2 between_II human_NN1 and_CC divine_JJ agency_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 take_VV0 disjunction_NN1 as_CSA another_DD1 example_NN1 that_CST will_VM finish_VVI our_APPGE discussion_NN1 of_IO the_AT relation_NN1 between_II categorical_JJ and_CC inversion_NN1 harmony_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 will_VM make_VVI implicit_JJ reference_NN1 to_II that_DD1 exposition_NN1 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 reproducing_VVG all_DB the_AT details_NN2 of_IO Fine_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 semantics_NN1 here_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM first_MD give_VVI an_AT1 overview_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ I_PPIS1 call_VV0 the_AT "_" Confucian_JJ standards_NN2 of_IO reasoning_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, a_AT1 constant_JJ and_CC variable_JJ domain_NN1 model_NN1 is_VBZ exactly_RR the_AT same_DA as_CSA a_AT1 variable_JJ domain_NN1 model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD sentence_NN1 is_VBZ on_II the_AT right_JJ lines_NN2 because_CS it_PPH1 reflects_VVZ the_AT fictionalist_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 need_VV0 to_TO establish_VVI that_DD1 use_NN1 of_IO the_AT concept_NN1 MUSICAL_JJ WORK_NN1 makes_VVZ a_AT1 positive_JJ contribution_NN1 to_II the_AT value_NN1 of_IO musical_JJ practices_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 section_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 briefly_RR outline_VV0 several_DA2 potential_JJ applications_NN2 of_IO the_AT DRA_NN1 framework_NN1 within_II business_NN1 ethics_NN that_CST may_VM offer_VVI important_JJ avenues_NN2 for_IF future_JJ research_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 requires_VVZ me_PPIO1 both_RR to_TO conceal_VVI my_APPGE flaws_NN2 (_( at_RR21 least_RR22 the_AT ones_NN2 I_PPIS1 know_VV0 I_PPIS1 have_VH0 )_) and_CC (_( where_CS appropriate_JJ )_) to_TO act_VVI as_CS21 though_CS22 I_PPIS1 have_VH0 thoughts_NN2 and_CC feelings_NN2 that_CST I_PPIS1 should_VM have_VHI ,_, but_CCB do_VD0 not_XX ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 correct_JJ answer_NN1 to_II each_DD1 question_NN1 will_VM tell_VVI us_PPIO2 which_DDQ are_VBR the_AT facts_NN2 in_II virtue_NN1 of_IO which_DDQ something_PN1 is_VBZ the_AT case_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 in_II this_DD1 regard_NN1 that_CST the_AT tasks_NN2 the_AT patients_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN instructed_VVN to_TO perform_VVI do_VD0 not_XX require_VVI anything_PN1 like_II introspection_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 study_NN1 of_IO Protestant_JJ seminarians_NN2 found_VVD that_CST ,_, despite_II being_VBG on_II average_NN1 somewhat_RR supportive_JJ of_IO family_NN1 planning_NN1 ,_, seminarians_NN2 from_II conservative_JJ Protestant_JJ denominations_NN2 were_VBDR significantly_RR less_RGR supportive_JJ of_IO family_NN1 planning_NN1 than_CSN were_VBDR non-conservative_JJ students_NN2 (_( Ellison_NP1 and_CC Goodson_NP1 1997_MC )_) and_CC were_VBDR less_RGR likely_JJ to_TO plan_VVI to_TO promote_VVI contraception_NN1 in_II the_AT future_NN1 (_( Goodson_NP1 2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, both_RR Raz_NP1 and_CC Kolodny_NP1 make_VV0 use_NN1 of_IO examples_NN2 in_II which_DDQ the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST an_AT1 agent_NN1 is_VBZ unlikely_JJ to_TO conform_VVI to_II a_AT1 presumed_JJ source_NN1 '_NULL ought_VMK '_NULL is_VBZ not_XX due_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 failure_NN1 of_IO the_AT agent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Scholarship_NN1 is_VBZ often_RR a_AT1 social_JJ enterprise_NN1 ,_, and_CC for_IF me_PPIO1 ,_, that_DD1 has_VHZ generally_RR been_VBN a_AT1 happy_JJ form_NN1 of_IO production_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cohen_NP1 appears_VVZ to_TO be_VBI advocating_VVG that_CST we_PPIS2 instead_RR understand_VV0 objectivity_NN1 ,_, in_CS41 so_CS42 far_CS43 as_CS44 it_PPH1 characterizes_VVZ public_JJ reasoning_NN1 ,_, in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 reasons_NN2 sufficient_JJ to_TO convince_VVI all_DB reasonable_JJ persons_NN2 that_CST a_AT1 political_JJ conviction_NN1 is_VBZ true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 must_VM also_RR assume_VVI that_CST something_PN1 of_IO importance_NN1 turns_VVZ on_II giving_VVG a_AT1 precise_JJ and_CC accurate_JJ account_NN1 of_IO causal_JJ relata_NN1 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 our_APPGE understanding_NN1 of_IO causation_NN1 itself_PPX1 would_VM suffer_VVI if_CS we_PPIS2 chose_VVD rather_RR to_TO give_VVI the_AT question_NN1 a_AT1 self-consciously_RR non-committal_JJ answer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Critical_JJ analysts_NN2 understand_VV0 climate_NN1 change_NN1 as_CSA one_MC1 of_IO the_AT most_RGT destructive_JJ consequences_NN2 of_IO capitalism_NN1 ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 transformation_NN1 of_IO socio-environmental_JJ relations_NN2 that_CST increases_VVZ inequalities_NN2 across_II the_AT globe_NN1 ,_, and_CC as_II a_AT1 major_JJ constraint_NN1 on_II capital_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 continuous_JJ accumulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST apart_II21 from_II22 being_VBG determined_VVN by_II bodily_JJ force_NN1 ,_, shooting_NN1 is_VBZ also_RR the_AT aspect_NN1 of_IO archery_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ most_RGT external_JJ or_CC distanced_VVN from_II the_AT archer_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 person_NN1 and_CC is_VBZ also_RR what_DDQ most_RRT invites_VVZ spectacle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO develop_VVI a_AT1 capacity_NN1 for_IF optimal_JJ appropriateness_NN1 (_( yi_NNU )_) ,_, Confucianism_NN1 grounds_VVZ its_APPGE ethics_NN in_II an_AT1 epistemology_NN1 of_IO feeling_NN1 and_CC an_AT1 aesthetic_JJ education_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Obvious_JJ :_: why_RRQ else_RR would_VM we_PPIS2 read_VVI Capital_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 alternative_JJ approach_NN1 to_II biological_JJ function_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT selected_JJ effect_NN1 account_NN1 (_( Papineau_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1987_MC &rsqb;_) ;_; Millikan_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1984_MC &rsqb;_) ,_, &lsqb;_( 1989_MC &rsqb;_) ;_; Neander_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1991_MC &rsqb;_) ;_; Griffiths_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1993_MC &rsqb;_) ;_; Godfrey-Smith_NP1 &lsqb;_( 1994_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_RR21 most_RR22 ,_, it_PPH1 shows_VVZ that_CST his_APPGE experience_NN1 of_IO moving_VVG objects_NN2 is_VBZ wildly_RR inaccurate_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM now_RT address_VVI their_APPGE position_NN1 on_II values_NN2 head_VV0 on_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alongside_II these_DD2 common_JJ indicators_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR include_VV0 a_AT1 less_RGR commonly_RR examined_VVN aspect_NN1 of_IO religious_JJ experience_NN1 :_: the_AT identification_NN1 of_IO being_VBG born_VVN again_RT ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, as_CSA Derek_NP1 Parfit_NP1 has_VHZ recently_RR argued_VVN ,_, to_TO escape_VVI puzzles_NN2 of_IO non-identity_NN1 and_CC different_JJ numbers_NN2 ,_, contractualism_NN1 must_VM become_VVI more_RGR impersonal_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT education_NN1 of_IO some_DD members_NN2 of_IO the_AT community_NN1 to_II one_MC1 or_CC the_AT other_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 traditions_NN2 could_VM be_VBI expected_VVN to_TO produce_VVI more_RGR sharply_RR divergent_JJ answers_NN2 to_II questions_NN2 like_II that_DD1 concerning_VVG how_RRQ to_TO incorporate_VVI sexual_JJ motivation_NN1 into_II a_AT1 good_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Barnes_NP1 claims_VVZ that_CST they_PPHS2 do_VD0 not_XX disagree_VVI about_II the_AT fact_NN1 that_DD1 being_VBG a_AT1 woman_NN1 is_VBZ grounded_VVN or_CC on_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT grounds_NN2 ,_, yet_RR they_PPHS2 do_VD0 disagree_VVI about_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO being_VBG a_AT1 woman_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Kant_JJ subjectivized_JJ time_NNT1 ,_, space_NN1 and_CC causality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Elsewhere_RL ,_, I_PPIS1 have_VH0 discussed_VVN the_AT conflict_NN1 between_II the_AT significance_NN1 accorded_VVN to_II the_AT role_NN1 of_IO the_AT imagination_NN1 in_II engaging_VVG with_IW works_NN of_IO art_NN1 and_CC the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST many_DA2 films_NN2 appear_VV0 to_TO leave_VVI very_RG little_DA1 to_II the_AT imagination_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Undoubtedly_RR ,_, Zizek_NP1 deserves_VVZ credit_NN1 for_IF one_MC1 major_JJ achievement_NN1 :_: upsetting_VVG the_AT traditional_JJ opposition_NN1 between_II '_NULL Western_JJ Marxism_NN1 '_NULL and_CC Diamat_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ also_RR well-known_JJ that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR not_XX aware_JJ of_IO our_APPGE body_NN1 at_II a_AT1 fine-grained_JJ level_NN1 of_IO detail_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Owing_II21 to_II22 Marxist_JJ scruples_NN2 ,_, the_AT Bolsheviks_NN2 described_VVD the_AT projected_JJ vlast_NN1 as_II a_AT1 '_NULL provisional_JJ revolutionary_JJ government_NN1 "_" :_: the_AT socialist_JJ proletariat_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX supposed_JJ to_TO take_VVI power_NN1 permanently_RR prior_II21 to_II22 the_AT socialist_JJ revolution_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 intoxicated_JJ driver_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, knows_VVZ (_( or_CC should_VM know_VVI )_) that_CST her_APPGE driving_NN1 increases_VVZ the_AT risk_NN1 of_IO injury_NN1 or_CC death_NN1 to_II others_NN2 but_CCB proceeds_VVZ to_TO drive_VVI anyway_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II an_AT1 evaluation_NN1 ev_NN1 built_VVN over_II an_AT1 assignment_NN1 v_ZZ1 we_PPIS2 will_VM mean_VVI a_AT1 function_NN1 assigning_VVG values_NN2 to_II all_DB well-formed_JJ formulas_NN2 (_( ev_NN1 :_: L_ZZ1 →_NULL V_ZZ1 al_FW )_) agreeing_VVG with_IW v_ZZ1 on_II W_ZZ1 (_( propositional_JJ variables_NN2 )_) ,_, and_CC satisfying_VVG some_DD additional_JJ constraints_NN2 determined_VVN by_II a_AT1 given_JJ logic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Denial_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 speech_NN1 act_NN1 and_CC rejection_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 mental_JJ state_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT function_NN1 of_IO the_AT PDP_NP1 is_VBZ fundamentally_RR to_TO provoke_VVI change_NN1 :_: "_" A_ZZ1 catalytic_JJ role_NN1 is_VBZ played_VVN by_II DNDi_NP1 in_II the_AT day-to-day_JJ management_NN1 ,_, coordination_NN1 and_CC empowerment_NN1 of_IO the_AT project_NN1 stakeholders_NN2 with_IW a_AT1 common_JJ defined_JJ objective_NN1 "_" (_( Ioset_NP1 and_CC Chang_VV0 2011_MC ,_, 1362_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Public_JJ discourse_NN1 on_II these_DD2 developments_NN2 has_VHZ typically_RR been_VBN framed_VVN in_II the_AT ethical_JJ terms_NN2 of_IO human_JJ rights_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE violations_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT developments_NN2 themselves_PPX2 have_VH0 tended_VVN to_TO be_VBI regulated_VVN according_II21 to_II22 the_AT institutional_JJ logic_NN1 of_IO bioethics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 will_VM focus_VVI my_APPGE critical_JJ attention_NN1 on_II premise_NN1 (_( 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, the_AT density_NN1 of_IO SBC_NP1 congregations_NN2 in_II Adams_NP1 County_NN1 grew_VVD from_II 27_MC in_II 1900_MC to_II 105_MC in_II 1960_MC ,_, an_AT1 increase_NN1 of_IO nearly_RR 400%_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, Kleene_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 second_NNT1 model_NN1 K2_NP1 can_VM be_VBI understood_VVN as_II an_AT1 "_" oracle_NN1 computation_NN1 "_" version_NN1 of_IO Kleene_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 first_MD model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, (_( 5b_FO )_) preserves_VVZ the_AT dimension_NN1 of_IO (_( 5a_FO )_) ,_, as_CSA (_( 5b_FO )_) denies_VVZ that_CST the_AT car_NN1 is_VBZ red_JJ with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 color_NN1 ;_; it_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX deny_VVI that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ red_JJ in_II any_DD other_JJ respect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recipient_NN1 countries_NN2 become_VV0 dependent_JJ on_II outsiders_NN2 ,_, and_CC development_NN1 projects_NN2 fail_VV0 for_IF lack_NN1 of_IO citizen_NN1 ownership_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ideally_RR ,_, one_PN1 is_VBZ entirely_RR immersed_VVN in_II this_DD1 particular_JJ situation_NN1 while_CS still_RR being_VBG able_JK to_TO achieve_VVI a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO detachment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 good_JJ number_NN1 of_IO Western_JJ thinkers_NN2 like_II Hegel_NP1 ,_, Kant_NP1 ,_, Hume_NP1 ,_, Levy-Bruhl_NP1 ,_, etc._RA ,_, in_II the_AT past_NN1 have_VH0 argued_VVN in_II a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST tended_VVD to_TO show_VVI that_CST the_AT right_NN1 to_TO know_VVI resided_VVN in_II some_DD persons_NN2 from_II a_AT1 particular_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 truth_NN1 function_NN1 defined_VVN in_II Definition_NN1 4.4_MC corresponds_VVZ to_II a_AT1 winning_JJ strategy_NN1 for_IF the_AT Verifier_NN1 in_II the_AT game_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, suppose_VV0 that_CST God_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 decision_NN1 to_TO create_VVI numbers_NN2 is_VBZ contingent_JJ on_II the_AT amount_NN1 of_IO evil_NN1 in_II the_AT world_NN1 ,_, and_CC suppose_VV0 that_CST we_PPIS2 only_RR just_RR came_VVD in_RP under_II the_AT bar_NN1 required_VVN for_IF numerical_JJ creation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT language_NN1 of_IO speech_NN1 acts_NN2 ,_, the_AT singer_NN1 and_CC the_AT composer-who_PNQS initially_RR wrote_VVD the_AT lyrics_NN2 in_II 1950_MC for_IF the_AT Broadway_NN1 musical_JJ Guys_NN2 and_CC Dolls-issue_NN1 a_AT1 direct_JJ command_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD have_VH0 therefore_RR endorsed_VVN it_PPH1 or_CC something_PN1 akin_JJ to_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT question_NN1 is_VBZ all_DB the_AT more_RGR pressing_JJ since_CS Pinto_NP1 claims_VVZ that_CST "_" arguers_NN2 need_VM not_XX intend_VVI any_DD effect_NN1 beyond_II that_DD1 of_IO making_VVG it_PPH1 manifest_VVI to_II their_APPGE hearers_NN2 that_CST there_EX is_VBZ reason_NN1 for_IF doing_VDG some_DD particular_JJ thing_NN1 "_" (_( p._NNU 229_MC )_) and_CC that_CST the_AT effect_NN1 produced_VVN may_VM differ_VVI from_II the_AT one_PN1 intended_VVD by_II the_AT arguer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB of_IO those_DD2 world-stages_NN2 (_( whether_CSW the_AT world_NN1 in_II question_NN1 is_VBZ actual_JJ ,_, merely_RR possible_JJ or_CC impossible_JJ )_) are_VBR genuine_JJ parts_NN2 of_IO reality_NN1 :_: they_PPHS2 are_VBR what_DDQ we_PPIS2 quantify_VV0 over_RP when_CS using_VVG our_APPGE most_RGT unrestricted_JJ quantifier_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
THREAT_NN1 FROM_II SLEEPING_VVG TACTICAL_JJ BOMBER-Just_JJ like_II THREAT_NN1 FROM_II TACTICAL_JJ BOMBER_NN1 except_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT bomber_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 civilian_NN1 who_PNQS was_VBDZ taken_VVN from_II his_APPGE home_NN1 while_CS asleep_JJ ,_, propped_VVN up_RP while_CS asleep_JJ ,_, will_VM push_VVI the_AT bombing_NN1 button_NN1 while_CS asleep_JJ ,_, etc_RA ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT representation_NN1 of_IO direct_JJ causal_JJ dependence_NN1 is_VBZ what_DDQ accounts_VVZ for_IF the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST our_APPGE perceptual_JJ experiences_NN2 possess_VV0 objectimmediacy_NN1 ,_, then_RT such_DA an_AT1 experience_NN1 ought_VMK to_TO lack_VVI objectimmediacy_NN1 (_( assuming_VVG no_AT remaining_JJ feature_NN1 suffices_VVZ for_IF objectimmediacy_NN1 )_) ;_; and_CC ,_, in_II fact_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 believe_VV0 it_PPH1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 plausible_JJ to_TO claim_VVI that_CST it_PPH1 would_VM ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB such_DA responses_NN2 open_VV0 the_AT door_NN1 to_II a_AT1 different_JJ kind_NN1 of_IO worry_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB this_DD1 is_VBZ only_RR apparently_RR plausible_JJ since_CS many_DA2 constituents_NN2 beside_II pleasure_NN1 may_VM underlie_VVI our_APPGE interest_NN1 in_II an_AT1 aesthetic_JJ offering_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ notable_JJ that_CST Marx_NP1 makes_VVZ this_DD1 comment_NN1 in_II reference_NN1 to_II the_AT violent_JJ ways_NN2 in_II which_DDQ the_AT social_JJ conditions_NN2 of_IO labour_NN1 naturalise_VV0 the_AT capitalist_JJ mode_NN1 of_IO production_NN1 ;_; certainly_RR ,_, he_PPHS1 is_VBZ not_XX arguing_VVG there_EX is_VBZ anything_PN1 natural_JJ about_II reproduction_NN1 for_IF the_AT needs_NN2 of_IO capital_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Walton_NP1 argues_VVZ that_DD1 switching_NN1 which_DDQ properties_NN2 are_VBR standard_JJ and_CC variable_NN1 '_NULL would_VM make_VVI a_AT1 profound_JJ difference_NN1 between_II our_APPGE aesthetic_JJ reaction_NN1 to_II Guernica_NP1 and_CC theirs_PPGE '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT same_DA thing_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI true_JJ regarding_II temporal_JJ experience_NN1 in_II action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nor_CC is_VBZ the_AT model_NN1 obviously_RR applicable_JJ to_II the_AT data_NN on_II the_AT seemingly_RR metarepresentational_JJ looking_JJ behaviour_NN1 in_II infants_NN2 mentioned_VVN above_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA an_AT1 approach_NN1 tries_VVZ to_TO reach_VVI people_NN where_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR ,_, given_VVN their_APPGE particular_JJ conditions_NN2 ,_, allowing_VVG conversion_NN1 in_II context_NN1 (_( see_VV0 also_RR Burke_NP1 and_CC Pepper_NN1 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, Heidegger_NP1 declines_VVZ to_TO draw_VVI any_DD antirealistic_JJ conclusions_NN2 from_II the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST being_NN1 '_NULL is_VBZ '_NULL only_RR if_CS there_EX are_VBR Daseins_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, macaques_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX show_VVI the_AT same_DA behaviour_NN1 (_( Marticorena_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2011_MC )_) and_CC there_EX has_VHZ been_VBN no_AT suggestion_NN1 that_CST the_AT capacity_NN1 for_IF non-conceptual_JJ metarepresentation_NN1 extends_VVZ more_RGR widely_RR than_CSN that_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF programs_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 Future_JJ Earth_NN1 ,_, funders_NN2 promote_VV0 transdisciplinary_JJ models_NN2 of_IO research_NN1 as_II a_AT1 way_NN1 to_TO accelerate_VVI and_CC improve_VVI the_AT "_" linear_JJ "_" model_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 mobilization-where_CS academic_JJ experts_NN2 make_VV0 discoveries_NN2 and_CC hand_NN1 off_II results_NN2 to_II decision_NN1 makers_NN2 (_( Bai_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2016_MC ;_; Lee-mans_NN2 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT priest_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX satisfied_VVN with_IW this_DD1 explanation_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 doesn_NN1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 show_VV0 that_CST Sutton_NP1 has_VHZ failed_VVN to_TO explain_VVI his_APPGE robbing_NN1 of_IO banks_NN2 ;_; it_PPH1 merely_RR shows_VVZ that_CST the_AT priest_NN1 wanted_VVD more_DAR than_CSN just_RR an_AT1 explanation_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 fact_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 may_VM well_RR assume_VVI that_CST that_DD1 is_VBZ all_DB there_EX is_VBZ to_II Confucianism_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 does_VDZ not_XX construct_VVI some_DD unrealistic_JJ model_NN1 of_IO '_NULL representative_JJ agents_NN2 '_NULL and_CC try_VV0 to_TO fit_VVI facts_NN2 to_II it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ because_CS the_AT name_NN1 paradox_NN1 allows_VVZ many_DA2 other_JJ modes_NN2 of_IO expression_NN1 other_II21 than_II22 naming_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 negatives_NN2 ,_, metaphors_NN2 ,_, and_CC conditional_JJ clauses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Philosophers_NN2 have_VH0 therefore_RR made_VVN two_MC mistakes_NN2 about_II the_AT relata_NN1 of_IO causation_NN1 :_: one_PN1 is_VBZ to_TO have_VHI accepted_VVN unwarranted_JJ restrictions_NN2 on_II the_AT categories_NN2 pertinent_JJ to_II causation_NN1 ;_; the_AT other_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO have_VHI wrongly_RR assumed_VVN that_CST we_PPIS2 are_VBR in_II a_AT1 position_NN1 to_TO name_VVI them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alex_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 advice_NN1 concerned_VVD the_AT fairness_NN1 of_IO the_AT price_NN1 ,_, not_XX the_AT trustworthiness_NN1 of_IO the_AT purchaser_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Like_II roads_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 link_VV0 or_CC connect_VV0 things_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 way_NN1 of_IO putting_VVG this_DD1 that_CST makes_VVZ the_AT problem_NN1 particularly_RR obvious_JJ :_: it_PPH1 is_VBZ neither_RR clearly_RR true_JJ nor_CC clearly_RR false_JJ that_CST "_" Ethan_NP1 is_VBZ short_JJ "_" is_VBZ more_RGR true_JJ than_CSN "_" George_NP1 is_VBZ bald_JJ "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB R_ZZ1 could_VM have_VHI existed_VVN and_CC have_VH0 been_VBN constituted_VVN by_II other_JJ the_AT same_DA or_CC other_JJ processes_NN2 not_XX part_NN1 of_IO processes_NN2 Pr_NP1 (_( C_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 is_VBZ troubled_VVN by_II religious_JJ ideas_NN2 that_CST divert_VV0 us_PPIO2 from_II moral_JJ practice_NN1 by_II encouraging_VVG us_PPIO2 to_TO seek_VVI special_JJ exemptions_NN2 or_CC favors_VVZ through_II supernatural_JJ means_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 will_VM proceed_VVI in_II two_MC steps_NN2 :_: In_II a_AT1 first_MD step_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 will_VM lay_VVI the_AT ground_NN1 by_II working_VVG out_RP the_AT basic_JJ features_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 common_JJ account_NN1 of_IO normative_JJ reasons_NN2 as_CSA presupposed_VVN in_II the_AT Mengzi_NN1 and_CC the_AT Xunzi_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Futurism_NN1 is_VBZ known_VVN as_II a_AT1 political_JJ and_CC artistic_JJ movement_NN1 much_RR researched_VVN by_II literary_JJ critics_NN2 and_CC art_NN1 historians_NN2 ,_, whereas_CS ISIS_NP1 is_VBZ a_AT1 radical_JJ terrorist_JJ organization_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT projection_NN1 of_IO hypothetical_JJ quasi-universals_NN2 can_VM not_XX be_VBI avoided_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Epistemological_JJ analyses_NN2 of_IO testimony_NN1 have_VH0 become_VVN increasingly_RR popular_JJ and_CC have_VH0 led_VVN to_II developments_NN2 in_II the_AT analyses_NN2 of_IO trust_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB any_DD finitely_RR generated_VVN fully_RR previous_JJ redundant_JJ action_NN1 is_VBZ actually_RR finite_JJ ,_, because_CS any_DD term_NN1 in_II the_AT generators_NN2 is_VBZ equivalent_JJ to_II one_PN1 in_II which_DDQ no_AT generator_NN1 appears_VVZ more_DAR than_CSN once_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT lack_NN1 of_IO empirical_JJ studies_NN2 was_VBDZ due_II21 to_II22 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST most_DAT major_JJ surveys_NN2 had_VHD too_RG few_DA2 black_JJ respondents_NN2 (_( generally_RR around_RG 100-150_MCMC )_) to_TO conduct_VVI meaningful_JJ sub-group_JJ analysis_NN1 and_CC typically_RR examined_VVN only_RR 2_MC or_CC 3_MC measures_NN2 of_IO religious_JJ participation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ what_DDQ discourse_NN1 theories_NN2 like_II that_DD1 in_II study_NN1 ;_; they_PPHS2 make_VV0 use_NN1 of_IO the_AT lexical_JJ and_CC compositional_JJ content_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE relata_NN1 to_TO infer_VVI such_DA relational_JJ discourse_NN1 moves_NN2 and_CC check_VVI their_APPGE coherence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_II assessing_VVG the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO the_AT religion_NN1 variables_NN2 on_II the_AT contraception_NN1 and_CC family_NN1 planning_NN1 opinion_NN1 variables_NN2 discussed_VVN above_RL ,_, we_PPIS2 introduce_VV0 controls_NN2 for_IF other_JJ explanatory_JJ variables_NN2 that_CST may_VM affect_VVI opinions_NN2 about_II family_NN1 planning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, shame_NN1 over_II the_AT parts_NN2 of_IO oneself_PNX1 that_CST need_VV0 restraint_NN1 but_CCB are_VBR not_XX yet_RR restrained_VVN can_VM lead_VVI not_XX only_RR to_II increased_JJ effort_NN1 at_II self-regulation_NN1 ,_, but_CCB also_RR seeking_VVG out_RP sources_NN2 of_IO deep_JJ satisfaction_NN1 in_II activities_NN2 made_VVD possible_JJ by_II self-regulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO avoid_VVI temporal_JJ order_NN1 illusions_NN2 ,_, the_AT brain_NN1 must_VM take_VVI into_II account_NN1 these_DD2 discrepancies_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ it_PPH1 is_VBZ able_JK to_TO do_VDI to_II some_DD extent_NN1 ,_, either_RR by_II recalibrating_VVG (_( see_VV0 e.g._REX Vroomen_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2004_MC )_) )_) ,_, or_CC by_II inferring_VVG temporal_JJ relations_NN2 from_II assumptions_NN2 about_II event-relations_NN2 like_II causal_JJ relations_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 hold_NN1 between_II actions_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE perceived_JJ effects_NN2 (_( Morein-Zamir_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2003_MC )_) ,_, Haggard_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2002_MC )_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
MZ_NP1 twins_NN2 are_VBR also_RR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI treated_VVN and_CC dressed_VVN alike_RR than_CSN DZ_NP1 twins_NN2 ,_, making_VVG genetic_JJ influence_NN1 seem_VV0 more_RGR important_JJ in_II shaping_VVG their_APPGE behaviors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Within_II the_AT worlds_NN2 of_IO philosophy_NN1 and_CC to_II some_DD extent_NN1 ,_, psychology_NN1 ,_, "_" originality_NN1 "_" has_VHZ been_VBN misleadingly_RR tied_VVN to_II the_AT notions_NN2 of_IO "_" creativity_NN1 "_" and_CC "_" genius_NN1 ,_, "_" thereby_RR replicating_VVG a_AT1 cultural_JJ bias_NN1 that_CST links_VVZ an_AT1 artist_NN1 to_II particular_JJ mental_JJ processes_NN2 that_CST are_VBR unnecessarily_RR exclusive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO routes_NN2 a_AT1 theist_NN1 might_VM pursue_VVI in_II31 response_II32 to_II33 Rowe_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 challenge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 become_VV0 affectively_RR charged_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Relative_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 background_NN1 tonic_NN1 level_NN1 of_IO firing_NN1 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 transitory_JJ phasic_JJ increase_NN1 when_CS a_AT1 unpredicted_JJ reward_NN1 is_VBZ delivered_VVN ,_, and_CC a_AT1 phasic_JJ decrease_NN1 in_II firing_VVG when_RRQ a_AT1 predicted_JJ reward_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX delivered_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Edward_NP1 F._NP1 Mooney_NP1 begins_VVZ with_IW Kierkegaard_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Fear_NN1 and_CC Trembling_VVG as_II the_AT Ur-text_NN1 and_CC womb_VV0 for_IF philosophy_NN1 and_CC engages_VVZ Derrida_NP1 and_CC Irigaray_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 took_VVD on_RP an_AT1 explicitly_RR ethnic_JJ dimension_NN1 in_II this_DD1 city_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Stated_VVN in_II this_DD1 way_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 see_VV0 that_CST the_AT paradeigma_NN1 is_VBZ set_VVN down_RP as_II an_AT1 example_NN1 which_DDQ is_VBZ capable_JJ of_IO exhibiting_VVG intelligibility_NN1 ,_, capable_JJ of_IO demonstrating_VVG sameness_NN1 and_CC difference_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 paper_NN1 broadens_VVZ the_AT limited_JJ area_NN1 of_IO scholarship_NN1 on_II New_JJ Age_NN1 spiritualism_NN1 by_II providing_VVG and_CC explanation_NN1 for_IF the_AT suasive_JJ force_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 of_IO its_APPGE main_JJ themes_NN2 ,_, the_AT '_NULL Law_NN1 of_IO Attraction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Preliminary_JJ tests_NN2 incorporating_VVG board_NN1 composition_NN1 variables_NN2 indicate_VV0 a_AT1 positive_JJ relation_NN1 between_II the_AT decision_NN1 to_TO contribute_VVI ,_, and_CC the_AT financial_JJ amount_NN1 of_IO charitable_JJ contributions_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO outsiders_NN2 and_CC females_NN2 on_II the_AT board_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 fragment_NN1 of_IO the_AT language_NN1 of_IO classical_JJ first-order_JJ logic_NN1 is_VBZ given_VVN a_AT1 new_JJ semantics_NN1 ,_, using_VVG -sequences_NN2 of_IO classical_JJ models_NN2 ,_, in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO interpret_VVI the_AT basic_JJ predicates_NN2 as_CSA classifiers_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 kind_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Revolutionary_JJ strategy_NN1 '_NULL embraces_VVZ a_AT1 combined_JJ system_NN1 of_IO actions_NN2 which_DDQ by_II their_APPGE association_NN1 ,_, consistency_NN1 ,_, and_CC growth_NN1 must_VM lead_VVI the_AT proletariat_NN1 to_II the_AT conquest_NN1 of_IO power_NN1 '_NULL ,_, wrote_VVD Trotsky_NP1 in_II 1928_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA it_PPH1 turns_VVZ out_RP ,_, even_RR the_AT pathological_JJ incentive_NN1 of_IO external_JJ coercion_NN1 plays_VVZ a_AT1 role_NN1 in_II paving_VVG the_AT way_NN1 for_IF virtue_NN1 by_II working_VVG to_TO subvert_VVI the_AT juridical_JJ manifestation_NN1 of_IO self-conceit_NN1 ,_, one_MC1 of_IO the_AT sources_NN2 of_IO evil_NN1 in_II humanity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sengzhao_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 essay_NN1 ,_, while_CS far_RG more_RGR formal_JJ and_CC scholarly_JJ than_CSN the_AT Gt_NP1 ,_, makes_VVZ clear_JJ that_CST it_PPH1 emerges_VVZ from_II a_AT1 particular_JJ existential_JJ situation_NN1 of_IO confusion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Agle_VV0 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 1999_MC )_) conceptualize_VV0 the_AT salience_NN1 of_IO firms_NN2 '_NULL stakeholders_NN2 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 their_APPGE power_NN1 (_( financial_JJ and_CC political_JJ )_) ,_, legitimacy_NN1 (_( legal_JJ and_CC moral_JJ )_) ,_, and_CC urgency_NN1 (_( societal_JJ and_CC economic_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Until_CS the_AT late_JJ 1980s_MC2 ,_, cultural_JJ anthropology_NN1 was_VBDZ concerned_JJ with_IW studying_VVG the_AT "_" savage_NN1 "_" or_CC "_" primitive_JJ "_" society_NN1 ,_, assumed_VVD to_TO be_VBI different_JJ (_( the_AT "_" other_JJ "_" )_) ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, from_II the_AT investigator_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 developed_JJ culture_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Simply_RR put_VVN ,_, their_APPGE divisions_NN2 are_VBR essentially_RR as_CSA follows_VVZ :_: Looked_VVN at_II from_II the_AT perspective_NN1 of_IO the_AT development_NN1 and_CC continuation_NN1 of_IO Chinese_JJ historical_JJ culture_NN1 (_( Zhongguo_NP1 lishi_NN2 wenhua_NN1 )_) ,_, was_VBDZ Confucius_NP1 a_AT1 transmitter_NN1 or_CC a_AT1 creator_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 consider_VV0 it_PPH1 the_AT duty_NN1 of_IO the_AT party_NN1 to_TO solve_VVI political_JJ questions_NN2 politically_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 increased_JJ NT_NN1 (_( ≥3.5mm_FO )_) in_II the_AT combined_JJ test_NN1 is_VBZ associated_VVN with_IW an_AT1 increased_JJ risk_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 major_JJ heart_NN1 anomaly_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 variety_NN1 of_IO other_JJ structural_JJ abnormalities_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 diaphragmatic_JJ hernia_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 genetic_JJ syndromes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Kant_NN1 stresses_VVZ that_CST if_CS we_PPIS2 have_VH0 "_" a_AT1 disposition_NN1 of_IO true_JJ devotion_NN1 to_II duty_NN1 "_" and_CC accomplish_VV0 "_" as_RG much_DA1 as_CSA lies_VVZ within_RL &lsqb;_( our_APPGE &rsqb;_) power_NN1 "_" along_II ethical_JJ lines_NN2 ,_, then_RT we_PPIS2 can_VM certainly_RR hope_VVI that_DD1 "_" what_DDQ lies_VVZ outside_II our_APPGE power_NN1 will_VM be_VBI supplemented_VVN by_II the_AT supreme_JJ wisdom_NN1 in_II some_DD way_NN1 or_CC other_JJ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT axiom_NN1 system_NN1 for_IF IP_NN1 is_VBZ shown_VVN to_TO be_VBI sound_JJ and_CC complete_JJ with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 a_AT1 four-valued_JJ Kripke_NN1 semantics_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT axiom_NN1 system_NN1 for_IF CP_NP1 is_VBZ characterized_VVN by_II four-valued_JJ truth_NN1 tables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Development_NN1 and_CC democracy_NN1 should_VM be_VBI integrated_VVN in_II the_AT theory_NN1 and_CC practice_NN1 of_IO DE_NP1 and_CC GE_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 sense_NN1 ,_, the_AT film_NN1 can_VM be_VBI said_VVN to_TO exemplify_VVI the_AT recent_JJ trajectory_NN1 of_IO denationalisation_NN1 which_DDQ ,_, according_II21 to_II22 Mette_NP1 Hjort_NP1 ,_, means_VVZ that_CST there_EX has_VHZ been_VBN a_AT1 shift_NN1 in_II focus_NN1 from_II an_AT1 epiphanic_JJ to_II a_AT1 transnational_JJ culture_NN1 ;_; that_REX41 is_REX42 to_REX43 say_REX44 ,_, from_II a_AT1 culture_NN1 that_CST focuses_VVZ on_II the_AT narratives_NN2 of_IO certain_JJ nations_NN2 to_II the_AT circulation_NN1 of_IO audiovisual_JJ works_NN ,_, people_NN ,_, and_CC monies_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT emphasising_NN1 of_IO cultural_JJ commonalities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Andrew_NP1 Kania_NP1 has_VHZ attempted_VVN to_TO argue_VVI for_IF nihilistic_JJ fictionalism_NN1 about_II musical_JJ works_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO introduce_VVI the_AT first_MD pragmatic_JJ option_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 might_VM remind_VVI ourselves_PPX2 that_CST where_CS the_AT predicates_NN2 in_II (_( 1*_FO )_) -(5*)_FO are_VBR read_VVN analogically_RR ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, as_CSA expressing_VVG requirement_NN1 properties_NN2 ,_, the_AT sentences_NN2 come_VV0 out_RP true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT opinions_NN2 Aristotle_NP1 introduces_VVZ in_II this_DD1 way_NN1 are_VBR plausible_JJ claims_NN2 about_II the_AT soul_NN1 ,_, claims_VVZ that_CST are_VBR commonly_RR held_VVN ,_, held_VVN by_II the_AT wise_JJ ,_, or_CC ,_, as_CSA in_II this_DD1 case_NN1 ,_, held_VVN by_II Aristotle_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 interlocutors_NN2 :_: they_PPHS2 are_VBR endoxa_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, meaning_NN1 is_VBZ supplied_VVN by_II the_AT human_JJ being_NN1 since_CS only_RR the_AT human_JJ subject_NN1 perceives_VVZ it_PPH1 and_CC apart_II21 from_II22 human_JJ reality_NN1 there_EX is_VBZ no_AT meaning_NN1 ,_, or_CC at_II the_AT least_RGT there_EX is_VBZ no_AT search_NN1 for_IF it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT one_MC1 hand_NN1 ,_, he_PPHS1 detects_VVZ a_AT1 '_NULL premature_JJ rejection_NN1 of_IO Marx_NP1 and_CC Marxism_NN1 by_II some_DD Indigenous_JJ studies_NN2 scholars_NN2 '_NULL ,_, and_CC ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ ,_, '_NULL belligerent_JJ ,_, often_RR ignorant_JJ ,_, and_CC sometimes_RT racist_JJ dismissal_NN1 of_IO Indigenous_JJ peoples_NN2 '_NULL contributions_NN2 to_II radical_JJ thought_NN1 and_CC politics_NN1 by_II Marxists_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bruner_NN1 stakes_VVZ out_RP an_AT1 account_NN1 of_IO corporate_JJ governance_NN1 that_CST sits_VVZ between_II the_AT poles_NN2 of_IO functionalism_NN1 and_CC contextualise_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS the_AT goal_NN1 of_IO pursuing_VVG uprightness_NN1 or_CC honesty_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT same_DA ,_, their_APPGE ways_NN2 of_IO achieving_VVG it_PPH1 are_VBR different_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alongside_II Rabbi_NNB Pinto_NP1 ,_, on_II a_AT1 large_JJ platform_NN1 at_II the_AT front_NN1 of_IO the_AT cemetery_NN1 ,_, sit_VV0 the_AT community_NN1 leaders_NN2 ,_, the_AT two_MC Israeli_JJ chief_JJ rabbis_NN2 ,_, government_NN1 ministers_NN2 ,_, and_CC members_NN2 of_IO parliament_NN1 from_II all_DB the_AT parties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 claimed_VVD that_CST Rousseau_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 political_JJ orientation_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 "_" romantic_JJ collectivism_NN1 ,_, "_" which_DDQ necessarily_RR gives_VVZ rise_NN1 to_II a_AT1 despotic_JJ orientation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 examples_NN2 exhibit_VV0 forms_NN2 of_IO regard_NN1 that_CST are_VBR common_JJ to_II various_JJ musical_JJ instruments_NN2 today_RT ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT resulting_JJ concoction_NN1 is_VBZ termed_VVN Sociological_JJ Marxism_NN1 ,_, in_II contradistinction_NN1 to_II '_NULL classical_JJ Marxism_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Proponents_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 philosophical_JJ view_NN1 give_VV0 precedence_NN1 to_II structure_NN1 over_II objects_NN2 or_CC even_RR try_VV0 to_TO eliminate_VVI objects_NN2 altogether_RR (_( see_VV0 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, &lsqb;_( 4_MC ,_, 10_MC ,_, 13_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD U.S._NP1 Protestant_JJ missionaries_NN2 already_RR arrived_VVN in_II Guatemala_NP1 between_II 1900_MC and_CC 1935_MC ,_, starting_VVG churches_NN2 ,_, schools_NN2 ,_, and_CC clinics_NN2 (_( factors_NN2 1b_FO and_CC 1c_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR for_IF the_AT case_NN1 of_IO subcontrariety_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, they_PPHS2 also_RR determine_VV0 whether_CSW a_AT1 conversational_JJ agent_NN1 has_VHZ won_VVN the_AT strategic_JJ conversational_JJ game_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ one_MC1 important_JJ communicative_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO the_AT conversation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT other_JJ future_NN1 ,_, and_CC Taylor_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 preferred_JJ option_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ based_VVN on_II a_AT1 different_JJ assumption_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ maintains_VVZ that_CST '_NULL in_II our_APPGE religious_JJ lives_NN2 we_PPIS2 are_VBR responding_VVG to_II a_AT1 transcendent_JJ reality_NN1 '_NULL through_II our_APPGE search_NN1 for_IF '_NULL fullness_NN1 '_NULL (_( Taylor_NP1 2007_MC ,_, p._NN1 768_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 can_VM also_RR occur_VVI in_II sport_NN1 and_CC military_JJ circumstances_NN2 ,_, where_CS rapid_JJ ,_, non-deliberative_JJ response_NN1 to_II commands_NN2 is_VBZ a_AT1 crucial_JJ prerequisite_NN1 for_IF organized_JJ action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS TD_NN1 algorithms_NN2 are_VBR undoubtedly_RR fundamental_JJ to_II the_AT conspicuous_JJ success_NN1 of_IO reinforcement_NN1 learning_NN1 models_NN2 of_IO decision-making_NN1 and_CC to_II understanding_VVG its_APPGE neural_JJ basis_NN1 ,_, the_AT philosophical_JJ questions_NN2 about_II metarepresentation_NN1 arise_VV0 in_RP just_RR the_AT same_DA way_NN1 in_II cases_NN2 where_CS there_EX is_VBZ immediate_JJ feedback_NN1 for_IF each_DD1 choice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT circulation_NN1 of_IO commodities_NN2 is_VBZ the_AT starting-point_NN1 of_IO capital_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA I_PPIS1 pen_VV0 these_DD2 words_NN2 ,_, the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 celebrates_VVZ a_AT1 genocidal_JJ holiday_NN1 of_IO thanks_NN2 while_CS occupied_VVN Ferguson_NP1 burns_VVZ ,_, and_CC the_AT question_NN1 presses_NN2 upon_II us_PPIO2 :_: what_DDQ material_NN1 force_NN1 ,_, what_DDQ political_JJ unity_NN1 ,_, can_VM be_VBI crafted_VVN toward_II this_DD1 most_RGT urgent_JJ of_IO tasks_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, with_IW this_DD1 emphasis_NN1 on_II singularity_NN1 there_EX is_VBZ always_RR the_AT danger_NN1 of_IO falling_VVG back_RP on_II an_AT1 image_NN1 of_IO society_NN1 or_CC historical_JJ development_NN1 as_CSA just_RR an_AT1 agglomeration_NN1 of_IO singular_JJ essences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 direct_JJ implication_NN1 of_IO E=K_FO seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI that_RG false_JJ beliefs_NN2 can_VM not_XX justify_VVI other_JJ beliefs_NN2 ,_, for_IF no_AT false_JJ belief_NN1 can_VM be_VBI part_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 total_JJ evidence_NN1 and_CC one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 total_JJ evidence_NN1 is_VBZ what_DDQ inferentially_RR justifies_VVZ belief_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT sophist_NN1 is_VBZ said_VVN to_TO be_VBI '_NULL a_AT1 kind_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 juggler_NN1 ,_, an_AT1 imitator_NN1 of_IO realities_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 definition_NN1 ,_, Mitchell_NP1 inserts_VVZ the_AT caveat_NN1 '_NULL other_II21 than_II22 its_APPGE own_DA '_NULL because_CS many_DA2 animals_NN2 are_VBR able_JK to_TO use_VVI mirrors_NN2 for_IF the_AT purpose_NN1 of_IO locating_VVG objects_NN2 and_CC guiding_JJ their_APPGE movements_NN2 despite_II failing_VVG the_AT mark_NN1 test_NN1 and_CC not_XX displaying_VVG any_DD self-directed_JJ behaviour_NN1 (_( as_CSA noted_VVN in_II §2_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT effect_NN1 of_IO mainline_NN1 Protestant_NN1 affiliation_NN1 becomes_VVZ statistically_RR insignificant_JJ when_CS subcultural_JJ identity_NN1 or_CC sociodemographic_JJ controls_NN2 are_VBR added_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS U_ZZ1 =_FO 1_MC1 ,_, in_II M2n+1_FO ,_, no_RRQV31 matter_RRQV32 how_RRQV33 A_ZZ1 ,_, X1_FO ,_, ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. Finally_RR ,_, to_TO avoid_VVI ambiguity_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ desirable_JJ that_CST the_AT list_NN1 be_VBI preceded_VVN or_CC otherwise_RR accompanied_VVN by_II some_DD operator_NN1 whose_DDQGE job_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO signal_VVI that_CST the_AT overall_NN1 expression-i.e._REX ,_, the_AT list_NN1 together_RL with_IW the_AT operator-should_VM be_VBI read_VVN as_CSA denoting_VVG the_AT fusion_NN1 of_IO the_AT listed_JJ objects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 their_APPGE interpretation_NN1 of_IO history_NN1 ,_, the_AT struggle_NN1 between_II "_" Confucians_NN2 "_" and_CC "_" Legalists_NN2 "_" went_VVD back_RP to_II the_AT Spring_NN1 and_CC Autumn_NNT1 period_NN1 (_( Chunqiu_NP1 ,_, 770-453_MCMC B.C.E._NP1 )_) and_CC continued_VVD uninterruptedly_RR thenceforth_RR well_RR into_II the_AT age_NN1 of_IO the_AT People_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 Republic_NN1 ,_, when_CS it_PPH1 emerged_VVD into_II the_AT "_" struggle_NN1 between_II the_AT two_MC lines_NN2 "_" in_II the_AT Communist_JJ Party_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 leads_VVZ me_PPIO1 to_II an_AT1 important_JJ element_NN1 still_RR missing_VVG from_II my_APPGE account_NN1 as_CSA laid_VVN out_RP thus_RR far_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT free_JJ case_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ no_AT way_NN1 to_TO fix_VVI the_AT corresponding_JJ charge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT evidence_NN1 is_VBZ mixed_VVN and_CC outcomes_NN2 may_VM depend_VVI on_II a_AT1 range_NN1 of_IO contextual_JJ and_CC individual_JJ variables_NN2 ,_, but_CCB overall_JJ correlations_NN2 between_II scientific_JJ literacy_NN1 or_CC formal_JJ education_NN1 levels_NN2 and_CC acceptance_NN1 of_IO evolution_NN1 are_VBR low_JJ in_II studies_NN2 from_II the_AT US_NP1 (_( Berkman_NP1 and_CC Plutzer_NP1 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM identify_VVI the_AT proper_JJ function_NN1 of_IO shutting_VVG down_RP the_AT immune_JJ system_NN1 in_II male_JJ antechinus_NN1 during_II the_AT breeding_NN1 season_NNT1 :_: it_PPH1 is_VBZ to_TO free_VVI up_RP energy_NN1 for_IF sperm_NN production_NN1 ,_, fighting_VVG ,_, and_CC copulating_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Either_DD1 way_NN1 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 here_RL an_AT1 erroneous_JJ causal_JJ connection_NN1 between_II the_AT wearing_VVG the_AT white_JJ shirt_NN1 and_CC the_AT result_NN1 of_IO the_AT next_MD game_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, maintaining_VVG the_AT priority_NN1 of_IO practice_NN1 over_II theory_NN1 is_VBZ at_II the_AT heart_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ we_PPIS2 might_VM call_VVI the_AT cultivation_NN1 of_IO Marxist_JJ practical_JJ reason_NN1 in_II the_AT service_NN1 of_IO working-class_JJ self-emancipation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT only_JJ di_FW ?_? erence_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST clauses_NN2 of_IO the_AT form_NN1 "_" d_ZZ1 D_ZZ1 "_" are_VBR replaced_VVN by_II ones_NN2 of_IO the_AT form_NN1 "_" d_ZZ1 ∈_FO D_ZZ1 "_" While_CS Gadamer_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 dialogical_JJ hermeneutics_NN1 does_VDZ much_DA1 to_TO solve_VVI this_DD1 problem_NN1 the_AT question_NN1 remains_VVZ as_II21 to_II22 how_RRQ the_AT individuality_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ is_VBZ to_TO be_VBI understood_VVN can_VM be_VBI grasped_VVN in_II interpretation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, an_AT1 idol_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT shaping_NN1 of_IO things_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 no_AT real_JJ existence_NN1 nor_CC the_AT slightest_JJT essential_JJ foundation_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 these_DD2 sensible_JJ forms_NN2 that_CST the_AT atheistic_JJ stupidity_NN1 of_IO the_AT Greeks_NN2 shaped_VVN -_- tritons_NN2 ,_, centaurs_NN2 and_CC all_DB these_DD2 fantasies_NN2 without_IW being_VBG ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 might_VM describe_VVI the_AT error_NN1 in_II two_MC ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Bolsheviks_NN2 alone_RR called_VVN for_IF '_NULL All_DB Power_NN1 to_II the_AT Soviets_NN2 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Those_DD2 who_PNQS are_VBR attracted_VVN to_II the_AT Bayesian_JJ framework_NN1 still_RR need_VV0 a_AT1 substantive_JJ account_VVI of_IO undercutting_VVG defeat_NN1 -_- and_CC there_EX is_VBZ no_AT reason_NN1 why_RRQ such_DA a_AT1 theorist_NN1 might_VM not_XX use_VVI EAD_NN1 as_CSA that_DD1 substantive_JJ account_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT real-world_JJ valid_JJ arguments_NN2 are_VBR akin_JJ to_II generalisations_NN2 concerning_II the_AT subject_NN1 matter_NN1 of_IO the_AT chosen_JJ invariant_JJ terminology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 controls_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD few_DA2 significant_JJ effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT future_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 need_VV0 digital_JJ databases_NN2 that_CST better_JJR cover_NN1 several_DA2 languages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 points_VVZ out_RP that_CST an_AT1 '_NULL ought_VMK '_NULL claim_NN1 might_VM very_RG well_RR be_VBI false_JJ (_( or_CC ,_, he_PPHS1 argues_VVZ ,_, true_JJ )_) without_IW the_AT presupposed_JJ sentence_NN1 being_VBG true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT US_NP1 ,_, the_AT data_NN on_II live_JJ birth_NN1 rates_NN2 is_VBZ provided_VVN by_II age_NN1 group_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 have_VH0 argued_VVN that_CST the_AT objections_NN2 related_VVN to_II determinism_NN1 raised_VVN against_II the_AT at-at_II theory_NN1 of_IO motion_NN1 are_VBR unfounded_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 also_RR that_CST the_AT representation_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 of_IO these_DD2 distinct_JJ acts_NN2 can_VM potentially_RR have_VHI an_AT1 effect_NN1 on_II the_AT faculty_NN1 of_IO desire_NN1 ,_, serving_VVG as_II an_AT1 incentive_NN1 that_CST checks_VVZ hindering_VVG inclinations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS designing_VVG new_JJ living-quarters_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, workers_NN2 would_VM not_XX be_VBI consulted_VVN by_II party_NN1 administrators_NN2 and_CC planners_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT squatters_NN2 '_NULL and_CC settlers_NN2 '_NULL movement_NN1 on_II the_AT outskirts_NN2 of_IO Vienna_NP1 was_VBDZ greeted_VVN with_IW suspicion_NN1 '_NULL because_CS it_PPH1 was_VBDZ spontaneous_JJ and_CC outside_II the_AT party_NN1 structure_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II 2004_MC ,_, Ayaan_NP1 Hirsi_NP1 Ali_NP1 ,_, a_AT1 former_DA Somalian_JJ refugee_NN1 ,_, ex-Muslim_JJ and_CC Dutch_JJ politician_NN1 ,_, together_RL with_IW Theo_NP1 van_NP1 Gogh_NP1 ,_, broadcasted_VVD an_AT1 Islam-critical_JJ movie_NN1 called_VVN '_NULL Submission_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ violent_JJ Quran_NN1 texts_NN2 were_VBDR written_VVN over_II a_AT1 naked_JJ female_JJ body_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR the_AT temporal_JJ structure_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 position_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT same_DA -_- linear_JJ ,_, homogeneous_JJ time_NNT1 sweeps_VVZ us_PPIO2 alternately_RR toward_II ecstatic_JJ celebration_NN1 or_CC infinite_JJ despair_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_PN1 could_VM also_RR argue_VVI that_CST a_AT1 preoccupation_NN1 with_IW access_NN1 to_II the_AT lion_NN1 throne_NN1 in_II the_AT same_DA sutras_NN2 forms_VVZ a_AT1 similar_JJ generic_JJ feature_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 texts_NN2 for_IF the_AT same_DA reason_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II the_AT outcome_NN1 set_NN1 (_( Hansson_NP1 2013a_FO )_) is_VBZ meant_VVN the_AT set_NN1 of_IO actually_RR chosen_VVN outcomes_NN2 ,_, i.e._REX the_AT set_NN1 of_IO belief_NN1 sets_NN2 X_ZZ1 for_IF which_DDQ there_EX exists_VVZ a_AT1 descriptor_NN1 with_IW X=K°X=K°_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Piketty_NN1 was_VBDZ brought_VVN up_RP in_II Clichy_NP1 in_II a_AT1 mainly_RR working-class_JJ district_NN1 and_CC his_APPGE parents_NN2 were_VBDR both_RR militant_JJ members_NN2 of_IO Lutte_NP1 Ouvriere_NP1 Workers_NN2 '_NULL Struggle_VV0 ;_; a_AT1 Trotskyist_JJ party_NN1 which_DDQ still_RR has_VHZ a_AT1 significant_JJ following_NN1 in_II France_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 focus_VV0 our_APPGE attention_NN1 on_II a_AT1 particular_JJ one_PN1 of_IO these_DD2 narratives_NN2 that_CST we_PPIS2 suggest_VV0 is_VBZ especially_RR likely_JJ to_TO influence_VVI the_AT pornography-effect_JJ scripts_NN2 of_IO husbands_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR exposed_VVN to_II this_DD1 narrative_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 would_VM be_VBI inclined_JJ to_TO think_VVI that_CST the_AT person_NN1 was_VBDZ incompetent_JJ or_CC obtuse_JJ ,_, not_XX rational_JJ and_CC cooperative_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR the_AT protection_NN1 force_NN1 carries_VVZ out_RP actual_JJ struggle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA lingering_JJ or_CC tarrying_VVG with_IW the_AT artwork_NN1 is_VBZ necessary_JJ for_IF a_AT1 transformative_JJ experience_NN1 to_TO occur_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Realism_NN1 is_VBZ furthermore_RR central_JJ to_II Gaskin_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 distinction_NN1 between_II text_NN1 and_CC work_VV0 :_: the_AT former_DA is_VBZ an_AT1 abstract_JJ possibility_NN1 ,_, the_AT latter_DA a_AT1 realization_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 possibility_NN1 by_II a_AT1 particular_JJ author_NN1 at_II a_AT1 particular_JJ time_NNT1 and_CC a_AT1 particular_JJ place_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Often_RR ,_, these_DD2 presses_NN2 ,_, reviewers_NN2 and_CC editors_NN2 reject_VV0 manuscripts_NN2 from_II the_AT global_JJ south_ND1 for_IF whatever_DDQV reason_NN1 other_II21 than_II22 quality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT first_MD sense_NN1 ,_, Bradford_NP1 is_VBZ right_JJ to_TO say_VVI that_CST '_NULL some_DD people_NN can_VM try_VVI harder_RRR than_CSN others_NN2 '_NULL ;_; in_II the_AT second_MD sense_NN1 this_DD1 is_VBZ not_XX only_RR false_JJ ,_, but_CCB necessarily_RR so_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, though_CS I_PPIS1 have_VH0 glossed_VVN semantic_JJ features_NN2 as_CSA that_DD1 '_NULL book_NN1 '_NULL can_VM be_VBI used_VVN to_TO refer_VVI an_AT1 artifact_NN1 ,_, where_CS I_PPIS1 am_VBM using_VVG an_AT1 expression_NN1 '_NULL refers_VVZ '_NULL that_CST picks_VVZ out_RP what_DDQ is_VBZ for_IF Chomsky_NP1 at_RR21 least_RR22 a_AT1 three-place_JJ relation_NN1 between_II a_AT1 speaker_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 word_NN1 and_CC something_PN1 in_II the_AT world_NN1 ,_, semantic_JJ features_NN2 must_VM be_VBI understood_VVN completely_RR internally_RR ,_, as_CSA being_VBG part_NN1 of_IO the_AT I-language_NN1 and_CC so_RR part_NN1 of_IO the_AT state_NN1 of_IO the_AT brain_NN1 of_IO the_AT language_NN1 user_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_II21 of_II22 the_AT limited_JJ space_NN1 available_JJ here_RL ,_, this_DD1 article_NN1 will_VM take_VVI the_AT form_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 microstudy_NN1 focusing_VVG on_II the_AT aforementioned_JJ two_MC jurists_NN2 ,_, namely_REX Shihb_NP1 alDn_NN1 alQarf_NN1 (_( d._NNU 1285_MC )_) and_CC Ibn_NP1 alQayyim_NN1 (_( d._NNU 1350_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, Brahmanism_NN1 and_CC Buddhism_NN1 more_RGR comprehensively_RR embrace_VV0 mystical_JJ compassion_NN1 since_CS Christianity_NN1 did_VDD not_XX extend_VVI its_APPGE sense_NN1 of_IO mystical_JJ unity_NN1 to_II animals_NN2 :_: "_" That_CST the_AT morals_NN2 of_IO Christianity_NN1 pay_VV0 no_AT regard_NN1 to_II animals_NN2 is_VBZ a_AT1 deficiency_NN1 in_II them_PPHO2 that_CST it_PPH1 is_VBZ better_JJR to_TO admit_VVI than_CSN to_TO perpetuate_VVI ,_, and_CC something_PN1 we_PPIS2 must_VM be_VBI all_DB the_AT more_RGR surprised_JJ at_II ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 these_DD2 morals_NN2 otherwise_RR show_VV0 the_AT greatest_JJT agreement_NN1 with_IW those_DD2 of_IO Brahmanism_NN1 and_CC Buddhism_NN1 "_" (_( BGE_NP1 241_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT major_JJ way_NN1 of_IO concentrating_VVG landed_JJ estates_NN2 was_VBDZ not_XX via_II economic_JJ means_NN ,_, but_CCB rather_RR through_II appropriating_VVG them_PPHO2 via_II political_JJ power_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, in_II the_AT two-coin_JJ example_NN1 we_PPIS2 should_VM thus_RR say_VVI that_CST all_DB heads_NN2 in_II the_AT second_MD sequence_NN1 has_VHZ a_AT1 different_JJ chance_NN1 than_CSN all_DB heads_NN2 in_II the_AT first_MD sequence_NN1 from_II the_AT second_MD toss_NN1 onwards_RL ,_, even_CS21 though_CS22 both_DB2 sequences_NN2 of_IO tosses_NN2 proceed_VV0 in_II parallel_NN1 and_CC are_VBR isomorphic_JJ events_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT element_NN1 of_IO Football_NN1 Game_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ shared_VVN by_II cases_NN2 of_IO coercion_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT coerced_JJ person_NN1 ,_, Jane_NP1 ,_, must_VM choose_VVI between_II doing_VDG what_DDQ the_AT coercer_NN1 ,_, John_NP1 ,_, wants_VVZ her_PPHO1 to_TO do_VDI and_CC some_DD bad_JJ alternative_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Individuation_NN1 of_IO perceptual_JJ states_NN2 and_CC perceptual_JJ attributives_NN2 is_VBZ conditioned_VVN by_II the_AT perspective_NN1 yielded_VVN by_II ways_NN2 light_NN1 strikes_VVZ the_AT retina_NN1 ,_, even_RR assuming_VVG that_CST the_AT attribution_NN1 is_VBZ of_IO an_AT1 attribute_NN1 represented_VVN as_CSA being_VBG in_II a_AT1 position_NN1 in_II distal_JJ space_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Second_MD International_JJ parties_NN2 ,_, in_II his_APPGE analysis_NN1 ,_, had_VHD abandoned_VVN this_DD1 fundamental_JJ Marxist_JJ tenet_NN1 in_II31 favour_II32 of_II33 Lassallean_JJ statism_NN1 ;_; the_AT notion_NN1 that_CST the_AT Party_NN1 will_VM bring_VVI about_RP the_AT new_JJ order_NN1 through_II the_AT power_NN1 of_IO the_AT state_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
You_PPY ask_VV0 them_PPHO2 a_AT1 series_NN of_IO "_" What_DDQ if_CS ..._... ?_? "_" questions_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT different_JJ possibilities_NN2 corresponding_VVG to_II the_AT direction_NN1 associated_VVN with_IW the_AT degree_NN1 of_IO freedom_NN1 are_VBR physically_RR distinguishable_JJ ,_, and_CC so_RR must_VM be_VBI counted_VVN as_CSA distinct_JJ possibilities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_RGQV31 matter_RGQV32 how_RGQV33 real_JJ your_APPGE dream_NN1 seems_VVZ ,_, as_CS31 soon_CS32 as_CS33 you_PPY wake_VV0 ,_, you_PPY can_VM not_XX continue_VVI the_AT experience_NN1 of_IO interacting_VVG in_II the_AT dream_NN1 with_IW others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Early_RR on_RP ,_, Hever_NP1 positions_VVZ himself_PPX1 against_II the_AT notion_NN1 that_CST Israel_NP1 takes_VVZ advantage_NN1 of_IO its_APPGE military_JJ control_NN1 to_TO '_NULL exploit_VVI the_AT Palestinian_JJ economy_NN1 ,_, labor_NN1 ,_, and_CC resources_NN2 '_NULL ,_, arguing_VVG that_CST such_DA an_AT1 analysis_NN1 springs_NN2 more_RRR from_II a_AT1 '_NULL pro-Palestinian_JJ '_NULL political_JJ orientation_NN1 than_CSN it_PPH1 does_VDZ from_II serious_JJ engagement_NN1 with_IW economic_JJ data_NN (_( p._NN1 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Persons_NN2 in_II the_AT North_ND1 Central_JJ region_NN1 and_CC urban_JJ Southern_JJ residents_NN2 are_VBR similar_JJ in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 frequency_NN1 of_IO congregational_JJ activities_NN2 ,_, private_JJ prayer_NN1 and_CC requests_NN2 for_IF prayer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC if_CS such_DA expressions_NN2 determine_VV0 metaphorical_JJ content_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI odd_JJ if_CS they_PPHS2 could_VM be_VBI part_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM see_VVI intuitively_RR that_CST the_AT local_JJ temporal_JJ relabelling_JJ symmetry_NN1 (_( which_DDQ we_PPIS2 understand_VV0 to_TO be_VBI explicitly_RR foliation_NN1 changing_VVG )_) is_VBZ in_II conflict_NN1 with_IW three-dimensional_JJ scale_NN1 invariance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perhaps_RR neurons_NN2 possess_VV0 representational_JJ capacities_NN2 missing_VVG in_II other_JJ mechanisms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR some_DD decisions_NN2 that_CST others_NN2 need_VV0 to_TO make_VVI ,_, and_CC we_PPIS2 should_VM not_XX allow_VVI them_PPHO2 to_TO grant_VVI us_PPIO2 the_AT role_NN1 of_IO decider_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF these_DD2 reasons_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 theory_NN1 of_IO counterpublics_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN attractive_JJ to_II many_DA2 radical_JJ ,_, progressive_JJ ,_, and_CC Marxist_JJ activists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ can_VM we_PPIS2 say_VVI about_II these_DD2 objections_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_II these_DD2 reasonings_NN2 the_AT available_JJ information_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX necessarily_RR a_AT1 crisp_JJ set_NN1 and_CC the_AT conclusions_NN2 are_VBR not_XX necessarily_RR at_II degree_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT '_NULL heads_NN2 '_NULL side_NN1 bears_VVZ an_AT1 impression_NN1 of_IO the_AT goddess_NN1 Athena_NP1 ,_, while_CS the_AT reverse_NN1 carries_VVZ an_AT1 image_NN1 of_IO her_APPGE owl_NN1 next_II21 to_II22 an_AT1 olive_JJ sprig_NN1 (_( perhaps_RR designating_VVG one_MC1 of_IO Athens_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 major_JJ exports_NN2 ,_, olive_JJ oil_NN1 )_) and_CC three_MC Greek_JJ letters_NN2 ,_, alpha_NN1 ,_, theta_NN1 ,_, and_CC epsilon_NN1 ,_, with_IW the_AT theta_NN1 appearing_VVG as_II an_AT1 '_NULL O_ZZ1 '_NULL with_IW a_AT1 dot_NN1 in_II the_AT middle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Johnson_NP1 here_RL refers_VVZ to_II a_AT1 view_NN1 more_RGR commonly_RR held_VVN in_II philosophy_NN1 departments_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, and_CC finds_VVZ that_DD1 deductivism_NN1 is_VBZ "_" seemingly_RR hard-wired_JJ into_II logic_NN1 "_" &lsqb;_( Johnson_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ,_, p._NN1 19_MC &rsqb;_) ,_, calling_VVG logic_NN1 the_AT alleged_JJ gold_NN1 standard_NN1 for_IF good_JJ arguments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 discuss_VV0 such_DA excuses_NN2 in_II §11_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Setting_VVG strange_JJ cases_NN2 aside_RL ,_, fictional_JJ objects_NN2 are_VBR a-incomplete_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 argue_VV0 that_DD1 mirror_NN1 self-recognition_NN1 demonstrates_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 creature_NN1 is_VBZ objectively_RR self-aware_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS Hansen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 name_NN1 reading_NN1 of_IO the_AT three_MC standards_NN2 of_IO doctrine_NN1 may_VM be_VBI more_RGR plausible_JJ than_CSN the_AT traditional_JJ interpretation_NN1 of_IO the_AT standards_NN2 as_CSA three_MC tests_NN2 of_IO truth_NN1 ,_, the_AT texts_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX favor_VVI a_AT1 name_NN1 reading_VVG over_RP a_AT1 discourse_NN1 reading_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sometime_RT after_II Dick_NP1 finished_VVD eating_NN1 ,_, Spot_NN1 began_VVD to_TO bark_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Internal_JJ questions_NN2 are_VBR theoretical_JJ matters_NN2 for_IF science_NN1 and_CC can_VM be_VBI tested_VVN empirically_RR ,_, while_CS external_JJ questions_NN2 are_VBR practical_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ often_RR unclear_JJ that_CST one_PN1 can_VM even_RR distinguish_VVI sources_NN2 of_IO practical_JJ indecision_NN1 as_CSA reflecting_VVG multiple_JJ credences_NN2 rather_II21 than_II22 multiple_JJ values_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_DAT were_VBDR imported_VVN but_CCB over_II time_NNT1 the_AT colonies_NN2 began_VVD to_TO develop_VVI their_APPGE own_DA manufacturing_NN1 capacity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 amounts_VVZ to_II a_AT1 kind_NN1 of_IO "_" black_JJ and_CC white_JJ thinking_NN1 "_" or_CC "_" moral_JJ rigorism_NN1 "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
Now_RT it_PPH1 certainly_RR does_VDZ seem_VVI that_CST here_RL Wollheim_NP1 understands_VVZ Dickie_NP1 to_TO be_VBI taking_VVG the_AT artworld_NN1 to_TO operate_VVI as_II a_AT1 formal_JJ institution_NN1 ,_, presumably_RR with_IW a_AT1 constitution_NN1 ,_, officers_NN2 ,_, bylaws_NN2 ,_, and_RR31 so_RR32 on_RR33 ,_, and_CC nothing_PN1 in_II Dickie_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 bare_JJ statement_NN1 of_IO the_AT theory_NN1 does_VDZ much_DA1 ,_, if_CS anything_PN1 ,_, to_TO dispel_VVI this_DD1 erroneous_JJ impression_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC can_VM this_DD1 growth_NN1 rate_NN1 be_VBI considered_VVN independent_JJ of_IO the_AT capital_NN1 stock_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Abaelard_NN1 reports_VVZ the_AT argument_NN1 given_VVN in_II the_AT C8_FO complex_NN1 that_CST the_AT generalissimum_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI related_VVN to_II an_AT1 item_NN1 in_II another_DD1 category_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 variant_NN1 of_IO the_AT argument_NN1 that_CST it_PPH1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI referred_VVN to_II an_AT1 item_NN1 in_II its_APPGE own_DA category_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Franz_NP1 Borkenau_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 view_NN1 ,_, the_AT adoption_NN1 of_IO united-front_JJ tactics_NN2 required_VVN erecting_VVG an_AT1 '_NULL infallible_JJ authority_NN1 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL mechanical_JJ obedience_NN1 to_II orders_NN2 from_II above_RL '_NULL ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 '_NULL the_AT Russians_NN2 themselves_PPX2 seriously_RR disagreed_VVD on_II every_AT1 important_JJ step_NN1 '_NULL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT weaker_JJR claim_NN1 is_VBZ all_DB I_PPIS1 need_VV0 for_IF my_APPGE argument_NN1 against_II Elga_NP1 (_( 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II Proposition_NN1 3.8_MC ,_, fix_VV0 a_AT1 ,_, b_ZZ1 S_ZZ1 such_CS21 that_CS22 <T>_FO and_CC for_IF all_DB x_ZZ1 S_ZZ1 one_MC1 has_VHZ ax_NN1 =_FO bx_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB perhaps_RR most_RGT striking_JJ is_VBZ the_AT degree_NN1 to_II which_DDQ Aric6_FO '_NULL s_ZZ1 language_NN1 had_VHD acquired_VVN postmodern_JJ overtones_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Through_II Jürgen_NP1 Habermas_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 work_VV0 in_II political_JJ philosophy_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 modified_JJ and_CC some_DD say_VV0 an_AT1 improved_JJ &lsqb;_( see_VV0 Goodnight_UH ,_, 2006_MC &rsqb;_) version_NN1 of_IO Toulmin_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ideas_NN2 entered_VVD political_JJ science_NN1 and_CC sociology_NN1 ,_, among_II others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Trustworthiness_NN1 involves_VVZ responding_VVG to_II reasonable_JJ or_CC appropriate_JJ normative_JJ expectations_NN2 ,_, but_CCB this_DD1 returns_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_II the_AT question_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ makes_VVZ such_DA expectations_NN2 appropriate_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF present_JJ purposes_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ sufficient_JJ to_TO proceed_VVI on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO the_AT very_JJ well-supported_NN1 claims_VVZ that_CST racial_JJ oppression_NN1 did_VDD not_XX exist_VVI for_IF most_DAT of_IO human_JJ history_NN1 and_CC that_DD1 capitalist_JJ colonialism_NN1 was_VBDZ extremely_RR important_JJ in_II forging_VVG racial_JJ oppression_NN1 and_CC diffusing_VVG it_PPH1 globally_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS such_DA experiences_NN2 exist_VV0 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX difficult_JJ to_TO imagine_VVI that_CST they_PPHS2 would_VM generate_VVI dispositions_NN2 to_TO judge_VVI that_DD1 visual_JJ experiences_NN2 play_VV0 important_JJ causal_JJ roles_NN2 in_II overt_JJ action_NN1 control_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT question-_NN1 "_" If_CS my_APPGE mind_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX possess_VVI li_MC ,_, how_RRQ could_VM it_PPH1 be_VBI that_CST when_CS a_AT1 thing_NN1 arrives_VVZ ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 response_NN1 (_( ying_VVG )_) to_II it_PPH1 ?_? "_" –_- asks_VVZ one_PN1 to_TO articulate_VVI the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II the_AT mind-which_DDQ possesses_VVZ li-and_CC the_AT external_JJ world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, I_PPIS1 provide_VV0 a_AT1 sustained_JJ critique_NN1 of_IO the_AT purported_JJ '_NULL need_NN1 '_NULL for_IF geneticallyrelated_JJ children_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 critique_NN1 of_IO Luxemburg_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 most_RGT problematic_JJ interventions_NN2 ,_, this_DD1 article_NN1 admittedly_RR does_VDZ not_XX focus_VVI on_II her_APPGE many_DA2 strongpoints_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ include_VV0 a_AT1 dedication_NN1 to_II revolutionary_JJ Marxism_NN1 ,_, internationalism_NN1 ,_, anti-militarism_NN1 ,_, and_CC working-class_JJ self-activity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Across_II the_AT country_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ ,_, in_II various_JJ languages_NN2 ,_, becoming_VVG an_AT1 increasingly_RR important_JJ way_NN1 of_IO thinking_VVG about_II resilience_NN1 and_CC striving_VVG ,_, often_RR in_II contexts_NN2 in_II which_DDQ women_NN2 played_VVD a_AT1 significant_JJ role_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC this_DD1 latter_DA determination_NN1 failure_NN1 is_VBZ one_PN1 that_CST holds_VVZ independently_RR of_IO how_RRQ or_CC if_CS we_PPIS2 represent_VV0 the_AT relevant_JJ issues_NN2 ,_, thus_RR keeping_VVG with_IW Martha_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 metaphysical_JJ stance_NN1 on_II the_AT relevant_JJ indeterminacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 observed_VVN (_( E1_FO ,_, x_ZZ1 )_) &lsqb;_( such_CS21 that_CS22 some_DD (_( E2_FO ,_, y0_FO )_) has_VHZ the_AT same_DA likelihood_NN1 function_NN1 &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT pluralism_NN1 of_IO Shaftesbury_NP1 and_CC Wolff_NP1 is_VBZ then_RT supplemented_VVN by_II the_AT recurrent_JJ thought_NN1 ,_, promoted_VVN early_RR on_RP ,_, notably_RR by_II Addison_NP1 ,_, that_CST we_PPIS2 take_VV0 great_JJ aesthetic_JJ pleasure_NN1 through_II the_AT exercise_NN1 of_IO imagination_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
His_APPGE claim_NN1 about_II the_AT common-sense_NN1 duty_NN1 of_IO benevolence_NN1 was_VBDZ in_RR21 part_RR22 an_AT1 attempt_NN1 to_TO show_VVI that_CST his_APPGE third_MD axiom_NN1 is_VBZ widely_RR accepted_VVN ,_, but_CCB ,_, as_CSA I_PPIS1 have_VH0 said_VVN ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX persuasive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 may_VM even_RR be_VBI true_JJ that_CST the_AT deliberative_JJ phenomena_NN2 are_VBR more_RGR central_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Or_CC he_PPHS1 will_VM claim_VVI that_DD1 impact_NN1 is_VBZ really_RR scattering_VVG caused_VVN by_II short-range_JJ ,_, action-at-a-distance_JJ repulsive_JJ force_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 individual_JJ concepts_NN2 are_VBR so_RR intertwined_VVN that_CST every_AT1 canonical_JJ artist_NN1 or_CC writer_NN1 routinely_RR cited_VVN by_II several_DA2 authors_NN2 in_II the_AT Paul_NP1 and_CC Kaufman_NP1 volume_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, is_VBZ conceived_VVN to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 combined_JJ paradigm_NN1 of_IO all_DB three_MC :_: Nanay_NP1 cites_VVZ Mozart_NP1 and_CC Marcel_NP1 Duchamp_NP1 ;_; Simon_NP1 Blackburn_NP1 cites_VVZ Bernini_NP1 ,_, Titian_NP1 ,_, Shakespeare_NP1 ,_, Coleridge_NP1 ,_, Henry_NP1 James_NP1 ,_, Charles_NP1 Darwin_NP1 ,_, and_CC Einstein_NP1 ;_; Matthew_NP1 Kieran_NP1 cites_VVZ Picasso_NP1 ,_, Einstein_NP1 ,_, Mozart_NP1 ,_, Caravaggio_NP1 ,_, and_CC van_NP1 Gogh_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Model_NN1 8_MC is_VBZ the_AT fully_RR specified_VVN model_NN1 ,_, and_CC we_PPIS2 focus_VV0 on_II the_AT results_NN2 presented_VVN in_II Model_NN1 8_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT Fourth_MD Set_NN1 of_IO Replies_NN2 he_PPHS1 stresses_VVZ that_CST attributes_VVZ inhere_NN1 in_II substance_NN1 (_( CSM_NP1 II_MC ,_, 156/AT_FU VII_MC ,_, 222_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reading_VVG '_NULL the_AT moment_NN1 of_IO Gramsci_JJ '_NULL as_CSA it_PPH1 has_VHZ actually_RR unfolded_VVN since_CS the_AT 1960s_MC2 in_II a_AT1 strictly_RR '_NULL philological_JJ '_NULL manner_NN1 ,_, and_CC placing_VVG such_DA emphasis_NN1 on_II the_AT critiques_NN2 of_IO Althusser_NP1 and_CC Anderson_NP1 runs_VVZ the_AT risk_NN1 of_IO casting_VVG important_JJ elements_NN2 out_II21 of_II22 the_AT history_NN1 of_IO Gramsci_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reception_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 study_NN1 suffered_VVN from_II a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO methodological_JJ flaws_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS we_PPIS2 are_VBR to_TO summarize_VVI the_AT trends_NN2 of_IO discussing_VVG Shang_NP1 Yang_NP1 throughout_II the_AT Han_NP1 ,_, we_PPIS2 may_VM distinguish_VVI three_MC major_JJ approaches_NN2 :_: the_AT predominantly_RR critical_JJ one_PN1 ,_, the_AT one_PN1 that_CST combined_JJ praise_NN1 with_IW criticism_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT eulogizing_JJ one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, if_CS a_AT1 famous_JJ painting_NN1 is_VBZ kept_VVN in_II a_AT1 private_JJ home_NN1 instead_II21 of_II22 in_II a_AT1 public_JJ museum_NN1 ,_, then_RT it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI more_RGR special_JJ of_IO an_AT1 experience_NN1 to_TO go_VVI and_CC see_VVI it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
His_APPGE despair_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 essential_JJ component_NN1 to_II producing_VVG a_AT1 better_JJR world_NN1 or_CC even_RR to_II the_AT existence_NN1 of_IO Adam_NP1 and_CC Carol_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 shared_JJ feelings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT argument_NN1 needs_VVZ to_TO be_VBI formulated_VVN using_VVG metaphysical_JJ necessity_NN1 throughout_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 asked_VVD timely_JJ questions_NN2 about_II how_RRQ ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, youth_NN1 in_II Senegal_NP1 insert_VV0 global_JJ music_NN1 genres_NN2 like_II Hip-Hop_NP1 into_II local_JJ pious_JJ circles_NN2 and_CC practices_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 Sufi_NN1 (_( mystic_NN1 )_) movement_NN1 and_CC adapt_VV0 this_DD1 genre_NN1 to_TO best_RRT fit_VVI their_APPGE needs_NN2 and_CC requirements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, dao_NN1 accomplishes_VVZ all_DB things_NN2 but_CCB rejects_VVZ the_AT attitude_NN1 of_IO controlling_VVG ,_, possessing_VVG ,_, and_CC lording_VVG over_II them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR it_PPH1 seems_VVZ natural_JJ to_TO suppose_VVI that_CST the_AT impossibility_NN1 which_DDQ is_VBZ stated_VVN in_II (_( LCN*_FO )_) has_VHZ its_APPGE real_JJ ground_NN1 in_II the_AT object_NN1 to_II which_DDQ a_AT1 disputation_NN1 refers_VVZ :_: it_PPH1 is_VBZ impossible_JJ of_IO this_DD1 very_JJ object_NN1 to_TO belong_VVI to_II both_DB2 alternatives_NN2 (_( to_II one_MC1 term_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE negation_NN1 )_) at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA for_IF dedicated_JJ seriousness_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 involves_VVZ a_AT1 serious_JJ and_CC respectful_JJ attitude_NN1 toward_II the_AT object_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE study_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 dedication_NN1 to_II consciously_RR minimizing_VVG the_AT influence_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE own_DA habits_NN2 of_IO thought_NN1 ,_, and_CC taking_VVG seriously_RR the_AT distinctive_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT Confucians_NN2 '_NULL own_DA concerns_NN2 and_CC activities_NN2 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 their_APPGE life_NN1 experiences_NN2 in_II such_DA a_AT1 context_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hensman_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 conception_NN1 of_IO the_AT state_NN1 and_CC capital_NN1 also_RR informs_VVZ her_APPGE position_NN1 on_II revolutionary_JJ strategy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II what_DDQ '_NULL s_ZZ1 to_TO come_VVI I_ZZ1 '_NULL m_ZZ1 going_VVGK to_TO talk_VVI not_XX only_RR about_II junk_NN1 subject_NN1 matters_NN2 but_CCB junk_NN1 propositions_NN2 and_CC junk_NN1 beliefs_NN2 as_RR21 well_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ article_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT end_NN1 of_IO the_AT story_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT project_NN1 of_IO acting_VVG autonomously_RR is_VBZ just_RR the_AT project_NN1 of_IO becoming_VVG a_AT1 Real_JJ Self_NN1 ,_, then_RT we_PPIS2 are_VBR bound_VVNK to_TO be_VBI disappointed-not_XX least_RRT because_CS we_PPIS2 all_DB must_VM die_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Space_NN1 and_CC time_NNT1 are_VBR complex_JJ ;_; but_CCB while_CS perceptual_JJ experiences_NN2 represent_VV0 spatial_JJ and_CC temporal_JJ relations_NN2 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ nothing_PN1 particularly_RR complex_JJ about_II the_AT characteristic_JJ phenomenology_NN1 of_IO the_AT representation_NN1 of_IO spatial_JJ and_CC temporal_JJ relations_NN2 (_( for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 no_AT trouble_NN1 imagining_VVG cognitively_RR unsophisticated_JJ creatures_NN2 like_II dogs_NN2 having_VHG experiences_NN2 with_IW such_DA phenomenology_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, to_TO conclude_VVI ,_, (_( P2_FO )_) and_CC Fine_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 pure_JJ logic_NN1 encode_VV0 different_JJ conceptions_NN2 of_IO the_AT relationships_NN2 between_II weak_JJ and_CC strict_JJ grounding_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Again_RT ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 restriction_NN1 in_II the_AT statement_NN1 of_IO 6.3_MC as_CSA given_VVN in_II loc_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Carnap_VV0 and_CC Lukasiewicz_NP1 viewed_VVD the_AT derivation_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 rejection_NN1 in_II different_JJ ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT summer_NNT1 of_IO 2012_MC ,_, the_AT broadcasting_NN1 of_IO the_AT 25_MC min_NNU documentary_NN1 '_NULL Femme_NN1 de_FW la_FW Rue_NP1 '_NULL by_II film_NN1 student_NN1 Sofie_NP1 Peeters_VVZ caused_VVN a_AT1 stir_NN1 across_II Dutch-_NN1 and_CC Frenchspeaking_VVG media_NN and_CC political_JJ debate_NN1 followed_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS the_AT Cowlitz_NP1 Salmon_NP1 Hatchery_NP1 opened_VVD (_( in_II 1968_MC )_) it_PPH1 was_VBDZ the_AT largest_JJT salmon_NN hatchery_NN1 in_II the_AT world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 does_VDZ not_XX matter_VVI for_IF fit_JJ concerning_II coin_NN1 flips_VVZ how_RRQ H_ZZ1 or_CC H1_FO -_- H2_FO follow_VV0 from_II the_AT best_JJT system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO discover_VVI if_CSW a_AT1 naturalist_NN1 account_NN1 of_IO dysfunction_NN1 and_CC pathology_NN1 is_VBZ possible_JJ ,_, we_PPIS2 must_VM be_VBI sure_JJ we_PPIS2 have_VH0 settled_VVN on_II the_AT best_JJT naturalist_NN1 account_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB on_II Consent_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 moral_JJ objection_NN1 to_II the_AT content_NN1 of_IO the_AT act_NN1 becomes_VVZ irrelevant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM treat_VVI all_DB the_AT Superman_NP1 stories_NN2 as_II a_AT1 combined_JJ fiction_NN1 ,_, in_II which_DDQ '_NULL Superman_NP1 '_NULL has_VHZ a_AT1 consistent_JJ meaning_NN1 (_( and_CC according_II21 to_II22 which_DDQ Superman_NP1 exists_VVZ and_CC does_VDZ such-and-such_DA )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 if_CS22 this_DD1 is_VBZ true_JJ ,_, however_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 facilitate_VV0 a_AT1 clear_JJ and_CC effective_JJ proof_NN1 system_NN1 for_IF classical_JJ logic_NN1 and_CC other_JJ systems_NN2 ,_, e.g._REX ,_, linear_JJ logic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A._NP1 If_CS pressed_VVN ,_, Kant_NP1 could_VM reply_VVI that_DD1 ,_, as_CSA all_DB fundamental_JJ forces_NN2 are_VBR central_JJ ,_, all_DB shear_VV0 forces_NN2 are_VBR zero_MC everywhere_RL ;_; hence_RR ,_, conjugate_VV0 shears_NN2 are_VBR trivially_RR equal_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Exploitation_NN1 may_VM be_VBI a_AT1 bad_JJ or_CC unfortunate_JJ thing_NN1 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX "_" seriously_RR wrong_JJ ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Inadvertently_RR ,_, Planck_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 work_VV0 on_II the_AT black-body_JJ problem_NN1 had_VHD contributed_VVN to_II a_AT1 revolution_NN1 in_II physics_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Its_APPGE allure_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 challenge_NN1 any_DD political_JJ project_NN1 of_IO the_AT left_NN1 must_VM face_VVI -_- it_PPH1 must_VM also_RR ,_, therefore_RR ,_, begin_VV0 to_TO understand_VVI its_APPGE complex_JJ nature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA references_NN2 often_RR draw_VV0 on_II the_AT West_NP1 African_JJ praise_NN1 singer_NN1 (_( griot_VV0 ,_, gewal_NN1 )_) tradition_NN1 to_TO praise_VVI religious_JJ leaders_NN2 (_( McLaughlin_NP1 1997_MC ,_, 2000_MC )_) ,_, making_VVG them_PPHO2 ever-present_JJ much_RR like_II the_AT ubiquitous_JJ images_NN2 of_IO the_AT same_DA leaders_NN2 that_CST adorn_VV0 homes_NN2 ,_, businesses_NN2 ,_, and_CC automobiles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 configuration_NN1 of_IO values_NN2 represents_VVZ a_AT1 conception_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 vision_NN1 ,_, and_CC an_AT1 ideal_NN1 of_IO the_AT good_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 believes_VVZ that_CST Descartes_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 philosophy_NN1 is_VBZ no_RR21 longer_RR22 the_AT great_JJ driver_NN1 of_IO modern_JJ society_NN1 as_CSA Weber_NP1 believed_VVD ,_, and_CC instead_RR brings_VVZ problems_NN2 to_II humanity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO recapitulate_VVI :_: I_PPIS1 have_VH0 argued_VVN that_CST a_AT1 more_RGR circumspect_JJ version_NN1 of_IO Levinson_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 liberal_JJ intent_JJ option_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 plausible_JJ solution_NN1 to_II the_AT problem_NN1 of_IO justifying_VVG revolutionary_JJ art_NN1 as_CSA artworks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fitness_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 central_JJ concept_NN1 in_II evolutionary_JJ theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG acculturation_NN1 hypothesis_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 expect_VV0 that_CST (_( 5_MC )_) upward_JJ intergenerational_JJ mobility_NN1 will_VM promote_VVI religious_JJ switching_NN1 toward_II Catholicism_NN1 as_II a_AT1 higher_JJR status_NN1 church_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 consistently_RR and_CC inconsistently_RR Protestant_JJ homes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fourth_MD ,_, judges_NN2 should_VM be_VBI rotated_VVN on_II a_AT1 fixed_JJ schedule_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX obvious_JJ how_RRQ to_TO answer_VVI this_DD1 question_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD worry_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST defining_VVG biological_JJ information_NN1 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 a_AT1 procedure_NN1 for_IF collecting_VVG cases_NN2 might_VM appear_VVI to_TO block_VVI any_DD sort_NN1 of_IO theorizing_VVG about_II the_AT phenomenon_NN1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Communitarianism_NP1 :_: the_AT ideology_NN1 that_CST sees_VVZ the_AT world_NN1 as_CSA made_VVN up_RP of_IO communities_NN2 in_II which_DDQ emphasis_NN1 is_VBZ on_II the_AT connection_NN1 between_II the_AT individual_NN1 and_CC the_AT community_NN1 and_CC specifically_RR on_II the_AT interests_NN2 of_IO the_AT community_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ to_TO say_VVI that_DD1 proponent_NN1 and_CC opponent_NN1 exercise_VV0 mutual_JJ control_NN1 over_II how_RRQ the_AT validity_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 conclusion_NN1 is_VBZ established_VVN in_II a_AT1 dialogue_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 Mengzi_NP1 ,_, the_AT most_RGT direct_JJ way_NN1 to_TO step_VVI into_II the_AT Confucian_JJ moral_JJ world_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO consist_VVI in_II making_VVG appropriate_JJ experiences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ought_VMK it_PPH1 not_XX to_TO express_VVI all_DB of_IO those_DD2 things_NN2 for_IF which_DDQ words_NN2 can_VM not_XX be_VBI found_VVN ,_, which_DDQ nevertheless_RR arise_VV0 in_II the_AT heart_NN1 and_CC clamour_VV0 for_IF expression_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
From_II today_RT ,_, I_PPIS1 am_VBM a_AT1 Big_JJ V_ZZ1 and_CC a_AT1 Public_JJ Intellectual_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_II this_DD1 end_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 use_VV0 a_AT1 branching_JJ time_NNT1 structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Garo_NN1 points_VVZ out_RP Althusser_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 resolute_JJ desire_NN1 to_TO think_VVI the_AT contemporary_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II one_MC1 paper_NN1 (_( 1992_MC )_) ,_, he_PPHS1 describes_VVZ what_DDQ he_PPHS1 considers_VVZ to_TO be_VBI non-fallacious_JJ arguments_NN2 from_II ignorance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC I_PPIS1 have_VH0 no_AT magical_JJ powers_NN2 of_IO prevision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, Hensman_NP1 holds_VVZ that_CST anti-globalisation_JJ nationalists_NN2 resist_VV0 the_AT establishment_NN1 of_IO universal_JJ normative_JJ standards_NN2 of_IO workers_NN2 '_NULL rights_NN2 as_RG forcefully_RR as_CSA they_PPHS2 do_VD0 international_JJ capital_NN1 under_II similar_JJ precepts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS there_EX are_VBR systematic_JJ differences_NN2 by_II school_NN1 type_NN1 in_II age_NN1 of_IO stepchildren_NN1 or_CC adopted_VVD children_NN2 ,_, these_DD2 could_VM bias_VVI our_APPGE findings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Abstract_VV0 :_: Philosophers_NN2 often_RR seek_VV0 the_AT truth_NN1 through_II methods_NN2 taught_VVN under_II the_AT banner_NN1 "_" Critical_JJ thinking_NN1 "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
Especially_RR after_II the_AT rise_NN1 of_IO '_NULL neoliberal_JJ populism_NN1 '_NULL in_II the_AT last_MD decades_NNT2 of_IO the_AT twentieth_MD century_NNT1 ,_, the_AT very_JJ indeterminacy_NN1 of_IO populist_JJ antagonisms_NN2 (_( and_CC motivating_VVG contents_NN2 )_) came_VVD to_TO seem_VVI an_AT1 axiomatic_JJ proof_NN1 for_IF the_AT divorce_NN1 between_II any_DD general_JJ definition_NN1 of_IO '_NULL populism_NN1 '_NULL and_CC specifically_RR articulable_JJ class_NN1 structures_NN2 ,_, interests_NN2 ,_, or_CC ideologies_NN2 ,_, and_CC so_RR from_II any_DD specific_JJ relation_NN1 to_II class_NN1 struggle_NN1 in_RR21 general_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS X_ZZ1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
C_NP1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
D_ZZ1 ,_, th_NNU ,_, for_IF any_DD sets_NN2 of_IO players_NN2 A_ZZ1 ,_, C_ZZ1 and_CC D._NP1 And_CC so_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT case_NN1 that_CST evilism4_FO is_VBZ possibly_RR true_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 explains_VVZ that_CST while_CS ZHU_NP1 Xi_NN1 put_VVD forth_RR and_CC emphasized_VVD an_AT1 interpretational_JJ dimension_NN1 of_IO "_" the_AT intent_NN1 of_IO the_AT sages_NN2 and_CC worthies_NN2 ,_, or_CC the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO Heaven_NN1 and_CC earth_NN1 ,_, "_" at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 he_PPHS1 also_RR preserved_VVN an_AT1 understanding_NN1 based_VVN on_II a_AT1 close_JJ reading_NN1 of_IO "_" the_AT text_NN1 and_CC language_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 his_APPGE interpretation_NN1 ,_, the_AT Laozi_NN1 only_RR asserts_VVZ that_CST "_" any_DD prescriptive_JJ discourse-any_DD dao_NN1 that_CST language_NN1 can_VM express-cannot_NN1 be_VBI a_AT1 constantly_RR reliable_JJ guide_NN1 to_II behavior_NN1 "_" (_( Hansen_NP1 1992_MC :_: 229_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ likely_JJ that_CST Olympic-style_JJ sport_NN1 facilitated_VVD this_DD1 unification_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ surprising_JJ ,_, to_TO say_VVI the_AT least_RRT ,_, since_CS Boatright_NP1 (_( 2006_MC )_) might_VM be_VBI suitably_RR described_VVN as_II the_AT most_RGT sophisticated_JJ proponent_NN1 of_IO the_AT shareholder_NN1 primacy_NN1 theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rooney_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 2010_MC )_) argument_NN1 gains_VVZ significant_JJ strength_NN1 when_CS combined_VVN with_IW Haraway_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1988_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II such_DA ,_, both_DB2 perspectives_NN2 supplement_VV0 and_CC reinforce_VV0 the_AT popular_JJ belief_NN1 that_CST has_VHZ made_VVN migration_NN1 more_RRR or_CC less_RRR a_AT1 synonym_NN1 for_IF society_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 most_RGT visible_JJ problems_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Or_CC you_PPY may_VM ask_VVI him_PPHO1 how_RGQ much_DA1 money_NN1 he_PPHS1 asks_VVZ to_TO become_VVI your_APPGE friend-and_CC hopefully_RR he_PPHS1 is_VBZ honest_JJ enough_RR to_TO laugh_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, I_PPIS1 feel_VV0 like_II there_RL is_VBZ a_AT1 higher_JJR value_NN1 on_II human_JJ life_NN1 than_CSN there_EX is_VBZ on_II the_AT planet_NN1 ..._... once_RR21 again_RR22 ,_, you_PPY get_VV0 those_DD2 extremes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sure_JJ enough_RR ,_, speakers_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO read_VVI only_JJ (_( 1_MC1 )_) -(5)_MC analogically_RR ,_, but_CCB that_DD1 fact_NN1 has_VHZ no_AT obvious_JJ bearing_NN1 on_II the_AT truth_NN1 of_IO RPM_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, in_II §1_FO ,_, I_PPIS1 provide_VV0 a_AT1 more_RGR detailed_JJ description_NN1 of_IO na_FW ?_? ve_NN1 realism_NN1 and_CC the_AT content_JJ view_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, note_VV0 that_CST Gramsci_NP1 specifies_VVZ the_AT dangers_NN2 of_IO relying_VVG on_II traditional_JJ philosophies_NN2 and_CC religions_NN2 ;_; but_CCB leaves_VVZ open_JJ ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ ,_, the_AT prospect_NN1 of_IO principled_JJ socialist_JJ engagements_NN2 with_IW non-traditional_JJ and_CC emergent_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO thought_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Theists_NN2 must_VM accept_VVI the_AT second_MD premise_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 argument_NN1 ,_, and_CC aim_VV0 their_APPGE objections_NN2 at_II the_AT first_MD ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT above_JJ quote_NN1 illustrates_VVZ what_DDQ Alves_NP1 (_( 2009_MC )_) calls_VVZ the_AT immigrant_JJ regime_NN1 of_IO production_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 situation_NN1 in_II which_DDQ immigrants_NN2 '_NULL labor_VV0 ,_, while_CS beneficial_JJ in_II some_DD ways_NN2 ,_, is_VBZ also_RR exploitative_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, Tooze_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 efforts_NN2 to_TO bring_VVI the_AT discipline_NN1 of_IO Holocaust_NP1 Studies_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ increasingly_RR turning_VVG its_APPGE back_NN1 on_II the_AT political_JJ and_CC economic_JJ contexts_NN2 of_IO its_APPGE subject_NN1 matter_NN1 ,_, back_RP into_II the_AT historiography_NN1 of_IO German_JJ fascism_NN1 seems_VVZ to_II me_PPIO1 to_TO be_VBI of_IO special_JJ importance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consider_VV0 first_MD the_AT gap_NN1 between_II (_( 2_MC )_) and_CC (_( 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ implied_VVN that_CST members_NN2 of_IO the_AT linguistic_JJ community_NN1 in_II times_NNT2 past_II first_MD put_VVD the_AT term_NN1 "_" exist_VV0 "_" (_( you_PPY )_) before_II "_" fate_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT high_JJ concentration_NN1 of_IO technology_NN1 in_II videos_NN2 is_VBZ partly_RR due_II21 to_II22 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST half_DB of_IO all_DB jihadi_JJ films_NN2 document_VV0 battles_NN2 and_CC attacks_NN2 (_( Finsnes_NN2 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST the_AT two_MC new_JJ connectives_NN2 Ci_FO and_CC Ri_NP1 j_ZZ1 are_VBR nullary_JJ (_( they_PPHS2 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 take_VV0 any_DD arguments_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS the_AT car_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE dominant_JJ presence_NN1 may_VM be_VBI seen_VVN as_CSA capturing_VVG global_JJ structures_NN2 of_IO oppression_NN1 ,_, the_AT overt_JJ focus_NN1 is_VBZ on_II Lotte_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 attempt_VV0 as_II an_AT1 individual_JJ to_TO "_" save_VVI "_" another_DD1 individual_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 take_VV0 it_PPH1 that_CST an_AT1 intuition_NN1 like_II that_DD1 underlies_VVZ the_AT works_NN of_IO many_DA2 contrastivists_NN2 ;_; the_AT intuition_NN1 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, that_CST a_AT1 full_JJ ,_, non-contrastive_JJ explanation_NN1 is_VBZ never_RR given_VVN ,_, but_CCB can_VM only_RR be_VBI understood_VVN as_II the_AT ideal_JJ limit_NN1 of_IO including_VVG more_RRR and_CC more_DAR contrasts_NN2 in_II a_AT1 single_JJ explanation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Attendees_NN2 completed_VVD the_AT VL_NP1 scale_NN1 as_II part_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE workshop_NN1 ,_, with_IW these_DD2 sessions_NNT2 held_VVN over_II the_AT past_JJ few_DA2 years_NNT2 (_( P._NP1 Bombard_NP1 ,_, personal_JJ information_NN1 ,_, February_NPM1 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR there_EX is_VBZ nothing_PN1 that_CST these_DD2 two_MC have_VH0 in_RR21 common_RR22 ,_, but_CCB why_RRQ would_VM we_PPIS2 say_VVI that_CST they_PPHS2 are_VBR opposites_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Contrary_II21 to_II22 the_AT mainstream_JJ view_NN1 that_CST money_NN1 emerged_VVD out_II21 of_II22 the_AT growth_NN1 of_IO trade_NN1 networks_NN2 and_CC market_VV0 exchange_NN1 ,_, war_NN1 may_VM well_RR have_VHI been_VBN more_RGR significant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ widespread_JJ recognition_NN1 that_CST the_AT problem_NN1 of_IO supplying_VVG clean_JJ water_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 technical_JJ problem_NN1 -_- it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 question_NN1 of_IO lack_NN1 of_IO technical_JJ expertise_NN1 in_II supplying_VVG pumps_NN2 ,_, sanitation_NN1 equipment_NN1 ,_, dams_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT like_JJ ,_, or_CC indeed_RR ,_, sometimes_RT ,_, even_RR a_AT1 lack_NN1 of_IO natural_JJ supply_NN1 of_IO clean_JJ water_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Suppose_VV0 that_CST Diana_NP1 proceeds_VVZ as_CSA in_II the_AT above_JJ scenario_NN1 ,_, thereby_RR in_II fact_NN1 determining_VVG that_CST in_II 30_MC years_NNT2 Ernie_NP1 shall_VM lie_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT basic_JJ intuitions_NN2 about_II explanation_NN1 of_IO both_RR contrastivists_NN2 and_CC non-contrastivists_NN2 can_VM thus_RR be_VBI accomodated_VVN in_II a_AT1 single_JJ theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 are_VBR consistent_JJ with_IW our_APPGE hypothesis_NN1 (_( 5_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ states_VVZ that_CST Evangelical_JJ identification_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX only_RR affected_VVN by_II the_AT individual_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 educational_JJ status_NN1 achievement_NN1 ,_, but_CCB also_RR by_II the_AT educational_JJ gap_NN1 that_CST emerges_VVZ between_II generations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CS31 far_CS32 as_CS33 identifying_VVG cultural_JJ patterns_NN2 is_VBZ concerned_JJ ,_, comparative_JJ philosophers_NN2 need_VM not_XX only_RR to_TO work_VVI within_II their_APPGE own_DA disciplinary_JJ boundaries_NN2 but_CCB also_RR to_TO work_VVI in_II concert_NN1 with_IW (_( social_JJ )_) scientists_NN2 ,_, in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO make_VVI our_APPGE own_DA work_NN1 on_II cultural_JJ patterns_NN2 fruitful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS this_DD1 transition_NN1 from_II unfree_JJ to_TO free_VVI to_II surplus_JJ labour_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX strictly_RR speaking_VVG a_AT1 question_NN1 of_IO the_AT economic_JJ need_NN1 for_IF land_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 had_VHD everything_PN1 to_TO do_VDI with_IW the_AT reconfiguration_NN1 of_IO space_NN1 :_: from_II the_AT Black_JJ codes_NN2 as_II a_AT1 limitation_NN1 of_IO mobility_NN1 ,_, to_II the_AT push-and-pull_JJ of_IO the_AT reconquest_JJT of_IO inner-cities_NN2 by_II gentrification_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT new_JJ form_NN1 of_IO containing_VVG '_NULL dangerous_JJ '_NULL populations_NN2 in_II prisons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Some_DD particles_NN2 are_VBR members_NN2 of_IO world_NN1 1_MC1 ,_, some_DD of_IO world_NN1 2_MC ,_, and_RR31 so_RR32 on_RR33 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS there_EX still_RR is_VBZ a_AT1 difference_NN1 of_IO opinion_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM have_VHI to_TO be_VBI that_CST the_AT non-contrastivist_NN1 believes_VVZ that_CST we_PPIS2 should_VM reserve_VVI the_AT term_NN1 '_NULL explanation_NN1 '_NULL for_IF full_JJ ,_, non-contrastive_JJ explanations_NN2 ,_, and_CC think_VV0 of_IO partial_JJ ,_, contrastive_JJ explanations_NN2 as_CSA in_II some_DD sense_NN1 derivative_NN1 ;_; while_CS the_AT contrastivist_NN1 holds_VVZ the_AT opposite_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 sides_NN2 agreed_VVD to_TO ask_VVI the_AT World_NN1 Congress_NN1 to_TO mediate_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB they_PPHS2 are_VBR more_RRR related_VVN to_II how_RRQ the_AT FDA_NN1 regulates_VVZ things_NN2 ,_, now_CS21 that_CS22 I_PPIS1 am_VBM working_VVG in_II applied_JJ and_CC not_XX basic_JJ science_NN1 ._. 
</s>
