﻿<s>
As_CSA outlined_VVN here_RL ,_, the_AT programming_NN1 process_NN1 is_VBZ ongoing_JJ and_CC critical_JJ to_II ensuring_VVG that_DD1 sound_NN1 information_NN1 is_VBZ being_VBG conveyed_VVN accurately_RR to_II the_AT auditory_JJ nerve_NN1 and_CC ,_, ultimately_RR ,_, to_II the_AT auditory_JJ cortex_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 did_VDD report_VVI a_AT1 range_NN1 of_IO emotions_NN2 ;_; thus_RR ,_, the_AT task_NN1 seemed_VVD to_TO invite_VVI variability_NN1 in_II responses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT dominant_JJ view_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST all_DB items_NN2 in_II working_VVG memory_NN1 share_VV0 a_AT1 single_JJ resource_NN1 ,_, and_CC that_CST we_PPIS2 can_VM prioritize_VVI one_MC1 item_NN1 by_II redistributing_VVG resources_NN2 in_II its_APPGE favor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Releasing_VVG the_AT constraint_NN1 on_II intercept_VV0 invariance_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 item_NN1 (_( model_NN1 4_MC ;_; motivation_NN1 to_TO change_VVI )_) resulted_VVD in_II a_AT1 model_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ not_XX significantly_RR different_JJ from_II model_NN1 2_MC ,_, and_CC was_VBDZ an_AT1 adequate_JJ fit_NN1 to_II the_AT data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Mplus_NN1 software_NN1 program_NN1 (_( Muthén_NP1 &;_NULL Muthén_NP1 ,_, 1998–2010_MCMC )_) is_VBZ adopted_VVN to_TO perform_VVI the_AT DIF_NP1 test_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 from_II both_DB2 studies_NN2 also_RR suggest_VV0 that_CST OVC_NP1 was_VBDZ linked_VVN to_II job_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 both_RR directly_RR and_CC indirectly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT showup_NN1 conditions_NN2 used_VVD a_AT1 single_JJ photograph_NN1 of_IO the_AT perpetrator_NN1 or_CC innocent_JJ suspect_NN1 for_IF target_NN1 present_NN1 and_CC target_VV0 absent_JJ conditions_NN2 ,_, respectively_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Accordingly_RR ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ important_JJ to_TO assess_VVI whether_CSW our_APPGE manipulations_NN2 affected_VVN scenario_NN1 withdrawal_NN1 stage_NN1 ,_, and_CC hence_RR ,_, the_AT amount_NN1 of_IO scenario_NN1 information_NN1 to_II which_DDQ women_NN2 were_VBDR exposed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, the_AT main_JJ objective_NN1 of_IO the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO contribute_VVI to_II the_AT understanding_NN1 of_IO aesthetic_JJ appreciation_NN1 abilities_NN2 in_II amusia_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT properties_NN2 of_IO disgust_NN1 make_VV0 it_PPH1 very_RG relevant_JJ to_II prejudicial_JJ attitudes_NN2 ,_, varying_VVG through_II both_DB2 contextual_JJ factors_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, disease_NN1 prevalence_NN1 )_) and_CC individual_JJ differences_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, perceived_VVD vulnerability_NN1 to_II disease_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT majority_NN1 of_IO IAPT_NP1 trainees_NN2 go_VV0 on_RP to_TO work_VVI in_II IAPT_NP1 services_NN2 and_CC stay_VVI there_RL -_- a_AT1 key_JJ finding_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT birthdate_NN1 method_NN1 identified_VVN accelerated_JJ students_NN2 (_( labeled_JJ "_" birthdate_NN1 accelerants_NN2 "_" )_) in_II all_DB five_MC federal_JJ datasets_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 then_RT used_VVD logistic_JJ regression_NN1 to_TO test_VVI the_AT relationships_NN2 of_IO the_AT control_NN1 variables_NN2 ,_, job_NN1 demands_NN2 ,_, job_NN1 control_NN1 ,_, and_CC their_APPGE interaction_NN1 with_IW mortality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT treatment_NN1 (_( i.e._REX the_AT participation_NN1 to_II the_AT program_NN1 )_) was_VBDZ randomly_RR assigned_VVN to_II inmates_NN2 that_CST signaled_VVD their_APPGE interest_NN1 and_CC passed_VVD the_AT interview_NN1 ,_, up_II21 to_II22 the_AT filling_NN1 of_IO all_DB available_JJ places_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 ask_VV0 our_APPGE research_NN1 questions_NN2 as_CSA follows_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Crucially_RR ,_, lists_NN2 were_VBDR presented_VVN in_II groups_NN2 of_IO threes_MC2 on_II only_RR a_AT1 randomly_RR distributed_VVN 20%_NNU of_IO trials_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specify_VV0 how_RRQ this_DD1 evidence_NN1 will_VM be_VBI accumulated_VVN across_II items_NN2 to_TO make_VVI inferences_NN2 intended_VVN for_IF feedback_NN1 and_CC reporting_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 with_IW aggregation_NN1 through_II measurement_NN1 models_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Satisfaction_NN1 with_IW Life_NN1 Scale_NN1 (_( Diener_NP1 ,_, Emmons_NP1 ,_, Larsen_NP1 ,_, Griffin_NP1 ,_, 1985_MC )_) measures_VVZ life_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 as_II a_AT1 cognitive_JJ judgment_NN1 process_NN1 through_II five_MC items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Multilevel_VV0 modeling_NN1 was_VBDZ chosen_VVN to_TO analyze_VVI the_AT data_NN for_IF several_DA2 reasons_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Heck_NN1 ,_, Thomas_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Tabata_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II implication_NN1 ,_, training_VVG that_CST primarily_RR focuses_VVZ on_II less_RGR complex_JJ aspects_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, external_JJ aspects_NN2 )_) of_IO emotion_NN1 can_VM also_RR impact_NN1 more_RGR advanced_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO understanding_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, reflective_JJ aspects_NN2 )_) and_CC vice_RR21 versa_RR22 -_- although_CS for_IF training_NN1 of_IO the_AT external_JJ aspect_NN1 of_IO emotion_NN1 it_PPH1 might_VM be_VBI more_RGR effective_JJ to_TO just_RR focus_VVI on_II external_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO emotion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Disclosures_NN2 of_IO childhood_NN1 physical_JJ or_CC sexual_JJ abuse_NN1 during_II the_AT AAI_NP1 were_VBDR not_XX included_VVN in_II the_AT present_JJ set_NN1 of_IO codes_NN2 except_CS in_II situations_NN2 in_II which_DDQ an_AT1 experience_NN1 of_IO abuse_NN1 was_VBDZ initially_RR identified_VVN based_VVN on_II records_NN2 through_II age_NN1 17.5_MC years_NNT2 ,_, but_CCB there_EX was_VBDZ insufficient_JJ detail_NN1 to_TO code_VVI the_AT specific_JJ developmental_JJ period_NN1 or_CC perpetrator_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, an_AT1 adolescent_NN1 disclosed_VVN a_AT1 history_NN1 of_IO sexual_JJ assault_NN1 without_IW specifying_VVG whether_CSW the_AT perpetrator_NN1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 peer_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, accuracy_NN1 of_IO team_NN1 mental_JJ models_NN2 is_VBZ also_RR an_AT1 important_JJ feature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, US_NP1 citizens_NN2 donated_VVD 25%_NNU less_DAR to_II victims_NN2 of_IO the_AT 2004_MC tsunami_NN2 in_II South-East_ND1 Asia_NP1 than_CSN to_II those_DD2 affected_VVN by_II hurricane_NN1 Katrina_NP1 ,_, which_DDQ killed_VVD about_RG 1,600_MC people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 assessed_VVD 2_MC forms_NN2 of_IO agreement_NN1 between_II mothers_NN2 '_NULL and_CC fathers_NN2 '_NULL socially_RR desirable_JJ responding_VVG in_II China_NP1 ,_, Colombia_NP1 ,_, Italy_NP1 ,_, Jordan_NP1 ,_, Kenya_NP1 ,_, the_AT Philippines_NP2 ,_, Sweden_NP1 ,_, Thailand_NP1 and_CC the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 1110_MC families_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
You_PPY will_VM be_VBI matched_VVN with_IW another_DD1 participant_NN1 who_PNQS receives_VVZ the_AT amount_NN1 you_PPY chose_VVD to_TO give_VVI to_II the_AT '_NULL other_JJ '_NULL in_II the_AT selected_JJ question_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT three_MC stressors_NN2 were_VBDR selected_VVN on_II the_AT basis_NN1 that_CST each_DD1 has_VHZ been_VBN associated_VVN with_IW depression_NN1 in_II prior_JJ research_NN1 but_CCB comparisons_NN2 between_II these_DD2 different_JJ types_NN2 of_IO stressors_NN2 have_VH0 not_XX been_VBN systematically_RR investigated_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 interactions_NN2 with_IW gender_NN1 or_CC pubertal_JJ development_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT early_JJ clomipramine_NN1 studies_NN2 ,_, symptoms_NN2 re-emerged_VVD within_II a_AT1 few_DA2 weeks_NNT2 of_IO stopping_VVG medication_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS improvement_NN1 to_II a_AT1 level_NN1 near_II21 to_II22 that_DD1 prior_II21 to_II22 discontinuation_NN1 was_VBDZ achieved_VVN by_II reinstatement_NN1 of_IO clomipramine_NN1 (_( reviewed_VVN in_II Fineberg_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2007c_FO )_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reliability_NN1 of_IO the_AT diagnosis_NN1 in_II question_NN1 ,_, 5_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Papers_NN2 discussing_VVG trade_NN1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 obesity_NN1 ,_, nutritional_JJ intake_NN1 or_CC health_NN1 behaviours_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR excluded_VVN as_CSA this_DD1 area_NN1 was_VBDZ covered_VVN by_II the_AT previous_JJ review_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 wide_JJ range_NN1 of_IO studies_NN2 included_VVN in_II the_AT analyses_NN2 with_IW no_AT major_JJ limitations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Women_NN2 did_VDD exhibit_VVI some_DD reluctance_NN1 to_TO acknowledge_VVI actively_RR participating_VVG in_II informational_JJ warfare_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF a_AT1 comprehensive_JJ review_NN1 of_IO both_DB2 the_AT advantages_NN2 and_CC the_AT pitfalls_NN2 of_IO NHST_NP1 in_II psychological_JJ science_NN1 ,_, see_VV0 Nickerson_NP1 (_( 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 approach_NN1 formed_VVD the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO the_AT explicit_JJ instruction_NN1 condition_NN1 practiced_VVD in_II the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT measure_NN1 therefore_RR is_VBZ useful_JJ for_IF comparing_VVG mothers_NN2 '_NULL and_CC fathers_NN2 '_NULL positive_JJ parenting_NN1 in_II play_NN1 but_CCB does_VDZ not_XX point_VVI to_II unique_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO interaction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Across_II both_DB2 samples_NN2 ,_, women_NN2 had_VHD lower_JJR employment_NN1 ranks_NN2 than_CSN men_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ mirrors_NN2 contemporary_JJ surveys_NN2 (_( e.g._REX World_NN1 Economic_JJ Forum_NN1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) and_CC which_DDQ has_VHZ been_VBN attributed_VVN to_II women_NN2 generally_RR having_VHG lower_JJR power_NN1 desires_NN2 than_CSN men_NN2 (_( e.g._REX Gino_NP1 ,_, Wilmuth_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Brooks_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Schuh_NP1 ,_, Hernandez_NP1 ,_, Frieg_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Van_NP1 Dick_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO rely_VVI on_II their_APPGE own_DA memories_NN2 ,_, the_AT subjects_NN2 must_VM be_VBI able_JK to_TO distinguish_VVI between_II their_APPGE own_DA memories_NN2 and_CC information_NN1 stemming_VVG from_II other_JJ sources_NN2 There_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 vast_JJ amount_NN1 of_IO research_NN1 suggesting_VVG that_CST the_AT subjects_NN2 participating_VVG in_II experiments_NN2 on_II the_AT misinformation_NN1 effect_NN1 differ_VV0 in_II their_APPGE ability_NN1 to_TO tell_VVI whether_CSW a_AT1 particular_JJ detail_NN1 was_VBDZ included_VVN in_II the_AT original_JJ or_CC post-event_JJ material_NN1 (_( or_CC both_RR ,_, or_CC neither_RR )_) (_( e.g._REX Johnson_NP1 ,_, Hashtroudi_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lindsay_NP1 ,_, 1993_MC ;_; Lindsay_NP1 ,_, 1990_MC ;_; Lindsay_NP1 &;_NULL Johnson_NP1 ,_, 1989_MC ;_; Mitchell_NP1 &;_NULL Johnson_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC ;_; Zaragoza_NP1 &;_NULL Lane_NNL1 ,_, 1994_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Twentyone_VV0 participants_NN2 (_( 48%_NNU )_) transitioned_VVD to_II a_AT1 mainstream_JJ educational_JJ setting_NN1 with_IW no_AT support_NN1 (_( eight_MC into_II 4yearold_FO kindergarten_NN1 and_CC 13_MC into_II school_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA an_AT1 effect_NN1 was_VBDZ taken_VVN to_TO support_VVI the_AT culprit_NN1 hypothesis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Universal_JJ models_NN2 on_II reading_VVG development_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 orthographic_JJ depth_NN1 hypothesis_NN1 (_( Katz_NP1 &;_NULL Frost_NP1 ,_, 1992_MC )_) ,_, have_VH0 paid_VVN special_JJ attention_NN1 to_II the_AT influence_NN1 of_IO the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO orthographies_NN2 on_II literacy_NN1 development_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX report_VVI significance_NN1 because_CS the_AT correlation_NN1 table_NN1 includes_VVZ different_JJ level_JJ variables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS data_NN was_VBDZ tracked_VVN across_II multiple_JJ days_NNT2 of_IO practice_NN1 for_IF each_DD1 participant_NN1 ,_, the_AT data_NN was_VBDZ hierarchically_RR structured_VVN with_IW time_NNT1 (_( day_NNT1 1_MC1 ,_, day_NNT1 2_MC ,_, day_NNT1 3_MC )_) as_II a_AT1 within-person_JJ level_NN1 1_MC1 variable_NN1 and_CC participant_NN1 as_II a_AT1 level_NN1 2_MC variable_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, the_AT purpose_NN1 of_IO the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO examine_VVI a_AT1 possible_JJ overlap_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 differences_NN2 in_II psychological_JJ and_CC somatic_JJ symptoms_NN2 between_II individuals_NN2 with_IW IEI_NP1 ,_, major_JJ depression_NN1 and_CC schizophrenia_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ to_II previous_JJ studies_NN2 (_( see_VV0 aforementioned_JJ discussion_NN1 )_) ,_, normative_JJ values_NN2 were_VBDR obtained_VVN by_II regressing_VVG PEF_NN1 on_II age_NN1 ,_, sex_NN1 (_( 1_MC1 =_FO male_NN1 and_CC 0_MC =_FO female_NN1 )_) ,_, height_NN1 and_CC race_NN1 (_( 1_MC1 =_FO Caucasian_NN1 and_CC 0_MC =_FO other_JJ )_) in_II a_AT1 subsample_NN1 of_IO participants_NN2 with_IW no_AT history_NN1 of_IO smoking_NN1 ,_, chronic_JJ lung_NN1 disease_NN1 and_CC who_PNQS indicated_VVD to_TO never_RR experience_VVI breathing_VVG problems_NN2 (_( shortness_NN1 of_IO breath_NN1 )_) (_( the_AT equations_NN2 used_VMK to_TO compute_VVI the_AT predicted_JJ values_NN2 are_VBR given_VVN in_II the_AT Supporting_JJ Information_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO find_VVI consensus_NN1 about_II the_AT ethically_RR justified_JJ limits_NN2 of_IO sexual_JJ facilitation_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 would_VM need_VVI more_RGR research-based_JJ practical_JJ examples_NN2 of_IO such_DA assistance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II human_JJ experiments_NN2 like_II those_DD2 of_IO the_AT present_JJ investigation_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, money-gains_NN2 and_CC money-loss_JJ cancellations_NN2 differ_VV0 but_CCB literally_RR are_VBR rendered_VVN in_II a_AT1 common_JJ currency_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, GBA_NP1 was_VBDZ significantly_RR lower_JJR in_II the_AT high_JJ versus_II low_JJ mortality_NN1 salience_NN1 condition_NN1 when_RRQ participants_NN2 reflected_VVN on_II the_AT experience_NN1 ,_, t(95)_FO =_FO 2.23_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO 0.03_MC ,_, d_ZZ1 =_FO 0.45_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Despite_II the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST ethanol_NN1 exposure_NN1 was_VBDZ restricted_VVN to_II 4_MC days_NNT2 per_II week_NNT1 in_II this_DD1 study_NN1 ,_, the_AT duration_NN1 of_IO exposure_NN1 is_VBZ still_RR considerably_RR longer_JJR in_II real_JJ time_NNT1 than_CSN would_VM ever_RR be_VBI the_AT case_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 rodent_NN1 (_( Clancy_NP1 ,_, Darlington_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Finlay_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT videos_NN2 varied_VVN in_II the_AT consistency_NN1 between_II the_AT two_MC alibi_NN1 statements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, consumers_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR exposed_VVN to_TO "_" Save_VV0 up_II21 to_II22 Y%_FO "_" with_IW an_AT1 implausibly_RR high_JJ maximum_JJ anchor_NN1 (_( Y_ZZ1 )_) ,_, will_VM adjust_VVI their_APPGE EPD_NN1 toward_II Y_ZZ1 or_CC the_AT highest_JJT plausible_JJ level_NN1 of_IO price_NN1 discount_NN1 according_II21 to_II22 their_APPGE standards_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recorded_JJ data_NN were_VBDR processed_VVN offline_RR with_IW EEGlab_NP1 (_( Delorme_NP1 and_CC Makeig_NP1 ,_, 2004_MC )_) and_CC ERPlab_NP1 (_( Lopez-Calderon_NP1 and_CC Luck_NN1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) MATLAB_VV0 toolboxes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, participants_NN2 described_VVN being_VBG compelled_VVN by_II a_AT1 sense_NN1 that_CST they_PPHS2 deserved_VVD their_APPGE punishment_NN1 ,_, e.g._REX '_NULL It_PPH1 was_VBDZ an_AT1 appropriate_JJ punishment_NN1 '_NULL (_( P17_FO :_: 18_MC ,_, male_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Clearly_RR ,_, the_AT general_JJ model_NN1 becomes_VVZ increasingly_RR complicated_VVN due_II21 to_II22 the_AT extra_JJ factor_NN1 loading_NN1 parameters_NN2 introduced_VVN for_IF the_AT interaction_NN1 factors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II WM_NP1 load_NN1 2_MC to_II WM_NP1 load_NN1 3_MC ,_, and_CC with_IW the_AT increase_NN1 in_II the_AT amount_NN1 of_IO irrelevant_JJ information_NN1 ,_, the_AT inhibition_NN1 function_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO require_VVI more_DAR resources_NN2 (_( as_CSA suggested_VVN by_II the_AT main_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO WM_NP1 load_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ this_DD1 multilevel_NN1 structure_NN1 which_DDQ makes_VVZ recruitment_NN1 "_" strategic_JJ "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
Surprisingly_RR ,_, in_II this_DD1 youngest_JJT group_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX even_RR observe_VVI any_DD clear_JJ bias_NN1 to_II the_AT right_JJ side_NN1 along_II the_AT horizontal_JJ linethat_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, toward_II the_AT side_NN1 ipsilateral_NN1 to_II the_AT hand_NN1 usedwhich_NN1 could_VM be_VBI expected_VVN based_VVN on_II other_JJ developmental_JJ studies_NN2 reporting_VVG such_DA tendencies_NN2 in_II preschoolers_NN2 (_( cf._VV0 High-density_JJ representations_NN2 for_IF short_JJ events_NN2 were_VBDR reconstructed_VVN as_CSA highly_RR eventful_JJ ,_, leading_VVG to_II longer_JJR reproductions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, research_NN1 examining_VVG the_AT use_NN1 of_IO electronic_JJ performance_NN1 monitoring_NN1 (_( EPM_NP1 )_) practices_NN2 in_II virtual_JJ team_NN1 would_VM appear_VVI to_TO have_VHI a_AT1 high_JJ potential_NN1 for_IF contributing_VVG valuable_JJ insights_NN2 regarding_II the_AT impact_NN1 of_IO legal_JJ considerations_NN2 on_II virtual_JJ teams_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 might_VM be_VBI especially_RR important_JJ in_II this_DD1 group_NN1 of_IO emerging_JJ adults_NN2 as_CSA successfully_RR entering_VVG the_AT context_NN1 of_IO work_NN1 can_VM be_VBI seen_VVN as_II the_AT most_RGT major_JJ developmental_JJ transition_NN1 these_DD2 emerging_JJ adults_NN2 are_VBR facing_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 positive_JJ effect_NN1 was_VBDZ expected_VVN (_( more_DAR errors_NN2 for_IF shooting_VVG unarmed_JJ Black_NN1 versus_II White_JJ targets_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, determining_VVG whether_CSW the_AT disturbances_NN2 in_II NO_AT levels_NN2 are_VBR the_AT cause_NN1 or_CC consequence_NN1 of_IO schizophrenia_NN1 requires_VVZ further_JJR investigation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA baseline_NN1 values_NN2 differ_VV0 between_II participants_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 need_VV0 to_TO be_VBI controlled_VVN for_IF ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 devised_VVD a_AT1 novel_JJ method_NN1 to_TO do_VDI this_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 experimental_JJ condition_NN1 was_VBDZ terminated_VVN when_CS the_AT following_JJ criteria_NN2 were_VBDR met_VVN :_: (_( a_ZZ1 )_) visual_JJ analysis_NN1 of_IO graphed_JJ response-allocation_JJ proportions_NN2 suggested_VVD no_AT systematic_JJ trend_NN1 in_II the_AT data_NN ,_, and_CC (_( b_ZZ1 )_) for_IF both_RR response-allocation_JJ and_CC time-allocation_JJ proportions_NN2 ,_, over_RG four_MC consecutive_JJ sessions_NNT2 ,_, the_AT difference_NN1 in_II means_NN between_II the_AT first_MD and_CC second_MD pair_NN of_IO sessions_NNT2 differed_VVN by_II no_AT more_DAR than_CSN 10%_NNU of_IO the_AT four-session_JJ mean_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT first_MD order_NN1 ,_, subjects_NN2 made_VVD decisions_NN2 for_IF the_AT vignettes_NN2 first_MD and_CC then_RT in_II the_AT public_JJ goods_NN2 games_NN2 ;_; the_AT second_MD order_NN1 was_VBDZ like_II our_APPGE Study_NN1 2_MC where_RRQ subjects_NN2 made_VVD choices_NN2 for_IF the_AT public_JJ goods_NN2 game_NN1 first_MD and_CC then_RT for_IF the_AT vignettes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reparative_JJ dialogue_NN1 between_II the_AT victim_NN1 and_CC the_AT offender_NN1 ,_, especially_RR involving_VVG juvenile_JJ offenders_NN2 ,_, has_VHZ received_VVN considerable_JJ attention_NN1 (_( Bergseth_NP1 and_CC Bouffard_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Rodriguez_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Sherman_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT last_MD two_MC are_VBR also_RR general_JJ competencies_NN2 in_II the_AT curriculum_NN1 for_IF all_DB subjects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR several_DA2 empirical_JJ lines_NN2 of_IO evidence_NN1 that_CST converge_VV0 on_II this_DD1 conclusion_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Ziegler_NP1 &;_NULL Gos-wami_NN2 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ,_, and_CC the_AT present_JJ individual_JJ differences_NN2 findings_NN2 potentially_RR help_VV0 inform_VVI the_AT issue_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ it_PPH1 means_VVZ to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 good_JJ reader_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT N2_FO ,_, or_CC N200_FO ,_, is_VBZ an_AT1 event-related_JJ potential_NN1 (_( ERP_NP1 )_) that_CST can_VM be_VBI seen_VVN as_II a_AT1 negative_JJ wave_NN1 peaking_VVG 200–350_MCMC ms_NN1 after_II a_AT1 visual_JJ or_CC auditory_JJ stimulus_NN1 using_VVG electroencephalography_NN1 (_( EEG_NP1 )_) (_( Folstein_NP1 &;_NULL Van_NP1 Petten_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 research_NN1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN in_RR21 part_RR22 by_II a_AT1 grant_NN1 from_II the_AT Austrian_JJ Science_NN1 Foundation_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, Erwin-Schr?dinger_NP1 Fellowship_NN1 Abroad_RL to_II Manuel_NP1 Sprung_VVD ,_, Project_NN1 number_NN1 :_: J2853-G16_JJ )_) and_CC NIH_NP1 grant_NN1 R01AT007257_FO and_CC R34MH099311_FO to_II Stefan_NP1 G._NP1 Hofmann_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 are_VBR consistent_JJ with_IW our_APPGE expectation_NN1 that_CST the_AT number_NN1 of_IO dateable_JJ life_NN1 events_NN2 would_VM increase_VVI from_II childhood_NN1 to_II adolescence_NN1 to_II adulthood_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 block_NN1 participants_NN2 could_VM take_VVI a_AT1 break_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT start_NN1 of_IO the_AT successive_JJ block_NN1 was_VBDZ self-paced_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA innovations_NN2 remain_VV0 largely_RR untested_JJ but_CCB may_VM provide_VVI a_AT1 window_NN1 to_II the_AT near_JJ future_NN1 of_IO technological_JJ applications_NN2 to_II health_NN1 and_CC mental_JJ health_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD game_NN1 the_AT participants_NN2 played_VVD was_VBDZ Dora_NP1 the_AT Explorer_NN1 :_: Number_NN1 Groups_NN2 Matching_VVG played_VVN at_II level_NN1 2_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Adherence_NN1 to_II normativity_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN raised_VVN in_II work_NN1 on_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 overimitation_NN1 (_( Kenward_NP1 ,_, Karlsson_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Persson_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Keupp_NP1 ,_, Behne_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Rakoczy_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO investigate_VVI this_DD1 idea_NN1 further_RRR ,_, I_PPIS1 ran_VVD the_AT same_DA experiments_NN2 in_II two_MC different_JJ second-semester_JJ classes_NN2 while_CS I_PPIS1 conducted_VVD experiments_NN2 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC in_II first-semester_JJ classes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 has_VHZ also_RR been_VBN suggested_VVN that_CST the_AT use_NN1 of_IO virtual_JJ teams_NN2 permits_VVZ ,_, if_CS not_XX promotes_VVZ ,_, the_AT active_JJ participation_NN1 of_IO more_RGR diverse_JJ groups_NN2 of_IO employees_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, here_RL we_PPIS2 assessed_VVD elaborativeness_NN1 and_CC parental_JJ questioning_NN1 about_II the_AT toy_NN1 play_NN1 event_NN1 in_II separate_JJ conversations_NN2 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO examine_VVI elaborativeness_NN1 in_II reminiscing_VVG conversations_NN2 as_CSA they_PPHS2 are_VBR typically_RR assessed_VVN and_CC compare_VV0 this_DD1 with_IW a_AT1 separate_JJ ,_, and_CC arguably_RR quite_RG different_JJ questioning_JJ context-_NN1 that_CST regarding_II an_AT1 unshared_JJ potential_JJ transgression_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 conclude_VV0 that_CST figurative_JJ language_NN1 is_VBZ often_RR ambiguous_JJ and_CC should_VM be_VBI used_VVN with_IW caution_NN1 on_II psychological_JJ tests_NN2 unless_CS there_EX is_VBZ evidence_NN1 the_AT language_NN1 is_VBZ understood_VVN cross-culturally_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT accuracy_NN1 data_NN showed_VVD similar_JJ performance_NN1 in_II training_NN1 session1_FO and_CC 2_MC (_( F_ZZ1 <_FO 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, traitlike_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, the_AT Big_JJ Five_MC personality_NN1 traits_NN2 )_) variables_NN2 are_VBR often_RR assumed_VVN to_TO be_VBI biologically_RR based_VVN ,_, stable_JJ ,_, and_CC not_XX amenable_JJ to_TO change_VVI (_( Eysenck_NP1 ,_, 1970_MC ;_; McCrae_NP1 &;_NULL Costa_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ well_RR known_VVN that_CST the_AT prosody_NN1 of_IO IDS_NN2 is_VBZ exaggerated_VVN in_II31 comparison_II32 with_II33 ADS_NN2 ,_, but_CCB high_RR vocal_JJ prosodic_JJ values_NN2 could_VM be_VBI associated_VVN not_XX only_RR with_IW positive_JJ emotions_NN2 but_CCB also_RR with_IW high_JJ negative_JJ arousal_NN1 emotions_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 anger_NN1 and_CC fear_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ are_VBR expressed_VVN with_IW very_RG high_JJ F0_FO mean_JJ variability_NN1 and_CC wide_JJ F0_FO variability_NN1 (_( Juslin_NP1 &;_NULL Laukka_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC ;_; Scherer_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, in_II 21%_NNU of_IO rare-target_JJ trials_NN2 at_II SOA0_FO ,_, participants_NN2 simply_RR continued_VVD making_VVG the_AT frequent_JJ response_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 switching_VVG to_II the_AT other_JJ response_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT most_RGT neutral_JJ CV_NN1 nonwords_NN2 were_VBDR combined_VVN to_TO form_VVI six_MC CVCV_NP1 nonwords_NN2 ,_, see_VV0 Appendix_NN1 B_ZZ1 for_IF a_AT1 list_NN1 of_IO the_AT neutral_JJ nonwords_NN2 used_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 propose_VV0 that_CST within_II higher_JJR gender_NN1 egalitarian_NN1 nations_NN2 ,_, there_EX will_VM be_VBI a_AT1 weaker_JJR gender_NN1 difference_NN1 in_II leader_NN1 emergence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT variable_NN1 Grant_NP1 captures_VVZ if_CS the_AT subjects_NN2 receive_VV0 any_DD kind_NN1 of_IO financial_JJ aid_NN1 for_IF their_APPGE studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Frotteurism_NP1 :_: "_" Have_VH0 you_PPY ever_RR been_VBN sexually_RR aroused_VVN by_II touching_VVG or_CC by_II rubbing_VVG yourself_PPX1 against_II a_AT1 stranger_NN1 ?_? "_" ;_; 6_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Four_MC explanatory_JJ variables_NN2 are_VBR central_JJ to_II our_APPGE exploration_NN1 of_IO the_AT mechanism_NN1 of_IO SBM_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT preceding_JJ sections_NN2 demonstrate_VV0 that_CST key_JJ features_NN2 of_IO grouping_NN1 data_NN can_VM be_VBI accounted_VVN for_IF as_RG emergent_JJ properties_NN2 of_IO our_APPGE bottom-up_NN1 model_NN1 that_CST are_VBR insensitive_JJ to_II the_AT precise_JJ choice_NN1 of_IO tuning_VVG parameters_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Comparison_NN1 is_VBZ difficult_JJ ,_, as_CSA sample_NN1 and_CC measurement_NN1 strategies_NN2 differ_VV0 across_II studies_NN2 ;_; however_RR ,_, the_AT message_NN1 remains_VVZ consistent_JJ :_: OA_NP1 condom_NN1 use_NN1 is_VBZ infrequent_JJ (_( Glaude-Hosch_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Schick_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 single_JJ peck_NN1 to_II one_MC1 of_IO these_DD2 initial-link_JJ stimuli_NN2 extinguished_VVD both_DB2 keys_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT less_RGR certain_JJ predictions_NN2 are_VBR cases_NN2 with_IW criminal_JJ records_NN2 that_CST fall_VV0 in_II the_AT discretionary_JJ middle_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, are_VBR subject_II21 to_II22 decision_NN1 maker_NN1 discretion_NN1 )_) ,_, but_CCB we_PPIS2 also_RR can_VM control_VVI extensively_RR for_IF the_AT criminal_JJ record_NN1 characteristics_NN2 that_CST comprise_VV0 this_DD1 group_NN1 and_CC any_DD minor_JJ decision-maker_NN1 variation_NN1 is_VBZ exogenous_JJ to_II the_AT individual_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 subsequent_JJ arrest_NN1 behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC ,_, importantly_RR ,_, associations_NN2 between_II the_AT ERN_NN1 and_CC individual_JJ differences_NN2 are_VBR not_XX identical_JJ between_II males_NN2 and_CC females_NN2 (_( Moran_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Moser_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, seeking_VVG and_CC receiving_VVG normative_JJ social_JJ influence_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 primitive_NN1 and_CC essential_JJ human_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC qualitative_JJ meta-analyses_NN2 used_VVD Caret_NP1 software_NN1 (_( Van_NP1 Essen_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Van_NP1 Essen_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC )_) to_TO examine_VVI brain_NN1 activation_NN1 patterns_NN2 underlying_VVG magnitude_NN1 processing_VVG across_II studies_NN2 (_( Cantlon_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009b_FO ;_; Cohen_NP1 Kadosh_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD two_MC items_NN2 ,_, involving_VVG the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO nature_NN1 ,_, represent_VV0 the_AT biospheric_JJ values_NN2 (_( Stern_NN1 ,_, Dietz_NP1 ,_, Abel_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Guagnano_NP1 ,_, 1998_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Inherited_JJ trauma_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO haunt_VVI us_PPIO2 than_CSN trauma_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ experienced_VVN directly_RR and_CC is_VBZ therefore_RR more_RGR accessible_JJ to_II working_VVG through_II (_( Abraham_NP1 ,_, 1975_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lifespan_NN1 variation_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 important_JJ ,_, but_CCB not_XX yet_RR routinely_RR measured_VVN ,_, indicator_NN1 for_IF understanding_VVG national_JJ and_CC socioeconomic_JJ inequalities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Paying_VVG attention_NN1 to_II environmental_JJ consequences_NN2 involves_VVZ an_AT1 evaluation_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 behaviors_NN2 or_CC others_NN2 '_NULL behaviors_NN2 with_IW consequences_NN2 for_IF the_AT environment_NN1 (_( Fransson_NP1 &;_NULL G?rling_NP1 ,_, 1999_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA indicated_VVN in_II Table_NN1 3_MC ,_, in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO subjects_NN2 unaware_JJ of_IO the_AT discrepancies_NN2 between_II the_AT original_JJ and_CC post-event_JJ materials_NN2 ,_, RSA_NP1 was_VBDZ barely_RR effective_JJ in_II reducing_VVG the_AT number_NN1 of_IO answers_NN2 consistent_JJ with_IW misinformation_NN1 :_: the_AT difference_NN1 in_II this_DD1 number_NN1 between_II groups_NN2 with_IW and_CC without_IW RSA_NP1 was_VBDZ significant_JJ only_RR in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 critical_JJ item_NN1 out_II21 of_II22 six_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 online_JJ questionnaire_NN1 ,_, using_VVG Qualtrics_NN2 ,_, was_VBDZ sent_VVN to_II head_JJ teachers_NN2 or_CC receptionists_NN2 in_II schools_NN2 identified_VVN by_II the_AT sampling_NN1 strategy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Herein_RR ,_, theorized_VVD motivations_NN2 are_VBR arranged_VVN into_II three_MC distinct_JJ categories_NN2 :_: Strategic_JJ motivations_NN2 ,_, deviance_NN1 motivations_NN2 ,_, and_CC positive_JJ motivations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Susan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 perception_NN1 may_VM be_VBI more_RGR consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT social_JJ reality_NN1 of_IO the_AT situation_NN1 (_( e.g._REX it_PPH1 is_VBZ generally_RR perceived_VVN as_CSA inspiring_JJ Duty_NN1 )_) than_CSN Dana_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 may_VM still_RR be_VBI idiosyncratic_JJ to_II some_DD degree_NN1 (_( e.g._REX she_PPHS1 may_VM experience_VVI the_AT particular_JJ tasks_NN2 as_CSA inspiring_JJ duty_NN1 much_RR more_DAR than_CSN most_DAT people_NN )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT presence_NN1 of_IO retail_JJ and_CC restaurants_NN2 in_II broader_JJR spatial_JJ districts_NN2 likely_JJ impacts_NN2 the_AT number_NN1 of_IO patrons_NN2 ,_, and_CC we_PPIS2 found_VVD that_CST such_DA locations_NN2 experienced_VVD an_AT1 elevated_JJ robbery_NN1 risk_NN1 well_RR into_II the_AT evening_NNT1 on_II both_RR weekdays_NNT2 and_CC weekends_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 conducted_VVD our_APPGE experiments_NN2 in_II 2016_MC and_CC 2017_MC in_II the_AT labs_NN2 of_IO the_AT Universities_NN2 of_IO Graz_NP1 and_CC Innsbruck_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 investigate_VV0 ethnic-group_JJ differences_NN2 in_II perceptions_NN2 of_IO legitimacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT design_NN1 ,_, there_EX were_VBDR replicates_VVZ for_IF each_DD1 participant_NN1 and_CC item_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Studies_NN2 have_VH0 demonstrated_VVN that_CST genetic_JJ factors_NN2 contribute_VV0 to_II development_NN1 of_IO depression19_FO and_CC other_JJ common_JJ psychiatric_JJ conditions_NN2 like_II anxiety39_FO ;_; however_RR ,_, whether_CSW these_DD2 have_VH0 any_DD relevance_NN1 to_II dysmenorrhea_NN1 remains_VVZ unknown_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Apart_II21 from_II22 English_NN1 as_II a_AT1 first_MD language_NN1 ,_, researchers_NN2 investigated_VVD :_: Japanese_NN1 (_( Sekiyama_NP1 &;_NULL Burnham_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Sekiyama_NP1 &;_NULL Tohkura_NP1 ,_, 1991_MC ;_; Sekiyama_NP1 &;_NULL Tokhura_NP1 ,_, 1993_MC )_) ,_, Chinese_NP1 (_( Chen_NP1 &;_NULL Hazan_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Hazan_NP1 &;_NULL Li_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Sekiyama_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC )_) ,_, Finnish_JJ (_( Sams_NP2 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1998_MC )_) ,_, Italian_NN1 (_( Bovo_NP1 ,_, Ciorba_NP1 ,_, Prosser_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Martini_NN1 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Gentilucci_NP1 &;_NULL Cattaneo_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) and_CC the_AT illusion_NN1 occurring_VVG in_II subjects_NN2 who_PNQS had_VHD English_JJ as_II a_AT1 second_MD language_NN1 (_( Chen_NP1 &;_NULL Hazan_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Hazan_NP1 &;_NULL Li_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Hardison_NP1 ,_, 1999_MC ;_; Sekiyama_NP1 &;_NULL Burnham_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, some_DD other_JJ studies_NN2 have_VH0 failed_VVN to_TO support_VVI the_AT possible_JJ role_NN1 of_IO the_AT purine_JJ cycle_NN1 in_II MDD_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 test_VV0 our_APPGE model_NN1 in_II a_AT1 sample_NN1 of_IO 2,363_MC participants_NN2 from_II the_AT Wisconsin_NP1 Longitudinal_JJ Survey_NN1 using_VVG a_AT1 time-lagged_JJ design_NN1 where_CS job_NN1 demands_NN2 and_CC job_NN1 control_NN1 were_VBDR measured_VVN 7_MC years_NNT2 prior_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 follow-up_JJ survey_NN1 where_CS participant_NN1 death_NN1 was_VBDZ assessed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT theorized_JJ process_NN1 of_IO change_NN1 in_II CBT_NP1 is_VBZ different_JJ (_( see_VV0 Reynolds_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 recent_JJ study_NN1 reported_VVD no_AT differences_NN2 comparing_VVG the_AT valence_NN1 of_IO mind-related_JJ comments_NN2 for_IF mothers_NN2 with_IW BPD_NP1 with_IW those_DD2 with_IW no_AT diagnosis_NN1 (_( Marcoux_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT intra-operative_JJ macroscopic_JJ findings_NN2 confirmed_VVD the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO the_AT unstable_JJ plaques_NN2 observed_VVN at_II contrast_NN1 ultrasound_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_JJR studies_NN2 are_VBR needed_VVN to_TO clarify_VVI whether_CSW these_DD2 unfavourable_JJ sleep_NN1 characteristics_NN2 in_II the_AT long_JJ run_NN1 contribute_VV0 to_II the_AT progression_NN1 of_IO obesity_NN1 in_II children_NN2 with_IW overweight/obese_JJ parents_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Study_NN1 1b_FO ,_, participants_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO imagine_VVI that_CST they_PPHS2 were_VBDR given_VVN enough_DD money_NN1 to_TO make_VVI two_MC purchases_NN2 :_: an_AT1 electronic_JJ gadget_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 lifetime_NNT1 membership_NN1 at_II a_AT1 local_JJ museum_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ to_II most_DAT studies_NN2 in_II this_DD1 area_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 operationalise_VV0 the_AT criterion_NN1 of_IO career_NN1 success_NN1 by_II its_APPGE objective_NN1 or_CC extrinsic_JJ indicators_NN2 ,_, particularly_RR by_II level_NN1 of_IO pay_NN1 and_CC occupational_JJ status_NN1 (_( e.g._REX Heslin_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 alternative_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 recalibration_NN1 processes_NN2 can_VM begin_VVI when_RRQ the_AT carrier_NN1 word_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN fully_RR presented_VVN ,_, including_II the_AT ambiguous_JJ segment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT combined_JJ association_NN1 of_IO IDS_NN2 prosody_NN1 with_IW linguistic_JJ outcomes_NN2 was_VBDZ smaller_JJR but_CCB also_RR significant_JJ and_CC in_II the_AT positive_JJ direction_NN1 (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO 0.17_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 support_II32 of_II33 this_DD1 assumption_NN1 are_VBR findings_NN2 that_CST sway_VV0 variability_NN1 increases_VVZ as_CSA balance_NN1 is_VBZ challenged_VVN by_II a_AT1 difficult_JJ standing_NN1 task_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, standing_VVG on_II one_MC1 foot_NN1 ,_, visual_JJ deprivation_NN1 )_) or_CC pathology_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, age_NN1 ,_, Parkinson_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 )_) compared_VVN to_II young_JJ and_CC healthy_JJ individuals_NN2 (_( Adkin_NP1 ,_, Frank_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Jog_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; de_NP1 Haart_NP1 ,_, Geurts_NP1 ,_, Huidekoper_NP1 ,_, Fasotti_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL van_NP1 Limbeek_NP1 ,_, 2004_MC ;_; Prieto_NP1 ,_, Myklebust_NP1 ,_, Hoffmann_NP1 ,_, Lovett_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Myklebust_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC ;_; Vuillerme_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 therefore_RR tested_VVD whether_CSW alpha_NN1 phase_NN1 and_CC peak-frequency_NN1 were_VBDR related_VVN to_II temporal_JJ judgments_NN2 of_IO longer_JJR durations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD ,_, the_AT age_NN1 effect_NN1 for_IF subgroups_NN2 of_IO white_JJ ,_, black_JJ ,_, Hispanic_JJ ,_, male_NN1 ,_, and_CC female_JJ defendants_NN2 were_VBDR examined_VVN ,_, as_RG well_RR as_CSA for_IF all_DB race/ethnicity_NN1 and_CC gender_NN1 combinations_NN2 ,_, and_CC for_IF each_DD1 crime_NN1 type_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
People_NN on_II this_DD1 list_NN1 were_VBDR ranked_VVN by_II the_AT proportions_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE earnings_NN2 without_IW displaying_VVG the_AT donated_JJ amount_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ ,_, together_RL with_IW the_AT list_NN1 being_VBG updated_VVN after_II 4_MC ,_, 15_MC ,_, and_CC 25_MC seconds_NNT2 ,_, was_VBDZ intended_VVN to_TO create_VVI the_AT illusion_NN1 that_CST positions_NN2 were_VBDR still_RR contestable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX have_VHI estimates_NN2 of_IO the_AT area-wide_JJ benefits_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 approach_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ difficult_JJ to_TO assess_VVI whether_CSW hot_JJ spots_NN2 policing_VVG strategies_NN2 applied_VVD broadly_RR in_II jurisdictions_NN2 would_VM have_VHI meaningful_JJ effects_NN2 on_II overall_JJ crime_NN1 trends_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Questions_NN2 are_VBR read_VVN aloud_RR ,_, and_CC children_NN2 are_VBR told_VVN that_CST they_PPHS2 can_VM listen_VVI to_II the_AT passages_NN2 again_RT if_CS they_PPHS2 wish_VV0 ,_, although_CS no_AT children_NN2 chose_VVD this_DD1 option_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT percentage_NN1 of_IO participants_NN2 in_II each_DD1 group_NN1 meeting_NN1 criteria_NN2 for_IF caseness_NN1 in_II fatigue_NN1 ,_, depression_NN1 ,_, anxiety_NN1 ,_, inattention_NN1 ,_, and_CC hyperactivity_NN1 or_CC impulsivity_NN1 were_VBDR compared_VVN using_VVG chi-square_JJ analyses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, imagine_VV0 a_AT1 conversation_NN1 between_II John_NP1 and_CC Sophia_NP1 at_II a_AT1 party_NN1 they_PPHS2 are_VBR hosting_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hierarchical_JJ linear_JJ regression_NN1 was_VBDZ also_RR utilized_VVN to_TO examine_VVI the_AT predictive_JJ capacity_NN1 of_IO therapist_NN1 and_CC observer_NN1 ratings_NN2 of_IO resistance_NN1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 treatment_NN1 (_( worry_VV0 )_) outcomes_NN2 (_( see_VV0 Table_NN1 4_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, researchers_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX study_VVI prejudices_NN2 towards_II established_JJ outgroups_NN2 in_II society_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 homeless_JJ people_NN ,_, sex_NN1 workers_NN2 ,_, or_CC drug_NN1 users_NN2 (_( Crandall_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Larger_JJR studies_NN2 are_VBR though_RR needed_VVN to_TO clarify_VVI the_AT prognostic_JJ value_NN1 of_IO plaque_NN1 vascularization_NN1 detection_NN1 in_II asymptomatic_JJ patients_NN2 with_IW non-severe_JJ carotid_JJ stenosis_NN1 that_CST are_VBR not_XX candidated_VVN for_IF surgery_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF scoring_NN1 ,_, the_AT number_NN1 of_IO correct_JJ responses_NN2 in_II the_AT postswitch_NN1 condition_NN1 was_VBDZ used_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS we_PPIS2 expected_VVD the_AT more_RGR sparse_JJ context-independent_JJ strategy_NN1 to_TO be_VBI indicated_VVN by_II the_AT RO_NN1 pattern_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ corresponds_VVZ moreover_RR to_II the_AT more_RGR efficient_JJ responding_VVG strategy_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Landgraf_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, we_PPIS2 hypothesized_VVD that_CST ,_, overall_RR ,_, the_AT RO_NN1 pattern_NN1 would_VM be_VBI associated_VVN with_IW shorter_JJR RTs_NP1 than_CSN the_AT RMO_NN1 pattern_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG this_DD1 first_MD syllable_NN1 ,_, the_AT other_JJ distractors_NN2 in_II the_AT six-_NN1 and_CC 12-syllable_JJ conditions_NN2 were_VBDR steadily_RR spread_VVN over_II the_AT retention_NN1 interval_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 explanation_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST major_JJ shifts_NN2 in_II public_JJ discourse_NN1 ,_, public_NN1 opinion_NN1 ,_, or_CC public_JJ policy_NN1 lead_NN1 to_II greater_JJR awareness_NN1 of_IO targeted_JJ groups_NN2 and_CC research_NN1 attention_NN1 in_II the_AT field_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II following_VVG Kuzel_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1992_MC )_) recommendations_NN2 ,_, I_PPIS1 initially_RR anticipated_VVD that_CST interviewing_VVG around_RG eight_MC judges_NN2 who_PNQS varied_VVD primarily_RR along_II the_AT punitiveness_NN1 continuum_NN1 would_VM be_VBI sufficient_JJ to_TO provide_VVI saturation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, the_AT framework_NN1 also_RR highlighted_VVN that_CST theories_NN2 at_II the_AT mental_JJ level_NN1 can_VM systematically_RR organise_VVI functional_JJ knowledge_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, heuristic_JJ value_NN1 )_) and_CC generate_VV0 new_JJ hypotheses_NN2 about_II the_AT conditions_NN2 under_II which_DDQ those_DD2 effects_NN2 occur_VV0 (_( i.e._REX ,_, predictive_JJ value_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Based_VVN on_II these_DD2 findings_NN2 ,_, the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 adopted_VVD a_AT1 similar_JJ method_NN1 to_TO examine_VVI responsive_JJ support_NN1 in_II the_AT parent-athlete_JJ relationship_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 want_VV0 to_TO improve_VVI our_APPGE understanding_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ labor_NN1 market_NN1 considerations_NN2 determine_VV0 education_NN1 decisions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 includes_VVZ verbal_JJ expressions_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, verbally_RR empathizing_VVG )_) ,_, a_AT1 warm_JJ tone_NN1 of_IO voice_NN1 ,_, warm_JJ facial_JJ expressions_NN2 ,_, and_CC body_NN1 postures/behaviors_NN2 showing_VVG warmth_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO building_VVG the_AT relationship_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, touching_VVG )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT equality_NN1 of_IO the_AT empirical_JJ distributions_NN2 in_II (_( 4_MC )_) can_VM be_VBI tested_VVN only_RR if_CS there_EX is_VBZ at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 correct_JJ response_NN1 and_CC one_MC1 incorrect_JJ response_NN1 to_II item_NN1 i_ZZ1 among_II the_AT persons_NN2 with_IW the_AT sufficient_JJ statistic_NN1 equal_JJ to_II s_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Health_NN1 practitioners_NN2 and_CC social_JJ marketers_NN2 need_VV0 to_TO explore_VVI the_AT hereditary_JJ factor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR thank_VV0 Dr._NNB Suzanne_NP1 Curtin_NP1 for_IF her_APPGE helpful_JJ comments_NN2 on_II an_AT1 earlier_JJR draft_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 manuscript_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT means_NN for_IF the_AT interaction_NN1 (_( Table_NN1 1a_FO )_) show_VV0 evidence_NN1 of_IO the_AT MNE_NP1 :_: impaired_JJ memory_NN1 for_IF information_NN1 that_CST ,_, in_II theory_NN1 ,_, posed_VVD a_AT1 high_JJ self-threat_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD aim_NN1 of_IO the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO illuminate_VVI the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO non-monotonic_JJ arousalmemory_JJ associations_NN2 on_II the_AT conclusions_NN2 based_VVN on_II conditional_NN1 and_CC unconditional_JJ context_NN1 memory_NN1 measures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, not_XX taking_VVG a_AT1 medical_JJ test_NN1 may_VM mean_VVI that_CST a_AT1 person_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX treated_VVN early_RR enough_RR to_TO halt_VVI the_AT progress_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 serious_JJ disease_NN1 ,_, and_RR31 so_RR32 on_RR33 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, suboptimal_JJ social_JJ interactions_NN2 explain_VV0 deviant_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT alternative_NN1 (_( 1_MC1 )_) model_NN1 contained_VVD the_AT full_JJ fixed_JJ effects_NN2 structure_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT null_JJ (_( 0_MC )_) model_NN1 lacked_VVD the_AT 2_MC ×_II 2_MC interaction_NN1 between_II the_AT Prime_JJ Type_NN1 second_MD contrast_NN1 (_( A_ZZ1 vs_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
V_ZZ1 )_) and_CC Test_VV0 Modality_NP1 (_( A_ZZ1 vs_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
V_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 believe_VV0 this_DD1 bifactor_NN1 to_TO represent_VVI the_AT common_JJ hope_NN1 to_TO gain_VVI power_NN1 in_II the_AT DoPL_NN1 motives_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ substantiated_VVN by_II the_AT DoPL_NN1 scales_NN2 '_NULL very_RG high_JJ correlations_NN2 ,_, .59_MC <_FO rs_NNU2 <_FO .85_MC ,_, with_IW the_AT general_JJ power_NN1 motive_NN1 (_( Sch?nbrodt_NP1 &;_NULL Gerstenberg_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; see_VV0 study_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
James_NP1 McKeen_NP1 Cattell_NP1 did_VDD not_XX "_" Keep_VV0 calm_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Neural_JJ mechanisms_NN2 involved_JJ in_II determining_VVG such_DA extended_VVD ,_, "_" incapsulated_VVD "_" behavior_NN1 are_VBR not_XX understood_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, Aristotle_NP1 held_VVD that_CST the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO unpleasant_JJ emotions_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX an_AT1 indicator_NN1 of_IO happi-ness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD analysis_NN1 focused_VVN on_II the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO the_AT sentence_NN1 adverb_NN1 inte_NN1 '_NULL not_XX '_NULL in_II the_AT SC_FO and_CC the_AT MC_NN1 conditions_NN2 as_CSA compared_VVN to_II items_NN2 in_II corresponding_VVG sentential_JJ positions_NN2 in_II the_AT NC_NP1 conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, many_DA2 decades_NNT2 of_IO research_NN1 preceding_VVG the_AT modern_JJ era_NN1 of_IO neuroimaging_NN1 demonstrated_VVD the_AT evocation_NN1 of_IO visceral_JJ and_CC somatomotor_NN1 expressions_NN2 of_IO emotion_NN1 in_II brainstem_NN1 stimulation_NN1 studies_NN2 of_IO laboratory_NN1 animals_NN2 (_( Ledoux_NP1 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Confidence_NN1 intervals_NN2 were_VBDR reported_VVN as_CSA numbers_NN2 in_II roughly_RR half_DB as_RG many_DA2 papers_NN2 as_CSA those_DD2 providing_VVG confidence_NN1 intervals_NN2 in_II any_DD form_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX know_VVI whether_CSW the_AT increases_NN2 in_II attention-motor_NN1 network_NN1 connectivity_NN1 observed_VVN in_II our_APPGE study_NN1 were_VBDR also_RR present_JJ in_II the_AT delirium_NN1 patients_NN2 they_PPHS2 studied_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Selfreported_JJ crime_NN1 ,_, measured_VVN at_II 9_MC months_NNT2 ,_, used_VVD six_MC items_NN2 to_TO capture_VVI an_AT1 underlying_JJ latent_JJ factor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS eyewitness_NN1 confidence_NN1 tends_VVZ not_XX to_TO be_VBI perfectly_RR diagnostic_JJ of_IO face_NN1 identification_NN1 accuracy_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Sauer_NP1 &;_NULL Brewer_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ,_, the_AT methods_NN2 by_II which_DDQ confidence_NN1 and_CC accuracy_NN1 are_VBR analysed_VVN lead_NN1 to_II different_JJ conclusions_NN2 about_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT relationship_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
RWA_NP1 is_VBZ a_AT1 powerful_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 range_NN1 of_IO important_JJ social_JJ and_CC political_JJ phenomena_NN2 ,_, including_VVG more_DAR support_NN1 for_IF right-wing_JJ political_JJ parties_NN2 and_CC candidates_NN2 ,_, capital_NN1 punishment_NN1 ,_, military-based_JJ aggression_NN1 ,_, and_CC harsh_JJ sentences_NN2 for_IF lawbreakers_NN2 ,_, and_CC less_DAR support_NN1 for_IF environmentalism_NN1 and_CC international_JJ human_JJ rights_NN2 (_( see_VV0 McFarland_NP1 ,_, in_II press_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, once_CS the_AT animals_NN2 have_VH0 learned_VVN to_TO associate_VVI a_AT1 previously_RR irrelevant_JJ stimulus_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 reward_NN1 ,_, dopamine_VV0 neurons_NN2 shift_VV0 their_APPGE phasic_JJ activation_NN1 from_II the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO reward_NN1 delivery_NN1 to_II the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO presentation_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 predictive_JJ cue_NN1 &lsqb;_( 46_MC &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS a_AT1 genuine_JJ and_CC lasting_JJ training_NN1 effect_NN1 was_VBDZ present_JJ ,_, we_PPIS2 would_VM find_VVI :_: (_( a_ZZ1 )_) T4_FO accuracy_NN1 was_VBDZ significantly_RR higher_JJR than_CSN the_AT highest_JJT baseline_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, the_AT influence_NN1 of_IO at_RR21 least_RR22 some_DD of_IO these_DD2 factors_NN2 changes_NN2 with_IW age_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS model_NN1 fit_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX meaningfully_RR change_VVI when_RRQ the_AT residuals_NN2 are_VBR constrained_VVN to_TO be_VBI equal_JJ ,_, then_RT residual_JJ ME/I_FU is_VBZ supported_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_JJ data_NN for_IF trials_NN2 corresponding_VVG to_II those_DD2 in_II which_DDQ 3-3-3_MCMC lists_NN2 were_VBDR presented_VVN in_II the_AT unpredictable_JJ condition_NN1 were_VBDR subjected_VVN to_II analysis_NN1 (_( viz._REX In_II this_DD1 task_NN1 ,_, participants_NN2 sequentially_RR opposed_VVN each_DD1 of_IO the_AT four_MC fingertips_NN2 to_II the_AT tip_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE thumb_NN1 ,_, starting_VVG with_IW the_AT index_NN1 finger_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT role_NN1 of_IO emotions_NN2 in_II games_NN2 for_IF learning_NN1 is_VBZ often_RR seen_VVN as_CSA solely_RR enhancing_VVG engagement_NN1 and_CC motivation_NN1 (_( Jabbar_NP1 &;_NULL Felicia_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interoception_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 theoretically_RR and_CC practically_RR critical_JJ construct_VV0 for_IF understanding_VVG people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 psychological_JJ functioning_NN1 in_II both_DB2 healthy_JJ and_CC clinical_JJ populations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 also_RR allows_VVZ for_IF investigating_VVG any_DD potential_JJ heterogeneity_NN1 of_IO effects_NN2 depending_II21 on_II22 the_AT population_NN1 of_IO students_NN2 experiencing_VVG early_JJ or_CC late_JJ starting_NN1 schools_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 next_MD step_NN1 ,_, the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO language_NN1 on_II the_AT developmental_JJ relation_NN1 between_II theory_NN1 of_IO mind_NN1 and_CC metamemory_NN1 was_VBDZ analyzed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fewer_DAR adolescents_NN2 in_II the_AT DBT_NP1 group_NN1 made_VVD a_AT1 SA_NP1 during_II treatment_NN1 than_CSN the_AT TAU_NN1 group_NN1 ,_, but_CCB these_DD2 group_NN1 differences_NN2 were_VBDR not_XX statistically_RR significant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Contingency_NN1 and_CC person-situation_JJ theories_NN2 of_IO leadership_NN1 purport_VV0 that_CST the_AT effectiveness_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 leader_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 influence_VV0 on_II others_NN2 depends_VVZ on_II the_AT interaction_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 leader_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 behavior_NN1 with_IW characteristics_NN2 of_IO the_AT context_NN1 (_( Avolio_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Yukl_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF spoken_JJ language_NN1 ,_, Mandarin_NN1 has_VHZ four_MC lexical_JJ tones_NN2 (_( high-level_JJ ,_, rising_VVG ,_, dipping_VVG and_CC falling_VVG )_) that_CST confer_VV0 prosodic_JJ features_NN2 to_II speech_NN1 at_II the_AT syllable_NN1 level_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT structural_JJ model_NN1 (_( Figure_NN1 1_MC1 )_) showed_VVD that_CST experienced_JJ neglect_NN1 was_VBDZ negatively_RR associated_VVN with_IW RSA_NP1 reactivity_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ in_II turn_NN1 was_VBDZ positively_RR associated_VVN with_IW negative_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO test_VVI for_IF G_ZZ1 ×_II E_ZZ1 ,_, predictors_NN2 included_VVD maltreatment_NN1 multiplicity_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT polygenic_JJ formative_JJ factor_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 Polygenic_JJ Formative_JJ Factor_NN1 ×_II Maltreatment_NN1 interaction_NN1 term_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, on_II tasks_NN2 requiring_VVG phonological_JJ output_NN1 (_( naming_NN1 and_CC CNRep_NP1 )_) her_APPGE scores_NN2 were_VBDR more_DAR than_CSN 3_MC SD_NP1 below_II the_AT TD_NN1 mean_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Prominent_JJ adult_NN1 development_NN1 theorists_NN2 propose_VV0 that_DD1 identity_NN1 is_VBZ unlikely_JJ to_TO develop_VVI linearly_RR toward_II more_RGR positive_JJ self-perception_NN1 (_( Kegan_NP1 ,_, 1983_MC ;_; Levinson_NP1 ,_, 1978_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, circulatory_JJ dynamics_NN is_VBZ thought_VVN to_TO play_VVI a_AT1 crucial_JJ role_NN1 in_II the_AT manifestation_NN1 of_IO language_NN1 symptoms_NN2 and_CC in_II the_AT degree_NN1 of_IO recovery_NN1 after_II lesions_NN2 in_II the_AT basal_JJ ganglia_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ in_II turn_NN1 are_VBR determined_VVN by_II the_AT extent_NN1 of_IO cortical_JJ neuronal_JJ loss_NN1 after_II prolonged_JJ occlusion_NN1 of_IO the_AT MCA_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Attention_NN1 allocation_NN1 skills_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN correlated_VVN with_IW language_NN1 abilities_NN2 in_II typically_RR developing_JJ infants_NN2 and_CC toddlers_NN2 (_( e.g._REX Dixon_NP1 &;_NULL Shore_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC ;_; Dixon_NP1 &;_NULL Smith_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC ;_; Kannass_NP1 &;_NULL Oakes_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Yu_NP1 &;_NULL Smith_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 result_NN1 supports_VVZ matching_VVG in_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 disconfirming_VVG ,_, specifically_RR for_IF stereotypical_JJ unintelligent_JJ subordinates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Meins_NN2 and_CC colleagues_NN2 have_VH0 reported_VVN significant_JJ but_CCB moderate_JJ correlations_NN2 for_IF both_DB2 appropriate_JJ (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO 0.53_MC )_) and_CC non-attuned_JJ maternal_JJ mind-related_JJ comments_NN2 (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO 0.37_MC )_) to_II the_AT same_DA infant_NN1 at_II 3_MC and_CC 7_MC months_NNT2 (_( subsample_VV0 from_II Sample_NN1 c_ZZ1 ,_, Meins_NN2 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ,_, but_CCB also_RR found_VVN that_CST parents_NN2 made_VVD more_RGR mind-related_JJ comments_NN2 (_( the_AT proportion_NN1 almost_RR twice_RR as_RG high_JJ )_) when_RRQ children_NN2 were_VBDR 7_MC months_NNT2 old_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II post-treatment_JJ assessment_NN1 (_( upper_JJ part_NN1 of_IO Table_NN1 10_MC )_) there_EX were_VBDR no_AT significant_JJ differences_NN2 between_II the_AT two_MC types_NN2 of_IO studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA renunciation_NN1 is_VBZ psychologically_RR demanding_VVG in_II the_AT best_JJT of_IO environments_NN2 and_CC is_VBZ particularly_RR difficult_JJ in_II the_AT cold_NN1 ,_, noisy_JJ and_CC rudimentary_JJ temporary_JJ camps_NN2 constructed_VVN on_II the_AT Ganges_NP1 '_NULL sandy_JJ floodplain_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS only_JJ samples_NN2 with_IW zero_NN1 change_NN1 variance_NN1 estimates_NN2 are_VBR considered_VVN ,_, however_RR ,_, the_AT degrees_NN2 of_IO freedom_NN1 reduce_VV0 to_II m_ZZ1 =_FO 1_MC1 for_IF the_AT generalized_JJ tests_NN2 and_CC m_ZZ1 =_FO 0_MC for_IF the_AT specific_JJ tests_NN2 because_CS one_PN1 testing_VVG parameter_NN1 (_( the_AT change_NN1 variance_NN1 )_) can_VM be_VBI treated_VVN as_II a_AT1 fixed_JJ or_CC known_JJ parameter_NN1 in_II the_AT full_JJ model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT likelihood_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 continuing_JJ gender_NN1 gap_NN1 ,_, in_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 we_PPIS2 seek_VV0 to_TO address_VVI both_DB2 the_AT explanatory_JJ mechanisms_NN2 and_CC boundary_NN1 conditions_NN2 for_IF the_AT gender_NN1 difference_NN1 in_II leader_NN1 emergence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS you_PPY have_VH0 made_VVN your_APPGE decision_NN1 ,_, mark_VV0 the_AT corresponding_JJ position_NN1 and_CC click_VV0 OK_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 have_VH0 not_XX overstated_VVN Rosenhan_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 claims_NN2 ;_; instead_RR ,_, his_APPGE claims_NN2 themselves_PPX2 are_VBR vast_JJ overstatements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, the_AT N2pc_FO did_VDD not_XX differ_VVI across_II different_JJ validity_NN1 conditions_NN2 in_II a_AT1 priming_NN1 task_NN1 where_RRQ participants_NN2 had_VHD to_TO identify_VVI the_AT cue_NN1 but_CCB not_XX to_TO hold_VVI it_PPH1 in_II memory_NN1 (_( Kumar_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recently_RR ,_, this_DD1 model_NN1 recovery_NN1 problem_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN identified_VVN and_CC is_VBZ now_RT well_RR understood_VVN (_( Nilsson_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Pachur_NP1 &;_NULL Kellen_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Spektor_NP1 &;_NULL Kellen_NP1 ,_, 2018_MC ;_; Walasek_NP1 &;_NULL Stewart_NP1 ,_, 2018_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 will_VM also_RR be_VBI important_JJ to_TO explore_VVI how_RGQ multicultural_JJ environments_NN2 impact_NN1 and_CC form_VVI communal_JJ models_NN2 of_IO leadership_NN1 among_II Christian_JJ leaders_NN2 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 social_JJ justice_NN1 and_CC intercultural_JJ work_NN1 and_CC spiritual_JJ service_NN1 to_II others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ increasing_JJ evidence_NN1 for_IF vagal_JJ innervation_NN1 of_IO the_AT human_JJ ventricle_NN1 ,_, although_CS the_AT functional_JJ role_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 innervation_NN1 remains_VVZ to_TO be_VBI elucidated_VVN (_( Coote_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Eleven_MC studies_NN2 found_VVD that_CST girls_NN2 were_VBDR at_II a_AT1 higher_JJR risk_NN1 of_IO internalizing_VVG problems_NN2 than_CSN boys_NN2 (_( e._ZZ1 g_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ahmad_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Betancourt_NP1 ,_, Salhi_NP1 ,_, et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; ?_? eri_NN2 &;_NULL Nas_NN2 ?_? ro_NN1 ?_? lu_NN1 ,_, 2018_MC ;_; Keles_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016b_FO ;_; Meyer_NP1 ,_, Steinhaus_NP1 ,_, Bangirana_NP1 ,_, Onyango-Mangen_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Stark_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC ;_; Oppedal_NP1 &;_NULL Idsoe_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, the_AT incremental_JJ improvements_NN2 across_II days_NNT2 1-4_MCMC reflect_VV0 a_AT1 combination_NN1 of_IO adapting_VVG these_DD2 methods_NN2 to_II the_AT digit_NN1 span_NN1 task_NN1 and_CC log-log_JJ increments_NN2 due_II21 to_II22 practice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, for_IF the_AT least-likely_JJ and_CC most-likely_JJ heuristics_NN2 ,_, the_AT weighting_NN1 functions_NN2 were_VBDR now_RT S-shaped_JJ instead_II21 of_II22 linear_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT severity_NN1 of_IO comorbid_JJ depressive_NN1 symptoms_NN2 may_VM also_RR have_VHI an_AT1 effect_NN1 on_II this_DD1 association_NN1 ,_, as_CSA mothers_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR depressed_JJ and_CC have_VH0 high_JJ anxiety_NN1 exhibit_NN1 less_RGR exaggerated_JJ affect_NN1 and_CC play_VV0 when_CS interacting_VVG with_IW their_APPGE infants_NN2 ,_, compared_VVN to_II depressed_JJ mothers_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR low_JJ on_II anxiety_NN1 (_( Field_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Beliefs_NN2 about_II infant_NN1 crying_NN1 and_CC appropriate_JJ responses_NN2 towards_II infants_NN2 can_VM influence_VVI how_RRQ mothers_NN2 themselves_PPX2 feel_VV0 in_II31 response_II32 to_II33 their_APPGE infants_NN2 '_NULL cries_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, the_AT respondents_NN2 on_II the_AT panel_NN1 may_VM have_VHI interpreted_VVN the_AT more_DAR or_CC less_DAR game_NN1 as_II a_AT1 dictator_NN1 situation_NN1 where_RRQ the_AT receiver_NN1 was_VBDZ the_AT experimenter_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 can_VM also_RR lead_VVI to_II competing_JJ predictions_NN2 ,_, taking_VVG into_II account_NN1 their_APPGE formal_JJ properties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_RR parental_JJ observed_JJ responsive_JJ support_NN1 and_CC athletes_NN2 '_NULL perceived_VVD parental_JJ responsiveness_NN1 ,_, mediated_VVN by_II athletes_NN2 '_NULL self-efficacy_NN1 ,_, were_VBDR positively_RR related_VVN to_II athlete_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 self-esteem_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 should_VM be_VBI addressed_VVN to_II a_AT1 greater_JJR extent_NN1 in_II future_JJ research_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, these_DD2 studies_NN2 have_VH0 relied_VVN on_II data_NN collected_VVN from_II one_MC1 informant_NN1 ,_, and_CC with_IW a_AT1 few_DA2 exceptions_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Fontaine_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Viding_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ,_, self-reported_JJ data_NN were_VBDR used_VVN most_RGT often_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT analysis_NN1 of_IO n-grams_NNU2 requires_VVZ two_MC fundamental_JJ operations_NN2 :_: store_NN1 and_CC query_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 nonverbal_JJ reasoning_NN1 was_VBDZ measured_VVN by_II the_AT Raven_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Standard_JJ Progressive_JJ Matrices_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, the_AT design_NN1 of_IO the_AT task_NN1 imposes_VVZ differential_JJ access_NN1 to_II information_NN1 on_II the_AT speakers_NN2 ;_; the_AT IG_NN1 has_VHZ a_AT1 map_NN1 with_IW all_DB the_AT information_NN1 including_II a_AT1 clearly_RR marked_JJ path_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, this_DD1 conjecture_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI verified_VVN from_II the_AT results_NN2 of_IO Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 because_CS ,_, at_II the_AT SOAs_NP2 tested_VVD ,_, the_AT process_NN1 of_IO narrowing_NN1 had_VHD not_XX yet_RR begun_VVN (_( Fig._NN1 4_MC ,_, open_JJ symbols_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA we_PPIS2 reach_VV0 the_AT end_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE collaboration_NN1 on_II this_DD1 research_NN1 together_RL ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 team_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 too_RR reflect_VV0 ;_; to_II what_DDQ extent_NN1 does_VDZ this_DD1 research_VVI reflect_VV0 a_AT1 means_NN to_II an_AT1 end_NN1 ,_, or_CC an_AT1 end_NN1 in_II itself_PPX1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Vrij_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2010_MC )_) suggest_VV0 that_CST these_DD2 findings_NN2 may_VM be_VBI the_AT product_NN1 of_IO anxiety_NN1 for_IF lie-tellers_NN2 rather_II21 than_II22 increased_JJ cognitive_JJ load_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Previous_JJ research_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_DD1 culture_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 important_JJ determinant_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
DOH_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 criminal_JJ background_NN1 check_NN1 process_NN1 involves_VVZ two_MC decision_NN1 points_VVZ :_: a_AT1 proposed_JJ (_( or_CC initial_NN1 )_) clearance_NN1 decision_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 final_JJ clearance_NN1 decision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Experiment_NN1 2_MC aimed_VVD to_TO replicate_VVI and_CC extend_VVI these_DD2 results_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS the_AT priming_NN1 paradigm_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR sensitive_JJ than_CSN the_AT recalibration_NN1 ,_, and_CC because_CS the_AT priming_NN1 effect_NN1 can_VM be_VBI measured_VVN within-subject_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 much_RR smaller_JJR sample_NN1 size_NN1 can_VM be_VBI used_VVN than_CSN in_II the_AT recalibration_NN1 experiments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 support_II32 of_II33 this_DD1 idea_NN1 ,_, Murase_NP1 ,_, Carter_NP1 ,_, DeChurch_NP1 ,_, and_CC Marks_NP1 (_( 2014_MC )_) demonstrated_VVD that_DD1 communication_NN1 affected_VVN the_AT accuracy_NN1 of_IO teams_NN2 '_NULL mental_JJ models_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 approaches_NN2 may_VM not_XX generalize_VVI to_II samples_NN2 of_IO children_NN2 who_PNQS do_VD0 not_XX show_VVI ExtB_NP1 problems_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, several_DA2 pieces_NN2 of_IO evidence_NN1 temper_NN1 the_AT conclusion_NN1 that_CST in_II healthy_JJ subjects_NN2 ,_, interference_NN1 occurs_VVZ at_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO semantic_JJ processing_NN1 as_II the_AT result_NN1 of_IO residual_JJ activation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_CS21 that_CS22 accuracy_NN1 may_VM mitigate_VVI the_AT negative_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO team_NN1 mental_JJ model_NN1 complexity_NN1 on_II the_AT behavioral_JJ components_NN2 of_IO teamwork_NN1 ,_, team_NN1 interventions_NN2 that_CST help_VV0 promote_VVI mental_JJ model_NN1 accuracy_NN1 may_VM help_VVI mitigate_VVI these_DD2 adverse_JJ consequences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Type_NN1 I_MC1 error_NN1 rates_NN2 across_II all_DB conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Judges_NN2 in_II South_NP1 Carolina_NP1 do_VD0 not_XX sit_VVI exclusively_RR in_II one_MC1 court_NN1 or_CC county_NN1 ,_, but_CCB instead_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 travel_VV0 throughout_II different_JJ counties_NN2 during_II the_AT year_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_IO all_DB participants_NN2 ,_, 12.2%_FO stated_VVN that_CST they_PPHS2 had_VHD been_VBN sexually_RR victimized_VVN (_( 6_MC men_NN2 ,_, 26_MC women_NN2 )_) ,_, and_CC 47.2%_FO that_CST they_PPHS2 knew_VVD someone_PN1 who_PNQS had_VHD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_NN1 10c_FO displays_VVZ the_AT estimated_JJ weights_NN2 for_IF the_AT responses_NN2 evaluated_VVN at_II the_AT 14_MC percentage_NN1 occasions_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ are_VBR noticeably_RR different_JJ from_II the_AT weight_NN1 function_NN1 given_VVN in_II Fig._NN1 9a_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ unknown_JJ whether_CSW 72_MC repetitions_NN2 of_IO the_AT sequence_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT same_DA exposure_NN1 )_) would_VM facilitate_VVI learning_VVG to_II a_AT1 similar_JJ extent_NN1 over_II a_AT1 longer_JJR duration_NN1 of_IO training_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 lower_JJR sequence_NN1 to_II noise_NN1 ratio_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, sixteen_MC blocks_NN2 of_IO training_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 sequence_NN1 to_II noise_NN1 ratio_NN1 of_IO 18:82_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ compatible_JJ with_IW existing_JJ evidence_NN1 of_IO pre-stimulus_JJ phase_NN1 effects_NN2 on_II the_AT probability_NN1 of_IO liminal_JJ stimulus_NN1 detection_NN1 (_( Busch_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Mathewson_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) and_CC fine-grained_JJ temporal_JJ judgments_NN2 (_( e.g._REX Baumgarten_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Cravo_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) where_CS all_DB stimulus_NN1 information_NN1 was_VBDZ presented_VVN and_CC contained_VVN within_II close_JJ temporal_JJ proximity_NN1 to_II stimulus_NN1 onset_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thirty-one_MC items_NN2 were_VBDR created_VVN for_IF this_DD1 study_NN1 ,_, with_IW the_AT intention_NN1 of_IO selecting_VVG the_AT 24_MC most_RGT suitable_JJ items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS no_AT new_JJ common_JJ environmental_JJ factors_NN2 explained_VVD variance_NN1 in_II shared_JJ perceptions_NN2 significantly_RR at_II age_NN1 12_MC or_CC 14_MC ,_, genetic_JJ factors_NN2 emerging_VVG at_II age_NN1 12_MC (_( 11_MC %_NNU at_II age_NN1 12_MC ;_; 4_MC %_NNU at_II age_NN1 14_MC )_) and_CC age_NN1 14_MC (_( 10_MC %_NNU at_II age_NN1 14_MC )_) were_VBDR significant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Research_NN1 on_II the_AT institutionalization_NN1 of_IO new_JJ academic_JJ disciplines_NN2 has_VHZ analyzed_VVN how_RGQ local_JJ institutional_JJ environments_NN2 influence_VV0 methodological_JJ agendas_NN2 within_II burgeoning_JJ disciplines_NN2 ,_, as_CSA in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO American_JJ sociology_NN1 departments_NN2 (_( Camic_JJ ,_, 1995_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recall_VV0 that_CST Naigles_NP1 and_CC Hoff-Ginsberg_NP1 used_VVD pooled_JJ speech_NN1 samples_NN2 of_IO maternal_JJ input_NN1 and_CC child_NN1 output_NN1 to_TO study_VVI how_RRQ input_NN1 properties_NN2 influenced_VVN the_AT acquisition_NN1 of_IO different_JJ verbs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Arguably_RR ,_, in_II31 comparison_II32 with_II33 logical_JJ and_CC probabilistic_JJ reasoning_NN1 tasks_NN2 in_II which_DDQ the_AT cued_VVN intuitive_JJ response_NN1 typically_RR entails_VVZ a_AT1 semantic_JJ prior_JJ belief_NN1 or_CC stereotypical_JJ information_NN1 ,_, the_AT critical_JJ physical_JJ transformation_NN1 in_II conservation_JJ tasks_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT apparent_JJ movement_NN1 of_IO the_AT objects_NN2 in_II the_AT row_NN1 )_) can_VM act_VVI as_II a_AT1 cue_NN1 that_CST directs_VVZ children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 attention_NN1 and_CC thereby_RR facilitates_VVZ monitoring_NN1 (_( De_NP1 Neys_NP2 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF most_DAT adolescent_JJ offenders_NN2 ,_, complete_JJ termination_NN1 from_II offending_NN1 occurs_VVZ in_II emerging_JJ adulthood_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Curvilinear_JJ trends_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR investigated_VVN statistically_RR by_II comparing_VVG the_AT linear_JJ model_NN1 to_II models_NN2 that_CST included_VVD a_AT1 quadratic_JJ and-if_CS necessary-cubic_JJ time_NNT1 terms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Accordingly_RR ,_, the_AT results_NN2 presented_VVN here_RL do_VD0 not_XX mean_VVI that_CST the_AT framing_JJ hypothesis_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 inaccurate_JJ account_NN1 of_IO phase_NN1 effects_NN2 at_II fine_JJ timescales_NN2 ,_, but_CCB they_PPHS2 may_VM suggest_VVI that_DD1 framing_NN1 ,_, if_CS true_JJ ,_, does_VDZ not_XX influence_VVI the_AT temporal_JJ judgment_NN1 of_IO longer_JJR durations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Within_II the_AT past_JJ decade_NNT1 ,_, a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO new_JJ conflicts_NN2 have_VH0 erupted_VVN ,_, e.g._REX civil_JJ wars_NN2 in_II Syria_NP1 and_CC South_NP1 Sudan_JJ as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT Rohingya_NP1 crisis_NN1 ,_, while_CS protracted_JJ crises_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 in_II Afghanistan_NP1 ,_, Somalia_NP1 ,_, and_CC the_AT Democratic_JJ Republic_NN1 of_IO Congo_NP1 continue_VV0 to_TO displace_VVI millions_NNO2 of_IO people_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 quasi-experimental_JJ pre-test_NN1 post-test_NN1 design_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 analyzed_VVD children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 learning_NN1 ,_, transfer_NN1 ,_, and_CC justifications_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 highlights_VVZ the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO considering_VVG not_XX just_RR the_AT location_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 businesses_NN2 ,_, but_CCB how_RRQ they_PPHS2 impact_VV0 the_AT walking_NN1 patterns_NN2 of_IO persons_NN2 (_( Hipp_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT assistants_NN2 followed_VVD an_AT1 interview_NN1 script_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ identical_JJ for_IF all_DB participants_NN2 across_II experimental_JJ conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Boundary_NN1 Variability_NN1 is_VBZ lower_JJR for_IF syllables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_DAR than_CSN 6_MC months_NNT2 after_II ictus_NN1 -_- Follow-up_JJ information_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 period_NN1 was_VBDZ available_JJ in_II 9_MC cases_NN2 :_: 6_MC were_VBDR normal_JJ (_( putaminal_JJ lesions_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Evidence_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 adolescent_JJ process_NN1 was_VBDZ missing_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 tasks_NN2 are_VBR used_VVN to_TO track_VVI the_AT development_NN1 of_IO spatial_JJ abilities_NN2 (_( Del_FW Guidice_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2000_MC ;_; Stiles_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, measure_VV0 individual_JJ and_CC sex_NN1 differences_NN2 in_II neurologically_RR healthy_JJ children_NN2 and_CC adults_NN2 (_( Levine_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1999_MC ;_; Hegarty_NP1 and_CC Waller_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ,_, and_CC assess_VV0 spatial_JJ impairments_NN2 following_VVG from_II genetic_JJ disorders_NN2 or_CC brain_NN1 damage_NN1 (_( Cornish_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1998_MC ;_; Hoffman_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Stiles_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ makes_VVZ them_PPHO2 an_AT1 important_JJ tool_NN1 for_IF understanding_VVG brain_NN1 function_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Future_JJ research_NN1 might_VM be_VBI enhanced_VVN by_II taking_VVG the_AT various_JJ parenting_NN1 aspects_NN2 into_II account_NN1 ,_, including_II parental_JJ scaffolding_NN1 (_( Kraybill_NP1 &;_NULL Bell_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 allows_VVZ us_PPIO2 to_II benchmark_NN1 the_AT question_NN1 according_II21 to_II22 the_AT individual_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 norm_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 a_AT1 collective_JJ norm_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Throughout_II development_NN1 ,_, individuals_NN2 may_VM use_VVI these_DD2 stories_NN2 for_IF a_AT1 variety_NN1 of_IO functions_NN2 within_II the_AT family_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO analyze_VVI the_AT differences_NN2 in_II scores_NN2 obtained_VVN ,_, in_II31 accordance_II32 with_II33 both_RR sex_NN1 and_CC age_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 means_NN contrast_NN1 was_VBDZ conducted_VVN for_IF independent_JJ samples_NN2 using_VVG Student_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 t_ZZ1 test_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT LC_NP1 has_VHZ direct_JJ projections_NN2 to_II the_AT hippocampus_NN1 (_( Samuels_NP1 &;_NULL Szabadi_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 has_VHZ been_VBN suggested_VVN that_CST the_AT LC_NP1 is_VBZ critically_RR important_JJ for_IF memory_NN1 formation_NN1 ,_, potentially_RR due_II21 to_II22 attentional_JJ modulation_NN1 of_IO hippocampal_JJ neurons_NN2 (_( Rowland_NP1 &;_NULL Kentros_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ recommended_VVN that_CST decreasing_JJ intake_NN1 of_IO whole_JJ milk_NN1 might_VM reduce_VVI the_AT health_NN1 risks_NN2 coming_VVG from_II consumption_NN1 of_IO more_RGR saturated_JJ fat_NN1 in_II milk_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 justifications_NN2 for_IF why_RRQ an_AT1 event_NN1 was_VBDZ impossible_JJ were_VBDR coded_VVN for_IF evidence_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 physical_JJ constraint_NN1 or_CC physical_JJ principle_NN1 that_CST would_VM preclude_VVI that_DD1 event_NN1 from_II occurring_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, these_DD2 characteristics_NN2 directly_RR influence_VV0 perceptions_NN2 of_IO fit_JJ ,_, which_DDQ in_II turn_NN1 influence_NN1 applicant_NN1 attraction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, consumers_NN2 '_NULL engagement_NN1 in_II pro-environmental_JJ purchase_NN1 behaviour_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX always_RR consistent_JJ with_IW their_APPGE intentions_NN2 :_: there_EX is_VBZ only_RR a_AT1 low_JJ to_TO moderate_VVI correlation_NN1 between_II environmental_JJ concern_NN1 and_CC behaviour_NN1 (_( Cleveland_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2005_MC ;_; Carrington_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Devinney_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Papaoikonomou_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Englis_NP1 and_CC Phillips_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 patterns_NN2 ,_, tracings_NN2 and_CC trails_NN2 can_VM be_VBI considered_VVN the_AT remnants_NN2 of_IO ourselves_PPX2 that_CST we_PPIS2 infuse_VV0 and_CC leave_VV0 behind_RL ;_; our_APPGE affect_NN1 and_CC energy_NN1 poured_VVN into_II spaces_NN2 and_CC atmospheres_NN2 (_( Griffero_NP1 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT causality_NN1 orientation_NN1 IAT_NN1 predicted_VVD the_AT experience_NN1 sampled_VVD motivational_JJ outcome_NN1 in_II participants_NN2 low_RR on_II dispositional_JJ mindfulness_NN1 ,_, but_CCB not_XX in_II participants_NN2 with_IW high_JJ dispositional_JJ mindfulness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ results_NN2 show_VV0 that_CST the_AT benefits_NN2 of_IO age_NN1 clearly_RR accrue_VV0 most_RGT strongly_RR and_CC consistently_RR to_II the_AT youngest_JJT defendants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 example_NN1 was_VBDZ in_II the_AT way_NN1 drug_NN1 cases_NN2 are_VBR handled_VVN ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT pattern_NN1 of_IO prosecutorial_JJ influence_NN1 toward_II more_RGR punitive_JJ sentences_NN2 in_II the_AT larger_JJR ,_, more_RGR populous_JJ counties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT integrated_JJ memory_NN1 model_NN1 would_VM suggest_VVI a_AT1 broader_JJR set_NN1 of_IO changes_NN2 are_VBR taking_VVG place_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 leads_VVZ to_II the_AT prediction_NN1 that_CST the_AT framing_JJ illusion_NN1 will_VM increase_VVI if_CSW some_DD or_CC all_DB of_IO the_AT numerical_JJ information_NN1 is_VBZ stripped_VVN out_II21 of_II22 the_AT options_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT available_JJ data_NN based_VVN on_II the_AT number_NN1 of_IO randomized_JJ controlled_JJ trials_NN2 favors_VVZ augmentation_NN1 with_IW second_MD generation_NN1 antipsychotic_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sympathy_NN1 for_IF the_AT victim_NN1 and_CC acceptance_NN1 of_IO rape_NN1 myths_NN2 were_VBDR stronger_JJR predictors_NN2 than_CSN belief_NN1 in_II a_AT1 just_JJ world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 describe_VV0 a_AT1 new_JJ method_NN1 for_IF measuring_VVG and_CC visualizing_VVG the_AT physical_JJ trajectory_NN1 of_IO movement_NN1 using_VVG video_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, memory_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO play_VVI an_AT1 important_JJ role_NN1 but_CCB there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 lack_NN1 of_IO consensus_NN1 on_II the_AT role_NN1 of_IO understanding_NN1 what_DDQ happened_VVD in_II the_AT past_NN1 in_II bringing_VVG about_RP therapeutic_JJ change_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT ADHD_NN1 group_NN1 demonstrated_VVD a_AT1 selective_JJ decrease_NN1 in_II power_NN1 within_II the_AT sigma_NN1 band_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 hypothesized_VVD that_DD1 anxiety_NN1 and_CC avoidance_NN1 would_VM both_RR be_VBI related_VVN to_II higher_JJR rates_NN2 of_IO mortality_NN1 and_CC lower_JJR well-being_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT relationship_NN1 between_II age_NN1 and_CC adjudication_NN1 withheld_VVN is_VBZ clearly_RR curvilinear_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perhaps_RR the_AT addition_NN1 of_IO quantity_NN1 announcements_NN2 would_VM be_VBI sufficient_JJ to_TO result_VVI in_II collusion_NN1 in_II that_DD1 case_NN1 ,_, or_CC allowing_VVG firms_NN2 to_TO announce_VVI strategies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 female_JJ leaders_NN2 and_CC lay_JJ leaders_NN2 along_II21 with_II22 younger-generation_JJ leaders_NN2 claim_VV0 that_CST their_APPGE leadership_NN1 is_VBZ collaborative_JJ leadership_NN1 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 will_VM be_VBI interesting_JJ to_TO investigate_VVI their_APPGE leadership_NN1 formation_NN1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 their_APPGE spiritual_JJ formation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, twins_VVZ studies_NN2 in_II which_DDQ dMRI_NN2 data_NN were_VBDR collected_VVN indicate_VV0 that_CST white_JJ matter_NN1 pathways_NN2 are_VBR indeed_RR heritable_JJ (_( Chiang_NP1 ,_, McMahon_NP1 ,_, de_NP1 Zubicaray_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Martin_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Kochunov_NP1 ,_, Jahanshad_NP1 ,_, Marcus_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Winkler_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 quadratic_JJ trajectory_NN1 model_NN1 with_IW 11_MC control_NN1 variables_NN2 exhibited_VVD adequate_JJ fit_NN1 :_: 2_MC (_( 69_MC )_) =_FO 93.13_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.05_MC ,_, CFI_NP1 =_FO 0.940_MC ,_, RMSEA_NP1 =_FO 0.063_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 reveal_VV0 that_CST parents_NN2 '_NULL responsiveness_NN1 could_VM be_VBI a_AT1 source_NN1 of_IO self-efficacy_NN1 for_IF athletes_NN2 to_TO accomplish_VVI their_APPGE sport-related_JJ goals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ targeted_VVN distraction_NN1 because_CS the_AT timing_NN1 of_IO the_AT distractor_NN1 is_VBZ designed_VVN to_II impact_NN1 processing_VVG during_II the_AT moment_NN1 when_RRQ any_DD computations_NN2 underlying_VVG recalibration_NN1 would_VM be_VBI taking_VVG place_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Subsequently_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 discuss_VV0 shared_JJ mental_JJ models_NN2 in_II teams_NN2 before_II outlining_VVG the_AT available_JJ evidence_NN1 on_II the_AT sources_NN2 of_IO influence_NN1 on_II mental_JJ models_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Taken_VVN together_RL ,_, our_APPGE results_NN2 speak_VV0 for_IF a_AT1 contribution_NN1 of_IO mathematical_JJ experience_NN1 to_II shaping_VVG and_CC processing_VVG mathematical_JJ concepts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT SMA_NN1 a_AT1 men_NN2 and_CC woman_NN1 (_( both_RR 60–69_MCMC years_NNT2 of_IO age_NN1 )_) were_VBDR found_VVN in_II one_MC1 apartment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO remove_VVI irrelevant_JJ features_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, neck_NN1 ,_, shoulders_NN2 ,_, and_CC space_NN1 around_II the_AT head_NN1 )_) and_CC maximize_VV0 the_AT size_NN1 of_IO facial_JJ stimuli_NN2 ,_, each_DD1 stimulus_NN1 was_VBDZ cropped_VVN to_II a_AT1 rectangle_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 .73:1_MC width-to-height_JJ ratio_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 aimed_VVD at_II identifying_VVG all_DB available_JJ parent-report_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO the_AT or_CC bond_NN1 and_CC to_TO appraise_VVI their_APPGE psychometric_JJ and_CC clinimetric_JJ properties_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Whilst_CS the_AT questionnaires_NN2 differ_VV0 slightly_RR from_II each_PPX221 other_PPX222 in_II focus_NN1 it_PPH1 is_VBZ worth_II noting_VVG that_CST items_NN2 that_CST consider_VV0 :_: (_( i_ZZ1 )_) expectant_JJ parents_NN2 '_NULL tendency_NN1 to_TO interact_VVI with_IW and_CC ascribe_VVI intentions_NN2 to_II the_AT fetus_NN1 are_VBR included_VVN in_II both_DB2 the_AT MAAS_NP2 and_CC MFAS_NN2 ;_; (_( ii_MC )_) differentiation_NN1 between_II self_NN1 and_CC the_AT fetus_NN1 are_VBR included_VVN in_II both_DB2 the_AT MAAS_NP2 and_CC PAI_NN1 ;_; and_CC (_( iii_MC )_) the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO positive_JJ thoughts_NN2 and_CC feelings_NN2 are_VBR included_VVN in_II both_DB2 the_AT MFAS_NP2 and_CC PAI_NN1 (_( for_IF a_AT1 fuller_JJR discussion_NN1 of_IO the_AT similarities_NN2 and_CC differences_NN2 between_II the_AT measures_NN2 ,_, see_VV0 van_NP1 den_NP1 Bergh_NP1 &;_NULL Simons_NP ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 pattern_NN1 of_IO results_NN2 indicates_VVZ that_CST the_AT degree_NN1 of_IO expertise_NN1 with_IW mathematical_JJ concepts_NN2 influenced_VVN semantic_JJ processing_NN1 differentially_RR over_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT findings_NN2 did_VDD not_XX change_VVI when_RRQ we_PPIS2 controlled_VVD for_IF concurrent_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO PA_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 used_VVD a_AT1 longitudinal_JJ mediation_NN1 analysis_NN1 to_TO examine_VVI whether_CSW the_AT prospective_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO health_NN1 at_II t1_FO on_II cynicism_NN1 at_II t2_FO were_VBDR mediated_VVN by_II increased_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO perceived_JJ constraints_NN2 ,_, depressive_NN1 symptoms_NN2 and_CC decreased_VVD levels_NN2 of_IO mastery_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, there_EX are_VBR some_DD new_JJ measures_NN2 and_CC approaches_VVZ to_II examining_VVG therapists_NN2 '_NULL MCCs_NP2 emerging_VVG (_( e.g._REX ,_, Hook_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Imel_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Compared_VVN with_IW the_AT controls_NN2 ,_, the_AT patients_NN2 had_VHD a_AT1 significantly_RR higher_JJR Mx_MC (_( 0.257_MC vs._II 0.399_MC ,_, p=0.036_FO )_) and_CC lower_JJR phase_NN1 shift_NN1 (_( 44.3°_FO vs._II 38.7°_FO in_II the_AT 0.07–0.20Hz_NNU frequency_NN1 band_NN1 ,_, p=0.019_FO )_) ,_, which_DDQ indicated_VVD impaired_JJ maintenance_NN1 of_IO constant_JJ cerebral_JJ blood_NN1 flow_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 delayed_JJ cerebrovascular_JJ autoregulatory_JJ response_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 acknowledge_VV0 this_DD1 as_CSA one_MC1 limitation_NN1 of_IO the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 source_NN1 of_IO constraining_VVG evidence_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT developing_JJ body_NN1 of_IO research_NN1 into_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 word_NN1 learning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Use_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 language_NN1 in_II which_DDQ positive_JJ and_CC negative_JJ yes-no_JJ questions_NN2 are_VBR structurally_RR identical_JJ may_VM help_VVI us_PPIO2 understand_VVI extant_JJ discrepancies_NN2 in_II the_AT literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Whites_NN2 may_VM assume_VVI Black_JJ individuals_NN2 are_VBR dangerous_JJ because_II21 of_II22 stereotypes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Cottrell_NP1 &;_NULL Neuberg_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC ;_; Devine_NP1 &;_NULL Elliot_NP1 ,_, 1995_MC )_) ,_, or_CC experience_VV0 physiological_JJ arousal_NN1 (_( Blascovich_NP1 ,_, Mendes_NP1 ,_, Hunter_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lickel_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC )_) ,_, anxiety_NN1 about_II how_RRQ to_TO act_VVI (_( e.g._REX ,_, Shelton_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Trawalter_NP1 ,_, Richeson_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Shelton_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, and_CC the_AT urge_NN1 to_TO avoid_VVI interracial_JJ contact_NN1 (_( Paladino_NP1 &;_NULL Castelli_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Plant_VV0 &;_NULL Devine_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS we_PPIS2 examined_VVD the_AT association_NN1 of_IO type_NN1 of_IO funding_NN1 with_IW whether_CSW organizations_NN2 offered_VVD evidence-based_JJ mental_JJ health_NN1 treatments_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD that_CST three_MC of_IO five_MC (_( or_CC 60%_NNU )_) behavioral_JJ health_NN1 organizations_NN2 reported_VVD offering_VVG EBPs_NN2 if_CS they_PPHS2 received_VVD federal/state/government_FU (_( F/S/G_ZZ1 )_) funding_NN1 ,_, but_CCB four_MC of_IO five_MC (_( or_CC 80%_NNU )_) also_RR offered_VVN treatments_NN2 with_IW weak_JJ or_CC no_AT evidence_NN1 base_NN1 (_( Table_NN1 4_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 data_NN suggest_VV0 that_CST advising_VVG smokers_NN2 to_TO use_VVI nicotine_NN1 lozenge_NN1 prior_II21 to_II22 anticipated_JJ smoking_JJ trigger_NN1 exposure_NN1 may_VM have_VHI benefits_NN2 in_II decreasing_JJ craving_NN1 and_CC withdrawal_NN1 symptom_NN1 severity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX were_VBDR no_AT significant_JJ differences_NN2 in_II the_AT levels_NN2 of_IO perceived_JJ fairness_NN1 between_II Mori_NP1 and_CC Europeans_NN2 (_( Cohen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 d_ZZ1 =_FO .04_MC )_) ,_, or_CC between_II Asian_JJ and_CC Pacific_NP1 people_NN (_( Cohen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 d_ZZ1 =_FO .06_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ worth_II noting_VVG that_CST targets_NN2 provided_VVD their_APPGE estimates_NN2 of_IO whether_CSW they_PPHS2 would_VM be_VBI recognized_VVN within_II minutes_NNT2 of_IO the_AT interaction_NN1 ,_, while_CS it_PPH1 was_VBDZ presumably_RR still_RR salient_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Null_JJ models_NN2 were_VBDR constructed_VVN by_II performing_VVG forward_RL step-wise_JJ regressions_NN2 including_II the_AT demographic_JJ variables_NN2 (_( sex_NN1 and_CC age_NN1 )_) and_CC signature_NN1 variables_NN2 (_( number_NN1 of_IO characters_NN2 in_II printed_JJ name_NN1 ,_, average_JJ character_NN1 area_NN1 in_II printed_JJ name_NN1 ,_, and_CC signature_NN1 style_NN1 )_) ,_, and_CC all_DB their_APPGE pair-wise_RR interactions_NN2 as_CSA predictors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 series_NN of_IO APIM_NN1 models_NN2 was_VBDZ utilized_VVN to_TO examine_VVI the_AT bidirectional_JJ relationships_NN2 between_II the_AT resilience_NN1 resources_NN2 and_CC the_AT reported_JJ symptoms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT working_JJ memory_NN1 and_CC episodic_JJ memory_NN1 for_IF which_DDQ dlPFC_NNU and_CC Hip_NN1 play_VV0 a_AT1 major_JJ role_NN1 can_VM host_VVI information_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ elaborated_VVN to_TO assemble_VVI the_AT plan_NN1 ,_, and_CC then_RT to_TO store_VVI it_PPH1 for_IF execution_NN1 (_( Miller_NP1 and_CC Cohen_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC ;_; Thill_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 underwent_VVD a_AT1 familiarization_NN1 session_NNT1 in_II the_AT simulator_NN1 room_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, the_AT internal_JJ consistencies_NN2 based_VVN on_II youth_NN1 self-reports_NN2 were_VBDR slightly_RR lower_JJR than_CSN for_IF caregiver_NN1 ratings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC of_IO the_AT most_RGT commonly_RR used_JJ indicators_NN2 in_II the_AT well-being_NN1 literature_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, life_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 and_CC subjective_JJ vitality_NN1 )_) were_VBDR adopted_VVN to_TO evaluate_VVI student-athletes_NN2 '_NULL global_JJ psychological_JJ well-being_NN1 (_( Lundqvist_NN1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 respondent_NN1 received_VVD at_RR21 most_RR22 three-quarters_MF of_IO the_AT prior_JJ survey_NN1 in_II each_DD1 area_NN1 by_II receiving_VVG three_MC panels_NN2 of_IO six_MC questions_NN2 each_DD1 rather_II21 than_II22 four_MC panels_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 short_RR22 ,_, expected_JJ utility_NN1 and_CC classical_JJ reinforcement_NN1 schemes_NN2 (_( Sutton_NP1 &;_NULL Barto_NP1 ,_, 1998_MC )_) are_VBR special_JJ cases_NN2 of_IO risk_NN1 sensitive_JJ control_NN1 that_CST are_VBR optimal_JJ when_CS (_( and_CC only_RR when_CS )_) different_JJ hidden_JJ states_NN2 generate_VV0 different_JJ outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Future_JJ studies_NN2 should_VM explore_VVI the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO IDS_NN2 on_II infant_NN1 development_NN1 without_IW ignoring_VVG its_APPGE interactions_NN2 with_IW the_AT other_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO the_AT parental_JJ communication_NN1 system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, thwarted_JJ goals_NN2 are_VBR more_RGR commonplace_JJ than_CSN addictions_NN2 ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST anyone_PN1 could_VM experience_VVI the_AT resulting_JJ aggressive_JJ motivations_NN2 and_CC intentions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS German_JJ adult_NN1 participants_NN2 did_VDD not_XX always_RR follow_VVI pragmatic_JJ restrictions_NN2 for_IF the_AT quantifiers_NN2 many_DA2 and_CC most_DAT ,_, we_PPIS2 analyzed_VVD children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 responses_NN2 accordingly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 potential_JJ issue_NN1 within_II this_DD1 area_NN1 of_IO study_NN1 is_VBZ inconsistent_JJ and_CC inconclusive_JJ findings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_RR21 far_RR22 the_AT most_RGT widely_RR used_JJ measure_NN1 of_IO narcissism_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT Narcissistic_JJ Personality_NN1 Inventory_NN1 (_( NPI_NP1 ;_; Raskin_NP1 &;_NULL Hall_NN1 ,_, 1979_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ consists_VVZ of_IO forced-choice_NN1 ,_, paired_VVD statements_NN2 where_CS one_MC1 option_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI endorsed_VVN by_II narcissistic_JJ individuals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT multiple_JJ group_NN1 CFA_NP1 incorporates_VVZ a_AT1 mean_JJ structure_NN1 into_II the_AT model_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ tests_VVZ relationship_NN1 equivalence_NN1 between_II indicators_NN2 and_CC factors_NN2 ,_, and_CC each_DD1 item_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 intercept_VV0 equivalence_NN1 between_II groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS we_PPIS2 introduce_VV0 more_RGR stringent_JJ matching_JJ criteria_NN2 ,_, the_AT effect_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX attenuated_VVN but_CCB becomes_VVZ larger_JJR and_CC more_RGR significant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
approaches_NN2 and_CC cultural_JJ adaptations_NN2 are_VBR common_JJ ,_, and_CC their_APPGE effectiveness_NN1 should_VM be_VBI evaluated_VVN in_II the_AT populations_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, values_NN2 in_II the_AT third_MD column_NN1 index_NN1 the_AT proportionate_JJ influence_NN1 of_IO age_NN1 14_MC etiological_JJ factors_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ can_VM explain_VVI variance_NN1 at_II age_NN1 14_MC only_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, internal_JJ consistency_NN1 could_VM only_RR be_VBI rated_VVN as_CSA '_NULL indeterminate_JJ '_NULL for_IF the_AT majority_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 measures_NN2 because_CS they_PPHS2 did_VDD not_XX demonstrate_VVI at_RR21 least_RR22 low_JJ evidence_NN1 of_IO '_NULL sufficient_JJ '_NULL structural_JJ validity_NN1 (_( as_CSA per_II the_AT COSMIN_NN1 criteria_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO assess_VVI differences_NN2 between_II therapy_NN1 completers_NN2 who_PNQS completed_VVD the_AT STQ_NP1 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 165_MC )_) and_CC those_DD2 who_PNQS did_VDD not_XX (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 1312_MC )_) ,_, a_AT1 series_NN of_IO independent_JJ samples_NN2 t-tests_NN2 (_( for_IF dimensional_JJ measures_NN2 )_) and_CC chi-square_NN1 (_( 2_MC )_) tests_NN2 (_( for_IF dichotomous_JJ variables_NN2 )_) were_VBDR carried_VVN out_RP ._. 
</s>
<s>
Despite_II the_AT prevalence_NN1 and_CC importance_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Monaghan_NP1 ,_, Christiansen_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Fitneva_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) of_IO arbitrariness_NN1 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 growing_JJ awareness_NN1 that_CST nonarbitrariness_NN1 is_VBZ also_RR an_AT1 important_JJ aspect_NN1 of_IO language_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Dingemanse_NP1 ,_, Blasi_NP1 ,_, Lupyan_NP1 ,_, Christiansen_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Monaghan_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ,_, for_IF a_AT1 review_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA predicted_VVN by_II the_AT calibration_NN1 principle_NN1 ,_, confidence_NN1 ratings_NN2 lowered_VVD the_AT DI_NN1 metric_JJ relative_II21 to_II22 categorical_JJ judg-ments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 range_NN1 of_IO experimental_JJ studies_NN2 has_VHZ suggested_VVN that_CST ,_, in_II sentence_NN1 comprehension_NN1 ,_, people_NN conceptualize_VV0 perceptual_JJ and_CC motor_NN1 details_NN2 beyond_II the_AT propositions_NN2 presented_VVD explicitly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Construct_VV0 reliabilities_NN2 using_VVG w_ZZ1 were_VBDR generally_RR higher_JJR and_CC for_IF affiliation_NN1 came_VVD close_RR to_II or_CC exceeded_VVD the_AT criterion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB I_ZZ1 '_NULL m_ZZ1 just_RR as_RG all_RR over_II the_AT place_NN1 as_CSA everyone_PN1 else_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II such_DA a_AT1 scenario_NN1 the_AT optimal_JJ understanding_NN1 of_IO speech_NN1 relies_VVZ on_II the_AT integration_NN1 of_IO the_AT synchronised_JJ signals_NN2 of_IO these_DD2 two_MC modalities_NN2 (_( Brancazio_NP1 ,_, Miller_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Paré_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 strategic_JJ HRM_NP1 role_NN1 that_CST emphases_VVZ changes_NN2 to_II an_AT1 organization_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 HRM_NP1 system_NN1 to_TO better_RRR align_VVI it_PPH1 with_IW established_JJ business_NN1 objectives_NN2 need_VM not_XX involve_VVI institutional_JJ entrepreneurship_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ study_NN1 used_VVD cTBS_NNU as_II TMS_NP1 parameters_NN2 developed_VVN by_II Huang_NP1 ,_, Edwards_NP1 ,_, Rounis_NP1 ,_, Bhatia_NP1 ,_, and_CC Rothwell_NP1 (_( 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Gustafsson_NN1 and_CC Ramstedt_NP1 investigated_VVD the_AT removal_NN1 of_IO personal_JJ alcohol_NN1 import_NN1 quotas_NN2 in_II Sweden_NP1 Finland_NP1 and_CC Denmark_NP1 ,_, and_CC large_JJ alcohol_NN1 tax_NN1 decreases_VVZ in_RP both_RR Denmark_NP1 and_CC Finland_NP1 (_( Gustafsson_NP1 and_CC Ramstedt_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, there_EX were_VBDR no_AT significant_JJ correlations_NN2 between_II inflammatory_JJ markers_NN2 and_CC antipsychotic_JJ monotherapy_NN1 (_( including_II olanzapine_NN1 )_) DDDs_NP1 or_CC serum_NN1 concentration_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT spring_NN1 of_IO 2016_MC the_AT level_NN1 of_IO organic_JJ residue_NN1 on_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 toilet_NN1 door_NN1 handles_NN2 were_VBDR measured_VVN in_II31 connection_II32 with_II33 inspections_NN2 that_CST were_VBDR conducted_VVN as_II part_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 project_NN1 focusing_VVG on_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 exposure_NN1 to_II chemicals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF TPCs_NP1 with_IW a_AT1 single_JJ anchor_NN1 (_( "_" Save_VV0 up_II21 to_II22 Y%_FO "_" )_) ,_, consumers_NN2 have_VH0 a_AT1 higher_JJR EPD_NN1 ,_, and_CC lower_JJR perceived_JJ savings_NN2 ,_, price_NN1 fairness_NN1 ,_, and_CC perceived_JJ value_NN1 for_IF TPCs_NP1 that_CST state_VV0 a_AT1 maximum_JJ implausible_JJ price_NN1 discount_NN1 than_CSN for_IF those_DD2 that_CST state_VV0 a_AT1 maximum_JJ plausible_JJ price_NN1 discount_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 expand_VV0 the_AT literature_NN1 by_II exploring_VVG another_DD1 critically_RR important_JJ type_NN1 of_IO identity_NN1 narrative_NN1 that_CST has_VHZ received_VVN little_DA1 research_NN1 attention_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT conditions_NN2 with_IW supposedly_RR human-controlled_JJ characters_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 instead_RR facilitated_VVD our_APPGE deception_NN1 by_II presenting_VVG a_AT1 rigged_JJ intercom_NN1 system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Previously_RR to_II the_AT study_NN1 ,_, the_AT volunteers_NN2 performed_VVD a_AT1 cervical_JJ and_CC transcranial_JJ duplex_JJ scan_NN1 ,_, with_IW a_AT1 HDI_NP1 5000_MC device_NN1 (_( Philips_NP1 ,_, USA_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE data_NN confirm_VV0 that_CST the_AT exposure_NN1 to_II the_AT SECPT_NN1 leads_VVZ to_II striking_JJ changes_NN2 in_II subjective_JJ feeling_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, the_AT time_NNT1 range_NN1 of_IO the_AT negativity_NN1 (_( 175-300_MCMC ms_NN1 )_) that_DD1 is_VBZ predicted_VVN as_II a_AT1 response_NN1 for_IF unexpected_JJ word_NN1 orders_NN2 ,_, and_CC which_DDQ thus_RR constitutes_VVZ the_AT main_JJ concern_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 study_NN1 ,_, precedes_VVZ the_AT point_NN1 after_II which_DDQ the_AT conditions_NN2 begin_VV0 to_TO differ_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT score_NN1 is_VBZ obtained_VVN using_VVG a_AT1 null_JJ classifier_NN1 which_DDQ always_RR predicts_VVZ the_AT label_NN1 most_RGT frequently_RR occurring_VVG in_II a_AT1 test_NN1 set_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II criminal_JJ investigations_NN2 ,_, when_CS the_AT perpetrator_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 crime_NN1 is_VBZ heard_VVN but_CCB not_XX seen_VVN ,_, the_AT degree_NN1 of_IO match_NN1 between_II vocal_JJ information_NN1 provided_VVN by_II the_AT perpetrator_NN1 and_CC suspect_NN1 constitutes_VVZ "_" forensic_JJ "_" evidence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II each_DD1 trial_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 picture_NN1 was_VBDZ displayed_VVN for_IF 3_MC seconds_NNT2 (_( see_VV0 footnote_NN1 1_MC1 )_) followed_VVD by_II a_AT1 new_JJ screen_NN1 displaying_VVG the_AT target_NN1 word_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT final_JJ sample_NN1 consisted_VVN of_IO 194_MC undergraduate_NN1 students_NN2 (_( 67.5%_FO female_NN1 ,_, n=131_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR several_DA2 alternative_JJ conceptualizations_NN2 of_IO perceptions_NN2 of_IO fit_JJ ,_, including_II supplementary_JJ vs._II complementary_JJ fit_JJ ,_, needs-supplies_NN2 fit_VV0 ,_, and_CC demand-abilities_NN2 fit_VV0 (_( Kristof_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Convergent_JJ validity_NN1 of_IO TWA_NN1 in_II the_AT naturalistic_JJ setting_NN1 was_VBDZ assessed_VVN by_II computing_VVG the_AT within-participant_JJ correlations_NN2 between_II TWA_NP1 and_CC PEP_NN1 across_II the_AT day_NNT1 on_II all_DB coded_JJ ambulatory_JJ periods_NN2 available_JJ for_IF a_AT1 particular_JJ participant_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, most_RGT firesetting_JJ offences_NN2 (_( 82.2%_FO )_) were_VBDR committed_VVN by_II BPD_NP1 women_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II some_DD cases_NN2 ,_, the_AT "_" Behavior_NN1 "_" column_NN1 may_VM also_RR pertain_VVI to_II clinical_JJ assessment_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, in_II parental_JJ reports_NN2 of_IO child_NN1 behavior_NN1 that_CST are_VBR used_VVN for_IF diagnostic_JJ purposes_NN2 in_II such_DA areas_NN2 as_CSA attention-deficit_JJ hyperactivity_NN1 disorder_NN1 (_( ADHD_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rats_NN2 were_VBDR deeply_RR anesthetized_VVN with_IW Nembutal_NP1 (_( 50_MC mg/kg_NNU ,_, intraperitoneally_RR )_) and_CC surgically_RR implanted_VVD with_IW bilateral_JJ cannula_NN1 above_II the_AT nucleus_NN1 basalis_NN1 magnocellularis_NN1 (_( NBM_NP1 :_: AP_NP1 0.8_MC ;_; ML_NNU ±_FO 2.5_MC ;_; DV_MC 4.3_MC mm_NNU ,_, Paxinos_NP1 and_CC Watson_NP1 ,_, 1986_MC )_) together_RL with_IW stainless_JJ steel_NN1 single-wire_NN1 recording_NN1 electrodes_NN2 placed_VVN in_II the_AT skull_NN1 overlying_VVG the_AT frontal_JJ (_( AP_NP1 :_: 3.0_MC mm_NNU ,_, ML_NNU :_: ±_FO 3.0_MC mm_NNU ,_, FR1_FO )_) cortex_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Annual_JJ family_NN1 income_NN1 was_VBDZ reported_VVN on_II a_AT1 25point_FO scale_NN1 ,_, ranging_VVG from_II low_JJ (_( "_" Less_DAR than_CSN $10,000_NNU "_" )_) to_II high_JJ (_( "_" More_RRR than_CSN $125,000_NNU "_" )_) in_II intervals_NN2 of_IO $5,000_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
Understanding_VVG it_PPH1 and_CC giving_VVG it_PPH1 meaningfulness_NN1 have_VH0 become_VVN obsessions_NN2 with_IW me_PPIO1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT possible_JJ ,_, yet_RR improbable_JJ ,_, events_NN2 were_VBDR growing_VVG a_AT1 beard_NN1 to_II one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 toes_NN2 ,_, eating_VVG pickle-flavored_JJ ice_NN1 cream_NN1 ,_, drinking_VVG onion_NN1 juice_NN1 ,_, painting_NN1 polka_NN1 dots_NN2 on_II an_AT1 airplane_NN1 ,_, and_CC finding_VVG an_AT1 alligator_NN1 under_II the_AT bed_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II the_AT Society_NN1 of_IO Clinical_JJ Psychology_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN at_II the_AT forefront_NN1 of_IO identifying_VVG and_CC disseminating_JJ ESTs_NP2 for_IF the_AT past_JJ two_MC decades_NNT2 and_CC is_VBZ one_MC1 of_IO the_AT most_RGT prominent_JJ organizations_NN2 dedicated_VVN to_II psychological_JJ ESTs_NP2 in_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ logical_JJ for_IF this_DD1 group_NN1 to_TO take_VVI the_AT lead_NN1 in_II this_DD1 next_MD phase_NN1 of_IO treatment_NN1 evaluation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Structural_JJ paths_NN2 are_VBR solid_JJ lines_NN2 and_CC covariance_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT dotted_JJ line_NN1 (_( for_IF simplicity_NN1 ,_, covariates_NN2 were_VBDR not_XX included_VVN )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II APA_NP1 guidelines_NN2 ,_, to_TO merit_VVI inclusion_NN1 as_CSA co-author_NN1 ,_, the_AT individual_NN1 should_VM have_VHI "_" been_VBN involved_JJ with_IW initial_JJ research_NN1 design_NN1 ,_, data_NN collection_NN1 and_CC analysis_NN1 ,_, manuscript_NN1 drafting_NN1 ,_, and_CC final_JJ approval_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL ,_, DROID_NP1 is_VBZ used_VVN to_TO register_VVI all_DB data_NN to_II a_AT1 common_JJ template_NN1 ;_; this_DD1 method_NN1 is_VBZ efficient_JJ and_CC produces_VVZ robust_JJ results_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
M.M._NNU was_VBDZ supported_VVN by_II the_AT Wellcome_NP1 Trust_NN1 and_CC London_NP1 Pain_NN1 Consortium_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, some_DD individuals_NN2 might_VM think_VVI of_IO wealth_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 selfenhancement_NN1 value_NN1 ,_, as_CSA similar_JJ to_II selftranscendence_NN1 values_NN2 (_( e.g._REX helpfulness_NN1 and_CC broadmindedness_NN1 )_) because_II21 of_II22 past_JJ experiences_NN2 that_CST pair_VV0 the_AT values_NN2 continuously_RR (_( e.g._REX earning_VVG money_NN1 to_TO save_VVI lives_NN2 as_II a_AT1 doctor_NN1 and_CC saving_VVG money_NN1 to_TO work_VVI abroad_RL as_II a_AT1 volunteer_NN1 )_) ,_, even_CS21 though_CS22 they_PPHS2 might_VM recognize_VVI conflicting_JJ motives_NN2 between_II these_DD2 values_NN2 in_II many_DA2 circumstances_NN2 (_( e.g._REX decisions_NN2 about_II whether_CSW to_TO donate_VVI money_NN1 to_II a_AT1 beggar_NN1 and_CC spending_VVG time_NNT1 to_TO help_VVI another_DD1 with_IW coursework_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS research_NN1 articles_NN2 were_VBDR the_AT target_NN1 of_IO the_AT search_NN1 ,_, review_VV0 articles_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR examined_VVN for_IF additional_JJ references_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II21 to_II22 SE_NP1 ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 consumers_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR low_JJ on_II this_DD1 trait_NN1 tend_VV0 to_TO seek_VVI status_NN1 meaning_NN1 in_II clothing_NN1 to_TO prop_VVI their_APPGE feelings_NN2 of_IO self-worth_JJ ,_, marketing_NN1 communications_NN2 should_VM attempt_VVI to_TO capture_VVI with_IW empathy_NN1 the_AT inner_JJ status_NN1 anxiety_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 group_NN1 of_IO consumers_NN2 and_CC then_RT present_VV0 their_APPGE brand_NN1 as_II a_AT1 solution_NN1 to_TO ameliorate_VVI that_DD1 anxiety_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Leadership_NN1 effectiveness_NN1 was_VBDZ based_VVN on_II supervisor-reports_NN2 ,_, although_CS different_JJ items_NN2 assessing_VVG leadership_NN1 effectiveness_NN1 were_VBDR used_VVN for_IF each_DD1 sample_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT sea_NN1 is_VBZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
._. ._. "_" Sport_NN1 is_VBZ similar_JJ in_II that_DD1 regard_NN1 ,_, as_II both_DB2 individual_JJ opponents_NN2 and_CC rival_JJ teams_NN2 take_VV0 advantage_NN1 of_IO available_JJ technological_JJ developments_NN2 ,_, looking_VVG for_IF their_APPGE contenders_NN2 '_NULL weak_JJ points_NN2 and_CC devising_VVG unique_JJ defensive_JJ and_CC attacking_VVG tactics_NN2 ,_, all_DB in_II the_AT name_NN1 of_IO winning_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST such_DA increased_JJ IFC/LPFC_NP1 activation_NN1 was_VBDZ also_RR observed_VVN for_IF correct_JJ responses_NN2 in_II fMRI_NN2 studies_NN2 on_II bias_NN1 detection_NN1 during_II logical_JJ and_CC probabilistic_JJ reasoning_NN1 with_IW adults_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, De_NP1 Martino_NP1 ,_, Kumaran_NP1 ,_, Seymour_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Dolan_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; De_NP1 Neys_NN2 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Goel_NP1 &;_NULL Dolan_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Houdé_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2000_MC ;_; Stollstorff_NP1 ,_, Vartanian_JJ ,_, &;_NULL Goel_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequentially_RR ,_, low_JJ income_NN1 categories_NN2 are_VBR hypothesized_VVN to_TO be_VBI less_DAR tax_NN1 compliant_JJ than_CSN high_JJ income_NN1 categories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II this_DD1 perspective_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 first_MD point_NN1 of_IO consideration_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT results_NN2 of_IO our_APPGE power_NN1 analyses_NN2 showed_VVD that_CST our_APPGE tests_NN2 had_VHD an_AT1 average_JJ replication_NN1 power_NN1 of_IO .81_MC ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ generally_RR considered_VVN an_AT1 acceptable_JJ level_NN1 of_IO power_NN1 (_( Cohen_NP1 ,_, 1992_MC )_) ,_, and_CC which_DDQ means_VVZ that_CST one_PN1 would_VM expect_VVI that_CST if_CS the_AT seven_MC effects_NN2 reported_VVN by_II Ophir_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
were_VBDR true_JJ ,_, then_RT at_RR21 least_RR22 five_MC of_IO these_DD2 seven_MC effects_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, 81%_NNU of_IO the_AT seven_MC effects_NN2 tested_VVN )_) would_VM be_VBI replicated_VVN at_II =_FO .05_MC in_II the_AT current_JJ replication_NN1 study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB items_NN2 used_VVD a_AT1 scale_NN1 of_IO very_RG poor_JJ (_( 1_MC1 )_) to_II very_RG good_JJ (_( 5_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT common_JJ rate_NN1 control_NN1 account_NN1 of_IO PM_NP1 has_VHZ more_RGR explanatory_JJ power_NN1 than_CSN alternative_JJ accounts_NN2 which_DDQ emphasise_VV0 the_AT role_NN1 of_IO mental_JJ imagery_NN1 or_CC the_AT oculomotor_NN1 system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT complementarity_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 two_MC approaches_NN2 can_VM enable_VVI researchers_NN2 to_TO potentially_RR identify_VVI through_II more_RGR grounded_JJ qualitative_JJ means_NN the_AT unique_JJ issues_NN2 or_CC challenges_NN2 faced_VVN in_II different_JJ global_JJ virtual_JJ teams_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 how_RRQ teams_NN2 may_VM develop_VVI their_APPGE own_DA ways_NN2 to_TO handle_VVI cultural_JJ diversity_NN1 or_CC challenges_NN2 with_IW virtual_JJ media_NN (_( e.g._REX ,_, von_NP1 Glinow_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, in_II this_DD1 task_NN1 ,_, all_DB the_AT groups_NN2 of_IO struggling_JJ readers_NN2 performed_VVD worse_JJR than_CSN the_AT good_JJ readers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT silent_JJ condition_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX tested_VVN for_IF three_MC reasons_NN2 :_: first_MD ,_, this_DD1 condition_NN1 did_VDD not_XX seem_VVI ecological_JJ for_IF babies_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE parents_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 indicates_VVZ that_CST externalizing_JJ behavior_NN1 has_VHZ a_AT1 tendency_NN1 to_TO escalate_VVI once_RR it_PPH1 develops_VVZ :_: participants_NN2 were_VBDR likely_JJ to_TO either_RR engage_VVI in_II multiple_NN1 externalizing_VVG behaviors_NN2 or_CC engage_VV0 in_RP none_PN ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 by-product_NN1 of_IO the_AT simulation_NN1 study_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR able_JK to_TO assess_VVI the_AT bias_NN1 in_II math_NN1 formula_NN1 as_CSA ,_, β_NULL ,_, the_AT design_NN1 and_CC the_AT error_NN1 distribution_NN1 vary_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, to_TO create_VVI a_AT1 single_JJ measure_NN1 of_IO recall_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 subtracted_VVD distortions/intrusions_NN2 from_II actions/objects_NN2 recalled_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 effects_NN2 may_VM be_VBI stronger_JJR for_IF girls_NN2 than_CSN for_IF boys_NN2 ,_, but_CCB this_DD1 may_VM also_RR be_VBI a_AT1 function_NN1 of_IO developmental_JJ stage_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT communities_NN2 were_VBDR defined_VVN as_CSA Statistical_JJ Local_NN1 Areas_NN2 with_IW at_RR21 least_RR22 17,000_MC residents_NN2 ,_, based_VVN on_II the_AT Australian_JJ Bureau_NN1 of_IO Statistics_NN census_NN1 boundaries_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 expected_JJ improvement_NN1 in_II the_AT training_NN1 tasks_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 were_VBDR interested_JJ in_II the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO the_AT training_NN1 on_II tasks_NN2 involving_VVG similar_JJ processes_NN2 but_CCB sharing_VVG few_DA2 surface_NN1 features_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS the_AT current_JJ research_NN1 reveals_VVZ important_JJ limitations_NN2 that_CST might_VM preclude_VVI more_RGR definitive_JJ statements_NN2 ,_, the_AT study_NN1 does_VDZ remind_VVI us_PPIO2 of_IO the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO race_NN1 and_CC suggests_VVZ that_CST racial_JJ group_NN1 membership_NN1 may_VM indeed_RR impact_NN1 graduate_NN1 students_NN2 '_NULL experiences_NN2 in_II multicultural_JJ courses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS teachers_NN2 and_CC students_NN2 co-create_VV0 positive_JJ or_CC negative_JJ climates_NN2 for_IF learning_NN1 ,_, emotions_NN2 can_VM be_VBI seen_VVN as_CSA shared_VVN and_CC as_RG generative_JJ factors_NN2 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 motivational_JJ learning_NN1 processes_NN2 (_( Meyer_NP1 &;_NULL Turner_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Safety_NN1 appeared_VVD to_TO be_VBI an_AT1 important_JJ factor_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 students_NN2 of_IO Color_NN1 and_CC White_JJ students_NN2 in_II multicultural_JJ courses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT skin_NN1 of_IO the_AT forearm_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, in_II one_MC1 sense_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 flat_JJ 2-dimensional_JJ (_( 2D_NNU )_) sheet_NN1 ,_, but_CCB in_II another_DD1 sense_NN1 approximately_RR cylindrical_JJ ,_, mirroring_VVG the_AT 3-dimensional_JJ (_( 3D_NNU )_) volumetric_JJ shape_NN1 of_IO the_AT arm_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Parents_NN2 reported_VVD their_APPGE own_DA education_NN1 from_II six_MC predefined_JJ categories_NN2 (_( eighth_MD grade_NN1 or_CC less_RRR ,_, some_DD high_JJ school_NN1 ,_, GED_NP1 ,_, high_JJ school_NN1 diploma_NN1 ,_, some_DD college_NN1 ,_, and_CC college_NN1 degree_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 is_VBZ Bonnie_NP1 Miller-McLemore_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1994_MC )_) pastoral_JJ theological_JJ analysis_NN1 of_IO women_NN2 and_CC work_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 then_RT examined_VVD the_AT same_DA correlations_NN2 for_IF the_AT three_MC age_NN1 groups_NN2 separately_RR ;_; again_RT ,_, none_PN were_VBDR significant_JJ (_( |_NULL r_ZZ1 |_NULL range_NN1 :_: .00-.28_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Noteworthy_JJ ,_, even_CS21 when_CS22 rituals_NN2 are_VBR justified_VVN by_II mythological_JJ "_" explanations_NN2 "_" ,_, they_PPHS2 are_VBR inherently_RR compelling_JJ ,_, i.e._REX with_IW a_AT1 compulsory_JJ character_NN1 (_( Rappaport_NP1 ,_, 1979_MC ;_; Tambiah_NP1 ,_, 1985_MC ;_; Dulaney_NP1 and_CC Fiske_NP1 ,_, 1994_MC ;_; Boyer_NP1 and_CC Lyenard_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS the_AT AD/HD_NN1 symptoms_NN2 were_VBDR reduced_VVN after_II training_NN1 ,_, and_CC there_EX were_VBDR clear_JJ changes_NN2 in_II EEG_NP1 characteristics_NN2 ,_, these_DD2 were_VBDR not_XX accompanied_VVN by_II a_AT1 systematic_JJ change_NN1 in_II cognitive_JJ processing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT waiting_NN1 itself_PPX1 is_VBZ pleasurable_JJ ,_, and_CC so_RR people_NN get_VV0 a_AT1 greater_JJR hedonic_JJ benefit_NN1 from_II their_APPGE experiences_NN2 when_CS they_PPHS2 delay_VV0 consumption_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Town_NN1 of_IO Newtown_NP1 distributed_VVD some_DD of_IO these_DD2 public_JJ and_CC private_JJ resources_NN2 ,_, and_CC other_JJ resources_NN2 went_VVD directly_RR to_II local_JJ community_NN1 organizations_NN2 ,_, the_AT school_NN1 district_NN1 ,_, and_CC local_JJ mental_JJ health_NN1 service_NN1 providers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Independent_JJ samples_NN2 t_ZZ1 tests_NN2 indicated_VVD that_CST there_EX was_VBDZ no_AT significant_JJ difference_NN1 in_II mean_JJ duration_NN1 between_II round_JJ nonword_NN1 recordings_NN2 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 698.35_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 125.02_MC )_) and_CC sharp_JJ nonword_NN1 recordings_NN2 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 747.86_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 136.02_MC )_) ,_, t(30)_FO =_FO 1.07_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .29_MC ;_; there_EX was_VBDZ also_RR no_AT significant_JJ difference_NN1 in_II mean_JJ maximum_JJ pitch_NN1 between_II round_JJ nonword_NN1 recordings_NN2 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 117.11_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 9.92_MC )_) and_CC sharp_JJ nonword_NN1 recordings_NN2 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 113.87_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 7.01_MC )_) ,_, t(30)_FO =_FO 1.07_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .29_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Latent_JJ growth_NN1 curve_NN1 modeling_NN1 (_( LGM_NP1 )_) (_( Duncan_NP1 ,_, Duncan_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Strycker_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Wang_NP1 &;_NULL Wang_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) and_CC Latent_JJ Change_NN1 Score_NN1 (_( LCS_NP1 )_) analyses_NN2 (_( Ferrer_NP1 &;_NULL McArdle_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; McArdle_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) were_VBDR used_VVN to_TO test_VVI the_AT hypotheses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS the_AT current_JJ results_NN2 show_VV0 that_CST children_NN2 reorganized_VVD the_AT interleaved_JJ demonstration_NN1 ,_, and_CC this_DD1 suggests_VVZ ,_, that_CST a_AT1 goal_NN1 organization_NN1 is_VBZ prioritized_VVN ,_, this_DD1 does_VDZ not_XX mean_VVI that_DD1 veridical_JJ temporal_JJ order_NN1 is_VBZ completely_RR unrecoverable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ also_RR consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT model_NN1 of_IO Rastle_NP1 and_CC Coltheart_NP1 (_( 2000_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ based_VVN on_II the_AT identification_NN1 of_IO specific_JJ prefixes_NN2 and_CC suffixes_NN2 in_II English_NN1 that_CST are_VBR associated_VVN with_IW stress_NN1 patterns_NN2 via_II hard-coded_JJ rules_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 questions_NN2 consisted_VVN of_IO filler_NN1 questions_NN2 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 four_MC questions_NN2 designed_VVN to_TO elicit_VVI cognitions_NN2 relevant_JJ to_II the_AT four_MC primary_JJ domains_NN2 of_IO PsyCap_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 focused_VVD solely_RR on_II auditory_JJ hallucinations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reading_NP1 and_CC writing_VVG abilities_NN2 were_VBDR not_XX taken_VVN into_II account_NN1 for_IF the_AT analyses_NN2 of_IO language_NN1 disturbances_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF individuals_NN2 without_IW sexual_JJ infidelity_NN1 ,_, only_RR greater_JJR commitment_NN1 was_VBDZ associated_VVN with_IW perceptions_NN2 of_IO ambiguous_JJ (_( p_ZZ1 =_FO .019_MC )_) ,_, explicit_JJ (_( p_ZZ1 =_FO .001_MC )_) ,_, and_CC deceptive_JJ behaviors_NN2 (_( p_ZZ1 =_FO .001_MC )_) as_RG more_RGR indicative_JJ of_IO infidelity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT largest_JJT AUC_NN1 was_VBDZ obtained_VVN for_IF the_AT weighted_JJ CRI_NN2 which_DDQ has_VHZ the_AT longest_JJT scale_NN1 range_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT MPT_NP1 model_NN1 incorporating_VVG these_DD2 processes_NN2 is_VBZ specified_VVN in_II Figure_NN1 6_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Initial_JJ evidence_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST although_CS cross-group_JJ contact_NN1 increases_VVZ a_AT1 social_JJ mobility_NN1 mindset_NN1 among_II members_NN2 of_IO low_JJ status_NN1 groups_NN2 ,_, this_DD1 individual_JJ mobility_NN1 orientation_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX lead_VVI to_II decreased_JJ interest_NN1 in_II protest_NN1 (_( Tausch_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II comparing_VVG the_AT results_NN2 obtained_VVN from_II the_AT two_MC modelling_JJ specifications_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD that_CST neglecting_VVG a_AT1 non-random_JJ selection_NN1 of_IO observations_NN2 can_VM lead_VVI to_II biased_JJ estimates_NN2 of_IO the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO the_AT determinants_NN2 on_II outcome_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Emotion_NN1 labeling_VVG :_: This_DD1 categorical_JJ variable_NN1 indicated_VVD whether_CSW31 or_CSW32 not_CSW33 the_AT toddler_NN1 labeled_VVD the_AT baby_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 emotional_JJ state_NN1 (_( saying_VVG things_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 "_" Baby_NN1 is_VBZ sad_JJ "_" and_CC "_" Baby_NN1 is_VBZ hungry_JJ "_" )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT correlations_NN2 showed_VVD overlap_NN1 but_CCB not_XX redundancy_NN1 and_CC also_RR highlighted_VVN connections_NN2 between_II father_NN1 play_NN1 behaviour_NN1 and_CC child_NN1 behaviours_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sensitivity_NN1 coding_NN1 ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, typically_RR involves_VVZ a_AT1 more_RGR global_JJ judgement_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 multi-faceted_JJ construct_VV0 that_CST includes_VVZ behaviors_NN2 ,_, tone_NN1 of_IO voice_NN1 ,_, facial_JJ expressions_NN2 ,_, movements_NN2 ,_, and_CC non-verbal_JJ and_CC verbal_JJ vocalizations_NN2 (_( Mesman_NP1 &;_NULL Emmen_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Thompson_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_CS each_DD1 interview_NN1 the_AT interviewer_NN1 had_VHD to_TO fill_VVI out_RP a_AT1 protocol_NN1 describing_VVG her_APPGE feelings_NN2 and_CC impressions_NN2 during_II the_AT interviews_NN2 ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 counter-transference_NN1 manifestations_NN2 could_VM be_VBI considered_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT importance_NN1 of_IO effort_NN1 did_VDD not_XX fade_VVI away_RL during_II the_AT Cultural_JJ Revolution_NN1 ;_; learning_VVG virtues_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 effort_NN1 ,_, perseverance_NN1 ,_, concentration_NN1 and_CC endurance_NN1 of_IO hardship_NN1 even_RR today_RT constitute_VV0 solid_JJ basis_NN1 for_IF the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO learning_VVG in_II China_NP1 (_( Li_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, examination_NN1 of_IO the_AT prospective_JJ data_NN demonstrated_VVD that_CST neither_RR trauma_NN1 exposure_NN1 nor_CC the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO PTSD_NP1 significantly_RR predicted_VVD the_AT onset_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 AUD_NN1 in_II women_NN2 (_( Breslau_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, less_RGR secure_JJ people_NN tended_VVD to_TO react_VVI to_TO stress_VVI with_IW increased_JJ amygdala_NN1 activity_NN1 a_AT1 neural_JJ indication_NN1 of_IO distress-related_JJ arousal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 implies_VVZ psychic_JJ work_NN1 while_CS creating_VVG an_AT1 image_NN1 where_CS there_EX was_VBDZ nothing_PN1 before_RT ,_, or_CC existed_VVD only_RR as_II an_AT1 impression_NN1 without_IW form_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 invisible_JJ boundary_NN1 was_VBDZ placed_VVN inside_II the_AT sentence_NN1 ,_, when_CS the_AT readers_NN2 '_NULL eyes_NN2 crossed_VVD the_AT boundary_NN1 ,_, the_AT target_NN1 word_NN1 to_II the_AT left_NN1 of_IO the_AT boundary_NN1 was_VBDZ replaced_VVN with_IW a_AT1 parafoveal_JJ "_" postview_NN1 "_" stimulus_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ was_VBDZ either_RR related_VVN or_CC unrelated_JJ to_II the_AT target_NN1 word_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Post-event_JJ rumination_NN1 is_VBZ conceptualised_VVN as_CSA repetitive_JJ ,_, negative-laden_JJ thoughts_NN2 related_VVN to_II perceived_JJ inadequacies_NN2 of_IO the_AT self_NN1 (_( Clark_NP1 Wells_NP1 ,_, 1995_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 foci_NN2 are_VBR equally_RR interesting_JJ and_CC valid_JJ enterprises_NN2 ,_, but_CCB speak_VV0 to_II distinct_JJ (_( but_CCB related_JJ )_) phenomena_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT time_NNT1 this_DD1 article_NN1 is_VBZ submitted_VVN for_IF publication_NN1 ,_, Trump_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN in_II the_AT White_NP1 House_NN1 for_IF seven_MC months_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE key_JJ health_NN1 variables_NN2 were_VBDR measured_VVN at_II baseline_NN1 and_CC have_VH0 almost_RR no_AT missing_JJ data_NN ,_, and_CC the_AT ultimate_JJ reincarceration_NN1 variable_NN1 measured_VVN at_II 15_MC months_NNT2 contains_VVZ no_AT missing_JJ data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Depression_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI seen_VVN ,_, counted_VVD ,_, or_CC measured_VVN with_IW a_AT1 ruler_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, some_DD of_IO these_DD2 fillers_NN2 were_VBDR less_RGR complex_JJ stories_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ might_VM have_VHI influenced_VVN scores_NN2 for_IF the_AT experimental_JJ items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Future_JJ research_NN1 could_VM assess_VVI participants_NN2 '_NULL total_JJ exercise_NN1 levels_NN2 before_RT ,_, during_II ,_, and_CC following_VVG the_AT intervention_NN1 ,_, via_II a_AT1 daily_JJ diary_NN1 for_REX21 example_REX22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Step-up_JJ hierarchical_JJ regressions_NN2 showed_VVD that_CST adding_VVG quadratic_JJ and_CC cubic_JJ time_NNT1 variables_NN2 resulted_VVN in_II models_NN2 that_CST were_VBDR statistically_RR significantly_RR better_RRR than_CSN linear_JJ models_NN2 (_( analyses_VVZ not_XX shown_VVN )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS an_AT1 observer_NN1 views_VVZ someone_PN1 shifting_VVG to_II a_AT1 new_JJ goal_NN1 ,_, and_CC then_RT returning_VVG to_II the_AT first_MD goal_NN1 ,_, mirror_NN1 neurons_NN2 and_CC motor_NN1 resonance_NN1 can_VM not_XX help_VVI to_II the_AT observer_NN1 bind_VV0 subgoals_NN2 together_RL across_II the_AT temporal_JJ gap_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, our_APPGE results_NN2 suggest_VV0 additive_JJ benefits_NN2 pertaining_II21 to_II22 the_AT quantity_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 relationships_NN2 such_CS21 that_CS22 students_NN2 who_PNQS retain_VV0 a_AT1 greater_JJR number_NN1 of_IO natural_JJ mentors_NN2 appear_VV0 to_TO reap_VVI greater_JJR benefits_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
High_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO trait_NN1 anxiety_NN1 ,_, social_JJ anxiety_NN1 ,_, and_CC dysphoria_NN1 are_VBR associated_VVN with_IW a_AT1 loss_NN1 of_IO mnemic_JJ neglect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
SPSS_NP1 22.0_MC (_( New_NP1 York_NP1 ,_, NY_NP1 )_) was_VBDZ used_VVN to_TO apply_VVI the_AT Hayes_NP1 process_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Patients_NN2 with_IW complex_JJ partial_JJ seizures_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, may_VM exhibit_VVI movements_NN2 that_CST appear_VV0 sufficiently_RR voluntary_JJ to_TO confuse_VVI even_RR experienced_JJ neurologists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 section_NN1 goes_VVZ beyond_II those_DD2 analyses_NN2 to_TO examine_VVI the_AT costs_NN2 and_CC benefits_NN2 of_IO specific_JJ teaching_NN1 types_NN2 ,_, and_CC to_TO consider_VVI two_MC cooperative_JJ problems_NN2 that_CST may_VM act_VVI as_CSA barriers_NN2 to_II the_AT evolution_NN1 of_IO teaching_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Knowledge_NN1 about_II the_AT causal_JJ change_NN1 is_VBZ used_VVN to_TO build_VVI a_AT1 representation_NN1 about_II the_AT temporal_JJ progress_NN1 of_IO the_AT event_NN1 (_( cf._VV0 There_EX was_VBDZ no_AT improvement_NN1 in_II the_AT comprehension_NN1 of_IO new_JJ words_NN2 for_IF either_DD1 group_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hormonal_JJ imbalances_NN2 significantly_RR contribute_VV0 to_II mood_NN1 fluctuations_NN2 in_II BD_NP1 (_( Frey_NP1 and_CC Dias_FW ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 turn_VV0 next_II21 to_II22 the_AT issue_NN1 of_IO executive_NN1 control_NN1 processes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT sequence_NN1 that_CST follows_VVZ reflects_VVZ a_AT1 scaffolding_NN1 approach_NN1 to_II teaching_VVG where_RRQ knowledge_NN1 and_CC understanding_NN1 are_VBR seen_VVN to_TO build_VVI on_II prior_JJ learning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ai_NN1 Koyanagi_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 work_NN1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN by_II the_AT Miguel_NP1 Servet_NP1 contract_NN1 financed_VVN by_II the_AT CP13/00150_FU and_CC PI15/00862_FU projects_NN2 ,_, integrated_VVN into_II the_AT National_JJ R+D+I_FO and_CC funded_VVN by_II the_AT ISCIII_NN1 -_- General_JJ Branch_NN1 Evaluation_NN1 and_CC Promotion_NN1 of_IO Health_NN1 Research_NN1 -_- and_CC the_AT European_JJ Regional_JJ Development_NN1 Fund_NN1 (_( ERDF-FEDER_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS survey_NN1 participants_NN2 were_VBDR randomly_RR selected_VVN into_II the_AT sample_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 self-selected_JJ into_II or_CC out_II21 of_II22 treatment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO assess_VVI translational_JJ validity_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE rodent_NN1 model_NN1 of_IO scarcity-adversity_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 considered_VVD our_APPGE rodent_NN1 results_NN2 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 a_AT1 longitudinal_JJ study_NN1 of_IO human_JJ children_NN2 and_CC families_NN2 followed_VVN from_II birth_NN1 in_II predominantly_RR low-income_JJ and_CC nonurban_JJ communities_NN2 in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 (_( Vernon-Feagans_NN2 &;_NULL Cox_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT final_JJ representation_NN1 of_IO madness_NN1 I_PPIS1 wish_VV0 to_TO consider_VVI is_VBZ folly_NN1 ,_, often_RR depicted_VVN in_II literature_NN1 as_II the_AT wise_JJ fool_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 calculated_VVD the_AT ORs_NP2 for_IF overall_JJ psychotic_JJ experiences_NN2 and_CC each_DD1 specific_JJ psychotic_JJ experience_NN1 (_( auditory_JJ hallucinations_NN2 ,_, visual_JJ hallucinations_NN2 ,_, persecutory_JJ thoughts_NN2 ,_, and_CC thought_NN1 broadcasting_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT person_NN1 is_VBZ in_II the_AT focus_NN1 of_IO attention_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT present_JJ studies_NN2 ,_, participants_NN2 were_VBDR shown_VVN a_AT1 series_NN of_IO 4-word_JJ sets_NN2 and_CC instructed_VVD to_TO choose_VVI the_AT one_MC1 word_NN1 they_PPHS2 may_VM have_VHI encountered_VVN in_II the_AT first_MD (_( encoding_VVG )_) phase_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO assess_VVI the_AT fit_NN1 of_IO the_AT modelimplied_JJ correlation_NN1 pattern_NN1 ,_, the_AT cosine_NN1 function_NN1 model_NN1 (_( CFM_NP1 ;_; Nagy_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) was_VBDZ fitted_VVN to_II the_AT data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 asked_VVD how_RRQ readers_NN2 use_VV0 sentence_NN1 contexts_NN2 of_IO differing_JJ predictive_JJ strengths_NN2 to_TO prepare_VVI for_IF upcoming_JJ words_NN2 before_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR presented_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
You_PPY should_VM realize_VVI that_DD1 money_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI earned_VVN while_CS you_PPY are_VBR on_II a_AT1 break_NN1 ;_; therefore_RR it_PPH1 is_VBZ in_II your_APPGE best_JJT interests_NN2 to_TO take_VVI few_DA2 ,_, if_CS any_DD ,_, breaks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
He_PPHS1 then_RT compassionately_RR said_VVD ,_, "_" I_PPIS1 knew_VVD something_PN1 was_VBDZ wrong_JJ ,_, but_CCB just_RR didn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 know_VV0 what_DDQ it_PPH1 was_VBDZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
People_NN are_VBR slower_JJR and/or_CC more_DAR error_NN1 prone_JJ when_CS matching_VVG a_AT1 probe_NN1 word_NN1 (_( spoken_VVN or_CC written_VVN ,_, e.g._REX ,_, cat_NN1 )_) to_II its_APPGE corresponding_JJ target_NN1 picture_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, CAT_NN1 )_) in_II the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO semantically_RR related_VVN (_( e.g._REX ,_, MONKEY_NN1 ,_, RABBIT_NN1 ,_, DOG_NN1 )_) versus_II unrelated_JJ distractor_NN1 pictures_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, TABLE_NN1 ,_, BOAT_NN1 ,_, APPLE_NN1 ;_; Biegler_NP1 ,_, Crowther_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Martin_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Campanella_NP1 &;_NULL Shallice_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Jefferies_NP1 ,_, Baker_NP1 ,_, Doran_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Ralph_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Warrington_NP1 &;_NULL Cipolotti_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT empirical_JJ estimates_NN2 for_IF the_AT main-effects_NN2 model_NN1 are_VBR shown_VVN in_II Table_NN1 2_MC ,_, along_II21 with_II22 the_AT direct_JJ and_CC indirect_JJ effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT institutional_JJ review_NN1 board_NN1 evaluated_VVD this_DD1 project_NN1 and_CC deemed_VVN it_PPH1 a_AT1 quality_NN1 improvement_NN1 effort_NN1 because_II21 of_II22 its_APPGE strong_JJ focus_NN1 on_II local_JJ assessment_NN1 to_TO improve_VVI service_NN1 quality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS designing_VVG this_DD1 study_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 made_VVD a_AT1 deliberate_JJ attempt_NN1 to_TO gather_VVI a_AT1 representative_JJ sample_NN1 of_IO adolescents_NN2 with_IW GAD_NP1 ,_, and_CC thus_RR we_PPIS2 anticipated_VVD that_CST a_AT1 significant_JJ portion_NN1 would_VM be_VBI treated_VVN with_IW medication_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rotations_NN2 were_VBDR counterbalanced_VVN across_II targets_NN2 so_CS21 that_CS22 each_DD1 of_IO three_MC target_NN1 categoriesin_NN1 the_AT middle_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE reflections_NN2 ,_, on_II minor_JJ axes_NN2 and_CC its_APPGE reflections_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT remaining_JJ cornerswere_NN1 sampled_VVN at_II less_DAR than_CSN 90_MC degrees_NN2 half_DB of_IO the_AT time_NNT1 and_CC at_II more_DAR than_CSN 90_MC degrees_NN2 half_DB of_IO the_AT time_NNT1 within_II each_DD1 block_NN1 and_CC so_CS21 that_CS22 rotations_NN2 were_VBDR used_VVN evenly_RR but_CCB otherwise_RR random_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT attainment_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 short-term_JJ political_JJ goal_NN1 might_VM then_RT increase_VVI the_AT likelihood_NN1 of_IO achieving_VVG the_AT ultimately_RR desired_VVN goal_NN1 of_IO uniting_JJ Muslims_NN2 under_II a_AT1 pan-Islamic_JJ state_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_VV0 1_MC1 presents_VVZ the_AT results_NN2 of_IO structural_JJ equation_NN1 modeling_VVG with_IW latent_JJ variables_NN2 using_VVG AMOS_NN2 21.0_MC (_( Arbuckle_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) with_IW maximum_JJ likelihood_NN1 estimation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Treatment_NN1 of_IO SAM_NP1 cases_NN2 in_II control_NN1 group_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Conventional_JJ milk_NN1 consumption_NN1 studies_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO approach_VVI milk_NN1 as_II a_AT1 homogenous_JJ product_NN1 in_II which_DDQ different_JJ types_NN2 of_IO milk_NN1 products_NN2 are_VBR lumped_VVN together_RL (_( see_VV0 Deaton_NP1 and_CC Muellbauer_NP1 ,_, 1980_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Evidence_NN1 of_IO shared_JJ mechanisms_NN2 across_II EVAs_NP2 would_VM be_VBI shown_VVN by_II significant_JJ between-category_NN1 priming_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, our_APPGE focus_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO better_RRR understand_VVI the_AT validity_NN1 of_IO the_AT CCCI-R_NP1 and_CC to_TO determine_VVI which_DDQ of_IO its_APPGE items_NN2 can_VM be_VBI used_VVN effectively_RR in_II a_AT1 client-rated_JJ capacity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 assumption_NN1 is_VBZ called_VVN the_AT conditional_JJ independence_NN1 assumption_NN1 (_( CIA_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT presence_NN1 of_IO structural_JJ priming_NN1 in_II our_APPGE experiment_NN1 has_VHZ implications_NN2 for_IF artificial_JJ language_NN1 learning_NN1 ,_, and_CC may_VM also_RR speak_VVI to_II questions_NN2 which_DDQ have_VH0 been_VBN of_IO interest_NN1 in_II the_AT priming_NN1 literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Especially_RR in_II the_AT early_JJ stages_NN2 of_IO life_NN1 (_( e.g._REX childhood_NN1 and_CC adolescence_NN1 )_) ,_, genetics_NN1 are_VBR particularly_RR prominent_JJ ,_, whereas_CS environmental_JJ aspects_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN shown_VVN to_TO become_VVI more_RGR important_JJ thereafter_RT (_( e.g._REX Bleidorn_NP1 ,_, Kandler_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Caspi_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Briley_NP1 &;_NULL TuckerDrob_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 suggests_VVZ that_CST mere_JJ surface_NN1 distance_NN1 between_II verb_NN1 and_CC particle_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX influence_VVI gestural_JJ content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 endings_NN2 were_VBDR formed_VVN by_II changing_VVG one_MC1 letter_NN1 of_IO the_AT morphological_JJ suffixes_NN2 used_VVN in_II the_AT pseudomorphemic_JJ condition_NN1 ;_; thus_RR ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 high_JJ level_NN1 of_IO orthographic_JJ similarity_NN1 between_II the_AT paired_JJ items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Under_II the_AT traditional_JJ analysis_NN1 ,_, the_AT prevalence_NN1 of_IO "_" overall_JJ similarity_NN1 "_" (_( BC_RA )_) responding_VVG increases_NN2 as_CSA presentation_NN1 time_NNT1 decreases_VVZ from_II 7500_MC ms_NN1 to_II 1024_MC ms_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 session_NNT1 lasted_VVD approximately_RR 20_MC min_NNU to_II 30_MC min_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interestingly_RR ,_, patients_NN2 with_IW major_JJ depression_NN1 or_CC schizophrenia_NN1 showed_VVD relative_JJ peaks_NN2 in_II the_AT neuropsychological_JJ symptoms_NN2 subscale_NN1 ,_, and_CC depressed_JJ patients_NN2 generally_RR rated_VVD the_AT severity_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE few_DA2 symptoms_NN2 disproportionally_RR high_RR compared_VVN to_II their_APPGE scores_NN2 on_II the_AT other_JJ subscales_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 examined_VVD racial/ethnic_JJ disparities_NN2 in_II school-based_JJ behavioral_JJ health_NN1 service_NN1 use_NN1 for_IF children_NN2 with_IW psychiatric_JJ disorders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Elias_NP1 '_NULL turn_NN1 to_II sociology_NN1 in_II the_AT Heidelberg_NP1 of_IO the_AT early_JJ 1930s_MC2 ,_, then_RT the_AT center_NN1 of_IO German_JJ sociology_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 multicultural_JJ academic_JJ microcosm_NN1 (_( Treiber_NP1 &;_NULL Sauerland_NP1 ,_, 1995_MC )_) ,_, has_VHZ much_DA1 to_TO do_VDI with_IW his_APPGE wish_NN1 to_TO find_VVI a_AT1 way_NN1 out_II21 of_II22 this_DD1 philosophical_JJ conundrum_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II the_AT most-likely_JJ heuristic_JJ focuses_VVZ exclusively_RR on_II these_DD2 outcomes_NN2 ,_, its_APPGE choices_NN2 in_II such_DA an_AT1 environment_NN1 are_VBR comparable_JJ to_II those_DD2 of_IO minimax_NN1 for_IF gains_NN2 and_CC maximax_VV0 for_IF losses_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ have_VH0 a_AT1 low_JJ probability_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, organisations_NN2 should_VM be_VBI careful_JJ not_XX to_TO emphasise_VVI the_AT competitive_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE selection_NN1 process_NN1 when_CS providing_VVG information_NN1 to_II applicants_NN2 during_II or_CC before_CS the_AT interview_NN1 or_CC test_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Beyond_II these_DD2 general_JJ guidelines_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 established_VVD more_RGR finegrained_JJ inclusion_NN1 criteria_NN2 for_IF each_DD1 variable_NN1 in_II this_DD1 metaanalysis_NN1 ,_, as_CSA explained_VVN below_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT give_VV0 treatment_NN1 70%_NNU of_IO dictators_NN2 give_VV0 positive_JJ amounts_NN2 but_CCB this_DD1 figure_NN1 is_VBZ significantly_RR lower_JJR at_II 47%_NNU in_II the_AT give/take_VV0 treatment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, such_DA "_" insider_NN1 "_" histories_NN2 are_VBR often_RR celebratory_JJ narratives_NN2 attempting_VVG to_TO explain_VVI the_AT "_" origin_NN1 "_" of_IO Rorschach_NN1 networks_NN2 in_II particular_JJ locations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 include_VV0 variations_NN2 in_II research_NN1 design_NN1 ,_, recruitment_NN1 and_CC sampling_VVG strategies_NN2 (_( Baines_NP1 ,_, Powers_NP1 ,_, and_CC Brown_NP1 2007_MC ;_; Matta_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2018_MC ;_; Michalak_NP1 ,_, Zhang_NP1 ,_, and_CC Jacobi_NP1 2012_MC )_) ,_, the_AT disparity_NN1 between_II self-reported_NN1 and_CC actual_JJ dietary_JJ intake_NN1 (_( Archer_NP1 ,_, Marlow_NP1 ,_, and_CC Lavie_NP1 2018d_NNU ;_; Archer_NP1 ,_, Pavela_NP1 ,_, and_CC Lavie_NP1 2015_MC )_) ,_, the_AT lack_NN1 of_IO validity_NN1 of_IO assessment_NN1 protocols_NN2 or_CC metrics_NN2 employed_VVN for_IF exposures_NN2 and_CC outcomes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, diagnosed_VVD conditions_NN2 vs._II subjective_JJ perceptions_NN2 )_) ,_, and_CC lack_NN1 of_IO understanding_NN1 and_CC control_VV0 for_IF confounding_VVG variables_NN2 and/or_CC effect_NN1 modifiers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II some_DD cases_NN2 ,_, the_AT consumer_NN1 may_VM wish_VVI to_TO suppress_VVI an_AT1 undesired_JJ former_DA identity_NN1 (_( Ashforth_NP1 ,_, Harrison_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Corley_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 proposed_VVD that_CST the_AT key_NN1 to_II treatment_NN1 was_VBDZ emotional_JJ abreaction_NN1 ,_, or_CC catharsis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT type_NN1 and_CC frequency_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 services_NN2 varied_VVN across_II participants_NN2 and_CC fluctuated_VVN throughout_II the_AT period_NN1 of_IO EIBI_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA discussed_VVN earlier_RRR ,_, a_AT1 second_MD key_JJ source_NN1 of_IO slowness_NN1 in_II standard_JJ deep_JJ RL_NP1 ,_, alongside_II incremental_JJ updating_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ weak_JJ inductive_JJ bias_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
See_VV0 Simons_NP et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2014_MC )_) for_IF additional_JJ detail_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR 1.6%_FO had_VHD installed_VVN PV_NN1 devices_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 see_VV0 the_AT acquisition_NN1 of_IO League-Stepping_JJ Methods_NN2 as_CSA largely_RR compatible_JJ with_IW past_JJ and_CC current_JJ work_NN1 on_II skill_NN1 acquisition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Bayes_NP1 Factors_NN2 provided_VVD equivocal_JJ evidence_NN1 for_IF the_AT expected_JJ inhibitory_JJ complexity_NN1 effect_NN1 for_IF low-frequency_JJ words_NN2 ,_, BF_NP1 =_FO 0.4_MC (_( +-1.1%_FO )_) ,_, and_CC weak_JJ evidence_NN1 for_IF the_AT unexpected_JJ facilitatory_JJ complexity_NN1 effect_NN1 for_IF high-frequency_JJ words_NN2 ,_, BF_NP1 =_FO 4.9_MC (_( +-0.9%_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR it_PPH1 seems_VVZ that_DD1 contempt_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ often_RR associated_VVN with_IW dehumanization_NN1 and_CC moral_JJ exclusion_NN1 of_IO the_AT object_NN1 of_IO contempt_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 lack_NN1 of_IO reconciliatory_JJ intentions_NN2 ,_, contributes_VVZ particularly_RR toward_II more_RGR extreme_JJ collective_JJ action_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Friedman_NP1 (_( 2003_MC ,_, 2005_MC )_) studied_VVD children_NN2 of_IO up_RG21 to_RG22 3.5_MC years_NNT2 old_JJ and_CC found_VVD them_PPHO2 able_JK to_TO detect_VVI the_AT anomaly_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 reverse_JJ event_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, a_AT1 broken_JJ cookie_NN1 being_VBG joined_VVN to_TO form_VVI a_AT1 whole_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
P6f_FO :_: I_PPIS1 am_VBM beginning_VVG to_TO really_RR appreciate_VVI myself_PPX1 and_CC am_VBM realizing_VVG that_CST I_PPIS1 deserve_VV0 to_TO feel_VVI good_JJ inside_NN1 and_CC to_TO do_VDI nice_JJ things_NN2 for_IF myself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 find_VV0 a_AT1 positive_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II transformational_JJ leaders_NN2 and_CC voice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Parents_NN2 '_NULL responses_NN2 to_II this_DD1 question_NN1 comprised_VVD the_AT computer_NN1 prior_JJ exposure_NN1 variable_NN1 ranging_VVG from_II 0_MC to_II 4_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT ERP_NN1 recognition_NN1 effects_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, Old/New_JJ collapsed_VVN across_II clear_JJ and_CC blurry_JJ conditions_NN2 )_) are_VBR presented_VVN in_II Fig.2_FO (_( left-side_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 are_VBR best_RRT characterized_VVN as_II a_AT1 mutually_RR galvanizing_VVG feedback-loop_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
School_NN1 engagement_NN1 was_VBDZ measured_VVN using_VVG the_AT School_NN1 Engagement_NN1 Measure_NN1 (_( SEM_NP1 ;_; Fredricks_NP2 ,_, Blumenfeld_NP1 ,_, Friedel_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Paris_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_RR patient_JJ and_CC healthy_JJ participant_NN1 groups_NN2 showed_VVD significant_JJ disruption_NN1 of_IO delayed_JJ verbal_JJ recall_NN1 and_CC recognition_NN1 by_II urban_JJ and_CC social_JJ noise_NN1 ,_, and_CC of_IO working_VVG memory_NN1 by_II social_JJ noise_NN1 ,_, relative_II21 to_II22 the_AT quiet_JJ condition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, richer_JJR inflectional_JJ morphology_NN1 in_II German_NN1 compared_VVN to_II English_NN1 may_VM obscure_VVI quantifier-number_JJ similarities_NN2 :_: Whereas_CS numbers_NN2 require_VV0 no_AT case_NN1 marking_VVG in_II German_NN1 (_( for_REX21 instance_REX22 there_EX is_VBZ no_AT difference_NN1 between_II nominative_NN1 and_CC dative_JJ forms_NN2 :_: zwei_NN2 Jungen_NP1 (_( nominative_NN1 )_) '_NULL Two_MC boys_NN2 '_NULL vs._II zwei_NN2 Jungen_NP1 (_( dative_NN1 )_) '_NULL Two_MC boys_NN2 '_NULL )_) ,_, quantifiers_NN2 carry_VV0 inflectional_JJ morphology_NN1 (_( e.g._REX viele_NN1 Jungen_NN1 (_( nominative_NN1 )_) '_NULL many_DA2 boys_NN2 '_NULL vs._II vielen_JJ Jungen_NN1 (_( dative_NN1 )_) '_NULL many(dat)_VV0 boys_NN2 '_NULL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perhaps_RR some_DD subjects_NN2 suffer_VV0 from_II recurrent_JJ spontaneous_JJ mental_JJ imagery_NN1 prior_II21 to_II22 any_DD weight_NN1 loss_NN1 ,_, with_IW these_DD2 experiences_NN2 playing_VVG a_AT1 relatively_RR early_RR causal_JJ role_NN1 regarding_II belief_NN1 content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_CS the_AT interview_NN1 ,_, children_NN2 were_VBDR thoroughly_RR debriefed_VVN and_CC errors_NN2 were_VBDR corrected_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW a_AT1 few_DA2 exceptions_NN2 ,_, individuals_NN2 who_PNQS only_RR participated_VVD at_II baseline_NN1 did_VDD not_XX differ_VVI from_II individuals_NN2 who_PNQS participated_VVD at_II follow-up_NN1 on_II Big_JJ Five_MC personality_NN1 traits_NN2 ,_, emotion_NN1 regulation_NN1 strategies_NN2 ,_, positive_JJ interpersonal_JJ behaviour_NN1 or_CC relationship_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 after_II the_AT conflict_NN1 discussion_NN1 (_( p_ZZ1 >_FO .10_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_RR firsttime_NNT1 and_CC returning_VVG readers_NN2 of_IO James_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Principles_NN2 will_VM find_VVI plenty_PN of_IO worthwhile_JJ material_NN1 in_II this_DD1 book_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ especially_RR important_JJ for_IF us_PPIO2 to_TO be_VBI able_JK to_TO more_RRR thoroughly_RR understand_VVI how_RGQ global_JJ virtual_JJ teams_NN2 are_VBR formed_VVN ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 how_RRQ their_APPGE subsequent_JJ development_NN1 and_CC adaptation_NN1 processes_NN2 (_( or_CC lack_NN1 thereof_RR )_) can_VM impact_NN1 performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 study_NN1 has_VHZ some_DD limitations_NN2 that_CST future_JJ research_NN1 should_VM address_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 indicated_VVD a_AT1 good_JJ model_NN1 fit_NN1 (_( StressI_NP1 =_FO 0.20_MC ;_; recommended_VVD lower_JJR than_CSN 0.37_MC ;_; Sturrock_NP1 &;_NULL Rocha_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC )_) and_CC an_AT1 acceptable_JJ Protest_NN1 value_NN1 ,_, rm_NNU =_FO 0.71_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 ≤_FO 0.001_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA noted_VVN earlier_RRR ,_, only_JJ data_NN from_II SRTTs_NP1 were_VBDR summarised_VVN ,_, and_CC all_DB effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 were_VBDR converted_VVN to_II Hedges_NN2 '_NULL g_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT vividness_NN1 condition_NN1 ,_, respondents_NN2 were_VBDR presented_VVN with_IW images_NN2 and_CC figures_NN2 illustrating_VVG the_AT declining_JJ water_NN1 levels_NN2 over_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 was_VBDZ established_VVN to_TO ensure_VVI a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO justice_NN1 after_II a_AT1 match_NN1 in_II 1891_MC ,_, when_RRQ the_AT Aston_NP1 Villa_NP1 goalkeeper_NN1 ,_, with_IW his_APPGE side_NN1 leading_VVG 1–0_MCMC ,_, kicked_VVD the_AT only_JJ football_NN1 out_II21 of_II22 the_AT stadium_NN1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO kill_VVI the_AT remaining_JJ two_MC minutes_NNT2 of_IO the_AT game_NN1 and_CC to_TO secure_VVI his_APPGE team_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 victory_NN1 against_II Stoke_NP1 City_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Child_NN1 negativity_NN1 towards_II parent_NN1 was_VBDZ negatively_RR associated_VVN with_IW stimulation_NN1 of_IO cognition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO assess_VVI mental_JJ load_NN1 we_PPIS2 devised_VVD a_AT1 34-question_JJ test_NN1 consisting_VVG of_IO various_JJ arithmetic_NN1 problems_NN2 that_CST can_VM be_VBI solved_VVN without_IW the_AT use_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 calculator_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Supportive_JJ role_NN1 was_VBDZ included_VVN as_II a_AT1 covariate_NN1 for_IF emotional_JJ support_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, similarly_RR to_II the_AT network_NN1 disruption_NN1 hypothesized_VVD to_TO induce_VVI spatial_JJ neglect_NN1 ,_, delirium_NN1 may_VM stem_VVI from_II a_AT1 diffuse_JJ network_NN1 disconnectivity_NN1 disrupting_VVG both_RR ascending_JJ and_CC descending_JJ connections_NN2 to_II the_AT ARAS_NP2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT significant_JJ differences_NN2 were_VBDR found_VVN in_II the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO sweet_JJ likers_NN2 among_II patients_NN2 with_IW recurrent_JJ depressive_NN1 disorder_NN1 (_( 55.0%_FO )_) ,_, BPD_NP1 (_( 66.6%_FO )_) ,_, and_CC controls_NN2 (_( 63.3%_FO )_) (_( Swiecicki_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II what_DDQ is_VBZ for_IF him_PPHO1 the_AT worst-case_JJ scenario_NN1 ,_, his_APPGE obligation_NN1 to_TO provide_VVI resources_NN2 continues_VVZ even_RR after_II divorce_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS by_II then_RT he_PPHS1 gets_VVZ no_AT sex_NN1 at_II all_DB in_II31 return_II32 for_II33 his_APPGE money_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT corresponding_JJ interaction_NN1 was_VBDZ nonsignificant_JJ for_IF error_NN1 rates_NN2 ,_, but_CCB performance_NN1 was_VBDZ impaired_VVN when_CS irrelevant_JJ categorization_NN1 was_VBDZ easy_JJ (_( 6.1%_FO )_) than_CSN when_CS it_PPH1 was_VBDZ hard_RR (_( 4.8%_FO )_) ,_, yielding_VVG a_AT1 significant_JJ main_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO irrelevant_JJ categorization_NN1 difficulty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hybrid_JJ models_NN2 have_VH0 grown_VVN in_II popularity_NN1 because_II21 of_II22 their_APPGE ability_NN1 to_TO incorporate_VVI both_RR person-centered_JJ and_CC variable-centered_JJ approaches_NN2 to_II understanding_NN1 resilience_NN1 (_( Masten_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bulk_VV0 packaging_NN1 was_VBDZ excluded_VVN to_TO keep_VVI single-unit_JJ packaging_NN1 consistent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 recent_JJ task_NN1 switching_NN1 study_NN1 (_( Van_NP1 '_NULL t_ZZ1 Wout_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
in_II Journal_NN1 of_IO Experimental_JJ Psychology_NN1 :_: Learning_NN1 ,_, Memory_NN1 &;_NULL Cognition._NP1 ,_, 41_MC ,_, 363-376_MCMC ,_, 2015_MC )_) using_VVG the_AT same_DA manipulation_NN1 found_VVD that_CST the_AT time_NNT1 required_VVN to_TO retrieve_VVI a_AT1 task-set_NN1 from_II memory_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX influenced_VVN by_II the_AT number_NN1 of_IO alternatives_NN2 per_RR21 se_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Depending_II21 on_II22 the_AT features_NN2 of_IO the_AT discrimination_NN1 or_CC stigma_NN1 ,_, different_JJ neurobiological_JJ stress_NN1 reactions_NN2 occur_VV0 (_( i.e._REX ,_, cortisol_NN1 reactivity_NN1 vs._II blunting_VVG )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interpretation_NN1 shapes_NN2 perceptions_NN2 of_IO the_AT alleged_JJ victim_NN1 ,_, the_AT alleged_JJ perpetrator_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT entire_JJ context_NN1 of_IO the_AT situation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II extension_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 course_NN1 actually_RR makes_VVZ life_NN1 generally_RR more_RGR interesting_JJ because_II21 of_II22 its_APPGE emphasis_NN1 on_II analysis_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ we_PPIS2 see_VV0 the_AT world_NN1 (_( our_APPGE "_" multiple_JJ subjectivities_NN2 "_" )_) for_IF a_AT1 really_RR engaged_JJ student_NN1 ,_, the_AT topic_NN1 can_VM '_NULL t_ZZ1 be_VBI separated_VVN out_RP from_II daily_JJ life_NN1 and_CC so_RR one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 learning_VVG in_II the_AT course_NN1 I_PPIS1 think_VV0 directly_RR contributes_VVZ to_II a_AT1 learning_NN1 experience_NN1 and_CC experience_NN1 of_IO engagement_NN1 with_IW everyday_JJ life_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ,_, reminders_NN2 of_IO mortality_NN1 can_VM lead_VVI people_NN to_TO consume_VVI products_NN2 that_CST reinforce_VV0 their_APPGE sense_NN1 of_IO value_NN1 in_II society_NN1 ,_, thereby_RR reducing_VVG the_AT perceived_JJ self-discrepancy_NN1 between_II their_APPGE actual_JJ and_CC ideal_JJ sociocultural_JJ status_NN1 (_( Mandel_NP1 &;_NULL Heine_NP1 ,_, 1999_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS it_PPH1 has_VHZ been_VBN shown_VVN that_CST individuals_NN2 choose_VV0 romantic_JJ partners_NN2 who_PNQS have_VH0 similar_JJ psychological_JJ characteristics_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Luo_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC )_) ,_, little_RR to_II nothing_PN1 is_VBZ known_VVN about_II the_AT role_NN1 that_CST vocational_JJ interests_NN2 play_VV0 in_II partner_NN1 selection_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 discuss_VV0 the_AT numerical_JJ mathematics_NN1 of_IO simulating_VVG first-passage_JJ time_NNT1 distributions_NN2 ,_, followed_VVN by_II the_AT details_NN2 of_IO the_AT software_NN1 implementation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lie-tellers_NN2 (_( n_ZZ1 =_FO 46_MC ,_, Mage_NP1 =_FO 10.43_MC years_NNT2 ,_, SDage_NP1 =_FO .81_MC years_NNT2 )_) ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, were_VBDR interviewed_VVN about_II an_AT1 event_NN1 that_CST they_PPHS2 had_VHD not_XX experienced_VVN and_CC were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO convince_VVI the_AT interviewer_NN1 that_CST they_PPHS2 had_VHD already_RR taken_VVN part_NN1 in_II the_AT event_NN1 ,_, when_CS in_II fact_NN1 they_PPHS2 had_VHD not_XX ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 said_VVD ,_, there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 growing_JJ consensus_NN1 amongst_II researchers_NN2 that_CST at-least_DAT a_AT1 sub_JJ group_NN1 of_IO anorexia_NN1 patients_NN2 should_VM rightly_RR be_VBI classified_VVN as_CSA delusional_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Provider_NN1 autonomy_NN1 has_VHZ long_RR been_VBN a_AT1 value_NN1 in_II American_JJ health_NN1 care_NN1 and_CC among_II physicians_NN2 (_( Emanuel_NP1 and_CC Pearson_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Mechanic_NN1 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ;_; the_AT simple_JJ fact_NN1 that_CST so_RG many_DA2 US_NP1 health_NN1 care_NN1 providers_NN2 have_VH0 remained_VVN in_II small_JJ provider_NN1 organizations_NN2 suggests_VVZ a_AT1 preference_NN1 among_II some_DD providers_NN2 to_TO be_VBI in_II smaller_JJR organizations_NN2 where_CS they_PPHS2 retain_VV0 autonomy_NN1 and_CC control_NN1 ,_, rather_CS21 than_CS22 become_VVI employees_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 very_RG large_JJ system_NN1 or_CC group_NN1 practice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF punctive_JJ count_NN1 events_NN2 ,_, using_VVG a_AT1 ditransitive_JJ light_JJ verb_NN1 construction_NN1 instead_II21 of_II22 the_AT transitive_JJ verb_NN1 cut_VV0 the_AT time_NNT1 estimates_VVZ in_II half_DB ,_, from_II about_RG 40_MC to_II about_RG 20_MC s_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF durative_JJ count_NN1 items_NN2 ,_, the_AT effect_NN1 was_VBDZ smaller_JJR (_( transitive_JJ =31_FO min_NNU ,_, ditransitive_JJ =27_FO min_NNU )_) ,_, but_CCB in_II durative_JJ mass_JJ items_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ even_RR stronger_JJR than_CSN for_IF punctive_JJ count_NN1 events_NN2 (_( transitive_JJ =50_FO min_NNU ,_, ditransitive_JJ =29_FO min_NNU )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Study_NN1 3_MC extended_VVD the_AT evidence_NN1 to_TO include_VVI giving_VVG observed_JJ ,_, not_XX just_RR self-reported_JJ ,_, albeit_CS with_IW limitations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT novelty_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE investigation_NN1 is_VBZ therefore_RR that_CST we_PPIS2 suggest_VV0 a_AT1 mechanistic_JJ link_NN1 between_II depressive_NN1 ruminative_JJ processes_NN2 and_CC executive_NN1 deficits_NN2 at_II the_AT classical_JJ Stroop_NN1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Control_VV0 participants_NN2 were_VBDR tested_VVN only_RR once_RR ,_, with_IW equal_JJ numbers_NN2 of_IO participants_NN2 tested_VVN on_II each_DD1 list_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 suggests_VVZ that_CST the_AT typeface_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 second-order_NN1 ,_, albeit_CS significant_JJ ,_, framing_VVG element_NN1 of_IO the_AT work_NN1 when_CS compared_VVN to_II this_DD1 type_NN1 of_IO edition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, output_NN1 interference_NN1 could_VM at_RR21 most_RR22 explain_VVI around_RG 16%_NNU of_IO the_AT decline_NN1 observed_VVN in_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT mean_JJ error_NN1 rate_NN1 was_VBDZ 1.7%_FO in_II the_AT control_NN1 group_NN1 (_( range_NN1 0–6.3%_FO )_) ,_, 6.5%_FO in_II the_AT LIFG_NN1 group_NN1 (_( 3.0–16.3%_FO )_) and_CC 11.9%_FO in_II the_AT LMTG_NP1 group_NN1 (_( 0–34.1%_FO )_) ,_, leading_VVG to_II 6.2%_FO of_IO data_NN exclusion_NN1 due_II21 to_II22 errors_NN2 (_( 344_MC trials_NN2 among_II the_AT 5544_MC observations_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT divine_JJ attachment_NN1 framework_NN1 within_II the_AT past_JJ few_DA2 decades_NNT2 has_VHZ received_VVN rigorous_JJ empirical_JJ support_NN1 from_II a_AT1 scientific_JJ perspective_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS the_AT Enneagram_NN1 has_VHZ its_APPGE roots_NN2 in_II a_AT1 long_JJ oral_JJ tradition_NN1 spanning_VVG centuries_NNT2 from_II multiple_JJ ancient_JJ wisdom_NN1 sources_NN2 with_IW a_AT1 more_RGR spiritual_JJ and_CC contemplative_JJ approach_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 sustained_JJ attention_NN1 to_II facial_JJ expressions_NN2 of_IO emotion_NN1 (_( afraid_JJ ,_, happy_JJ ,_, sad_JJ )_) was_VBDZ indexed_VVN using_VVG the_AT late_JJ positive_JJ potential_NN1 (_( LPP_NP1 )_) event-related_JJ potential_NN1 (_( ERP_NP1 )_) component_NN1 during_II a_AT1 computer-based_JJ task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT single_JJ source_NN1 interpretation_NN1 is_VBZ challenged_VVN by_II the_AT finding_NN1 that_CST the_AT phonological_JJ accuracy_NN1 of_IO nonword_NN1 errors_NN2 (_( target-error_JJ overlap_NN1 ,_, measured_VVN by_II the_AT POI_NN1 )_) was_VBDZ lower_JJR in_II naming_NN1 than_CSN in_II reading_VVG and_CC repetition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Responses_NN2 to_II these_DD2 items_NN2 were_VBDR summed_VVN to_TO create_VVI a_AT1 composite_JJ variable_NN1 for_IF depressive_NN1 symptoms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 with_IW an_AT1 individualistic_JJ worldview_NN1 defined_VVD control_NN1 as_CSA not_XX letting_VVG others_NN2 see_VVI the_AT feeling_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS those_DD2 with_IW a_AT1 collectivist_NN1 worldview_NN1 defined_VVD control_NN1 as_CSA managing_VVG the_AT emotions_NN2 so_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR not_XX controlling_VVG the_AT person_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 approach_NN1 takes_VVZ into_II consideration_NN1 true_JJ differences_NN2 among_II studies_NN2 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 differences_NN2 among_II participants_NN2 (_( Schmidt_NP1 ,_, Oh_UH ,_, &;_NULL Hayes_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, all_DB the_AT verbal_JJ recall_NN1 tasks_NN2 loaded_VVN together_RL ,_, and_CC the_AT visual_JJ recall_NN1 tasks_NN2 loaded_VVN on_II the_AT spatial_JJ component_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Neither_RR the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO reconstruction_NN1 nor_CC its_APPGE interaction_NN1 with_IW age_NN1 group_NN1 was_VBDZ significant_JJ in_II any_DD analysis_NN1 ,_, although_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO note_VVI that_CST these_DD2 analyses_NN2 could_VM have_VHI been_VBN affected_VVN by_II low_JJ power_NN1 due_II21 to_II22 relatively_RR low_JJ n_ZZ1 in_II some_DD cells_NN2 ,_, particularly_RR for_IF the_AT time-of-day_NNT1 and_CC year_NNT1 analyses_NN2 (_( significant_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO age_NN1 group_NN1 emerged_VVD for_IF day-of-the-week_JJ and_CC month_NNT1 estimates_NN2 ,_, as_CSA reported_VVN above_RL )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE data_NN bear_VV0 most_RGT straightforwardly_RR on_II the_AT Suppositional_JJ Theory_NN1 of_IO conditionals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 may_VM reflect_VVI the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST 54%_NNU of_IO our_APPGE respondents_NN2 had_VHD no_AT qualifications_NN2 ,_, again_RT ,_, over_RG three_MC times_NNT2 the_AT national_JJ average_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 randomized_JJ cross-over_NN1 study_NN1 included_VVD 22_MC USA_NP1 adults_NN2 with_IW cocaine_NN1 use_NN1 disorder_NN1 who_PNQS were_VBDR non-treatment_JJ seekers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 constructed_VVD scatterplots_NN2 of_IO delay_NN1 and_CC the_AT dependent_JJ variables_NN2 ,_, conditioning_VVG the_AT plots_NN2 on_II the_AT experimental_JJ factors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ difficult_JJ to_TO compare_VVI treatment_NN1 outcomes_NN2 across_II studies_NN2 because_CS different_JJ SITBs_NN2 were_VBDR examined_VVN using_VVG a_AT1 variety_NN1 of_IO measures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT remaining_JJ children_NN2 were_VBDR in_II the_AT No-Break_NP1 Condition_NN1 ,_, whereby_RRQ children_NN2 still_RR played_VVN with_IW the_AT six_MC toys_NN2 ,_, but_CCB all_DB functioned_VVD normally_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 condition_NN1 lasted_VVD until_II an_AT1 empirical_JJ stability_NN1 criterion_NN1 (_( see_VV0 below_RL )_) was_VBDZ met_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT interaction_NN1 effect_NN1 in_RR21 particular_RR22 demonstrates_VVZ that_CST patients_NN2 with_IW LE_NP1 show_VV0 a_AT1 greater_JJR drop_NN1 in_II performance_NN1 over_II the_AT week_NNT1 than_CSN non-LE_NP1 patients_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interviewers_NN2 were_VBDR provided_VVN with_IW the_AT same_DA definitions_NN2 and_CC examples_NN2 of_IO IM_NN1 tactics_NN2 as_II the_AT applicants_NN2 before_II watching_VVG the_AT video-recorded_JJ interviews_NN2 and_CC coded_VVD the_AT tactics_NN2 exactly_RR as_CSA the_AT applicants_NN2 did_VDD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR a_AT1 few_DA2 studies_NN2 have_VH0 explored_VVN whether_CSW certain_JJ characteristics_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 location_NN1 are_VBR related_VVN to_II levels_NN2 of_IO crime_NN1 at_II specific_JJ times_NNT2 of_IO day_NNT1 (_( Boessen_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Haberman_NP1 &;_NULL Ratcliffe_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_RRQ researchers_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST semantic_JJ or_CC phonological_JJ representations_NN2 might_VM be_VBI impoverished_JJ or_CC poorly_RR specified_VVN in_II children_NN2 with_IW WFD_NP1 ,_, this_DD1 presumably_RR implies_VVZ that_CST the_AT boundaries_NN2 between_II representations_NN2 of_IO different_JJ word_NN1 meanings_NN2 or_CC word_NN1 sounds_NN2 are_VBR inadequate_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 samples_NN2 were_VBDR recruited_VVN at_II various_JJ locations_NN2 around_II campus_NN1 and_CC asked_VVD to_TO volunteer_VVI their_APPGE time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT overall_JJ trial_NN1 rejection_NN1 rate_NN1 was_VBDZ 4.2%_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA before_RT ,_, speed_NN1 ratings_NN2 that_CST took_VVD less_DAR than_CSN 200_MC ms_NN1 or_CC greater_JJR than_CSN 4,000_MC ms_NN1 to_TO provide_VVI were_VBDR recoded_VVN as_CSA system-missing_JJ (_( 7.5%_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Future_JJ studies_NN2 in_II which_DDQ participants_NN2 imagine_VV0 interaction_NN1 partners_NN2 of_IO both_DB2 genders_NN2 would_VM provide_VVI important_JJ information_NN1 about_II gender_NN1 interaction_NN1 effects_NN2 in_II emotional_JJ display_NN1 rules_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II enabling_VVG the_AT toddler_NN1 to_TO guide_VVI the_AT direction_NN1 of_IO the_AT interaction_NN1 ,_, our_APPGE study_NN1 provides_VVZ a_AT1 valuable_JJ opportunity_NN1 to_TO explore_VVI the_AT various_JJ types_NN2 of_IO toddler_NN1 reactions_NN2 to_II the_AT crying_NN1 baby_NN1 paradigm_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, attentional_JJ ,_, affective_JJ ,_, cognitive_JJ ,_, prosocial_JJ ,_, and_CC empathic_JJ responses_NN2 )_) as_CSA predictors_NN2 of_IO parental_JJ discourse_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT test_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 disruptive_JJ operation_NN1 is_VBZ used_VVN such_II21 as_II22 extinction_NN1 ,_, prefeeding_VVG or_CC response-independent_JJ reinforcers_NN2 during_II intercomponent_JJ intervals_NN2 (_( ICI_NP1 ;_; Lattal_NP1 ,_, 1989_MC ;_; Nevin_NP1 ,_, Tota_NP1 ,_, Torquato_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Shull_NP1 ,_, 1990_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Section_NN1 2_MC we_PPIS2 introduce_VV0 the_AT experimental_JJ design_NN1 and_CC procedure_NN1 and_CC in_II Section_NN1 3_MC we_PPIS2 present_VV0 our_APPGE results_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Social_JJ norms_NN2 ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, relate_VV0 only_RR to_II modes_NN2 of_IO behaviour_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, factors_NN2 may_VM come_VVI into_II play_NN1 that_CST mitigate_VV0 such_DA effects_NN2 and_CC make_VV0 the_AT task_NN1 easier_RRR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Insufficient_JJ insonation_NN1 conditions_NN2 were_VBDR found_VVN in_II 13%_NNU of_IO patients_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX were_VBDR no_AT significant_JJ interactions_NN2 of_IO prime_JJ with_IW between-category_JJ group_NN1 ,_, |_NULL b_ZZ1 |_NULL '_NULL s_ZZ1 <_FO 0.15_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 >_FO .082_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II what_DDQ follows_VVZ ,_, we_PPIS2 consider_VV0 the_AT possible_JJ mechanism(s)_NN2 of_IO word-meaning_JJ priming_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 stepwise_JJ adoption_NN1 of_IO the_AT two_MC types_NN2 of_IO psychological_JJ disengagement_NN1 mechanisms_NN2 has_VHZ been_VBN found_VVN to_TO be_VBI consistent_JJ among_II a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO groups_NN2 of_IO workers_NN2 (_( Laplante_NP1 ,_, Tougas_NP2 ,_, Lagacé_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Bellehumeur_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ study_NN1 tested_VVD a_AT1 model_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT FB_NP1 task_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR cognitively_RR demanding_JJ than_CSN the_AT picturesequencing_JJ task_NN1 ,_, allowing_VVG us_PPIO2 to_TO examine_VVI their_APPGE associations_NN2 with_IW the_AT three_MC EF_NN1 components_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS even_RR automatic_JJ processes_NN2 involve_VV0 at_RR21 least_RR22 some_DD degree_NN1 of_IO outcome_NN1 prediction_NN1 to_TO select_VVI cognitive_JJ actions_NN2 ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 simple_JJ and_CC heuristicsbased_VVD ,_, then_RT attentional_JJ biases_NN2 should_VM also_RR be_VBI found_VVN before_II a_AT1 predicted_JJ emotional_JJ stimulus_NN1 ,_, and_CC not_XX only_RR after_II the_AT actual_JJ presentation_NN1 of_IO one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Existing_JJ surveys_NN2 dealing_VVG with_IW paraphilic_JJ interest_NN1 and_CC experience_NN1 have_VH0 tended_VVN to_TO use_VVI different_JJ modes_NN2 of_IO contact_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II an_AT1 eventrelated_JJ potentials_NN2 (_( ERP_NP1 )_) study_NN1 investigating_VVG L1_FO German-L2_JJ Dutch_JJ speakers_NN2 '_NULL sensitivity_NN1 to_II gender_NN1 violations_NN2 between_II determiner_NN1 and_CC nouns_NN2 ,_, Lemhofer_NP1 ,_, Schriefers_NP1 ,_, and_CC Indefrey_NP1 (_( 2014_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST the_AT L2_FO speakers_NN2 were_VBDR indeed_RR sensitive_JJ to_II such_DA violations-but_CCB only_RR when_CS the_AT materials_NN2 were_VBDR analysed_VVN according_II21 to_II22 each_DD1 participant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 "_" subjective_JJ "_" gender_NN1 assignment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB studies_NN2 reported_VVN here_RL were_VBDR approved_VVN by_II the_AT Ethics_NN committee_NN1 of_IO the_AT Psychology_NN1 Department_NN1 (_( University_NN1 of_IO York_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT findings_NN2 confirm_VV0 that_CST in_II phase_NN1 2_MC ,_, individuals_NN2 within_II the_AT organization_NN1 as_II a_AT1 whole_NN1 are_VBR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI closer_RRR in_II thinking_VVG to_II the_AT followers_NN2 '_NULL central_JJ map_NN1 of_IO phase_NN1 1_MC1 than_CSN that_DD1 of_IO their_APPGE leaders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 demonstrated_VVD higher_JJR VABS_NN2 scores_NN2 following_VVG EIBI_NP1 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 85.88_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 21.22_MC )_) than_CSN at_II entry_NN1 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 74.92_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 11.31_MC ,_, t(25)_FO =_FO 3.11_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .01_MC ,_, r_ZZ1 =_FO .53_MC ;_; Table_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 21-item_JJ measure_NN1 of_IO self-reported_JJ depression_NN1 symptoms_NN2 during_II the_AT most_RGT recent_JJ 2_MC weeks_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, 85%_NNU of_IO input_NN1 sentences_NN2 with_IW postverbal_JJ prepositional_JJ phrases_NN2 had_VHD main_JJ verbs_NN2 that_CST denoted_VVD physical_JJ motions_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 come_VV0 and_CC go_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 showed_VVD that_CST the_AT agreement_NN1 between_II raters_NN2 was_VBDZ high_JJ (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO 0.29-0.48_MCMC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_NN1 5_MC also_RR displays_VVZ the_AT ranges_NN2 of_IO the_AT congruence_NN1 coefficients_NN2 for_IF the_AT loading_NN1 functions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO conclude_VVI ,_, although_CS there_EX has_VHZ been_VBN recent_JJ progress_NN1 in_II demonstrating_VVG the_AT full_JJ breadth_NN1 of_IO criminological_JJ rational_JJ choice_NN1 models_NN2 ,_, this_DD1 progress_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN bounded_VVN by_II a_AT1 failure_NN1 to_TO embrace_VVI the_AT possibility_NN1 that_CST crime_NN1 decisions_NN2 are_VBR more_RRR nuanced_VVN ,_, situational_JJ ,_, and_CC idiosyncratic_JJ than_CSN current_JJ rational_JJ choice_NN1 discourse_NN1 suggests_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR go_VV0 several_DA2 steps_NN2 further_RRR than_CSN in_II previous_JJ work_NN1 using_VVG VR_NP1 to_TO study_VVI burglary_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX expect_VVI the_AT latter_DA to_TO be_VBI practised_VVN regularly_RR as_CSA they_PPHS2 require_VV0 a_AT1 linking_NN1 design_NN1 with_IW test_NN1 takers_NN2 responding_VVG twice_RR but_CCB independently_RR to_II the_AT same_DA itemsan_JJ assumption_NN1 unlikely_JJ ever_RR to_TO be_VBI met_VVN because_II21 of_II22 memory_NN1 effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 were_VBDR informed_VVN that_CST we_PPIS2 were_VBDR conducting_VVG a_AT1 study_NN1 examining_VVG "_" personality_NN1 change_NN1 and_CC the_AT strategies_NN2 used_VMK to_TO do_VDI so_RR ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
The_AT theoretical_JJ perspective_NN1 guiding_JJ this_DD1 study_NN1 stemmed_VVD from_II moral_JJ development_NN1 and_CC social_JJ cognition_NN1 ,_, referred_VVN to_II as_RG social_JJ domain_NN1 theory_NN1 (_( Turiel_NP1 ,_, 1983_MC ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 random_JJ schedule_NN1 ,_, or_CC high_JJ CI_NN1 ,_, involves_VVZ switching_VVG between_II a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO tasks_NN2 or_CC actions_NN2 during_II practice_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, CBA_NP1 ACB_NP1 BAC_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Metabolic_JJ syndrome_NN1 (_( MetS_NN2 )_) is_VBZ a_AT1 clinical_JJ condition_NN1 characterized_VVN by_II a_AT1 combination_NN1 of_IO different_JJ metabolic_JJ factors_NN2 ,_, including_II hyperglycemia_NN1 ,_, hypertension_NN1 ,_, reduced_VVD high-density_JJ lipoprotein_NN1 cholesterol_NN1 ,_, elevated_JJ triglycerides_NN2 ,_, and_CC abdominal_JJ obesity_NN1 (_( Alberti_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 cross-sectional_JJ study_NN1 examined_VVD the_AT development_NN1 of_IO morphological_JJ awareness_NN1 in_II Greek_JJ children_NN2 4–7_MCMC years_NNT2 old_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Turning_VVG to_II the_AT response-set_JJ analysis_NN1 ,_, three_MC participants_NN2 were_VBDR best_JJT fit_JJ by_II the_AT Number_NN1 model_NN1 ;_; these_DD2 participants_NN2 were_VBDR excluded_VVN from_II further_JJR analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, many_DA2 caregivers_NN2 report_VV0 that_CST providing_VVG care_NN1 to_II loved_JJ ones_NN2 is_VBZ rewarding_JJ and_CC feel_VV0 a_AT1 little_JJ stress_NN1 (_( Roth_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 these_DD2 observational_JJ studies_NN2 could_VM not_XX avoid_VVI the_AT bias_NN1 by_II a_AT1 "_" healthy_JJ caregiver_NN1 effect_NN1 "_" ,_, i.e._REX individuals_NN2 with_IW a_AT1 robust_JJ constitution_NN1 are_VBR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO enter/remain_VVI in_II caregiving_VVG situations_NN2 ,_, or_CC alternatively_RR ,_, individuals_NN2 who_PNQS become_VV0 sickened_VVN by_II the_AT burden_NN1 of_IO caregiving_VVG exit_NN1 from_II their_APPGE situation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 also_RR bet_VV0 my_APPGE Nana_NN1 10_MC push_VV0 ups_NN2 that_CST Tom_NP1 Hawkins_NP1 or_CC Daniel_NP1 Menzel_NP1 would_VM score_VVI first_MD (_( Pitt_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2017_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
T-test_NN1 of_IO AI_NN1 values_NN2 yielded_VVD a_AT1 significant_JJ group_NN1 difference_NN1 in_II MFG_NP1 (_( t_ZZ1 =_FO 2.14_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.05_MC )_) ,_, SPL_NP1 (_( t_ZZ1 =_FO 2.11_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.05_MC )_) and_CC global_JJ ROI_NN1 (_( t_ZZ1 =_FO 2.68_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.05_MC )_) ,_, but_CCB not_XX in_II IPL_NP1 (_( t_ZZ1 =_FO 1.29_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 >_FO 0.05_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT main_JJ effect_NN1 for_IF Group_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX significant_JJ ,_, F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 40_MC )_) =_FO 2.95_MC ,_, ns_FO ,_, nor_CC was_VBDZ the_AT interaction_NN1 ,_, F_ZZ1 <_FO 1.0_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT calculation_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 D-score_NN1 ,_, the_AT reaction_NN1 times_NNT2 of_IO incorrect_JJ responses_NN2 are_VBR replaced_VVN by_II the_AT mean_JJ reaction_NN1 time_NNT1 of_IO the_AT correct_JJ responses_NN2 of_IO that_DD1 task_NN1 plus_II an_AT1 error_NN1 penalty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Skeptics_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 theory_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, have_VH0 noted_VVN that_CST not_XX only_RR would_VM a_AT1 disregard_NN1 for_IF the_AT truth_NN1 solve_VV0 most_DAT of_IO these_DD2 problems_NN2 without_IW the_AT very_RG real_JJ costs_NN2 of_IO inaccuracy_NN1 &lsqb;_( 14,15_MC &rsqb;_) ,_, but_CCB that_CST most_DAT examples_NN2 of_IO self-deception_NN1 do_VD0 not_XX involve_VVI deceiving_VVG other_JJ people_NN &lsqb;_( 16_MC &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, carriers_NN2 of_IO susceptibility_NN1 gene_NN1 variants_NN2 may_VM indeed_RR be_VBI more_RGR vulnerable_JJ to_II the_AT negative_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO adverse_JJ experiences_NN2 but_CCB will_VM also_RR benefit_VVI disproportionately_RR from_II supportive_JJ exposures_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ explains_VVZ the_AT relatively_RR high_JJ population_NN1 frequencies_NN2 of_IO gene_NN1 variants_NN2 investigated_VVN in_II GXE_NP1 studies_NN2 informed_VVN by_II diathesis-stress_JJ thinking_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 important_JJ question_NN1 to_TO address_VVI is_VBZ :_: What_DDQ happens_VVZ when_RRQ competence_NN1 and_CC character_NN1 are_VBR at_II odds_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 next_MD sought_VVD to_TO assess_VVI whether_CSW the_AT benefit_NN1 to_II performance_NN1 gained_VVN by_II the_AT simultaneous_JJ presentation_NN1 of_IO targets_NN2 and_CC foils_VVZ in_II the_AT Forced_JJ Choice_NN1 test_NN1 was_VBDZ constrained_VVN by_II individual_JJ differences_NN2 in_II representational_JJ quality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 discuss_VV0 how_RRQ the_AT proposed_JJ super-learning_NN1 hypothesis_NN1 furnishes_VVZ answers_NN2 to_II several_DA2 open_JJ issues_NN2 in_II motor_NN1 learning_NN1 literature_NN1 (_( Section_NN1 6_MC )_) ,_, and_CC draw_VV0 the_AT conclusions_NN2 of_IO our_APPGE analysis_NN1 (_( Section_NN1 7_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Several_DA2 early_JJ studies_NN2 of_IO TPCs_NP1 investigated_VVD their_APPGE effects_NN2 on_II consumers_NN2 '_NULL expectations_NN2 of_IO the_AT price_NN1 discount_NN1 after_II exposure_NN1 to_II TPCs_NP1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 the_AT potential_JJ price_NN1 reduction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT aim_NN1 of_IO using_VVG a_AT1 computational_JJ model_NN1 not_XX only_RR to_TO simulate_VVI the_AT individual_JJ profiles_NN2 of_IO children_NN2 with_IW a_AT1 developmental_JJ disorder_NN1 but_CCB also_RR predict_VV0 the_AT outcomes_NN2 of_IO intervention_NN1 was_VBDZ an_AT1 ambitious_JJ one_PN1 ,_, since_CS little_RR computational_JJ work_NN1 to_II date_NN1 has_VHZ investigated_VVN interventions_NN2 in_II atypical_JJ development_NN1 (_( though_RR see_VV0 Harm_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC ,_, for_IF a_AT1 notable_JJ exception_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 36-item_JJ self-report_JJ questionnaire_NN1 assesses_VVZ clinically_RR relevant_JJ difficulties_NN2 in_II emotion_NN1 regulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Infants_NN2 are_VBR sung_VVN to_II and_CC cooed_VVN over_RP for_IF distraction_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 as_II a_AT1 conversational_JJ partner_NN1 (_( Ochs_NP1 ,_, 1982_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Clinicians_NN2 and_CC researchers_NN2 are_VBR urged_VVN to_TO examine_VVI the_AT impact_NN1 of_IO treatment_NN1 timing_NN1 on_II PTSD_NP1 treatment_NN1 effectiveness_NN1 for_IF patients_NN2 with_IW severe_JJ comorbid_JJ depression_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT modelling_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ trials_NN2 becomes_VVZ particularly_RR important_JJ when_CS different_JJ trial-types_NN2 (_( e.g._REX low_JJ and_CC high_JJ probability_NN1 rewards_NN2 in_II Experiment_NN1 4_MC )_) occur_VV0 with_IW different_JJ frequencies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT compatible_JJ and_CC incompatible_JJ blocks_NN2 ,_, however_RR ,_, deifier_NN1 in_II whether_CSW recoding_VVG processes_NN2 are_VBR possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_NNT1 is_VBZ a_AT1 new_JJ study_NN1 that_CST offers_VVZ a_AT1 comparative_JJ test_NN1 of_IO the_AT attitude_NN1 accessibility_NN1 and_CC dissonance_NN1 accounts_NN2 of_IO the_AT QBE_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Data_NN of_IO size_NN1 and_CC household_NN1 situation_NN1 of_IO the_AT population_NN1 were_VBDR extracted_VVN from_II Statistics_NN Netherlands_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 will_VM not_XX discuss_VVI positive_JJ reinforcement_NN1 as_CSA "_" appetitive_JJ "_" or_CC pleasant_JJ and_CC negative_JJ reinforcement_NN1 as_CSA "_" aversive_JJ "_" or_CC unpleasant_JJ because_CS these_DD2 vague_JJ descriptors_NN2 open_VV0 conceptual_JJ rabbit_NN1 holes_NN2 down_II which_DDQ we_PPIS2 prefer_VV0 not_XX to_TO slide_VVI (_( see_VV0 Baron_NNB &;_NULL Galizio_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC ;_; Michael_NP1 ,_, 1975_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_CS21 that_CS22 this_DD1 indirect_JJ pathway_NN1 in_II fathers_NN2 is_VBZ present_JJ in_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 environmental_JJ factors_NN2 influencing_VVG this_DD1 white_JJ matter_NN1 pathway_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 tentative_JJ interpretation_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST coherences_NN2 between_II paternal_JJ and_CC offspring_NN reading_NN1 are_VBR partly_RR genetically_RR driven_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT current_JJ evidence_NN1 provides_VVZ a_AT1 strong_JJ case_NN1 that_CST family_NN1 storytelling_NN1 is_VBZ positively_RR related_VVN to_II family_NN1 bonding_NN1 (_( e.g._REX Koenig_NP1 Kellas_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ,_, adult_NN1 generativity_NN1 (_( e.g._REX Norris_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ,_, and_CC adolescent_JJ well-being_NN1 (_( e.g._REX Duke_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 chose_VVD to_TO focus_VVI on_II gender-based_JJ AA_NP1 policies_NN2 as_CSA this_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 timely_JJ topic_NN1 that_CST attracts_VVZ substantial_JJ interest_NN1 and_CC policy_NN1 debate_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
OAA_NP1 ,_, ID_NN1 and_CC RHM_NP1 designed_VVD the_AT study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Blinding_JJ of_IO participants_NN2 ,_, or_CC at_RR21 least_RR22 to_TO study_VVI aims_NN2 and_CC hypotheses_NN2 ,_, would_VM be_VBI possible_JJ in_II comparison_NN1 trials_NN2 between_II two_MC psychological_JJ treatments_NN2 ;_; full_JJ blinding_JJ of_IO participants_NN2 has_VHZ been_VBN noted_VVN in_II some_DD studies_NN2 of_IO computerized_JJ cognitive_JJ bias_NN1 modification_NN1 training_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Amir_NP1 ,_, Beard_NN1 ,_, Burns_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Bomyea_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Outcome_NN1 expectancy_NN1 refers_VVZ to_II the_AT belief_NN1 that_CST if_CS one_PN1 engages_VVZ in_II the_AT behavior_NN1 (_( e.g._REX recycling_NN1 )_) ,_, an_AT1 outcome_NN1 will_VM follow_VVI such_DA behavior_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, my_APPGE recycling_NN1 will_VM help_VVI the_AT earth_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_DD1 over-reporting_NN1 was_VBDZ massively_RR represented_VVN amongst_II the_AT best_JJT IAcc_NN1 quintiles_NN2 supports_VVZ the_AT first_MD possibility_NN1 (_( without_IW excluding_VVG the_AT others_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II these_DD2 cases_NN2 ,_, adults_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO describe_VVI a_AT1 close_JJ friend_NN1 or_CC relationship_NN1 partner_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT expected_JJ value_NN1 is_VBZ lower_JJR in_II the_AT neutral_JJ treatment_NN1 (_( coefficient_NN1 -0.189_MC ,_, p=0.567_FO )_) ,_, higher_JJR for_IF familiar_JJ firms_NN2 (_( coefficient_NN1 0.097_MC ,_, p=0.714_FO )_) ,_, and_CC even_RR higher_JJR for_IF familiar_JJ firms_NN2 in_II the_AT neutral_JJ treatment_NN1 (_( coefficient_NN1 interaction_NN1 term_NN1 0.079_MC ,_, p=0.831_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO meet_VVI the_AT standard_NN1 of_IO "_" probably_RR efficacious_JJ ,_, "_" a_AT1 treatment_NN1 must_VM be_VBI supported_VVN by_II at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 well-designed_JJ study_NN1 or_CC a_AT1 small_JJ series_NN of_IO single-case_JJ design_NN1 experiments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Why_RRQ use_VVI implicit_JJ measures_NN2 to_TO study_VVI antiBlack_NN1 prejudice_NN1 ,_, but_CCB not_XX antiItalian_JJ ,_, antiPolish_VV0 ,_, antiCatholic_JJ ,_, or_CC the_AT many_DA2 other_JJ prejudices_NN2 that_CST were_VBDR once_RR staples_VVZ in_II our_APPGE field_NN1 (_( Allport_NP1 &;_NULL Kramer_NP1 ,_, 1946_MC )_) ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD trial_NN1 in_II each_DD1 block_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX preceded_VVN by_II a_AT1 trial_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alternatively_RR ,_, utilizing_VVG correlated_JJ residuals_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Kenny_NP1 ,_, 1976_MC )_) has_VHZ been_VBN suggested_VVN for_IF accommodating_VVG method_NN1 variance_NN1 in_II common_JJ factor_NN1 modeling_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE goal_NN1 here_RL is_VBZ to_TO detail_VVI the_AT necessary_JJ steps_NN2 to_TO successfully_RR achieve_VVI a_AT1 self-narrative_JJ reconstruction_NN1 in_II EFT_NP1 ,_, by_II presenting_VVG a_AT1 preliminary_JJ (_( rational-empirical_JJ )_) model_NN1 of_IO client_NN1 process_NN1 and_CC therapist_NN1 activity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO justify_VVI the_AT use_NN1 of_IO the_AT predictability_NN1 metric_JJ rather_II21 than_II22 the_AT more_RGR conventional_JJ consistency_NN1 metric_JJ ,_, we_PPIS2 first_MD verified_VVD that_DD1 predictability_NN1 reflects_VVZ a_AT1 psychologically_RR valid_JJ construct_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT average_JJ age_NN1 of_IO service_NN1 users_NN2 who_PNQS completed_VVD the_AT STQ_NP1 was_VBDZ 40.2_MC years_NNT2 (_( SD_NP1 =_FO 9.6_MC ,_, range_NN1 20-62_MCMC )_) at_II referral_NN1 ,_, and_CC 55%_NNU were_VBDR male_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Methods_NN2 :_: A_ZZ1 systematic_JJ search_NN1 of_IO online_JJ databases_NN2 (_( PubMed_JJ ,_, PsycINFO_NP1 ,_, CINAHL_NP1 Plus_NN1 ,_, Medline_NP1 ,_, and_CC Cochrane_NP1 Library_NN1 )_) was_VBDZ conducted_VVN for_IF primary_JJ research_NN1 examining_VVG psychological_JJ health_NN1 in_II meat-consumers_NN2 and_CC meat-abstainers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Significant_JJ differentially_RR expressed_VVN genes_NN2 were_VBDR identified_VVN as_CSA those_DD2 with_IW a_AT1 fold_NN1 change_NN1 (_( FC_NP1 )_) <-1.1_FO indicative_JJ of_IO downregulation_NN1 or_CC FC>1.1_FO indicative_JJ of_IO upregulation_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 non-stringent_JJ p-value_NN1 of_IO p<0.05_FO was_VBDZ used_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS a_AT1 visual_JJ sighting_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 police_NN2 officer_NN1 might_VM depend_VVI on_II the_AT number_NN1 of_IO citizens_NN2 on_II the_AT street_NN1 and_CC weather_NN1 conditions_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, we_PPIS2 think_VV0 that_CST on_II average_NN1 when_RRQ police_NN2 officers_NN2 are_VBR on_II a_AT1 single_JJ street_NN1 segment_NN1 ,_, their_APPGE cars_NN2 would_VM be_VBI visible_JJ to_II the_AT whole_JJ street_NN1 segment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Connors_NP2 ,_, Lundregan_NP1 ,_, Miller_NP1 ,_, and_CC McEwen_NP1 (_( 1996_MC )_) have_VH0 categorized_VVN ineffective_JJ alibis_NN2 as_CSA "_" weak_JJ ,_, "_" implying_VVG that_CST they_PPHS2 were_VBDR not_XX believed_VVN because_II21 of_II22 the_AT lack_NN1 of_IO strong_JJ evidence_NN1 brought_VVD forward_RL by_II the_AT defense_NN1 to_TO support_VVI their_APPGE veracity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II conclusion_NN1 ,_, there_RL appear_VV0 to_TO be_VBI a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO trans-diagnostic_JJ processes_NN2 common_JJ to_II both_DB2 ADHD_VV0 and_CC CFS_VVZ ,_, as_CSA indicated_VVN by_II the_AT results_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA expected_VVN ,_, randomly_RR paired_VVN samesex_NN1 dyads_NN2 yielded_VVD substantially_RR positive_JJ APCs_NN2 ,_, whereas_CS randomly_RR paired_VVN othersex_NN1 dyads_NN2 yielded_VVD substantially_RR negative_JJ APCs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II stark_JJ contrast_NN1 ,_, Judge_NP1 Darnell_NP1 stated_VVD that_CST straight_JJ pleas_NN2 did_VDD not_XX occur_VVI in_II31 front_II32 of_II33 him_PPHO1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB he_PPHS1 would_VM like_VVI to_TO get_VVI ahead_RL on_II his_APPGE quarterly_JJ reports_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA findings_NN2 diverge_VV0 from_II the_AT crosssectional_JJ results_NN2 reported_VVN by_II Green_NP1 (_( 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, individual-level_JJ data_NN from_II 82_MC countries_NN2 reveals_VVZ a_AT1 linear_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II the_AT frequency_NN1 of_IO religious_JJ worship_NN1 and_CC number_NN1 of_IO children_NN2 ,_, with_IW those_DD2 who_PNQS worship_VV0 more_DAR than_CSN once_RR a_AT1 week_NNT1 averaging_VVG 2.5_MC children_NN2 compared_VVN with_IW 1.7_MC (_( below_II replacement_NN1 )_) for_IF those_DD2 who_PNQS never_RR worship_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interpreting_VVG these_DD2 r_ZZ1 values_NN2 as_CSA effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 (_( Field_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ,_, the_AT data_NN showed_VVD that_CST there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 small_JJ effect_NN1 for_IF truth-tellers_NN2 and_CC a_AT1 medium_JJ effect_NN1 for_IF lie-tellers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR precisely_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 aimed_VVD to_TO explore_VVI whether_CSW perceptions_NN2 of_IO injustice_NN1 and_CC group_NN1 efficacy_NN1 were_VBDR likely_JJ to_TO provide_VVI the_AT basis_NN1 for_IF the_AT emergent_JJ opinionbased_JJ identity_NN1 of_IO Euromaidan_NP1 (_( as_CSA per_II EMSICA_NP1 )_) or_CC ,_, vice_RR21 versa_RR22 ,_, identification_NN1 with_IW the_AT cause_NN1 was_VBDZ likely_JJ to_TO spark_VVI shared_JJ appraisals_NN2 of_IO injustice_NN1 and_CC agency_NN1 (_( as_CSA per_II SIMCA_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Experiment_VV0 1_MC1 examined_VVD whether_CSW participants_NN2 are_VBR sensitive_JJ to_II target-response_JJ association_NN1 and_CC target_NN1 focality_NN1 ,_, intrinsic_JJ and_CC extrinsic_JJ cues_NN2 respectively_RR according_II21 to_II22 Koriat_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1997_MC )_) classification_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR included_VVD a_AT1 test_NN1 for_IF scope_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 when_CS developing_VVG our_APPGE contingent_JJ valuation_NN1 survey_NN1 because_II21 of_II22 concerns_NN2 that_CST ,_, when_CS using_VVG CVM_NP1 ,_, there_EX may_VM be_VBI insensitivity_NN1 to_II scope_NN1 ,_, 24_MC that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, that_CST the_AT expressed_JJ WTP_NP1 value_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX sensitive_JJ to_II the_AT magnitude_NN1 of_IO the_AT commodity_NN1 to_TO be_VBI valued_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, she_PPHS1 might_VM get_VVI everything_PN1 she_PPHS1 needs_VVZ faster_RRR if_CS she_PPHS1 just_RR goes_VVZ shopping_VVG by_II herself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB ,_, as_CSA I_PPIS1 tackled_VVD the_AT shame_NN1 I_PPIS1 was_VBDZ feeling_VVG (_( and_CC I_PPIS1 shall_VM have_VHI more_DAR to_TO say_VVI about_II shame_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE evil_NN1 twin-shaming-later_RRR )_) ,_, as_CSA my_APPGE mind_NN1 returned_VVD again_RT and_CC again_RT to_II this_DD1 particular_JJ reality_NN1 television_NN1 program_NN1 ,_, I_PPIS1 realized_VVD that_RG far_RR from_II being_VBG dissociated_VVN ,_, I_PPIS1 was_VBDZ beginning_VVG to_TO develop_VVI an_AT1 excess_NN1 of_IO associations_NN2 ,_, an_AT1 excess_NN1 of_IO meanings_NN2 ,_, some_DD of_IO which_DDQ I_PPIS1 explore_VV0 below_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT same_DA year_NNT1 ,_, the_AT title_NN1 of_IO the_AT journal_NN1 was_VBDZ changed_VVN to_II British_JJ Journal_NN1 of_IO Projective_JJ Psychology_NN1 under_II which_DDQ it_PPH1 continued_VVD until_II 1997_MC ,_, with_IW Mahmood_NP1 as_CSA editor_NN1 until_II 1995_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 primary_JJ benefit_NN1 to_II such_DA a_AT1 system_NN1 is_VBZ precisely_RR the_AT predictive_JJ power_NN1 it_PPH1 offers_VVZ listeners_NN2 during_II comprehension_NN1 (_( e.g._REX Kamide_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ,_, as_CSA gender_NN1 marking_NN1 allows_VVZ listeners_NN2 to_II narrow_JJ in_II on_II possible_JJ candidates_NN2 for_IF what_DDQ word_NN1 will_VM follow_VVI (_( e.g._REX Friederici_NP1 &;_NULL Jacobsen_NP1 ,_, 1999_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
TEDS_NN2 participants_NN2 included_VVN in_II the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 12,834_MC individual_JJ twins_NN2 )_) were_VBDR those_DD2 children_NN2 for_IF whom_PNQO completed_VVD measures_NN2 of_IO parenting_NN1 ,_, administered_VVN via_II postal_JJ questionnaire_NN1 ,_, were_VBDR returned_VVN from_II at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 of_IO three_MC waves_NN2 of_IO data_NN collection_NN1 :_: ages_NN2 9_MC ,_, 12_MC and_CC 14_MC years_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, one_MC1 third_MD of_IO teachers_NN2 did_VDD not_XX assign_VVI the_AT homework_NN1 ,_, and_CC some_DD indicated_VVD they_PPHS2 do_VD0 not_XX assign_VVI homework_NN1 to_II their_APPGE kindergarteners_NN2 in_RR21 general_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS multitasking_VVG ,_, people_NN can_VM become_VVI overloaded_JJ as_CSA working_VVG memory_NN1 and_CC attentional_JJ resources_NN2 become_VV0 exhausted_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ accounts_VVZ for_IF this_DD1 discrepancy_NN1 in_II choosing_VVG between_II eyewitness_NN1 and_CC alibi_NN1 corroborator_NN1 studies_NN2 An_AT1 explanation_NN1 is_VBZ speculative_JJ ,_, but_CCB we_PPIS2 offer_VV0 three_MC possibilities_NN2 ,_, based_VVN on_II differences_NN2 between_II eyewitness_NN1 and_CC alibi_NN1 corroboration_NN1 paradigms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, for_IF the_AT more_RGR obscure_JJ Trompenaars_NN2 '_NULL model_NN1 of_IO national_JJ cultural_JJ differences_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD little_RR to_II no_AT empirical_JJ research_NN1 done_VDN in_II any_DD domain_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 Moscardi_NP1 and_CC De_NP1 Janvry_NP1 (_( 1977_MC )_) categorizes_VVZ as_CSA interview_NN1 and_CC experimental_JJ methods_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE in_JJ21 vivo_JJ22 study_NN1 has_VHZ also_RR provided_VVN some_DD interesting_JJ insights_NN2 for_IF further_JJR research_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Contingent_JJ reinforcement_NN1 is_VBZ another_DD1 discrete_JJ technique_NN1 that_CST has_VHZ been_VBN tested_VVN on_II its_APPGE merit_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II total_NN1 ,_, 433_MC surveys_NN2 were_VBDR obtained_VVN from_II British_JJ nonusers_NN2 of_IO RMP_NP1 ;_; however_RR ,_, 165_MC of_IO these_DD2 were_VBDR only_RR partially_RR completed_VVN ,_, and_CC as_II a_AT1 result_NN1 were_VBDR discarded_VVN ,_, yielding_VVG a_AT1 test_NN1 sample_NN1 of_IO 268_MC surveys_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT link_NN1 between_II language_NN1 dominance_NN1 and_CC handedness_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO occur_VVI "_" barely_RR above_II the_AT chance_NN1 level_NN1 "_" ,_, except_CS in_II right-hemisphere_JJ dominant_JJ individuals_NN2 (_( Mazoyer_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, more_DAR research_NN1 on_II probing_VVG as_II a_AT1 deception_NN1 detection_NN1 technique_NN1 should_VM be_VBI conducted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT power_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 framework_NN1 lies_VVZ in_II its_APPGE ability_NN1 to_TO explain_VVI human_JJ behavior_NN1 as_II a_AT1 product_NN1 of_IO interactions_NN2 between_II individual_JJ and_CC environment_NN1 (_( Kristof_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC ;_; Lewin_NP1 ,_, 1935_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_CS the_AT demonstration_NN1 ,_, participants_NN2 performed_VVD 10_MC practice_NN1 trials_NN2 in_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 received_VVD full_JJ feedback_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 brief_JJ explanation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_CS fully_RR adjusted_VVN logistic_JJ regression_NN1 analysis_NN1 (_( Model_NN1 4_MC ,_, Table_NN1 3_MC ;_; Fig._NN1 2_MC )_) ,_, serum_NN1 levels_NN2 of_IO inosine_NN1 ,_, guanosine_VV0 ,_, and_CC xanthine_NN1 remained_VVD significantly_RR different_JJ between_II the_AT participants_NN2 with_IW MDD_NP1 and_CC the_AT non-depressed_JJ controls_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Social_JJ support_NN1 perceived_VVN from_II parents_NN2 and_CC peers_NN2 was_VBDZ calculated_VVN from_II the_AT responses_NN2 given_VVN to_II the_AT Social_JJ Support_NN1 Questionnaire_NN1 (_( AFA_NP1 ;_; Landero_NP1 &;_NULL González_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 principal_JJ components_NN2 analysis_NN1 revealed_VVD four_MC components_NN2 associated_VVN with_IW racial_JJ group_NN1 membership_NN1 ,_, including_II negative_JJ racial_JJ experiences_NN2 and_CC salience_NN1 of_IO racial_JJ diversity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Animations_NN2 varied_VVN from_II 3_MC s_ZZ1 to_II 9_MC s_ZZ1 in_II intervals_NN2 of_IO 1_MC1 s_ZZ1 and_CC consisted_VVD of_IO simple_JJ geometric_JJ figures_NN2 moving_VVG within_II a_AT1 familiar_JJ setting_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT key_JJ result_NN1 reported_VVN in_II these_DD2 studies_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT size_NN1 of_IO priming_VVG effect_NN1 did_VDD not_XX depend_VVI on_II the_AT visual_JJ similarity_NN1 of_IO the_AT prime-target_JJ letter_NN1 pairs_NN2 differing_VVG in_CS21 case_CS22 (_( e.g._REX ,_, c_ZZ1 and_CC C_ZZ1 are_VBR visually_RR similar_JJ ;_; a_AT1 and_CC A_ZZ1 are_VBR visually_RR dissimilar_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 third_MD issue_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 word_NN1 association_NN1 responses_NN2 may_VM be_VBI contaminated_VVN by_II association_NN1 types_NN2 that_CST are_VBR not_XX purely_RR semantic_JJ ,_, such_II21 as_II22 collocations/phrasemes_NN2 and_CC idioms_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, "_" rock_NN1 and_CC roll_NN1 ,_, "_" "_" armed_VVN to_II the_AT teeth_NN2 "_" )_) ,_, and_CC priming_VVG could_VM potentially_RR reflect_VVI changes_NN2 in_II the_AT availability_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 other_JJ types_NN2 of_IO associates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 compared_VVD the_AT fixed_JJ linear_JJ time_NNT1 slope_NN1 baseline_NN1 model_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 random_JJ time_NNT1 slope_NN1 (_( Table_NN1 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT adolescents_NN2 in_II our_APPGE study_NN1 reported_VVD a_AT1 similar_JJ prevalence_NN1 of_IO psychotic_JJ experiences_NN2 (_( Horwood_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Scott_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Yoshizumi_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC )_) and_CC victimization_NN1 (_( Radford_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) to_II those_DD2 found_VVN for_IF singletons_NN2 ,_, and_CC are_VBR representative_JJ of_IO UK_NP1 families_NN2 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 geographic_JJ and_CC socioeconomic_JJ distribution_NN1 (_( Moffitt_NP1 and_CC The_AT E-Risk_NP1 Team_NN1 ,_, 2002_MC ;_; CACI_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Overall_RR stochastic_JJ parallelism_NN1 and_CC independence_NN1 were_VBDR generally_RR supported_VVN well_RR by_II our_APPGE RT_NN1 data_NN ,_, and_CC these_DD2 are_VBR best_RRT accounted_VVN for_IF by_II what_DDQ Mulligan_NP1 and_CC Shaw_NP1 (_( 1980_MC )_) called_VVD the_AT independent-decision_NN1 sharing_VVG model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
And_CC in_II so_RR doing_VDG ,_, I_PPIS1 managed_VVD ,_, on_II occasion_NN1 ,_, to_TO leach_VVI the_AT contempt_NN1 from_II my_APPGE partisan_JJ stance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT current_JJ experiments_NN2 ,_, response-strategy_JJ consistency_NN1 and_CC margin_NN1 were_VBDR both_RR substantial_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Variance_NN1 Inflation_NN1 Factors_NN2 (_( VIF_NP1 )_) for_IF all_DB independent_JJ variables_NN2 are_VBR within_II normal_JJ range_NN1 (_( VIF_NP1 <_FO 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, the_AT majority_NN1 of_IO offences_NN2 inboth_NN1 groups_NN2 was_VBDZ directed_VVN at_II a_AT1 person_NN1 ,_, often_RR a_AT1 family_NN1 member_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL oj_VV0 ,_, t-_JJ output_NN1 from_II unit_NN1 j_ZZ1 at_II time_NNT1 t_ZZ1 ;_; bi-_JJ bias_NN1 /_FO external_JJ input_NN1 to_II unit_NN1 i_ZZ1 at_II current_JJ trial_NN1 ;_; wj_NNU ,_, i-_JJ connection_NN1 strength_NN1 from_II unit_NN1 j_ZZ1 to_II unit_NN1 i_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Political_JJ ideology_NN1 and_CC symbolic_JJ racism_NN1 were_VBDR standardized_VVN ,_, and_CC party_NN1 affiliation_NN1 was_VBDZ dummy_JJ coded_JJ (_( 1_MC1 =_FO Republican_NN1 )_) prior_II21 to_II22 entering_VVG them_PPHO2 into_II model.7_FO When_RRQ these_DD2 control_VV0 variables_NN2 were_VBDR added_VVN ,_, Black/poor_JJ automatic_JJ associations_NN2 still_RR predicted_VVN less_RRR support_VV0 for_IF redistribution_NN1 ,_, although_CS significance_NN1 dropped_VVN to_II marginal_JJ ,_, b_ZZ1 =_FO 0.09_MC ,_, SE_NP1 =_FO 0.05_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .088_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Desired_JJ changes_NN2 were_VBDR quantified_VVN in_II a_AT1 manner_NN1 consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT Five-Factor_NP1 Model_NN1 (_( though_RR desires_VVZ pertinent_JJ to_II Openness_NN1 to_II Experience_NN1 were_VBDR rare_JJ )_) ,_, whereas_CS reported_JJ strategies_NN2 were_VBDR distinguished_VVN on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO cognitive_JJ and_CC behavioral_JJ content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 found_VVD that_CST parents_NN2 who_PNQS used_VVD more_DAR elaborations_NN2 and_CC evaluations_NN2 when_CS reminiscing_VVG also_RR asked_VVD more_RGR suggestive_JJ questions_NN2 when_CS interviewing_VVG their_APPGE child_NN1 about_II a_AT1 salient_JJ event_NN1 ,_, but_CCB that_DD1 their_APPGE children_NN2 were_VBDR no_AT more_RGR susceptible_JJ to_II suggestion_NN1 from_II the_AT parent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Explanations_NN2 not_XX coded_VVN as_CSA causal_JJ were_VBDR those_DD2 that_CST merely_RR reiterated_VVD the_AT activity_NN1 to_TO be_VBI explained_VVN (_( e.g._REX ,_, "_" the_AT reindeers_NN2 fly_VV0 "_" )_) ,_, those_DD2 that_CST cited_VVD irrelevant_JJ information_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, "_" some_DD apartments_NN2 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 have_VH0 chimneys_NN2 "_" )_) ,_, and_CC those_DD2 that_CST appealed_VVD only_RR to_II magic_NN1 without_IW hinting_VVG at_II any_DD other_JJ possible_JJ mechanism_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, "_" he_PPHS1 does_VDZ that_DD1 by_II magic_NN1 "_" )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, ACOs_NN2 that_CST consist_VV0 of_IO partners_NN2 who_PNQS complement_VV0 each_DD1 others_NN2 '_NULL resources_NN2 rather_CS21 than_CS22 compete_VVI are_VBR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI successful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Boys_NN2 attended_VVD craft_NN1 lessons_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 wood_NN1 and_CC metalwork_NN1 at_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 (_( Vabariigi_NP1 Valitsus_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 produced_VVD an_AT1 anterior_JJ and_CC posterior_JJ region_NN1 of_IO interest_NN1 (_( ROI_NN1 )_) for_IF each_DD1 hippocampus_NN1 in_II a_AT1 data_NN driven_JJ way_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Compulsive_JJ hoarding_NN1 is_VBZ often_RR '_NULL ego-syntonic_JJ '_NULL ,_, and_CC the_AT Y-BOCS_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 specific_JJ measure_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 disorder_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, most_DAT studies_NN2 are_VBR limited_VVN to_II retrospective_JJ and_CC cross-sectional_JJ designs_NN2 with_IW self-report_JJ questionnaires_NN2 for_IF assessment_NN1 of_IO the_AT typical_JJ use_NN1 of_IO emotion_NN1 regulation_NN1 strategies_NN2 (_( Cloitre_NP1 ,_, Stovall-McClough_NP1 ,_, Zorbas_NP2 ,_, &;_NULL Charuvastra_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Kashdan_NP1 ,_, Uswatte_NP1 ,_, Steger_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Julian_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Tull_NP1 ,_, Barrett_NP1 ,_, McMillan_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Roemer_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Weiss_NP1 ,_, Tull_NP1 ,_, Lavender_NN1 ,_, &;_NULL Gratz_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Experiment_VV0 1_MC1 continued_JJ for_IF a_AT1 minimum_NN1 of_IO 30_MC sessions_NNT2 and_CC until_CS each_DD1 pigeon_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 percent_NNU suboptimal_JJ choice_NN1 stabilized_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Violations_NN2 of_IO parameter_NN1 homogeneity_NN1 can_VM have_VHI different_JJ consequences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR positioned_VVD displaced_JJ aggression_NN1 within_II Goal_NN1 Systems_NN2 Theory_NN1 and_CC found_VVD that_CST it_PPH1 operated_VVD in_II some_DD empirically_RR predictable_JJ ways-namely_REX ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 compensatory_JJ and_CC substitutable_JJ means_NN to_TO experience_VVI efficacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, White_JJ students_NN2 appeared_VVD to_TO find_VVI racial_JJ diversity_NN1 in_II the_AT multicultural_JJ course_NN1 to_TO be_VBI more_RGR salient_JJ than_CSN students_NN2 of_IO Color_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, although_CS most_DAT studies_NN2 have_VH0 aligned_VVN their_APPGE criteria_NN2 with_IW Needleman_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1982_MC )_) guideline_NN1 ,_, the_AT largest_JJT variation_NN1 occurred_VVD among_II decoding_JJ descriptors_NN2 ,_, as_CSA there_EX are_VBR six_MC types_NN2 of_IO categories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT quantitative_JJ results_NN2 from_II all_DB the_AT experiments_NN2 are_VBR summarised_VVN in_II Figure_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 line_II32 with_II33 the_AT executive_NN1 nature_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE deficit_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 are_VBR sensitive_JJ to_II cues_NN2 that_CST reduce_VV0 the_AT requirement_NN1 for_IF internally-generated_JJ constraint_NN1 on_II semantic_JJ retrieval_NN1 and_CC to_II miscues_NN2 that_CST direct_JJ attention_NN1 inappropriately_RR towards_II irrelevant_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO knowledge_NN1 ,_, and_CC they_PPHS2 struggle_VV0 to_TO identify_VVI semantic_JJ relationships_NN2 where_RRQ the_AT relationship_NN1 is_VBZ distant_JJ or_CC in_II the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO strongly_RR overlapping_JJ features_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Noonan_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Corbett_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 further_JJR direct_JJ antecedent_JJ of_IO moral_JJ norm_NN1 is_VBZ represented_VVN by_II biospheric_JJ values_NN2 (_( gamma_NN1 =_FO .21_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 analysis_NN1 ,_, along_II21 with_II22 Gerring_NP1 and_CC Thacker_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 model_NN1 excluding_II OECD_NP1 members_NN2 ,_, highlighted_VVD the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO factors_NN2 other_II21 than_II22 national_JJ income_NN1 to_II the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II the_AT trade_NN1 and_CC non-nutritional_JJ health_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD aspect_NN1 concerns_VVZ major_JJ dimensions_NN2 of_IO psychopathology_NN1 that_CST seem_VV0 to_TO provide_VVI an_AT1 organizing_JJ rubric_NN1 for_IF broad_JJ sets_NN2 of_IO DSM_NP1 disorders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS we_PPIS2 examined_VVD treatments_NN2 for_IF trauma_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 limited_JJ or_CC weak_JJ evidence_NN1 base_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD that_CST five_MC of_IO seven_MC (_( 71%_NNU )_) behavioral_JJ health_NN1 organizations_NN2 ,_, five_MC other_JJ organizations_NN2 ,_, and_CC 42%_NNU of_IO solo_NN1 practitioners_NN2 also_RR offered_VVN treatments_NN2 with_IW a_AT1 weak_JJ evidence_NN1 base_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS the_AT beliefs_NN2 may_VM not_XX necessarily_RR reflect_VVI an_AT1 accurate_JJ view_NN1 of_IO the_AT illness_NN1 ,_, their_APPGE common_JJ sense_NN1 perceptions_NN2 shape_VV0 how_RRQ individuals_NN2 make_VV0 sense_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE illness_NN1 cognitively_RR and_CC emotionally_RR and_CC influence_VV0 their_APPGE subsequent_JJ responses_NN2 and_CC health_NN1 outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT goals_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 study_NN1 were_VBDR twofold_RR :_: First_MD ,_, it_PPH1 tests_VVZ whether_CSW readers_NN2 interpret_VV0 both_RR a_AT1 globally_RR and_CC a_AT1 locally_RR contrastive_JJ sentence_NN1 as_CSA satisfying_VVG the_AT expectation_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 contrast_NN1 set_VVN up_RP by_II OT1H_FO ;_; second_MD ,_, the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 gives_VVZ us_PPIO2 insight_NN1 into_II which_DDQ connectives_NN2 participants_NN2 prefer_VV0 to_TO use_VVI to_TO signal_VVI contrast_NN1 with_IW the_AT OT1H_FO clause_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 indicated_VVD significant_JJ main_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO age_NN1 ,_, F_ZZ1 (_( 2.39_NNU ,_, 384._MC 96_MC )_) =_FO 280.20_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ,_, b2_FO =_FO .620_MC ,_, and_CC types_NN2 of_IO questions_NN2 ,_, F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 172_MC )_) =_FO 40.54_MC p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ,_, b2_FO =_FO .485_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA computing_JJ technology_NN1 became_VVD more_RGR affordable_JJ ,_, access_NN1 to_II the_AT relevant_JJ computing_NN1 resources_NN2 became_VVD democratized_JJ ,_, and_CC traditional_JJ AI_NN1 research_NN1 also_RR lost_VVN some_DD of_IO its_APPGE control_NN1 over_II determining_VVG the_AT field_NN1 of_IO computer_NN1 modeling_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Studies_NN2 on_II retirement_NN1 and_CC subsequent_JJ health_NN1 face_VV0 important_JJ methodological_JJ limitations_NN2 due_II21 to_II22 endogeneity_NN1 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, potential_JJ reverse_JJ causality_NN1 and_CC confounding_VVG in_II the_AT association_NN1 between_II retirement_NN1 and_CC health_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, existing_JJ models_NN2 have_VH0 demonstrated_VVN that_CST charismatic_JJ behaviors_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 collective_JJ vision_NN1 cascade_NN1 between_II individual_JJ leaders_NN2 across_II organization_NN1 levels_NN2 (_( Bass_NP1 ,_, Waldman_NP1 ,_, Avolio_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Bebb_NP1 ,_, 1987_MC ;_; Chun_NNU ,_, Yammarino_NP1 ,_, Dionne_NP1 ,_, Sosik_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Moon_NN1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ;_; we_PPIS2 seek_VV0 to_TO build_VVI from_II this_DD1 foundation_NN1 and_CC expand_VVI these_DD2 findings_NN2 by_II examining_VVG the_AT trickle_NN1 down_RP of_IO collective_JJ strategic_JJ vision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ an_AT1 effect_NN1 of_IO stress_NN1 preference_NN1 (_( β_NULL =_FO 1.19_MC ,_, z_ZZ1 =_FO 3.42_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC )_) ,_, indicating_VVG that_DD1 majority-stress_JJ items_NN2 produced_VVD fewer_DAR suffix-consistent_JJ stress_NN1 assignments_NN2 than_CSN unanimous-stress_JJ items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Research_NN1 into_II communal_JJ coping_NN1 covers_VVZ different_JJ types_NN2 of_IO massive_JJ traumatic_JJ events_NN2 ,_, including_II natural_JJ disasters_NN2 (_( Espinosa_NP1 ,_, Ferrándiz_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Rottenbacher_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Kaniasty_NP1 &;_NULL Norris_NP1 ,_, 1993_MC )_) ,_, and_CC focus_VV0 on_II coping_VVG through_II participation_NN1 in_II rituals_NN2 and_CC demonstrations_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 funeral_NN1 rituals_NN2 (_( Gasparre_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; ODHAG_NP1 ,_, 1998_MC )_) and_CC political_JJ demonstrations_NN2 (_( Páez_NP1 ,_, Basabe_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Rimé_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_CS J?reskog_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 presidency_NN1 ,_, many_DA2 other_JJ non-Americans_NN2 followed_VVD ,_, and_CC meetings_NN2 in_II the_AT Netherlands_NP1 ,_, Belgium_NP1 ,_, France_NP1 ,_, and_CC many_DA2 other_JJ countries_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN organized_VVN since_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT latter_DA case_NN1 ,_, the_AT probability_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 guess_NN1 response_NN1 being_VBG accurate_JJ was_VBDZ p.43_FO (_( less_RRR than_CSN chance_NN1 in_II a_AT1 2-AFC_JJ paradigm_NN1 )_) ,_, whereas_CS when_CS guess-ing_VVG was_VBDZ encouraged_VVN the_AT accuracy_NN1 of_IO responses_NN2 classified_VVN as_CSA guesses_VVZ rose_NN1 to_II p_ZZ1 .78_MC (_( Voss_NP1 &;_NULL Paller_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 work_NN1 investigated_VVD how_RRQ the_AT experience_NN1 of_IO waiting_NN1 differs_VVZ for_IF experiential_JJ and_CC material_NN1 purchases_NN2 -_- that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, money_NN1 spent_VVN on_II doing_VDG (_( e.g._REX vacations_NN2 ,_, concerts_NN2 ,_, sporting_NN1 events_NN2 ,_, meals_NN2 out_RP )_) versus_II money_NN1 spent_VVN on_II having_VHG (_( e.g._REX clothing_NN1 ,_, gadgets_NN2 ,_, jewelry_NN1 ,_, furniture_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ generally_RR presumed_VVN that_DD1 hand_NN1 problems_NN2 in_II older_JJR people_NN are_VBR either_RR stable_JJ or_CC only_JJ progress_NN1 with_IW more_RGR unfavourable_JJ outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT participants_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO respond_VVI to_II the_AT following_JJ open-ended_JJ question_NN1 :_: "_" Please_RR write_VV0 descriptions_NN2 in_II an_AT1 open-ended_JJ way_NN1 about_II why_RRQ and_CC how_RGQ much_DA1 the_AT athlete_NN1 endorser_NN1 is_VBZ fitted_VVN to_II the_AT product_NN1 brand_NN1 or_CC vice_RR21 versa_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO correct_VVI for_IF family_NN1 dependency_NN1 ,_, robust_JJ standard_JJ errors_NN2 were_VBDR calculated_VVN using_VVG the_AT package_NN1 lavaan.survey.fiml_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fit_JJ indices_NN2 are_VBR one_MC1 important_JJ tool_NN1 in_II evaluating_VVG model_NN1 fit_VV0 -_- particularly_RR in_II a_AT1 multi-group_JJ context_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT model_NN1 took_VVD a_AT1 3_MC ×_II 2_MC design_NN1 with_IW fixed_JJ effects_NN2 for_IF Prime_JJ Type_NN1 (_( Auditory_NP1 ,_, Visual_JJ or_CC Unprimed_JJ )_) ,_, Test_VV0 Modality_NP1 (_( Auditory_NP1 or_CC Visual_JJ )_) ,_, and_CC the_AT interaction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT order_NN1 in_II which_DDQ participants_NN2 completed_VVD the_AT condi-tions_NN2 was_VBDZ fully_RR counterbalanced_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_IO note_NN1 foreshadowing_VVG in_II version_NN1 4.0.0_MC ,_, but_CCB not_XX yet_RR fully_RR developed_VVN ,_, is_VBZ the_AT release_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 '_NULL advanced_JJ '_NULL test_NN1 development_NN1 platform_NN1 view_NN1 that_CST includes_VVZ some_DD QTI_JJ extended_JJ markup_NN1 language_NN1 (_( XML_NP1 )_) logic_NN1 validation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 step_NN1 ,_, the_AT quality_NN1 of_IO the_AT content_JJ validity_NN1 studies_NN2 was_VBDZ also_RR evaluated_VVN according_II21 to_II22 whether_CSW participants_NN2 in_II a_AT1 content_JJ validity_NN1 study_NN1 had_VHD been_VBN asked_VVN about_II the_AT relevance_NN1 ,_, comprehensiveness_NN1 and_CC comprehensibility_NN1 of_IO the_AT measure_NN1 items_NN2 and_CC whether_CSW professionals_NN2 had_VHD been_VBN asked_VVN about_II the_AT relevance_NN1 and_CC comprehensiveness_NN1 of_IO the_AT measure_NN1 items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, the_AT means_NN of_IO all_DB comparisons_NN2 were_VBDR calculated_VVN ,_, creating_VVG a_AT1 full_JJ matrix_NN1 (_( value_NN1 items_NN2 ×_II value_NN1 types_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Data_NN from_II these_DD2 21_MC studies_NN2 were_VBDR merged_VVN and_CC subjected_VVN to_II ANOVAs_NN2 and_CC t-tests_NN2 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO assess_VVI the_AT average_JJ subjective_JJ ,_, blood_NN1 pressure_NN1 ,_, and_CC salivary_JJ cortisol_NN1 response_NN1 to_II the_AT SECPT_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT comparison_NN1 of_IO the_AT mean_JJ standardized_JJ bias_NN1 before_II and_CC after_II PSM_NP1 shows_VVZ that_CST matching_VVG significantly_RR reduced_VVD the_AT mean_JJ standardized_JJ bias_NN1 for_IF all_DB covariates_NN2 for_IF all_DB five_MC outcomes_NN2 to_II below_RL the_AT standard_JJ threshold_NN1 of_IO 5%_NNU (_( Caliendo_NP1 and_CC Kopeinig_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ because_CS biological_JJ tissue_NN1 absorbs_VVZ light_NN1 in_II the_AT visible_JJ spectrum_NN1 while_CS remaining_VVG relatively_RR transparent_JJ to_TO light_VVI in_II the_AT redtoNIR_NN1 range_NN1 (_( 650–1,000_MCMC nm_FU )_) ,_, meaning_VVG that_CST the_AT latter_DA penetrates_VVZ past_II the_AT superficial_JJ layers_NN2 of_IO the_AT head_NN1 and_CC interacts_VVZ with_IW cortical_JJ tissue_NN1 (_( Wilson_NP1 ,_, Nadeau_NP1 ,_, Jaworski_NP1 ,_, Tromberg_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Durkin_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Formal_JJ logic_NN1 dictates_VVZ that_CST the_AT probability_NN1 of_IO the_AT second_MD scenario_NN1 must_VM be_VBI smaller_JJR than_CSN that_DD1 of_IO the_AT first_MD because_CS the_AT second_MD scenario_NN1 is_VBZ just_RR one_MC1 instance_NN1 of_IO the_AT first_MD scenario_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 broader_JJR set_NN1 of_IO possibilities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 used_VVD the_AT fair_JJ line-ups_NN2 provided_VVN by_II Wells_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2003_MC )_) but_CCB needed_VVD to_TO establish_VVI a_AT1 designated_JJ innocent_JJ suspect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT aim_NN1 of_IO exploring_VVG the_AT weekday–weekend_NN1 sleep_NN1 variations_NN2 in_II children_NN2 at_II different_JJ obesity_NN1 risks_NN2 ,_, independent_JJ ttests_NN2 were_VBDR first_MD conducted_VVN to_TO compare_VVI sleep_NN1 variations_NN2 between_II groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_NN1 2_MC presents_VVZ the_AT mean_JJ proportions_NN2 of_IO R_ZZ1 and_CC K_ZZ1 judgements_NN2 to_TO study_VVI items_NN2 for_IF all_DB levels_NN2 of_IO arousal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Short-term_JJ orientated_JJ individuals_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 those_DD2 from_II the_AT U.S._NP1 ,_, were_VBDR more_RGR likely_JJ to_II leverage_NN1 email_NN1 as_II an_AT1 appropriate_JJ form_NN1 of_IO communication_NN1 given_VVN its_APPGE value_NN1 in_II quickly_RR and_CC easily_RR providing_CS needed_VVN information_NN1 for_IF achieving_VVG future_JJ goals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II both_DB2 of_IO these_DD2 regions_NN2 ,_, the_AT agentive_JJ condition_NN1 evoked_VVD the_AT greatest_JJT activity_NN1 during_II the_AT significant_JJ clusters_NN2 (_( Fig._NN1 3B_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Findings_NN2 revealed_VVD four_MC significant_JJ moderators_NN2 that_CST explained_VVD approximately_RR one-flfth_JJ of_IO the_AT between-study_JJ variance_NN1 in_II effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 for_IF QBE_NN1 studies_NN2 (_( adjusted_VVN R2_FO =_FO 19.22%_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 :_: d_ZZ1 '_NULL =_FO task_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 ;_; β_NULL =_FO task_NN1 response_NN1 bias_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 3_MC summarizes_VVZ the_AT results_NN2 of_IO studies_NN2 of_IO gender_NN1 stereotypes_NN2 accuracy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS it_PPH1 comes_VVZ to_II the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO glosses_NN2 on_II vocabulary_NN1 acquisition_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, the_AT majority_NN1 of_IO previous_JJ research_NN1 highlights_VVZ a_AT1 positive_JJ role_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 hard_JJ copy_NN1 glosses_NN2 (_( Alessi_NP1 &;_NULL Dwyer_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Hulstijn_NP1 ,_, Hollander_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Greidanus_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC ;_; Ko_NN1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Watanabe_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC ;_; Webb_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC )_) and_CC multimedia_NN glosses_NN2 (_( De_NP1 Ridder_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC ;_; Gettys_NP2 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC ;_; Kim_NP1 &;_NULL Kim_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT outcome_NN1 was_VBDZ the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO letters_NN2 that_CST children_NN2 correctly_RR pressed_VVN on_II the_AT keyboard_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, this_DD1 link_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX mean_VVI that_CST two_MC and_CC both_DB2 are_VBR identical_JJ in_II acquisition_NN1 :_: In_II our_APPGE sample_NN1 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, some_DD children_NN2 who_PNQS were_VBDR classified_VVN as_CSA CP-knowers_NN2 were_VBDR still_RR unable_JK to_TO consistently_RR give_VVI 2_MC items_NN2 when_CS asked_VVN for_IF both_DB2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT BStroop_NN1 and_CC RStroop_VV0 groups_NN2 (_( see_VV0 Figure_NN1 2b_FO )_) ,_, a_AT1 Stroop_NN1 test_NN1 was_VBDZ inserted_VVN in_II the_AT intertrial_JJ interval_NN1 of_IO practice_NN1 trials_NN2 using_VVG video_NN1 editing_NN1 software_NN1 (_( Adobe_NN1 Premier_NN1 CS5_FO software_NN1 ,_, San_NP1 Jose_NP1 ,_, CA_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT CWMS_NP2 consisted_VVD of_IO four_MC blocks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_IO these_DD2 domestic-setting_JJ corpses_NN2 437_MC (_( 20%_NNU )_) had_VHD a_AT1 PMI_NN1 of_IO at_RR21 least_RR22 two_MC weeks_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT 2006_MC Bologna_NP1 conference_NN1 was_VBDZ ,_, accordingly_RR ,_, the_AT first_MD ESHIA_NN1 conference_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 selection_NN1 of_IO the_AT papers_NN2 presented_VVD was_VBDZ hosted_VVN in_II a_AT1 special_JJ issue_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 journal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT same_DA pattern_NN1 of_IO considerably_RR stronger_JJR effects_NN2 of_IO advanced_JJ puberty_NN1 in_II the_AT 10-11_MCMC year_NNT1 olds_NN2 on_II depressive_NN1 symptoms_NN2 emerged_VVD when_RRQ the_AT models_NN2 were_VBDR run_VVN again_RT for_IF family_NN1 mobility_NN1 and_CC emotional_JJ closeness_NN1 measures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT verification_NN1 was_VBDZ performed_VVN for_IF each_DD1 attribute_NN1 included_VVN in_II the_AT questionnaire_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interpreting_VVG these_DD2 relations_NN2 ,_, one_PN1 has_VHZ to_TO be_VBI careful_JJ ,_, due_II21 to_II22 the_AT large_JJ sample_NN1 sizes_NN2 also_RR weak_JJ relations_NN2 become_VV0 significant_JJ ,_, but_CCB nevertheless_RR even_RR these_DD2 weak_JJ relations_NN2 need_VV0 to_TO be_VBI considered_VVN in_II research_NN1 on_II tax_NN1 compliance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Especially_RR in_II the_AT over_RG 50_MC age_NN1 group_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX enough_RR to_TO consider_VVI the_AT sinus_NN1 parameter_NN1 for_IF sex_NN1 identification_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 were_VBDR given_VVN a_AT1 list_NN1 of_IO 17_MC different_JJ activities_NN2 and_CC were_VBDR asked_VVN "_" Have_VH0 you_PPY done_VDN any_DD of_IO the_AT following_JJ in_II the_AT past_JJ year_NNT1 to_TO improve_VVI your_APPGE sex_NN1 life_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI triggered_VVN through_II adolescents_NN2 '_NULL explorations_NN2 and_CC social_JJ interactions_NN2 with_IW family_NN1 ,_, teachers_NN2 ,_, and_CC peers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 second_MD theoretical_JJ perspective_NN1 that_CST serves_VVZ as_II a_AT1 foundation_NN1 which_DDQ motivates_VVZ the_AT study_NN1 of_IO intergenerational_JJ narratives_NN2 is_VBZ Bronfenbrenner_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ecological_JJ systems_NN2 approach_NN1 (_( 1979_MC )_) as_CSA applied_VVN to_II family_NN1 narratives_NN2 (_( Fivush_NP1 &;_NULL Merrill_NP1 ,_, accepted_VVN ;_; McLean_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; McLean_NP1 &;_NULL Breen_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II an_AT1 early_JJ age_NN1 ,_, children_NN2 show_VV0 an_AT1 emerging_JJ but_CCB initially_RR limited_JJ ability_NN1 to_TO navigate_VVI the_AT terrain_NN1 of_IO distributed_JJ knowledge_NN1 (_( Keil_NP1 ,_, Stein_NP1 ,_, Webb_NP1 ,_, Billings_NP2 ,_, &;_NULL Rozenblit_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_JJ verbs_NN2 that_CST were_VBDR shared_VVN between_II the_AT parent_NN1 input_NN1 and_CC the_AT child_NN1 output_NN1 were_VBDR analyzed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Multitasking_VVG phases_NN2 were_VBDR kept_VVN short_JJ (_( 3_MC min_NNU )_) for_IF two_MC reasons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II his_APPGE 1864_MC masterpiece_NN1 ,_, Utilitarianism_NN1 ,_, John_NP1 Stuart_NP1 Mill_NN1 embraced_VVD Bentham_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 Utility_NN1 Principle_NN1 ,_, but_CCB proposed_VVD a_AT1 more_RGR expansive_JJ conception_NN1 of_IO utility_NN1 than_CSN the_AT purely_RR pleasure_NN1 and_CC pain-based_JJ concept_NN1 proposed_VVN by_II Bentham_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO ensure_VVI consistency_NN1 across_II reviewers_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 calibration_NN1 exercise_NN1 was_VBDZ conducted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 data_NN converge_VV0 on_II the_AT prediction_NN1 that_CST when_CS an_AT1 eye_NN1 tracker_NN1 is_VBZ present_JJ ,_, prosocial_JJ looking_JJ behaviour_NN1 will_VM be_VBI the_AT norm_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT findings_NN2 for_IF the_AT QBE_NN1 on_II undesirable_JJ behaviours_NN2 has_VHZ been_VBN particularly_RR mixed_VVN ,_, with_IW findings_NN2 suggesting_VVG both_DB2 decreases_NN2 (_( Levav_NP1 &;_NULL Fitzsimons_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) and_CC increases_NN2 (_( Williams_NP1 ,_, Block_NN1 ,_, &;_NULL Fitzsimons_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) in_II such_DA behaviours_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT birth_NN1 cohort_NN1 was_VBDZ also_RR a_AT1 significant_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO the_AT linear_JJ slope_NN1 of_IO Depression_NN1 ,_, Cyclic_JJ Tendency_NN1 ,_, Inferiority_NN1 Feelings_NN2 ,_, Lack_NN1 of_IO Objectivity_NN1 ,_, Lack_NN1 of_IO Agreeableness_NP1 ,_, and_CC Social_JJ Extroversion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB criminogenic_JJ risk_NN1 factors_NN2 were_VBDR measured_VVN at_II the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO the_AT participant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 interview_NN1 during_II their_APPGE incarceration_NN1 in_II adolescence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 assume_VV0 ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, that_DD1 young_JJ children_NN2 see_VV0 no_AT deep_JJ purpose_NN1 in_II brushing_VVG their_APPGE teeth_NN2 ,_, yet_RR they_PPHS2 learn_VV0 the_AT steps_NN2 and_CC seem_VV0 to_TO represent_VVI and_CC unitize_VVI this_DD1 event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, if_CS the_AT relationship_NN1 is_VBZ close_JJ ,_, the_AT sender_NN1 might_VM be_VBI more_RGR certain_JJ that_CST the_AT recipient_NN1 will_VM be_VBI able_JK to_TO reciprocate_VVI the_AT feedback_NN1 at_II some_DD point_NN1 in_II the_AT future_NN1 (_( Chen_NP1 ,_, Chen_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Portnoy_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT cover_NN1 story_NN1 stated_VVD that_CST some_DD songs_NN2 had_VHD received_VVN airplay_NN1 on_II the_AT radio_NN1 in_II the_AT past_JJ few_DA2 years_NNT2 while_CS others_NN2 were_VBDR still_RR waiting_VVG to_TO be_VBI launched_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF clarity_NN1 ,_, and_CC in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 the_AT observation_NN1 concerning_II perceptual_JJ organization_NN1 that_CST people_NN can_VM only_RR entertain_VVI a_AT1 single_JJ explanation_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 sensory_JJ input_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, the_AT face/vase_NN1 of_IO Fig._NN1 1_MC1 )_) or_CC of_IO their_APPGE life_NN1 at_II any_DD moment_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 assume_VV0 that_CST e_ZZ1 (_( K_ZZ1 |_NULL B_ZZ1 )_) corresponds_VVZ to_II the_AT single_JJ simplest_JJT explanation_NN1 or_CC construal_JJ of_IO K_ZZ1 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 a_AT1 probability_NN1 distribution_NN1 over_II construals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II January_NPM1 of_IO 2002_MC ,_, the_AT APA_NP1 Monitor_NN1 reported_VVD that_CST the_AT then_JJ Committee_NN1 on_II Accreditation_NN1 ,_, now_RT Commission_NN1 on_II Accreditation_NN1 (_( CoA_NP1 )_) ,_, voted_VVD unanimously_RR NOT_XX to_TO remove_VVI Footnote_NN1 4_MC from_II the_AT Guidelines_NN2 and_CC Principles_NN2 for_IF Accreditation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ to_II Aristotle_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 admonition_NN1 that_CST individuals_NN2 should_VM strive_VVI for_IF "_" an_AT1 intermediate_JJ between_II excess_NN1 and_CC defect_VV0 ..._... that_DD1 which_DDQ is_VBZ equidistant_JJ from_II each_DD1 of_IO the_AT extremes_NN2 "_" (_( Aristotle_NP1 ,_, trans._NNU 1999_MC ,_, p._NN1 26_MC ;_; Pierce_NP1 &;_NULL Aguinis_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ possible_JJ that_CST a_AT1 moderate_JJ amount_NN1 of_IO what_DDQ is_VBZ traditionally_RR considered_VVN a_AT1 negative_JJ trait_NN1 could_VM actually_RR be_VBI ideal_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE results_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST DJ-1_MC1 is_VBZ not_XX significantly_RR altered_VVN in_II BD_NP1 subjects_NN2 ,_, however_RR further_JJR studies_NN2 are_VBR needed_VVN to_TO examine_VVI DJ-1_MC1 expression_NN1 levels_NN2 in_II a_AT1 cohort_NN1 of_IO older_JJR patients_NN2 with_IW BD_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 reason_NN1 might_VM be_VBI that_CST our_APPGE sample_NN1 size_NN1 is_VBZ relatively_RR small_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB eligible_JJ studies_NN2 were_VBDR read_VVN and_CC reread_VV0 and_CC key_JJ themes_NN2 listed_VVN for_IF each_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
GFP_NP1 is_VBZ calculated_VVN as_II the_AT standard_JJ deviation_NN1 of_IO the_AT voltages/potentials_NN2 measured_VVN at_II each_DD1 electrode_NN1 and_CC time_NNT1 point_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT control_NN1 of_IO activation_NN1 within_II the_AT lexical_JJ system_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN proposed_VVN to_TO play_VVI a_AT1 role_NN1 in_II cross-language_JJ generalization_NN1 effects_NN2 of_IO treatment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Control_VV0 group_NN1 families_NN2 were_VBDR matched_VVN with_IW families_NN2 from_II the_AT clinical_JJ group_NN1 on_II maternal_JJ education_NN1 and_CC child_NN1 age_NN1 (_( within_II 6_MC months_NNT2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Financial_JJ and_CC prosocial_JJ biases_NN2 in_II31 favor_II32 of_II33 physically_RR attractive_JJ adults_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN a_AT1 phenomenon_NN1 of_IO considerable_JJ interest_NN1 to_II economists_NN2 ,_, social_JJ psychologists_NN2 ,_, and_CC evolutionary_JJ psychologists_NN2 (_( throughout_II this_DD1 article_NN1 ,_, all_DB evolutionary_JJ behavioral_JJ scientists_NN2 are_VBR referred_VVN to_II as_RG evolutionary_JJ psychologists_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Descriptives_NP1 are_VBR shown_VVN in_II Table_NN1 3_MC and_CC Figure_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX claim_VVI that_CST these_DD2 elements_NN2 are_VBR unique_JJ to_II religious_JJ groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Investigators_NN2 can_VM then_RT gather_VVI feedback_NN1 from_II these_DD2 populations_NN2 about_II alternate_JJ dissemination_NN1 and_CC implementation_NN1 methods_NN2 to_TO refine_VVI their_APPGE approach_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 terminological_JJ convention_NN1 militates_VVZ against_II an_AT1 unintended_JJ suggestion_NN1 that_CST one_MC1 measurement_NN1 class_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO be_VBI ignored_VVN in_II31 favor_II32 of_II33 any_DD other_JJ measurement_NN1 class_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 explored_VVD the_AT specificity_NN1 and_CC sensitivity_NN1 of_IO spatial_JJ neglect_NN1 classification_NN1 by_II classifier_NN1 analysis_NN1 ,_, using_VVG disability-relevant_JJ paper_NN1 and_CC pencil_NN1 testing_NN1 (_( BIT-c_NN1 )_) to_TO define_VVI spatial_JJ neglect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT purpose_NN1 of_IO the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX to_TO examine_VVI whether_CSW CYIC_JJ experience_NN1 more_RGR negative_JJ psychosocial_JJ outcomes_NN2 ,_, but_CCB rather_RR to_TO take_VVI the_AT first_MD step_NN1 in_II addressing_VVG whether_CSW CYIC_NP1 in_II fact_NN1 experience_NN1 more_RRR concerning_II offending_JJ outcomes_NN2 between_II adolescence_NN1 and_CC emerging_JJ adulthood_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS this_DD1 might_VM have_VHI consequences_NN2 for_IF lexical_JJ development_NN1 in_II infants_NN2 hearing_VVG such_DA less_RGR engaging_JJ input_NN1 on_II a_AT1 regular_JJ basis_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 would_VM at_RR21 least_RR22 suggest_VVI that_CST there_EX is_VBZ no_AT long-term_JJ cognitive_JJ impact_NN1 of_IO hearing_VVG such_DA less_RGR exaggerated_JJ IDS_NN2 on_II day-to-day_JJ language_NN1 processing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Five_MC of_IO these_DD2 variants_NN2 loaded_VVN onto_II the_AT formative_JJ factor_NN1 negatively_RR ,_, thereby_RR exhibiting_VVG protective_JJ rather_II21 than_II22 the_AT expected_JJ sensitivity_NN1 effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE results_NN2 supplement_VV0 the_AT findings_NN2 from_II past_JJ studies_NN2 in_II which_DDQ either_RR the_AT predictors_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Yeung_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013a_FO ,_, 2013b_FO )_) or_CC the_AT writing_NN1 performance_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Yan_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC )_) was_VBDZ measured_VVN in_II early_JJ elementary_JJ grades_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Among_II White_JJ Americans_NN2 ,_, ITG-DS_NP1 has_VHZ demonstrated_VVN strong_JJ test-retest_JJ reliability_NN1 over_RG four_MC months_NNT2 (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO .74_MC )_) and_CC 12_MC months_NNT2 (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO .68_MC ;_; see_VV0 Hodson_NP1 ,_, Kteily_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Hoffarth_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
HPs_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR accessed_VVN at_II continuing_VVG professional_JJ development_NN1 events_NN2 in_II hospital_NN1 and_CC communitybased_JJ regional_JJ ,_, remote_JJ ,_, and_CC very_RG remote_JJ workplaces_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Eligibility_NN1 depends_VVZ on_II the_AT stimulus_NN1 type_NN1 and_CC the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO significant_JJ artifact_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 :_: Suicide_NN1 attempters_NN2 did_VDD not_XX differ_VVI from_II non-attempter_JJ patients_NN2 in_II any_DD self-reference_JJ measures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_DAT of_IO the_AT variance_NN1 in_II defending_NN1 was_VBDZ attributed_VVN to_II previous_JJ defending_NN1 behavior_NN1 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 is_VBZ possible_JJ that_CST the_AT role_NN1 of_IO empathy_NN1 and_CC self-efficacy_NN1 was_VBDZ underestimated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS the_AT canonical_JJ Swedish_JJ main_JJ clause_NN1 word_NN1 order_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX allow_VVI a_AT1 sentence_NN1 adverb_NN1 to_TO appear_VVI before_II the_AT verb_NN1 ,_, the_AT observed_JJ processing_NN1 difficulty_NN1 indicates_VVZ that_CST the_AT readers_NN2 seem_VV0 to_TO have_VHI initially_RR interpreted_VVN the_AT s?-clause_NN1 as_II a_AT1 main_JJ clause_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Other_JJ research_NN1 was_VBDZ able_JK to_TO show_VVI that_CST higher_JJR job_NN1 strain_NN1 can_VM be_VBI associated_VVN with_IW decreases_NN2 in_II conscientiousness_NN1 (_( Wu_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 will_VM elaborate_VVI here_RL only_RR the_AT first_MD phase_NN1 since_CS validation_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX the_AT focus_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 article_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Unfortunately_RR ,_, the_AT time_NNT1 saved_VVN in_II the_AT total_JJ amount_NN1 of_IO visual_JJ inspection_NN1 needed_VVN for_IF large-scale_JJ ensemble_NN1 averages_NN2 comes_VVZ with_IW the_AT disadvantage_NN1 of_IO increased_JJ latency_NN1 jitter_VV0 that_CST makes_VVZ it_PPH1 more_RGR difficult_JJ to_TO score_VVI the_AT inflection_NN1 points_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 on_II the_AT dZ/dt_NN1 waveform_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Wilhelm_NP1 and_CC Bekkers_NP1 (_( 2010_MC )_) modelled_VVD the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO care_NN1 and_CC empathic_JJ concern_NN1 as_CSA separate_JJ empirical_JJ constructs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, an_AT1 already_RR sound_VV0 ToM_NP1 understanding_NN1 could_VM assist_VVI the_AT forging_NN1 of_IO mutual_JJ friendships_NN2 in_II the_AT first_MD place_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Previous_JJ studies_NN2 have_VH0 found_VVN that_CST socioeconomic_JJ position_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT most_RGT important_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO receiving_VVG disability_NN1 benefits_NN2 (_( H??g_NP1 and_CC Stattin_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC ;_; Knuth_NP1 and_CC Kalina_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Chile_NP1 has_VHZ a_AT1 national_JJ curriculum_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ quite_RG prescriptive_JJ and_CC followed_VVD closely_RR by_II the_AT vast_JJ majority_NN1 of_IO private_JJ schools_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 interesting_JJ point_NN1 concerns_VVZ the_AT length_NN1 of_IO the_AT statements_NN2 in_II both_DB2 studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT targeted_JJ outcome_NN1 should_VM be_VBI specific_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, child_NN1 compliance_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 general_JJ child_NN1 conduct_NN1 problems_NN2 ;_; time-out_NN1 procedure_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 parental_JJ disciplining_NN1 )_) ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 should_VM be_VBI carefully_RR considered_VVN whether_CSW some_DD degree_NN1 of_IO generalization_NN1 of_IO the_AT intervention_NN1 element_NN1 efficacy_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO be_VBI expected_VVN from_II within_II the_AT experimental_JJ session_NNT1 to_II the_AT real_JJ world_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cooperation_NN1 often_RR prevails_VVZ and_CC coexists_VVZ alongside_II dissatisfaction_NN1 :_: otherwise_RR ,_, the_AT relationship_NN1 would_VM cease_VVI over_II time_NNT1 (_( Johnstone_NP1 &;_NULL Wilkinson_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, individuals_NN2 could_VM downplay_VVI the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 discrepancy_NN1 ;_; that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, they_PPHS2 could_VM recognize_VVI the_AT gap_NN1 exists_VVZ ,_, but_CCB view_VV0 it_PPH1 as_II no_AT longer_JJR central_JJ to_II the_AT self_NN1 ;_; if_CS a_AT1 discrepancy_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX important_JJ to_II the_AT sense_NN1 of_IO self_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 should_VM be_VBI less_RGR bothersome_JJ (_( see_VV0 Lisjak_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 did_VDD this_DD1 to_II the_AT same_DA extent_NN1 as_CSA experimental_JJ children_NN2 who_PNQS viewed_VVD a_AT1 grouped_JJ demonstration_NN1 on_II Day_NP1 2_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT comprehensive_JJ account_NN1 of_IO voluntary_JJ and_CC intentional_JJ action_NN1 could_VM therefore_RR omit_VVI the_AT consequences_NN2 of_IO acting_VVG :_: this_DD1 is_VBZ conceptually_RR given_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, at_II that_DD1 point_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ clear_JJ that_CST fNIRS_NN2 had_VHD the_AT potential_JJ to_TO assess_VVI differential_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO cortical_JJ activation_NN1 in_II the_AT brains_NN2 of_IO cochlear_JJ implant_NN1 users_NN2 during_II speech_NN1 processing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Also_RR ,_, women_NN2 were_VBDR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO include_VVI generative_JJ themes_NN2 than_CSN men_NN2 in_II their_APPGE narratives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, our_APPGE results_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST there_EX are_VBR some_DD important_JJ gender_NN1 differences_NN2 with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 their_APPGE relative_JJ roles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ already_RR the_AT case_NN1 in_II both_DB2 countries_NN2 that_CST these_DD2 premature_JJ deaths_NN2 are_VBR substantial_JJ enough_RR to_TO have_VHI implications_NN2 for_IF national_JJ level_JJ mortality_NN1 trends_NN2 (_( Ho_NP1 and_CC Hendi_NP1 ,_, 2018_MC ;_; Seaman_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016b_FO )_) :_: in_II Scotland_NP1 the_AT impact_NN1 is_VBZ evident_JJ in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 it_PPH1 having_VHG one_MC1 of_IO the_AT lowest_JJT life_NN1 expectancies_NN2 in_II Western_NP1 Europe_NP1 (_( McCartney_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) alongside_II a_AT1 stagnating_JJ lifespan_NN1 variation_NN1 trend_NN1 (_( Seaman_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016a_FO )_) ,_, while_CS the_AT USA_NP1 has_VHZ experienced_VVN increasing_JJ lifespan_NN1 variation_NN1 since_II 2010_MC (_( van_NP1 Raalte_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2018_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB groups_NN2 showed_VVD a_AT1 degree_NN1 of_IO ISL_NP1 ,_, yet_RR effect_VV0 sizes_NN2 indicated_VVD a_AT1 greater_JJR degree_NN1 of_IO learning_VVG in_II groups_NN2 with_IW higher_JJR exposure_NN1 (_( 4-Low_JJ and_CC 4-High_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rist_NP1 (_( 1970_MC )_) is_VBZ often_RR cited_VVN as_CSA evidence_NN1 of_IO accumulation_NN1 ,_, but_CCB he_PPHS1 found_VVD neither_RR accumulation_NN1 across_II years_NNT2 nor_CC self-fulfilling_JJ prophecy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, in_II Study_NN1 3_MC ,_, we_PPIS2 investigated_VVD the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II CWs_NP1 and_CC applicant_NN1 self-reports_NN2 of_IO past_JJ faking_NN1 using_VVG the_AT Randomised_JJ Response_NN1 Technique_NN1 (_( RRT_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 comprehension_NN1 research_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 entails_VVZ a_AT1 closer_JJR inquiry_NN1 of_IO the_AT availability_NN1 of_IO situated_JJ and_CC long-term_JJ memory_NN1 resources_NN2 in_RP during_II (_( experimental_JJ )_) comprehension_NN1 tasks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD goal_NN1 of_IO the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 is_VBZ to_TO determine_VVI whether_CSW the_AT Chinese_JJ language_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ lacks_VVZ morphologically_RR inflectional_JJ syntax_NN1 ,_, recruits_VVZ different_JJ neural_JJ networks_NN2 in_II sentence_NN1 syntactic_JJ processing_NN1 as_CSA compared_VVN to_II languages_NN2 requiring_VVG morphological_JJ inflection_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO compute_VVI this_DD1 measure_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 summed_VVD the_AT frequency_NN1 with_IW which_DDQ a_AT1 child_NN1 used_VVD each_DD1 letter_NN1 of_IO the_AT alphabet_NN1 across_II all_DB of_IO the_AT spellings_NN2 in_II each_DD1 test_NN1 and_CC calculated_VVD the_AT Kendall_NP1 rank_NN1 correlation_NN1 coefficient_NN1 (_( τ_NULL b_ZZ1 )_) between_II these_DD2 values_NN2 and_CC the_AT frequency_NN1 counts_NN2 of_IO the_AT letters_NN2 in_II texts_NN2 for_IF preschool_JJ children_NN2 ,_, based_VVN on_II the_AT word_NN1 counts_NN2 of_IO Pinheiro_NP1 (_( 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Also_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX determine_VVI the_AT quantity_NN1 and_CC content_NN1 of_IO intercultural_JJ information_NN1 participants_NN2 may_VM or_CC may_VM not_XX have_VHI been_VBN introduced_VVN to_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 specify_VV0 that_CST elderly_JJ individuals_NN2 may_VM place_VVI greater_JJR emphasis_NN1 on_II accuracy_NN1 ,_, maintaining_VVG error_NN1 rates_NN2 akin_JJ to_II those_DD2 of_IO young_JJ individuals_NN2 at_II the_AT cost_NN1 of_IO higher_JJR reaction_NN1 times_NNT2 (_( Hoffmann_NP1 &;_NULL Falkenstein_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT key_JJ characteristics_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX stipulate_VVI behavioral_JJ guidelines_NN2 for_IF identifying_VVG these_DD2 key_JJ characteristics_NN2 in_II the_AT field_NN1 ,_, but_CCB do_VD0 predict_VVI that_DD1 teaching_NN1 will_VM be_VBI observed_VVN where_CS its_APPGE utility_NN1 in_II increasing_VVG the_AT pupil_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 learning_VVG efficiency_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT highest_JJT (_( e.g._REX ,_, it_PPH1 most_RRT improves_VVZ on_II other_JJ learning_NN1 mechanisms_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, the_AT tendency_NN1 of_IO organisms_NN2 to_TO match_VVI relative_JJ rates_NN2 of_IO primary_JJ reinforcement_NN1 across_II alternatives_NN2 also_RR influences_VVZ choice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lastly_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 conducted_VVD a_AT1 manipulation_NN1 check_VV0 that_CST assessed_VVD the_AT perception_NN1 of_IO the_AT characters_NN2 '_NULL behavioral_JJ autonomy_NN1 (_( "_" The_AT chat_NN1 partners_NN2 act_VV0 on_II their_APPGE own_DA accord_NN1 "_" )_) ,_, emotional_JJ autonomy_NN1 (_( "_" The_AT chat_NN1 partners_NN2 possess_VV0 their_APPGE own_DA feelings_NN2 "_" )_) ,_, and_CC social_JJ competence_NN1 (_( "_" The_AT chat_NN1 partners_NN2 are_VBR socially_RR competent_JJ "_" )_) on_II 5-point_JJ scales_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, one_MC1 of_IO the_AT "_" 29_MC dragons_NN2 of_IO inaction_NN1 "_" that_CST prevent_VV0 people_NN from_II adopting_VVG sustainable_JJ behaviors_NN2 is_VBZ the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST many_DA2 people_NN tend_VV0 to_TO perceive_VVI their_APPGE sustainable_JJ behaviors_NN2 as_CSA insignificant_JJ ,_, thinking_VVG that_CST their_APPGE individual_JJ efforts_NN2 will_VM not_XX matter_VVI overall_NN1 (_( Gifford_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Daily_JJ life_NN1 in_II adolescence_NN1 is_VBZ typically_RR built_VVN up_RP out_II21 of_II22 multiple_JJ contexts_NN2 (_( Phelan_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Appendix_NN1 8_MC shows_VVZ the_AT stability_NN1 of_IO (_( )_) estimates_VVZ up_RG21 to_RG22 2000_MC repetitions_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 were_VBDR 62_MC clinically_RR anxious_JJ and_CC 60_MC non-anxious_JJ children_NN2 aged_VVN 7-12_MCMC years_NNT2 and_CC their_APPGE mothers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT activity_NN1 counts_NN2 were_VBDR collected_VVN at_II a_AT1 30Hz_FO sampling_NN1 rate_NN1 and_CC averaged_VVD over_II 1s_MC2 epochs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT mean_JJ performance_NN1 scores_NN2 for_IF both_DB2 the_AT patient_NN1 and_CC healthy_JJ participant_NN1 groups_NN2 under_II each_DD1 noise_NN1 condition_NN1 are_VBR presented_VVN in_II Table_NN1 3_MC and_CC the_AT results_NN2 of_IO Group_NN1 *_FU Noise_NN1 ANOVAs_NN2 and_CC follow-up_JJ analyses_NN2 are_VBR presented_VVN in_II Table_NN1 4_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO the_AT mediator_NN1 ,_, the_AT direct_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO multiple_JJ victimization_NN1 on_II performance_NN1 was_VBDZ attenuated_VVN ,_, although_CS still_RR statistically_RR significant_JJ (_( LOR_NP1 =_FO -.11_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO &lsqb;_( -.20_MC ,_, -.02_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT psychological_JJ traits_NN2 are_VBR 100%_NNU heritable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT FHS_NP2 is_VBZ a_AT1 semistructured_JJ interview_NN1 with_IW sound_JJ validity_NN1 and_CC reliability_NN1 (_( Weissman_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_II interacting_VVG with_IW their_APPGE peers_NN2 during_II the_AT week_NNT1 of_IO summer_NNT1 camp_NN1 ,_, children_NN2 evaluated_VVD the_AT characteristics_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE camp_NN1 group_NN1 peers_NN2 via_II a_AT1 sociometric_JJ peer_NN1 ratings_NN2 method_NN1 on_II the_AT last_MD day_NNT1 of_IO camp_NN1 (_( Coie_NP1 &;_NULL Dodge_NP1 ,_, 1983_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF stimuli_NN2 we_PPIS2 selected_VVD 24_MC paintings_NN2 ,_, from_II a_AT1 period_NN1 in_II the_AT early_JJ 20th_MD century_NNT1 ,_, to_TO avoid_VVI diachronic_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO variation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD we_PPIS2 test_VV0 for_IF situational_JJ updating_VVG via_II the_AT affect_NN1 heuristic_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS possible_JJ ,_, use_VV0 a_AT1 bigger_JJR screen_NN1 in_RR21 addition_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, when_CS the_AT SOA_NN1 was_VBDZ 133_MC ms_NN1 ,_, the_AT stimulus_NN1 duration_NN1 was_VBDZ 80_MC ms_NN1 while_CS the_AT blank_JJ ISI_NP1 was_VBDZ 53_MC ms_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Using_VVG more_RGR objective_JJ variables_NN2 to_TO assess_VVI the_AT financial_JJ problems_NN2 ,_, Kuhlthau_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2005_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST 40%_NNU of_IO these_DD2 families_NN2 experienced_VVD financial-related_JJ burden_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT recent_JJ replication_NN1 and_CC reproducibility_NN1 crisis_NN1 in_II psychological_JJ science_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Anderson_NP1 &;_NULL Maxwell_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC ;_; Fiedler_NP1 &;_NULL Schwarz_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; Pashler_NP1 &;_NULL Wagenmakers_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) and_CC within_II the_AT broader_JJR scientific_JJ community_NN1 (_( Baker_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; Ioannidis_NP1 ,_, 2005a_FO ,_, 2005b_FO )_) has_VHZ rekindled_VVN the_AT debate_NN1 on_II the_AT highly_RR controversial_JJ null_JJ hypothesis_NN1 significance_NN1 testing_NN1 framework_NN1 (_( NHST_NP1 ,_, Lehmann_NP1 &;_NULL Romano_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) that_CST has_VHZ lasted_VVN for_IF over_RG half_DB a_AT1 century_NNT1 (_( Krantz_NP1 ,_, 1999_MC ;_; Rozeboom_NP1 ,_, 1960_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 from_II the_AT same_DA sample_NN1 were_VBDR included_VVN in_II the_AT different_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO the_AT moderator_NN1 (_( F0_FO mean_VV0 ,_, F0_FO variability_NN1 and_CC F0_FO contours_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT spotlight_NN1 effect_NN1 therefore_RR predicts_VVZ that_CST innocent_JJ suspects_NN2 should_VM tend_VVI to_TO overestimate_VVI the_AT likelihood_NN1 that_CST strangers_NN2 will_VM be_VBI able_JK to_TO remember_VVI them_PPHO2 ,_, leading_VVG them_PPHO2 to_TO confidently_RR report_VVI strangers_NN2 as_CSA alibi_NN1 witnesses_NN2 who_PNQS subsequently_RR fail_VV0 to_TO recognize_VVI them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Patients_NN2 who_PNQS have_VH0 been_VBN classified_VVN as_CSA apraxic_JJ by_II pantomime_NN1 or_CC imitation_NN1 tests_NN2 are_VBR more_RGR often_RR dependent_JJ on_II nursing_NN1 staff_NN (_( Poeck_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Wu_NP1 ,_, Burgard_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Radel_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) and_CC return_VV0 less_RGR often_RR to_II work_NN1 than_CSN non-apraxic_JJ patients_NN2 (_( Dovern_NP1 ,_, Fink_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Weiss_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Wang_NP1 ,_, Kapellusch_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Garg_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ to_II the_AT other_JJ ED_NN1 interventions_NN2 ,_, the_AT therapeutic_JJ assessment_NN1 increased_JJ treatment_NN1 compliance_NN1 but_CCB did_VDD not_XX significantly_RR reduce_VVI DSH_NP1 over_II the_AT 2-year_JJ follow-up_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 events_NN2 included_VVD a_AT1 school_NN1 sports_NN2 day_NNT1 ,_, a_AT1 visit_NN1 to_II the_AT local_JJ cathedral_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 school_NN1 play_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 music_NN1 concert_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 report_VV0 all_DB meanlevel_VV0 results_NN2 from_II the_AT analyses_NN2 without_IW groupmeancentering_VVG in_II Table_NN1 S2_FO in_II Appendix_NN1 A2_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 from_II the_AT structural_JJ MRI_NN2 and_CC TMS_NP1 experiments_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST the_AT rAG_NN1 is_VBZ involved_JJ in_II controlling_VVG the_AT generation_NN1 of_IO spontaneous_JJ eyeblinks_NN2 in_II humans_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT experimenter_NN1 said_VVD ,_, "_" When_CS both_DB2 treats_NN2 are_VBR on_II the_AT short_JJ box_NN1 ,_, Ernie_NP1 always_RR chooses_VVZ the_AT banana_NN1 !_! "_" 
</s>
<s>
How_RGQ many_DA2 such_DA errors_NN2 did_VDD the_AT psychiatrists_NN2 make_VVI ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT birth_NN1 cohort_NN1 centered_VVD on_II the_AT mean_JJ (_( 1981_MC )_) was_VBDZ a_AT1 significant_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO the_AT intercept_VV0 for_IF 9_MC of_IO the_AT 12_MC YGPI_JJ scales_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD hypothesis_NN1 stated_VVD that_CST global_JJ processing_NN1 would_VM improve_VVI multitasking_VVG performance_NN1 via_II efficient_JJ cognitive_JJ functioning_NN1 and_CC broadened_VVN visual_JJ attention_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 reasonable_JJ but_CCB speculative_JJ expectation_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST when_CS compared_VVN to_II other_JJ parental_JJ behaviors_NN2 ,_, mind-mindedness_NN1 will_VM fare_VVI better_RRR in_II the_AT prediction_NN1 of_IO some_DD child_NN1 outcomes_NN2 than_CSN others_NN2 ;_; such_DA results_NN2 would_VM provide_VVI important_JJ directions_NN2 for_IF future_JJ research_NN1 and_CC intervention_NN1 programs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
See_VV0 Figure_NN1 3_MC for_IF study_NN1 timeline_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR those_DD2 eligible_JJ to_TO pay_VVI tax_NN1 based_VVN on_II their_APPGE responses_NN2 in_II the_AT FS_NP2 were_VBDR included_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA we_PPIS2 explained_VVD above_RL ,_, this_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT telltale_NN1 sign_NN1 of_IO reaction_NN1 to_II missed_JJ opportunities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE results_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST one_MC1 method_NN1 available_JJ to_II teachers_NN2 is_VBZ their_APPGE own_DA learning_NN1 history_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 key_JJ conclusion_NN1 from_II symbolic_JJ self-completion_JJ theory_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST people_NN can_VM cope_VVI with_IW self-discrepancy_NN1 by_II engaging_VVG in_II behaviors_NN2 that_CST signal_VV0 symbolic_JJ mastery_NN1 on_II the_AT dimension_NN1 of_IO the_AT self-discrepancy_NN1 (_( Rucker_NP1 &;_NULL Galinsky_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 opportunities_NN2 for_IF having_VHG such_DA new_JJ experiences_NN2 are_VBR missed_VVN by_II having_VHG the_AT analyst_NN1 as_II a_AT1 passive_JJ observer_NN1 (_( Goldberger_NP1 1995_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Based_VVN on_II the_AT articles_NN2 in_II this_DD1 special_JJ issue_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 identify_VV0 three_MC particular_JJ streams_NN2 of_IO investigation_NN1 related_VVN to_II the_AT framework_NN1 above_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD finding_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_DD1 elaboration_NN1 ,_, perhaps_RR through_II the_AT engagement_NN1 of_IO enriched_JJ cognitive_JJ operations_NN2 ,_, may_VM not_XX completely_RR explain_VVI the_AT survival_NN1 advantage_NN1 frequently_RR found_VVN in_II recall_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE work_NN1 thus_RR far_RR has_VHZ been_VBN conducted_VVN exclusively_RR in_II democratic_JJ ,_, liberal_JJ and_CC mostly_RR Western_JJ societies_NN2 where_RRQ freedom_NN1 of_IO expression_NN1 and_CC the_AT right_NN1 to_II peaceful_JJ protest_NN1 are_VBR crucial_JJ and_CC protected_VVN by_II law_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II order_NN1 to_II better_JJR address_NN1 the_AT stated_JJ hypotheses_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 applied_VVD the_AT SEM_NN1 strategy_NN1 to_II our_APPGE data_NN analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT numbing_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO mortality_NN1 salience_NN1 was_VBDZ examined_VVN across_II a_AT1 variety_NN1 of_IO situations_NN2 involving_VVG labadministered_JJ consumption_NN1 experiences_NN2 (_( Studies_NN2 1_MC1 ,_, 3_MC ,_, and_CC 4_MC )_) ,_, revisiting_VVG a_AT1 nostalgic_JJ memory_NN1 (_( Study_NN1 2_MC )_) ,_, and_CC viewing_VVG inmarket_NN1 advertisements_NN2 (_( Study_NN1 5_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Collective_JJ strategic_JJ vision_NN1 was_VBDZ measured_VVN using_VVG an_AT1 adapted_JJ version_NN1 of_IO the_AT 7-item_JJ strategic_JJ vision_NN1 and_CC articulation_NN1 scale_NN1 from_II the_AT C-K_NN1 measure_NN1 of_IO charismatic_JJ leadership_NN1 (_( Conger_NP1 &;_NULL Kanungo_NP1 ,_, 1994_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Children_NN2 were_VBDR eligible_JJ for_IF inclusion_NN1 if_CS their_APPGE parents_NN2 reported_VVD no_AT developmental_JJ concerns_NN2 or_CC disorders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Progressive_JJ atrophy_NN1 in_II lesion_NN1 models_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO HC_NP1 atrophy_NN1 in_II later_JJR stages_NN2 of_IO SD_NP1 (_( Maguire_NP1 ,_, Kumaran_NP1 ,_, Hassabis_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Kopelman_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Matuszewski_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, and_CC of_IO progressive_JJ ATL_NN1 atrophy_NN1 in_II AD_RA (_( Domoto-Reilly_NP1 ,_, Sapolsky_NP1 ,_, Brickhouse_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Dickerson_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, makes_VVZ inferences_NN2 about_II specific_JJ structures_NN2 ,_, and_CC their_APPGE association_NN1 with_IW different_JJ AM_RA components_NN2 ,_, challenging_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consistently_RR ,_, blame_VV0 attributions_NN2 were_VBDR found_VVN to_TO be_VBI more_RRR affected_VVN by_II personal_JJ beliefs_NN2 than_CSN situational-specific_JJ variables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT more_RGR pronounced_JJ negative_JJ correlation_NN1 of_IO the_AT ERN/Ne_FU with_IW anxious_JJ apprehension/worry_NN1 as_CSA compared_VVN to_II the_AT correlation_NN1 of_IO the_AT ERN/Ne_FU with_IW mixed_JJ trait-anxiety_NN1 indicates_VVZ that_CST worry_VV0 is_VBZ related_VVN to_II the_AT ERN/Ne_FU ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX was_VBDZ some_DD evidence_NN1 that_CST measurement_NN1 intercept_VV0 differences_NN2 translated_VVN into_II observed_JJ intercept_VV0 differences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, participants_NN2 were_VBDR given_VVN a_AT1 validation_NN1 code_NN1 at_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE 5-min_JJ survey_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX observe_VVI a_AT1 priming_NN1 effect_NN1 between_II plurals_NN2 and_CC other_JJ EVAs_NP2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ study_NN1 focuses_VVZ on_II the_AT role_NN1 of_IO knowledge_NN1 of_IO connectives_NN2 in_II understanding_VVG expository_JJ texts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 4_MC shows_VVZ that_CST the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II nature–nurture_NN1 beliefs_NN2 and_CC mindset_NN1 was_VBDZ significant_JJ and_CC moderately_RR strong_JJ (_( r_ZZ1 =_FO .501_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.01_MC )_) ;_; having_VHG a_AT1 belief_NN1 that_CST genes_NN2 exert_VV0 more_DAR influence_NN1 than_CSN environment_NN1 on_II cognitive_JJ ability_NN1 was_VBDZ associated_VVN with_IW having_VHG a_AT1 more_RGR fixed_JJ mindset_NN1 (_( all_DB environment_NN1 =_FO 1_MC1 ,_, all_DB genes_NN2 =_FO 5_MC ;_; fixed_JJ mindset=1_FO ,_, growth_NN1 mindset=6_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 tendency_NN1 is_VBZ maximized_VVN for_IF consumers_NN2 with_IW high_JJ involvement_NN1 given_CS21 that_CS22 highly_RR involved_VVN participants_NN2 showed_VVD more_RGR favorable_JJ implicit_JJ and_CC explicit_JJ attitudes_NN2 toward_II athletes_NN2 in_II the_AT low_JJ fit_JJ condition_NN1 compared_VVN to_II the_AT high_JJ fit_JJ condition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 significant_JJ predictor_NN1 (_( β_NULL =_FO 0.59_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.01_MC )_) ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST the_AT focus_NN1 on_II short-term_JJ profitability_NN1 and_CC maximization_NN1 of_IO price_NN1 may_VM be_VBI motivating_VVG the_AT use_NN1 of_IO financial_JJ tools_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, our_APPGE main_JJ goal_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO examine_VVI ToM_NP1 as_II a_AT1 prospective_JJ longitudinal_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO reciprocated_JJ friendship_NN1 versus_II friendlessness_NN1 in_II the_AT early_JJ years_NNT2 of_IO primary_JJ school_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Subjects_NN2 in_II our_APPGE experiment_NN1 first_MD play_VV0 a_AT1 repeated_JJ Trust_NN1 Game_NN1 to_TO create_VVI social_JJ histories_NN2 in_II the_AT laboratory_NN1 ,_, before_II engaging_VVG in_II a_AT1 Common_JJ Resource_NN1 Game_NN1 ,_, to_TO measure_VVI deviant_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Though_CS the_AT skin_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 2D_NNU sheet_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 envelops_VVZ the_AT 2D_NNU volume_NN1 of_IO the_AT body_NN1 ,_, whatever_DDQV its_APPGE posture_NN1 in_II external_JJ space_NN1 might_VM be_VBI ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 sensitivity_NN1 is_VBZ reflected_VVN in_II how_RRQ they_PPHS2 structure_VV0 their_APPGE utterances_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT SigSub_NP1 condition_NN1 was_VBDZ the_AT same_DA as_CSA the_AT SigBoth_NN1 condition_NN1 ,_, except_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT terminallink_NN1 stimuli_NN2 presented_VVN on_II the_AT optimal_JJ alternative_NN1 could_VM precede_VVI either_DD1 outcome_NN1 type_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT key_JJ role_NN1 leader_NN1 identity_NN1 appears_VVZ to_TO play_VVI in_II relational_JJ processes_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 leadership_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 strongly_RR encourage_VV0 future_JJ empirical_JJ research_NN1 on_II leader_NN1 identity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW our_APPGE repeated_JJ sender-receiver_JJ game_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 seek_VV0 to_TO answer_VVI the_AT question_NN1 whether_CSW reputation_NN1 through_II reporting_VVG systems_NN2 is_VBZ able_JK to_TO reduce_VVI deceptive_JJ behavior_NN1 over_II time_NNT1 compared_VVN to_II a_AT1 setting_NN1 in_II which_DDQ only_RR bilateral_JJ reputation_NN1 building_NN1 is_VBZ possible_JJ among_II the_AT players_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Race_NN1 ,_, sex_NN1 ,_, and_CC age_NN1 were_VBDR crossed_VVN with_IW political_JJ party_NN1 (_( in_II the_AT partisan_JJ conditions_NN2 )_) or_CC with_IW button_NN1 color_NN1 (_( in_II the_AT non-partisan_JJ condition_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT temporal-organization_JJ hypothesis_NN1 also_RR fits_VVZ naturally_RR with_IW the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO learning_VVG by_II contiguity_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ dates_VVZ back_RP at_RR21 least_RR22 to_II Aristotle_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Particularism_NN1 can_VM limit_VVI organizational_JJ institutionalization_NN1 because_CS it_PPH1 denies_VVZ the_AT emergence_NN1 of_IO objectivity_NN1 and_CC neutrality_NN1 and_CC ,_, as_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ,_, supervisors_NN2 '_NULL duties_NN2 are_VBR unclear_JJ and_CC ill-defined_NN1 (_( Redding_NP1 ,_, 1990_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Client_NN1 metaphors_NN2 are_VBR rich_JJ with_IW personal_JJ meaning_NN1 and_CC working_VVG to_TO develop_VVI them_PPHO2 may_VM prove_VVI to_TO be_VBI beneficial_JJ for_IF outcome_NN1 ,_, possibly_RR through_II helping_VVG people_NN feel_VVI fully_RR understood_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR recently_RR have_VH0 researchers_NN2 directly_RR examined_VVN whether_CSW the_AT negative_JJ association_NN1 between_II intergroup_JJ contact_NN1 and_CC prejudice_NN1 depends_VVZ on_II people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 levels_NN2 of_IO "_" prejudice-proneness_JJ "_" as_CSA indicated_VVN by_II constructs_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 SDO_NP1 ,_, RWA_NP1 ,_, and_CC NFC_NP1 (_( Hodson_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Studies_NN2 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC exclusively_RR investigated_VVN how_RRQ power_NN1 affects_VVZ evaluations_NN2 of_IO luxury_JJ brands_NN2 '_NULL CSR_NP1 activities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II their_APPGE unconscious_JJ ,_, Jews_NN2 symbolize_VV0 the_AT anti-Semite_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 repressed_JJ instincts_NN2 &lsqb;_( such_II21 as_II22 aggressiveness_NN1 &rsqb;_) as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 traits_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 strangeness_NN1 ,_, wickedness_NN1 ,_, and_CC ugliness_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ they_PPHS2 despise_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 are_VBR each_DD1 discussed_VVN below_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 work_NN1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN in_RR21 part_RR22 by_II NIH_NP1 Grant_NP1 Nos_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, despite_II the_AT n_ZZ1 -_- 1_MC1 shift_NN1 cost_NN1 measures_VVZ inhibitory_JJ control_NN1 processes_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 reflects_VVZ also_RR the_AT efficiency_NN1 of_IO other_JJ EC_NP1 mechanisms_NN2 involved_JJ in_II switching_VVG between_II tasks_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, task-set_JJ activation_NN1 mechanisms_NN2 ;_; see_VV0 Kiesel_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Emphasising_VVG subjectivity_NN1 and_CC prioritising_VVG the_AT clients_NN2 '_NULL process_NN1 of_IO meaning-making_NN1 ,_, narrative_JJ career_NN1 counselling_NN1 aims_VVZ to_TO enhance_VVI contextual_JJ selfunderstanding_NN1 through_II facilitating_VVG self-reflection_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Adjusted_JJ significance_NN1 values_NN2 were_VBDR interpreted_VVN to_TO account_VVI for_IF multiple_JJ comparisons_NN2 across_II the_AT three_MC participant_NN1 groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 used_VVD the_AT model_NN1 to_TO produce_VVI scenarios_NN2 to_TO identify_VVI dynamic_JJ patterns_NN2 related_VVN to_II syndemic_JJ risk_NN1 among_II urban_JJ women_NN2 with_IW and_CC at-risk_NN1 for_IF HIV_NP1 to_TO reach_VVI these_DD2 goals_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT EEG_NN1 effect_NN1 in_II Piai_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2014_MC )_) seems_VVZ to_TO have_VHI a_AT1 broader_JJR scalp_NN1 distribution_NN1 than_CSN the_AT effect_NN1 in_II the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Overall_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 suggest_VV0 that_DD1 therapy_NN1 can_VM improve_VVI word-finding_JJ abilities_NN2 in_II children_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT third_MD hypothesis_NN1 ,_, that_CST the_AT incidence_NN1 of_IO recognition_NN1 without_IW awareness_NN1 is_VBZ restricted_VVN to_II conditions_NN2 of_IO conservative_NN1 responding_VVG (_( Starns_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ,_, is_VBZ difficult_JJ to_TO assess_VVI from_II these_DD2 data_NN ;_; consideration_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 possibility_NN1 is_VBZ deferred_JJ until_CS the_AT final_JJ experiment_NN1 is_VBZ described_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT remaining_JJ 47_MC subthemes_NN2 were_VBDR then_RT inductively_RR collapsed_VVN into_II 9_MC overarching_JJ themes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF eight_MC participants_NN2 (_( all_DB except_II BJ_NP1 )_) ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR observed_VVN significant_JJ Target_NN1 Top_NN1 *Target_FO Bottom_JJ interactions_NN2 ,_, at_II p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ,_, likely_RR driven_VVN by_II the_AT very_RG slow_JJ responses_NN2 on_II the_AT no-target_JJ trials_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT trial_NN1 structure_NN1 is_VBZ shown_VVN in_II Fig._NN1 5_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT work_NN1 presented_VVD here_RL indicates_VVZ that_CST appraisals_NN2 of_IO injustice_NN1 predict_VV0 contempt_NN1 ,_, but_CCB they_PPHS2 also_RR (_( and_CC even_RR more_RGR strongly_RR )_) predict_VV0 anger_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ possible_JJ that_CST the_AT expectation_NN1 of_IO pain_NN1 also_RR reflects_VVZ fears_NN2 and_CC worries_NN2 about_II whether_CSW pain_NN1 medication_NN1 will_VM relieve_VVI postsurgical_JJ pain_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT extent_NN1 to_II which_DDQ this_DD1 truncation_NN1 underestimates_VVZ true_JJ SES-gradients_NN2 in_II lifespan_NN1 variation_NN1 is_VBZ unknown_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 strong_JJ agreement_NN1 about_II whether_CSW an_AT1 event_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, a_AT1 hurricane_NN1 )_) is_VBZ rapid_JJ versus_II slow_JJ ,_, the_AT distribution_NN1 of_IO p_ZZ1 can_VM have_VHI a_AT1 small_JJ variance_NN1 in_CS21 that_CS22 most_DAT people_NN agree_VV0 with_IW the_AT speed_NN1 of_IO the_AT event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Static_JJ gestures_NN2 referred_VVD either_RR to_II objects_NN2 or_CC to_II locations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Fig._NN1 2_MC shows_VVZ the_AT data_NN for_IF Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Comparing_VVG among_II the_AT experimental_JJ conditions_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 smaller_JJR stressor_NN1 response_NN1 in_II factor_NN1 1_MC1 of_IO the_AT QSU_NN1 was_VBDZ observed_VVN in_II Condition_NN1 B_NP1 than_CSN in_II either_RR Condition_NN1 D_ZZ1 or_CC E_ZZ1 (_( both_RR p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.01_MC )_) and_CC in_II Condition_NN1 C_ZZ1 compared_VVN to_II Condition_NN1 E_ZZ1 (_( p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.01_MC )_) (_( Table_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
During_II the_AT second_MD visit_NN1 ,_, children_NN2 and_CC parents_NN2 engaged_VVN in_II a_AT1 series_NN of_IO laboratory_NN1 tasks_NN2 ,_, including_II a_AT1 measure_NN1 of_IO the_AT ESCS_NN2 (_( Mundy_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC )_) adapted_VVD to_TO assess_VVI joint_JJ attention_NN1 in_II higher_JJR functioning_NN1 and_CC older_JJR children_NN2 (_( see_VV0 Jahromi_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ was_VBDZ videotaped_VVN for_IF subsequent_JJ coding_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, complexity_NN1 could_VM be_VBI the_AT result_NN1 of_IO differences_NN2 in_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO awareness_NN1 or_CC different_JJ team_NN1 members_NN2 or_CC differences_NN2 in_II thought_NN1 processes_NN2 or_CC reasoning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, in_II phase_NN1 2_MC of_IO data_NN collection_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 asked_VVD participants_NN2 at_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO the_AT interview_NN1 to_TO reflect_VVI on_II any_DD changes_NN2 in_II beliefs_NN2 between_II phases_NN2 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ necessary_JJ to_TO repeatedly_RR collect_VVI AAI_NP1 data_NN across_II the_AT transition_NN1 from_II adolescence_NN1 and_CC adulthood_NN1 in_II a_AT1 sample_NN1 with_IW prospective_JJ information_NN1 regarding_II childhood_NN1 experiences_NN2 of_IO abuse_NN1 and_CC neglect_VV0 in_II order_NN1 to_TO rigorously_RR evaluate_VVI whether_CSW the_AT predictive_JJ significance_NN1 of_IO childhood_NN1 abuse_NN1 and_CC neglect_VV0 for_IF individuals_NN2 '_NULL dismissing_VVG AAI_NP1 states_NN2 of_IO mind_NN1 in_RR21 particular_RR22 might_VM fade_VVI over_RP this_DD1 transitional_JJ developmental_JJ period_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 have_VH0 no_AT indications_NN2 that_CST such_DA adaptations_NN2 suggest_VV0 actual_JJ changes_NN2 in_II the_AT interests_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT author_NN1 thanks_NN2 Jay_NP1 McClelland_NP1 for_IF his_APPGE assistance_NN1 with_IW this_DD1 project_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ reflected_VVN in_II overall_JJ reduction_NN1 of_IO model_NN1 fit_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 different_JJ constellation_NN1 of_IO WM_NP1 regions_NN2 associated_VVN with_IW performance_NN1 in_II patients_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Approximately_RR 98%_NNU of_IO participants_NN2 '_NULL responses_NN2 were_VBDR represented_VVN by_II one_MC1 or_CC both_DB2 of_IO these_DD2 categories_NN2 ,_, with_IW 14%_NNU of_IO participants_NN2 '_NULL strategies_NN2 being_VBG classified_VVN as_CSA strictly_RR "_" cognitive_JJ ,_, "_" 55%_NNU of_IO participants_NN2 '_NULL strategies_NN2 being_VBG classified_VVN as_CSA strictly_RR "_" behavioral_JJ ,_, "_" and_CC 29%_NNU of_IO participants_NN2 '_NULL strategies_NN2 containing_VVG both_RR cognitive_JJ and_CC behavioral_JJ elements_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Leekam_VV0 ,_, Prior_RR ,_, and_CC Uljarevic_NN1 (_( 2011_MC )_) argued_VVD that_CST sensory_JJ overload_NN1 could_VM trigger_VVI RRBs_NP1 due_II21 to_II22 increased_JJ arousal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 3_MC shows_VVZ the_AT estimation_NN1 using_VVG the_AT logit_NN1 method_NN1 for_IF each_DD1 sample_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, in_II cultures_NN2 where_RRQ kissing_NN1 is_VBZ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT romantic-sexual_JJ repertoire_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ an_AT1 important_JJ part_NN1 of_IO arousal_NN1 and_CC sustaining_VVG feelings_NN2 of_IO closeness_NN1 before_RT ,_, during_II ,_, and_CC after_II sex_NN1 acts_NN2 (_( Jankowiak_NP1 ,_, Volshe_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Garcia_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ is_VBZ unclear_JJ ,_, however_RR ,_, is_VBZ why_RRQ this_DD1 relationship_NN1 emerges_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Data_NN regarding_II history_NN1 of_IO physical_JJ violence_NN1 between_II victim_NN1 and_CC offender_NN1 in_II IPH_NP1 cases_NN2 (_( onwards_RR referred_VVN to_II as_CSA history_NN1 of_IO IPV_NP1 )_) is_VBZ based_VVN on_II prior_JJ reports_NN2 to_II the_AT police_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ are_VBR eliminated_VVN after_II five_MC years_NNT2 ,_, in_II other_JJ words_NN2 the_AT figures_NN2 regarding_II history_NN1 of_IO IPV_NP1 are_VBR conservative_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Findings_NN2 from_II the_AT meta-analysis_NN1 also_RR have_VH0 practical_JJ implications_NN2 for_IF human_JJ resource/personnel_FU systems_NN2 in_II organizations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Whereas_CS IAcc_NP1 scores_NN2 are_VBR meant_VVN to_TO reflect_VVI people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 level_NN1 of_IO interoceptive_JJ accuracy_NN1 ,_, irrespective_II21 of_II22 error_NN1 type_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 scores_NN2 essentially_RR index_VV0 under-reporting_NN1 ,_, found_VVN in_II 95%_NNU of_IO the_AT participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_RR more_RGR problematic_JJ is_VBZ the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST the_AT innocent_JJ suspects_NN2 exhibited_VVD little_DA1 awareness_NN1 of_IO whether_CSW their_APPGE corroborator_NN1 would_VM recognize_VVI them_PPHO2 ,_, overestimating_VVG the_AT likelihood_NN1 that_CST they_PPHS2 would_VM be_VBI recognized_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 allows_VVZ for_IF a_AT1 within-item_JJ design_NN1 ,_, where_CS the_AT same_DA words_NN2 can_VM be_VBI presented_VVN with_IW and_CC without_IW diacritics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL we_PPIS2 used_VVD a_AT1 generalized_JJ form_NN1 of_IO PPI_NP1 ,_, which_DDQ allows_VVZ for_IF comparisons_NN2 across_II the_AT complete_JJ design_NN1 space_NN1 (_( McLaren_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT beginning_NN1 of_IO the_AT experiment_NN1 ,_, participants_NN2 practice_NN1 this_DD1 procedure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT assignment_NN1 of_IO cVPT_NNU and_CC rVPT_NNU to_II the_AT '_NULL A_ZZ1 '_NULL or_CC '_NULL B_ZZ1 '_NULL positions_NN2 was_VBDZ randomized_VVN over_II participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 suggest_VV0 that_CST left_JJ caudate_NN1 might_VM also_RR be_VBI involved_JJ in_II producing_VVG motion_NN1 verbs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA technology_NN1 has_VHZ progressed_VVN ,_, an_AT1 increasing_JJ number_NN1 of_IO studies_NN2 have_VH0 examined_VVN the_AT efficacy_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 modality_NN1 compared_VVN to_II in-person_JJ intervention_NN1 and_CC assessment_NN1 of_IO mental_JJ and_CC behavioral_JJ health_NN1 concerns_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Based_VVN on_II the_AT description_NN1 of_IO the_AT item_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 performed_VVD online_JJ searches_NN2 using_VVG manufacturers_NN2 '_NULL websites_NN2 ,_, other_JJ nutrition_NN1 web_NN1 sources_NN2 (_( such_II21 as_II22 FoodFacts.com_NP1 )_) ,_, or_CC as_II a_AT1 final_JJ resort_NN1 ,_, the_AT USDA_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 nutrient_JJ database_NN1 if_CS the_AT item_NN1 was_VBDZ missing_JJ manufacturer_NN1 or_CC brand_NN1 information_NN1 (_( eg_REX ,_, a_AT1 generic_JJ chocolate_NN1 chip_NN1 cookie_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II fact_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, this_DD1 emphasis_NN1 on_II the_AT power_NN1 of_IO interpersonal_JJ expectancies_NN2 was_VBDZ unjustified_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO provide_VVI a_AT1 more_RGR comprehensive_JJ view_NN1 of_IO ingratiation_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE consequences_NN2 ,_, theories_NN2 of_IO impression_NN1 management_NN1 should_VM account_VVI for_IF multiple_JJ levels_NN2 in_II which_DDQ the_AT focal_JJ actor_NN1 is_VBZ embedded_VVN ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 multiple_JJ audiences_NN2 that_CST exist_VV0 across_II different_JJ hierarchical_JJ levels_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT scheme_NN1 of_IO animal_NN1 sample_NN1 collection_NN1 was_VBDZ shown_VVN in_II Supplementary_JJ Material_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 are_VBR the_AT first_MD to_TO apply_VVI the_AT expertise_NN1 paradigm_NN1 to_II criminal_JJ behavior_NN1 ,_, and_CC to_TO test_VVI it_PPH1 among_II a_AT1 substantial_JJ sample_NN1 of_IO experienced_JJ burglars_NN2 ,_, as_RG well_RR as_CSA to_TO compare_VVI their_APPGE behavior_NN1 with_IW the_AT behavior_NN1 of_IO two_MC relevant_JJ comparison_NN1 groups_NN2 ,_, offenders_NN2 with_IW no_AT burglary_NN1 experience_NN1 (_( henceforth_RT "_" other_JJ offenders_NN2 "_" )_) and_CC nonoffending_VVG community_NN1 participants_NN2 (_( henceforth_RT "_" nonoffenders_VVZ "_" )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 address_VV0 this_DD1 concern_NN1 in_II two_MC ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Empirical_JJ and_CC even_RR theoretical_JJ consideration_NN1 for_IF the_AT role_NN1 of_IO CYIC_NN1 on_II continued_JJ offending_NN1 in_II adulthood_NN1 is_VBZ lacking_VVG despite_II obvious_JJ parallels_NN2 between_II foster_JJ care_NN1 placement_NN1 and_CC ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, age-based_JJ theories_NN2 of_IO informal_JJ social_JJ control_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Sampson_NP1 &;_NULL Laub_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG the_AT literature_NN1 ,_, factors_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 were_VBDR selected_VVN based_VVN on_II visual_JJ inspection_NN1 of_IO the_AT timing_NN1 and_CC topography_NN1 of_IO the_AT output_NN1 (_( Dien_NP1 ,_, Spencer_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Donchin_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Spencer_NP1 ,_, Dien_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Donchin_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 reported_VVD that_CST negative_JJ feedback_NN1 was_VBDZ exchanged_VVN less_RGR frequently_RR than_CSN positive_JJ feedback_NN1 ,_, and_CC that_DD1 negative_JJ feedback_NN1 they_PPHS2 received_VVD was_VBDZ more_RGR often_RR novel_JJ to_II them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Details_NN2 of_IO the_AT procedures_NN2 used_VVN in_II each_DD1 analysis_NN1 are_VBR provided_VVN below_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Product_NN1 adoption_NN1 as_II a_AT1 function_NN1 of_IO intervention_NN1 design_NN1 and_CC personal_JJ innovativeness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Instead_RR ,_, Grade_VV0 1_MC1 s_ZZ1 were_VBDR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO refer_VVI to_II their_APPGE scripts_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, choosing_VVG a_AT1 script_NN1 component_NN1 such_II21 as_II22 '_NULL doing_VDG the_AT puzzles_NN2 '_NULL )_) than_CSN expected_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II first_MD glance_NN1 ,_, the_AT benefit_NN1 of_IO retrocueing_NN1 appears_VVZ paradoxical_JJ :_: memory_NN1 is_VBZ seemingly_RR improved_VVN out_II21 of_II22 thin_JJ air_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 confusion_NN1 of_IO the_AT 2_MC effects_NN2 is_VBZ possible_JJ because_CS in_II achievement_NN1 measures_VVZ the_AT items_NN2 are_VBR arranged_VVN according_II21 to_II22 their_APPGE difficulty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Parents_NN2 of_IO the_AT adolescent_NN1 and_CC best_JJT friend_NN1 received_VVD a_AT1 thorough_JJ description_NN1 of_IO the_AT study_NN1 and_CC were_VBDR informed_VVN that_CST their_APPGE data_NN would_VM be_VBI treated_VVN with_IW confidentiality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT group_NN1 level_NN1 ,_, societies_NN2 that_CST are_VBR more_RGR religious_JJ have_VH0 higher_JJR population_NN1 replacement_NN1 levels_NN2 than_CSN secular_JJ societies_NN2 ,_, even_CS21 when_CS22 countries_NN2 are_VBR matched_VVN on_II national_JJ income_NN1 and_CC education_NN1 levels_NN2 (_( Norris_NP1 &;_NULL Inglehart_NP1 2004_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS round_JJ robin_NN1 data_NN can_VM typically_RR be_VBI examined_VVN using_VVG the_AT Social_JJ Relations_NN2 Model_NN1 (_( SRM_NP1 ;_; Back_NN1 and_CC Kenny_NP1 2010_MC )_) ,_, this_DD1 technique_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX suitable_JJ for_IF our_APPGE research_NN1 purposes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT number_NN1 of_IO narcissists_VVZ on_II a_AT1 team_NN1 has_VHZ an_AT1 inverted_JJ U-shaped_JJ relationship_NN1 with_IW team_NN1 creative_JJ performance_NN1 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 having_VHG more_DAR narcissists_VVZ is_VBZ better_JJR for_IF generating_VVG creative_JJ outcomes_NN2 up_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 point_NN1 ,_, after_II which_DDQ too_RG many_DA2 narcissists_VVZ becomes_VVZ detrimental_JJ (_( perhaps_RR because_CS they_PPHS2 cause_VV0 distracting_VVG conflict_NN1 ;_; Goncalo_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, the_AT relatively_RR high_JJ confidence_NN1 levels_NN2 are_VBR unwarranted_JJ by_II the_AT proportions_NN2 actually_RR correct_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, given_VVN these_DD2 provocative_JJ results_NN2 ,_, an_AT1 important_JJ question_NN1 for_IF future_JJ research_NN1 is_VBZ what_DDQ factors_NN2 might_VM underlie_VVI the_AT apparent_JJ special_JJ value_NN1 and_CC memorability_NN1 of_IO the_AT level-2_MC explanations_NN2 ,_, for_IF children_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Accordingly_RR ,_, deficits_NN2 in_II joint_JJ attention_NN1 may_VM point_VVI toward_II a_AT1 weak_JJ shared_JJ attention_NN1 mechanism_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ may_VM interfere_VVI with_IW children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ability_NN1 to_TO take_VVI the_AT perspective_NN1 of_IO another_DD1 person_NN1 during_II social_JJ interactions_NN2 (_( Mundy_NP1 &;_NULL Newell_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Mundy_NP1 ,_, Sigman_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Kasari_NP1 ,_, 1994_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hardy_NP1 believed_VVD emphatically_RR in_II the_AT precise_JJ aesthetics_NN1 of_IO math_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, if_CS search_NN1 activity_NN1 alone_RR ,_, regardless_RR of_IO search_NN1 success_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ driving_VVG the_AT inflation_NN1 of_IO self-assessed_JJ knowledge_NN1 ,_, then_RT participants_NN2 who_PNQS search_VV0 unsuccessfully_RR will_VM rate_VVI themselves_PPX2 higher_RRR than_CSN participants_NN2 in_II the_AT no_NN1 Internet_NN1 conditions_NN2 from_II previous_JJ experiments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 vacation_NN1 requires_VVZ time_NNT1 off_RP from_II work_NN1 ;_; enjoying_VVG a_AT1 new_JJ computer_NN1 or_CC new_JJ car_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 manifests_VVZ itself_PPX1 in_II consumers_NN2 '_NULL seeking_VVG and_CC deriving_VVG gratifications_NN2 from_II owning_VVG and_CC consuming_VVG clothing_NN1 and_CC in_II their_APPGE motivation_NN1 to_TO expend_VVI time_NNT1 and_CC money_NN1 to_TO acquire_VVI and_CC consume_VVI more_DAR of_IO it_PPH1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT average_JJ prize_NN1 was_VBDZ constant_JJ over_II rounds_NN2 ,_, this_DD1 increase_NN1 in_II effort_NN1 is_VBZ interpreted_VVN as_II a_AT1 learning-by-doing_VDG effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ the_AT F0_FO variability_NN1 of_IO the_AT voice_NN1 ,_, not_XX the_AT F0_FO mean_VV0 ,_, that_DD1 has_VHZ been_VBN found_VVN to_TO be_VBI the_AT main_JJ factor_NN1 that_CST differentiates_VVZ the_AT prototypical_JJ IDS_NN2 of_IO mothers_NN2 with_IW the_AT IDS_NN2 of_IO depressed_JJ mothers_NN2 (_( Kaplan_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD ,_, within_II the_AT 30-minutes_NNT2 to_II resolution_NN1 condition_NN1 we_PPIS2 compared_VVD t1_FO and_CC t2_FO with_IW paired-sample_JJ t-tests_NN2 (_( Table_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Stability_NN1 was_VBDZ large_JJ across_II all_DB data_NN collection_NN1 waves_NN2 on_II all_DB four_MC EAS_NP2 scales_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Differences_NN2 between_II victims_NN2 and_CC non-victims_NN2 in_II antecedents_NN2 and_CC outcomes_NN2 of_IO defending_NN1 were_VBDR tested_VVN in_II separate_JJ models_NN2 which_DDQ included_VVD interaction_NN1 effects_NN2 between_II respectively_RR :_: empathy_NN1 and_CC victim_NN1 status_NN1 ,_, self-efficacy_JJ and_CC victim_NN1 status_NN1 ,_, and_CC defending_NN1 and_CC victim_NN1 status_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 task_NN1 is_VBZ also_RR similar_JJ in_II nature_NN1 to_II duration_NN1 reproductions_NN2 and_CC episodic_JJ simulations_NN2 used_VVN in_II time_NNT1 and_CC memory_NN1 research_NN1 respectively_RR (_( Addis_NP1 and_CC Schacter_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ,_, Grondin_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC ,_, Schacter_NP1 and_CC Addis_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, following_VVG the_AT active_JJ inference_NN1 literature_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 suggest_VV0 that_CST the_AT depressive_NN1 response_NN1 becomes_VVZ maladaptive_JJ when_CS there_EX are_VBR (_( neuromodulatory_JJ )_) failures_NN2 of_IO '_NULL precision-engineered_JJ '_NULL visceromotor_NN1 inference_NN1 -_- produced_VVN ,_, for_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, by_II sustained_JJ social_JJ distress_NN1 -_- leading_VVG to_II illness_NN1 behaviours_NN2 that_CST fail_VV0 to_TO respond_VVI to_II improvements_NN2 in_II interpersonal_JJ contexts_NN2 and_CC can_VM often_RR exacerbate_VVI socioenvironmental_JJ stress_NN1 &lsqb;_( 13,14_MC &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 tested_VVD this_DD1 hypothesis_NN1 in_II Study_NN1 3_MC by_II ensuring_VVG that_CST the_AT experimenter_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 method_NN1 was_VBDZ just_RR as_RG simple_JJ as_CSA the_AT method_NN1 children_NN2 discovered_VVD for_IF themselves_PPX2 even_CS21 if_CS22 it_PPH1 was_VBDZ more_RGR opaque_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, univariable_JJ analyses_NN2 were_VBDR conducted_VVN within_II each_DD1 of_IO the_AT three_MC domains_NN2 (_( housing_NN1 and_CC residential_JJ ,_, neighborhood_NN1 ,_, and_CC community_NN1 factors_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
EV_NN1 and_CC SJ_NP1 scored_VVD 1.00_MC (_( at_II ceiling_NN1 )_) on_II the_AT inflection_NN1 index_NN1 ,_, yet_RR showed_VVD large_JJ attraction_NN1 effects_NN2 that_CST were_VBDR at_RR21 least_RR22 as_RG large_JJ as_CSA those_DD2 shown_VVN by_II BB_NP1 ,_, who_PNQS had_VHD a_AT1 lower_JJR inflection_NN1 index_NN1 score_NN1 (_( although_CS note_NN1 that_CST his_APPGE score_NN1 of_IO .75_MC was_VBDZ still_RR within_II the_AT range_NN1 of_IO the_AT control_NN1 participants_NN2 reported_VVN by_II Rochon_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 found_VVD no_AT evidence_NN1 that_CST either_RR reconstruction_NN1 more_RGR generally_RR ,_, or_CC the_AT use_NN1 of_IO landmarks_NN2 more_RGR specifically_RR ,_, led_VVN to_II more_RGR accurate_JJ estimates_NN2 of_IO the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO the_AT past_JJ visit_NN1 than_CSN other_JJ methods_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, although_CS there_EX is_VBZ considerable_JJ research_NN1 on_II the_AT effectiveness_NN1 of_IO training_NN1 working_VVG memory_NN1 ,_, there_EX is_VBZ much_DA1 less_DAR work_NN1 on_II training_NN1 of_IO other_JJ EF_NN1 skills_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 shifting_NN1 ,_, even_CS21 though_CS22 the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO shifting_VVG for_IF outcomes_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 academic_JJ success_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN well_RR established_VVN (_( Homer_NP1 &;_NULL Plass_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Yeniad_NP1 ,_, Malda_NP1 ,_, Mesman_NP1 ,_, van_NP1 Ijzendoorn_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Pieper_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Lehto_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2003_MC )_) ,_, the_AT Matching_JJ Familiar_JJ Figure_NN1 Task_NN1 was_VBDZ found_VVN to_TO tap_VVI the_AT latent_JJ inhibition_NN1 factor_NN1 in_II a_AT1 sample_NN1 of_IO children_NN2 aged_II 8_MC to_II 13_MC years_NNT2 old_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 research_NN1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN by_II Swiss_JJ National_JJ Science_NN1 Foundation_NN1 Grants_VVZ nos_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sometimes_RT ,_, monetary_JJ rewards_NN2 even_RR backfire_VV0 and_CC produce_VV0 a_AT1 boomerang_NN1 effect_NN1 (_( Asensio_NP1 &;_NULL Delmas_NP2 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, if_CS abrings_NN2 bad_JJ news_NN1 concerning_II one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 evaluation_NN1 of_IO how_RRQ one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 life_NN1 is_VBZ going_VVG (_( e.g._REX ,_, poor_JJ teaching_NN1 ratings_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 failed_JJ grant_NN1 application_NN1 ,_, or_CC a_AT1 share_NN1 price_NN1 collapse_NN1 )_) and/or_CC makes_VVZ one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 life_NN1 make_VV0 less_DAR sense_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, one_PN1 learns_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 cherished_JJ story_NN1 about_II one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 childhood_NN1 is_VBZ ,_, in_II fact_NN1 ,_, probably_RR a_AT1 false_JJ memory_NN1 )_) ,_, then_RT one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 absolute_JJ utility_NN1 will_VM be_VBI reduced_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Grossman_NP1 and_CC Varnum_NP1 (_( 2015_MC )_) studied_VVD culturelevel_NN1 individualism_NN1 correlates_VVZ in_II the##_FO USA_NP1 including_II frequency_NN1 of_IO individualistic_JJ and_CC collectivistic_JJ words_NN2 computed_VVN with_IW the_AT Google_NN1 Books_NN2 Ngram_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Based_VVN on_II past_JJ empirical_JJ evidence_NN1 (_( Anderson_NP1 &;_NULL Fulton_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Budruk_NP1 &;_NULL Wilhelm_NP1 Stanis_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR hypothesized_VVD that_CST "_" push_VV0 "_" motivations_NN2 would_VM ,_, in_II turn_NN1 ,_, positively_RR influence_VV0 three_MC dimensions_NN2 of_IO place_NN1 attachment_NN1 whereas_CS the_AT "_" pull_NN1 "_" motivation_NN1 measuring_VVG escape_NN1 would_VM negatively_RR predict_VVI place_NN1 attachment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT full_JJ analysis_NN1 code_NN1 is_VBZ available_JJ in_II the_AT Supplementary_JJ material_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT invariance_NN1 assumption_NN1 for_IF the_AT u-parameter_NN1 for_IF utilitarian_JJ inclinations_NN2 claims_VVZ that_CST the_AT probability_NN1 of_IO responding_VVG "_" unacceptable_JJ "_" on_II utilitarian_JJ grounds_NN2 for_IF the_AT inclusion_NN1 scenarios_NN2 is_VBZ the_AT same_DA as_CSA the_AT probability_NN1 of_IO responding_VVG "_" acceptable_JJ "_" on_II utilitarian_JJ grounds_NN2 for_IF the_AT exclusion_NN1 scenarios_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ on_II the_AT face_NN1 of_IO it_PPH1 would_VM as_II a_AT1 minimum_NN1 require_VV0 careful_JJ pretesting_NN1 and_CC calibration_NN1 of_IO the_AT scenarios_NN2 employed_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 list_NN1 of_IO emotion_NN1 terms_NN2 was_VBDZ adapted_VVN from_II Mackie_NP1 ,_, Devos_NP1 ,_, and_CC Smith_NP1 (_( 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA stated_VVN in_II the_AT statistical_JJ report_NN1 of_IO the_AT GSE_NN1 -_- Gestore_NP1 Servizi_NP1 Energetici_NP1 ,_, the_AT national_JJ agency_NN1 that_CST manages_VVZ the_AT energy_NN1 services_NN2 ,_, Italy_NP1 ranked_VVD 4th_MD among_II the_AT EU_NP1 countries_NN2 in_II the_AT production_NN1 of_IO energy_NN1 from_II renewable_JJ sources_NN2 and_CC ,_, more_RGR specifically_RR ,_, it_PPH1 ranked_VVD 2nd_MD in_II the_AT world_NN1 for_IF the_AT PV_NN1 plant_NN1 capacity_NN1 nationwide_RL (_( see_VV0 GSE_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Complementary_JJ ,_, Rickard_NP1 (_( 1997_MC )_) has_VHZ shown_VVN that_CST improvements_NN2 in_II overall_JJ task_NN1 performance_NN1 may_VM reflect_VVI improvements_NN2 in_II two_MC or_CC more_RGR alternative_JJ methods_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Level_VV0 1_MC1 ,_, within-participant_JJ factors_NN2 explained_VVN 85.5%_FO of_IO the_AT variance_NN1 in_II overall_JJ feeling_NN1 states_NN2 ,_, with_IW 75.8%_FO of_IO the_AT variance_NN1 in_II overall_JJ feeling_NN1 states_NN2 explained_VVN by_II the_AT added_JJ variables_NN2 (_( comparing_VVG null_JJ and_CC final_JJ models_NN2 ,_, Lorah_NP1 ,_, 2018_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nonetheless_RR ,_, collective_JJ biases_NN2 in_II research_NN1 methods_NN2 are_VBR clearly_RR possible_JJ (_( Dixon_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC ;_; Haidt_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; Jussim_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Together_RL these_DD2 can_VM explain_VVI the_AT initial_JJ performance_NN1 increases_VVZ with_IW practice_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE later_JJR declining_JJ returns_NN2 (_( Card_NN1 ,_, Moran_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Newell_NP1 ,_, 1983_MC ;_; Newell_NP1 &;_NULL Rosenbloom_NP1 ,_, 1981_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF negative_JJ reinforcement_NN1 ,_, "_" traditionally_RR structured_JJ "_" means_NN that_CST if_CS no_AT response_NN1 was_VBDZ made_VVN during_II an_AT1 interval_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 money_NN1 loss_NN1 occurred_VVD at_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO the_AT interval_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 development_NN1 of_IO global_JJ executive_NN1 functioning_VVG (_( Gordon_NP1 ,_, Lyon_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lee_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 their_APPGE development_NN1 of_IO specific_JJ executive_NN1 functions_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 inhibitory_JJ control_NN1 ,_, working_VVG memory_NN1 ,_, executive_NN1 planning_NN1 ,_, and_CC forward_JJ search_NN1 planning_NN1 ,_, significantly_RR contribute_VV0 to_II their_APPGE ability_NN1 to_TO conceal_VVI incriminating_JJ information_NN1 when_CS questioned_VVN (_( Alloway_NP1 ,_, McCallum_NP1 ,_, Alloway_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Hoicka_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Evans_NP1 &;_NULL Lee_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Talwar_NP1 &;_NULL Lee_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Williams_NP1 ,_, Leduc_NP1 ,_, Crossman_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Talwar_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT fall_NN1 of_IO 2013_MC I_PPIS1 joined_VVD the_AT faculty_NN1 of_IO Antioch_NP1 College_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 small_JJ ,_, historic_JJ ,_, liberal_JJ arts_NN2 undergraduate_NN1 college_NN1 in_II Ohio_NP1 ,_, United_NP1 States_NP1 of_IO America_NP1 to_TO teach_VVI psychology_NN1 as_II an_AT1 assistant_JJ professor_NN1 of_IO psychology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
ERP_VV0 modulations_NN2 were_VBDR characterised_VVN by_II an_AT1 enhanced_JJ P1_FO at_II about_II 100-150_MCMC ms_NN1 ,_, that_DD1 may_VM reflect_VVI early_JJ co-activation_NN1 of_IO visual-conceptual_JJ feature_NN1 information_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 relative_JJ posterior_JJ positivity_NN1 starting_VVG at_II about_RG 250_MC ms_NN1 that_CST was_VBDZ positively_RR correlated_VVN with_IW RTs_NP1 ,_, reflecting_VVG lexical_JJ selection_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 wealth_NN1 of_IO evidence_NN1 indicates_VVZ deficiency_NN1 in_II monoamine_NN1 neurotransmission_NN1 in_II depression_NN1 ,_, with_IW particular_JJ importance_NN1 of_IO serotonin_NN1 (_( Blier_NP1 &;_NULL El_NP1 Mansari_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Mulinari_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hypothesis_NN1 4_MC predicted_VVD that_CST greater_JJR product_NN1 involvement_NN1 is_VBZ significantly_RR associated_VVN to_II WTP_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Keywords_NN2 :_: Emotional_JJ display_NN1 rules_NN2 ;_; Arab_NN1 ;_; Ingroup/outgroup_VV0 ;_; Status_NN1 ;_; Gender_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, these_DD2 significant_JJ correlations_NN2 remained_VVN when_CS controlling_VVG for_IF hippocampal_JJ and_CC ATL_VV0 grey_JJ matter_NN1 volume_NN1 ,_, respectively_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 trajectory_NN1 presented_VVN in_II Fig._NN1 2a_FO is_VBZ the_AT force_NN1 under_II left_JJ foot_NN1 for_IF the_AT first_MD gait_NN1 cycle_NN1 completed_VVN by_II each_DD1 patient_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 2_MC shows_VVZ the_AT mean_JJ reading_NN1 time_NNT1 measures_NN2 per_II condition_NN1 and_CC region_NN1 ;_; Fig._NN1 4_MC shows_VVZ the_AT first_MD pass_NN1 duration_NN1 per_II type_NN1 of_IO intervening_JJ sentence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II 1969_MC ,_, the_AT Swiss_JJ publisher_NN1 Francke_NP1 reissued_VVD Prozess_NP1 in_II a_AT1 two-volume_JJ facsimile_NN1 hardback_NN1 edition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT analysis_NN1 of_IO the_AT structural_JJ coefficients_NN2 linking_VVG the_AT latent_JJ factors_NN2 reveals_VVZ that_CST the_AT strongest_JJT predictor_NN1 of_IO the_AT intention_NN1 to_TO choose_VVI green_JJ energy_NN1 devices_NN2 is_VBZ moral_JJ norm_NN1 (_( beta_NN1 =_FO .24_MC )_) ,_, followed_VVN by_II trust_NN1 in_II friends/relatives_NN2 and_CC neighbours_NN2 (_( beta_NN1 =_FO .21_MC )_) ,_, attitude_NN1 towards_II the_AT use_NN1 of_IO green_JJ energies_NN2 (_( beta_NN1 =_FO .18_MC )_) ,_, and_CC ascription_NN1 of_IO responsibility_NN1 (_( gamma_NN1 =_FO .15_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS the_AT sources_NN2 of_IO information_NN1 are_VBR considered_VVN in_II these_DD2 tasks_NN2 with_IW fewer_DAR executive_NN1 demands_NN2 ,_, irrespective_II21 of_II22 the_AT degree_NN1 of_IO conceptual_JJ difficulty_NN1 in_II tasks_NN2 ,_, all_DB the_AT tasks_NN2 require_VV0 processing_NN1 of_IO immediate_JJ information_NN1 conveyed_VVD through_RP both_RR a_AT1 linguistic_JJ and_CC a_AT1 perceptual_JJ channel_NN1 on_II the_AT 8SIF_NP1 (_( Achim_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT apparent_JJ slowing_VVG down_RP of_IO second-language_JJ speech_NN1 with_IW increasing_JJ expertise_NN1 highlights_VVZ the_AT impressive_JJ adaptability_NN1 of_IO the_AT speech_NN1 processor-available_JJ information_NN1 is_VBZ used_VVN to_TO optimize_VVI performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Significant-other_JJ ADHD-RS_NN1 showed_VVD a_AT1 Group_NN1 ×_II Condition_NN1 interaction_NN1 (_( F&lsqb;1,80&rsqb;_FO =_FO 5.311_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO 0.030_MC ,_, partial_JJ 2_MC =_FO 0.18_MC )_) with_IW follow-up_JJ testing_NN1 of_IO the_AT Condition_NN1 effect_NN1 in_II each_DD1 Group_NN1 separately_RR showing_VVG a_AT1 marginally_RR significant_JJ reduction_NN1 at_II Time_NNT1 2_MC for_IF the_AT AD/HD_NN1 (_( F&lsqb;1,40&rsqb;_FO =_FO 4.31_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO 0.057_MC ,_, partial_JJ 2_MC =_FO 0.25_MC )_) but_CCB not_XX Subclinical_JJ group_NN1 (_( F&lsqb;1,40&rsqb;_FO =_FO 0.540_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO 0.48_MC ,_, partial_JJ 2_MC =_FO 0.05_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS indeed_RR there_EX is_VBZ situation-specific_JJ ,_, decision-making_JJ activity_NN1 that_CST current_JJ rational_JJ choice_NN1 perspectives_NN2 fail_VV0 to_TO capture_VVI ,_, the_AT operation_NN1 of_IO several_DA2 additional_JJ heuristics_NN2 could_VM confirm_VVI this_DD1 is_VBZ the_AT case_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 define_VV0 visual_JJ frame_NN1 as_II the_AT frame_NN1 encompassing_VVG information_NN1 which_DDQ itself_PPX1 does_VDZ not_XX contain_VVI additional_JJ informational_JJ value_NN1 about_II the_AT product_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT model_NN1 was_VBDZ tested_VVN in_II Stata_NP1 13_MC with_IW maximum_JJ likelihood_NN1 estimation_NN1 (_( StataCorp_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sensitive_JJ caregivers_NN2 ensure_VV0 the_AT developing_JJ child_NN1 is_VBZ exposed_VVN to_II the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO self_NN1 and_CC others_NN2 as_CSA intentional_JJ agents_NN2 and_CC to_II different_JJ perspectives_NN2 on_II the_AT world_NN1 (_( Fernyhough_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB we_PPIS2 welcome_VV0 future_JJ empirical_JJ studies_NN2 that_CST may_VM challenge_VVI these_DD2 conclusions_NN2 through_II variations_NN2 of_IO experimental_JJ tasks_NN2 and_CC attempts_NN2 to_TO provide_VVI unifying_JJ explanations_NN2 of_IO the_AT complex_JJ data_NN pattern_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ emerging_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS these_DD2 and_CC other_JJ studies_NN2 we_PPIS2 have_VH0 mentioned_VVN largely_RR relate_VV0 to_II one_MC1 category_NN1 ,_, faces_NN2 ,_, their_APPGE results_NN2 highlight_VV0 that_CST there_EX are_VBR diverse_JJ sources_NN2 of_IO evidence_NN1 in_II31 favor_II32 of_II33 some_DD form_NN1 of_IO categorical_JJ coding_NN1 in_II the_AT ventral_JJ pathway_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ are_VBR highly_RR relevant_JJ to_II the_AT interpretation_NN1 of_IO MVPA_NP1 results_VVZ that_CST have_VH0 been_VBN used_VVN to_TO support_VVI different_JJ coding_NN1 hypotheses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT visual_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO the_AT objects_NN2 and_CC scenes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, the_AT color_NN1 and_CC number_NN1 of_IO geometric_JJ figures_NN2 )_) and_CC the_AT specific_JJ way_NN1 in_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 moved_VVD across_II the_AT scene_NN1 had_VHD to_TO be_VBI reconstructed_VVN from_II scratch_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II these_DD2 analyses_NN2 ,_, each_DD1 alternative_JJ model_NN1 included_VVD separate_JJ coefficients_NN2 for_IF the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ personality_NN1 traits_NN2 for_IF each_DD1 sex_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Table_NN1 6_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 model_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Figure_NN1 2_MC )_) proposes_VVZ that_CST lower_JJR cognitive_JJ abilities_NN2 and_CC stronger_JJR preferences_NN2 for_IF simple_JJ structure_NN1 ,_, order_NN1 ,_, and_CC predictability_NN1 increase_NN1 perceptions_NN2 of_IO changing_VVG social_JJ contexts_NN2 as_CSA threatening_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Even_CS21 if_CS22 one_PN1 would_VM prefer_VVI to_TO reserve_VVI the_AT term_NN1 schema_NN1 for_IF more_DAR complex_NN1 ,_, real-world_JJ knowledge_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 believe_VV0 our_APPGE results_NN2 still_RR reveal_VV0 important_JJ insights_NN2 on_II the_AT factors_NN2 determining_VVG event_NN1 memory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ therefore_RR important_JJ that_CST the_AT gambling_NN1 experiences_NN2 of_IO children_NN2 and_CC young_JJ people_NN are_VBR better_RRR understood_VVN to_TO develop_VVI insight_NN1 into_II the_AT ways_NN2 behaviours_NN2 are_VBR initiated_VVN ,_, embedded_JJ and_CC ,_, crucially_RR ,_, change_VV0 over_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Having_VHG been_VBN de-stabilised_VVN ,_, they_PPHS2 pass_VV0 through_II a_AT1 period_NN1 of_IO disorientation_NN1 ,_, from_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 emerge_VV0 to_II re-orientation_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Due_II21 to_II22 the_AT imprecise_JJ approximation_NN1 of_IO individual_JJ growth_NN1 trajectories_NN2 ,_, the_AT variance_NN1 estimate_NN1 is_VBZ likely_JJ to_TO be_VBI inaccurate_JJ and_CC thus_RR the_AT test_NN1 could_VM be_VBI misleading_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Like_II all_DB other_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO dehumanisation_NN1 ,_, objectification_NN1 serves_VVZ to_TO legitimize_VVI inequalities_NN2 and_CC to_TO justify_VVI dominant_JJ behaviours_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, while_CS a_AT1 side_NN1 is_VBZ black_JJ ,_, you_PPY can_VM not_XX avoid_VVI money_NN1 losses_NN2 that_CST happen_VV0 there_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, Experiment_NN1 2_MC provides_VVZ an_AT1 occasion_NN1 to_TO reevaluate_VVI how_RGQ indicative_JJ conditionals_NN2 interact_VV0 with_IW the_AT negation_NN1 operator_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Experiment_NN1 2a_FO ,_, planned_VVD contrasts_NN2 comparing_VVG each_DD1 earlier_JJR response_NN1 to_II the_AT last_MD response_NN1 revealed_VVD that_DD1 performance_NN1 was_VBDZ better_JJR for_IF only_RR the_AT first_MD response_NN1 for_IF Set_NN1 Sizes_NN2 3_MC and_CC 4_MC and_CC for_IF the_AT first_MD and_CC second_MD responses_NN2 for_IF Set_NN1 Size_NN1 6_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 study_NN1 provide_VV0 empirical_JJ evidence_NN1 that_CST spirituality_NN1 can_VM be_VBI associated_VVN with_IW concerns_NN2 for_IF diversity_NN1 and_CC justice_NN1 ,_, and_CC ministry_NN1 leaders_NN2 may_VM benefit_VVI from_II studying_VVG some_DD of_IO the_AT historical_JJ figures_NN2 and_CC theological_JJ resources_NN2 mentioned_VVN in_II this_DD1 section_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 were_VBDR composed_VVN and_CC played_VVN by_II the_AT first_MD author_NN1 on_II a_AT1 digital_JJ piano_NN1 with_IW weighted_JJ keys_NN2 and_CC recorded_VVN on_II Digital_JJ Performer_NN1 8_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ consistent_JJ with_IW research_NN1 showing_VVG that_CST although_CS in_II Spanish_JJ and_CC other_JJ transparent_JJ orthographies_NN2 children_NN2 acquire_VV0 decoding_VVG relatively_RR faster_RRR than_CSN in_II opaque_JJ ones_NN2 ,_, the_AT relative_JJ contributions_NN2 of_IO word_NN1 reading_NN1 and_CC oral_JJ language_NN1 to_II reading_VVG comprehension_NN1 are_VBR similar_JJ in_II both_DB2 types_NN2 of_IO writing_VVG systems_NN2 (_( Caravolas_NN2 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Caravolas_NN2 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Much_DA1 research_NN1 has_VHZ called_VVN on_II organisations_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE decision_NN1 makers_NN2 to_TO use_VVI P-E_NP1 fit_VV0 as_II a_AT1 way_NN1 to_TO manage_VVI employees_NN2 '_NULL affective_JJ experiences_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 job_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 (_( Kristof-Brown_JJ et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, motion_NN1 tracking_NN1 can_VM obviously_RR not_XX be_VBI used_JJ post-hoc_NN1 :_: if_CS data_NN have_VH0 already_RR been_VBN collected_VVN ,_, motion-tracking_JJ systems_NN2 are_VBR of_IO little_JJ use_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, there_EX are_VBR arguments_NN2 for_IF both_DB2 assumptions_NN2 ,_, that_CST individuals_NN2 can_VM experience_VVI more_RGR positive_JJ emotions_NN2 after_II protest_NN1 ,_, but_CCB also_RR that_DD1 collective_JJ action_NN1 participation_NN1 can_VM intensify_VVI conflict-related_JJ emotions_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 anger_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT morbidity_NN1 and_CC mortality_NN1 associated_VVN with_IW smoking_NN1 is_VBZ well_RR characterized_VVN ,_, resulting_VVG in_II approximately_RR 480,000_MC deaths_NN2 annually_RR in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 (_( USDHHS_NP2 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB participants_NN2 (_( LT_NNB and_CC TD_NN1 )_) completed_VVD all_DB practice_NN1 trials_NN2 and_CC all_DB experimental_JJ trials_NN2 for_IF the_AT comprehension_NN1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 proposal_NN1 is_VBZ based_VVN on_II the_AT framework_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ states_VVZ that_CST increasingly_RR complex_JJ stimulus_NN1 representations_NN2 are_VBR supported_VVN along_II the_AT posterior-anterior_JJ axis_NN1 of_IO the_AT ventral_JJ visual_JJ stream_NN1 ,_, from_II simple_JJ features_NN2 and_CC feature_NN1 conjunctions_NN2 ,_, to_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 unique_JJ object_NN1 (_( Bussey_NP1 &;_NULL Saksida_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Cowell_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT stimuli_NN2 consisted_VVN of_IO 12_MC one-character_JJ Chinese_JJ words_NN2 selected_VVN from_II popular_JJ Chinese_JJ textbooks_NN2 for_IF Grade_NN1 1_MC1 to_II Grade_NN1 6_MC in_II Hong_NP1 Kong_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Definition_NN1 debates_NN2 on_II population_NN1 criteria_NN2 (_( typically_RR vs._II atypically_RR developing_VVG )_) ,_, variations_NN2 on_II specific_JJ syndromes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, type_NN1 of_IO disorder_NN1 ,_, precocious_JJ decoding_NN1 )_) and_CC different_JJ quantification_NN1 criteria_NN2 of_IO decoding_NN1 may_VM have_VHI caused_VVN research_NN1 to_TO generate_VVI different_JJ or_CC even_RR conflicting_JJ answers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, a_AT1 plausible_JJ interpretation_NN1 of_IO the_AT findings_NN2 from_II the_AT late_JJ incentive_NN1 condition_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT timing_NN1 of_IO the_AT reward_NN1 cue_NN1 did_VDD not_XX allow_VVI a_AT1 sufficient_JJ period_NN1 for_IF incentive_NN1 signals_NN2 to_TO be_VBI encoded_VVN and_CC processed_VVN in_II a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST enabled_VVD proactive_JJ control_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, for_IF a_AT1 display_NN1 of_IO two_MC umbrellas_NN2 on_II top_NN1 and_CC three_MC shoes_NN2 on_II the_AT bottom_NN1 ,_, with_IW umbrella_NN1 assigned_VVN the_AT value_NN1 of_IO 2_MC and_CC shoe_NN1 assigned_VVN the_AT value_NN1 of_IO 1_MC1 ,_, the_AT umbrellas_NN2 are_VBR of_IO higher_JJR combined_JJ value_NN1 and_CC hence_RR the_AT top_JJ display_NN1 should_VM be_VBI selected_VVN (_( top_NN1 >_FO bottom_NN1 ;_; Figure_NN1 1a_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Across_II four_MC experiments_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 showed_VVD that_CST people_NN can_VM robustly_RR parse_VVI such_DA sequences_NN2 from_II a_AT1 continuous_JJ stream_NN1 of_IO trajectories_NN2 under_II increasingly_RR stringent_JJ tests_NN2 of_IO segmentation_NN1 ability_NN1 and_CC statistical_JJ learning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, OCD_VV0 patients_NN2 did_VDD show_VVI a_AT1 trend_NN1 toward_II significantly_RR greater_JJR risk_NN1 aversion_NN1 when_CS safe_JJ options_NN2 were_VBDR framed_VVN as_II a_AT1 potential_JJ gain_NN1 ,_, suggesting_VVG a_AT1 behavioral_JJ pattern_NN1 that_CST may_VM be_VBI motivated_VVN more_RRR by_II approach_NN1 to_TO reward_VVI (_( choosing_VVG the_AT safe_JJ option_NN1 when_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ framed_VVN as_II a_AT1 potential_JJ gain_NN1 )_) than_CSN by_II avoidance_NN1 of_IO losses_NN2 (_( avoiding_VVG the_AT safe_JJ option_NN1 when_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ framed_VVN as_II a_AT1 potential_JJ loss_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 positive_JJ value_NN1 indicated_VVD better_JJR recognition_NN1 when_CS the_AT emotion_NN1 is_VBZ directed_VVN toward_II the_AT observer_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS a_AT1 negative_JJ value_NN1 indicated_VVD better_JJR recognition_NN1 when_CS the_AT emotion_NN1 is_VBZ directed_VVN away_II21 from_II22 the_AT observer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 sizeable_JJ literature_NN1 on_II relation_NN1 between_II trait_NN1 anxiety_NN1 and_CC memory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT main_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO task_NN1 type_NN1 (_( F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 14_MC )_) =_FO 7.95_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .014_MC ,_, p2_FO =_FO .362_MC )_) showed_VVD that_CST the_AT N2pc_FO amplitude_NN1 for_IF priming_VVG was_VBDZ larger_JJR than_CSN for_IF the_AT WM_NP1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT DG_NP1 ,_, in_II turn_NN1 ,_, behavior_NN1 is_VBZ primarily_RR a_AT1 matter_NN1 of_IO temptation_NN1 to_TO exploit_VVI others_NN2 given_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT dictator_NN1 has_VHZ full_JJ power_NN1 over_II the_AT final_JJ distribution_NN1 of_IO resources_NN2 and_CC thus_RR needs_VVZ not_XX fear_VV0 any_DD selfishness_NN1 or_CC retaliation_NN1 by_II the_AT powerless_JJ recipient_NN1 (_( Thielmann_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 two-way_JJ ANOVA_NN1 test_NN1 was_VBDZ conducted_VVN to_TO demonstrate_VVI how_RRQ gloss_NN1 type_NN1 and_CC learning_VVG condition_NN1 interactions_NN2 contributed_VVN to_II the_AT reading_NN1 comprehension_NN1 performance_NN1 of_IO the_AT participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Contrary_II21 to_II22 the_AT expected_JJ curvilinear_JJ development_NN1 of_IO adolescent_JJ delinquency_NN1 often_RR characterized_VVN by_II an_AT1 increase_NN1 until_CS the_AT age_NN1 of_IO 15_MC followed_VVD by_II a_AT1 decline_NN1 in_II late_JJ adolescence_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Moffitt_NP1 1993_MC )_) ,_, in_II the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 delinquency_NN1 declined_VVD linearly_RR across_II adolescence_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 adolescents_NN2 and_CC their_APPGE best_JJT friends_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 effects_NN2 demonstrate_VV0 that_CST causal_JJ changes_NN2 in_II the_AT patient_NN1 must_VM be_VBI included_VVN in_II the_AT representation_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 event_NN1 and_CC ,_, moreover_RR ,_, that_DD1 such_DA changes_NN2 are_VBR represented_VVN in_II the_AT temporal_JJ order_NN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT features_NN2 occur_VV0 ,_, chronologically_RR from_II a_AT1 source_NN1 feature_NN1 to_II a_AT1 resulting_JJ feature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Less_DAR attention_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN paid_VVN to_II the_AT dynamic_JJ role_NN1 played_VVN by_II social_JJ context_NN1 perceptions_NN2 in_II whether_CSW and_CC how_RRQ people_NN act_VV0 on_II their_APPGE beliefs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Recruitment_NN1 strategies_NN2 resulted_VVN in_II parents_NN2 of_IO potential_JJ participants_NN2 downloading_VVG an_AT1 information_NN1 pack_NN1 from_II a_AT1 university_NN1 website_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT target_NN1 list_NN1 was_VBDZ refreshed_VVN at_II the_AT start_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 multitasking_JJ phase_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_NN1 4_MC shows_VVZ each_DD1 participant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 response_NN1 allocation_NN1 for_IF homogeneous_JJ (_( open_JJ data_NN points_NN2 )_) and_CC heterogeneous_JJ (_( filled_JJ data_NN points_NN2 )_) reinforcement_NN1 conditions_NN2 ;_; see_VV0 Appendix_NN1 A_ZZ1 for_IF raw_JJ terminal_JJ data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Again_RT responses_NN2 to_II neutral_JJ expressions_NN2 were_VBDR not_XX included_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
How_RRQ this_DD1 content_NN1 becomes_VVZ distorted_JJ is_VBZ an_AT1 open_JJ question_NN1 ,_, though_CS there_EX have_VH0 been_VBN some_DD early_JJ attempts_NN2 to_TO trace_VVI this_DD1 distortion_NN1 back_RP to_II a_AT1 single_JJ cause_NN1 (_( Gadsby_NP1 ,_, 2017b_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, U_ZZ1 has_VHZ three_MC categories_NN2 with_IW cell_NN1 probabilities_NN2 (_( 0.2_MC ,_, 0.5_MC ,_, 0.3_MC )_) and_CC V_ZZ1 has_VHZ five_MC categories_NN2 with_IW cell_NN1 probabilities_NN2 (_( 0.1_MC ,_, 0.1_MC ,_, 0.3_MC ,_, 0.3_MC ,_, 0.2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, the_AT key_JJ fact_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST these_DD2 opportunities_NN2 exist_VV0 almost_RR exclusively_RR for_IF women_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT taste-based_JJ discrimination_NN1 model_NN1 provides_VVZ no_AT explanation_NN1 as_II21 to_II22 why_RRQ a_AT1 preference_NN1 for_IF attractive_JJ people_NN or_CC a_AT1 prejudice_NN1 against_II unattractive_JJ people_NN exists_VVZ ;_; in_II fact_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 model_NN1 is_VBZ descriptive_JJ rather_II21 than_II22 explanatory_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 showed_VVD that_CST whereas_CS young_JJ adults_NN2 can_VM narrow_JJ attention_NN1 to_II one_MC1 stream_NN1 within_II 133_MC ms_NN1 ,_, older_JJR adults_NN2 were_VBDR unable_JK to_TO do_VDI the_AT same_DA within_II this_DD1 time_NNT1 period_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT condition_NN1 of_IO injustice_NN1 and_CC comparative_JJ judgements_NN2 ,_, the_AT participants_NN2 were_VBDR given_VVN the_AT following_JJ information_NN1 :_: '_NULL You_PPY and_CC another_DD1 student_NN1 of_IO your_APPGE class_NN1 answered_VVD 70%_NNU of_IO the_AT test_NN1 questions_NN2 correctly_RR and_CC the_AT answers_NN2 you_PPY gave_VVD were_VBDR equally_RR clear_JJ ,_, complete_JJ and_CC well_RR written_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Feltsecurity_NN1 was_VBDZ relatively_RR high_JJ ,_, and_CC cognitive_JJ openness_NN1 was_VBDZ moderate_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 therefore_RR seems_VVZ reasonable_JJ to_TO assume_VVI under_II either_DD1 theory_NN1 that_CST reliably_RR discovering_VVG the_AT criterial_JJ attribute_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR effortful_JJ than_CSN responding_VVG on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 arbitrarily_RR chosen_VVN single_JJ dimension_NN1 (_( which_DDQ will_VM be_VBI non-criterial_JJ with_IW probability_NN1 .75_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Distinctiveness_NN1 also_RR influenced_VVN memory_NN1 ,_, but_CCB the_AT observed_JJ isolation_NN1 effects_NN2 depended_VVN on_II the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT stimulus_NN1 contrasts_NN2 introduced_VVN during_II encoding_VVG as_CSA was_VBDZ predicted_VVN by_II the_AT second_MD factor_NN1 of_IO the_AT three-factor_JJ model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cattell_NP1 accomplished_VVD much_RR before_II his_APPGE 23rd_MD birthday_NN1 ,_, and_CC through_II the_AT spring_NN1 of_IO 1883_MC he_PPHS1 had_VHD good_JJ reason_NN1 to_TO be_VBI proud_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Contrary_II21 to_II22 expectation_NN1 ,_, anxious_JJ children_NN2 did_VDD not_XX differ_VVI from_II controls_NN2 in_II estimates_NN2 of_IO avoidance_NN1 in_II any_DD condition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 address_VV0 a_AT1 crucial_JJ condition_NN1 for_IF an_AT1 effective_JJ reputation_NN1 building_NN1 to_TO reduce_VVI deception_NN1 in_II principal-agent_JJ relationships_NN2 :_: an_AT1 agent_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reputation_NN1 can_VM only_RR be_VBI established_VVN if_CS the_AT underlying_JJ information_NN1 is_VBZ both_RR credible_JJ and_CC accessible_JJ for_IF her_APPGE future_JJ principals_NN2 (_( Sobel_NP1 ,_, 1985_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, given_VVN the_AT exploratory_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE analyses_NN2 ,_, this_DD1 study_NN1 only_RR provides_VVZ a_AT1 preliminary_JJ validation_NN1 and_CC further_JJR research_NN1 is_VBZ needed_VVN to_TO confirm_VVI these_DD2 results_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bartlett_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 test_NN1 of_IO sphericity_NN1 (_( p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ tests_VVZ whether_CSW the_AT items_NN2 are_VBR interdependent_JJ ,_, and_CC the_AT Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin_NP1 measure_NN1 of_IO sampling_VVG adequacy_NN1 (_( .87_MC )_) confirmed_VVD that_CST the_AT data_NN were_VBDR adequate_JJ for_IF the_AT analyses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 system_NN1 ,_, three_MC features_NN2 of_IO the_AT hand_NN1 are_VBR annotated_VVN :_: handshape_VV0 ,_, location_NN1 ,_, and_CC motion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 subsequently_RR filled_VVN in_II a_AT1 funnelled_JJ awareness_NN1 check_NN1 to_TO assess_VVI whether_CSW they_PPHS2 were_VBDR aware_JJ of_IO any_DD contingencies_NN2 between_II cue_NN1 and_CC probe_VV0 location_NN1 and_CC between_II cue_NN1 and_CC pictorial_JJ stimuli_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
High_JJ degree_NN1 of_IO correlation_NN1 was_VBDZ found_VVN between_II in_JJ21 vivo_JJ22 IMT_NN1 ,_, in_RR21 vitro_RR22 IMT_VV0 and_CC average_JJ wall_NN1 thickness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Referring_VVG to_II our_APPGE discipline_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 goal_NN1 ,_, OttoFenichel_NP1 remarked_VVD that_CST "_" the_AT issue_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX to_TO heal_VVI this_DD1 or_CC that_DD1 neurotic_JJ ,_, but_CCB of_IO applying_VVG thought_NN1 generally_RR to_II the_AT events_NN2 of_IO psychic_JJ life_NN1 ..._... a_AT1 living_JJ thought_NN1 which_DDQ is_VBZ orientated_VVN towards_II the_AT fullness_NN1 of_IO reality_NN1 "_" (_( Fenichel_NP1 ,_, 1934-1945_MCMC ,_, Rundbriefe_NP1 ,_, XLVIII/25_MC June_NPM1 1938/192_MF )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 reasoning_NN1 was_VBDZ employed_VVN in_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 to_TO determine_VVI whether_CSW the_AT rate_NN1 at_II which_DDQ the_AT focus_NN1 of_IO attention_NN1 contracts_VVZ changes_NN2 with_IW age_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Basic_JJ personality_NN1 traits_NN2 are_VBR believed_VVN to_TO be_VBI expressed_VVN in_RP ,_, and_CC predictable_JJ from_II ,_, smart_JJ phone_NN1 data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Japanese_NN1 are_VBR admired_VVN in_II this_DD1 categorization_NN1 because_CS they_PPHS2 are_VBR '_NULL even_RR building_NN1 '_NULL ,_, thus_RR further_RRR supporting_VVG the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST deserving_JJ victims_NN2 are_VBR energetic_JJ and_CC proactive_JJ in_II dealing_VVG with_IW disaster_NN1 situations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, although_CS the_AT Kurzban_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 studies_NN2 provided_VVD the_AT first_MD demonstration_NN1 that_CST racial_JJ categorization_NN1 could_VM be_VBI reduced_VVN ,_, it_PPH1 did_VDD not_XX provide_VVI unambiguous_JJ evidence_NN1 that_CST the_AT reduction_NN1 effect_NN1 more_RGR strongly_RR impacted_JJ race_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 seems_VVZ to_II us_PPIO2 more_DAR likely_JJ that_CST features_NN2 are_VBR emergent_JJ higher-level_JJ units_NN2 derived_VVN from_II learning_VVG environmental_JJ co-occurrences_NN2 (_( Hommel_NP1 ,_, Müsseler_NP1 ,_, Aschersleben_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Prinz_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC ;_; Schyns_NP2 ,_, Goldstone_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Thibaut_NP1 ,_, 1998_MC )_) and_CC thus_RR will_VM vary_VVI depending_II21 on_II22 the_AT experiences_NN2 of_IO an_AT1 organism_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 current_JJ task_NN1 demands_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 believe_VV0 that_CST this_DD1 review_NN1 may_VM contribute_VVI to_TO provide_VVI an_AT1 overall_JJ view_NN1 of_IO the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II pure_JJ basal_JJ ganglia_NN2 lesions_NN2 and_CC language_NN1 symptoms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_CS21 that_CS22 D2Rs_FO did_VDD not_XX modulate_VVI spatial_JJ working_JJ memory_NN1 sustained_JJ activity_NN1 &lsqb;_( 97_MC &rsqb;_) ,_, spatial_JJ information_NN1 or_CC motor_NN1 preparation_NN1 during_II the_AT delay_NN1 period_NN1 might_VM not_XX be_VBI modulated_VVN by_II D2Rs_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT complexities_NN2 of_IO programming_VVG CATs_NN2 and_CC providing_VVG a_AT1 platform_NN1 for_IF their_APPGE use_NN1 has_VHZ hindered_VVN many_DA2 who_PNQS have_VH0 wished_VVN to_TO tap_VVI their_APPGE efficiencies_NN2 and_CC capabilities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 allows_VVZ them_PPHO2 to_TO compare_VVI the_AT relative_JJ size_NN1 of_IO the_AT two_MC effects_NN2 ,_, suggesting_VVG that_DD1 margin_NN1 trading_NN1 may_VM outweigh_VVI the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO short_JJ selling_NN1 when_CS both_DB2 types_NN2 of_IO borrowing_NN1 are_VBR simultaneously_RR permitted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR wanted_VVD to_TO see_VVI whether_CSW there_EX were_VBDR any_DD obvious_JJ biases_NN2 in_II how_RRQ this_DD1 model_NN1 predicts_VVZ data_NN versus_II the_AT actual_JJ data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 (_( Novembre_NP1 ,_, Ticini_NP1 ,_, Schu_NP1 effect_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST pianists_NN2 automatically_RR represent_VV0 heard_VVN music_NN1 using_VVG their_APPGE own_DA motor_NN1 processes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 to_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR observed_VVN a_AT1 significant_JJ adjustment_NN1 due_JJ to_TO overlap_VVI condition_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, significant_JJ difference_NN1 surface_NN1 )_) ,_, indicating_VVG that_CST the_AT Time_NNT1 ×_II Proficiency_NP1 surface_NN1 for_IF OH-PL_NP1 (_( Figure_NN1 5_MC ,_, Panel_NN1 2_MC )_) deviates_VVZ significantly_RR from_II the_AT main_JJ Time_NNT1 ×_II Proficiency_NP1 surface_NN1 (_( Figure_NN1 5_MC ,_, Panel_NN1 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG other_JJ adolescent_JJ addiction_NN1 studies_NN2 ,_, for_IF this_DD1 latent_JJ factor_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 used_VVD four_MC indicators_NN2 to_TO represent_VVI the_AT latent_JJ variable_NN1 of_IO problem_NN1 drinking_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Statistics_NN for_IF target_NN1 words_NN2 are_VBR shown_VVN in_II Table_NN1 4_MC (_( although_CS the_AT superordinate_JJ condition_NN1 is_VBZ omitted_VVN since_CS these_DD2 labels_NN2 were_VBDR repeated_VVN across_II multiple_JJ trials_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 also_RR that_CST the_AT variance_NN1 explained_VVN varies_VVZ substantially_RR across_II outcome_NN1 measures_NN2 ,_, ranging_VVG from_II 7%_NNU for_IF violent_JJ ,_, non-normative_JJ action_NN1 to_II 50%_NNU for_IF normative_JJ actions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
McClelland_NP1 (_( 2007_MC )_) echoes_VVZ this_DD1 sentiment_NN1 ,_, "_" George_NP1 Manley_NP1 said_VVD oh_UH ,_, you_PPY know_VV0 ,_, you_PPY '_NULL ll_NNU never_RR sell_VV0 5000_MC copies_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
None_PN of_IO the_AT conditions_NN2 had_VHD an_AT1 adequate_JJ item-level_JJ power_NN1 when_CS the_AT effect_NN1 was_VBDZ small_JJ (_( =_FO .2_MC ,_, -.2_MC or_CC =_FO .125_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_RR ,_, the_AT changes_NN2 over_II the_AT year_NNT1 may_VM indicate_VVI that_CST despite_II the_AT differences_NN2 between_II groups_NN2 ,_, each_DD1 group_NN1 performed_VVN with_IW a_AT1 similar_JJ rate_NN1 of_IO improvement_NN1 over_II the_AT year_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, these_DD2 findings_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST students_NN2 who_PNQS would_VM consider_VVI themselves_PPX2 as_RG most_RRT committed_VVN to_II the_AT interests_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE ingroup_NN1 by_II engaging_VVG in_II radical_JJ strategies_NN2 for_IF change_NN1 ironically_RR disidentify_VV0 from_II students_NN2 as_II a_AT1 group_NN1 if_CS their_APPGE radical_JJ agenda_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX shared_VVN by_II the_AT majority_NN1 of_IO the_AT ingroup_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT participant_NN1 was_VBDZ presented_VVN with_IW six_MC scenarios_NN2 and_CC had_VHD to_TO make_VVI a_AT1 decision_NN1 in_II each_DD1 scenario_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Summary_NN1 scores_NN2 were_VBDR derived_VVN for_IF hyporesponsiveness_NN1 and_CC hyperresponsiveness_NN1 in_II both_DB2 social_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, name_NN1 call_NN1 ;_; hypo_NN1 =_FO 0.53_MC ;_; hyper_RR =_FO 0.41_MC )_) and_CC nonsocial_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, flashing_VVG light_NN1 ;_; hypo_NN1 =_FO 0.59_MC ;_; hyper_RR =_FO 0.55_MC )_) domains_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, if_CS schools_NN2 need_VV0 to_TO use_VVI metal_NN1 detectors_NN2 to_TO keep_VVI lethal_JJ weapons_NN2 out_RP ,_, then_RT violence_NN1 might_VM be_VBI different_JJ in_II these_DD2 spaces_NN2 than_CSN in_II a_AT1 school_NN1 that_CST does_VDZ not_XX perceive_VVI the_AT need_NN1 to_TO use_VVI metal_NN1 detectors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ to_II the_AT analysis_NN1 of_IO syntactic_JJ frame_NN1 diversity_NN1 ,_, the_AT ratio_NN1 of_IO different_JJ morphological_JJ contexts_NN2 to_TO total_VVI verb_NN1 tokens_NN2 was_VBDZ computed_VVN for_IF each_DD1 target_NN1 verb_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT replicated_JJ and_CC mean_JJ ERPs_NN2 for_IF the_AT no-gap_JJ condition_NN1 were_VBDR overlaid_VVN for_IF the_AT active_JJ and_CC passive_JJ tasks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA Causey_NP1 (_( 2017_MC )_) asserts_VVZ ,_, the_AT drawing_NN1 (_( of_IO lines_NN2 )_) can_VM connect_VVI us_PPIO2 to_II our_APPGE '_NULL inside_NN1 '_NULL and_CC '_NULL outside_JJ '_NULL worlds_NN2 through_II the_AT capturing_NN1 of_IO embodied_VVN memories_NN2 and_CC experiences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Let_VV0 us_PPIO2 notice_VVI ,_, here_RL ,_, that_CST this_DD1 interpretation_NN1 is_VBZ another_DD1 example_NN1 of_IO strong_JJ inferences_NN2 :_: the_AT LRP_NP1 is_VBZ interpreted_VVN as_II an_AT1 index_NN1 of_IO response_NN1 activation_NN1 because_CS this_DD1 "_" component_NN1 "_" (_( which_DDQ is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 component_NN1 according_II21 to_II22 the_AT definition_NN1 we_PPIS2 gave_VVD previously_RR )_) is_VBZ assumed_VVN to_TO arise_VVI from_II M1_FO and_CC ,_, of_RR21 course_RR22 ,_, because_II21 of_II22 the_AT exclusively_RR motor_VV0 functions_NN2 usually_RR attributed_VVN to_II M1_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 explored_VVD ,_, using_VVG Tobit_NN1 models_NN2 ,_, 33_MC whether_CSW the_AT stated_JJ WTPs_NP1 were_VBDR related_VVN to_II three_MC key_JJ elements_NN2 :_: (_( i_ZZ1 )_) parents_NN2 '_NULL financial_JJ situation_NN1 ;_; (_( ii_MC )_) children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 health_NN1 ;_; and_CC (_( iii_MC )_) level_NN1 of_IO pain_NN1 experienced_VVN by_II the_AT children_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Research_NN1 shows_VVZ that_CST narcissists_VVZ generally_RR make_VV0 a_AT1 positive_JJ first_MD impression_NN1 ,_, as_CSA others_NN2 preliminarily_RR perceive_VV0 them_PPHO2 to_TO be_VBI charming_JJ and_CC self-confident_JJ ;_; but_CCB over_II time_NNT1 more_RRR negative_JJ qualities_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 arrogance_NN1 ,_, exploitativeness_NN1 ,_, and_CC self-centeredness_JJ damage_NN1 narcissists_VVZ '_NULL relationships_NN2 (_( Back_NN1 ,_, Schmukle_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Egloff_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Paulhus_NP1 ,_, 1998_MC ;_; Robins_NP &;_NULL Beer_NN1 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, even_CS21 if_CS22 the_AT problem_NN1 of_IO identifiability_NN1 is_VBZ resolved_VVN ,_, a_AT1 new_JJ problem_NN1 arises_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Individual_JJ stimuli_NN2 were_VBDR displayed_VVN for_IF 1,500_MC ms_NN1 in_II 40-pt_JJ white_JJ Arial_JJ Greek_NN1 on_II black_JJ background_NN1 ,_, controlled_VVN by_II DMDX_NP1 (_( Forster_NP1 &;_NULL Forster_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Almost_RR 15%_NNU of_IO people_NN reported_VVD feeling_NN1 depressed_VVD the_AT previous_JJ day_NNT1 ,_, and_CC there_EX was_VBDZ very_RG wide_JJ variation_NN1 from_II one_MC1 country_NN1 to_II another_DD1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 focus_VV0 on_RP where_CS these_DD2 narratives_NN2 fit_VV0 within_II the_AT larger_JJR body_NN1 of_IO literature_NN1 on_II narrative_JJ identity_NN1 at_II two_MC developmental_JJ periods_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 :_: midlife_NN1 and_CC adolescence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 single_JJ phonological_JJ locus_NN1 (_( one_MC1 source_NN1 )_) would_VM generate_VVI a_AT1 majority_NN1 of_IO errors_NN2 containing_VVG moderate_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO target_NN1 phonology_NN1 ,_, since_CS nonword_NN1 construction_NN1 follows_VVZ appropriate_JJ lexical_JJ retrieval_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT discovery_NN1 of_IO empirical_JJ evidence_NN1 might_VM not_XX represent_VVI a_AT1 necessary_JJ or_CC sufficient_JJ condition_NN1 for_IF creating_VVG scientific_JJ change_NN1 in_II psychology_NN1 (_( Kuhn_NP1 ,_, 1962_MC ;_; Longino_NP1 ,_, 1990_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Does_VDZ Scene_NN1 Construction_NN1 Retain_VV0 Influence_NN1 on_II Navigation_NN1 When_CS Spatial_JJ Processing_NN1 Is_VBZ Taken_VVN Into_II Account_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
The_AT sample_NN1 differed_VVD only_RR minimally_RR on_II the_AT demographic_JJ variables_NN2 above_RL before_RT and_CC after_II applying_VVG the_AT exclusion_NN1 criteria_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Attitude_NN1 acquisition_NN1 is_VBZ typically_RR demonstrated_VVN only_RR for_IF CSs_NP1 for_IF which_DDQ the_AT corresponding_JJ US_NP1 valence_NN1 can_VM be_VBI reported_VVN correctly_RR (_( e.g._REX ,_, Pleyers_NP1 ,_, Corneille_NP1 ,_, Luminet_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Yzerbyt_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Stahl_NP1 ,_, Unkelbach_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Corneille_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD ,_, Fu_NP1 ,_, Exeter_NP1 ,_, and_CC Anderson_NP1 (_( 2015_MC )_) critically_RR examine_VV0 '_NULL relative_JJ deprivation_NN1 ,_, '_NULL (_( Townsend_NP1 ,_, 1987_MC )_) ,_, an_AT1 often-used_JJ measure_NN1 of_IO health_NN1 inequalities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, recent_JJ observational_JJ studies_NN2 have_VH0 documented_VVN that_CST peer_VV0 victimization_NN1 is_VBZ positively_RR correlated_VVN with_IW problem_NN1 behaviors_NN2 including_II school_NN1 absenteeism_NN1 (_( Aragon_NP1 ,_, Poteat_NP1 ,_, Espelage_NP1 &;_NULL Koenig_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Dube_NP1 &;_NULL Orpinas_NP2 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Dunkle_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Feldman_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, mean_JJ boredom_NN1 ratings_NN2 never_RR exceeded_VVD 5_MC on_II a_AT1 7-point_JJ scale_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_JJ21 priori_JJ22 power_NN1 analysis_NN1 revealed_VVD that_CST a_AT1 total_JJ sample_NN1 size_NN1 of_IO 159_MC would_VM be_VBI required_VVN to_TO explore_VVI the_AT differences_NN2 between_II the_AT three_MC groups_NN2 at_II the_AT recommended_JJ level_NN1 of_IO .80_MC (_( Cohen_NP1 ,_, 1992_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, it_PPH1 remains_VVZ unclear_JJ which_DDQ brain_NN1 areas_NN2 underlie_VV0 general_JJ magnitude_NN1 processing_NN1 and_CC which_DDQ specifically_RR support_VV0 number_NN1 processing_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, staff_NN time_NNT1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 valuable_JJ contribution_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT secondary_JJ outcomes_NN2 included_VVD duration_NN1 of_IO pressure_NN1 support_NN1 ,_, duration_NN1 of_IO supplemental_JJ oxygen_NN1 ,_, gestational_JJ age_NN1 on_II reaching_VVG room_NN1 air_NN1 and_CC retinopathy_NN1 of_IO prematurity_NN1 rates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 the_AT relationship_NN1 of_IO attention_NN1 performance_NN1 and_CC N2_FO amplitudes_NN2 it_PPH1 should_VM be_VBI noted_VVN that_CST shorter_JJR reaction_NN1 times_NNT2 to_II Go-stimuli_NN2 were_VBDR associated_VVN with_IW less_RGR pronounced_JJ Go-N2_JJ amplitudes_NN2 (_( r_ZZ1 =-0.29_FO ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.05_MC ,_, two-tailed_JJ )_) as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 NoGo-N2_JJ amplitudes_NN2 (_( r_ZZ1 =-0.34_FO ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO 0.05_MC ,_, two-tailed_JJ ;_; see_VV0 Fig._NN1 7_MC )_) only_RR in_II the_AT aversive_JJ feedback_NN1 condition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Subjects_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO verify_VVI the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II adjectives_NN2 denoting_VVG a_AT1 source_NN1 and_CC resulting_JJ feature_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 patient_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, receivers_NN2 accepted_VVN on_II average_NN1 significantly_RR more_DAR messages_NN2 in_II Tendo_NP1 (_( 54.8%_FO )_) compared_VVN to_II the_AT baseline_NN1 (_( p=0.002_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, in_II the_AT (_( Sem-/Gen+_NP1 )_) condition_NN1 ,_, both_DB2 the_AT target_NN1 image_NN1 and_CC the_AT foil_NN1 image_NN1 contained_VVD the_AT same_DA adjective_NN1 ,_, meaning_VVG that_CST the_AT only_JJ disambiguating_JJ gender_NN1 information_NN1 in_II the_AT gender_NN1 prime_NN1 was_VBDZ the_AT indefinite_JJ article_NN1 and_CC the_AT adjective_NN1 endings_NN2 ,_, not_XX the_AT adjective_NN1 itself_PPX1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA in_II the_AT previous_JJ modelling_NN1 studies_NN2 ,_, the_AT authors_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST the_AT cognitive_JJ control_NN1 node_NN1 might_VM correspond_VVI to_II the_AT dorsal_JJ anterior_JJ cingulate_NN1 cortex_NN1 (_( dACC_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Campbell_NP1 systematic_JJ reviews_NN2 by_II Braga_NP1 (_( 2007_MC )_) and_CC by_II Braga_NP1 ,_, Papachristos_NP1 ,_, and_CC Hureau_NP1 (_( 2012_MC ,_, 2014_MC )_) have_VH0 reached_VVN similar_JJ conclusions_NN2 ;_; the_AT findings_NN2 from_II most_DAT hot_JJ spots_NN2 studies_NN2 show_VV0 statistically_RR significant_JJ positive_JJ results_NN2 ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST when_CS police_NN2 focus_VV0 on_II high-crime_JJ small_JJ geographic_JJ areas_NN2 with_IW high_JJ crime_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 can_VM reduce_VVI crime_NN1 at_II these_DD2 locations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS so_RR ,_, this_DD1 would_VM suggest_VVI that_CST the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO dissonance_NN1 for_IF low-status_JJ groups_NN2 generalize_VV0 to_II systems_NN2 beyond_II the_AT group-based_JJ hierarchy_NN1 directly_RR responsible_JJ for_IF their_APPGE relative_JJ status-disadvantage_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT most_RGT relevant_JJ difference_NN1 was_VBDZ the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO false_JJ memories_NN2 in_II the_AT group_NN1 with_IW only_RR one_MC1 training–testing_JJ cycle_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, with_IW only_RR one_MC1 equivalence_NN1 relation_NN1 per_II class_NN1 tested_VVN )_) when_CS compared_VVN to_II the_AT groups_NN2 with_IW more_DAR than_CSN one_MC1 training–testing_JJ cycle_NN1 (_( many/moderate_FU and_CC many/high_FU groups_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 implies_VVZ discarding_VVG data_NN from_II users_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 written_VVN less_DAR than_CSN 10_MC text_NN1 messages_NN2 ,_, made_VVD 5_MC phone_NN1 calls_NN2 or_CC have_VH0 100_MC GPS_NN2 data_NN points_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 users_NN2 with_IW no_AT Facebook_NN1 friends_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT full_JJ text_NN1 articles_NN2 were_VBDR read_VVN by_II the_AT first_MD and_CC the_AT third_MD author_NN1 and_CC any_DD disagreements_NN2 (_( 6%_NNU of_IO the_AT articles_NN2 )_) were_VBDR resolved_VVN by_II consensus_NN1 discussion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Placing_VVG the_AT current_JJ evidence_NN1 in_II the_AT wider_JJR context_NN1 of_IO clinical_JJ psychological_JJ research_NN1 with_IW children_NN2 and_CC adolescents_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI noted_VVN that_CST the_AT contributing_JJ factors_NN2 on_II the_AT family_NN1 and_CC community_NN1 level_NN1 such_II21 as_II22 parental_JJ mental_JJ health_NN1 problems_NN2 ,_, maladaptive_JJ parenting_NN1 and_CC peer_VV0 support_NN1 are_VBR for_RR41 the_RR42 most_RR43 part_RR44 well_RR in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 established_JJ evidence_NN1 from_II non-refugee_JJ populations_NN2 (_( Lambert_NP1 ,_, Holzer_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Hasbun_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; McLeod_NP1 ,_, Weisz_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Wood_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT strong_JJ meaning_NN1 of_IO "_" two_MC "_" can_VM be_VBI formed_VVN by_II combining_VVG its_APPGE weak_JJ meaning_NN1 (_( the_AT lexical_JJ meaning_NN1 )_) ,_, at_RR21 least_RR22 two_MC ,_, with_IW not_XX at_RR21 least_RR22 three_MC (_( =less_FO than_CSN 3_MC )_) ,_, not_XX at_RR21 least_RR22 four_MC (_( =less_FO than_CSN 4_MC )_) ,_, etc._RA to_TO give_VVI at_RR21 least_RR22 two_MC but_CCB less_DAR than_CSN 3_MC ,_, i.e._REX the_AT exact_JJ meaning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, all_DB 21_MC of_IO the_AT elements_NN2 within_II that_DD1 were_VBDR consistent_JJ with_IW Figure_NN1 1_MC1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, or_CC ,_, in_II words_NN2 ,_, overall_JJ well-being_NN1 present_NN1 loading_VVG on_II overall_JJ well-being_NN1 )_) were_VBDR statistically_RR significant_JJ and_CC meaningfully_RR large_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, these_DD2 standardized_JJ values_NN2 ranged_VVN from_II .64_MC to_II .99_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT increase_NN1 of_IO substance_NN1 use_NN1 from_II low-_NN1 to_II high-intensity_NN1 situations_NN2 of_IO shame_NN1 did_VDD not_XX differ_VVI between_II the_AT traumaSUD_NN1 group_NN1 and_CC the_AT nontraumaHC_NN1 group_NN1 (_( p_ZZ1 =_FO .164_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT quality_NN1 of_IO parenting_NN1 behaviour_NN1 accounts_VVZ for_IF a_AT1 significant_JJ ,_, though_CS small_JJ proportion_NN1 of_IO the_AT explained_JJ variance_NN1 in_II individual_JJ differences_NN2 in_II child_NN1 EF_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Table_NN1 7_MC ,_, the_AT percentages_NN2 of_IO respondents_NN2 fulfilling_VVG the_AT criteria_NN2 for_IF each_DD1 of_IO the_AT 12_MC items_NN2 and_CC the_AT mean_JJ scores_NN2 for_IF IP6_FO and_CC EP6_FO are_VBR presented_VVN for_IF each_DD1 of_IO the_AT 6_MC classes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ particularly_RR important_JJ given_CS21 that_CS22 there_EX are_VBR several_DA2 scales_NN2 frequently_RR used_VVN to_II measure_NN1 different_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO job_NN1 demands_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, workload_NN1 ;_; Fox_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1993_MC ;_; Ilies_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ,_, and_CC there_EX is_VBZ little_DA1 guidance_NN1 available_JJ in_II the_AT literature_NN1 as_II21 to_II22 which_DDQ scales_NN2 are_VBR the_AT most_RRT construct_VV0 valid_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO job_NN1 demands_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 approach_NN1 ,_, 1_MC1 )_) the_AT information_NN1 for_IF each_DD1 block_NN1 is_VBZ equally_RR apportioned_VVN to_II all_DB segments_NN2 that_CST are_VBR adjacent_II21 to_II22 the_AT block_NN1 ;_; 2_MC )_) for_IF each_DD1 segment_NN1 ,_, the_AT information_NN1 from_II each_DD1 block_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ adjacent_JJ is_VBZ averaged_VVN to_TO compute_VVI estimates_NN2 at_II the_AT segment_NN1 level_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS in_II recent_JJ times_NNT2 researchers_NN2 are_VBR gaining_VVG new_JJ information_NN1 on_II the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II the_AT variables_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 study_NN1 ,_, the_AT joint_JJ analysis_NN1 of_IO indicators_NN2 of_IO psychological_JJ and_CC social_JJ adjustment_NN1 from_II environmental_JJ contingencies_NN2 and_CC psychological_JJ characteristics_NN2 is_VBZ limited_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, a_AT1 researcher_NN1 can_VM be_VBI wrong_JJ about_II whether_CSW a_AT1 null_JJ hypothesis_NN1 is_VBZ true_JJ or_CC false_JJ (_( traditional_JJ Type_NN1 I_ZZ1 and_CC II_MC errors_NN2 )_) ,_, and_CC they_PPHS2 may_VM also_RR make_VVI the_AT error_NN1 of_IO concluding_VVG that_CST a_AT1 null_JJ hypothesis_NN1 is_VBZ true_JJ or_CC not_XX true_JJ despite_II poor_JJ evidence_NN1 (_( Types_NN2 III_MC and_CC IV_MC errors_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ a_AT1 lengthy_JJ introduction_NN1 that_CST begs_VVZ for_IF greater_JJR explanation_NN1 of_IO method_NN1 in_II madness_NN1 and_CC madness_NN1 in_II method_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Besides_RR ,_, decision-making_JJ circuits_NN2 responsible_JJ for_IF activating_VVG innate_JJ social_JJ behaviors_NN2 share_VV0 common_JJ neural_JJ substrates_NN2 in_II both_DB2 Drosophila_NP1 melanogaster_NN1 and_CC mice_NN2 (_( Gelperin_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_ZZ1 1standarddeviation_FO increase_VV0 in_II crime_NN1 was_VBDZ associated_VVN with_IW an_AT1 87_MC percent_NNU increase_NN1 in_II the_AT odds_NN2 of_IO reincarceration_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 will_VM help_VVI to_TO identify_VVI how_RGQ much_DA1 variation_NN1 in_II age_NN1 at_II death_NN1 traditional_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO socioeconomic_JJ inequality_NN1 are_VBR unable_JK to_TO capture_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Mechanistically_RR ,_, dopamine_NN1 could_VM attribute_VVI aberrant_JJ salience_NN1 to_II sensory_JJ or_CC mnemonic_JJ events_NN2 by_II gating_VVG these_DD2 events_NN2 to_II PFC_NP1 or_CC by_II altering_VVG the_AT properties_NN2 of_IO PFC_NP1 networks_NN2 to_TO allow_VVI switching_VVG between_II representations_NN2 (_( see_VV0 main_JJ text_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT remaining_JJ five_MC items_NN2 were_VBDR as_CSA follows_VVZ :_: '_NULL If_CS enough_DD people_NN in_II Ukraine_NP1 got_VVD organized_VVN and_CC demanded_VVD change_NN1 ,_, politicians_NN2 would_VM take_VVI steps_NN2 to_TO end_VVI the_AT problem_NN1 European_JJ integration_NN1 in_II31 favour_II32 of_II33 protesters_NN2 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL Organized_VVD groups_NN2 of_IO citizens_NN2 can_VM have_VHI much_DA1 impact_NN1 on_II the_AT political_JJ policies_NN2 in_II Ukraine_NP1 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL Politicians_NN2 would_VM respond_VVI to_II our_APPGE needs_NN2 if_CS we_PPIS2 began_VVD a_AT1 social_JJ movement_NN1 of_IO European_JJ integration_NN1 '_NULL ,_, '_NULL Politicians_NN2 would_VM respond_VVI to_II needs_NN2 of_IO citizens_NN2 if_CS enough_DD people_NN demanded_VVD change_NN1 '_NULL ,_, and_CC '_NULL Politicians_NN2 would_VM listen_VVI to_II the_AT protesters_NN2 if_CS we_PPIS2 pressured_VVD them_PPHO2 to_II '_NULL ,_, =_FO .85_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 paper_NN1 we_PPIS2 use_VV0 the_AT terms_NN2 treatment_NN1 ,_, therapy_NN1 ,_, intervention_NN1 ,_, training_NN1 ,_, and_CC rehabilitation_NN1 interchangeably_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Summary_NN1 statistics_NN (_( number_NN1 ,_, mean_VV0 ,_, and_CC SD_NP1 for_IF continuous_JJ variables_NN2 ;_; number_NN1 and_CC percentage_NN1 of_IO patients_NN2 in_II each_DD1 category_NN1 for_IF categorical_JJ variables_NN2 )_) are_VBR provided_VVN for_IF variables_NN2 evaluated_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Empirical_JJ literature_NN1 on_II the_AT impact_NN1 of_IO child_NN1 sexual_JJ abuse_NN1 on_II mentalization_NN1 is_VBZ practically_RR non-existent_JJ ,_, but_CCB based_VVN on_II previous_JJ findings_NN2 with_IW children_NN2 exposed_VVN to_II physical_JJ abuse_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 will_VM test_VVI the_AT hypothesis_NN1 that_CST ,_, as_CSA compared_VVN to_II matched_JJ controls_NN2 ,_, sexually_RR abused_VVN children_NN2 will_VM have_VHI poorer_JJR RF_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT size_NN1 of_IO the_AT sample_NN1 and_CC that_DD1 non-normal_JJ distributions_NN2 were_VBDR assumed_VVN ,_, we_PPIS2 used_VVD non-parametric_JJ statistics_NN for_IF data_NN treatment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT reliability_NN1 of_IO measures_NN2 could_VM be_VBI assessed_VVN for_IF two_MC antenatal_JJ measures_NN2 only_RR because_CS information_NN1 for_IF the_AT remaining_JJ antenatal_JJ measures_NN2 was_VBDZ not_XX available_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Children_NN2 ,_, therefore_RR ,_, experienced_VVD great_JJ difficulty_NN1 in_II moderating_VVG the_AT negative_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO gaze_NN1 maintenance_NN1 ,_, with_IW looking_VVG towards_II a_AT1 face_NN1 resulting_VVG not_XX only_RR in_II increased_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO cognitive_JJ demand_NN1 for_IF children_NN2 ,_, but_CCB also_RR diminished_VVN task_NN1 performance_NN1 (_( Doherty-Sneddon_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_DD1 bottom-up_NN1 attentional_JJ effects_NN2 can_VM be_VBI modulated_VVN by_II one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 future_JJ plans_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT plan_NN1 to_TO respond_VVI to_II a_AT1 certain_JJ target_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 item_NN1 was_VBDZ used_JJ to_II measure_NN1 perceived_VVD risk_NN1 with_IW responses_NN2 on_II a_AT1 6-point_JJ Likert_NP1 scale_NN1 :_: "_" How_RGQ susceptible_JJ do_VD0 you_PPY feel_VVI you_PPY are_VBR to_II contracting_VVG an_AT1 STI_NN1 ?_? "_" 
</s>
<s>
Across_II studies_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 robust_JJ finding_NN1 supporting_VVG this_DD1 assertion_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 resistance_NN1 to_TO change_VVI is_VBZ directly_RR related_VVN to_II the_AT baseline_NN1 magnitude_NN1 and_CC rate_NN1 of_IO reinforcement_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR judges_VVZ who_PNQS hear_VV0 pleas_NN2 are_VBR all_DB on_II the_AT same_DA page_NN1 as_CSA far_RR as_CSA acceptable_JJ ranges_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Detailed_JJ information_NN1 can_VM be_VBI found_VVN in_II the_AT supplementary_JJ material_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Manipulating_VVG people_NN '_NULL s_ZZ1 metacognitive_JJ beliefs_NN2 about_II the_AT validity_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE implicit_JJ associations_NN2 shifted_VVD whether_CSW implicit_JJ Black-poor_JJ associations_NN2 predicted_VVD support_NN1 for_IF wealth_NN1 redistribution_NN1 (_( Study_NN1 3_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, it_PPH1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 belief_NN1 that_CST legitimized_VVD income_NN1 inequality_NN1 that_CST revealed_VVD yielded_JJ status_NN1 differences_NN2 in_II legitimacy_NN1 along_II the_AT dimension_NN1 of_IO income_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT MBN_NP1 ,_, pause_NN1 frequency_NN1 in_II the_AT AD_NN1 participants_NN2 was_VBDZ positively_RR correlated_VVN with_IW and_CC predicted_VVN by_II their_APPGE memory_NN1 performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Together_RL we_PPIS2 designed_VVD a_AT1 seminar_NN1 that_CST would_VM introduce_VVI participants_NN2 to_II a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO theoretical_JJ and_CC practical_JJ issues_NN2 in_II the_AT design_NN1 and_CC implementation_NN1 of_IO feminisms_NN2 ,_, antiracist_NN1 organizing_VVG ,_, and_CC PAR_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA can_VM be_VBI observed_VVN in_II Table_NN1 2_MC ,_, the_AT participants_NN2 made_VVD fewer_DAR false_JJ alarm_NN1 errors_NN2 ,_, by_II pressing_VVG the_AT n-back_NN1 key_NN1 ,_, during_II the_AT 2-back_NN1 task_NN1 than_CSN the_AT 3-back_NN1 task_NN1 for_IF all_DB stimuli_NN2 type_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT age_NN1 26_MC AAI_NP1 transcripts_NN2 were_VBDR coded_VVN by_II raters_NN2 who_PNQS had_VHD completed_VVN reliability_NN1 certification_NN1 with_IW Dr._NNB Mary_NP1 Main_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 lab_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Qonset_NN1 ,_, Ronset_NP1 ,_, QRonset_NP1 ,_, and_CC QRS_NP1 duration_NN1 became_VVD longer_RRR with_IW a_AT1 higher_JJR age_NN1 of_IO the_AT participants_NN2 (_( .05_MC <_FO rage_NN1 <_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT second_MD author_NN1 posted_VVD an_AT1 invitation_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 participant_NN1 in_II online_JJ social_JJ media_NN and_CC social_JJ networking_NN1 websites_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Facebook_NP1 ,_, Twitter_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Figure_NN1 3_MC shows_VVZ the_AT effect_NN1 size_NN1 of_IO studies_NN2 using_VVG the_AT FMPS_NP1 CM_NNU subscale_NN1 and_CC the_AT pooled_JJ estimate_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indirect_JJ support_NN1 for_IF the_AT role_NN1 of_IO behavioural_JJ simulation_NN1 in_II the_AT QBE_NN1 is_VBZ provided_VVN by_II demonstrations_NN2 that_CST ease_NN1 of_IO representation_NN1 influences_VVZ the_AT effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Insight_NN1 into_II illness_NN1 has_VHZ also_RR been_VBN shown_VVN to_TO facilitate_VVI consumer-provider_JJ communication_NN1 and_CC promote_VVI better_JJR personal_JJ recovery_NN1 (_( Chan_NP1 and_CC Mak_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Lysaker_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, while_CS negatively_RR predict_VV0 self-esteem_NN1 and_CC quality_NN1 of_IO life_NN1 (_( Hasson-Ohayon_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Staring_VVG et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO address_VVI this_DD1 gap_NN1 in_II the_AT current_JJ study_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 first_MD summarise_VV0 the_AT different_JJ interview_NN1 and_CC questionnaire_NN1 measures_VVZ available_JJ to_TO tap_VVI into_II expectant_JJ parents_NN2 '_NULL thoughts_NN2 and_CC feelings_NN2 about_II the_AT unborn_JJ infant_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 will_VM now_RT proceed_VVI to_II a_AT1 step-by-step_JJ elaboration_NN1 of_IO the_AT model_NN1 ,_, accompanied_VVN with_IW illustrative_JJ excerpts_NN2 drawn_VVN from_II one_MC1 episode_NN1 in_II a_AT1 specific_JJ dyad_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
MS_NN1 (_( vs._II uncertainty_NN1 and_CC music_NN1 salience_NN1 )_) led_VVD to_TO lower_VVI reports_NN2 of_IO meaning_VVG in_II life_NN1 when_RRQ participants_NN2 were_VBDR induced_VVN to_TO feel_VVI closer_RRR to_II completing_VVG a_AT1 long-term_JJ goal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO be_VBI included_VVN here_RL ,_, empirical_JJ studies_NN2 assessing_VVG the_AT accuracy_NN1 of_IO stereotypes_NN2 needed_VVN to_TO meet_VVI two_MC major_JJ criteria_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA noted_VVN above_RL ,_, all_DB surveys_NN2 and_CC scales_NN2 are_VBR potentially_RR prone_JJ to_II image_NN1 management_NN1 or_CC "_" faking_NN1 "_" of_IO answers_NN2 ,_, aimed_VVN at_II providing_VVG a_AT1 more_RGR socially_RR acceptable_JJ response_NN1 than_CSN the_AT genuine_JJ one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
During_II the_AT picture-based_JJ narrative_NN1 ,_, the_AT participants_NN2 with_IW AD_NN1 had_VHD a_AT1 significantly_RR lower_JJR speech_NN1 rate_NN1 ,_, and_CC produced_VVD longer_RRR and_CC more_RGR frequent_JJ pauses_NN2 (_( Table_NN1 1_MC1 and_CC Fig._NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB targets_NN2 portrayed_VVN a_AT1 neutral_JJ face_NN1 and_CC four_MC emotional_JJ faces_NN2 :_: angry_JJ ,_, fearful_JJ ,_, happy_JJ ,_, and_CC sad_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, the_AT child_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX need_VVI to_TO be_VBI aware_JJ of_IO the_AT purpose_NN1 of_IO the_AT higher_JJR level_JJ goal_NN1 to_TO abstract_VVI the_AT relevant_JJ event_NN1 structure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ also_RR possible_JJ that_CST children_NN2 may_VM prioritise_VVI the_AT primary_JJ task_NN1 ,_, sacrificing_VVG their_APPGE performance_NN1 on_II the_AT secondary_JJ task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 were_VBDR consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT theoretical_JJ understanding_NN1 that_CST the_AT early_JJ sessions_NNT2 of_IO CBT_NP1 profoundly_RR benefit_VV0 the_AT client_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 immediate_JJ mood_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 ultimate_JJ outcome_NN1 ,_, and_CC that_CST in_II contrast_NN1 ,_, the_AT early_JJ sessions_NNT2 of_IO PIT_NN1 are_VBR less_RGR positive_JJ but_CCB may_VM provide_VVI the_AT foundation_NN1 for_IF gains_NN2 made_VVN in_II later_JJR stages_NN2 of_IO treatment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Numerous_JJ follow-up_JJ studies_NN2 ,_, however_RR ,_, recognized_VVD this_DD1 limitation_NN1 and_CC addressed_VVD it_PPH1 either_RR by_II allowing_VVG people_NN to_TO make_VVI up_RP their_APPGE own_DA questions_NN2 or_CC to_TO select_VVI from_II both_DB2 leading_VVG and_CC diagnostic_JJ questions_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Devine_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1990_MC ;_; Trope_NP1 &;_NULL Bassok_NP1 1982_MC ;_; 1983_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Its_APPGE capacity_NN1 for_IF maintaining_VVG information_NN1 accessibility_NN1 is_VBZ limited_VVN ,_, and_CC this_DD1 limit_NN1 constitutes_VVZ an_AT1 important_JJ constraint_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE cognitive_JJ performance_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Both_DB2 approaches_NN2 (_( clustering_NN1 and_CC classification_NN1 )_) conduct_VV0 multivariate_JJ pattern_NN1 analysis_NN1 (_( MVPA_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RR ,_, for_IF durative_JJ events_NN2 in_II mass_JJ syntax_NN1 ,_, predictions_NN2 are_VBR not_XX quite_RG as_RG straightforward_JJ :_: The_AT professor_NN1 advised_VVD her_APPGE student_NN1 consists_VVZ of_IO many_DA2 individual_JJ advising_VVG situations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ easy_JJ to_TO see_VVI how_RGQ highly_RR emotional_JJ and_CC accessible_JJ memories_NN2 from_II the_AT past_NN1 become_VV0 the_AT dominant_JJ basis_NN1 for_IF maladaptive_JJ responses_NN2 in_II novel_JJ circumstances_NN2 that_CST share_VV0 some_DD characteristics_NN2 with_IW the_AT original_JJ distressing_JJ event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Four_MC additional_JJ children_NN2 were_VBDR tested_VVN but_CCB excluded_VVD from_II analysis_NN1 and_CC replaced_VVN due_II21 to_II22 experimenter_NN1 error_NN1 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 2_MC )_) and_CC interference_NN1 from_II siblings_NN2 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 in_II Model_NN1 3_MC supported_VVD the_AT mediation_NN1 hypothesis_NN1 :_: the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO care_NN1 retained_VVD its_APPGE significant_JJ association_NN1 with_IW giving_VVG (_( B_ZZ1 =_FO $3.17_NNU ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .04_MC )_) ,_, but_CCB the_AT empathic_JJ concern_NN1 point_NN1 estimate_NN1 dropped_VVD to_TO near_VVI zero_MC (_( B_ZZ1 =_FO $.01_NNU ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .99_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, as_CSA normal_JJ work_NN1 schedules_NN2 among_II team_NN1 members_NN2 fail_VV0 to_TO overlap_VVI (_( temporal_JJ dispersion_NN1 increases_VVZ )_) ,_, mental_JJ models_NN2 will_VM need_VVI to_TO reflect_VVI an_AT1 understanding_NN1 of_IO those_DD2 team_NN1 members_NN2 who_PNQS overlap_VV0 and_CC those_DD2 with_IW the_AT ability_NN1 to_TO monitor_VVI particular_JJ team_NN1 members_NN2 in_II real_JJ time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 completed_VVD a_AT1 procedure_NN1 similar_JJ to_II that_DD1 of_IO Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, incorporating_VVG covariates_NN2 into_II the_AT model_NN1 ,_, when_CS these_DD2 are_VBR available_JJ ,_, is_VBZ straightforward_JJ by_II adjusting_VVG the_AT linear_JJ predictor_NN1 accordingly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Coders_NP1 who_PNQS did_VDD not_XX pass_VVI this_DD1 second_NNT1 test_NN1 were_VBDR assigned_VVN to_II other_JJ responsibilities_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR over_II time_NNT1 ,_, with_IW focused_JJ and_CC concerted_JJ organizing_JJ efforts_NN2 that_CST coalesce_VV0 in_II social_JJ movements_NN2 ,_, can_VM this_DD1 begin_VVI to_TO occur_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
Those_DD2 two_MC measures_NN2 provided_VVN estimates_NN2 of_IO postural_JJ in-stability_NN1 (_( stability11_FO )_) and_CC movement_NN1 variability_NN1 ,_, respectively_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, several_DA2 limitations_NN2 should_VM be_VBI noted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 statements_NN2 asked_VVD participants_NN2 the_AT following_JJ (_( Cronbach_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 =_FO 0.716_MC )_) :_: 1_MC1 )_) "_" How_RGQ often_RR do_VD0 you_PPY worry_VVI about_II being_VBG physically_RR attacked_VVN by_II stranger_NN1 in_II your_APPGE neighborhood_NN1 ?_? "_" 2_MC )_) "_" How_RGQ often_RR do_VD0 you_PPY worry_VVI about_II someone_PN1 breaking_VVG into_II your_APPGE home_NN1 and_CC stealing_VVG your_APPGE property_NN1 ?_? "_" 3_MC )_) "_" How_RRQ safe_JJ do_VD0 you_PPY think_VVI your_APPGE neighborhood_NN1 is_VBZ from_II crime_NN1 and_CC criminals_NN2 ?_? "_" and_CC 4_MC )_) "_" As_CS31 far_CS32 as_CS33 crime_NN1 in_II your_APPGE neighborhood_NN1 is_VBZ concerned_JJ ,_, how_RGQ much_DA1 you_PPY worry_VV0 about_II the_AT safety_NN1 of_IO you_PPY ,_, yourself_PPX1 ?_? "_" 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 brief_RR22 ,_, to_TO calculate_VVI the_AT SIC_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 divide_VV0 the_AT time_NNT1 scale_NN1 into_II bins_NN2 (_( say_VV0 ,_, of_IO 10_MC ms_NN1 each_DD1 )_) and_CC calculate_VV0 the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO responses_NN2 given_VVN within_II each_DD1 time_NNT1 bin_NN1 ,_, to_TO produce_VVI an_AT1 approximation_NN1 to_II the_AT density_NN1 function_NN1 ,_, f(t)_NNU ,_, and_CC the_AT cumulative_JJ probability_NN1 function_NN1 ,_, F(t)_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ results_NN2 indicating_VVG a_AT1 minimal_JJ role_NN1 of_IO phonology_NN1 in_II the_AT masked_JJ priming_NN1 of_IO letter_NN1 strings_NN2 in_II the_AT sequential_JJ match_NN1 is_VBZ thus_RR entirely_RR in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 the_AT view_NN1 that_CST letter_NN1 match_NN1 is_VBZ based_VVN on_II an_AT1 abstract_JJ letter_NN1 code_NN1 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 a_AT1 phonological_JJ code_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nearly_RR two-thirds_MF identified_JJ as_CSA gay_JJ or_CC lesbian_NN1 (_( 61.3_MC %_NNU )_) ;_; 27.2_MC %_NNU identified_VVN as_CSA bisexual_JJ ;_; and_CC 11.6_MC %_NNU identified_VVN as_CSA queer_JJ ,_, questioning_VVG ,_, or_CC another_DD1 sexual_JJ orientation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT pretest_NN1 ,_, the_AT mean_JJ values_NN2 of_IO plausibility_NN1 for_IF the_AT 30%_NNU price_NN1 discount_NN1 indicated_VVD that_CST approximately_RR 6_MC =_FO "_" plausible_JJ "_" (_( M30%_FO =_FO 5.70_MC )_) ,_, for_IF the_AT 60%_NNU price_NN1 discount_NN1 4_MC =_FO "_" might_VM or_CC might_VM not_XX be_VBI plausible_JJ "_" (_( M60%_FO =_FO 4.07_MC )_) ,_, and_CC for_IF the_AT 90%_NNU price_NN1 discount_NN1 ,_, between_II 2_MC =_FO "_" probably_RR not_XX plausible_JJ "_" and_CC 3_MC =_FO "_" somewhat_RR probably_RR not_XX plausible_JJ "_" (_( M90%_FO =_FO 2.70_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT category_NN1 refers_VVZ to_II the_AT occurrence_NN1 of_IO emotion_NN1 words_NN2 in_II the_AT narratives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II some_DD of_IO our_APPGE studies_NN2 we_PPIS2 did_VDD explicitly_RR evaluate_VVI the_AT participant_NN1 by_II an_AT1 experimenter_NN1 of_IO the_AT opposite_JJ sex_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS we_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX in_II other_JJ studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 similar_JJ analysis_NN1 of_IO variance_NN1 undertaken_VVN for_IF the_AT Subject/Experimenter_NN1 task_NN1 also_RR revealed_VVN an_AT1 externalizing_JJ bias_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 groups_NN2 :_: F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 30_MC )_) =_FO 42.594_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ,_, p2_FO =_FO .587_MC ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST participants_NN2 were_VBDR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO ascribe_VVI a_AT1 word-pair_NN spoken_VVN by_II themselves_PPX2 to_II the_AT experimenter_NN1 than_CSN they_PPHS2 were_VBDR a_AT1 word-pair_NN spoken_VVN by_II the_AT experimenter_NN1 to_II themselves_PPX2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT dynamic_JJ classification_NN1 strategy_NN1 consists_VVZ of_IO constructing_VVG mutually_RR exclusive_JJ categories_NN2 of_IO offenders_NN2 based_VVN on_II their_APPGE individual-level_JJ patterns_NN2 of_IO offending_VVG at_II one_MC1 point_NN1 in_II time_NNT1 ,_, and_CC comparing_VVG the_AT stability_NN1 or_CC change_NN1 of_IO categorization_NN1 at_II another_DD1 point_NN1 in_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Eighty-one_MC participants_NN2 were_VBDR recruited_VVN via_II Prolific_JJ Academic_NN1 (_( Peer_VV0 ,_, Samat_NP1 ,_, Brandimarte_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Acquisti_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) and_CC completed_VVD the_AT experiment_NN1 online_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_CS a_AT1 jittered_JJ 1000-_NN1 to_II 1400-ms_JJ blank_JJ interval_NN1 ,_, the_AT warning_NN1 cue_NN1 for_IF the_AT next_MD trial_NN1 appeared_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 pattern_NN1 of_IO results_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST spontaneous_JJ VSP_NP1 taking_VVG crucially_RR relies_VVZ on_II the_AT confederate_NN1 being_VBG perceived_VVN as_II an_AT1 intentional_JJ coactor_NN1 (_( cf._VV0 P2i_FO :_: As_CS31 far_CS32 as_CS33 safety_NN1 I_PPIS1 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 care_VV0 anymore_RR sometime&lsqb;s&rsqb;_VV0 I_PPIS1 wish_VV0 it_PPH1 was_VBDZ over_RP with_IW ._. 
</s>
<s>
How_RGQ much_DA1 does_VDZ the_AT content_NN1 or_CC detailed_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT information_NN1 presented_VVN in_II the_AT domain_NN1 of_IO intervention_NN1 matter_NN1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ possible_JJ that_CST miscarriages_NN2 and_CC stillbirths_NN2 were_VBDR considered_VVN as_CSA child_NN1 deaths_NN2 for_IF some_DD women_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF DUI_NP1 ,_, we_PPIS2 randomized_VVD whether_CSW participants_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN if_CS they_PPHS2 knew_VVD someone_PN1 who_PNQS had_VHD gotten_VVN away_RL with_IW driving_JJ drunk_JJ (_( avoidance_NN1 prime_JJ )_) or_CC knew_VVD someone_PN1 who_PNQS had_VHD received_VVN a_AT1 DUI_JJ ticket_NN1 (_( punishment_NN1 prime_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reducing_VVG participant_NN1 burden_NN1 dictated_VVD the_AT reduction_NN1 in_II items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE findings_NN2 are_VBR broadly_RR in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 earlier_JJR reviews_NN2 that_CST indicated_VVD that_CST C_ZZ1 +_FO ECT_NP1 was_VBDZ an_AT1 efficacious_JJ and_CC safe_JJ treatment_NN1 for_IF clozapine_NN1 refractory_JJ psychosis_NN1 (_( Havaki-Kontaxaki_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Kupchik_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2000_MC )_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Locally_RR ,_, data_NN are_VBR situated_VVN within_II a_AT1 research_NN1 project_NN1 exploring_VVG public_JJ responses_NN2 to_II humanitarian_JJ communications_NN2 and_CC ,_, within_II that_DD1 context_NN1 ,_, individual_JJ extracts_NN2 are_VBR situated_VVN in_II the_AT sequential_JJ environment_NN1 (_( Potter_NP1 &;_NULL Hepburn_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) of_IO a_AT1 focus_NN1 group_NN1 discussion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_II what_DDQ extent_NN1 do_VD0 the_AT data_NN support_VVI our_APPGE hypotheses_NN2 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, meta-analytic_JJ effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 were_VBDR calculated_VVN both_RR with_IW and_CC without_IW studies_NN2 using_VVG historiometric_JJ measures_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, idiosyncratic_JJ archival_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO narcissism_NN1 and_CC leadership_NN1 that_CST frequently_RR use_VV0 undergraduate_NN1 ratings_NN2 of_IO narcissism_NN1 and/or_CC leadership_NN1 based_VVN on_II a_AT1 profile_NN1 prepared_VVN by_II the_AT study_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 authors_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Either_DD1 way_NN1 ,_, the_AT increased_JJ activity_NN1 confers_VVZ a_AT1 benefit_NN1 only_RR by_II virtue_NN1 of_IO its_APPGE suppression_NN1 of_IO competitors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT strongest_JJT version_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 account_NN1 predicts_VVZ that_CST there_EX will_VM be_VBI no_AT cross-modal_JJ priming_NN1 ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, when_CS the_AT ambiguous_JJ word_NN1 is_VBZ presented_VVN in_II different_JJ modalities_NN2 in_II the_AT prime_JJ and_CC test_VV0 exposures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT middle_JJ column_NN1 lists_VVZ practices_NN2 that_CST can_VM increase_VVI Type_NN1 I_ZZ1 and_CC Type_NN1 III_MC errors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT three-level_NN1 ,_, ordinal_JJ perceived_JJ risk_NN1 groups_NN2 were_VBDR created_VVN based_VVN on_II grouping_NN1 Likert_NP1 responses_NN2 to_II the_AT perceived_JJ risk_NN1 item-Very_JJ susceptible_JJ (_( 5-6_MCMC )_) ,_, Somewhat_RR susceptible_JJ (_( 2-4_MCMC )_) ,_, and_CC Not_XX susceptible_JJ (_( 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 then_RT used_VVD this_DD1 data_NN to_TO investigate_VVI two_MC further_JJR questions_NN2 about_II how_RRQ participants_NN2 were_VBDR completing_VVG our_APPGE task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 5_MC presents_VVZ the_AT 2SLS_FO estimates_VVZ for_IF the_AT treatment_NN1 variable_NN1 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT interaction_NN1 terms_NN2 with_IW age_NN1 ,_, for_IF a_AT1 subsequent_JJ arrest_NN1 in_II 1_MC1 year_NNT1 (_( panel_NN1 A_ZZ1 )_) and_CC in_II 3_MC years_NNT2 (_( panel_NN1 B_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 line_II32 with_II33 this_DD1 theory_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX find_VVI any_DD differences_NN2 in_II self-other_JJ discrimination_NN1 following_VVG cathodal_JJ stimulation_NN1 of_IO the_AT temporoparietal_JJ area_NN1 ,_, but_CCB instead_RR observed_VVN a_AT1 selective_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO anodal_JJ stimulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT analyses_NN2 revealed_VVD significant_JJ although_CS small_JJ indirect_JJ effects_NN2 from_II early_JJ language_NN1 competencies_NN2 to_II later_JJR metamemory_JJ knowledge_NN1 at_II the_AT age_NN1 of_IO 5_MC ;_; 2_MC (_( Time_NNT1 5_MC )_) ,_, mediated_VVN by_II theory-of-mind_JJ understanding_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 obtained_VVD online_JJ questionnaires_NN2 from_II 339_MC active_JJ football_NN1 and_CC futsal_NN1 referees_NN2 within_II the_AT National_JJ and_CC Professional_JJ league_NN1 at_II two_MC distinct_JJ points_NN2 (_( April_NPM1 and_CC May_NPM1 )_) within_II the_AT football_NN1 season_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO identified_JJ parameters_NN2 for_IF the_AT MC-FA_NP1 model_NN1 is_VBZ formally_RR proved_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 possibility_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT testimony_NN1 itself_PPX1 is_VBZ sufficiently_RR consistent_JJ across_II different_JJ informants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bas_NN2 are_VBR contexts_NN2 where_RRQ relationships_NN2 are_VBR forged_VVN and_CC interactions_NN2 occur_VV0 ,_, and_CC include_VV0 project_NN1 meetings_NN2 ,_, training_NN1 programs_NN2 ,_, ad_JJ21 hoc_JJ22 study_NN1 groups_NN2 ,_, informal_JJ hobby_NN1 groups_NN2 ,_, conferences_NN2 ,_, company-sponsored_JJ family_NN1 or_CC sports_NN2 events_NN2 ,_, cafés_NN2 and_CC canteens_NN2 ,_, virtual_JJ meetings_NN2 ,_, intranet_NN1 systems_NN2 ,_, and_CC blogs_NN2 (_( Nonaka_NP1 &;_NULL Takeuchi_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Overall_RR ,_, these_DD2 findings_NN2 are_VBR consistent_JJ with_IW previous_JJ cross-sectional_JJ research_NN1 examining_VVG genetic_JJ and_CC environmental_JJ influences_NN2 on_II psychopathic_JJ personality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 2_MC presents_VVZ the_AT descriptive_JJ statistics_NN for_IF all_DB relevant_JJ variables_NN2 at_II each_DD1 measurement_NN1 point_NN1 including_II age_NN1 ,_, language_NN1 ,_, and_CC nonverbal_JJ competencies_NN2 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 theory-of-mind_JJ understanding_NN1 and_CC metamemory_JJ knowledge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, the_AT Independent_JJ Race_NN1 Model_NN1 posits_VVZ that_CST go_VV0 and_CC stop_VV0 processes_NN2 operate_VV0 independently_RR regardless_RR of_IO the_AT SSD_NP1 (_( Logan_NP1 &;_NULL Cowan_NP1 ,_, 1984_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO account_VVI for_IF this_DD1 ,_, the_AT results_NN2 in_II Table_NN1 2_MC is_VBZ re-estimated_VVN using_VVG ,_, instead_RR ,_, Weighted_VVD Least_DAT Squares_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, and_CC more_RGR subtle_JJ ,_, the_AT persistency_NN1 with_IW which_DDQ the_AT preferred_JJ hand_NN1 is_VBZ used_VVN over_II a_AT1 wide_JJ range_NN1 of_IO tasks_NN2 gives_VVZ us_PPIO2 an_AT1 indication_NN1 of_IO the_AT strength_NN1 of_IO the_AT handedness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, both_DB2 parties_NN2 also_RR seek_VV0 to_TO secure_VVI potentially_RR shared_JJ objectives_NN2 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 the_AT continued_JJ survival_NN1 of_IO the_AT firm_NN1 (_( Edwards_NP1 ,_, Bélanger_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Wright_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ,_, generating_VVG opportunities_NN2 for_IF co-operation_NN1 (_( Dobbins_NP1 &;_NULL Dundon_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC ;_; Edwards_NP1 &;_NULL Ram_NN1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) and_CC organizational_JJ efficiency_NN1 (_( Johnstone_NP1 &;_NULL Wilkinson_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT total_JJ model_NN1 accounted_VVN for_IF 11.5%_FO of_IO the_AT variance_NN1 ,_, of_IO which_DDQ 0.5%_FO was_VBDZ accounted_VVN for_IF by_II maternal_JJ and_CC paternal_JJ parenting_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thelen_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1993_MC ;_; Van_NP1 Hof_NP1 ,_, Van_NP1 der_NP1 Kamp_NP1 &;_NULL Savelsbergh_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC ;_; Von_NP1 Hofsten_NP1 ,_, 1984_MC ,_, 1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_ZZ1 Bayes_VVZ factors_NN2 analysis_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 interaction_NN1 effect_NN1 yielded_VVD a_AT1 BF_NP1 01_MC =_FO 6.83_MC ,_, thus_RR indicating_VVG that_CST our_APPGE experiment_NN1 yielded_VVD moderate_JJ evidence_NN1 for_IF the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 interaction_NN1 effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II that_DD1 study_NN1 of_IO privately-insured_JJ adults_NN2 ,_, 64%_NNU of_IO the_AT sample_NN1 had_VHD experienced_VVN at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 ACE_NN1 prior_II21 to_II22 their_APPGE eighteenth_MD birthday_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II sum_NN1 ,_, the_AT second_MD hypothesis_NN1 was_VBDZ confirmed_VVN :_: trait_NN1 anxiety_NN1 and_CC TBR_NP1 (_( attentional_JJ control_NN1 )_) are_VBR interactively_RR related_VVN to_II differential_JJ attentional_JJ responding_VVG to_II stimuli_NN2 of_IO low_JJ and_CC high_JJ threat_NN1 level_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO messages_NN2 can_VM depend_VVI on_II multiple_JJ properties_NN2 of_IO the_AT receiver_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Behavioral_JJ studies_NN2 in_II musicians_NN2 go_VV0 in_II the_AT same_DA direction_NN1 :_: there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 higher_JJR frequency_NN1 of_IO left-handers_NN2 among_II proficient_JJ musicians_NN2 (_( Jancke_NP1 ,_, Schlaug_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Steinmetz_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC )_) ,_, highlighting_VVG the_AT links_NN2 between_II handedness_NN1 and_CC hemispheric_JJ specialization_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 task_NN1 was_VBDZ designed_VVN to_TO assess_VVI perception_NN1 of_IO prosodic_JJ inflection_NN1 in_II speech_NN1 with_IW preserved_JJ lexical_JJ content_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF studies_NN2 using_VVG different_JJ tasks_NN2 than_CSN those_DD2 used_VVN by_II Ophir_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2009_MC )_) ,_, we_PPIS2 selected_VVD the_AT outcome_NN1 measure_VV0 that_RG best_RRT reflected_VVN the_AT participant_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 performance_NN1 in_II the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO environmental_JJ ,_, memory-based_NN1 ,_, or_CC task-set_NN1 based_VVN distraction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Italian_JJ grapheme_NN1 a_AT1 ,_, for_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, almost_RR always_RR maps_NN2 onto_II the_AT phoneme_NN1 /a/_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 patterns_NN2 also_RR suggest_VV0 that_CST ,_, by_II ignoring_VVG individual_JJ differences_NN2 ,_, the_AT benefits_NN2 of_IO contact_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN historically_RR underestimated_VVN (_( Hodson_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Hodson_NP1 ,_, Hogg_NP1 ,_, et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, with_IW clear_JJ implications_NN2 for_IF policy_NN1 implementation_NN1 and_CC education_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nonetheless_RR ,_, empirical_JJ tests_NN2 of_IO the_AT generalizability_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE results_NN2 are_VBR desirable_JJ together_RL with_IW further_JJR studies_NN2 that_CST directly_RR address_VV0 the_AT range_NN1 of_IO alternative_JJ accounts_NN2 suggested_VVN by_II the_AT reviewer_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Like_II previous_JJ research_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 limitation_NN1 of_IO Study_NN1 1_MC1 was_VBDZ that_CST it_PPH1 did_VDD not_XX extend_VVI empirical_JJ support_NN1 for_IF the_AT hypotheses_NN2 beyond_II the_AT American_JJ population_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ also_RR an_AT1 interaction_NN1 between_II target_NN1 and_CC distance_NN1 to_TO view_VVI ,_, with_IW the_AT target_NN1 directly_RR in_II the_AT middle_NN1 and_CC the_AT two_MC farthest_JJT targets_NN2 showing_VVG the_AT least_DAT sensitivity_NN1 to_II the_AT distance_NN1 to_TO view_VVI (_( Fig_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A4_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT means_NN and_CC standard_JJ deviations_NN2 of_IO these_DD2 ratings_NN2 are_VBR shown_VVN in_II Table_NN1 5_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT work_NN1 of_IO WPMvdW_NP1 and_CC KRR_NP1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN by_II grants_NN2 from_II the_AT Netherlands_NP1 Organisation_NN1 for_IF Scientific_JJ Research_NN1 (_( NWO_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 were_VBDR instructed_VVN that_CST the_AT number_NN1 presented_VVN alongside_II each_DD1 word_NN1 represented_VVD the_AT importance_NN1 (_( or_CC value_NN1 )_) of_IO remembering_VVG that_DD1 word_NN1 (_( with_IW values_NN2 ranging_VVG from_II 1_MC1 to_II 10_MC )_) ,_, of_IO which_DDQ would_VM be_VBI awarded_VVN to_II the_AT participant_NN1 if_CS the_AT accompanying_JJ word_NN1 was_VBDZ correctly_RR recalled_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Detection_NN1 Rates_NN2 of_IO PPC_NP1 Overall_NN1 ,_, detection_NN1 rates_NN2 of_IO PPC_NP1 were_VBDR low_JJ (_( below_RG .05_MC )_) under_II the_AT correctly_RR specified_VVN model_NN1 across_II all_DB simulation_NN1 conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO enable_VVI comparisons_NN2 to_II results_NN2 of_IO previous_JJ studies_NN2 of_IO mother-infant_JJ affect_NN1 synchrony_NN1 (_( Beebe_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Feldman_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Field_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1990_MC ;_; Kaitz_NP1 ,_, Maytal_NP1 ,_, Devor_NP1 ,_, Bergman_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Mankuta_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ,_, we_PPIS2 averaged_VVD facial_JJ affect_NN1 ratings_NN2 within_II each_DD1 1-s_MC2 interval_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 procedure_NN1 yields_VVZ a_AT1 cumulative_JJ distribution_NN1 function_NN1 of_IO odds_NN2 ratios_NN2 and_CC the_AT MOR_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT median_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 distribution_NN1 (_( Larsen_NP1 &;_NULL Merlo_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ,_, we_PPIS2 observed_VVD a_AT1 monotonic_JJ decline_NN1 in_II memory_NN1 quality_NN1 across_II all_DB responses_NN2 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 aggregate_JJ error_NN1 distributions_NN2 were_VBDR completely_RR uniform_JJ for_IF the_AT fifth_MD and_CC sixth_MD responses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA described_VVN by_II PID_NP1 014_MC ,_, "_" I_PPIS1 don_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 think_VV0 I_ZZ1 '_NULL d_ZZ1 be_VBI very_RG comfortable_JJ having_VHG the_AT phone_NN1 with_IW me_PPIO1 and_CC then_RT having_VHG to_TO answer_VVI questions_NN2 like_II where_RRQ I_ZZ1 '_NULL m_ZZ1 at_II ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, understanding_VVG the_AT psychological_JJ processes_NN2 that_CST contribute_VV0 to_II intergroup_JJ bias_NN1 and_CC conflict_NN1 can_VM guide_VVI interventions_NN2 to_TO improve_VVI intergroup_JJ relations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, not_XX all_DB individuals_NN2 within_II stigmatized_JJ groups_NN2 are_VBR equally_RR vulnerable_JJ or_CC affected_VVN by_II the_AT negative_JJ social_JJ attitudes_NN2 and_CC discrimination_NN1 they_PPHS2 encounter_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cognitive_JJ explanations_NN2 are_VBR directed_VVN at_II explaining_VVG environment-behaviour_JJ relations_NN2 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 mental_JJ mechanisms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specific_JJ instances_NN2 where_RRQ specifications_NN2 come_VV0 from_II other_JJ models_NN2 are_VBR noted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS you_PPY do_VD0 not_XX need_VVI a_AT1 break_NN1 and_CC would_VM like_VVI to_TO continue_VVI working_VVG then_RT you_PPY should_VM just_RR remain_VVI in_II the_AT "_" run_NN1 room_NN1 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 process_NN1 resulted_VVN in_II a_AT1 final_JJ sample_NN1 of_IO 64_MC participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 items_NN2 were_VBDR designed_VVN to_II measure_NN1 the_AT components_NN2 of_IO social_JJ skills_NN2 as_CSA defined_VVN by_II Cillessen_NP1 and_CC Bellmore_NP1 (_( 2011_MC )_) as_CSA being_VBG prosocial_JJ and_CC cooperative_JJ ,_, and_CC being_VBG interpersonally_RR successful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 are_VBR also_RR excited_VVN by_II discussions_NN2 of_IO strategy_NN1 change_NN1 such_II21 as_II22 Billman_NP1 and_CC Shaman_NN1 (_( 1990_MC )_) and_CC the_AT newer_JJR focus_NN1 on_II subtask_NN1 learning_VVG such_II21 as_II22 Anglim_NP1 and_CC Wynton_NP1 (_( 2015_MC )_) and_CC Tenison_NP1 and_CC Anderson_NP1 (_( 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 dimensions_NN2 create_VV0 a_AT1 framework_NN1 of_IO character_NN1 that_CST "_" is_VBZ not_XX age_NN1 or_CC culturally_RR bounded_VVN because_CS its_APPGE contents_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN suggested_VVN throughout_II history_NN1 and_CC across_II cultures_NN2 by_II philosophers_NN2 and_CC theologians_NN2 and_CC in_II a_AT1 wide_JJ variety_NN1 of_IO major_JJ psychological_JJ theories_NN2 "_" (_( Sosik_NP1 &;_NULL Cameron_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC ,_, p._NN1 252_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 indicate_VV0 that_CST consumers_NN2 attribute_VV0 great_JJ importance_NN1 to_II the_AT functional_JJ components_NN2 that_CST they_PPHS2 know_VV0 well_RR and_CC are_VBR confident_JJ about_II their_APPGE impact_NN1 on_II health_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Out-of-school_VV0 behavioral_JJ services_NN2 were_VBDR defined_VVN as_CSA receiving_VVG outpatient_NN1 treatment_NN1 in_II a_AT1 specialty_NN1 mental_JJ health_NN1 setting_NN1 or_CC out-of-school_JJ Behavioral_JJ Health_NN1 Rehabilitation_NN1 Services_NN2 (_( BHRS_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 have_VH0 no_AT solid_JJ explanation_NN1 for_IF this_DD1 effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ possible_JJ that_CST measures_VVZ that_CST assess_VV0 general_JJ fairness_NN1 perceptions_NN2 might_VM also_RR yield_VVI status-legitimacy_JJ effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 combination_NN1 of_IO effects_NN2 indicates_VVZ that_CST it_PPH1 remains_VVZ the_AT case_NN1 that_CST Positive_JJ Relevance_NN1 contents_NN2 are_VBR evaluated_VVN higher_RRR than_CSN Irrelevance_NN1 contents_NN2 ,_, even_RR in_II31 spite_II32 of_II33 the_AT TT/TF_FU manipulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 ,_, as_II a_AT1 whole_NN1 ,_, suggest_VV0 that_CST as_CSA interdependence_NN1 increases_NN2 ,_, various_JJ team_NN1 behaviors_NN2 and_CC emergent_JJ states_NN2 become_VV0 increasingly_RR important_JJ for_IF achieving_VVG high_JJ performance_NN1 amongst_II team_NN1 members_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT juveniles_NN2 were_VBDR either_RR dark_JJ bodied_VVN and_CC pale_JJ headed_JJ ,_, or_CC pale_JJ bodied_VVN and_CC dark_NN1 headed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 2_MC (_( Experiments_VVZ 3_MC &;_NULL 4_MC )_) ×_II 2_MC (_( FA_NP1 vs_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
DA_FU )_) between_II subjects_NN2 analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, Mandarin_NN1 learners_NN2 can_VM not_XX apply_VVI the_AT same_DA grapheme-to-phoneme_JJ scheme_NN1 of_IO alphabetic_JJ systems_NN2 while_CS reading_VVG Chinese_JJ ,_, but_CCB instead_RR access_VV0 the_AT phonological_JJ information_NN1 through_II visuo-orthographic_JJ information_NN1 of_IO the_AT character_NN1 (_( Tan_NN1 ,_, Hoosain_NN1 ,_, &;_NULL Peng_NP1 ,_, 1995_MC ;_; Tan_NN1 ,_, Laird_NP1 ,_, Li_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Fox_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, our_APPGE use_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 penalized_JJ regression_NN1 method_NN1 (_( LASSO_NP1 )_) attempts_VVZ to_TO mitigate_VVI this_DD1 issue_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 suspect_VV0 that_CST the_AT emphasis_NN1 on_II the_AT right_JJ hemisphere_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 role_NN1 in_II spatial_JJ cognition_NN1 in_II the_AT more_RGR recent_JJ literature_NN1 is_VBZ due_II21 to_II22 the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST right-hemisphere_JJ lesions_NN2 produce_VV0 very_RG obvious_JJ and_CC striking_JJ impairments_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 hemispatial_JJ neglect_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ are_VBR related_VVN to_II the_AT spatial_JJ domain_NN1 but_CCB are_VBR also_RR heavily_RR loaded_VVN on_II attention_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS the_AT impairments_NN2 from_II left-hemisphere_JJ lesions_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 constructional_JJ apraxia_NN1 ,_, are_VBR less_RGR evident_JJ in_II everyday_JJ life_NN1 and_CC only_RR revealed_VVN by_II tasks_NN2 that_CST make_VV0 very_RG specific_JJ spatial_JJ demands_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 mental_JJ rotation_NN1 or_CC construction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ common_JJ for_IF research_NN1 in_II organizational_JJ behavior_NN1 and_CC management_NN1 to_TO encounter_VVI problems_NN2 with_IW endogeneity_NN1 due_II21 to_II22 the_AT difficulty_NN1 of_IO randomizing_VVG predictors_NN2 ,_, making_VVG it_PPH1 challenging_VVG for_IF researchers_NN2 to_TO make_VVI causal_JJ claims_NN2 between_II variables_NN2 in_II the_AT study_NN1 (_( Antonakis_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT odds_NN2 ratio_NN1 for_IF age_NN1 is_VBZ 0.98_MC ,_, representing_VVG a_AT1 statistically_RR significant_JJ 2%_NNU decrease_NN1 in_II the_AT odds_NN2 of_IO adjudication_NN1 withheld_VVN for_IF every-one_PN1 year_NNT1 increase_NN1 in_II age_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participation_NN1 was_VBDZ limited_VVN to_II U.S._NP1 residents_NN2 only_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Regarding_II antidepressant_JJ treatment_NN1 response_NN1 ,_, in_II the_AT literature_NN1 ,_, there_EX have_VH0 been_VBN reports_NN2 that_CST BPD_NP1 depression_NN1 has_VHZ a_AT1 lower_JJR response_NN1 than_CSN that_DD1 for_IF MDD_NP1 (_( Park_NP1 and_CC Lee_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; Sharma_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 addition_II32 to_II33 the_AT manipulated_JJ variable_NN1 of_IO practice_NN1 schedule_NN1 ,_, several_DA2 cognitive_JJ and_CC motivational_JJ variables_NN2 and_CC individual_JJ characteristic_JJ variables_NN2 were_VBDR assessed_VVN to_TO examine_VVI whether_CSW they_PPHS2 potentially_RR moderate_VV0 the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO the_AT distributed_JJ practice_NN1 schedule_NN1 on_II learning_VVG performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, participants_NN2 '_NULL mood_NN1 can_VM influence_VVI their_APPGE reactions_NN2 to_II facial_JJ expressions_NN2 (_( Moody_NP1 ,_, McIntosh_NP1 ,_, Mann_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Weisser_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Regression_NN1 analysis_NN1 in_II which_DDQ humanitarian_JJ aid_NN1 was_VBDZ regressed_VVN simultaneously_RR on_II liberal_JJ attitudes_NN2 and_CC IER_NP1 resulted_VVD in_II significant_JJ unique_JJ effects_NN2 for_IF the_AT two_MC predictors_NN2 :_: liberal_JJ attitudes_NN2 (_( β_NULL =_FO .48_MC ,_, t_ZZ1 =_FO 9.31_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .01_MC )_) and_CC IER_NP1 (_( β_NULL =_FO .16_MC ,_, t_ZZ1 =_FO 2.32_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .05_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Experiments_NN2 1_MC1 ,_, 2_MC ,_, and_CC 3_MC the_AT same_DA materials_NN2 were_VBDR used_VVN :_: an_AT1 audio_JJ recording_NN1 as_II the_AT original_JJ material_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 written_JJ description_NN1 of_IO this_DD1 recording_NN1 with_IW and_CC without_IW misinformation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 held_VVD for_IF negative_JJ self-enhancing_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, anger_VV0 ,_, contempt_NN1 )_) ,_, opening_VVG (_( e.g._REX ,_, interest_NN1 ,_, excitement_NN1 )_) ,_, and_CC conserving_VVG (_( e.g._REX ,_, calmness_NN1 ,_, relief_NN1 )_) emotions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ consistent_JJ with_IW previous_JJ studies_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 demonstrated_VVN that_CST the_AT recollective_JJ quality_NN1 of_IO memories_NN2 are_VBR better_JJR predictors_NN2 of_IO HC_NP1 involvement_NN1 than_CSN memory_NN1 recency_NN1 per_RR21 se_RR22 (_( Addis_NP1 ,_, Moscovitch_NP1 ,_, et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC ;_; Bonnici_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Sheldon_NP1 &;_NULL Levine_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT ranger_NN1 saw_VVD the_AT eagle_NN1 in_II the_AT sky_NN1 in_II a_AT1 decontextualized_JJ ,_, 2_MC experimental_JJ setting_NN1 entails_VVZ taking_VVG hold_NN1 of_IO the_AT t_ZZ1 y_ZZ1 p_ZZ1 e_ZZ1 of_IO situation_NN1 this_DD1 sentence_NN1 may_VM refer_VVI to_II ._. 
</s>
<s>
Timefrequency_NN1 analyses_NN2 help_VV0 quantify_VVI non-phase-locked_JJ activity_NN1 by_II decomposing_VVG the_AT epochs_NN2 into_II multiple_JJ frequencies_NN2 and_CC extracting_VVG the_AT power_NN1 at_II each_DD1 frequency_NN1 over_II time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Simpler_JJR methods_NN2 also_RR increase_VV0 the_AT feasibility_NN1 of_IO interventions_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ benefits_NN2 dissemination_NN1 and_CC replication_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 of_IO the_AT strongest_JJT findings_NN2 indicating_VVG that_CST ,_, indeed_RR ,_, this_DD1 effect_NN1 was_VBDZ due_II21 to_II22 reduced_JJ reliance_NN1 on_II noncompensatory_JJ gist_NN1 mem-ories_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST the_AT effect_NN1 was_VBDZ never_RR observed_VVN with_IW distractors_NN2 ,_, for_IF which_DDQ such_DA memories_NN2 were_VBDR presumably_RR not_XX available_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Historically_RR ,_, relations_NN2 between_II SES_NP2 and_CC infant_NN1 novelty_NN1 preference_NN1 were_VBDR inconsistent_JJ (_( Fagan_NP1 &;_NULL Singer_NP1 ,_, 1983_MC ;_; O_UH '_NULL Connor_NP1 ,_, Cohen_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Parmelee_NP1 ,_, 1984_MC ;_; Rose_NP1 &;_NULL Wallace_NP1 ,_, 1985_MC )_) ,_, and_CC a_AT1 recent_JJ meta-analysis_NN1 reported_VVD no_AT evidence_NN1 of_IO SES_NP2 differences_NN2 in_II infant_NN1 operant_NN1 conditioning_NN1 (_( Gerhardstein_NP1 ,_, Dickerson_NP1 ,_, Miller_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Hipp_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Future_JJ studies_NN2 are_VBR needed_VVN to_TO determine_VVI if_CSW such_DA use_NN1 would_VM increase_VVI cessation_NN1 rates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II summary_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 first_MD mediation_NN1 analyses_NN2 showed_VVD that_DD1 scene_NN1 construction_NN1 could_VM explain_VVI the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II autobiographical_JJ memory_NN1 and_CC future_JJ thinking_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT dick_NN1 pic_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN examined_VVN empirically_RR as_II an_AT1 offshoot_NN1 of_IO broader_JJR academic_JJ discussions_NN2 regarding_II other_JJ digitally-mediated_JJ sexual_JJ behaviors_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 sexting_VVG –_- the_AT sending_NN1 of_IO sexually_RR suggestive_JJ messages_NN2 ,_, using_VVG either_RR sexually_RR explicit_JJ language_NN1 or_CC photos/videos_NN2 (_( Delevi_NP1 &;_NULL Weisskirch_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) –_- and_CC the_AT sending_NN1 of_IO nude_JJ images_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Albury_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Dobson_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; March_NP1 &;_NULL Wagstaff_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT bias-corrected_JJ data_NN for_IF both_DB2 response_NN1 formats_NN2 were_VBDR generated_VVN by_II the_AT two-high-threshold_NN1 (_( 2HT_FO )_) method_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 3_MC shows_VVZ the_AT unique_JJ predictive_JJ power_NN1 of_IO self_NN1 and_CC otherrated_VVD Agreeableness_NP1 at_II both_DB2 ages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 participant_NN1 then_RT completed_VVD two_MC study-test_JJ blocks_NN2 ,_, with_IW the_AT procedure_NN1 identical_JJ for_IF each_DD1 block_NN1 of_IO the_AT experiment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS this_DD1 evidence_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX conclusive_JJ ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ nevertheless_RR suggestive_JJ of_IO the_AT coexistence_NN1 of_IO the_AT incentive_NN1 mechanism_NN1 and_CC the_AT stereotype_NN1 threat_NN1 effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT CES_NP2 (_( Moos_NP1 &;_NULL Trickett_NP1 ,_, 1974_MC )_) is_VBZ a_AT1 90-item_NN1 ,_, true-false_JJ questionnaire_NN1 measuring_VVG four_MC dimensions_NN2 and_CC nine_MC sub-dimensions_NN2 of_IO classroom_NN1 climate_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Vroomen_NN2 ,_, Bertelson_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL de_NP1 Gelder_NP1 ,_, 2001b_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX have_VH0 been_VBN several_DA2 attempts_NN2 to_TO assess_VVI interactive_JJ or_CC synergistic_JJ effects_NN2 between_II variables_NN2 from_II major_JJ criminological_JJ theories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Constrained_VVN and_CC unconstrained_JJ represented_VVD the_AT two_MC estimation_NN1 procedures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 parent-offspring_JJ associations_NN2 were_VBDR found_VVN irrespective_II21 of_II22 whether_CSW the_AT parent_NN1 was_VBDZ diagnosed_VVN with_IW dyslexia_NN1 or_CC was_VBDZ unaffected_JJ ,_, suggesting_VVG again_RT parental_JJ effects_NN2 on_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reading_VVG performance_NN1 (_( van_NP1 Bergen_NP1 ,_, de_NP1 Jong_NP1 ,_, Maassen_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL van_NP1 der_NP1 Leij_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
See_VV0 Table_NN1 A1_FO in_II Appendix_NN1 A_ZZ1 for_IF a_AT1 full_JJ nonword_NN1 list_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Half_DB of_IO the_AT stimuli_NN2 within_II each_DD1 category_NN1 presented_VVD social_JJ content_NN1 (_( faces_VVZ ,_, people_NN )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Choi_NN2 and_CC colleagues_NN2 did_VDD not_XX explicitly_RR study_VVI changes_NN2 in_II attention_NN1 and_CC motor_NN1 network_NN1 interhemispheric_JJ and_CC intrahemispheric_JJ internetwork_NN1 connectivity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Analysis_NN1 of_IO Cg3_FO and_CC AID_NN1 neurons_NN2 showed_VVD an_AT1 increase_NN1 in_II dendritic_JJ branching_JJ and_CC spine_NN1 density_NN1 in_II both_DB2 regions_NN2 (_( see_VV0 Table_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II these_DD2 cases_NN2 ,_, as_RG well_RR as_CSA in_II a_AT1 case_NN1 of_IO infarct_NN1 caused_VVN by_II occlusion_NN1 of_IO the_AT recurrent_JJ artery_NN1 of_IO Heubner_NP1 (_( Kumral_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1999_MC )_) ,_, the_AT authors_NN2 postulated_VVD that_CST the_AT language_NN1 disturbances_NN2 could_VM be_VBI explained_VVN by_II disconnection_NN1 between_II the_AT caudate_NN1 nucleus_NN1 and_CC the_AT frontal_JJ cortex_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_CS21 that_CS22 other_JJ studies_NN2 finding_VVG a_AT1 significant_JJ association_NN1 have_VH0 used_VVN quantitative_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO HBI_NP1 ,_, this_DD1 may_VM not_XX be_VBI the_AT only_JJ factor_NN1 explaining_VVG our_APPGE results_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, client-rated_JJ MCCs_NP2 were_VBDR positively_RR associated_VVN with_IW satisfaction_NN1 with_IW counseling_NN1 and_CC with_IW therapy_NN1 outcomes_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Constantine_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC ;_; Fuertes_NP1 &;_NULL Brobst_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC ;_; Owen_NP1 ,_, Leach_NP1 ,_, Wampold_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Rodolfa_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ,_, as_RG well_RR as_CSA with_IW clients_NN2 '_NULL ratings_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE therapists_NN2 '_NULL general_JJ competence_NN1 ,_, empathy_NN1 ,_, and_CC credibility_NN1 (_( Fuertes_NP1 &;_NULL Brobst_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC ;_; Fuertes_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2006_MC ;_; Kim_NP1 ,_, Li_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Liang_NP1 ,_, 2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II this_DD1 assessment_NN1 ,_, children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 expressive_JJ language_NN1 age_NN1 and_CC receptive_JJ language_NN1 age_NN1 were_VBDR derived_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 do_VD0 not_XX find_VVI any_DD evidence_NN1 that_CST previous_JJ changes_NN2 in_II initiating_VVG structure_NN1 are_VBR related_VVN to_II subsequent_JJ changes_NN2 in_II leader_NN1 identity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 means_VVZ that_CST divergences_NN2 in_II these_DD2 two_MC causes_NN2 of_IO death_NN1 account_NN1 for_IF increasing_JJ inequality_NN1 in_II age_NN1 at_II death_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS this_DD1 is_VBZ high_JJ ,_, especially_RR for_IF the_AT regions_NN2 of_IO the_AT brain_NN1 on_II which_DDQ complex_JJ thought_NN1 and_CC behaviour_NN1 depend_VV0 ,_, the_AT association_NN1 will_VM rarely_RR be_VBI strong_JJ except_CS in_II cases_NN2 where_RRQ the_AT pathology_NN1 is_VBZ gross_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Reliability_NN1 for_IF the_AT reading_NN1 comprehension_NN1 task_NN1 was_VBDZ adequate_JJ at_II =_FO .71_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT development_NN1 of_IO the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO '_NULL expressiveness_NN1 '_NULL is_VBZ intended_VVN as_II a_AT1 key_JJ step_NN1 towards_II the_AT broader_JJR understanding_NN1 of_IO prosodic_JJ components_NN2 of_IO music_NN1 and_CC speech_NN1 cognition_NN1 ,_, underscoring_VVG the_AT rich_JJ phenomenological_JJ experience_NN1 of_IO appreciation_NN1 of_IO the_AT sound_NN1 stream_NN1 (_( Loutrari_NP1 and_CC Lorch_NP1 ,_, in_II press_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II keeping_VVG up_RP with_IW the_AT surgency_NN1 of_IO remote_JJ services_NN2 ,_, various_JJ medical_JJ and_CC mental_JJ health_NN1 organizations_NN2 ,_, including_II the_AT American_JJ Psychological_JJ Association_NN1 (_( 2013_MC )_) ,_, the_AT American_JJ Telemedicine_NN1 Association_NN1 (_( 2013_MC )_) ,_, and_CC the_AT American_JJ Psychiatric_JJ Association_NN1 (_( 2018_MC )_) have_VH0 also_RR established_VVN guidelines_NN2 for_IF the_AT ethical_JJ and_CC secure_JJ practice_NN1 of_IO mental_JJ health_NN1 delivered_VVD over_RP a_AT1 distance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II the_AT 12th_MD week_NNT1 ,_, however_RR ,_, no_AT significant_JJ differences_NN2 were_VBDR found_VVN between_II treatment_NN1 groups_NN2 on_II any_DD of_IO the_AT 19_MC HAQ-II_MC items_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Alcohol_NN1 use_NN1 disorders_NN2 were_VBDR slightly_RR more_RGR common_JJ among_II attempters_NN2 compared_VVN to_II ideators_NN2 (_( d_ZZ1 =_FO .31_MC )_) and_CC among_II ideators_NN2 compared_VVN to_II nonsuicidal_JJ individuals_NN2 (_( d_ZZ1 =_FO .36_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ study_NN1 investigated_VVD connections_NN2 between_II spiritual_JJ maturity_NN1 ,_, mature_JJ alterity_NN1 ,_, spiritual_JJ service_NN1 ,_, and_CC spiritual_JJ leadership_NN1 in_II a_AT1 predominantly_RR female_JJ and_CC ethnically_RR diverse_JJ sample_NN1 of_IO Christian_JJ ministry_NN1 leaders_NN2 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 115_MC )_) in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT plural_JJ head_NN1 nouns_NN2 alone_RR ,_, the_AT controls_NN2 produced_VVD very_RG few_DA2 agreement_NN1 errors_NN2 (_( 0.2%_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG Institutional_JJ Review_NN1 Board_NN1 approval_NN1 ,_, NCAA_NP1 Division_NN1 I_ZZ1 institutions_NN2 in_II the_AT Midwest_NP1 region_NN1 of_IO the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 were_VBDR contacted_VVN to_TO obtain_VVI site_NN1 permission_NN1 for_IF soliciting_VVG student-athlete_JJ participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 furthermore_RR collect_VV0 a_AT1 range_NN1 of_IO demographic_JJ information_NN1 ,_, including_II gender_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ may_VM play_VVI a_AT1 part_NN1 in_II determining_JJ honesty_NN1 behavior_NN1 (_( Abeler_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Sympathy_NN1 ,_, b=.35_FO ,_, t_ZZ1 (_( 314_MC )_) =7.82_FO ,_, p<.001_FO ,_, and_CC acceptance_NN1 of_IO rape_NN1 myths_NN2 ,_, b_ZZ1 =_FO -.17_MC ,_, t(314)_FO =_FO -2.56_MC ,_, p=.011_FO ,_, significantly_RR predicted_VVD the_AT levels_NN2 of_IO attributed_JJ perpetrator_NN1 blame_NN1 in_II the_AT final_JJ model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Findings_NN2 should_VM be_VBI cautiously_RR generalized_VVN to_II other_JJ hospitality_NN1 ,_, tourism_NN1 ,_, or_CC service_NN1 contexts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 tendency_NN1 can_VM also_RR be_VBI observed_VVN in_II Fig._NN1 6_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 line_II32 with_II33 our_APPGE procedure_NN1 in_II Section_NN1 4.4_MC ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR ran_VVD multi-level_JJ mixed-effects_NN2 logistic_JJ regressions_NN2 with_IW receivers_NN2 '_NULL trust_VV0 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 their_APPGE acceptance_NN1 of_IO the_AT sender_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 message_NN1 as_II the_AT dependent_JJ variable_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Having_VHG any_DD PLEs_NN2 referred_VVN to_II endorsing_VVG at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 of_IO the_AT four_MC above-mentioned_JJ psychotic_JJ symptoms_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
LP_NN1 voice_NN1 and_CC silence_NN1 research_NN1 offers_NN2 added_VVD explanatory_JJ utility_NN1 in_II these_DD2 areas_NN2 ,_, considered_VVN in_II the_AT next_MD section_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
During_II this_DD1 time-window_NN1 ,_, reading_VVG German_JJ words_NN2 was_VBDZ associated_VVN to_II higher_JJR response_NN1 strength_NN1 than_CSN reading_VVG French_JJ words_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Research_NN1 on_II situational_JJ interest_NN1 has_VHZ shown_VVN how_RGQ similar_JJ situations_NN2 can_VM spark_VVI different_JJ interests_NN2 in_II different_JJ people_NN (_( Silvia_NP1 2006_MC )_) ,_, indicating_VVG how_RRQ interest_NN1 is_VBZ essentially_RR a_AT1 subjective_JJ and_CC selective_JJ experience_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_RG Best_RRT et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2015_MC )_) note_VV0 ,_, the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST the_AT model_NN1 failed_VVD to_TO predict_VVI the_AT results_NN2 of_IO intervention_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 particular_JJ impairment_NN1 type_NN1 means_VVZ that_CST the_AT model_NN1 can_VM not_XX be_VBI correct_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Utterances_NN2 were_VBDR not_XX excluded_VVN if_CS the_AT complementizer_NN1 region_NN1 was_VBDZ absent_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Agents_NN2 most_RGT often_RR represent_VV0 people_NN ,_, but_CCB they_PPHS2 can_VM represent_VVI any_DD decision-making_JJ entity_NN1 in_II the_AT model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT broad_JJ theoretical_JJ framework_NN1 outlined_VVN in_II Eqs._NP1 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC ,_, allows_VVZ for_IF the_AT simulation_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 plenitude_NN1 of_IO diffusion_NN1 models_NN2 with_IW one_MC1 and_CC the_AT same_DA software_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Performance_NN1 data_NN were_VBDR analyzed_VVN in_II StataSE_NP1 13.0_MC (_( StataCorp_NP1 LP_NN1 ,_, College_NN1 Station_NN1 ,_, TX_NP1 )_) using_VVG mixed-effects_NN2 models_NN2 including_II a_AT1 within-subjects_NN2 factor_NN1 condition_NN1 (_( Evening/Morning_NNT1 )_) and_CC a_AT1 between-subjects_NN2 factor_NN1 group_NN1 (_( ADHD/TDC_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bernie_NP1 Madoff_NP1 was_VBDZ selected_VVN because_CS he_PPHS1 is_VBZ a_AT1 convicted_JJ criminal_NN1 and_CC therefore_RR a_AT1 negative_JJ figure_NN1 associated_VVN with_IW immoral_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Definitions_NN2 for_IF each_DD1 of_IO the_AT GRADE_NN1 quality_NN1 level_NN1 ratings_NN2 are_VBR shown_VVN in_II Table_NN1 2_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST comprehenders_NN2 are_VBR aware_JJ of_IO the_AT probability_NN1 of_IO different_JJ coherence_NN1 relations_NN2 ,_, updating_VVG their_APPGE expectations_NN2 about_II the_AT operative_JJ coherence_NN1 relation_NN1 when_CS they_PPHS2 encounter_VV0 a_AT1 connective_NN1 that_CST signals_VVZ that_CST an_AT1 unexpected_JJ relation_NN1 holds_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB the_AT long-term_JJ effectiveness_NN1 of_IO such_DA a_AT1 response_NN1 is_VBZ rather_RG questionable_JJ (_( Staw_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1981_MC )_) ,_, and_CC such_DA behavior_NN1 might_VM turn_VVI out_RP to_TO be_VBI rather_RG detrimental_JJ to_II performance_NN1 or_CC innovation_NN1 (_( Somech_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 three_MC cases_NN2 involved_VVD three_MC therapists_NN2 (_( all_DB female_JJ )_) with_IW diverse_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO education_NN1 (_( from_II advanced_JJ doctoral_JJ students_NN2 to_II Ph.D_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
level_JJ clinical_JJ psychologists_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Half_DB of_IO the_AT participants_NN2 performed_VVD the_AT task_NN1 under_II FA_NP1 conditions_NN2 ,_, and_CC half_DB under_II DA_NN1 conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Data_NN were_VBDR coded_VVN in_II the_AT original_JJ language_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO summarize_VVI functional_JJ data_NN ,_, we_PPIS2 performed_VVD a_AT1 functional_JJ PCA_NN1 on_II the_AT data_NN functions_NN2 of_IO force_NN1 under_II left_JJ foot_NN1 and_CC obtained_VVD component_JJ scores_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ were_VBDR used_VVN as_CSA indicator_NN1 variables_NN2 for_IF force_NN1 under_II left_JJ foot_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Overall_RR random_JJ elects_NN2 based_VVN on_II 94_MC tests_NN2 showed_VVD a_AT1 small_JJ but_CCB significant_JJ QBE_NN1 (_( g_ZZ1 =_FO 0.14_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO =_FO 0.11_MC ,_, 0.18_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR while_CS ,_, in_II the_AT outgroup_NN1 ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ no_AT difference_NN1 in_II the_AT endorsement_NN1 of_IO powerless_JJ emotions_NN2 to_II high_JJ or_CC low_JJ status_NN1 individuals_NN2 ,_, powerless_JJ emotions_NN2 were_VBDR more_RGR strongly_RR endorsed_VVN when_CS interacting_VVG with_IW low_JJ status_NN1 compared_VVN to_II high_JJ status_NN1 individuals_NN2 in_II the_AT ingroup_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT complexity_NN1 of_IO the_AT Chinese_JJ writing_NN1 system_NN1 ,_, children_NN2 need_VV0 a_AT1 considerable_JJ amount_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 and_CC effort_NN1 to_TO attain_VVI automaticity_NN1 in_II Chinese_JJ transcription_NN1 skills_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA quadratic_JJ curvilinear_JJ trajectories_NN2 can_VM be_VBI difficult_JJ to_TO interpret_VVI and_CC compare_VVI across_II multiple_JJ trajectories_NN2 ,_, piecewise_RR latent_JJ growth_NN1 analysis_NN1 (_( Muthén_NP1 and_CC Muthén_NP1 1998_MC ,_, 1999_MC ,_, 2000_MC ,_, 2001_MC ,_, 2002_MC ,_, 2003_MC ,_, 2004_MC ,_, 2005_MC ,_, 2006_MC ,_, 2007_MC ,_, 2008_MC ,_, 2009_MC ,_, 2010_MC ,_, 2011_MC ,_, 2012_MC )_) was_VBDZ used_VVN to_TO examine_VVI adolescent_JJ and_CC best_JJT friend_NN1 delinquency_NN1 development_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 result_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 added_VVD two_MC questions_NN2 on_II ACO_NP1 partnerships_NN2 in_II waves_NN2 2-3_MCMC and_CC the_AT wave_NN1 1_MC1 follow_NN121 up_NN122 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 ambiguous_JJ evidence_NN1 regarding_II the_AT role_NN1 of_IO uncertainty_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, Messinger_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2008_MC )_) used_VVD still_RR face_VV0 images_NN2 of_IO unfamiliar_JJ five_MC to_II six-month-old_JJ infants_NN2 '_NULL smiles_VVZ to_TO look_VVI for_IF variation_NN1 in_II observers_NN2 '_NULL perceived_VVD positive_JJ emotions_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, joy_NN1 ,_, happiness_NN1 ,_, positive_JJ feeling_NN1 )_) between_II U.S._NP1 parents_NN2 and_CC non-parents_NN2 (_( all_DB college_NN1 students_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT interaction_NN1 between_II name_NN1 membership_NN1 and_CC age_NN1 was_VBDZ statistically_RR significant_JJ in_II the_AT analysis_NN1 involving_VVG the_AT first_MD letter_NN1 of_IO the_AT name_NN1 and_CC the_AT analysis_NN1 involving_VVG the_AT second_MD letter_NN1 of_IO the_AT name_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 past_JJ evidence_NN1 (_( Fernald_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Halle_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Hoff_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Rowe_NP1 &;_NULL Goldin-Meadow_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, disparities_NN2 in_II receptive_JJ language_NN1 were_VBDR detectable_JJ by_II 15_MC months_NNT2 ,_, and_CC disparities_NN2 in_II expressive_JJ language_NN1 were_VBDR detectable_JJ by_II 21_MC months_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II this_DD1 perspective_NN1 ,_, teaching_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 generally_RR useful_JJ mechanism_NN1 to_TO make_VVI difficult_JJ learning_NN1 easier_RRR ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS children_NN2 of_IO all_DB ages_NN2 asked_VVD approximately_RR the_AT same_DA number_NN1 of_IO questions_NN2 ,_, indicating_VVG seemingly_RR equal_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO curiosity_NN1 ,_, the_AT nature_NN1 of_IO those_DD2 questions_NN2 changed_VVN with_IW age_NN1 :_: younger_JJR children_NN2 typically_RR asked_VVD questions_NN2 about_II Santa_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ordinary_JJ ,_, human-like_JJ properties_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, "_" Where_RRQ does_VDZ Santa_NP1 live_VVI ?_? "_" )_) ,_, whereas_CS older_JJR children_NN2 typically_RR asked_VVD questions_NN2 about_II Santa_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 extraordinary_JJ ,_, nonhuman-like_JJ properties_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, "_" How_RRQ can_VM Santa_NP1 Claus_NP1 get_VV0 around_RP to_II all_DB the_AT houses_NN2 in_II one_MC1 night_NNT1 ?_? "_" )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT right_JJ side_NN1 ,_, the_AT relationship_NN1 between_II wellbeing_NN1 and_CC academic_JJ indicators_NN2 could_VM be_VBI be_VBI viewed_VVN as_II the_AT individual_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 response_NN1 back_RP to_II the_AT school_NN1 environment_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, engagement_NN1 in_II school_NN1 work_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS we_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX find_VVI any_DD lasting_JJ effects_NN2 on_II narrative_JJ structure_NN1 scores_NN2 ,_, or_CC any_DD benefit_NN1 of_IO gestural_JJ training_NN1 on_II recall_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 very_RG brief_JJ one-time_JJ intervention_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, as_CSA self-control_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO be_VBI more_RGR malleable_JJ for_IF females_NN2 than_CSN for_IF males_NN2 (_( Piquero_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2010_MC )_) ,_, perhaps_RR especially_RR in_II classes_NN2 with_IW more_DAR females_NN2 training_NN1 self-control_NN1 could_VM be_VBI a_AT1 way_NN1 to_TO prevent_VVI externalizing_VVG behaviors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
After_II controlling_VVG for_IF mental_JJ age_NN1 ,_, results_NN2 revealed_VVD that_CST observational_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO dyadic_JJ sensory_JJ orienting_NN1 and_CC parent_NN1 report_NN1 of_IO sensory_JJ responsiveness_NN1 were_VBDR related_VVN to_II subscales_NN2 of_IO social_JJ competence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Nevertheless_RR ,_, the_AT positive_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO book_NN1 exposure_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ have_VH0 been_VBN replicated_VVN across_II several_DA2 countries_NN2 (_( now_RT including_II Chile_NP1 )_) ,_, should_VM not_XX be_VBI dismissed_VVN as_II a_AT1 potential_JJ policy_NN1 cornerstone_NN1 for_IF improving_JJ reading_NN1 outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 series_NN of_IO regression_NN1 analyses_NN2 were_VBDR used_VVN to_TO obtain_VVI R2_FO values_NN2 from_II each_DD1 of_IO the_AT predictors_NN2 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO partition_VVI the_AT variance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA perceptions_NN2 would_VM both_RR validate_VVI union_NN1 legitimacy_NN1 as_CSA well_RR as_RG strengthen_VV0 perceptions_NN2 of_IO group_NN1 efficacy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA an_AT1 experiment_NN1 could_VM investigate_VVI potential_JJ interactions_NN2 between_II age_NN1 and_CC ND_NP1 ,_, given_CS21 that_CS22 prior_JJ work_NN1 has_VHZ shown_VVN ND_NP1 differently_RR influences_VVZ children_NN2 and_CC adults_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 relationship_NN1 characterized_VVN by_II inspiration_NN1 generally_RR is_VBZ one_PN1 in_II which_DDQ the_AT inspired_JJ makes_VVZ free_JJ use_NN1 of_IO that_DD1 which_DDQ serves_VVZ as_II the_AT inspiration_NN1 ,_, taking_VVG some_DD features_NN2 and_CC leaving_VVG others_NN2 ,_, depending_II21 on_II22 what_DDQ seems_VVZ useful_JJ ,_, relevant_JJ ,_, or_CC interesting_JJ at_II the_AT time_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT main_JJ study_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 will_VM test_VVI whether_CSW the_AT same_DA pattern_NN1 emerges_VVZ when_RRQ we_PPIS2 measure_VV0 self-efficacy_JJ beliefs_NN2 directly_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Biometric_JJ growth_NN1 curve_NN1 analysis_NN1 was_VBDZ conducted_VVN to_TO examine_VVI how_RGQ genetic_JJ and_CC environmental_JJ factors_NN2 drove_VVD the_AT change_NN1 of_IO psychopathic_JJ traits_NN2 across_II waves_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, RSA_NP1 reactivity_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 state_NN1 response_NN1 to_TO stress_VVI or_CC social_JJ interaction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 research_NN1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN by_II the_AT National_JJ Science_NN1 Foundation_NN1 Grant_NP1 BCS-1221723_MC (_( LP_NN1 )_) ,_, the_AT National_JJ Science_NN1 Foundation_NN1 Grant_NP1 BCS-1823913_MC (_( SK_NP1 )_) and_CC grant_VV0 G1001_FO from_II the_AT NYUAD_NN1 Institute_NN1 ,_, New_NP1 York_NP1 University_NN1 Abu_NP1 Dhabi_NP1 (_( LP_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT resource_NN1 model_NN1 of_IO self-control_NN1 posits_VVZ that_DD1 self-control_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 limited_JJ resource_NN1 and_CC failures_NN2 of_IO self-control_NN1 are_VBR most_RGT likely_JJ when_CS resources_NN2 are_VBR depleted_VVN (_( Muraven_NP1 &;_NULL Baumeister_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Temporal_JJ differences_NN2 of_IO neurodevelopmental_JJ milestones_NN2 '_NULL achievement_NN1 are_VBR commonly_RR taken_VVN into_II account_NN1 in_II PT_NN1 infant_NN1 assessment_NN1 during_II the_AT first_MD year_NNT1 of_IO life_NN1 ,_, especially_RR when_CS minor_JJ or_CC none_PN neurological_JJ signs_NN2 arise_VV0 from_II clinical_JJ examination_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST responding_VVG on_II the_AT critical_JJ test_NN1 items_NN2 does_VDZ not_XX differentiate_VVI between_II overall_JJ similarity_NN1 and_CC non-criterial_JJ attribute_NN1 responding_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Differences_NN2 between_II these_DD2 two_MC analyses_NN2 would_VM help_VVI to_TO tease_VVI apart_RL the_AT directionality_NN1 of_IO mother-child_JJ entrainment_NN1 (_( i.e._REX whether_CSW mothers_NN2 adjust_VV0 more_RRR to_II infants_NN2 or_CC vice_RR21 versa_RR22 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX obvious_JJ that_CST psychopathology_NN1 is_VBZ all-or-none_PN or_CC even_RR discontinuous_JJ in_II severity_NN1 ,_, or_CC that_CST the_AT stipulated_JJ cut_NN1 points_NN2 of_IO traditional_JJ diagnostic_JJ schemes_NN2 delineate_VV0 natural_JJ kinds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, 304_MC univariate_NN1 regressions_NN2 are_VBR estimated_VVN -_- for_IF each_DD1 of_IO the_AT two_MC behaviors_NN2 (_( trust_NN1 and_CC reciprocity_NN1 )_) -_- one_PN1 for_IF each_DD1 subject_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Using_VVG what_DDQ he_PPHS1 called_VVD the_AT method_NN1 of_IO repeated_JJ reproduction_NN1 ,_, Bartlett_NP1 showed_VVD that_CST repeated_VVD recollections_NN2 of_IO the_AT story_NN1 typically_RR led_VVN to_II a_AT1 shortened_JJ ,_, more_RGR stereotyped_JJ version_NN1 of_IO it_PPH1 ,_, with_IW details_NN2 either_RR discarded_VVN ,_, transformed_VVD ,_, or_CC added_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, protest_VV0 by_II German_JJ students_NN2 was_VBDZ weakened_VVN by_II punishing_VVG three_MC leaders_NN2 of_IO the_AT protest_NN1 movement_NN1 against_II tuition_NN1 fees_NN2 for_IF participating_VVG in_II the_AT blockage_NN1 of_IO highways_NN2 (_( Schmiedekampf_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Level_NN1 2_MC model_NN1 implies_VVZ that_CST the_AT organization_NN1 j_ZZ1 specific_JJ intercept_VV0 in_II country_NN1 k_ZZ1 (_( b0j_FO |_NULL k_ZZ1 )_) depends_VVZ on_II the_AT intercept_VV0 specific_JJ to_II country_NN1 k_ZZ1 (_( b0k_FO )_) ,_, an_AT1 organization_NN1 specific_JJ covariate_NN1 that_CST codes_NN2 whether_CSW the_AT industry_NN1 the_AT organization_NN1 belongs_VVZ to_TO is_VBZ either_RR the_AT Manufacturing_NN1 Sector_NN1 or_CC the_AT Financial_JJ Sector_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 random_JJ effect_NN1 associated_VVN with_IW that_DD1 organization_NN1 (_( u0j_FO |_NULL k_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Especially_RR the_AT first_MD prerequisite_NN1 is_VBZ critical_JJ because_CS it_PPH1 assumes_VVZ that_CST items_NN2 are_VBR unidimensional_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Regarding_II controls_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 expect_VV0 negative_JJ correlations_NN2 and_CC memory_NN1 predictors_NN2 in_II the_AT MBN_NP1 and_CC negative_JJ correlations_NN2 with_IW lexical-semantic_JJ tasks_NN2 in_II the_AT PBN_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB 16_MC participants_NN2 met_VVD the_AT inclusion_NN1 criterion_NN1 of_IO having_VHG more_DAR than_CSN 90%_NNU successful_JJ trials_NN2 within_II each_DD1 experimental_JJ condition_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 were_VBDR asked_VVN in_II each_DD1 round_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT distribution_NN1 of_IO errors_NN2 appeared_VVD similar_JJ to_II the_AT typical_JJ lag-CRP_JJ function_NN1 for_IF transitions_NN2 in_II free_JJ recall_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 focused_VVD on_II the_AT temporal_JJ dynamics_NN of_IO this_DD1 modulation_NN1 by_II measuring_VVG ERPs_NN2 of_IO participants_NN2 with_IW high_JJ versus_II low_JJ mathematical_JJ expertise_NN1 performing_VVG a_AT1 lexical_JJ decision_NN1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, a_AT1 fixed_JJ value_NN1 of_IO the_AT precision_NN1 hyperparameter_NN1 in_II the_AT prior_JJ for_IF a_AT1 or_CC b_ZZ1 (_( 10-2_MCMC ,_, 10-1_MCMC ,_, 100_MC ,_, 101_MC ,_, 102_MC )_) is_VBZ a_AT1 different_JJ fraction_NN1 (_( percentage_NN1 )_) of_IO the_AT true_JJ precision_NN1 of_IO the_AT coefficient_NN1 at_II different_JJ values_NN2 of_IO effect_NN1 size_NN1 and_CC sample_NN1 size_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, the_AT bulk_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 studies_NN2 address_VV0 the_AT individuallevel_NN1 processing_NN1 of_IO social_JJ stimulus_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, studies_NN2 on_II implicit_JJ attitudes_NN2 )_) ,_, leaving_VVG the_AT social_JJ as_CSA simply_RR the_AT context_NN1 or_CC terrain_NN1 where_CS inherent_JJ fixed_JJ tendencies_NN2 are_VBR played_VVN out_RP (_( Reicher_NP1 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ,_, whereas_CS less_DAR space_NN1 is_VBZ devoted_JJ to_II a_AT1 social_JJ psychology_NN1 assuming_VVG that_CST the_AT social_JJ and_CC the_AT individual_NN1 are_VBR interwoven_VVN (_( Moscovici_NP1 ,_, 1988_MC ;_; Vala_NP1 &;_NULL Castro_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 trend_NN1 seems_VVZ to_TO confirm_VVI some_DD theoretical_JJ assumptions_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Arendt_NP1 ,_, 1958_MC ;_; Marx_NP1 ,_, 1844_MC )_) that_CST fulfilling_JJ work_NN1 may_VM positively_RR contribute_VVI to_II a_AT1 representation_NN1 of_IO the_AT worker_NN1 as_CSA fully_RR human_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 possibility_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST after_CS the_AT cued_VVN item_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN selected_VVN ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ stored_VVN in_II a_AT1 state_NN1 that_CST can_VM better_RRR drive_VVI behavioral_JJ output_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Predicting_VVG the_AT most-likely_JJ heuristic_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 degree_NN1 of_IO risk_NN1 aversion_NN1 is_VBZ less_RGR straightforward_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 also_RR means_VVZ that_CST the_AT number_NN1 of_IO test_NN1 runs_VVZ that_CST can_VM be_VBI conducted_VVN with_IW a_AT1 single_JJ individual_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX restricted_VVN ,_, making_VVG fNIRS_NN2 ideal_JJ for_IF longitudinal_JJ studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ study_NN1 addressed_VVD perseverative_JJ limb_NN1 selection_NN1 in_II young_JJ children_NN2 in_II the_AT age_NN1 of_IO 14_MC ,_, 24_MC and_CC 36_MC months_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS the_AT full_JJ array_NN1 of_IO interpersonal_JJ empathy_NN1 and_CC social_JJ empathy_NN1 is_VBZ available_JJ in_II helping_VVG relationships_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 are_VBR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO respond_VVI in_II appropriate_JJ ,_, caring_VVG ways_NN2 to_II the_AT other_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Statistical_JJ analyses_NN2 were_VBDR based_VVN on_II the_AT specific_JJ aims_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT pattern_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR dramatic_JJ when_CS 1=11=1_FO ._. 
</s>
<s>
Descriptive_JJ analysis_NN1 was_VBDZ first_MD conducted_VVN to_TO identify_VVI the_AT sample_NN1 characteristics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 seems_VVZ equally_RR important_JJ to_TO understand_VVI intergroup_JJ relations_NN2 that_CST are_VBR characterized_VVN by_II social_JJ stability_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, doctors–patients_NN2 ,_, lawyers–drug_VV0 users_NN2 ,_, or_CC people_NN )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 have_VH0 also_RR broken_JJ new_JJ ground_NN1 by_II discovering_VVG that_CST priming_VVG attachment_NN1 security_NN1 can_VM improve_VVI the_AT attitudes_NN2 of_IO those_DD2 with_IW a_AT1 fearful_JJ attachment_NN1 style_NN1 towards_II relational_JJ ,_, nonrelational_JJ ,_, and_CC distancedrelational_JJ therapies_NN2 and_CC that_CST the_AT mechanism_NN1 of_IO cognitive_JJ openness_NN1 mediates_VVZ some_DD of_IO these_DD2 effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT measure_NN1 was_VBDZ based_VVN on_II the_AT American_JJ Society_NN1 for_IF Addiction_NN1 Medicine_NN1 (_( ASAM_NP1 )_) criteria_NN2 for_IF patient_JJ placement_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ was_VBDZ initially_RR developed_VVN for_IF determining_VVG the_AT level_NN1 of_IO care_NN1 needed_VVN for_IF individuals_NN2 with_IW drug_NN1 or_CC alcohol_NN1 use_NN1 disorders_NN2 (_( Mee-Lee_NP1 &;_NULL Shulman_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Following_VVG this_DD1 logic_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT observation_NN1 that_CST in_II many_DA2 places_NN2 around_II the_AT world_NN1 women_NN2 and_CC men_NN2 self-select_JJ into_II married_JJ couples_NN2 ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ through_II assortative_JJ mating_NN1 that_CST women_NN2 and_CC men_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR more_RGR similar_JJ are_VBR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO join_VVI in_II relationships_NN2 with_IW one_PPX121 another_PPX122 than_CSN are_VBR women_NN2 and_CC men_NN2 with_IW divergent_JJ characteristics_NN2 (_( Luo_NP1 &;_NULL Klohnen_NP1 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, although_CS the_AT same_DA questionnaire_NN1 was_VBDZ used_VVN at_II baseline_NN1 and_CC 1_MC1 and_CC 2year_FO followup_NN1 ,_, changes_NN2 over_II time_NNT1 in_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 comprehension_NN1 of_IO the_AT questionnaire_NN1 and_CC ability_NN1 to_TO accurately_RR recall_VVI their_APPGE consumption_NN1 patterns_NN2 were_VBDR likely_JJ to_TO have_VHI changed_VVN substantially_RR overtime_RR ,_, and_CC as_CSA such_DA may_VM have_VHI impacted_VVN the_AT study_NN1 results_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB authors_NN2 read_VV0 and_CC approved_VVD the_AT final_JJ manuscript_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_PN1 might_VM expect_VVI range_NN1 and_CC rank_NN1 to_TO play_VVI separate_JJ roles_NN2 ,_, an_AT1 idea_NN1 instantiated_VVD in_II the_AT range_NN1 frequency_NN1 theory_NN1 of_IO the_AT evaluation_NN1 of_IO magnitudes_NN2 (_( Parducci_NP1 ,_, 1965_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, only_RR the_AT accuracy_NN1 measure_NN1 showed_VVD such_DA an_AT1 effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT above_JJ criteria_NN2 excluded_VVD twelve_MC children_NN2 and_CC identified_VVN forty-six_MC children_NN2 as_CSA typically_RR developing_VVG in_RP regards_VVZ to_II communication_NN1 and_CC vocabulary_NN1 development_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 findings_NN2 could_VM be_VBI accounted_VVN for_IF by_II many_DA2 factors_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 cultural_JJ and_CC societal_JJ differences_NN2 ,_, including_II differences_NN2 in_II child-rearing_NN1 practices_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 may_VM be_VBI possible_JJ to_TO increase_VVI perceived_JJ arrest_NN1 risk_NN1 by_II using_VVG public_JJ communications_NN2 that_CST target_VV0 heuristic_JJ updating_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA an_AT1 association_NN1 should_VM also_RR influence_VVI responses_NN2 on_II more_RGR implicit_JJ tasks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT age_NN1 conditions_NN2 featured_VVD male_JJ and_CC female_JJ sets_NN2 :_: one_MC1 featured_VVD the_AT same_DA four_MC white_JJ women_NN2 in_II their_APPGE 20_MC '_NULL s_ZZ1 from_II the_AT sex_NN1 conditions_NN2 and_CC four_MC white_JJ women_NN2 in_II their_APPGE 70_MC '_NULL s_ZZ1 ,_, the_AT other_NN1 featured_VVD the_AT same_DA four_MC white_JJ men_NN2 from_II the_AT race_NN1 conditions_NN2 and_CC four_MC white_JJ men_NN2 in_II their_APPGE 70_MC '_NULL s.8_FO Photos_NN2 of_IO targets_NN2 in_II their_APPGE 70_MC '_NULL s_ZZ1 came_VVD from_II the_AT Center_NN1 for_IF Vital_JJ Longevity_NN1 Face_NN1 Database_NN1 (_( Minear_NP1 &;_NULL Park_NN1 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Support_VV0 for_IF this_DD1 notion_NN1 can_VM be_VBI found_VVN in_II Millar_NP1 (_( 1981_MC )_) who_PNQS stated_VVD that_DD1 '_NULL Vision_NN1 is_VBZ neither_RR necessary_JJ nor_CC sufficient_JJ for_IF spatial_JJ tasks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, beyond_II these_DD2 computations_NN2 ,_, the_AT cue-based_JJ retrieval_NN1 account_NN1 further_RRR implies_VVZ that_CST representations_NN2 for_IF words_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 some_DD overlap_NN1 with_IW the_AT features_NN2 matching_VVG the_AT cues_NN2 will_VM provide_VVI interference_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consequently_RR ,_, the_AT decision_NN1 was_VBDZ made_VVN to_TO only_RR retain_VVI the_AT positive_JJ affect_NN1 (_( PA_NNU )_) scale_NN1 for_IF further_JJR analyses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
ST_NP1 was_NP1 funded_VVD by_II the_AT Wellcome_NP1 NIMA_NP1 Consortium_NN1 and_CC this_DD1 support_NN1 is_VBZ acknowledged_VVN here_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 wanted_VVD to_TO make_VVI sure_JJ that_CST any_DD links_NN2 we_PPIS2 might_VM observe_VVI between_II ToM_NP1 and_CC friendship_NN1 were_VBDR not_XX accidental_JJ by-products_NN2 of_IO individual_JJ differences_NN2 in_II language_NN1 skill_NN1 ,_, even_CS21 though_CS22 Peterson_NP1 and_CC Siegal_NP1 (_( 2002_MC )_) had_VHD previously_RR demonstrated_VVN language-independent_JJ links_NN2 between_II ToM_NP1 and_CC mutual_JJ friendship_NN1 in_II 4-year-olds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Starting_VVG from_II the_AT assumption_NN1 that_CST entrepreneurial_JJ orientation_NN1 can_VM be_VBI measured_VVN at_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO the_AT individual_JJ small_JJ business_NN1 owner_NN1 (_( Khedhaouria_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ,_, and_CC building_NN1 on_II the_AT perspective_NN1 that_CST ADHD_VV0 symptoms_NN2 can_VM be_VBI viewed_VVN as_CSA personal_JJ traits_NN2 with_IW both_DB2 bright_JJ and_CC dark_JJ sides_NN2 (_( Judge_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 examines_VVZ whether_CSW small_JJ firms_NN2 led_VVN by_II entrepreneurs_NN2 who_PNQS experience_VV0 ADHD_NN1 symptoms_NN2 exhibit_VV0 higher_JJR levels_NN2 of_IO entrepreneurial_JJ orientation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, none_PN of_IO the_AT associations_NN2 between_II parent_NN1 education_NN1 and_CC the_AT individual_JJ memory_NN1 tasks_NN2 reached_VVD significance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT fifth_MD limitation_NN1 is_VBZ the_AT use_NN1 of_IO super-ordinate_JJ categories_NN2 of_IO coping_VVG and_CC defences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Vantage_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 describes_VVZ the_AT propensity_NN1 to_TO respond_VVI favorably_RR to_II positive_JJ experiences_NN2 ,_, whereas_CS vantage_NN1 resistance_NN1 reflects_VVZ the_AT inability_NN1 to_TO benefit_VVI from_II supportive_JJ influences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT relatively_RR small_JJ effects_NN2 of_IO disidentification_NN1 from_II the_AT CU_FO (_( itself_PPX1 unrelated_JJ to_II being_VBG proEU_NN1 )_) ,_, and_CC its_APPGE direct_JJ relation_NN1 to_II collective_JJ action_NN1 ,_, suggest_VV0 that_CST the_AT Euromaidan_NP1 was_VBDZ not_XX as_RG antiRussian_JJ as_CSA the_AT intention_NN1 to_TO take_VVI action_NN1 itself_PPX1 was_VBDZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Which_DDQ of_IO situations_NN2 1_MC1 and_CC 2_MC shown_VVN in_II the_AT figures_NN2 below_RL do_VD0 you_PPY prefer_VVI ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 either_RR assessed_VVD radical_JJ actions_NN2 in_II self-reports_NN2 or_CC used_VVD an_AT1 imagined_JJ scenario_NN1 (_( Becker_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011b_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
PTSD_NP1 ,_, by_II definition_NN1 ,_, involves_VVZ experiencing_VVG and_CC reliving_VVG a_AT1 potentially_RR life-threatening_JJ event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS these_DD2 effects_NN2 were_VBDR replicated_VVN in_II Study_NN1 3_MC by_II employing_VVG a_AT1 similar_JJ procedure_NN1 ,_, future_JJ research_NN1 should_VM verify_VVI the_AT perceptions_NN2 of_IO instrumentality_NN1 and_CC humanness_NN1 by_II employing_VVG a_AT1 larger_JJR sample_NN1 size_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ guidelines_NN2 for_IF transgender_NN1 individuals_NN2 are_VBR forthcoming_JJ from_II APA_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Various_JJ theoretical_JJ models_NN2 of_IO psychological_JJ stress-responding_NN1 posit_VV0 dynamic_JJ and_CC fluid_NN1 consequences_NN2 of_IO stress_NN1 exposure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Upon_II completion_NN1 of_IO both_DB2 pre-tasks_NN2 ,_, the_AT participants_NN2 were_VBDR prepared_VVN for_IF stimulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
One_MC1 possibility_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 teaching_NN1 facilitates_VVZ accurate_JJ social_JJ transmission_NN1 by_II narrowing_VVG the_AT range_NN1 of_IO inferences_NN2 that_CST learners_NN2 make_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, the_AT correlation_NN1 effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 were_VBDR so_RG small_JJ (_( rho_NN1 ≤_FO .124_MC )_) that_CST statistical_JJ power_NN1 is_VBZ again_RT unlikely_JJ to_TO be_VBI an_AT1 explanation_NN1 ,_, and_CC there_EX was_VBDZ no_AT interaction_NN1 for_IF task_NN1 sensitivity_NN1 between_II LSHS-R_NP1 group_NN1 and_CC the_AT perceived_JJ or_CC imagined_JJ status_NN1 of_IO the_AT stimuli_NN2 ,_, as_CSA might_VM be_VBI expected_VVN if_CS the_AT deficit_NN1 related_VVN to_II the_AT inability_NN1 to_TO distinguish_VVI the_AT source_NN1 of_IO imagined_JJ information_NN1 from_II that_DD1 which_DDQ had_VHD been_VBN perceived_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO supplement_VVI the_AT database_NN1 searches_NN2 ,_, the_AT reference_NN1 lists_NN2 of_IO identified_JJ studies_NN2 were_VBDR examined_VVN along_II21 with_II22 those_DD2 of_IO recent_JJ reviews_NN2 (_( Dholakia_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Rodrigues_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Sprott_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA results_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST at_RR21 least_RR22 by_II the_AT age_NN1 of_IO six_MC ,_, the_AT principle_NN1 of_IO rational_JJ action_NN1 extends_VVZ to_II a_AT1 principle_NN1 of_IO rational_JJ choice_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, should_VM our_APPGE alpha_NN1 findings_NN2 be_VBI restricted_VVN to_TO motor_VVI control_NN1 and_CC execution_NN1 we_PPIS2 would_VM have_VHI expected_VVN to_TO find_VVI a_AT1 corresponding_JJ pattern_NN1 in_II the_AT beta_NN1 frequency_NN1 range_NN1 (_( 12-30_MCMC Hz_NNU )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS a_AT1 test_NN1 contains_VVZ many_DA2 items_NN2 ,_, then_RT the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 single_JJ confusing_JJ item_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX likely_JJ to_TO have_VHI a_AT1 large_JJ effect_NN1 on_II test_NN1 scores_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Counterproductive_JJ work_NN1 behavior_NN1 (_( CWB_NP1 )_) ,_, also_RR referred_VVN to_II as_CSA workplace_NN1 deviance_NN1 ,_, is_VBZ defined_VVN as_CSA voluntary_JJ behavior_NN1 that_CST violates_VVZ organizational_JJ norms_NN2 and_CC harms_VVZ the_AT organization_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE members_NN2 (_( Bennett_NP1 &;_NULL Robinson_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Mitchell_NP1 &;_NULL Ambrose_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 significant_JJ difference_NN1 between_II the_AT three_MC assessment_NN1 points_NN2 ,_, McNemar_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 tests_NN2 were_VBDR conducted_VVN to_TO compare_VVI the_AT change_NN1 over_II T1_FO and_CC T2_FO (_( i.e._REX baseline_NN1 period_NN1 )_) ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT change_NN1 over_II the_AT highest_JJT baseline_NN1 (_( i.e._REX T1_FO or_CC T2_FO )_) and_CC T3_FO (_( working_VVG memory_NN1 training_NN1 period_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS we_PPIS2 employed_VVD a_AT1 3-point_JJ scale_NN1 to_TO distinguish_VVI these_DD2 narratives_NN2 ,_, due_II21 to_II22 the_AT highly_RR subjective_JJ and_CC phenomenological_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO autobiographical_JJ narratives_NN2 ,_, the_AT permeability_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 3_MC "_" points_NN2 "_" should_VM be_VBI underscored_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT result_NN1 is_VBZ similar_JJ to_II distractor_NN1 suppression_NN1 previously_RR linked_VVN to_II the_AT Pd_NP1 component_NN1 (_( Mazza_NP1 ,_, Turatto_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Caramazza_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Sawaki_JJ &;_NULL Luck_NN1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR recent_JJ studies_NN2 of_IO idiosyncrasies_NN2 in_II pursuit_NN1 tracking_NN1 used_VVD 12_MC participants_NN2 (_( Miyake_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC )_) or_CC groups_NN2 of_IO 20_MC or_CC fewer_DAR participants_NN2 (_( Oishi_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Viviani_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, but_CCB did_VDD not_XX conduct_VVI a_AT1 similar_JJ analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 then_RT pressed_VVD a_AT1 button_NN1 to_TO display_VVI the_AT door_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Understanding_VVG that_DD1 health_NN1 matters_NN2 for_IF reentry_NN1 outcomes_NN2 and_CC recidivism_NN1 has_VHZ implications_NN2 for_IF correctional_JJ efforts_NN2 guided_VVN by_II the_AT RNR_NP1 model_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II an_AT1 increasing_JJ number_NN1 of_IO researchers_NN2 begin_VV0 to_TO engage_VVI communities_NN2 in_II their_APPGE work_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 measurements_NN2 will_VM help_VVI to_TO evaluate_VVI and_CC improve_VVI the_AT quality_NN1 of_IO CER_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II our_APPGE opinion_NN1 ,_, the_AT differences_NN2 between_II coping_VVG and_CC psychological_JJ defences_NN2 can_VM be_VBI advocated_VVN by_II theoretical_JJ criteria_NN2 ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 is_VBZ difficult_JJ to_TO decide_VVI in_II31 favour_II32 of_II33 their_APPGE independence_NN1 without_IW confirmation_NN1 from_II empirical_JJ studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT end_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 daily_JJ separation_NN1 session_NNT1 ,_, the_AT mothers_NN2 were_VBDR returned_VVN to_II their_APPGE home_NN1 cages_NN2 ;_; this_DD1 procedure_NN1 was_VBDZ carried_VVN out_RP during_II the_AT light_JJ part_NN1 of_IO the_AT cycle_NN1 ,_, between_II 8:00_MC a.m._RA and_CC 2:00_MC p.m_RA ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT mother_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 preoccupation_NN1 with_IW two_MC rather_II21 than_II22 one_MC1 baby_NN1 is_VBZ an_AT1 internal_JJ psychic_JJ phenomenon_NN1 that_CST changes_NN2 how_RRQ she_PPHS1 holds_VVZ (_( concretely_RR and_CC metaphorically_RR )_) each_DD1 of_IO the_AT babies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Congruent_JJ inclusion_NN1 situations_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR created_VVN ,_, in_II which_DDQ utilitarian_JJ and_CC deontological_JJ inclinations_NN2 are_VBR supposed_JJ to_TO lead_VVI to_II the_AT same_DA response_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Individuals_NN2 with_IW low_JJ personal_JJ innovativeness_NN1 have_VH0 a_AT1 strong_JJ preference_NN1 for_IF products_NN2 with_IW an_AT1 intervention_NN1 design_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD survey_NN1 measures_VVZ the_AT initial_JJ level_NN1 of_IO the_AT parameters_NN2 of_IO interest_NN1 ;_; the_AT second_MD survey_NN1 measures_VVZ whether_CSW a_AT1 significant_JJ change_NN1 in_II the_AT parameters_NN2 occurred_VVD after_II the_AT treatment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, detailed_JJ behavioral_NN1 and_CC health-related_JJ histories_NN2 and_CC current_JJ lifestyles_NN2 should_VM be_VBI considered_VVN essential_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF analyses_NN2 using_VVG the_AT 90_MC item_NN1 pairs_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 have_VH0 95%_NNU ,_, 90%_NNU ,_, and_CC 80%_NNU power_NN1 to_TO detect_VVI effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 (_( in_II r_ZZ1 )_) of.36_FO ,_, .33_MC ,_, and_CC .29_MC ,_, respectively_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Evaluation_NN1 evidence_NN1 has_VHZ found_VVN support_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 theoretical_JJ perspectives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similar_JJ studies_NN2 which_DDQ assessed_VVD memory_NN1 for_IF temporal_JJ or_CC spatial_JJ location_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, indicate_VV0 a_AT1 context_NN1 memory_NN1 benefit_NN1 for_IF emotional_JJ pictures_NN2 (_( Rimmele_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Schmidt_NP1 ,_, Patnaik_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Kensinger_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ,_, a_AT1 result_NN1 which_DDQ I_PPIS1 will_VM address_VVI later_RRR ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 ,_, clothing_NN1 was_VBDZ chosen_VVN as_II the_AT product_NN1 context_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO reasons_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Crucially_RR ,_, the_AT embodied_VVN cognitive_JJ account_NN1 of_IO language_NN1 predicts_VVZ that_CST the_AT semantic_JJ processing_NN1 of_IO pain-related_JJ words_NN2 will_VM re-activate_VVI the_AT areas_NN2 of_IO the_AT brain_NN1 that_CST are_VBR active_JJ when_CS people_NN actually_RR experience_VV0 pain_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT pain_NN1 matrix_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
According_II21 to_II22 the_AT instrument_NN1 developers_NN2 ,_, financial_JJ well-being_NN1 and_CC financial_JJ distress_NN1 are_VBR subjective_JJ phenomena_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Right_JJ Frontier_NN1 Constraint_NN1 states_VVZ that_CST ,_, given_VVN a_AT1 representation_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO clauses_NN2 in_II a_AT1 passage_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 subsequent_JJ clause_NN1 can_VM only_RR create_VVI a_AT1 new_JJ branch_NN1 at_II an_AT1 open_JJ node_NN1 on_II the_AT right_JJ edge_NN1 of_IO the_AT discourse_NN1 structure_NN1 ;_; other_JJ nodes_NN2 are_VBR unavailable_JJ because_CS they_PPHS2 represent_VV0 closed_JJ positions_NN2 (_( Polanyi_NP1 ,_, 1988_MC ;_; see_VV0 also_RR Asher_NP1 ,_, 1993_MC ;_; Asher_NP1 &;_NULL Lascarides_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 Innovation_NN1 card_NN1 used_VVN by_II the_AT players_NN2 was_VBDZ evaluated_VVN by_II the_AT Cool_JJ Choices_NN2 staff_NN and_CC assigned_VVN a_AT1 point_NN1 value_NN1 based_VVN on_II creativity_NN1 and_CC potential_JJ savings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, the_AT authors_NN2 thank_VV0 Debby_NP1 A._NP1 Daulay_NP1 and_CC Ade_NP1 R._NP1 Siregar_NP1 (_( University_NN1 of_IO Sumatera_NP1 Utara_NP1 ,_, Medan_NP1 ,_, Indonesia_NP1 )_) for_IF providing_VVG access_NN1 to_II the_AT schools_NN2 and_CC assisting_VVG during_II data_NN collection_NN1 in_II Medan_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Ranging_VVG from_II frequency_NN1 of_IO virtual_JJ interaction_NN1 (_( e.g._REX Lu_NP1 ,_, Watson-Manheim_NP1 ,_, Chudoba_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Wynn_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) to_II how_RRQ distributed_VVN the_AT team_NN1 actually_RR is_VBZ (_( e.g._REX Cohen_NP1 &;_NULL Gibson_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ,_, researchers_NN2 have_VH0 adopted_VVN multiple_NN1 ,_, unique_JJ methods_NN2 for_IF examining_VVG this_DD1 construct_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT suffix_NN1 -_- δ_FO /_FO '_NULL a._NNU a/_FU combines_VVZ with_IW nouns_NN2 or_CC adjectives_NN2 to_TO form_VVI nouns_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 o_ZZ1 τ_NULL o_ZZ1 /por.to_FU ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 means_VVZ that_CST there_EX eventually_RR might_VM be_VBI a_AT1 trade-off_NN1 between_II financial_JJ returns_NN2 and_CC social_JJ impact_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF political_JJ system_NN1 support_NN1 ,_, Bonferonni_JJ post-hoc_JJ comparisons_NN2 revealed_VVD that_CST the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO ethnicity_NN1 occurred_VVD because_CS Mori_NP1 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 3.73_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 1.54_MC )_) were_VBDR significantly_RR lower_JJR than_CSN Europeans_NN2 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 4.27_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 1.39_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ;_; Cohen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 d_ZZ1 =_FO -.37_MC )_) ,_, Asian_JJ (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 4.29_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 1.39_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ;_; Cohen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 d_ZZ1 =_FO -.38_MC )_) ,_, and_CC Pacific_NP1 people_NN (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 4.18_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 1.59_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ;_; Cohen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 d_ZZ1 =_FO -.29_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
H1_FO and_CC H2_FO from_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 were_VBDR tested_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Klein_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 2002_MC )_) terms_NN2 ,_, for_IF the_AT mentally_RR healthy_JJ ,_, specific_JJ negative_JJ memories_NN2 would_VM impose_VVI looser_JJR boundary_NN1 conditions_NN2 (_( as_CSA indexed_VVN by_II weaker_JJR priming_NN1 )_) on_II the_AT scope_NN1 of_IO positive_JJ summary_NN1 trait_NN1 information_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS for_IF those_DD2 who_PNQS are_VBR depressed_JJ ,_, positive_JJ memories_NN2 would_VM impose_VVI looser_JJR boundary_NN1 conditions_NN2 on_II the_AT scope_NN1 of_IO negative_JJ trait_NN1 summaries_NN2 ,_, thus_RR leading_VVG to_II systematic_JJ patterns_NN2 of_IO positive_JJ and_CC negative_JJ trait_NN1 bias_NN1 ,_, respectively_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Many_DA2 of_IO these_DD2 triangle_NN1 models_NN2 use_VV0 the_AT same_DA distributed_JJ connectionist_NN1 structure_NN1 described_VVN in_II the_AT previous_JJ section_NN1 ,_, where_CS word_NN1 forms_NN2 and_CC meanings_NN2 are_VBR represented_VVN as_CSA sparse_JJ patterns_NN2 of_IO binary_JJ activation_NN1 across_II a_AT1 large_JJ set_NN1 of_IO units_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Specifically_RR ,_, a_AT1 recent_JJ review_NN1 found_VVD that_CST individuals_NN2 with_IW lower_JJR resting_NN1 HRV_NP1 ,_, relative_II21 to_II22 individuals_NN2 with_IW higher_JJR resting_NN1 HRV_NP1 ,_, exhibit_VV0 attentional_JJ hypervigilance_NN1 to_II threat-relevant_JJ socio-affective_JJ stimuli_NN2 and_CC difficulty_NN1 disengaging_VVG and_CC inhibiting_VVG attention_NN1 to_II socio-affective_JJ stimuli_NN2 (_( for_IF review_NN1 ,_, see_VV0 Park_NP1 &;_NULL Thayer_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Much_DA1 of_IO the_AT research_NN1 evaluating_VVG PTSD-alcohol_JJ misuse_NN1 in_II women_NN2 has_VHZ been_VBN cross-sectional_JJ in_II nature_NN1 and_CC ,_, overall_RR ,_, supports_VVZ significant_JJ associations_NN2 between_II PTSD_NP1 and_CC AUDs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT current_JJ level_NN1 of_IO true_JJ parameter_NN1 values_NN2 ,_, any_DD choice_NN1 from_II them_PPHO2 would_VM thus_RR suffice_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, individuals_NN2 with_IW lower_JJR levels_NN2 of_IO selfrated_JJ health_NN1 at_II time_NNT1 t_ZZ1 reported_VVD higher_JJR cynicism_NN1 scores_NN2 at_II time_NNT1 t+1_FO (_( β_NULL =_FO .08_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC )_) ,_, when_CS controlling_VVG for_IF their_APPGE cynicism_NN1 level_NN1 at_II time_NNT1 t_ZZ1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT present_JJ case_NN1 ,_, the_AT abstract_JJ code_NN1 may_VM be_VBI specific_JJ to_II the_AT visual_JJ system_NN1 ,_, and_CC be_VBI a_AT1 natural_JJ consequence_NN1 of_IO the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST along_II stages_NN2 of_IO the_AT ventral_JJ pathway_NN1 representations_NN2 become_VV0 more_RGR invariant_JJ ,_, or_CC tolerant_JJ ,_, across_II transformations_NN2 of_IO the_AT viewpoint_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 stimulus_NN1 ;_; or_CC can_VM be_VBI recruited_VVN by_II purely_RR symbolic_JJ reference_NN1 to_II the_AT object_NN1 (_( e.g._REX novel_JJ character_NN1 strings_VVZ that_CST observers_NN2 learn_VV0 to_TO associate_VVI with_IW animals_NN2 and_CC tools_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 have_VH0 also_RR suggested_VVN that_CST there_EX are_VBR situations_NN2 where_RRQ leaders_NN2 suppress_VV0 their_APPGE character_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ builds_VVZ upon_II the_AT context_NN1 question_NN1 of_IO where_RRQ entanglement_NN1 is_VBZ likely_JJ to_TO occur_VVI ,_, and_CC this_DD1 can_VM be_VBI empirically_RR examined_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 strong_JJ ,_, corroborated_VVD alibi_NN1 can_VM be_VBI a_AT1 convincing_JJ defense_NN1 for_IF an_AT1 innocent_JJ suspect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL was_VBDZ a_AT1 sudden_JJ pivot_NN1 ,_, an_AT1 escape_NN1 from_II the_AT unfathomable_JJ possibility_NN1 :_: No_UH ,_, it_PPH1 wasn_VV0 '_NULL t_ZZ1 even_RR a_AT1 possibility_NN1 that_CST this_DD1 man_NN1 would_VM be_VBI elected_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Taken_VVN together_RL ,_, it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI concluded_VVN that_CST while_CS the_AT follow-up_JJ studies_NN2 to_II Ophir_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 2009_MC )_) pioneering_JJ study_NN1 reported_VVD evidence_NN1 suggestive_JJ of_IO various_JJ correlates_NN2 of_IO media_NN multitasking_VVG ,_, the_AT original_JJ findings_NN2 by_II Ophir_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
were_VBDR not_XX always_RR replicated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, group_NN1 EI_NP1 was_VBDZ associated_VVN with_IW higher_JJR group_NN1 school_NN1 performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT questionnaire_NN1 has_VHZ 60_MC items_NN2 that_CST are_VBR relevant_JJ for_IF 15_MC coping_VVG strategies_NN2 ,_, grouped_VVN in_II four_MC categories_NN2 :_: coping_VVG focused_VVN on_II the_AT problem_NN1 (_( coping_VVG strategies_NN2 included_VVD :_: planning_NN1 ,_, suppression_NN1 of_IO concurrent_JJ activities_NN2 and_CC affective_JJ coping_NN1 )_) ;_; coping_VVG focused_VVN on_II emotion_NN1 (_( coping_VVG strategies_NN2 included_VVD :_: acceptance_NN1 ,_, positive_JJ interpretation_NN1 and_CC growth_NN1 ,_, restraint_NN1 and_CC religious_JJ coping_NN1 )_) ;_; coping_VVG focused_VVN on_II search_NN1 for_IF social_JJ support_NN1 in_II dealing_VVG with_IW the_AT problem_NN1 (_( coping_VVG strategies_NN2 included_VVD :_: focus_VV0 on_RP and_CC venting_NN1 of_IO emotions_NN2 ,_, use_NN1 of_IO social-instrumental_JJ support_NN1 and_CC use_NN1 of_IO social-emotional_JJ support_NN1 )_) ;_; and_CC strategies_NN2 for_IF avoidance_NN1 of_IO the_AT problem_NN1 (_( coping_VVG strategies_NN2 involved_VVD :_: denial_NN1 ,_, mental_JJ disengagement_NN1 ,_, behavioural_JJ disengagement_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, in_II the_AT current_JJ context_NN1 ,_, the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO PI_NN1 on_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ExtB_NP1 is_VBZ estimated_VVN simultaneously_RR with_IW the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ExtB_NP1 on_II PI_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX was_VBDZ also_RR an_AT1 ineffective_JJ within-subjects_NN2 manipulation_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 pressure_NN1 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 failure_NN1 to_TO control_VVI the_AT number_NN1 of_IO stimuli_NN2 classified_VVN in_II speeded_JJ and_CC unspeeded_JJ conditions_NN2 (_( unspeeded_JJ participants_NN2 classified_VVN more_DAR triads_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Twenty-four_MC observers_NN2 (_( 16_MC females_NN2 ,_, mean_JJ age_NN1 23.4_MC years_NNT2 ,_, range_NN1 18–35_MCMC years_NNT2 )_) performed_VVD a_AT1 precision_NN1 visual_JJ working_JJ memory_NN1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_RRQ participants_NN2 were_VBDR instead_RR asked_VVN to_TO assign_VVI female_JJ and_CC male_JJ first_MD names_NN2 (_( instead_II21 of_II22 positive_JJ and_CC negative_JJ behaviours_NN2 )_) to_II the_AT two_MC groups_NN2 there_EX was_VBDZ no_AT such_DA bias_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR specifically_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 bolster_VV0 the_AT claim_NN1 that_CST participants_NN2 adopted_VVD the_AT confederate_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 while_CS upholding_VVG their_APPGE own_DA response_NN1 dimension_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT contrary_NN1 ,_, the_AT Laplacian_JJ transformation_NN1 ,_, once_RR applied_VVN ,_, does_VDZ not_XX require_VVI specific_JJ assumption_NN1 regarding_II the_AT identification_NN1 of_IO the_AT components_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, extant_JJ literature_NN1 specific_JJ to_II the_AT complex_JJ Australian_JJ Indigenous_JJ studies_NN2 space_NN1 points_VVZ to_II the_AT occurrence_NN1 of_IO critical_JJ reflection_NN1 within_II curricula_NN2 based_VVN on_II decolonial_JJ intentions_NN2 and_CC the_AT experience_NN1 of_IO transformative_JJ learning_NN1 (_( Bullen_NP1 &;_NULL Roberts_NP1 ,_, &lsqb;_( 7_MC &rsqb;_) ,_, &lsqb;_( 8_MC &rsqb;_) )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 are_VBR discussed_VVN in_II the_AT framework_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 collective_JJ positive_JJ psychology_NN1 approach_NN1 on_II micro-_NN1 and_CC macro-social_JJ processes_NN2 of_IO coping_VVG and_CC their_APPGE implications_NN2 for_IF social_JJ well-being_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA mentioned_VVN ,_, research_NN1 findings_NN2 regarding_II the_AT contribution_NN1 of_IO oral_JJ language_NN1 skills_NN2 to_II Chinese_JJ written_JJ composition_NN1 were_VBDR far_RG21 from_RG22 conclusive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT private_JJ school_NN1 was_VBDZ slightly_RR more_RGR affluent_JJ than_CSN the_AT seven_MC voucher_NN1 schools_NN2 included_VVN in_II the_AT sample_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 general_RR22 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD few_DA2 substantively_RR notable_JJ interaction_NN1 effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Several_DA2 aspects_NN2 of_IO the_AT community_NN1 were_VBDR associated_VVN with_IW feelings_NN2 of_IO loneliness_NN1 (_( Table_NN1 4_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT results_NN2 fail_VV0 to_TO confirm_VVI a_AT1 habitual_JJ trend_NN1 during_II adolescence_NN1 ,_, namely_REX the_AT fact_NN1 that_CST family_NN1 context_NN1 loses_VVZ ground_NN1 to_TO peer_VVI influence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
AS_CSA individuals_NN2 ,_, both_RR a_AT1 cognitive_JJ and_CC affective_JJ mechanism_NN1 of_IO action_NN1 could_VM be_VBI postulated_VVN for_IF the_AT intervention_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 therapeutic_JJ effects_NN2 (_( Stewart_NP1 &;_NULL Watt_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, distributive_JJ justice_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR related_JJ to_II satisfaction_NN1 with_IW the_AT results_NN2 obtained_VVN (_( Alexander_NP1 &;_NULL Ruderman_NP1 ,_, 1987_MC ;_; Kim_NP1 &;_NULL Mauborgne_NP1 ,_, 1993_MC )_) ,_, whereas_CS procedural_JJ justice_NN1 is_VBZ more_RGR associated_JJ with_IW the_AT legitimacy_NN1 and_CC trust_NN1 of_IO authorities_NN2 (_( Tyler_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Tyler_NP1 &;_NULL Blader_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC ;_; Tyler_NP1 &;_NULL Degoey_NP1 ,_, 1995_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 in_II the_AT high_JJ load_NN1 condition_NN1 were_VBDR given_VVN a_AT1 6-digit_JJ number_NN1 before_II reading_VVG each_DD1 behaviour_NN1 and_CC were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO report_VVI the_AT number_NN1 after_II the_AT behaviour_NN1 disappeared_VVD from_II the_AT computer_NN1 screen_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT idea_NN1 that_CST dysfunction_NN1 to_II multiple_JJ sites_NN2 or_CC networks_NN2 results_NN2 in_II poor_JJ procedural_JJ learning_NN1 is_VBZ consistent_JJ with_IW data_NN from_II brain_NN1 stimulation_NN1 studies_NN2 (_( Clerget_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Pascual-Leone_JJ et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1996_MC ;_; Torriero_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC ;_; Wilkinson_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Yet_RR ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 central_JJ tendency_NN1 it_PPH1 remains_VVZ the_AT case_NN1 that_CST the_AT Positive_JJ Relevance_NN1 items_NN2 are_VBR rated_VVN one_MC1 point_NN1 higher_RRR on_II the_AT reason-relation_JJ scale_NN1 than_CSN the_AT Irrelevance_NN1 items_NN2 on_II average_NN1 ,_, even_RR in_II the_AT presence_NN1 of_IO the_AT TF_NN1 cell_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA perceived_VVN supervisor_NN1 integrity_NN1 is_VBZ considered_VVN to_TO be_VBI an_AT1 unusual_JJ and_CC highly_RR valuable_JJ virtue_NN1 in_II a_AT1 face_NN1 culture_NN1 ,_, Chinese_JJ employees_NN2 might_VM be_VBI willing_JJ to_TO exhibit_VVI high_JJ commitment_NN1 to_II the_AT supervisor_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 high_JJ perceived_JJ integrity_NN1 even_CS21 when_CS22 the_AT supervisor_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX provide_VVI personal_JJ support_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 found_VVD evidence_NN1 of_IO sleep_NN1 disturbance_NN1 among_II adolescents_NN2 with_IW GAD_NN1 across_II both_DB2 subjective_JJ and_CC objective_JJ measures_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 evidence_NN1 for_IF connections_NN2 between_II sleep_NN1 and_CC current_JJ anxiety_NN1 and_CC depression_NN1 severity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT article_NN1 explains_VVZ why_RRQ that_DD1 finding_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX address_VVI the_AT issue_NN1 ,_, and_CC provides_VVZ empirical_JJ evidence_NN1 against_II the_AT suggested_JJ possibility_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT randomized_JJ assignment_NN1 ,_, Zi_NP1 ,_, merely_RR influences_VVZ the_AT probability_NN1 that_CST a_AT1 student_NN1 in_II the_AT mentoring_JJ group_NN1 receives_VVZ the_AT treatment_NN1 of_IO interest_NN1 ,_, Ti_NP1 ,_, where_CS Ti_NP1 represents_VVZ a_AT1 close_JJ relationship_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT relationship_NN1 between_II CSE_NN1 and_CC career_NN1 success_NN1 was_VBDZ studied_VVN by_II Judge_NN1 and_CC Hurst_NP1 (_( 2007_MC ,_, 2008_MC )_) ,_, Judge_VV0 ,_, Hurst_NP1 ,_, and_CC Simon_NP1 (_( 2009_MC )_) ,_, Ferris_NP1 ,_, Johnson_NP1 ,_, Rosen_NP1 ,_, Djurdjevic_NN1 ,_, Chang_NP1 ,_, and_CC Tan_NN1 (_( 2011_MC )_) ,_, and_CC Stumpp_NP1 ,_, Muck_NN1 ,_, Hulsheger_NP1 ,_, Judge_VV0 ,_, and_CC Maier_NP1 (_( 2010_MC )_) among_II others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE results_NN2 are_VBR in_II partial_JJ agreement_NN1 with_IW Lackschewitz_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2008_MC )_) and_CC Hirvikoski_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2009_MC )_) who_PNQS found_VVD similar_JJ pre-_JJ and_CC post-test_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO cortisol_NN1 in_II adults_NN2 with_IW ADHD_NP1 and_CC controls_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, in_II an_AT1 fMRI_NN2 study_VV0 ,_, Peterson_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2002_MC )_) examined_VVD the_AT performance_NN1 of_IO young_JJ bilingual_JJ adults_NN2 (_( M_ZZ1 =_FO 26.5_MC years_NNT2 )_) on_II the_AT Simon_NP1 task_NN1 with_IW participants_NN2 from_II different_JJ ethnic_JJ backgrounds_NN2 (_( Caucasian_NN1 ,_, Asian-Americans_NN2 )_) who_PNQS had_VHD English_JJ as_CSA their_APPGE native_JJ language_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, among_II those_DD2 sentenced_VVN to_TO serve_VVI time_NNT1 ,_, sentences_NN2 tend_VV0 to_TO be_VBI far_RG shorter_JJR in_II Denmark_NP1 than_CSN in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Rather_II21 than_II22 being_VBG considered_VVN a_AT1 characteristic_NN1 of_IO clients_NN2 ,_, resistance_NN1 is_VBZ inextricably_RR embedded_VVN in_II the_AT interpersonal_JJ process_NN1 between_II client_NN1 and_CC therapist_NN1 and_CC is_VBZ thus_RR considered_VVN a_AT1 measure_NN1 of_IO interpersonal_JJ process_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE regression_NN1 analysis_NN1 therefore_RR suggests_VVZ that_CST the_AT apparent_JJ boost_NN1 in_II memory_NN1 performance_NN1 for_IF unexpected_JJ outcomes_NN2 is_VBZ either_RR very_RG small_JJ and_CC not_XX worth_II the_AT additional_JJ model_NN1 complexity_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 extra_JJ parameter_NN1 or_CC is_VBZ due_II21 to_II22 noise_NN1 as_CSA these_DD2 means_NN are_VBR ,_, by_II definition_NN1 ,_, based_VVN on_II fewer_DAR data_NN points_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 mean_VV0 ,_, how_RRQ they_PPHS2 '_NULL ve_VV0 managed_VVN to_TO do_VDI that_DD1 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 differences_NN2 across_II informational_JJ contexts_NN2 highlight_VV0 the_AT need_NN1 for_IF further_JJR research_NN1 on_II the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO different_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO online_JJ information_NN1 search_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_RRR ,_, research_NN1 has_VHZ documented_VVN that_CST children_NN2 become_VV0 more_RGR rigid_JJ in_II their_APPGE conceptions_NN2 of_IO fairness_NN1 during_II this_DD1 period_NN1 ,_, reporting_VVG that_CST only_RR one_MC1 allocation_NN1 is_VBZ fair_JJ ,_, and_CC deviations_NN2 from_II that_DD1 allocation_NN1 are_VBR unfair_JJ (_( Damon_NP1 ,_, 1977_MC ;_; Sigelman_NP1 &;_NULL Waitzman_NP1 ,_, 1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
RDS_NN2 involves_VVZ recruitment_NN1 of_IO initial_NN1 ,_, "_" seed_NN1 "_" participants_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR identified_VVN as_CSA having_VHG social_JJ connections_NN2 relevant_JJ for_IF the_AT study_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 purpose_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, having_VHG several_DA2 friends_NN2 with_IW HIV_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, as_CSA we_PPIS2 did_VDD not_XX see_VVI a_AT1 significant_JJ correlation_NN1 between_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO familiarity_NN1 and_CC the_AT eye_NN1 movement_NN1 pattern_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI premature_JJ to_TO conclude_VVI that_DD1 lack_NN1 of_IO familiarity_NN1 with_IW the_AT antonyms_NN2 was_VBDZ the_AT main_JJ factor_NN1 behind_II the_AT adoption_NN1 of_IO the_AT contextual_JJ strategy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
F0_FO range_NN1 was_VBDZ measured_VVN by_II subtracting_VVG the_AT minimum_NN1 F0_FO from_II the_AT maximum_NN1 F0_FO value_NN1 for_IF each_DD1 speaker_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 second_MD reason_NN1 for_IF the_AT small_JJ adoption_NN1 rate_NN1 of_IO sustainable_JJ behaviors_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST so_RG many_DA2 campaigns_NN2 do_VD0 not_XX put_VVI enough_DD importance_NN1 on_II measurable_JJ behavior_NN1 change_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 line_II32 with_II33 the_AT Interface_NN1 Model_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 observations_NN2 suggest_VV0 that_CST spatial_JJ language_NN1 and_CC spatial_JJ gestures_NN2 can_VM be_VBI selectively_RR impaired_VVN and_CC speech_NN1 and_CC gesture_NN1 are_VBR generated_VVN by_II two_MC separate_JJ ,_, but_CCB related_JJ systems_NN2 (_( Kita_NP1 &;_NULL ?zyuerek_NN1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
AC_NN1 designs_NN2 typically_RR include_VV0 dimensions_NN2 that_CST refer_VV0 to_II job-related_JJ attributes_NN2 and_CC exercises_VVZ that_CST consist_VV0 of_IO a_AT1 series_NN of_IO miniaturized_JJ work_NN1 samples_NN2 designed_VVN to_TO elicit_VVI job-related_JJ managerial_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Tenants_NN2 ,_, on_II the_AT other_JJ hand_NN1 ,_, should_VM be_VBI less_RGR likely_JJ to_TO consider_VVI environmental_JJ consequences_NN2 despite_II their_APPGE repeated_JJ rental_NN1 of_IO the_AT same_DA parcel_NN1 of_IO land_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 thank_VV0 Julie_NP1 Dunsmore_NP1 for_IF her_APPGE contributions_NN2 to_II our_APPGE ideas_NN2 and_CC methodology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Credibility_NN1 in_II phenomenological_JJ studies_NN2 is_VBZ determined_VVN by_II the_AT researcher_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ability_NN1 to_TO correctly_RR reflect_VVI the_AT essence_NN1 of_IO the_AT phenomenon_NN1 as_CSA experienced_VVN by_II the_AT participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Lastly_RR they_PPHS2 filled_VVD out_RP the_AT post-interview_JJ questionnaire_NN1 and_CC were_VBDR debriefed_VVN about_II the_AT purpose_NN1 of_IO the_AT study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT potential_JJ conflict_NN1 of_IO interest_NN1 was_VBDZ reported_VVN by_II the_AT authors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 dyadic_JJ regulatory_JJ process_NN1 may_VM function_VVI differently_RR in_II minimally_RR stressful_JJ situations_NN2 ,_, as_CSA less_DAR demand_NN1 for_IF physiological_JJ regulation_NN1 may_VM be_VBI placed_VVN on_II the_AT dyad_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Such_DA biases_NN2 were_VBDR not_XX restricted_VVN to_II stereotypes_NN2 ,_, and_CC occurred_VVN for_IF expectations_NN2 regarding_II intro/extraversion_NN1 ,_, friendliness_NN1 ,_, and_CC intelligence_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Kulik_NP1 1983_MC ;_; Rothbart_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
1979_MC ;_; Williams_NP1 1976_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT 95%_NNU confidence_NN1 interval_NN1 was_VBDZ .02_MC ;_; .20_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II contrast_NN1 ,_, values_NN2 that_CST are_VBR likely_JJ to_TO motivate_VVI conflicting_JJ behaviour_NN1 are_VBR located_VVN at_II opposing_JJ sides_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 circle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ worth_II noting_VVG that_CST jobs_NN2 typically_RR characterized_VVN by_II high_JJ demands_NN2 and_CC low_JJ control_NN1 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 frontline_NN1 service_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, retail_JJ sales_NN ,_, restaurant_NN1 server_NN1 ,_, secretary_NN1 )_) and_CC manufacturing_NN1 occupations_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, machine_VV0 operators_NN2 ,_, welders_NN2 )_) ,_, employ_VV0 millions_NNO2 of_IO individuals_NN2 and_CC ,_, in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO frontline_NN1 service_NN1 jobs_NN2 ,_, are_VBR some_DD of_IO the_AT fastest_JJT growing_JJ occupations_NN2 in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 (_( Bureau_NN1 of_IO Labor_NN1 Statistics_NN ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Building_NN1 on_II this_DD1 seminal_JJ study_NN1 ,_, other_JJ investigators_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Korja_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) have_VH0 examined_VVN whether_CSW parents_NN2 '_NULL representations_NN2 of_IO their_APPGE children_NN2 (_( rather_II21 than_II22 their_APPGE own_DA caregivers_NN2 )_) might_VM provide_VVI a_AT1 more_RGR direct_JJ predictor_NN1 of_IO the_AT quality_NN1 of_IO parent-child_NN1 interactions_NN2 and_CC child_NN1 outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX was_VBDZ also_RR a_AT1 non-significant_JJ trend_NN1 to_II an_AT1 interaction_NN1 effect_NN1 whereby_RRQ the_AT association_NN1 was_VBDZ stronger_JJR for_IF those_DD2 exposed_VVN to_II family_NN1 adversity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW the_AT king_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 anxious_JJ approval_NN1 ,_, the_AT "_" sage_NN1 removed_VVD his_APPGE clothes_NN2 ,_, and_CC joining_VVG the_AT prince_NN1 under_II the_AT table_NN1 ,_, began_VVD to_II crow_NN1 like_II a_AT1 rooster_NN1 "_" (_( p._NNU 170_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Unlike_II the_AT continuous_JJ paradigm_NN1 ,_, the_AT blocked-cyclic_JJ paradigm_NN1 allows_VVZ participants_NN2 to_TO render_VVI the_AT naming_NN1 process_NN1 more_RGR efficient_JJ by_II making_VVG use_NN1 of_IO the_AT structured_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT naming_NN1 lists_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, while_CS the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 large-scale_JJ drought_NN1 on_II water_NN1 supply_NN1 are_VBR apparent_JJ ,_, the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO a_AT1 water_NN1 shortage_NN1 on_II power_NN1 supplies_NN2 are_VBR less_RGR obvious_JJ to_II the_AT general_JJ population_NN1 because_CS they_PPHS2 might_VM not_XX be_VBI aware_JJ of_IO the_AT interdependence_NN1 of_IO the_AT two_MC critical_JJ infrastructures_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 adopted_VVD the_AT Italian_JJ version_NN1 of_IO the_AT Matching_JJ Familiar_JJ Figures_NN2 Test_VV0 (_( Cornoldi_NP1 ,_, Gardinale_NP1 ,_, Masi_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Pettenò_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_VVN the_AT amount_NN1 of_IO time_NNT1 it_PPH1 takes_VVZ for_IF partnerships_NN2 to_TO develop_VVI and_CC change_VVI when_CS administering_VVG this_DD1 comprehensive_JJ tool_NN1 longitudinally_RR ,_, to_TO assess_VVI change_NN1 in_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO community_NN1 engagement_NN1 over_II the_AT course_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 project_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 suggest_VV0 biannual_JJ intervals_NN2 as_II the_AT minimum_JJ time_NNT1 between_II assessments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS A_ZZ1 ,_, then_RT C_NP1 '_NULL to_TO be_VBI P_NNU (_( C_ZZ1 |_NULL A_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 process_NN1 is_VBZ independent_JJ of_IO any_DD specific_JJ criminal_JJ opportunity_NN1 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 involves_VVZ durable_JJ change_NN1 in_II someone_PN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 general_JJ perception_NN1 of_IO personal_JJ arrest_NN1 risk_NN1 for_IF broad_JJ categories_NN2 of_IO crime_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, violent_JJ vs._II nonviolent_JJ or_CC solitary_JJ vs._II group_NN1 crimes_NN2 ;_; Anwar_NP1 and_CC Loughran_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Loughran_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Time_NNT1 ranges_NN2 of_IO S_ZZ1 and_CC R_ZZ1 were_VBDR allowed_VVN to_TO completely_RR overlap_VVI ,_, by_II defining_VVG S_ZZ1 to_TO range_VVI between_II 0_MC ms_NN1 and_CC 900_MC ms_NN1 (_( with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 target_NN1 onset_NN1 )_) and_CC R_ZZ1 to_TO range_VVI between_II 400_MC ms_NN1 and_CC +400_MC ms_NN1 (_( with_II31 respect_II32 to_II33 RT_NP1 )_) for_IF SOAs_NN2 100-500_MCMC ,_, and_CC 300_MC ms_NN1 to_II +400_MC ms_NN1 for_IF SOA0_FO (_( to_TO include_VVI fast_JJ RTs_NP1 of_IO <300_FO ms_NN1 in_II this_DD1 condition_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Under_II such_DA circumstances_NN2 ,_, the_AT younger_JJR children_NN2 were_VBDR imputing_VVG the_AT agent_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 mental_JJ state_NN1 without_IW interference_NN1 from_II linguistic_JJ information_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, for_IF people_NN who_PNQS carry_VV0 weak_JJ recycling_NN1 attitude_NN1 ,_, strong_JJ subjective_JJ norm_NN1 would_VM substantially_RR boost_VVI their_APPGE intention_NN1 to_TO perform_VVI recycling_VVG behaviors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Speech_NN1 ,_, gesture_NN1 ,_, narrative_JJ structure_NN1 score_NN1 ,_, and_CC first_MD person_NN1 speech_NN1 for_IF the_AT recall_NN1 session_NNT1 were_VBDR coded_VVN as_CSA described_VVN above_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, the_AT alternative_NN1 slope-intercept_VV0 reparameterization_NN1 of_IO the_AT 3PL_FO model_NN1 appears_VVZ to_TO have_VHI a_AT1 serious_JJ impact_NN1 on_II the_AT linking_NN1 problem_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Study_NN1 3_MC also_RR found_VVN support_NN1 using_VVG giving_VVG observed_VVN in_II an_AT1 experiment_NN1 ,_, albeit_CS with_IW three_MC limitations_NN2 already_RR noted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS some_DD authors_NN2 have_VH0 raised_VVN doubts_NN2 about_II the_AT stability_NN1 of_IO the_AT two-factor_JJ PPI_JJ factor_NN1 structure_NN1 reported_VVN by_II Lilienfeld_NP1 and_CC Andrews_NP1 (_( 1996_MC ;_; e.g._REX ,_, Malterer_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ,_, Uzieblo_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ,_, we_PPIS2 chose_VVD to_TO utilize_VVI this_DD1 widely-used_JJ factor_NN1 structure_NN1 to_TO ensure_VVI our_APPGE findings_NN2 could_VM be_VBI considered_VVN in_II31 light_II32 of_II33 the_AT empirical_JJ literature_NN1 of_IO the_AT PPI_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO encourage_VVI evaluators_NN2 to_TO engage_VVI more_RRR with_IW the_AT guidance_NN1 and_CC base_VVI their_APPGE final_JJ credibility_NN1 judgments_NN2 on_II this_DD1 specific_JJ information_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 would_VM be_VBI better_JJR to_TO use_VVI methods_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 the_AT Psychologically_RR Based_VVN Credibility_NN1 Assessment_NN1 Tool_NN1 (_( Evans_NP1 ,_, Michael_NP1 ,_, Meissner_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Brandon_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) that_CST include_VV0 the_AT rating_NN1 of_IO diagnostic_JJ cues_NN2 in_II the_AT final_JJ credibility_NN1 assessment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
R_ZZ1 is_VBZ calculated_VVN in_II time_NNT1 steps_NN2 of_IO 0.01_MC s_ZZ1 in_II all_DB our_APPGE simulations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interests_NN2 are_VBR always_RR related_VVN to_II particular_JJ content_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, a_AT1 material_NN1 object_NN1 ,_, topic_NN1 ,_, activity_NN1 ,_, or_CC idea_NN1 ;_; Renninger_NP1 and_CC Hidi_NP1 2016_MC ,_, p._NN1 16_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Targets_NN2 all_DB had_VHD neutral_JJ expressions_NN2 and_CC wore_VVD gray_JJ t-shirts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR relevant_JJ ,_, however_RR ,_, are_VBR the_AT construct_NN1 reliability_NN1 estimates-that_CST is_VBZ ,_, the_AT reliability_NN1 estimated_VVN for_IF the_AT emotion_NN1 measurement_NN1 score_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT children_NN2 of_IO device-focused_JJ parents_NN2 were_VBDR older_JJR than_CSN the_AT children_NN2 of_IO content-focused_JJ parents_NN2 ,_, and_CC older_JJR children_NN2 generally_RR had_VHN higher_JJR device_NN1 skills_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT observed_JJ patterns_NN2 of_IO '_NULL dips_NN2 '_NULL in_II personality_NN1 maturation_NN1 have_VH0 previously_RR been_VBN shown_VVN to_TO be_VBI especially_RR prominent_JJ during_II the_AT biological_JJ ,_, social_JJ ,_, and_CC psychological_JJ transitions_NN2 from_II adolescence_NN1 to_II emerging_JJ adulthood_NN1 (_( disruption_NN1 hypothesis_NN1 ;_; Soto_NP1 &;_NULL Tackett_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Soto_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 also_RR were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO indicate_VVI their_APPGE age_NN1 in_II years_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ hypothesized_VVN ,_, therefore_RR ,_, that_DD1 social_JJ support_NN1 from_II family_NN1 ,_, friends_NN2 and_CC teachers_NN2 ,_, will_VM have_VHI a_AT1 direct_JJ impact_NN1 on_II individual_JJ psychological_JJ variables_NN2 (_( self-concept_NN1 and_CC resilience_NN1 )_) and_CC in_II turn_NN1 ,_, these_DD2 will_VM impact_NN1 on_II school_NN1 adjustment_NN1 (_( school_NN1 engagement_NN1 )_) and_CC (_( subjective_JJ wellness_NN1 )_) ,_, taking_VVG on_RP a_AT1 role_NN1 of_IO mediating_VVG variables_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, each_DD1 item_NN1 loads_NN2 onto_II both_DB2 the_AT general_JJ factor_NN1 and_CC at_RR21 most_RR22 one_MC1 specific_JJ factor_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RG far_RR ,_, the_AT adult-like_JJ pattern_NN1 of_IO pseudoneglect_NN1 has_VHZ been_VBN observed_VVN in_II school-aged_JJ children_NN2 and_CC occasionally_RR also_RR in_II kindergarten_NN1 children_NN2 approaching_VVG school_NN1 age_NN1 (_( around_II 5–6years_NN2 )_) (_( Bradshaw_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1988_MC ,_, De_NP1 Agostini_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1999_MC ,_, Failla_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC ,_, Girelli_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2017_MC ,_, Hausmann_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Critically_RR ,_, nearly_RR 30_MC of_IO the_AT targets_NN2 were_VBDR "_" ultra-rare_JJ "_" -they_PPHS2 appeared_VVD in_II less_DAR than_CSN 0.15%_FO of_IO all_DB trials_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ unknown_JJ if_CS the_AT OFC_NN1 changes_NN2 persist_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE goal_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO build_VVI an_AT1 empirically_RR based_VVN ABM_NP1 using_VVG realistic_JJ population_NN1 density_NN1 ,_, officers_NN2 per_II population_NN1 ,_, and_CC other_JJ baseline_NN1 attributes_VVZ that_CST reflect_VV0 the_AT average_NN1 across_II the_AT top_NN1 20_MC largest_JJT cities_NN2 in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT subsequent_JJ ,_, conditional_JJ models_NN2 included_VVD the_AT following_JJ predictors_NN2 :_: condition_NN1 ,_, ability_NN1 category_NN1 ,_, and_CC test_VV0 anxiety_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, Nardulli_NP1 ,_, Eisenstein_NP1 ,_, and_CC Flemming_NP1 (_( 1988_MC :_: 30_MC )_) pointed_VVD to_II environmental_JJ factors_NN2 that_CST include_VV0 socioeconomic_JJ structure_NN1 ,_, political_JJ makeup_NN1 ,_, and_CC "_" a_AT1 structural-legal_JJ domain_NN1 embodying_VVG relevant_JJ laws_NN2 ,_, codes_NN2 ,_, and_CC rules_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 facilities_NN2 ._. "_" 
</s>
<s>
Postman_NN1 and_CC Phillips_NP1 (_( 1954_MC )_) were_VBDR referring_VVG to_II the_AT relevance_NN1 of_IO distinctive_JJ features_NN2 to_II the_AT learner_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 task_NN1 during_II encoding_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ wide_JJ heterogeneity_NN1 in_II the_AT capacity_NN1 and_CC inclination_NN1 for_IF abstract_JJ and_CC otherwise_RR effortful_JJ thinking_NN1 (_( Pickett_NP1 and_CC Bushway_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Thomas_NP1 ,_, Loughran_NP1 ,_, and_CC Piquero_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II a_AT1 descriptive_JJ level_NN1 ,_, the_AT willingness_NN1 to_TO share_VVI in_II effort_NN1 and_CC cheating_VVG DG_NP1 thus_RR strongly_RR corresponded_VVN to_II the_AT pattern_NN1 observed_VVN in_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO determine_VVI whether_CSW children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 learning_VVG history_NN1 impacts_NN2 their_APPGE transmission_NN1 of_IO information_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 conducted_VVD three_MC studies_NN2 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 100_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Despite_II this_DD1 statistical_JJ indistinguishability_NN1 ,_, one_MC1 group_NN1 exhibited_VVD improved_JJ mental_JJ health_NN1 and_CC the_AT other_JJ group_NN1 exhibited_VVD deteriorated_VVD mental_JJ health_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE central_JJ claim_NN1 is_VBZ that_CST ,_, ceteris_RR21 paribus_RR22 ,_, without_IW an_AT1 affordable_JJ ,_, long-run_JJ edition_NN1 of_IO the_AT work_NN1 ,_, its_APPGE content_NN1 would_VM never_RR have_VHI resonated_VVN with_IW the_AT sociological_JJ community_NN1 at_RR21 large_RR22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 showed_VVD that_CST H1_FO and_CC H2_FO were_VBDR supported_VVN (_( but_CCB not_XX H3_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 pooled_VVD data_NN from_II samples_NN2 #1_NNU and_CC #2_NNU for_IF all_DB analyses_NN2 involving_VVG the_AT DoPL_NN1 scales_NN2 and_CC UMS_NP2 power_NN1 ;_; analyses_NN2 involving_VVG the_AT DoPL_NN1 and_CC the_AT PRF_NP1 scales_NN2 were_VBDR only_RR based_VVN on_II sample_NN1 #2_NNU '_NULL s_ZZ1 data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II a_AT1 final_JJ check_NN1 of_IO consistency_NN1 ,_, 10%_NNU of_IO abstracts_NN2 were_VBDR re-screened_VVN by_II one_MC1 other_JJ author_NN1 and_CC discrepancies_NN2 in_II this_DD1 were_VBDR discussed_VVN before_II making_VVG adjustments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT findings_NN2 are_VBR discussed_VVN in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 the_AT effectiveness_NN1 of_IO different_JJ parent_NN1 support_NN1 strategies_NN2 for_IF children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 use_NN1 of_IO interactive_JJ devices_NN2 and_CC learning_NN1 of_IO educational_JJ content_NN1 during_II the_AT preschool_JJ years_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 randomized_VVD whether_CSW the_AT question_NN1 asked_VVD 1_MC1 )_) about_II the_AT overall_JJ chance_NN1 of_IO arrest_NN1 in_II this_DD1 scenario_NN1 or_CC 2_MC )_) about_II the_AT chance_NN1 of_IO arrest_NN1 specifically_RR because_II21 of_II22 police_NN2 tracking_VVG the_AT iPhone_NN1 (_( see_VV0 table_NN1 A.4_FO in_II appendix_NN1 A_ZZ1 in_II the_AT online_JJ supporting_JJ information_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Subjects_NN2 were_VBDR randomly_RR matched_VVN with_IW another_DD1 subject_NN1 who_PNQS had_VHD been_VBN assigned_VVN the_AT same_DA letter_NN1 in_II the_AT other_JJ room_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE research_NN1 contributes_VVZ to_TO IM_VVI ,_, deception_NN1 ,_, and_CC personnel_NN2 selection_NN1 research_NN1 in_II several_DA2 ways_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO conclude_VVI ,_, we_PPIS2 find_VV0 that_DD1 labor_NN1 market_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 marriage_NN1 market_NN1 returns_NN2 are_VBR important_JJ determinants_NN2 of_IO the_AT college_NN1 enrollment_NN1 decision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, the_AT cortical_JJ surface_NN1 and_CC the_AT main_JJ subcortical_JJ brain_NN1 structures_NN2 were_VBDR labeled_VVN on_II their_APPGE T1-weighted_JJ anatomical_JJ image_NN1 ,_, providing_VVG a_AT1 segmentation_NN1 that_CST retains_VVZ the_AT personal_JJ anatomy_NN1 (_( Magalh?es_NP2 ,_, Marques_NP1 ,_, Soares_NP1 ,_, Alves_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Sousa_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_II this_DD1 end_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 computed_VVD a_AT1 '_NULL recall-to-reject_JJ '_NULL measure_NN1 calculated_VVN as_II the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO '_NULL remember_VV0 new_JJ '_NULL responses_NN2 minus_II the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO '_NULL remember_VV0 '_NULL misses_NN2 ,_, and_CC a_AT1 '_NULL recall-to-accept_VV0 '_NULL measure_NN1 calculated_VVN as_II the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO '_NULL remember_VV0 old_JJ '_NULL responses_NN2 minus_II the_AT proportion_NN1 of_IO '_NULL remember_VV0 '_NULL false_JJ alarms_NN2 (_( Migo_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, Western_JJ societies_NN2 characteristically_RR exhibit_VV0 stronger_JJR propensities_NN2 towards_II individualism_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ implies_VVZ a_AT1 more_RGR loosely_RR knit_VV0 social_JJ fabric_NN1 in_II which_DDQ people_NN are_VBR expected_VVN to_TO care_VVI primarily_RR for_IF themselves_PPX2 and_CC their_APPGE immediate_JJ family_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Based_VVN on_II a_AT1 growing_JJ consensus_NN1 that_CST "_" in_II principle_NN1 ,_, the_AT scope_NN1 of_IO practical_JJ theology_NN1 is_VBZ almost_RR infinite_JJ ,_, "_" (_( Woodward_NP1 &;_NULL Pattison_NP1 ,_, as_CSA cited_VVN in_II Greider_NP1 2008_MC ,_, p._NN1 52_MC )_) at_II a_AT1 minimum_NN1 this_DD1 requires_VVZ students_NN2 to_TO have_VHI the_AT capacity_NN1 to_TO set_VVI their_APPGE own_DA boundaries_NN2 for_IF learning_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT interviewer-child_JJ interview_NN1 was_VBDZ coded_VVN for_IF children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 responses_NN2 to_II the_AT yes/no_UH questions_NN2 about_II toy_NN1 play_NN1 (_( 98%_NNU agreement_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, in_II the_AT present_JJ studies_NN2 we_PPIS2 tested_VVD the_AT predictions_NN2 of_IO IER_NN1 while_CS controlling_VVG for_IF reappraisal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT question_NN1 is_VBZ neither_RR capricious_JJ nor_CC itself_PPX1 insane_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Between_II 2005_MC and_CC 2010_MC ,_, state_VV0 legislatures_NN2 enacted_VVD more_DAR than_CSN 300_MC antiimmigration_NN1 laws_NN2 (_( Gulasekaram_NP1 and_CC Ramakrishnan_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, including_II regulations_NN2 that_CST deny_VV0 public_JJ benefits_NN2 ,_, services_NN2 ,_, and_CC health_NN1 care_NN1 to_II unauthorized_JJ immigrants_NN2 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 laws_NN2 that_CST punish_VV0 employers_NN2 who_PNQS hire_VV0 undocumented_JJ workers_NN2 and_CC landlords_NN2 who_PNQS rent_VV0 to_II unauthorized_JJ immigrants_NN2 (_( Varsanyi_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR specifically_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 expect_VV0 discrete_JJ time_NNT1 parameter_NN1 estimates_NN2 &lsqb;_( i.e._REX ,_, A_ZZ1 j_ZZ1 ,_, i_ZZ1 ,_, Si_FW j_ZZ1 ,_, i_ZZ1 ,_, i_ZZ1 j_ZZ1 ,_, i_ZZ1 &rsqb;_) for_IF observed_JJ time_NNT1 intervals_NN2 to_TO be_VBI identical_JJ for_IF both_DB2 approaches_NN2 if_CS time_NNT1 intervals_NN2 are_VBR the_AT same_DA (_( for_IF all_DB j_ZZ1 and_CC i_ZZ1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II this_DD1 plane_NN1 ,_, the_AT third_MD ventricle_NN1 ,_, anterior_JJ horns_NN2 of_IO the_AT lateral_JJ ventricles_NN2 ,_, the_AT thalami_NN2 and_CC the_AT anatomic_JJ site_NN1 of_IO the_AT basal_JJ ganglia_NN2 are_VBR depicted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, in_II the_AT context_NN1 of_IO the_AT mnemic_JJ neglect_NN1 paradigm_NN1 ,_, the_AT MNE_NN1 requires_VVZ that_DD1 self-protection_NN1 operate_VV0 on_II feedback_NN1 encoding_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF the_AT remaining_JJ studies_NN2 ,_, however_RR ,_, the_AT results_NN2 show_VV0 compelling_JJ support_NN1 for_IF the_AT skeptic_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 H0_FO )_) ,_, with_IW Bayes_NP1 factors_NN2 ranging_VVG from_II about_RG 23_MC to_II about_RG 47_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
Data_NN obtained_VVN were_VBDR individual_JJ level_JJ death_NN1 records_NN2 and_CC census_NN1 population_NN1 estimates_VVZ by_II single_JJ year_NNT1 of_IO age_NN1 (_( 0–85+_FO )_) and_CC sex_NN1 for_IF small_JJ geographical_JJ areas_NN2 (_( postcode_VV0 sector_NN1 )_) at_II each_DD1 of_IO the_AT four_MC most_RGT recent_JJ census_NN1 years_NNT2 in_II Scotland_NP1 (_( 1981_MC ,_, 1991_MC ,_, 2001_MC ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD that_CST the_AT length_NN1 of_IO interaction_NN1 time_NNT1 participants_NN2 spent_VVN together_RL moderated_VVD the_AT gender_NN1 gap_NN1 in_II leadership_NN1 emergence_NN1 ,_, similar_JJ to_II the_AT findings_NN2 of_IO Eagly_NP1 and_CC Karau_NP1 (_( 1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 notable_JJ trend_NN1 in_II Fig._NN1 2_MC for_IF the_AT NEs_NP2 '_NULL appraisal_NN1 ,_, compared_VVN to_II their_APPGE E_ZZ1 counterparts_NN2 ,_, to_TO be_VBI more_RRR polarized_VVN ,_, manifested_VVN by_II displacing_VVG points_NN2 for_IF Abstract_JJ paintings_NN2 further_RRR to_II the_AT left_JJ and_CC for_IF Representation_NN1 paintings_NN2 further_RRR to_II the_AT right_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 analyzed_VVD the_AT gait_NN1 example_NN1 data_NN again_RT using_VVG the_AT original_JJ GSCA_NN1 in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO illustrate_VVI the_AT usefulness_NN1 of_IO the_AT proposed_JJ method_NN1 over_II the_AT original_JJ GSCA_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR two_MC prefatory_JJ notes_NN2 :_: First_MD ,_, another_DD1 system_NN1 for_IF accrediting_VVG psychology_NN1 graduate_NN1 and_CC internship_NN1 programs_NN2 has_VHZ emerged_VVN ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, the_AT Psychological_JJ Clinical_JJ Science_NN1 Accreditation_NN1 System_NN1 (_( PCSAS_NP2 )_) ,_, developed_VVN and_CC advanced_VVN by_II the_AT Academy_NN1 of_IO Psychological_JJ Clinical_JJ Science_NN1 (_( APCS_NP2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 instance_REX22 ,_, the_AT average_JJ freRRT_NN1 (_( Donovan_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2003_MC ;_; Ko_NN1 quency_NN1 of_IO faking_VVG across_II all_DB items_NN2 was_VBDZ about_RG 20_MC per_NNU21 cent_NNU22 in_II the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 vs._II 28_MC per_NNU21 cent_NNU22 in_II Donovan_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS not_XX large_JJ ,_, these_DD2 differences_NN2 may_VM be_VBI due_II21 to_II22 applicants_NN2 '_NULL experience_VV0 and_CC age_NN1 (_( i.e._REX 28_MC years_NNT2 old_JJ in_II our_APPGE sample_NN1 vs._II 19-20_MCMC years_NNT2 old_JJ in_II Donovan_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
An_AT1 example_NN1 is_VBZ taken_VVN from_II Fanon_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 1963_MC )_) interview_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 14-year-old_JJ Algerian_JJ boy_NN1 who_PNQS murdered_VVD a_AT1 French_NN1 teenagerostensibly_RR a_AT1 friend_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 average_NN1 of_IO 20.01_MC robberies_NN2 (_( SD_NP1 =_FO 4.98_MC )_) across_II simulations_NN2 on_II day_NNT1 35_MC with_IW random_JJ patrol_NN1 as_CSA compared_VVN with_IW 18.51_MC robberies_NN2 (_( SD_NP1 =_FO 4.41_MC )_) with_IW high-intensity_JJ hot_JJ spots_NN2 policing_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, if_CS a_AT1 person_NN1 is_VBZ employed_VVN in_II a_AT1 job_NN1 whose_DDQGE status_NN1 or_CC pay_NN1 is_VBZ less_DAR than_CSN what_DDQ they_PPHS2 can_VM achieve_VVI through_II their_APPGE cognitive_JJ or_CC non-cognitive_JJ abilities_NN2 ,_, they_PPHS2 will_VM tend_VVI to_TO gravitate_VVI towards_II jobs_NN2 that_CST fit_VV0 with_IW these_DD2 abilities_NN2 (_( see_VV0 Judge_NN1 ,_, Livingston_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Hurst_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Seibert_NP1 &;_NULL Kraimer_NP1 ,_, 2001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO register_VVI as_II a_AT1 potential_JJ participant_NN1 ,_, subjects_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO complete_VVI an_AT1 online_JJ assessment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, these_DD2 parameters_NN2 can_VM only_RR be_VBI compared_VVN if_CS we_PPIS2 know_VV0 the_AT function_NN1 that_CST maps_VVZ the_AT set_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE values_NN2 for_IF one_MC1 calibration_NN1 onto_II those_DD2 for_IF the_AT other_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Anxiety-based_JJ models_NN2 of_IO eating_VVG pathology_NN1 (_( Brown_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2017_MC ;_; Hildebrandt_NP1 ,_, Bacow_NP1 ,_, Markella_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Loeb_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Murray_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2018_MC ;_; Murray_NP1 ,_, Treanor_NP1 ,_, et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016_MC )_) often_RR draw_VV0 upon_II extensive_JJ overlap_NN1 between_II genetic_JJ risk_NN1 factors_NN2 ,_, neurocognitive_JJ deficits_NN2 ,_, and_CC temperament_NN1 and_CC personality_NN1 traits_NN2 between_II anxiety_NN1 and_CC EDs_NN2 (_( Kaye_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC ;_; Kerr-Gaffney_NN1 ,_, Harrison_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Tchanturia_NP1 ,_, 2018_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Usually_RR there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 casual_JJ atmosphere_NN1 where_RRQ students_NN2 feel_VV0 free_JJ to_TO talk_VVI with_IW the_AT teacher_NN1 about_II all_DB sorts_NN2 of_IO things_NN2 that_CST interest_VV0 them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT two_MC device_NN1 skill_NN1 variables_NN2 (_( i.e._REX keyboard_NN1 identification_NN1 and_CC mousing_VVG ability_NN1 )_) were_VBDR averaged_VVN to_TO create_VVI a_AT1 pretest_NN1 device_NN1 skill_NN1 variable_NN1 and_CC a_AT1 posttest_JJT device_NN1 skill_NN1 variable_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_CS manner_NN1 and_CC path_NN1 are_VBR linguistically_RR encoded_VVN in_II two_MC planning_NN1 units_NN2 ,_, two_MC gestures_NN2 express_VV0 manner_NN1 and_CC path_NN1 separately_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, the_AT greater_JJR use_NN1 and_CC reliance_NN1 of_IO technology_NN1 ,_, compared_VVN to_II more_RGR traditional_JJ team_NN1 settings_NN2 ,_, provides_VVZ employers_NN2 a_AT1 greater_JJR capability_NN1 to_TO monitor_VVI employees_NN2 in_II ways_NN2 that_CST raise_VV0 privacy_NN1 concerns_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS we_PPIS2 assume_VV0 that_CST our_APPGE findings_NN2 in_II a_AT1 borough_NN1 including_II four_MC beats_NN2 can_VM be_VBI extrapolated_VVN to_II urban_JJ areas_NN2 more_RGR generally_RR ,_, large_JJ crime-prevention_JJ gains_NN2 would_VM be_VBI expected_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Of_IO those_DD2 ,_, 242_MC service_NN1 users_NN2 attended_VVD an_AT1 end_NN1 of_IO therapy_NN1 assessment_NN1 ,_, of_IO whom_PNQO 165_MC (_( 68%_NNU )_) completed_VVD the_AT STQ_NP1 (_( Beck_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1993_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Measurement_NN1 issues_NN2 could_VM also_RR help_VVI explain_VVI the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 clear_JJ longitudinal_JJ connection_NN1 between_II prosocial_JJ behaviour_NN1 and_CC mutual_JJ friendship_NN1 (_( and_CC ,_, for_IF that_DD1 matter_NN1 ,_, the_AT lack_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 significant_JJ contemporaneous_JJ correlation_NN1 at_II age_NN1 5_MC between_II prosocial_JJ behaviour_NN1 and_CC ToM_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, applying_VVG GRADE_NN1 criteria_NN2 to_II observational_JJ studies_NN2 generated_VVD low_JJ quality_NN1 evidence_NN1 with_IW moderate_JJ risk_NN1 of_IO bias_NN1 in_II31 favour_II32 of_II33 reducing_VVG mortality_NN1 in_II SAM_NP1 children_NN2 following_VVG WHO_NP1 guideline_NN1 (_( Appendix_NN1 SIV_NN1 ,_, Supporting_JJ Information_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, a_AT1 moderator_NN1 analysis_NN1 using_VVG no-intercept_VV0 values_NN2 was_VBDZ performed_VVN in_II the_AT R_NP1 metafor_NN1 package_NN1 for_IF participant_NN1 gender_NN1 ,_, client_NN1 intervention_NN1 site_NN1 location_NN1 ,_, primary_JJ diagnostic_JJ category_NN1 of_IO participants_NN2 ,_, and_CC research_NN1 design_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 section_NN1 we_PPIS2 show_VV0 how_RRQ to_TO use_VVI the_AT high-quality_JJ panel_NN1 data_NN on_II repeated_JJ effort_NN1 choices_NN2 from_II the_AT slider_NN1 task_NN1 to_TO estimate_VVI the_AT cost_NN1 of_IO effort_NN1 at_II the_AT subject_NN1 level_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS a_AT1 drug_NN1 of_IO abuse_NN1 and/or_CC its_APPGE metabolites_NN2 and/or_CC other_JJ exogenous_JJ compounds_NN2 are_VBR detected_VVN ,_, a_AT1 further_JJR GC/MS_NN1 analysis_NN1 is_VBZ performed_VVN to_II quantitative_JJ them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Blurring_VVG one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 own_VV0 perspective_NN1 with_IW another_DD1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 will_VM lower_VVI empathic_JJ accuracy_NN1 and_CC could_VM increase_VVI personal_JJ distress_NN1 and/or_CC emotional_JJ disengagement_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF each_DD1 emotion_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 proportion_NN1 score_NN1 is_VBZ calculated_VVN by_II summing_VVG the_AT scores_NN2 for_IF all_DB ten_MC vignettes_NN2 and_CC dividing_VVG it_PPH1 by_II the_AT sum_NN1 of_IO all_DB the_AT emotion_NN1 scores_NN2 combined_VVD ._. 
</s>
<s>
Multivariate_JJ pattern_NN1 analysis_NN1 also_RR allows_VVZ for_IF a_AT1 generalization_NN1 step_NN1 to_TO add_VVI rigor_NN1 to_II the_AT conventional_JJ general_JJ linear_JJ model_NN1 analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cynical_JJ individuals_NN2 were_VBDR also_RR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO report_VVI worse_JJR subjective_JJ health_NN1 status_NN1 &lsqb;_( r_ZZ1 =_FO .189_MC ,_, p<<_FO .001_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO (_( 0.20_MC ,_, 0.17_MC )_) and_CC r_ZZ1 =_FO .196_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 <_FO .001_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO (_( 0.21_MC ,_, 0.18_MC )_) ,_, at_II t1_FO and_CC t2_FO ,_, respectively_RR &rsqb;_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT opinions_NN2 expressed_VVN in_II this_DD1 publication_NN1 are_VBR those_DD2 of_IO the_AT author_NN1 and_CC do_VD0 not_XX necessarily_RR reflect_VVI the_AT views_NN2 of_IO the_AT Fuller_NP1 Thrive_VV0 Center_NN1 or_CC the_AT John_NP1 Templeton_NP1 Foundation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
But_CCB this_DD1 is_VBZ really_RR only_RR the_AT tip_NN1 of_IO the_AT iceberg_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Both_RR distal_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, demographics_NN2 ,_, personality_NN1 ,_, trauma_NN1 history_NN1 )_) and_CC proximal_JJ (_( e.g._REX ,_, recent_JJ life_NN1 events_NN2 ,_, moods_NN2 )_) factors_NN2 contribute_VV0 to_II suicidal_JJ thoughts_NN2 and_CC attempts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO do_VDI so_RG effectively_RR will_VM require_VVI both_DB2 negotiation_NN1 skills_NN2 and_CC a_AT1 moral_JJ philosophy_NN1 that_CST serves_VVZ as_II a_AT1 personal_JJ source_NN1 of_IO strength_NN1 and_CC guidance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 interface_VV0 with_IW grid_NN1 cells_NN2 and_CC place_VV0 cells_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Moser_NP1 ,_, Kropff_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Moser_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) to_TO form_VVI an_AT1 integrated_JJ system_NN1 supporting_JJ navigation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Just_RR because_CS parenting_NN1 and_CC peer_VV0 delinquency_NN1 are_VBR measured_VVN antecedent_JJ to_II offending_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX mean_VVI that_DD1 prior_JJ offending_NN1 can_VM be_VBI eliminated_VVN as_II a_AT1 possible_JJ cause_NN1 of_IO both_RR parenting_VVG and_CC peers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB in_II all_DB ,_, our_APPGE study_NN1 shows_VVZ that_DD1 childhood_NN1 trauma_NN1 and_CC adult_NN1 experiences_NN2 in_II psychosis_NN1 are_VBR related_VVN ,_, likely_JJ by_II31 means_II32 of_II33 both_DB2 selection_NN1 of_IO the_AT environment_NN1 by_II traits_NN2 of_IO the_AT individual_NN1 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT propensity_NN1 for_IF childhood_NN1 trauma_NN1 in_II further_JJR shaping_JJ personality_NN1 and_CC functional_JJ outcome_NN1 ,_, in_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, increasing_VVG the_AT chances_NN2 of_IO re-victimisation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Table_NN1 4_MC shows_VVZ the_AT fit_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 model_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE explained_JJ variance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT fully-adjusted_JJ model_NN1 ,_, Cox_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 proportional_JJ hazards_NN2 analysis_NN1 did_VDD not_XX show_VVI a_AT1 statistically_RR significant_JJ overall_JJ association_NN1 between_II informal_JJ caregiving_NN1 and_CC all-cause_JJ mortality_NN1 for_IF combined_JJ sexes_NN2 (_( HR_NNU 0.97_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO 0.79_MC ,_, 1.19_MC )_) ,_, men_NN2 (_( HR_NNU 0.98_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO 0.76_MC ,_, 1.27_MC )_) ,_, or_CC women_NN2 (_( HR_NNU 0.95_MC ,_, 95%_NNU CI_FO 0.68_MC ,_, 1.34_MC )_) ,_, either_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Children_NN2 were_VBDR taken_VVN through_II a_AT1 practice_NN1 block_NN1 of_IO 36_MC trials_NN2 that_CST included_VVD 6_MC No-Go_JJ targets_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Murdock_NP1 and_CC Bolch_VV0 2005_MC ;_; Poteat_NP1 and_CC Espelage_NP1 2007_MC ;_; Russell_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT evidence_NN1 emerged_VVD that_CST this_DD1 presented_VVD a_AT1 problem_NN1 in_II this_DD1 study_NN1 ,_, possibly_RR because_CS all_DB respondents_NN2 were_VBDR aware_JJ that_CST their_APPGE answers_NN2 were_VBDR anonymous_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 are_VBR again_RT consistent_JJ with_IW Combination_NN1 Theory_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT MIBS-J-7_MC was_VBDZ assigned_VVN an_AT1 '_NULL insufficient_JJ '_NULL rating_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT remaining_JJ measures_NN2 were_VBDR assigned_VVN '_NULL indeterminate_JJ '_NULL ratings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO liquor_NN1 stores_NN2 ,_, the_AT higher_JJR robbery_NN1 risk_NN1 on_II weekdays_NNT2 was_VBDZ already_RR present_JJ by_II 8_MC pm_RA ,_, which_DDQ likely_JJ highlights_NN2 that_CST this_DD1 is_VBZ due_RR less_RRR to_II inebriated_JJ patrons_NN2 (_( given_VVN the_AT lack_NN1 of_IO onsite_NN1 consumption_NN1 )_) but_CCB rather_RR due_II21 to_II22 the_AT increased_JJ presence_NN1 of_IO targets_NN2 and_CC offenders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
EEG_VV0 epochs_NN2 from_II 100_MC ms_NN1 pre-stimulus_NN1 to_II 500_MC ms_NN1 post-stimulus_NN1 onset_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, 102_MC data_NN points_NN2 before_II and_CC 512_MC data_NN points_NN2 after_II stimulus_NN1 onset_NN1 )_) were_VBDR extracted_VVN from_II the_AT raw_JJ EEG_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Among_II the_AT 236_MC children_NN2 in_II Early_JJ STOPP_NN1 ,_, 145_MC were_VBDR included_VVN in_II the_AT present_JJ analysis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX are_VBR many_DA2 ways_NN2 in_II which_DDQ electronic_JJ transmission_NN1 of_IO data_NN can_VM be_VBI intercepted_VVN by_II third_MD parties_NN2 ,_, without_IW consent_NN1 by_II the_AT user_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Note_VV0 that_CST the_AT experimenter_NN1 was_VBDZ not_XX aware_JJ of_IO the_AT nature_NN1 (_( compatible_JJ vs._II incompatible_JJ )_) of_IO the_AT trials_NN2 during_II the_AT marking_NN1 procedure_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 respect_NN1 ,_, the_AT consistency_NN1 of_IO support_NN1 for_IF the_AT circular_JJ model_NN1 across_II all_DB seven_MC studies_NN2 is_VBZ more_RGR noteworthy_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, they_PPHS2 conclude_VV0 that_CST IATs_VVZ in_II which_DDQ relevant_JJ background_NN1 pictures_NN2 are_VBR used_VVN are_VBR more_RGR suitable_JJ for_IF the_AT assessment_NN1 of_IO traits_NN2 ,_, while_CS decontextualized_JJ IAT_NN1 versions_NN2 might_VM be_VBI more_RGR appropriate_JJ for_IF measuring_VVG states_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Urban_JJ and_CC Scasny_NP1 (_( 2012_MC )_) showed_VVD that_CST environmental_JJ concern_NN1 influenced_VVN both_RR curtailment_NN1 and_CC efficiency_NN1 actions_NN2 ;_; nevertheless_RR ,_, sociodemographic_JJ differences_NN2 emerged_VVD about_II who_PNQS did_VDD what_DDQ ._. 
</s>
<s>
RDoC_NN1 takes_VVZ a_AT1 translational_JJ ,_, dimensional_JJ approach_NN1 to_II defining_VVG psychopathology_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 has_VHZ important_JJ implications_NN2 for_IF close_JJ developmental_JJ surveillance_NN1 ,_, and_CC perhaps_RR enrollment_NN1 in_II preventive_JJ programs_NN2 ,_, for_IF socioeconomically_RR disadvantaged_JJ children_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS this_DD1 suggest_VV0 a_AT1 strong_JJ genetic_JJ contribution_NN1 in_II the_AT parental_JJ influences_NN2 on_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reading_NN1 ,_, parents_NN2 also_RR influence_VV0 their_APPGE children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reading_VVG skills_NN2 through_II the_AT environment_NN1 they_PPHS2 provide_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Internet_NN1 protocol_NN1 (_( IP_NP1 )_) addresses_NN2 were_VBDR checked_VVN ,_, and_CC no_AT IP_NN1 corresponded_VVN to_II more_DAR than_CSN one_MC1 questionnaire_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 48_MC hours_NNT2 later_RRR ,_, they_PPHS2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO recall_VVI the_AT first_MD set_NN1 of_IO objects_NN2 only_RR ,_, that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, the_AT objects_NN2 they_PPHS2 learned_VVD during_II the_AT first_MD session_NNT1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Through_II utilizing_VVG body_NN1 ,_, head_NN1 ,_, and_CC limbs_NN2 ,_, apes_NN2 produce_VV0 intentional_JJ ,_, flexibly_RR used_VVN ,_, and_CC "_" meaningful_JJ "_" signals_NN2 to_TO communicate_VVI with_IW others_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Bard_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Call_VV0 &;_NULL Tomasello_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Hobaiter_NP1 &;_NULL Byrne_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Roberts_NP1 ,_, Vick_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Buchanan-Smith_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS we_PPIS2 can_VM not_XX offer_VVI him_PPHO1 everything_PN1 which_DDQ he_PPHS1 as_II a_AT1 child_NN1 should_VM have_VHI had_VHN ,_, the_AT mere_JJ fact_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 can_VM be_VBI helpful_JJ to_II him_PPHO1 gives_VVZ the_AT necessary_JJ impetus_NN1 towards_II a_AT1 new_JJ life_NN1 "_" (_( Ferenczi_NP1 ,_, 1931a_FO ,_, p._NN1 238_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT maldistribution_NN1 of_IO HPs_NN2 across_II Australia_NP1 and_CC the_AT high_JJ costs_NN2 associated_VVN with_IW their_APPGE low_JJ retention_NN1 rates_NN2 in_II VRI_JJ communities_NN2 underpinned_VVD the_AT study_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Perceived_JJ helpfulness_NN1 of_IO depression_NN1 care_NN1 was_VBDZ defined_VVN as_CSA reporting_VVG that_DD1 treatment_NN1 or_CC counseling_NN1 helped_VVD "_" a_AT1 lot_NN1 "_" or_CC was_VBDZ "_" extremely_RR "_" helpful_JJ (_( Mojtabai_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Input_NN1 bias_NN1 Ib_NP1 and_CC Tb_NN1 parameters_NN2 are_VBR constrained_VVN to_II the_AT value_NN1 one_MC1 at_II the_AT trial-relevant_JJ task_NN1 unit_NN1 and_CC the_AT trial-relevant_JJ input_NN1 units_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT analytical_JJ concerns_NN2 driving_VVG the_AT study_NN1 were_VBDR who_PNQS started_VVN ,_, how_RRQ they_PPHS2 started_VVD ,_, and_CC how_RRQ children_NN2 dealt_VVN with_IW differential_JJ access_NN1 to_II information_NN1 and_CC the_AT identification_NN1 of_IO phases_NN2 within_II the_AT opening_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Studies_NN2 like_II Scherag_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2004_MC )_) and_CC Grüter_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2012_MC )_) show_VV0 that_CST L2_FO speakers_NN2 are_VBR not_XX incapable_JJ of_IO predicting_VVG altogether_RR ,_, but_CCB suggest_VV0 that_CST semantic_JJ cues_NN2 may_VM be_VBI more_RGR accessible_JJ for_IF predictive_JJ processing_NN1 than_CSN morphosyntactic_JJ cues_NN2 (_( see_VV0 also_RR Hopp_VV0 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Mitsugi_NP1 &;_NULL MacWhinney_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 excluded_VVD all_DB review_VV0 articles_NN2 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT studies_NN2 evaluating_VVG olfaction_NN1 or_CC taste_NN1 in_II samples_NN2 of_IO patients_NN2 with_IW either_RR affective_JJ or_CC psychotic_JJ disorder_NN1 ,_, but_CCB not_XX having_VHG any_DD BPD_NP1 patients_NN2 in_II the_AT sample_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 main_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO age_NN1 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 repeated-letter_JJ trigrams_NNU2 were_VBDR less_RGR common_JJ in_II older_JJR prephonological_JJ spellers_NN2 than_CSN in_II younger_JJR ones_NN2 (_( b=1.35_FO ,_, SE=0.39_FO ,_, p<.001_FO )_) ,_, and_CC a_AT1 main_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO order_NN1 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 repeated-letter_JJ trigrams_NNU2 were_VBDR significantly_RR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO occur_VVI later_RRR in_II a_AT1 session_NNT1 than_CSN earlier_JJR in_II a_AT1 session_NNT1 (_( b=2.58_FO ,_, SE=0.47_FO ,_, p<.001_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
By_II contrast_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 would_VM expect_VVI the_AT perceived_JJ benefits_NN2 to_TO vary_VVI in_II the_AT opposite_JJ direction_NN1 ,_, being_VBG lowest_JJT in_II the_AT negative_JJ information_NN1 group_NN1 and_CC highest_JJT in_II the_AT positive_JJ information_NN1 group_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 Japanese_JJ version_NN1 of_IO the_AT DISC-C_NP1 was_VBDZ developed_VVN using_VVG the_AT translation_NN1 and_CC back_NN1 translation_NN1 method_NN1 ,_, and_CC has_VHZ been_VBN applied_VVN in_II previous_JJ studies_NN2 conducted_VVN in_II Japan_NP1 (_( Nishida_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Nishida_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Nishida_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Oshima_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC ;_; Watanabe_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
No_AT test_NN1 ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST the_AT availability_NN1 of_IO object_NN1 details_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX sufficient_JJ to_TO support_VVI a_AT1 recall-to-reject_JJ strategy_NN1 ,_, likely_JJ because_II21 of_II22 the_AT additional_JJ demands_NN2 this_DD1 test_NN1 places_NN2 on_II the_AT ability_NN1 to_TO strategically_RR retrieve_VVI ,_, maintain_VVI ,_, and_CC evaluate_VVI stored_JJ details_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
MRI_JJ scans_NN2 were_VBDR collected_VVN on_II a_AT1 3.0T_FO Skyra_NP1 Magnetom_NP1 scanner_NN1 (_( Siemens_NP1 )_) at_II the_AT Kessler_NP1 Foundation_NN1 Rocco_NP1 Ortenzio_NP1 Neuroimaging_NP1 Center_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ problematic_JJ because_CS conservation_NN1 of_IO resources_NN2 theory_NN1 (_( COR_UH )_) suggests_VVZ that_CST perceived_VVD mistrust_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 negative_JJ experience_NN1 likely_JJ to_TO affect_VVI the_AT mistrusted_JJ employees_NN2 '_NULL subsequent_JJ attitudes_NN2 and_CC behaviors_NN2 both_RR at_II work_NN1 and_CC at_II home_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS there_EX were_VBDR six_MC different_JJ outcome_NN1 variables_NN2 ,_, a_AT1 Bonferroni_JJ adjusted_JJ level_NN1 of_IO 0.008_MC was_VBDZ used_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, although_CS our_APPGE strict_JJ application_NN1 of_IO inclusion_NN1 and_CC exclusion_NN1 criteria_NN2 probably_RR increased_VVD the_AT validity_NN1 of_IO the_AT findings_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR had_VHD to_TO exclude_VVI studies_NN2 with_IW interesting_JJ findings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT probably=possibly_FO efficacious_JJ treatments_NN2 identified_VVN each_DD1 have_VH0 evidence_NN1 from_II only_RR a_AT1 single_JJ randomized_JJ controlled_JJ trial_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, a_AT1 maximum_JJ likelihood_NN1 estimator_NN1 provides_VVZ for_IF less_RGR biased_JJ estimates_NN2 compared_VVN to_II a_AT1 two-stage_NN1 least_DAT squares_NN2 estimator_NN1 (_( Staiger_NP1 &;_NULL Stock_NP1 ,_, 1997_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT randomized_JJ presentation_NN1 requires_VVZ a_AT1 new_JJ action_NN1 plan_NN1 to_TO be_VBI implemented_VVN into_II working_VVG memory_NN1 on_II the_AT subsequent_JJ trial_NN1 ,_, potentially_RR causing_VVG more_DAR interference_NN1 to_II the_AT primary_JJ task_NN1 (_( for_IF a_AT1 review_NN1 of_IO Stroop_NP1 effect_NN1 theory_NN1 ,_, see_VV0 MacLeod_NP1 ,_, 1991_MC ,_, 1992_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Post_JJ21 hoc_JJ22 LSD_NN1 tests_NN2 indicated_VVD that_CST viewing_VVG the_AT major_JJ contradiction_NN1 resulted_VVN in_II higher_JJR guilt_NN1 ratings_NN2 than_CSN all_DB other_JJ conditions_NN2 (_( p_ZZ1 values_NN2 <_FO .01_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, the_AT action_NN1 system_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 recent_JJ history_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, the_AT motor_NN1 memory_NN1 established_VVN by_II the_AT training_NN1 )_) is_VBZ central_JJ to_II this_DD1 effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT converse_JJ view_NN1 is_VBZ that_DD1 internal_JJ representations_NN2 are_VBR no_AT more_DAR than_CSN a_AT1 set_NN1 of_IO propositional_JJ arguments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Initial_JJ values_NN2 for_IF all_DB other_JJ endogenous_JJ variables_NN2 and_CC exogenous_JJ outputs_NN2 in_II the_AT model_NN1 were_VBDR not_XX varied_VVN for_IF these_DD2 scenarios_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additional_JJ analyses_NN2 revealed_VVD that_CST full_JJ RSA_NP1 (_( i.e._REX a_AT1 combination_NN1 of_IO positive_JJ feedback_NN1 and_CC self-affirmation_NN1 )_) was_VBDZ more_RGR effective_JJ in_II reducing_VVG the_AT misinformation_NN1 effect_NN1 than_CSN self-affirmation_JJ alone_JJ (_( F&lsqb;1,302&rsqb;_FO =_FO 11.04_MC ;_; p_ZZ1 =_FO .001_MC ;_; h2_FO p_ZZ1 =_FO .04_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO examine_VVI whether_CSW there_EX were_VBDR any_DD significant_JJ mean_JJ differences_NN2 among_II the_AT four_MC waves_NN2 of_IO CPS_NP1 total_JJ scores_NN2 and_CC to_TO examine_VVI whether_CSW there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 significant_JJ interaction_NN1 between_II wave_NN1 and_CC sex_NN1 ,_, a_AT1 multilevel_NN1 analysis_NN1 of_IO variance_NN1 (_( ANOVA_NP1 )_) was_VBDZ conducted_VVN using_VVG PROC_NP1 MIXED_VVD in_II SAS_NP1 statistical_JJ software_NN1 (_( SAS_NP1 Institute_NN1 ,_, 2005_MC ;_; ddfm_NNU =_FO satterth_NN1 was_VBDZ used_VVN in_II calculating_VVG the_AT degrees_NN2 of_IO freedom_NN1 )_) to_TO account_VVI for_IF the_AT dependence_NN1 between_II two_MC twins_NN2 in_II a_AT1 pair_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 post-hoc_JJ inspection_NN1 of_IO the_AT data_NN revealed_VVD the_AT main_JJ reason_NN1 why_RRQ negative_JJ values_NN2 occurred_VVD for_IF Openness_NN1 and_CC especially_RR Agreeableness_NP1 :_: For_IF both_DB2 domains_NN2 ,_, their_APPGE GCE_NN1 was_VBDZ much_RR smaller_JJR than_CSN their_APPGE CE_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_IW overall_JJ mental_JJ health_NN1 service_NN1 utilization_NN1 still_RR below_RG 50%_NNU ,_, those_DD2 with_IW a_AT1 disorder_NN1 ,_, racial/ethnic_JJ minority_NN1 ,_, low_JJ SES_NP2 ,_, and_CC rural_JJ populations_NN2 receive_VV0 services_NN2 at_II even_RR lower_JJR rates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 was_VBDZ not_XX due_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 difference_NN1 in_II the_AT strength_NN1 of_IO priming_VVG between_II the_AT Pseudodyad_NP1 and_CC Single_JJ conditions_NN2 (_( stronger_JJR priming_NN1 from_II the_AT computer_NN1 would_VM in_II fact_NN1 act_NN1 against_II regularisation_NN1 )_) ,_, since_CS structural_JJ priming_NN1 was_VBDZ equivalent_JJ across_II those_DD2 conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, throughout_II the_AT task_NN1 ,_, the_AT experimenter_NN1 interacted_VVN with_IW the_AT infant_NN1 (_( by_II smiling_VVG and_CC presenting_VVG the_AT object_NN1 )_) in_II such_DA a_AT1 way_NN1 that_CST the_AT task_NN1 was_VBDZ inherently_RR a_AT1 social_JJ situation_NN1 ,_, including_II emotional_JJ features_NN2 likely_JJ to_TO involve_VVI the_AT right_JJ hemisphere_NN1 (_( Balaban_NP1 ,_, Anderson_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Wisniewsky_NP1 ,_, 1998_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Haloperidol_VV0 ,_, risperidone_VV0 ,_, quetiapine_VV0 ,_, olanzapine_VV0 ,_, and_CC aripiprazole_NN1 have_VH0 each_DD1 been_VBN associated_VVN with_IW at_RR21 least_RR22 one_MC1 positive_JJ result_NN1 from_II a_AT1 randomized_JJ placebo-controlled_JJ trial_NN1 (_( Fineberg_NP1 &;_NULL Brown._NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, although_CS scalp_NN1 potentials_NN2 recorded_VVN over_II ipsi_NN2 M1_FO show_VV0 a_AT1 sensitivity_NN1 to_II the_AT probability_NN1 bias_NN1 (_( Fig._NN1 6A_FO ,_, down_RP )_) ,_, scalp_NN1 potentials_NN2 recorded_VVN over_II contra_NN1 M1_FO (_( Fig._NN1 6A_FO up_II )_) also_RR do_VD0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II supine_JJ to_II HUT_NN1 ,_, CrCP_NP1 variation_NN1 decreased_VVN (_( both_DB2 maximal_JJ and_CC stable_JJ phase_NN1 p_ZZ1 =_FO 0.001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO draw_VVI the_AT grid_NN1 ,_, the_AT experimenter_NN1 drew_VVD a_AT1 straight_JJ line_NN1 from_II the_AT center_NN1 of_IO the_AT wrist_NN1 passing_VVG through_II the_AT forearm_NN1 center_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II the_AT contrary_NN1 :_: he_PPHS1 sees_VVZ it_PPH1 as_II a_AT1 creative_JJ and_CC curative_JJ statute_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 can_VM prevent_VVI children_NN2 from_II pursuing_VVG situations_NN2 where_RRQ they_PPHS2 can_VM make_VVI mistakes_NN2 and_CC use_VVI problem-solving_NN1 skills_NN2 to_TO correct_VVI them_PPHO2 (_( Cooklin_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Feng_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; LeMoyne_NP1 and_CC Buchanan_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 action_NN1 characteristics_NN2 had_VHD to_TO be_VBI fulfilled_VVN in_BCL21 order_BCL22 for_IF the_AT action_NN1 to_TO be_VBI classified_VVN as_CSA correct_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN found_VVN to_TO be_VBI compatible_JJ with_IW Turkey_NP1 average_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II our_APPGE research_NN1 ,_, the_AT product_NN1 and_CC contexts_NN2 we_PPIS2 chose_VVD needed_VVN to_TO believably_RR be_VBI energizing_VVG or_CC relaxing_JJ in_BCL21 order_BCL22 to_TO test_VVI whether_CSW diagonals_NN2 can_VM convey_VVI activity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Despite_II the_AT growing_JJ use_NN1 of_IO and_CC support_VV0 for_IF VCT_NP1 ,_, along_II21 with_II22 other_JJ forms_NN2 of_IO remote_JJ mental_JJ health_NN1 care_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, online_RR support_VV0 groups_NN2 ,_, mobile_JJ apps_NN2 )_) ,_, there_EX remains_VVZ comparatively_RR little_RR empirical_JJ evidence_NN1 on_II its_APPGE effectiveness_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS one_PN1 accepts_VVZ that_CST legitimizing_JJ inequality_NN1 is_VBZ theoretically_RR distinct_JJ from_II legitimation_NN1 of_IO the_AT status_NN121 quo_NN122 ,_, and_CC that_DD1 legitimation_NN1 can_VM involve_VVI more_DAR than_CSN justice_NN1 perceptions_NN2 ,_, then_RT it_PPH1 becomes_VVZ possible_JJ to_TO conceive_VVI of_IO ways_NN2 that_CST systems_NN2 can_VM be_VBI bolstered_VVN without_IW making_VVG inequality_NN1 seem_VVI fair_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Given_CS21 that_CS22 only_RR some_DD digital_JJ trainings_NN2 of_IO EF_NP1 are_VBR effective_JJ while_CS others_NN2 are_VBR not_XX ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ of_IO both_DB2 practical_JJ and_CC theoretical_JJ importance_NN1 to_TO identify_VVI the_AT specific_JJ features_NN2 that_CST can_VM make_VVI digital_JJ games_NN2 effective_JJ tools_NN2 for_IF learning_VVG and_CC cognitive_JJ skills_NN2 training_NN1 (_( Plass_NP1 ,_, Homer_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Kinzer_NP1 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
From_II a_AT1 more_RGR theoretical_JJ perspective_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, objections_NN2 to_II this_DD1 point_NN1 of_IO view_NN1 are_VBR possible_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Likewise_RR ,_, demographic_JJ segmentation_NN1 can_VM provide_VVI observable_JJ differences_NN2 between_II segments_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, age_NN1 and_CC income_NN1 )_) ,_, but_CCB it_PPH1 does_VDZ little_DA1 to_TO provide_VVI insight_NN1 into_II a_AT1 segment_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 interests_NN2 or_CC behaviour_NN1 (_( Kotler_NP1 ,_, 1980_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Research_NN1 has_VHZ shown_VVN that_CST relying_VVG on_II intuition_NN1 can_VM yield_VVI more_RGR advantageous_JJ judgments_NN2 and_CC decisions_NN2 than_CSN relying_VVG on_II reasons_NN2 and_CC an_AT1 extensive_JJ deliberation_NN1 about_II pros_NN2 and_CC cons_NN2 ,_, at_RR21 least_RR22 in_II some_DD domains_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, Dijkstra_NP1 ,_, Van_NP1 der_NP1 Pligt_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Van_NP1 Kleef_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Dijkstra_NP1 ,_, Van_NP1 der_NP1 Pligt_NP1 ,_, Van_NP1 Kleef_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Kertsholt_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Halberstadt_NP1 &;_NULL Green_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Wilson_NP1 &;_NULL Schooler_NP1 ,_, 1991_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Poor_JJ sleep_NN1 has_VHZ consistently_RR been_VBN associated_VVN with_IW child_NN1 obesity_NN1 and_CC has_VHZ been_VBN suggested_VVN as_II an_AT1 obesityrelated_JJ behaviour_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Unexpectedly_RR ,_, and_CC surprising_JJ in_II31 light_II32 of_II33 the_AT results_NN2 for_IF our_APPGE objective_JJ measure_NN1 TBR_NP1 ,_, self-reported_JJ attentional_JJ control_NN1 as_CSA measured_VVN with_IW ACS_NN2 was_VBDZ not_XX related_VVN to_II attentional_JJ bias_NN1 in_II any_DD way_NN1 (_( c.f._VV0 ,_, Reinholdt-Dunne_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, given_VVN its_APPGE broad_JJ definition_NN1 ,_, different_JJ conceptualisations_NN2 of_IO the_AT same_DA motive_NN1 have_VH0 shown_VVN diverging_JJ associations_NN2 (_( e.g._REX Engeser_JJR &;_NULL Langens_NN2 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT dual_JJ correlation_NN1 of_IO TWA_NN1 to_II PNS_NP1 decreases_VVZ and_CC SNS_NN2 increases_NN2 could_VM simply_RR be_VBI explained_VVN by_II their_APPGE profound_JJ reduction_NN1 of_IO the_AT IBI_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ may_VM itself_PPX1 be_VBI the_AT primary_JJ driver_NN1 of_IO TWA_NP1 decreases_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 association_NN1 exists_VVZ in_II one-year_JJ old_JJ infants_NN2 ,_, who_PNQS associate_VV0 higher_JJR and_CC low_JJ pitches_NN2 with_IW up_II and_CC down_JJ arrows_NN2 ,_, respectively_RR ,_, in_II a_AT1 selective-looking_JJ task_NN1 (_( Wagner_NP1 ,_, Winner_NN1 ,_, Cicchetti_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Gardner_NP1 ,_, 1981_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hellerstedt_NP1 &;_NULL Johansson_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Spitzer_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Mothers_NN2 experiencing_VVG depressive_NN1 symptoms_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN shown_VVN to_TO adjust_VVI more_RGR slowly_RR and_CC less_RGR consistently_RR (_( Zlochower_NP1 &;_NULL Cohn_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC )_) ,_, provide_VV0 less_RGR contingent_JJ responses_NN2 (_( Field_NP1 ,_, Healy_NP1 ,_, Goldstein_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Guthertz_NP1 ,_, 1990_MC )_) ,_, and_CC be_VBI less_RGR synchronous_JJ in_II normal_JJ interactions_NN2 with_IW their_APPGE infants_NN2 (_( Moore_NP1 &;_NULL Calkins_NP1 ,_, 2004_MC )_) compared_VVN to_II non-depressed_JJ mothers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT target_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 status_NN1 and_CC traits_NN2 are_VBR both_RR important_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, research_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST individual_JJ differences_NN2 in_II ideology_NN1 map_NN1 onto_II at_RR21 least_RR22 two_MC dimensions_NN2 (_( e.g._REX Crawford_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Duckitt_NP1 &;_NULL Sibley_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Jost_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Kandler_NP1 ,_, Bleidorn_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Riemann_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Kay_NP1 &;_NULL Brandt_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; Malka_NP1 ,_, Soto_NP1 ,_, Inzlicht_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lelkes_NP2 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Stangor_NP1 &;_NULL Leary_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) :_: the_AT resistance_NN1 to_II social_JJ change_NN1 and_CC the_AT acceptance_NN1 of_IO inequality_NN1 (_( Jost_NP1 ,_, Glaser_NP1 ,_, Kruglanski_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Sulloway_NP1 ,_, 2003b_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF this_DD1 reason_NN1 ,_, "_" the_AT NCVS_NP1 is_VBZ considered_VVN the_AT most_RGT accurate_JJ source_NN1 of_IO information_NN1 on_II the_AT true_JJ volume_NN1 and_CC characteristics_NN2 of_IO crime_NN1 and_CC victimization_NN1 in_II the_AT United_NP1 States_NP1 "_" (_( Gutierrez_NP1 and_CC Kirk_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC :_: 932_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, on_II computer_NN1 participants_NN2 were_VBDR presented_VVN with_IW a_AT1 math_NN1 operation_NN1 (_( e.g._REX ,_, (_( 4_MC ×_II 1_MC1 )_) +_FO 2_MC =_FO ?_? )_) in_II which_DDQ they_PPHS2 had_VHD to_TO click_VVI the_AT mouse_NN1 to_TO indicate_VVI that_CST they_PPHS2 had_VHD solved_VVN the_AT problem_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 means_VVZ that_CST participants_NN2 can_VM not_XX form_VVI a_AT1 TTC_NP1 estimate_NN1 at_II occlusion_NN1 onset_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 general_RR22 ,_, we_PPIS2 expect_VV0 individuals_NN2 to_TO favor_VVI passivity_NN1 over_II activity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT language_NN1 condition_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN considered_VVN as_II a_AT1 control_NN1 condition_NN1 and_CC music_NN1 one_MC1 as_II an_AT1 experimental_JJ one_PN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 "_" picture_NN1 in_II the_AT head_NN1 "_" is_VBZ a_AT1 static_JJ ,_, two-dimensional_JJ representation_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 four-dimensional_JJ stimulus_NN1 (_( most_RGT real-world_JJ stimuli_NN2 have_VH0 width_NN1 ,_, length_NN1 ,_, and_CC depth_NN1 ,_, and_CC also_RR change_VV0 over_II time_NNT1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT cubic_JJ equation_NN1 also_RR made_VVN a_AT1 significant_JJ contribution_NN1 to_II the_AT regression_NN1 fit_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Maximum_JJ likelihood_NN1 estimation_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 correction_NN1 for_IF non-normality_NN1 was_VBDZ used_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT majority_NN1 of_IO participants_NN2 (_( 69.0%_FO )_) were_VBDR in_II employment_NN1 and_CC they_PPHS2 had_VHD diverse_JJ educational_JJ backgrounds_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, if_CS we_PPIS2 take_VV0 the_AT task_NN1 of_IO riding_VVG a_AT1 bicycle_NN1 ,_, in_II supervised_VVD learning_VVG the_AT supervisor_NN1 might_VM signal_VVI the_AT desired_JJ firing_NN1 of_IO the_AT neurons_NN2 that_CST control_VV0 deviation_NN1 of_IO the_AT bike_NN1 from_II vertical_JJ ,_, at_II every_AT1 moment_NN1 in_II time_NNT1 ,_, whereas_CS in_II reinforcement_NN1 learning_VVG the_AT feedback_NN1 might_VM only_RR signal_VVI failure_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, it_PPH1 hurts_VVZ when_RRQ you_PPY fall_VV0 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Accordingly_RR ,_, a_AT1 positive_JJ redefinition_NN1 should_VM not_XX undermine_VVI collective_JJ action_NN1 ,_, but_CCB might_VM even_RR increase_VVI the_AT motivation_NN1 to_TO fight_VVI against_II inequality_NN1 among_II disadvantaged_JJ groups_NN2 and_CC should_VM ,_, therefore_RR ,_, not_XX undermine_VV0 protest_NN1 intentions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Taking_VVG the_AT complexity_NN1 approach_NN1 involves_VVZ abandoning_VVG the_AT very_JJ idea_NN1 of_IO "_" natural_JJ law_NN1 "_" and_CC mechanism_NN1 ,_, of_IO proportionality_NN1 between_II cause_NN1 and_CC effect_NN1 ,_, and_CC that_CST the_AT dynamics_NN of_IO a_AT1 system_NN1 can_VM be_VBI reconstructed_VVN by_II summing_VVG up_RP the_AT effects_NN2 of_IO single_JJ causes_NN2 acting_VVG on_II single_JJ components_NN2 according_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 Cartesian_JJ mechanistic_JJ vision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Demand_VV0 also_RR varied_VVN in_II correspondence_NN1 to_II two_MC well-validated_JJ predictors_NN2 of_IO individual_JJ differences_NN2 in_II smoking_JJ cessation_NN1 among_II pregnant_JJ women_NN2 (_( cigarettes_NN2 smoked_VVN per_II day_NNT1 ,_, pre-pregnancy_JJ quit_JJ attempts_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT conditions_NN2 were_VBDR fully_RR counterbalanced_VVN across_II sentences_NN2 and_CC participants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II such_DA ,_, the_AT self-view_NN1 may_VM often_RR be_VBI threatened_VVN by_II undesirable_JJ interpersonal_JJ feedback_NN1 or_CC disapproving_JJ social_JJ evaluations_NN2 (_( e.g._REX ,_, comments_NN2 from_II peers_NN2 ,_, friends_NN2 ,_, relatives_NN2 ,_, employers_NN2 ,_, acquaintances_NN2 ,_, and_CC even_RR strangers_NN2 )_) ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 "_" favorable_JJ views_NN2 about_II oneself_PNX1 are_VBR questioned_VVN ,_, contradicted_VVD ,_, impugned_VVD ,_, mocked_VVD ,_, challenged_VVD ,_, or_CC otherwise_RR put_VVN in_II jeopardy_NN1 "_" (_( Baumeister_NN1 ,_, Smart_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Boden_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC ,_, p._NN1 8_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 evidence_NN1 suggested_VVD one_MC1 pathway_NN1 which_DDQ may_VM explain_VVI a_AT1 harmful_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II FDI_NP1 and_CC mortality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Humility_NN1 refers_VVZ to_II the_AT predisposition_NN1 of_IO lowering_VVG oneself_PNX1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, there_EX are_VBR numerous_JJ subpopulations_NN2 ,_, both_RR in_II the_AT US_NP1 and_CC around_II the_AT world_NN1 that_CST have_VH0 not_XX been_VBN accounted_VVN for_IF or_CC studied_VVN in_II this_DD1 research_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, comparing_VVG low_JJ earners_NN2 in_II the_AT Earned_JJ Income_NN1 Treatment_NN1 to_II low_JJ winners_NN2 in_II the_AT Lottery_NN1 Treatment_NN1 ,_, the_AT low_JJ earners_NN2 propose_VV0 less_DAR than_CSN 50%_NNU for_IF themselves_PPX2 at_II significantly_RR higher_JJR rates_NN2 than_CSN low_JJ winners_NN2 (_( 47.8%_FO vs_II 17.9%_FO ,_, p=.02_FO )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Discussing_VVG a_AT1 non-shared_JJ past_JJ event_NN1 elaboratively_RR at_II any_DD time_NNT1 point_NN1 (_( before_RT ,_, during_II ,_, or_CC after_CS the_AT event_NN1 )_) decreased_VVD the_AT number_NN1 of_IO inaccurate_JJ statements_NN2 children_NN2 provided_VVN relative_II21 to_II22 the_AT number_NN1 provided_VVN by_II children_NN2 who_PNQS did_VDD not_XX discuss_VVI the_AT event_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT so-called_JJ karmic_JJ religions_NN2 (_( Hinduism_NN1 ,_, Buddhism_NN1 ,_, Jainism_NN1 )_) also_RR reflect_VV0 historical_JJ convergences_NN2 between_II religion_NN1 and_CC public_JJ morality_NN1 ,_, although_CS the_AT precise_JJ psychological_JJ mechanisms_NN2 are_VBR not_XX as_RR21 well_RR22 understood_VVN as_II21 for_II22 the_AT Abrahamic_JJ religions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ the_AT mechanism_NN1 whereby_RRQ people_NN infer_VV0 conclusions_NN2 from_II (_( information_NN1 that_CST they_PPHS2 treat_VV0 as_II )_) relevant_JJ evidence_NN1 for_IF these_DD2 conclusions_NN2 (_( Kruglanski_NP1 et_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 identified_VVD two_MC randomised_JJ controlled_JJ trials_NN2 both_DB2 of_IO which_DDQ demonstrated_VVD favorable_JJ results_NN2 for_IF C_ZZ1 +_FO ECT_NP1 ,_, when_CS compared_VVN to_II ECT_NP1 or_CC clozapine_VV0 monotherapy_NN1 (_( Masoudzadeh_NP1 and_CC Khalilian_JJ ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Petrides_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT absence_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 modulation_NN1 of_IO lexical_JJ pathways_NN2 suggests_VVZ that_CST they_PPHS2 may_VM be_VBI equally_RR engaged_VVN in_II familiar_JJ word_NN1 reading_VVG across_II languages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Bivariate_JJ correlations_NN2 indicated_VVD all_DB religious_JJ context_NN1 variables_NN2 were_VBDR correlated_VVN with_IW Knowledge_NN1 Differentiation_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Table_NN1 4_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO note_VVI that_CST the_AT terminology_NN1 of_IO '_NULL predict_VV0 '_NULL is_VBZ used_VVN in_II a_AT1 statistical_JJ sense_NN1 to_TO indicate_VVI that_CST a_AT1 unidirectional_JJ relationship_NN1 is_VBZ being_VBG proposed_VVN between_II two_MC variables_NN2 ;_; it_PPH1 is_VBZ not_XX intended_VVN to_TO suggest_VVI that_CST one_MC1 variable_NN1 necessarily_RR temporally_RR preceded_VVN or_CC caused_VVD the_AT other_JJ ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ not_XX possible_JJ to_TO adequately_RR test_VVI using_VVG only_RR cross-sectional_JJ data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO attention_NN1 residue_NN1 (_( Leroy_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, if_CS these_DD2 tricks_NN2 are_VBR not_XX explained_VVN ,_, magic_NN1 should_VM diminish_VVI the_AT subsequent_JJ need_NN1 for_IF cognition_NN1 and_CC engagement_NN1 in_II students_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 wished_VVD ,_, first_MD ,_, to_TO investigate_VVI whether_CSW both_RR dorsal_JJ and_CC ventral_JJ attention-motor_NN1 network_NN1 interactions_NN2 explain_VV0 an_AT1 adverse_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO spatial_JJ neglect_NN1 on_II functional_JJ performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT focus_NN1 is_VBZ on_II needs_NN2 ,_, motivations_NN2 ,_, traits_NN2 ,_, and_CC the_AT processing_NN1 of_IO social_JJ stimuli_NN2 taken_VVN as_CSA information_NN1 (_( Rijsman_NP1 &;_NULL Stroebe_NP1 ,_, 1989_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 study_NN1 by_II Chan_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2009_MC )_) challenges_VVZ the_AT idea_NN1 that_CST backward_JJ scanning_NN1 is_VBZ obligatory_JJ in_II such_DA experiments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE study_NN1 also_RR has_VHZ a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO limitations_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 brief_JJ retention_NN1 interval_NN1 may_VM have_VHI reduced_VVN the_AT variability_NN1 in_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 memory_NN1 across_II age_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 are_VBR thus_RR similar_JJ to_II those_DD2 reported_VVN by_II Weinhold_NP1 and_CC Chaloupka_NP1 (_( 2016_MC )_) ,_, which_DDQ suggests_VVZ that_CST there_EX is_VBZ an_AT1 increase_NN1 in_II wellbeing_NN1 from_II quitting_VVG smoking_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, both_DB2 ads_NN2 failed_VVD to_TO increase_VVI viewers_NN2 '_NULL concerns_VVZ about_II FBR_NP1 action_NN1 in_II the_AT case_NN1 of_IO non-compliance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA shown_VVN by_II San_NP1 Martín_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2009_MC )_) for_IF the_AT 1PL-G_JJ model_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, 1PL/Rasch_NP1 model_NN1 extended_VVN with_IW a_AT1 guessing_NN1 parameter_NN1 for_IF each_DD1 item_NN1 )_) ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ sufficient_JJ to_TO fix_VVI the_AT difficulty_NN1 and_CC guessing_VVG parameters_NN2 of_IO one_MC1 item_NN1 to_II known_JJ constants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Blonigen_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2006_MC )_) reported_VVD that_CST the_AT stability_NN1 in_II fearless_JJ dominance_NN1 and_CC impulsive_JJ antisociality_NN1 from_II late_JJ adolescence_NN1 (_( age_NN1 17_MC )_) to_II early_JJ adulthood_NN1 (_( age_NN1 24_MC )_) using_VVG self-reports_NN2 was_VBDZ mainly_RR explained_VVN by_II genetic_JJ factors_NN2 and_CC to_II a_AT1 lesser_JJ extent_NN1 by_II nonshared_JJ environmental_JJ factors_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, as_CSA no_AT intervention_NN1 effect_NN1 was_VBDZ detected_VVN on_II any_DD of_IO the_AT sleep_NN1 or_CC growth_NN1 measures_NN2 at_II 2_MC years_NNT2 of_IO age_NN1 (_( Table_NN1 S1_FO ,_, Supporting_JJ Information_NN1 )_) ,_, the_AT analyses_NN2 in_II the_AT present_JJ study_NN1 were_VBDR based_VVN on_II two_MC groups_NN2 ,_, families_NN2 with_IW normalweight_NN1 parents_NN2 (_( low_JJ obesity_NN1 risk_NN1 group_NN1 ,_, n_ZZ1 =_FO 37_MC )_) and_CC families_NN2 with_IW overweight/obese_JJ parents_NN2 (_( high_JJ obesity_NN1 risk_NN1 group_NN1 ,_, n_ZZ1 =_FO 108_MC )_) ,_, to_TO achieve_VVI the_AT study_NN1 aims_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Though_CS it_PPH1 may_VM seem_VVI less_RGR harmful_JJ to_TO perceive_VVI groups_NN2 as_CSA positive_JJ on_II one_MC1 dimension_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 negative_JJ on_II both_DB2 ,_, regarding_VVG people_NN with_IW envy_NN1 (_( up_RP )_) or_CC scorn_NN1 (_( down_RP )_) is_VBZ detrimental_JJ to_II targets_NN2 ,_, perceivers_NN2 ,_, and_CC relationships_NN2 between_II them_PPHO2 (_( Fiske_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Their_APPGE acquisition_NN1 and_CC modification_NN1 of_IO the_AT Abelam_NN1 system_NN1 probably_RR permitted_VVD Ilahita_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 inhabitants_NN2 to_TO resist_VVI being_VBG driven_VVN out_RP ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 has_VHZ since_RR permitted_VVN both_RR military_JJ and_CC economic_JJ success_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ ,_, however_RR ,_, a_AT1 plausible_JJ alternative_NN1 to_II this_DD1 learning_NN1 history_NN1 heuristic_JJ ,_, namely_REX that_CST teachers_NN2 will_VM teach_VVI what_DDQ they_PPHS2 were_VBDR initially_RR taught-no_JJ matter_NN1 what_DDQ their_APPGE learning_NN1 history_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Modelling_VVG trajectories_NN2 of_IO depressive_NN1 symptoms_NN2 appropriately_RR is_VBZ challenging_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
Examining_VVG differences_NN2 depending_II21 on_II22 the_AT age_NN1 of_IO the_AT participants_NN2 ,_, Tavrow_NP1 ,_, Withers_NP1 ,_, Obbuyi_NP1 ,_, Omollo_NP1 ,_, and_CC Wu_NP1 (_( 2013_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST adolescent_JJ participants_NN2 blamed_VVD the_AT victim_NN1 to_II a_AT1 higher_JJR extent_NN1 than_CSN adults_NN2 did_VDD ,_, and_CC Yarmey_NP1 (_( 1985_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST young_JJ adults_NN2 attributed_VVD more_DAR blame_NN1 to_II a_AT1 victim_NN1 than_CSN older_JJR adults_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, it_PPH1 has_VHZ proved_VVN difficult_JJ for_IF studies_NN2 examining_VVG infants_NN2 learning_VVG other_JJ native_JJ languages_NN2 to_TO replicate_VVI such_DA findings_NN2 at_II the_AT same_DA ages_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Overall_RR ,_, the_AT differences_NN2 in_II error_NN1 rates_NN2 for_IF the_AT valid_JJ and_CC neutral_JJ trials_NN2 compared_VVN to_II the_AT neutral_JJ trials_NN2 were_VBDR larger_JJR in_II the_AT WM_NP1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 results_VVZ in_II the_AT production_NN1 of_IO CVPT_NP1 gesture_NN1 ,_, and_CC also_RR in_II better_JJR encoding_NN1 of_IO the_AT event_NN1 (_( better_RRR focus_VVI on_II goals_NN2 and_CC actions_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Third_MD ,_, structural_JJ factors_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 the_AT organization_NN1 of_IO curricula_NN2 and_CC medical_JJ licensing_NN1 requirements_NN2 have_VH0 changed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR specifically_RR ,_, when_CS only_JJ samples_NN2 with_IW positive_JJ variance_NN1 estimates_NN2 are_VBR considered_VVN ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ well_RR established_VVN that_DD1 Td_NN1 ,_, ML_NNU and_CC W_ZZ1 follow_VV0 2_MC distributions_NN2 with_IW degrees_NN2 of_IO freedom_NN1 equal_JJ to_II m_ZZ1 ,_, the_AT number_NN1 of_IO parameters_NN2 tested_VVN in_II the_AT null_JJ hypothesis_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Furthermore_RR ,_, to_TO examine_VVI the_AT actual_JJ difference_NN1 between_II past-behavior_NN1 and_CC situational_JJ interviews_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 computed_VVD marginal_JJ effects_NN2 to_TO obtain_VVI the_AT predicted_JJ percentage_NN1 of_IO correct_JJ detection_NN1 if_CS all_DB other_JJ variables_NN2 are_VBR held_VVN constant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT goal_NN1 of_IO Study_NN1 2_MC was_VBDZ to_TO examine_VVI whether_CSW attitudes_NN2 about_II public_NN1 versus_II private_JJ giving_NN1 might_VM have_VHI implications_NN2 for_IF modest_JJ behavior_NN1 ,_, as_CSA is_VBZ suggested_VVN by_II evidence_NN1 of_IO links_NN2 between_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 reasoning_NN1 and_CC behavior_NN1 in_II this_DD1 domain_NN1 (_( Fu_NP1 ,_, Evans_NP1 ,_, Wang_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lee_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC ;_; Fu_NP1 ,_, Heyman_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lee_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC ;_; Xu_NP1 ,_, Bao_NP1 ,_, Fu_NP1 ,_, Talwar_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Lee_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO decompose_VVI the_AT interaction_NN1 ,_, differences_NN2 between_II stress_NN1 and_CC age_NN1 groups_NN2 were_VBDR compared_VVN by_II31 means_II32 of_II33 simple_JJ effects_NN2 contrasts_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Since_CS Chinese_JJ characters_NN2 are_VBR written_VVN unspaced_JJ ,_, all_DB characters_NN2 are_VBR designed_VVN to_TO fit_VVI into_II the_AT same_DA rectangular_JJ space_NN1 ,_, and_CC many_DA2 consist_VV0 of_IO multiple_JJ strokes_NN2 leading_VVG to_II high_JJ visual_JJ complexity_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, do_VD0 children_NN2 best_RRT remember_VVI the_AT explanations_NN2 they_PPHS2 prefer_VV0 ,_, or_CC do_VD0 satisfaction_NN1 (_( preference_NN1 )_) and_CC memorability_NN1 substantially_RR differ_VV0 from_II one_PPX121 another_PPX122 ?_? 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 examined_VVD whether_CSW the_AT data_NN set_NN1 showed_VVD evidence_NN1 for_IF small-study_JJ effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Each_DD1 block_NN1 contained_VVD 120_MC trials_NN2 ;_; participants_NN2 completed_VVD a_AT1 total_NN1 of_IO 360_MC trials_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF these_DD2 individuals_NN2 ,_, perceptions_NN2 of_IO explicit_JJ behaviors_NN2 as_RG less_RGR indicative_JJ of_IO infidelity_NN1 were_VBDR associated_VVN only_RR with_IW unrestricted_JJ desire_NN1 (_( p_ZZ1 =_FO .001_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, once_CS subjects_NN2 are_VBR given_VVN the_AT opportunity_NN1 to_TO chat_VVI in_II COMM_NP1 ,_, our_APPGE proxy_NN1 for_IF second_MD order_NN1 beliefs_NN2 has_VHZ a_AT1 strong_JJ impact_NN1 on_II transfers_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
It_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO note_VVI that_CST our_APPGE design_NN1 meant_VVD that_DD1 memory_NN1 for_IF the_AT schema_NN1 (_( rule_NN1 )_) could_VM not_XX help_VVI retrieve_VVI a_AT1 specific_JJ trial_NN1 at_II test_NN1 ,_, in_II that_DD1 knowledge_NN1 of_IO the_AT rule_NN1 would_VM not_XX ,_, on_II its_APPGE own_DA ,_, allow_VV0 one_PN1 to_TO guess_VVI whether_CSW a_AT1 specific_JJ combination_NN1 of_IO exemplars_NN2 had_VHD been_VBN studied_VVN (_( i.e._REX ,_, we_PPIS2 controlled_VVD for_IF a_AT1 "_" generate-and-recognize_VV0 "_" strategy_NN1 )_) ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST the_AT congruency_NN1 advantage_NN1 does_VDZ not_XX arise_VVI from_II retrieval-related_JJ processes_NN2 at_II test_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 analysed_VVD the_AT balance_NN1 scale_NN1 data_NN from_II Van_NP1 der_NP1 Maas_NP1 and_CC Jansen_NP1 (_( 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Preterm_VV0 birth_NN1 (_( PTB_NP1 )_) occurs_VVZ among_II 1:11_MC U.S._NP1 white_JJ women_NN2 and_CC 1:7.5_MC African_JJ American_JJ women_NN2 and_CC is_VBZ a_AT1 significant_JJ driver_NN1 of_IO racial_JJ disparities_NN2 in_II infant_NN1 mortality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Therefore_RR ,_, this_DD1 algorithm_NN1 will_VM converge_VVI to_II a_AT1 solution_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 expect_VV0 to_TO hopefully_RR learn_VVI not_XX only_RR more_DAR knowledge_NN1 related_VVN to_II Indigenous_JJ and_CC crosscultural_JJ studies_NN2 ,_, but_CCB to_TO also_RR learn_VVI how_RRQ to_TO apply_VVI this_DD1 knowledge_NN1 in_II a_AT1 practical_JJ setting_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 could_VM translate_VVI the_AT greater_JJR importance_NN1 given_VVN to_II health_NN1 by_II educated_JJ HH_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 was_VBDZ confirmed_VVN for_IF the_AT students_NN2 of_IO both_DB2 conditions_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Despite_II much_DA1 research_NN1 into_II children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 ability_NN1 to_TO report_VVI information_NN1 from_II an_AT1 individual_JJ episode_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 repeated_JJ event_NN1 ,_, their_APPGE capacity_NN1 to_TO identify_VVI well-remembered_JJ episodes_NN2 is_VBZ unknown_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Through_II this_DD1 understanding_NN1 ,_, the_AT client_NN1 should_VM not_XX excuse_VVI ,_, condone_VV0 ,_, dismiss_VV0 ,_, forget_VV0 ,_, or_CC deny_VV0 the_AT offense_NN1 perpetrated_VVD on_II them_PPHO2 but_CCB can_VM instead_RR extend_VVI compassion_NN1 towards_II the_AT offending_JJ parent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II our_APPGE case_NN1 ,_, the_AT latent_JJ variable_NN1 approach_NN1 provides_VVZ insights_NN2 about_II results_NN2 from_II analyses_NN2 with_IW observed_JJ variables_NN2 because_CS it_PPH1 uncovered_VVD possible_JJ underlying_JJ mechanisms_NN2 leading_VVG to_II observed_JJ differences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 four_MC studies_NN2 show_VV0 that_CST the_AT relation_NN1 between_II implicit_JJ aggressiveness/angriness_NN1 and_CC behavioural_JJ measures_NN2 does_VDZ indeed_RR depend_VVI on_II the_AT following_JJ boundary_NN1 conditions_NN2 :_: the_AT provocation_NN1 of_IO aggressive_JJ behaviour_NN1 (_( Richetin_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ,_, high_JJ explicit_JJ aggressiveness_NN1 (_( Bluemke_NP1 &;_NULL Friese_NP2 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, low_JJ working_JJ memory_NN1 capacity_NN1 (_( Hofmann_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2008_MC ,_, Study_NN1 3_MC )_) and_CC lack_NN1 of_IO other_JJ self-regulatory_JJ resources_NN2 (_( Schmidt_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II calculating_VVG the_AT unauthorized_JJ estimates_NN2 ,_, Pew_NN1 uses_VVZ a_AT1 residual_JJ methodology_NN1 based_VVN on_II Census_NN1 Bureau_NN1 data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 was_VBDZ true_JJ for_IF both_DB2 perspectives_NN2 (_( i.e._REX ,_, giving_VVG and_CC receiving_VVG feedback_NN1 )_) ,_, when_CS we_PPIS2 compared_VVD the_AT average_JJ time_NNT1 that_CST had_VHD elapsed_VVN since_CS the_AT most_RGT recent_JJ feedback_NN1 episode_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 kind_NN1 ,_, and_CC when_CS we_PPIS2 asked_VVD for_IF direct_JJ estimates_NN2 of_IO feedback_NN1 frequency_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT therapists_NN2 are_VBR predominantly_RR clinical_JJ psychologists_NN2 ,_, trainee_NN1 clinical_JJ psychologists_NN2 ,_, or_CC CBT_NP1 therapists_NN2 ,_, and_CC all_DB receive_VV0 regular_JJ individual_NN1 and/or_CC group_NN1 supervision_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ important_JJ to_TO ascertain_VVI whether_CSW MT_NP1 functions_NN2 in_II a_AT1 theoretically_RR expected_JJ way_NN1 with_II31 regard_II32 to_II33 key_JJ features_NN2 of_IO our_APPGE working_JJ definition_NN1 ,_, namely_REX ,_, perceived_VVD stress_NN1 ,_, performance_NN1 ,_, goal_NN1 attainment_NN1 ,_, and_CC thriving_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR electronically_RR searched_VVD programs_NN2 from_II the_AT last_MD eight_MC Society_NN1 for_IF Industrial_JJ and_CC Organizational_JJ Psychology_NN1 conferences_NN2 (_( 2005-2012_MCMC )_) and_CC the_AT last_MD eight_MC annual_JJ Academy_NN1 of_IO Management_NN1 conferences_NN2 (_( 2005-2012_MCMC )_) ,_, and_CC contacted_VVD researchers_NN2 who_PNQS conducted_VVD research_NN1 on_II narcissism_NN1 and_CC leadership_NN1 to_TO obtain_VVI unpublished_JJ manuscripts_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Two_MC additional_JJ children_NN2 were_VBDR tested_VVN but_CCB had_VHD to_TO be_VBI excluded_VVN from_II analyses_NN2 for_IF not_XX completing_VVG the_AT tasks_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO CSR_NP1 may_VM lead_VVI one_PN1 to_TO identify_VVI more_RGR strongly_RR with_IW co-present_JJ others_NN2 (_( that_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO shared_JJ identity_NN1 could_VM arise_VVI from_II a_AT1 sense_NN1 of_IO CSR_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Consistent_JJ with_IW the_AT adult_NN1 literature_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD leftward_RL and_CC upward_JJ bisection_NN1 errors_NN2 that_CST got_VVD more_RRR pronounced_VVN around_RG 5_MC or_CC 6years_FO of_IO age_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Zeng_VV0 and_CC Greenfield_NP1 (_( 2015_MC )_) use_VV0 four_MC words_NN2 which_DDQ are_VBR not_XX brought_VVN in_II direct_JJ opposition_NN1 to_II each_PPX221 other_PPX222 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT present_JJ research_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 tested_VVD the_AT validity_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE DoPL_NN1 account_NN1 of_IO social_JJ power_NN1 motives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Delirium_NN1 can_VM compromise_VVI the_AT success_NN1 of_IO stroke_NN1 rehabilitation_NN1 ,_, and_CC incurs_VVZ significant_JJ health_NN1 care_NN1 costs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 period_NN1 is_VBZ characterized_VVN by_II the_AT onset_NN1 of_IO grasp_NN1 movements_NN2 and_CC a_AT1 right_JJ lateral_JJ bias_NN1 ,_, corresponding_VVG to_II the_AT onset_NN1 of_IO hand_NN1 preference_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, with_IW exception_NN1 of_IO one_MC1 analysis_NN1 considering_II the_AT multiplicative_JJ predictive_JJ pattern_NN1 (_( Bluemke_NP1 &;_NULL Friese_NP2 ,_, 2012_MC ,_, Study_NN1 3_MC )_) ,_, all_DB tests_NN2 examining_VVG the_AT predictive_JJ validity_NN1 of_IO behaviour_NN1 versions_NN2 of_IO an_AT1 aggressiveness_NN1 IAT_NN1 were_VBDR significant_JJ in_II the_AT expected_JJ direction_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 Bayesian_JJ analysis_NN1 of_IO effects_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 found_VVD positive_JJ evidence_NN1 against_II the_AT inclusion_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 Training_NN1 ×_II Stimulus_NN1 interaction_NN1 term_NN1 for_IF both_DB2 metacognitive_JJ bias_NN1 and_CC metacognitive_JJ efficiency_NN1 (_( see_VV0 Table_NN1 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT well-adjusted_JJ class_NN1 is_VBZ also_RR characterized_VVN by_II a_AT1 high_JJ probability_NN1 of_IO low_JJ antisocial_JJ behavior_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Observers_NN2 in_II most_RGT ecologically_RR valid_JJ settings_NN2 witness_VV0 action_NN1 events_NN2 in_II which_DDQ multiple_JJ goals_NN2 are_VBR interleaved_VVN together_RL ,_, as_CSA in_II the_AT foregoing_JJ scenario_NN1 of_IO the_AT preschooler_JJR and_CC her_APPGE father_NN1 (_( see_VV0 also_RR Offer_VV0 &;_NULL Schneider_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Finally_RR ,_, intervention_NN1 group_NN1 parent-observed_NN1 changes_NN2 in_II child_NN1 nutrition_NN1 behaviors_NN2 were_VBDR assessed_VVN at_II postsurvey_NN1 only_RR ,_, and_CC therefore_RR ,_, statistical_JJ changes_NN2 over_II time_NNT1 were_VBDR not_XX testable_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT first_MD day_NNT1 consisted_VVN of_IO psychoeducation_NN1 ,_, focusing_VVG on_II learning_VVG about_II anxiety_NN1 ,_, AS_CSA ,_, panic_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT anxiety_NN1 cycle_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, with_IW 22_MC players_NN2 ,_, the_AT resulting_JJ sampling_NN1 frequency_NN1 is_VBZ 1000_MC Hz_NNU divided_VVN by_II 22_MC is_VBZ 45_MC Hz_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA explicated_VVN earlier_RRR ,_, we_PPIS2 anticipated_VVD a_AT1 displaced_JJ aggression_NN1 pattern_NN1 of_IO results_NN2 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 on_II days_NNT2 when_RRQ employees_NN2 felt_VVD more_RGR emotional_JJ exhaustion_NN1 ,_, they_PPHS2 would_VM engage_VVI in_II withdrawal_NN1 at_II work_NN1 but_CCB not_XX conflict_NN1 and_CC that_CST the_AT reverse_JJ pattern_NN1 would_VM emerge_VVI at_II home_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II return_NN1 ,_, priming_VVG offers_NN2 researchers_NN2 working_VVG with_IW artificial_JJ languages_NN2 a_AT1 new_JJ and_CC powerful_JJ tool_NN1 to_TO probe_VVI the_AT representations_NN2 underlying_VVG their_APPGE participants_NN2 '_NULL linguistic_JJ knowledge_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Our_APPGE study_NN1 ,_, however_RR ,_, did_VDD not_XX show_VVI a_AT1 significant_JJ JTC_NP1 bias_NN1 or_CC a_AT1 significant_JJ verbal_JJ fluency_NN1 deficit_NN1 in_II patients_NN2 ,_, most_RGT likely_JJ because_CS our_APPGE patient_JJ sample_NN1 was_VBDZ stable_JJ with_IW relatively_RR lower_JJR scores_NN2 on_II relevant_JJ symptoms_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 delusions_NN2 (_( Garety_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Bristow_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC )_) and_CC we_PPIS2 assessed_VVD only_RR phonemic_JJ fluency_NN1 in_II which_DDQ schizophrenia_NN1 patients_NN2 are_VBR generally_RR less_RGR impaired_JJ than_CSN semantic_JJ fluency_NN1 (_( Bokat_NP1 and_CC Goldberg_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS so_RG little_DA1 is_VBZ known_VVN about_II what_DDQ factors_VVZ moderate_JJ performance_NN1 in_II allocentric_JJ spatial_JJ memory_NN1 in_II this_DD1 age_NN1 range_NN1 ,_, testing_VVG these_DD2 two_MC effects_NN2 serves_VVZ to_TO address_VVI a_AT1 major_JJ gap_NN1 in_II the_AT existing_JJ literature_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Namely_REX ,_, therapists_NN2 responded_VVN to_II three_MC items_NN2 on_II a_AT1 five-point_JJ Likert_NP1 scale_NN1 :_: (_( 1_MC1 )_) "_" In_II the_AT session_NNT1 you_PPY just_RR completed_VVN with_IW your_APPGE client_NN1 ,_, please_RR approximate_VV0 how_RGQ often_RR the_AT client_NN1 opposed_VVN or_CC went_VVD against_II the_AT direction_NN1 you_PPY were_VBDR setting/wanting_VVG to_TO go_VVI in_II "_" (_( "_" Not_XX at_RR21 all_RR22 "_" to_II "_" A_AT1 whole_JJ lot_NN1 "_" )_) ,_, (_( 2_MC )_) "_" How_RRQ cooperative_NN1 was_VBDZ the_AT client_NN1 in_II this_DD1 sessionfi_VVZ "_" (_( "_" Not_XX at_II all_DB cooperative_JJ "_" to_TO "_" Extremely_RR cooperative_JJ "_" )_) ,_, and_CC (_( 3_MC )_) "_" How_RGQ often_RR did_VDD you_PPY feel_VVI that_CST you_PPY and_CC the_AT client_NN1 were_VBDR at_II cross-purposes_NN2 ?_? "_" 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT Stroop_NN1 test_NN1 occurred_VVD after_II every_AT1 trial_NN1 in_II all_DB three_MC practice_NN1 sessions_NNT2 for_IF those_DD2 two_MC groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Most_DAT research_NN1 conducted_VVN on_II infidelity_NN1 analyzed_VVD responses_NN2 to_II hypothetical_JJ imagined_JJ scenarios_NN2 and_CC not_XX actual_JJ infidelity_NN1 experiences_NN2 (_( Sharpe_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Conventional_JJ HRM_NP1 interventionssuch_NN1 as_CSA training_NN1 to_TO develop_VVI sustainability-relevant_JJ knowledge_NN1 ,_, skills_NN2 and_CC awarenessis_NN1 often_RR the_AT first_MD stage_NN1 of_IO HRM_NP1 involvement_NN1 (_( cf._VV0 ,_, Jabbour_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Jabbour_NP1 ,_, Teixeira_NP1 ,_, Oliveira_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Soubihia_NP1 ,_, 2010_MC )_) and_CC such_DA training_NN1 may_VM be_VBI especially_RR effective_JJ for_IF employees_NN2 who_PNQS do_VD0 not_XX personally_RR identify_VVI with_IW sustainability_NN1 issues_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, when_CS the_AT search_NN1 target_NN1 is_VBZ constant_JJ ,_, the_AT WM_NP1 item_NN1 can_VM hold_VVI a_AT1 more_RGR dominant_JJ position_NN1 and_CC influences_NN2 search_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT questions_NN2 were_VBDR designed_VVN to_TO assess_VVI an_AT1 individual_JJ '_NULL s_ZZ1 beliefs_NN2 on_II the_AT level_NN1 of_IO control_NN1 that_CST god_NN1 (_( first_MD 8_MC questions_NN2 )_) and_CC powerful_JJ other_JJ individuals_NN2 (_( last_MD eight_MC questions_NN2 )_) have_VH0 on_II their_APPGE lives_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 second_MD reform_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ was_VBDZ announced_VVN in_II April_NPM1 2000_MC and_CC implemented_VVN on_II July_NPM1 1_MC1 ,_, 2000_MC ,_, however_RR ,_, dramatically_RR expanded_VVD the_AT use_NN1 of_IO community_NN1 service_NN1 ,_, allowing_VVG judges_NN2 also_RR to_II sentence_NN1 offenders_NN2 of_IO drunk_JJ driving_JJ and_CC other_JJ serious_JJ traffic_NN1 offenses_VVZ to_II community_NN1 service_NN1 instead_II21 of_II22 incarceration_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 studies_NN2 have_VH0 highlighted_VVN early_JJ onset_NN1 of_IO gambling_NN1 ,_, poor_JJ levels_NN2 of_IO academic_JJ attainment_NN1 and_CC disrupted_JJ family_NN1 relationships_NN2 as_CSA key_JJ risk_NN1 factors_NN2 for_IF gambling_NN1 problems_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Similarly_RR ,_, there_EX is_VBZ not_XX a_AT1 clear_JJ and_CC agreed-upon_II rule_NN1 about_II which_DDQ contours_NN2 are_VBR relevant_JJ and_CC which_DDQ ones_NN2 are_VBR not_XX ._. 
</s>
<s>
First_MD ,_, the_AT original_JJ explanation-and_CC the_AT source_NN1 of_IO the_AT "_" satisfaction_NN1 of_IO search_NN1 "_" name-suggests_VVZ that_CST searchers_NN2 become_VV0 "_" satisfied_JJ "_" with_IW the_AT meaning_NN1 of_IO the_AT search_NN1 on_II locating_VVG a_AT1 first_MD target_NN1 and_CC terminate_VV0 their_APPGE search_NN1 prematurely_RR (_( Smith_NP1 ,_, 1967_MC ;_; Tuddenham_NP1 ,_, 1962_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, Duncan_NP1 (_( 1976_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST participants_NN2 interpreted_VVD ambiguous_JJ behavior_NN1 as_CSA being_VBG more_RGR hostile_JJ if_CS the_AT same_DA act_NN1 was_VBDZ perpetrated_VVN by_II a_AT1 Black_JJ ,_, relative_II21 to_II22 a_AT1 White_JJ ,_, target_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Future_JJ research_NN1 should_VM aim_VVI to_TO explicitly_RR test_VVI the_AT impact_NN1 of_IO age_NN1 truncation_NN1 on_II the_AT magnitude_NN1 of_IO the_AT lifespan_NN1 variation_NN1 gradient_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II their_APPGE study_NN1 ,_, Houdé_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2011_MC )_) identified_VVD four_MC different_JJ areas_NN2 within_II the_AT IFC/LPFC_NP1 for_IF which_DDQ the_AT group_NN1 of_IO conservers_NN2 showed_VVD significantly_RR stronger_JJR activation_NN1 than_CSN the_AT group_NN1 of_IO non-conservers_NN2 while_CS solving_VVG conflict_NN1 trials_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX is_VBZ particular_JJ potential_NN1 for_IF confounding_VVG when_RRQ linguistic_JJ behaviors_NN2 indicating_VVG that_CST the_AT parent_NN1 has_VHZ accurately_RR read_VVN the_AT child_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 cues_NN2 are_VBR viewed_VVN as_CSA indicators_NN2 of_IO both_RR sensitivity_NN1 and_CC mind-mindedness_NN1 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 seems_VVZ inevitable_JJ that_CST sensitivity_NN1 coders_NN2 will_VM be_VBI influenced_VVN by_II parent_NN1 language_NN1 ,_, unless_CS coding_VVG from_II a_AT1 video-clip_NN1 with_IW no_AT sound_NN1 (_( which_DDQ would_VM likely_RR diminish_VVI the_AT validity_NN1 of_IO the_AT sensitivity_NN1 assessment_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 social_JJ networks_NN2 facilitate_VV0 gaining_VVG important_JJ insights_NN2 into_II the_AT organization_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 environment_NN1 and_CC building_NN1 trust_NN1 with_IW local_JJ partners_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, the_AT association_NN1 between_II child_NN1 sexual_JJ abuse_NN1 and_CC RF_NP1 supports_VVZ the_AT criterion_NN1 validity_NN1 of_IO the_AT observational_JJ coding_NN1 system_NN1 specifically_RR developed_VVN to_TO assess_VVI mentalization_NN1 with_IW the_AT CAI_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RRQV it_PPH1 was_VBDZ shown_VVN that_CST the_AT cellular_JJ ratio_NN1 of_IO complex_JJ I/II_FU to_II mitochondrial_JJ STAT3_FO is_VBZ 105_MC ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST STAT3_FO is_VBZ modulating_VVG oxidative_JJ phosphorylation_NN1 through_II transcriptional_JJ regulation_NN1 rather_CS21 than_CS22 direct_VVI protein_NN1 interaction_NN1 between_II complex_JJ I/II_FU and_CC STAT3_FO (_( Phillips_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2010_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Restricting_VVG the_AT phenotype_NN1 sample_NN1 size_NN1 to_II a_AT1 minimum_NN1 of_IO 5%_NNU of_IO participants_NN2 may_VM potentially_RR prevent_VVI additional_JJ clinically_RR meaningful_JJ groups_NN2 being_VBG identified_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Wood_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2016_MC )_) also_RR tested_VVN whether_CSW answering_VVG a_AT1 greater_JJR number_NN1 of_IO questions_NN2 about_II future_JJ behaviour_NN1 (_( which_DDQ might_VM be_VBI expected_VVN to_TO increase_VVI cognitive_JJ dissonance_NN1 )_) increased_VVD the_AT QBE_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
So_RG far_RR ,_, the_AT temporal_JJ dynamics_NN of_IO the_AT influence_NN1 of_IO emotional_JJ signals_NN2 on_II motor_NN1 corticospinal_JJ excitability_NN1 remain_VV0 elusive_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT corresponding_JJ weighted_JJ R2_FO effect_NN1 sizes_NN2 were_VBDR much_RR larger_JJR for_IF women_NN2 :_: 0.324_MC (_( for_IF Cohen_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 d_ZZ1 )_) and_CC 0.385_MC (_( for_IF median_JJ income_NN1 difference_NN1 percentages_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS the_AT recalibration_NN1 effects_NN2 that_CST we_PPIS2 have_VH0 observed_VVN are_VBR in_II fact_NN1 a_AT1 consequence_NN1 of_IO interrupting_VVG the_AT lexical_JJ support_NN1 that_CST recalibration_NN1 requires_VVZ ,_, then_RT the_AT medium_JJ term_NN1 repetition_NN1 priming_VVG effects_NN2 should_VM follow_VVI the_AT same_DA pattern_NN1 as_CSA the_AT recalibration_NN1 effects_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Congruently_RR with_IW our_APPGE hypothesis_NN1 ,_, results_NN2 of_IO this_DD1 study_NN1 showed_VVD that_CST spiritual_JJ rituals_NN2 were_VBDR related_VVN to_II adaptive_JJ communal_JJ coping_NN1 strategies_NN2 ,_, like_II reappraisal_NN1 ,_, regulated_VVD emotional_JJ expression_NN1 ,_, distraction_NN1 ,_, searching_VVG for_IF social_JJ support_NN1 and_CC low_JJ avoidance_NN1 and_CC venting_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT number_NN1 of_IO RDoC-oriented_JJ investigator-initiated_JJ applications_NN2 is_VBZ also_RR rising_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
On_II a_AT1 physiological_JJ level_NN1 ,_, adversity_NN1 is_VBZ associated_VVN with_IW disrupted_JJ regulation_NN1 in_II both_RR parents_NN2 and_CC infants_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Power_NN1 distance_NN1 appears_VVZ to_TO be_VBI associated_VVN with_IW preferences_NN2 for_IF virtual_JJ tool_NN1 use_NN1 in_II teams_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Once_CS the_AT quality_NN1 of_IO the_AT development_NN1 studies_NN2 and_CC content_JJ validity_NN1 studies_NN2 were_VBDR rated_VVN for_IF each_DD1 measure_NN1 ,_, the_AT content_JJ validity_NN1 of_IO an_AT1 outcome_NN1 measure_NN1 was_VBDZ evaluated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT time_NNT1 of_IO the_AT study_NN1 ,_, no_AT participants_NN2 were_VBDR taking_VVG medication_NN1 known_VVN to_TO affect_VVI the_AT central_JJ nervous_JJ system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, synchronized_VVD activity_NN1 of_IO both_DB2 large-scale_JJ and_CC specialized_JJ brain_NN1 networks_NN2 appears_VVZ to_TO be_VBI altered_VVN in_II spatial_JJ neglect_NN1 ,_, and_CC the_AT synchronized_JJ activity_NN1 in_II both_DB2 dorsal_JJ attention_NN1 networks_NN2 and_CC motor_NN1 networks_NN2 may_VM be_VBI linked_VVN to_II stroke-related_JJ deficits_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 found_VVD only_RR two_MC existing_JJ studies_NN2 in_II trauma-exposed_JJ populations_NN2 that_CST have_VH0 employed_VVN a_AT1 longitudinal_JJ design_NN1 and_CC examined_VVN P300_FO as_II a_AT1 state_NN1 marker_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT agreeableness_NN1 domain_NN1 ,_, the_AT indirect_JJ measures_NN2 of_IO aggressiveness_NN1 have_VH0 most_RGT often_RR been_VBN investigated_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS we_PPIS2 used_VVD higher-order_JJ factors_NN2 ,_, results_NN2 could_VM be_VBI generalised_VVN for_IF scales_NN2 that_CST can_VM be_VBI included_VVN in_II these_DD2 categories_NN2 ,_, but_CCB were_VBDR not_XX assessed_VVN by_II the_AT questionnaires_NN2 used_VVN in_II this_DD1 research_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II comparison_NN1 to_II non-explanations_NN2 ,_, these_DD2 level-1_MC1 explanations_NN2 inspired_VVD significantly_RR more_RGR follow-up_JJ questions_NN2 and_CC fewer_DAR re-asks_VVZ of_IO the_AT original_JJ question_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 literature_NN1 suggests_VVZ that_CST retail_JJ marketing_NN1 for_IF marijuana_NN1 may_VM also_RR be_VBI impacted_VVN by_II characteristics_NN2 of_IO the_AT retailer_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 neighborhood_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Gadermann_VV0 ,_, Guhn_NP1 ,_, and_CC Zumbo_NP1 (_( 2012_MC )_) found_VVD that_CST Cronbach_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 alpha_NN1 underestimates_VVZ the_AT reliability_NN1 of_IO scales_NN2 comprised_VVN of_IO dichotomous_JJ items_NN2 because_CS it_PPH1 is_VBZ based_VVN on_II the_AT Pearson_NP1 covariance_NN1 matrix_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ assumes_VVZ that_CST items_NN2 are_VBR continuous_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT psychometrics_NN1 of_IO the_AT scale_NN1 have_VH0 not_XX been_VBN adequately_RR summarised_VVN and_CC evaluated_VVN to_TO provide_VVI clear_JJ recommendations_NN2 regarding_II its_APPGE use_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Resources_NN2 including_II objects_NN2 ,_, conditions_NN2 ,_, and_CC personal_JJ characteristics_NN2 play_VV0 a_AT1 central_JJ role_NN1 in_II most_DAT models_NN2 of_IO the_AT stress_NN1 process_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Female_JJ friends_NN2 may_VM share_VVI information_NN1 about_II sexual_JJ antics_NN2 of_IO others_NN2 ,_, as_CSA a_AT1 way_NN1 of_IO storing_VVG up_RP ammunition_NN1 should_VM one_MC1 of_IO them_PPHO2 find_VV0 herself_PPX1 competing_VVG against_II the_AT other_JJ for_IF male_JJ attention_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Results_NN2 revealed_VVD no_AT significant_JJ difference_NN1 in_II RJA_NP1 after_II accounting_VVG for_IF the_AT number_NN1 of_IO attentional_JJ bids_NN2 made_VVN by_II the_AT experimenter_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Further_JJR research_NN1 might_VM look_VVI at_II the_AT development_NN1 of_IO children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 understanding_NN1 of_IO both_DB2 transient_JJ and_CC stable_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO subjective_JJ costs_NN2 and_CC rewards_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Psychotic_JJ experiences_NN2 were_VBDR assessed_VVN by_II the_AT following_JJ five_MC items_NN2 :_: i_ZZ1 )_) "_" Have_VH0 you_PPY ever_RR heard_VVN voices_NN2 that_CST other_JJ people_NN can_VM not_XX hear_VVI ?_? "_" 
</s>
<s>
Here_RL the_AT concept_NN1 of_IO employment_NN1 gap_NN1 is_VBZ introduced_VVN to_TO account_VVI for_IF the_AT combined_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO multiple_JJ factors_NN2 that_CST influence_VV0 whether_CSW an_AT1 initial_JJ attraction_NN1 will_VM lead_VVI to_II intentions_NN2 to_TO apply_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT authors_NN2 of_IO the_AT PDP_NP1 Volumes_NN2 envisioned_VVD an_AT1 interdisciplinary_JJ audience_NN1 ,_, one_PN1 that_CST included_VVD cognitive_JJ psychologists_NN2 ,_, those_DD2 working_VVG in_II artificial_JJ intelligence_NN1 and_CC computer_NN1 science_NN1 ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 neuroscientists_NN2 (_( Rumelhart_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1986_MC ,_, p._NN1 xi_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Experiment_VV0 1_MC1 replicated_VVD Magoon_NP1 and_CC Critchfield_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 (_( 2008_MC )_) finding_VVG that_DD1 enhanced_JJ sensitivity_NN1 to_II reinforcement-rate_JJ differentials_NN2 occurs_VVZ when_RRQ money-gain_JJ positive_JJ and_CC loss-avoidance_JJ negative_JJ reinforcement_NN1 compete_VV0 in_II concurrent_JJ schedules_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Work_NN1 and_CC Social_JJ Adjustment_NN1 Scale_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 reliable_JJ and_CC valid_JJ measure_NN1 that_CST has_VHZ been_VBN widely_RR used_VVN to_TO assess_VVI functionality_NN1 in_II31 relation_II32 to_II33 a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO different_JJ disorders_NN2 (_( Cella_NP1 ,_, Sharpe_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Chalder_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Mataix-Colsa_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2005_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II31 line_II32 with_II33 the_AT procedure_NN1 used_VVN in_II Study_NN1 1_MC1 ,_, we_PPIS2 first_MD tested_VVN for_IF measurement_NN1 invariance_NN1 over_II time_NNT1 and_CC between_II groups_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II Kumar_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2009_MC )_) participants_NN2 were_VBDR asked_VVN to_TO hold_VVI an_AT1 item_NN1 in_II WM_NP1 and_CC search_NN1 for_IF a_AT1 different_JJ target_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Items_NN2 were_VBDR selected_VVN on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO factor_NN1 loading_VVG in_II previous_JJ studies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT design_NN1 was_VBDZ between-subjects_NN2 2_MC justice_NN1 valence_NN1 (_( just_RR ,_, unjust_JJ )_) x_ZZ1 2_MC social_JJ comparison_NN1 processes_NN2 (_( autonomous_JJ judgements_NN2 ,_, comparative_JJ judgements_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II one_MC1 functional_JJ run_NN1 ,_, 20_MC blocks_NN2 were_VBDR completed_VVN and_CC blocks_NN2 were_VBDR separated_VVN by_II a_AT1 jittered_JJ rest_NN1 block_NN1 with_IW an_AT1 average_JJ duration_NN1 of_IO 7_MC s_ZZ1 (_( which_DDQ varied_VVD between_II 5_MC and_CC 9_MC s_ZZ1 with_IW 500_MC ms_NN1 steps_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 considered_VVD this_DD1 an_AT1 important_JJ distinction_NN1 because_CS ,_, although_CS a_AT1 high_JJ level_NN1 of_IO temporal_JJ specificity_NN1 might_VM not_XX be_VBI important_JJ in_II some_DD contexts_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 in_II the_AT construction_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 life_NN1 story_NN1 (_( Pathman_NP1 ,_, Doydum_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ,_, it_PPH1 could_VM be_VBI crucial_JJ in_II other_JJ contexts_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 legal_JJ settings_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, because_II21 of_II22 the_AT physical_JJ layout_NN1 of_IO the_AT receptors_NN2 on_II the_AT retina_NN1 ,_, in_II each_DD1 eye_NN1 there_EX is_VBZ a_AT1 region_NN1 that_CST lacks_VVZ receptors-the_AT "_" blind_JJ spot_NN1 "_" ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 study_NN1 by_II Freeth_NP1 ,_, Foulsham_NP1 ,_, and_CC Kingstone_NP1 (_( 2013_MC )_) noted_VVD that_CST participants_NN2 looked_VVD more_RRR at_II the_AT experimenter_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 face_NN1 than_CSN other_JJ parts_NN2 of_IO the_AT scene_NN1 when_CS direct_JJ eye_NN1 contact_NN1 was_VBDZ made_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_IF Religious_JJ Exposure_NN1 ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 large_JJ significant_JJ effect_NN1 of_IO religious_JJ group_NN1 ,_, such_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT Muslim_JJ and_CC Protestant_JJ families_NN2 were_VBDR similar_JJ to_II each_PPX221 other_PPX222 and_CC had_VHD significantly_RR higher_JJR religious_JJ exposure_NN1 than_CSN the_AT Catholic_JJ families_NN2 ,_, who_PNQS had_VHD significantly_RR higher_JJR exposure_NN1 than_CSN the_AT Non-Affiliated_JJ families_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS the_AT majority_NN1 had_VHD been_VBN in_II their_APPGE current_JJ position_NN1 5_MC years_NNT2 or_CC less_RRR ,_, they_PPHS2 had_VHD been_VBN in_II their_APPGE current_JJ fields_NN2 10_MC years_NNT2 or_CC more_RRR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Moreover_RR ,_, caffeine_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ closely_RR resembles_VVZ adenosine_NN1 and_CC binds_VVZ to_II the_AT same_DA receptors_NN2 ,_, also_RR permeates_VVZ the_AT BBB_NP1 (_( McCall_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 1982_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
D2Rs_FO modulate_NN1 motor_NN1 signals_NN2 ,_, suggesting_VVG a_AT1 specific_JJ role_NN1 in_II relaying_VVG motor_NN1 commands_VVZ to_II downstream_JJ areas_NN2 preparing_VVG behavioral_JJ responses_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 removed_VVD responses_NN2 to_II incorrect_JJ primes_NN2 ,_, just_RR as_CSA in_II the_AT previous_JJ experiment_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Principal_JJ component_NN1 analysis_NN1 (_( PCA_NP1 )_) was_VBDZ used_VVN to_TO determine_VVI if_CSW the_AT inverse_JJ relationship_NN1 between_II these_DD2 components_NN2 was_VBDZ due_II21 to_II22 their_APPGE temporal_JJ and_CC spatial_JJ overlap_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Confidence_NN1 intervals_NN2 for_IF means_NN were_VBDR provided_VVN in_II some_DD form_NN1 in_II very_RG few_DA2 papers_NN2 (_( see_VV0 Fig._NN1 ?_? 2_MC )_) ,_, with_IW PS_NN1 journals_NN2 showing_VVG a_AT1 larger_JJR increase_NN1 from_II 2013_MC than_CSN QJEP_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
To_TO determine_VVI if_CSW HMMs_NP1 responded_VVD slower_RRR to_II AX_NP1 and_CC BX_NP1 trials_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 conducted_VVD two_MC independent-samples_NN2 t_ZZ1 tests_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 reputational_JJ aspect_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE norm_NN1 psychology_NN1 means_VVZ that_CST humans_NN2 are_VBR sensitive_JJ to_II cues_NN2 of_IO social_JJ monitoring_NN1 (_( Bering_NP1 &;_NULL Johnson_NP1 2005_MC )_) ,_, attend_VV0 keenly_RR to_II social_JJ expectations_NN2 and_CC public_JJ observation_NN1 (_( Fehr_NP1 &;_NULL Fischbacher_NP1 2003_MC )_) and_CC anticipate_VV0 a_AT1 world_NN1 governed_VVN by_II social_JJ rules_NN2 with_IW sanctions_NN2 for_IF norm_NN1 violations_NN2 (_( Chudek_NP1 &;_NULL Henrich_NP1 2011_MC ;_; Fehret_NP1 al_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
2002_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT purpose_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO make_VVI sure_JJ that_CST children_NN2 had_VHD paid_VVN attention_NN1 to_II the_AT story_NN1 and_CC understood_VVN the_AT zav_NN1 sequence_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
While_CS the_AT first_MD set_NN1 of_IO analyses_NN2 examined_VVD the_AT best_JJT predictors_NN2 of_IO feeling_VVG state_NN1 overall_RR rated_VVN after_II the_AT practice_NN1 had_VHD completed_VVN ,_, the_AT second_MD set_NN1 of_IO analyses_NN2 examined_VVD the_AT relationships_NN2 among_II changes_NN2 in_II exertion_NN1 ,_, accomplishment_NN1 ,_, and_CC feeling_VVG state_NN1 from_II one_MC1 section_NN1 of_IO practice_NN1 to_II the_AT next_MD during_II practices_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS everything_PN1 is_VBZ set-up_NN1 ,_, the_AT experimenter_NN1 asks_VVZ the_AT participant_NN1 to_TO immerse_VVI his/her_APPGE hand_NN1 into_II the_AT ice_NN1 water_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, Study_NN1 2_MC offered_VVD a_AT1 more_RGR precise_JJ account_NN1 of_IO these_DD2 effects_NN2 by_II demonstrating_VVG that_CST perceived_VVD goal_NN1 progress_NN1 only_RR alters_VVZ the_AT meaning-relevant_JJ consequences_NN2 of_IO MS_NN1 for_IF people_NN who_PNQS are_VBR low_JJ in_II locomotion_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 observation_NN1 replicates_VVZ previous_JJ work_NN1 identifying_VVG a_AT1 relationship_NN1 between_II Yes/No_UH recognition_NN1 performance_NN1 with_IW similar_JJ foils_NN2 and_CC a_AT1 measure_NN1 of_IO recall_NN1 ability_NN1 in_II older_JJR adults_NN2 (_( Holden_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Migo_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Toner_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, and_CC extends_VVZ this_DD1 work_NN1 by_II identifying_VVG a_AT1 similar_JJ relationship_NN1 for_IF executive_NN1 function_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, the_AT hot_JJ condition_NN1 was_VBDZ more_RGR effective_JJ for_IF the_AT adolescents_NN2 with_IW higher_JJR initial_NN1 levels_NN2 of_IO EF_NP1 ,_, although_CS this_DD1 was_VBDZ a_AT1 relatively_RR small_JJ effect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
However_RR ,_, the_AT notion_NN1 of_IO proving_VVG one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 innocence_NN1 is_VBZ not_XX as_RG straightforward_JJ as_CSA it_PPH1 initially_RR appears_VVZ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Social_JJ change_NN1 refers_VVZ to_II the_AT emergence_NN1 of_IO novel_JJ intergroup_JJ boundaries_NN2 in_II society_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ represent_VV0 tangible_JJ '_NULL cognitive_JJ alternatives_NN2 '_NULL to_II the_AT status_NN121 quo_NN122 (_( Turner_NP1 &;_NULL Brown_NP1 ,_, 1978_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT writing_NN1 of_IO summary_NN1 tables_NN2 for_IF each_DD1 theme_NN1 involved_VVN a_AT1 further_JJR checking_NN1 of_IO the_AT developing_JJ story_NN1 of_IO each_DD1 theme_NN1 against_II the_AT thematic_JJ map_NN1 and_CC the_AT original_JJ data_NN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT assessment_NN1 included_VVD measurements_NN2 of_IO height_NN1 and_CC weight_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Next_MD ,_, children_NN2 played_VVN with_IW a_AT1 confederate_NN1 during_II which_DDQ ,_, for_IF a_AT1 subset_NN1 of_IO children_NN2 ,_, two_MC toys_NN2 broke_VVD ostensibly_RR while_CS children_NN2 were_VBDR holding_VVG them_PPHO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 principal_JJ components_NN2 analysis_NN1 revealed_VVD three_MC separate_JJ components_NN2 of_IO collective_JJ action_NN1 intentions_NN2 :_: relatively_RR normative_JJ actions_NN2 (_( participating_VVG in_II discussion_NN1 meetings_NN2 ,_, participating_VVG in_II plenary_JJ meetings_NN2 ,_, writing_VVG flyers_NN2 ,_, signing_VVG a_AT1 complaint_NN1 against_II the_AT unconstitutionality_NN1 of_IO tuition_NN1 fees_NN2 ,_, street_NN1 theatre_NN1 ,_, demonstrations_NN2 ;_; M_ZZ1 =_FO 4.20_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 1.80_MC )_) ,_, nonviolent_JJ non-normative_JJ actions_NN2 (_( disturbing_JJ events_NN2 ,_, blocking_JJ university_NN1 buildings_NN2 ,_, blocking_VVG a_AT1 highway_NN1 ;_; M_ZZ1 =_FO 2.93_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO 1.78_MC )_) and_CC violent_JJ non-normative_JJ actions_NN2 (_( throwing_VVG stones_NN2 or_CC bottles_NN2 ,_, arson_NN1 attacks_NN2 on_II university_NN1 buildings_NN2 ,_, arson_NN1 attacks_NN2 on_II private_JJ property_NN1 ,_, attacks_NN2 on_II the_AT police_NN2 ,_, attacks_NN2 on_II responsible_JJ persons_NN2 ;_; M_ZZ1 =_FO 1.13_MC ,_, SD_NP1 =_FO .61_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Also_RR important_JJ to_II our_APPGE study_NN1 ,_, the_AT available_JJ evidence_NN1 so_RG far_RR on_II the_AT effectiveness_NN1 of_IO behavioral_JJ nudges_NN2 utilized_VVN by_II tax_NN1 administrators_NN2 is_VBZ mixed_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT TBRS_NP1 model_NN1 predicts_VVZ that_CST increasing_VVG the_AT number_NN1 of_IO repetitions_NN2 of_IO the_AT syllable_NN1 ba_NN1 should_VM have_VHI a_AT1 detrimental_JJ effect_NN1 on_II verbal_JJ recall_NN1 performance_NN1 while_CS leaving_VVG visuospatial_JJ recall_NN1 unaffected_JJ ,_, whereas_CS SOB-CS_NP2 model_NN1 predicts_VVZ a_AT1 detrimental_JJ effect_NN1 on_II both_DB2 types_NN2 of_IO memoranda_NN2 ,_, with_IW a_AT1 smaller_JJR effect_NN1 on_II visuospatial_JJ memoranda_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Because_CS correlations_NN2 indicated_VVD that_CST the_AT relations_NN2 between_II parenting_NN1 and_CC child_NN1 EF_NN1 composite_NN1 might_VM have_VHI been_VBN primarily_RR due_II21 to_II22 the_AT MEFS_NP2 and_CC Delay_NN1 of_IO Gratification_NN1 tasks_NN2 ,_, we_PPIS2 also_RR conducted_VVN regressions_NN2 for_IF those_DD2 tasks_NN2 separately_RR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Individuals_NN2 with_IW schizophrenia_NN1 had_VHD a_AT1 lower_JJR educational_JJ level_NN1 (_( Table_NN1 1_MC1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, Schwarz_NP1 (_( 2007_MC )_) ,_, has_VHZ surmised_VVN that_CST "_" like_II many_DA2 issues_NN2 in_II science_NN1 ,_, this_DD1 issue_NN1 will_VM not_XX be_VBI settled_VVN on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO critical_JJ data_NN but_CCB on_II the_AT basis_NN1 of_IO the_AT heuristic_JJ fruitfulness_NN1 of_IO the_AT theoretical_JJ perspective_NN1 and_CC its_APPGE compatibility_NN1 with_IW other_JJ bodies_NN2 of_IO knowledge_NN1 "_" (_( pp._NNU2 651_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 also_RR test_VV0 the_AT generalizability_NN1 of_IO our_APPGE effects_NN2 with_IW a_AT1 different_JJ product_NN1 (_( vacation_NN1 resorts_VVZ )_) and_CC marketing_NN1 action_NN1 (_( advertising_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 came_VVD from_II low-_NN1 to_II middle-income_JJ households_NN2 ,_, and_CC their_APPGE ethnicities_NN2 were_VBDR representative_JJ of_IO the_AT region_NN1 as_II a_AT1 whole_NN1 (_( 40%_NNU Latino_NN1 ,_, 30%_NNU White_NP1 ,_, 24%_NNU Asian_JJ ,_, 6%_NNU other_JJ )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 eye-tracking_JJ study_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 aimed_VVD to_TO systematically_RR address_VVI these_DD2 identified_VVN research_NN1 limitations_NN2 in_II female_JJ body_NN1 perception_NN1 from_II women_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 perspective_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 study_NN1 demonstrated_VVD that_CST in_II a_AT1 culture_NN1 with_IW strong_JJ endorsement_NN1 and_CC appreciation_NN1 of_IO grit_NN1 ,_, adolescents_NN2 '_NULL academic_JJ achievement_NN1 and_CC engagement_NN1 can_VM be_VBI potentially_RR enhanced_VVN through_II fostering_NN1 grit_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, response_NN1 format_NN1 did_VDD not_XX interact_VVI with_IW either_RR the_AT list-order_NN1 or_CC word-frequency_JJ manipulations_NN2 ,_, so_CS21 that_CS22 the_AT DI_NN1 metric_JJ reacted_VVD in_II the_AT same_DA way_NN1 to_TO list_VVI order_NN1 and_CC word_NN1 frequency_NN1 under_II both_DB2 response_NN1 formats_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
If_CS so_RR ,_, then_RT I_PPIS1 wonder_VV0 again_RT along_II21 with_II22 Kegan_NP1 whether_CSW this_DD1 assumption_NN1 is_VBZ warranted_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT coefficient_NN1 on_II expected_JJ college_NN1 earnings_NN2 is_VBZ not_XX significant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Items_NN2 included_VVD number_NN1 of_IO sexual_JJ partners_NN2 in_II the_AT past_JJ six_MC months_NNT2 ;_; frequency_NN1 (_( in_II the_AT past_JJ six_MC months_NNT2 )_) of_IO vaginal_JJ ,_, oral_NN1 ,_, and_CC anal_JJ sex_NN1 without_IW a_AT1 condom_NN1 ;_; hookup_VV0 (_( casual_JJ )_) sex_NN1 ;_; sex_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 new_JJ sexual_JJ partner_NN1 without_IW getting_VVG a_AT1 sexual_JJ history_NN1 ;_; and_CC sex_NN1 with_IW a_AT1 new_JJ sex_NN1 partner_NN1 who_PNQS was_VBDZ previously_RR sexually_RR active_JJ without_IW him_PPHO1 or_CC her_APPGE having_VHG an_AT1 HIV/STI_NP1 test_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Higher_JJR scores_NN2 represent_VV0 a_AT1 greater_JJR fear_NN1 of_IO negative_JJ evaluation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Neural_JJ oscillation_NN1 resultsFig._NNU 4_MC illustrates_VVZ high-alpha_NN1 (_( 10-14_MCMC Hz_NNU )_) oscillations_NN2 in_II the_AT time_NNT1 window_NN1 of_IO 500-1720_MCMC ms_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II both_RR chimpanzees_NN2 and_CC humans_NN2 ,_, few_DA2 if_CS any_DD individuals_NN2 can_VM on_II their_APPGE own_DA physically_RR dominate_VV0 an_AT1 entire_JJ group_NN1 on_II their_APPGE own_DA (_( Boehm_NP1 ,_, 2000_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II such_DA ,_, we_PPIS2 outline_VV0 how_RGQ self-efficacy_JJ beliefs_NN2 (_( an_AT1 input_NN1 variable_NN1 at_II the_AT individual_JJ level_NN1 )_) ,_, and_CC mental_JJ models_NN2 (_( a_AT1 process_NN1 variable_NN1 at_II the_AT team_NN1 level_NN1 )_) may_VM be_VBI salient_JJ factors_NN2 predicting_VVG the_AT perceptions_NN2 that_CST referees_NN2 have_VH0 regarding_II team_NN1 adaptation_NN1 within_II the_AT context_NN1 of_IO professional_JJ football_NN1 and_CC futsal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Analyses_NN2 controlled_VVN for_IF sex_NN1 ,_, school-level_JJ SES_NP2 ,_, and_CC school-level_JJ percentage_NN1 of_IO Hispanic_JJ students_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II pilot_NN1 work_VV0 we_PPIS2 determined_VVD that_CST a_AT1 fixed-ratio_NN1 5_MC CO_FO requirement_NN1 was_VBDZ sufficient_JJ to_TO discourage_VVI excessive_JJ switching_NN1 between_II work_NN1 areas_NN2 but_CCB could_VM be_VBI completed_VVN quickly_RR (_( within_RL about_II 1_MC1 s_ZZ1 )_) and_CC therefore_RR reduced_VVD the_AT risk_NN1 of_IO adventitious_JJ negative_JJ reinforcement_NN1 of_IO switching_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 is_VBZ exactly_RR what_DDQ has_VHZ been_VBN found_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 particular_RR22 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM decide_VVI to_TO avoid_VVI sources_NN2 of_IO information_NN1 that_CST we_PPIS2 suspect_VV0 may_VM lead_VVI us_PPIO2 to_II bad_JJ evaluations_NN2 V_ZZ1 of_IO how_RRQ our_APPGE lives_NN2 are_VBR going_VVG ,_, and_CC ,_, given_VVN the_AT severe_JJ attentional_JJ limits_NN2 of_IO the_AT cognitive_JJ system_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 can_VM also_RR selectively_RR decide_VVI what_DDQ information_NN1 to_TO pay_VVI attention_NN1 to_II from_II the_AT vast_JJ amount_NN1 of_IO information_NN1 available_JJ to_II us_PPIO2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, recall_VV0 that_CST participants_NN2 in_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 over-reproduced_VVD the_AT duration_NN1 of_IO the_AT short_JJ animations_NN2 ,_, and_CC it_PPH1 is_VBZ unlikely_JJ that_CST these_DD2 over-reproductions_NN2 would_VM become_VVI even_RR longer_RRR in_II Experiment_NN1 2_MC because_CS learning_NN1 should_VM improve_VVI reproduction_NN1 accuracy_NN1 ,_, rather_II21 than_II22 making_VVG reproductions_NN2 more_RGR deviant_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT play_NN1 condition_NN1 did_VDD not_XX significantly_RR moderate_VVI the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO maternal_JJ emotion_NN1 dysregulation_NN1 on_II mother-infant_JJ facial_JJ affect_NN1 synchrony_NN1 (_( Model_NN1 4_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II other_JJ words_NN2 ,_, the_AT self-interest_NN1 of_IO followers_NN2 may_VM encourage_VVI them_PPHO2 to_TO influence_VVI a_AT1 vision_NN1 for_IF the_AT future_NN1 for_IF their_APPGE own_DA ends_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT FA_NP1 values_NN2 range_VV0 from_II 0_MC (_( equal_JJ diffusion_NN1 in_II all_DB directions_NN2 )_) to_II 1_MC1 ,_, with_IW FA_NP1 values_NN2 of_IO 0.2-1_MCMC indicating_VVG white_JJ matter_NN1 and_CC greater_JJR values_NN2 connoting_VVG greater_JJR white_JJ matter_NN1 integrity_NN1 (_( Kunimatsu_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II satellite-framed_JJ languages_NN2 ,_, where_CS the_AT motion_NN1 event_NN1 is_VBZ linguistically_RR encoded_VVN within_II one_MC1 clause_NN1 ,_, manner_NN1 and_CC path_NN1 tend_VV0 to_TO be_VBI conflated_VVN in_II a_AT1 single_JJ gesture_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Cross-cultural_JJ studies_NN2 have_VH0 recognized_VVN that_DD1 history_NN1 and_CC cultural_JJ stereotypes_NN2 affect_VV0 decisions_NN2 about_II helping_VVG victims_NN2 of_IO humanitarian_JJ crises_NN2 (_( Andrighetto_NP1 ,_, Baldissarri_NP1 ,_, Lattanzio_NP1 ,_, Loughnan_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Volpato_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Bain_FW ,_, Park_NP1 ,_, Kwok_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Haslam_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC ;_; Sun_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC )_) ,_, but_CCB psychological_JJ research_NN1 is_VBZ scarce_JJ and_CC fragmented_JJ and_CC leaves_VVZ many_DA2 questions_NN2 unanswered_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT majority_NN1 of_IO the_AT 48_MC children_NN2 who_PNQS dropped_VVD out_II21 of_II22 the_AT study_NN1 moved_VVN to_II a_AT1 different_JJ school_NN1 (_( N_ZZ1 =_FO 43_MC )_) and_CC the_AT other_JJ five_MC could_VM not_XX be_VBI assessed_VVN because_II21 of_II22 repeated_JJ absences_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
We_PPIS2 concluded_VVD from_II this_DD1 finding_NN1 that_CST at_RR21 least_RR22 four_MC letters_NN2 can_VM be_VBI attentionally_RR maintained_VVN at_II the_AT central_JJ level_NN1 of_IO WM_NP1 without_IW any_DD recourse_NN1 to_II verbal_JJ rehearsal_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 should_VM not_XX impose_VVI a_AT1 '_NULL taxonomy_NN1 of_IO situations_NN2 '_NULL inflexibly_RR ;_; instead_RR ,_, we_PPIS2 should_VM tailor_VVI different_JJ situational_JJ taxonomies_NN2 to_II our_APPGE research_NN1 needs_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
With_II31 regard_II32 to_II33 reliability_NN1 ,_, reliability_NN1 of_IO theta_NN1 (_( an_AT1 IRT_NN1 analogue_NN1 to_II a_AT1 standard_JJ reliability_NN1 coefficient_NN1 )_) ranged_VVD from_II 0.91_MC to_II 0.96_MC across_II waves_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, the_AT transgression_NN1 may_VM be_VBI particularly_RR severe_JJ or_CC involve_VV0 an_AT1 important_JJ relationship_NN1 ,_, where_CS there_EX are_VBR greater_JJR expectations_NN2 of_IO ,_, or_CC benefits_NN2 to_TO be_VBI gained_VVN from_II ,_, repair_NN1 and_CC reconciliation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Neither_RR reported_VVN experience_NN1 as_CSA participants_NN2 in_II experiments_NN2 nor_CC number_NN1 of_IO semesters_NN2 as_CSA students_NN2 seemed_VVD to_TO affect_VVI the_AT tendency_NN1 to_TO accept_VVI less_DAR money_NN1 instead_II21 of_II22 more_DAR ._. 
</s>
<s>
Only_RR one_MC1 study_NN1 looked_VVN at_II biased_JJ leader-rated_NN1 LMX_NP1 effects_NN2 on_II counterproductive_JJ performance_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
PSM_NP1 is_VBZ commonly_RR criticized_VVN because_CS it_PPH1 can_VM be_VBI difficult_JJ to_TO find_VVI matches_NN2 for_IF some_DD subjects_NN2 in_II the_AT treatment_NN1 group_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS empirical_JJ research_NN1 into_II this_DD1 area_NN1 is_VBZ still_RR in_II its_APPGE infancy_NN1 ,_, it_PPH1 seems_VVZ likely_JJ that_CST many_DA2 anorexics_NN2 experience_VV0 spontaneous_JJ mental_JJ imagery_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 fat_JJ body_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Coping_VVG with_IW ADHD_NN1 in_II adulthood_NN1 can_VM be_VBI cognitively_RR demanding_VVG as_RG considerable_JJ mental_JJ effort_NN1 is_VBZ required_VVN to_TO ignore_VVI environmental_JJ distractors_NN2 ,_, sustain_VV0 attention_NN1 ,_, control_VV0 impulsive_JJ urges_NN2 ,_, and_CC manage_VV0 internal_JJ restlessness_NN1 (_( Barkley_NP1 ,_, 2014_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Against_II this_DD1 background_NN1 ,_, ongoing_JJ studies_NN2 in_II our_APPGE lab_NN1 are_VBR currently_RR employing_VVG an_AT1 ERP-task_JJ to_TO examine_VVI speech_NN1 segmentation_NN1 in_II younger_JJR infants_NN2 in_II greater_JJR detail_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_II such_DA ,_, the_AT preliminary_JJ findings_NN2 relating_VVG to_II an_AT1 instruction_NN1 to_TO concentrate_VVI on_II the_AT less_RGR intimidating_JJ teddy_NN1 bear_NN1 (_( or_CC similar_JJ )_) should_VM be_VBI extended_VVN ._. 
</s>
<s>
Weber_NP1 ,_, Brewer_NP1 ,_, Semmler_NP1 ,_, Keast_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Wells_NP1 ,_, 2004_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, further_JJR research_NN1 is_VBZ needed_VVN to_TO investigate_VVI the_AT impact_NN1 of_IO established_JJ nonsuggestive_JJ interview_NN1 protocols_NN2 on_II memory_NN1 reporting_VVG in_II rape_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II culture_NN1 as_CSA in_II biology_NN1 ,_, the_AT accumulation_NN1 of_IO adaptive_JJ changes_NN2 across_II many_DA2 generations_NN2 occurs_VVZ only_RR when_CS transmission_NN1 is_VBZ sufficiently_RR faithful_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT corresponding_JJ first-target_JJ accuracies_NN2 for_IF the_AT older_JJR adults_NN2 were_VBDR 54.1_MC ,_, 71.5_MC ,_, and_CC 73.1_MC %_NNU ._. 
</s>
<s>
Offenderbased_JJ findings_NN2 indicating_VVG the_AT "_" perfect_JJ "_" burglary_NN1 target_NN1 have_VH0 been_VBN supported_VVN by_II numerous_JJ studies_NN2 in_II which_DDQ the_AT features_NN2 of_IO burgled_JJ versus_II nonburgled_JJ properties_NN2 are_VBR compared_VVN ,_, the_AT most_RGT innovative_JJ using_VVG data_NN from_II Google_NP1 Street_NNL1 View_NN1 (_( Langton_NP1 &;_NULL Steenbeek_NP1 ,_, 2017_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS the_AT processes_NN2 by_II which_DDQ perceivers_VVZ '_NULL beliefs_NN2 become_VV0 valid_JJ are_VBR different_JJ for_IF self-fulfilling_JJ prophecies_NN2 and_CC accuracy_NN1 ,_, the_AT criteria_NN2 for_IF establishing_VVG their_APPGE validity_NN1 must_VM be_VBI identical_JJ ._. 
</s>
<s>
Despite_II our_APPGE hypothesis_NN1 ,_, neither_RR individuals_NN2 '_NULL D_ZZ1 nor_CC residualised_JJ D_ZZ1 (_( i.e._REX after_II controlling_VVG for_IF shared_JJ DoPL_NN1 influences_NN2 )_) significantly_RR predicted_VVD their_APPGE proportion_NN1 given_VVN in_II the_AT neutral_JJ condition_NN1 but_CCB did_VDD after_CS money_NN1 had_VHD been_VBN withheld_VVN from_II them_PPHO2 (_( i.e._REX in_II the_AT arousal_NN1 condition_NN1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II residential_JJ courses_NN2 ,_, spiritual_JJ care_NN1 faculty_NN1 have_VH0 many_DA2 opportunities_NN2 to_TO '_NULL walk_VVI the_AT talk_NN1 '_NULL by_II modeling_VVG intercultural_JJ care_NN1 in_II the_AT ways_NN2 they_PPHS2 teach_VV0 ,_, write_VV0 ,_, and_CC interact_VV0 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, SES_NP2 factors_NN2 have_VH0 been_VBN associated_VVN with_IW hippocampal_JJ size_NN1 both_RR in_II children_NN2 (_( Hanson_NP1 ,_, Chandra_NP1 ,_, Wolfe_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Pollak_NP1 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Jednoróg_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Noble_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012b_FO )_) and_CC adults_NN2 (_( Noble_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012a_FO ;_; Staff_VV0 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 possible_JJ explanation_NN1 for_IF our_APPGE findings_NN2 is_VBZ that_CST followers_NN2 are_VBR closer_JJR to_TO key_VVI external_JJ actors_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 customers_NN2 and_CC suppliers_NN2 (_( Ketokivi_NP1 &;_NULL Casta?er_NP1 ,_, 2004_MC ,_, p._NN1 341_MC )_) ,_, and_CC can_VM articulate_VVI change_NN1 from_II their_APPGE perspective_NN1 ,_, first_MD to_II each_PPX221 other_PPX222 ,_, and_CC then_RT to_II leaders_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Researchers_NN2 have_VH0 examined_VVN a_AT1 number_NN1 of_IO selfpunishment_NN1 behaviours_NN2 that_CST are_VBR relatively_RR simple_JJ to_TO produce_VVI in_II the_AT laboratory_NN1 ,_, including_II denial_NN1 of_IO pleasure_NN1 (_( Nelissen_NP1 &;_NULL Zeelenberg_NP1 ,_, 2009_MC )_) ,_, giving_VVG up_RP one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 money_NN1 (_( Ohtsubo_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Tanaka_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2015_MC ;_; Watanabe_NP1 &;_NULL Ohtsubo_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ,_, and_CC willingness_NN1 for_IF or_CC infliction_NN1 of_IO physical_JJ pain_NN1 (_( Bastian_JJ et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; van_NP1 Bunderen_NP1 &;_NULL Bastian_JJ ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Inbar_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Nelissen_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
As_CSA in_II the_AT bystander-stressed_JJ female_JJ experiments_NN2 described_VVN above_RL ,_, behavioral_JJ development_NN1 was_VBDZ delayed_VVN by_II a_AT1 day_NNT1 in_II neonates_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 then_RT viewed_VVD a_AT1 realistic_JJ online_JJ store_NN1 webpage_VV0 that_CST indicated_VVD a_AT1 retail_JJ price_NN1 of_IO $799.00_NNU ,_, a_AT1 price_NN1 discount_NN1 of_IO 15%_NNU ,_, selling_NN1 price_NN1 of_IO $679_NNU ,_, as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 a_AT1 picture_NN1 and_CC description_NN1 of_IO the_AT massage_NN1 chair_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
That_REX21 is_REX22 ,_, for_IF each_DD1 scale_NN1 ,_, there_EX was_VBDZ a_AT1 pattern_NN1 of_IO decreasing_JJ correlations_NN2 mirroring_VVG the_AT increasing_JJ distance_NN1 of_IO the_AT scales_NN2 on_II the_AT circumplex_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 results_NN2 conflict_VV0 with_IW findings_NN2 from_II Chang_NP1 et_RA21 al_RA22 ._. 
</s>
<s>
(_( 2016_MC )_) that_CST suggest_VV0 that_DD1 smoking_NN1 makes_VVZ people_NN happy_JJ in_II a_AT1 sample_NN1 of_IO five_MC countries_NN2 using_VVG country-level_JJ data_NN on_II happiness_NN1 and_CC per_JJ21 capita_JJ22 cigarette_NN1 consumption_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
More_RGR specifically_RR ,_, 90%_NNU of_IO all_DB participants_NN2 in_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 and_CC 86%_NNU of_IO all_DB participants_NN2 in_II Experiment_NN1 2_MC produced_VVD motion_NN1 event_NN1 gestures_NN2 (_( including_II Singleton_NP1 gestures_NN2 )_) while_CS using_VVG the_AT specified_JJ sentence_NN1 structure_NN1 in_II more_DAR than_CSN half_DB of_IO the_AT trials_NN2 (_( M=78%_FO of_IO trials_NN2 ,_, Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ;_; M=79%_FO of_IO trials_NN2 in_II Experiment_NN1 2_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT question_NN1 then_RT arises_VVZ as_II21 to_II22 the_AT exact_JJ nature_NN1 of_IO the_AT information_NN1 that_CST is_VBZ being_VBG acquired_VVN from_II a_AT1 large_JJ cell_NN1 and_CC transferred_VVN to_II the_AT standard_JJ cell_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Inattentional_JJ blindness_NN1 is_VBZ influenced_VVN by_II the_AT attentional_JJ demands_NN2 of_IO the_AT primary_JJ task_NN1 (_( Cartwright-Finch_NP1 &;_NULL Lavie_NP1 ,_, 2007_MC ;_; Most_DAT et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2001_MC ;_; Simons_NP &;_NULL Chabris_NP1 ,_, 1999_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Second_MD ,_, we_PPIS2 show_VV0 that_CST deteriorated_VVD phantom_JJ hand_NN1 motor_NN1 control_NN1 (_( i.e._REX ,_, slower_JJR response_NN1 times_NNT2 )_) positively_RR associated_VVN with_IW the_AT strength_NN1 of_IO cortical_JJ sensorimotor_NN1 phantom_NN1 hand_NN1 representation_NN1 ,_, suggesting_VVG that_CST deteriorated_VVD phantom_JJ hand_NN1 motor_NN1 control_NN1 may_VM be_VBI rooted_VVN in_II aberrant_JJ cortical_JJ representation_NN1 of_IO the_AT phantom_JJ hand_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Background_NN1 noise_NN1 may_VM have_VHI a_AT1 disruptive_JJ effect_NN1 on_II the_AT perception_NN1 of_IO voice_NN1 identity_NN1 ;_; it_PPH1 impairs_VVZ speech_NN1 perception_NN1 (_( Mattys_NP1 ,_, Davis_NP1 ,_, Bradlow_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL Scott_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC )_) and_CC masks_NN2 informative_JJ cues_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 pitch_NN1 (_( Qin_NP1 &;_NULL Oxenham_NP1 ,_, 2003_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT Bureau_NN1 obtained_VVD adolescent_JJ assent_NN1 and_CC parental_JJ consent_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Importantly_RR ,_, these_DD2 two_MC scores_NN2 represent_VV0 different_JJ aspects_NN2 of_IO autobiographical_JJ memory_NN1 recall_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
There_EX was_VBDZ no_AT difference_NN1 in_II21 β_NULL between_II22 the_AT task_NN1 conditions_NN2 ,_, F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 42_MC )_) =_FO 1.10_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .299_MC ,_, p2_FO =_FO .026_MC ,_, or_CC hallucination-proneness_JJ groups_NN2 ,_, F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 42_MC )_) =_FO .017_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .896_MC ,_, p2_FO <_FO .001_MC ,_, and_CC no_AT significant_JJ interaction_NN1 between_II task_NN1 condition_NN1 (_( Perceived/Imagined_JJ )_) and_CC hallucination-proneness_NN1 (_( high/low_RR )_) :_: F_ZZ1 (_( 1_MC1 ,_, 42_MC )_) =_FO .073_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .788_MC ,_, p2_FO =_FO .002_MC ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT same_DA item_NN1 used_VVN in_II Study_NN1 1_MC1 was_VBDZ used_VVN to_TO assess_VVI power_NN1 manipulation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Dunn_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 tests_NN2 revealed_VVD that_CST this_DD1 group_NN1 was_VBDZ significantly_RR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO respond_VVI affirmatively_RR to_II the_AT target_NN1 at_II Time_NNT1 3_MC compared_VVN with_IW Time_NNT1 1_MC1 (_( z_ZZ1 =_FO 2.674_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .008_MC ,_, r_ZZ1 =_FO .311_MC )_) but_CCB did_VDD not_XX a_AT1 show_NN1 significant_JJ difference_NN1 between_II Time_NNT1 1_MC1 and_CC Time_NNT1 2_MC (_( z_ZZ1 =_FO 0.988_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .323_MC ,_, r_ZZ1 =_FO .115_MC )_) or_CC between_II Time_NNT1 2_MC and_CC Time_NNT1 3_MC (_( z_ZZ1 =_FO 1.686_MC ,_, p_ZZ1 =_FO .092_MC ,_, r_ZZ1 =_FO .196_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, researchers_NN2 often_RR make_VV0 a_AT1 distinction_NN1 among_II cases_NN2 with_IW DIF_NP1 on_II different_JJ parts_NN2 of_IO the_AT model_NN1 parameters_NN2 ,_, such_II21 as_II22 on_II thresholds_NN2 ,_, loadings_NN2 ,_, or_CC the_AT uniqueness_NN1 variances_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
What_DDQ are_VBR the_AT precursors_NN2 to_II the_AT effects_NN2 reported_VVN here_RL ?_? 
</s>
<s>
They_PPHS2 found_VVD that_CST high_JJ hallucination-prone_JJ individuals_NN2 were_VBDR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO misattribute_VVI self-generated_JJ words_NN2 as_CSA having_VHG been_VBN spoken_VVN by_II the_AT experimenter_NN1 than_CSN those_DD2 in_II the_AT low_JJ hallucination-prone_JJ group_NN1 ,_, whereas_CS there_EX was_VBDZ no_AT difference_NN1 between_II the_AT groups_NN2 in_II other_JJ errors_NN2 ,_, or_CC in_II recognition_NN1 memory_NN1 for_IF previously_RR presented_VVN words_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Unlike_JJ descriptive_JJ norms_NN2 ,_, injunctive_JJ norms_NN2 correspond_VV0 to_II others_NN2 '_NULL perceived_VVD expectations_NN2 regarding_II a_AT1 given_JJ action_NN1 (_( Matthies_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
At_II the_AT same_DA time_NNT1 ,_, none_PN of_IO these_DD2 studies_NN2 controlled_VVD the_AT emotional_JJ stimuli_NN2 for_IF content_NN1 ,_, with_IW often_RR various_JJ ratios_NN2 of_IO social_JJ and_CC nonsocial_JJ stimuli_NN2 across_II different_JJ valence_NN1 categories_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT present_JJ crisis_NN1 is_VBZ a_AT1 response_NN1 to_II real_JJ ,_, identified_VVN failures_NN2 in_II the_AT publication_NN1 system_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Weighted_JJ leastsquares_NN2 means_NN and_CC variances_NN2 adjusted_VVN (_( WLSMV_NP1 )_) estimator_NN1 produces_VVZ probit_NN1 coefficients_NN2 for_IF categorical_JJ outcomes_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Explanations_NN2 for_IF this_DD1 relationship_NN1 highlight_VV0 the_AT implications_NN2 of_IO D-A_NN1 fit_JJ for_IF the_AT rewards_NN2 that_CST individuals_NN2 receive_VV0 on_II the_AT job_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT goal_NN1 in_II the_AT second_MD phase_NN1 of_IO the_AT analysis_NN1 was_VBDZ to_TO identify_VVI the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO certain_JJ inmate_NN1 characteristics_NN2 differentiating_VVG group_NN1 membership_NN1 across_II developmental_JJ inmate_NN1 profiles_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Although_CS much_DA1 of_IO expert_NN1 decision_NN1 making_NN1 is_VBZ beneath_II conscious_JJ awareness_NN1 ,_, consciousness_NN1 is_VBZ construed_VVN as_II a_AT1 continuum_NN1 rather_II21 than_II22 as_II an_AT1 allornothing_JJ phenomenon_NN1 ,_, which_DDQ is_VBZ in_II31 line_II32 with_II33 contemporary_JJ cognitivepsychological_JJ explanations_NN2 (_( Morin_NP1 ,_, 2006_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Indeed_RR ,_, these_DD2 retrieved_JJ stereotypes_NN2 can_VM be_VBI conscious_JJ or_CC unconscious_JJ (_( Greenwald_NP1 &;_NULL Banaji_NP1 ,_, 1995_MC )_) ,_, and_CC not_XX susceptible_JJ to_II contextual_JJ information_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Zeng_VV0 and_CC Greenfield_NP1 (_( 2015_MC )_) extended_VVD this_DD1 analysis_NN1 of_IO ecological_JJ influence_NN1 on_II social_JJ change_NN1 and_CC showed_VVD that_CST in_II China_NP1 economic_JJ development_NN1 ,_, urbanisation_NN1 and_CC enrollment_NN1 in_II higher_JJR education_NN1 led_VVN to_II an_AT1 increase_NN1 in_II the_AT usage_NN1 of_IO words_NN2 indexing_VVG individualistic_JJ values_NN2 and_CC a_AT1 decrease_NN1 in_II the_AT usage_NN1 of_IO words_NN2 indexing_VVG collectivistic_JJ values_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
When_RRQ subjects_NN2 earn_VV0 the_AT money_NN1 at_II stake_NN1 ,_, the_AT modal_JJ response_NN1 ceases_VVZ to_TO be_VBI an_AT1 equal_JJ split_NN1 ,_, as_CSA proposals_NN2 anchor_VV0 around_RP comparative_JJ earnings_NN2 and_CC these_DD2 proposals_NN2 are_VBR statistically_RR different_JJ from_II those_DD2 observed_VVN in_II the_AT other_JJ treatments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT findings_NN2 highlight_VV0 the_AT importance_NN1 of_IO (_( symbolic_JJ )_) motivations_NN2 ,_, values_NN2 and_CC personality_NN1 traits_NN2 for_IF mobilizing_VVG individual_JJ young_JJ consumers_NN2 for_IF more_RGR societal_JJ collective_JJ change_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interviewers_NN2 '_NULL attempts_VVZ to_TO adjust_VVI their_APPGE evaluations_NN2 of_IO applicants_NN2 they_PPHS2 perceive_VV0 to_TO use_VVI deceptive_JJ IM_NN1 may_VM fail_VVI because_CS they_PPHS2 can_VM not_XX correctly_RR identify_VVI when_RRQ applicants_NN2 actually_RR engage_VV0 in_II various_JJ IM_NN1 tactics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Thus_RR ,_, it_PPH1 is_VBZ essential_JJ to_TO identify_VVI factors_NN2 that_CST affect_VV0 victims_NN2 '_NULL decisions_NN2 to_TO report_VVI ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT initial_JJ cohort_NN1 consisted_VVN of_IO 14,541_MC pregnancies_NN2 ,_, with_IW 13,988_MC children_NN2 still_RR alive_JJ one_MC1 year_NNT1 later_RRR (_( 52%_NNU males_NN2 and_CC 48%_NNU females_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Additionally_RR ,_, any_DD threshold_NN1 at_II SOA300_FO ,_, due_II21 to_II22 separation_NN1 of_IO targets_NN2 and_CC response_NN1 prompts_VVZ into_II separate_JJ stimuli_NN2 ,_, was_VBDZ expected_VVN to_TO become_VVI mainly_RR apparent_JJ in_II the_AT S_ZZ1 cluster_VV0 because_CS the_AT stimulus-related_JJ components_NN2 that_CST would_VM possibly_RR get_VVI separated_JJ would_VM be_VBI time-locked_JJ to_II onsets_NN2 of_IO the_AT stimuli_NN2 rather_II21 than_II22 to_II response_NN1 times_NNT2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
For_REX21 example_REX22 ,_, Houkamau_NP1 and_CC Sibley_NP1 (_( 2010_MC )_) showed_VVD that_CST a_AT1 dimension_NN1 indexing_VVG the_AT perceived_JJ relevance_NN1 of_IO historical_JJ injustice_NN1 to_II contemporary_JJ Mori_NP1 ,_, and_CC the_AT willingness_NN1 to_TO engage_VVI in_II political_JJ action_NN1 to_TO advance_VVI Mori_NP1 interests_NN2 ,_, was_VBDZ more_RGR strongly_RR linked_VVN to_II ethnic-identity_JJ centrality_NN1 than_CSN other_JJ dimensions_NN2 such_II21 as_II22 cultural_JJ efficacy_NN1 or_CC spirituality_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Another_DD1 recent_JJ work_NN1 involving_VVG adolescents_NN2 found_VVD that_CST emotional_JJ clarity_NN1 and_CC emotional_JJ repair_NN1 were_VBDR directly_RR and_CC indirectly_RR linked_VVN to_II life_NN1 satisfaction_NN1 ,_, with_IW self-esteem_NN1 as_II a_AT1 partial_JJ mediator_NN1 (_( Rey_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II the_AT fourth_MD step_NN1 ,_, we_PPIS2 entered_VVD parents_NN2 '_NULL skill_NN1 in_II recognizing_VVG children_NN2 '_NULL s_ZZ1 emotions_NN2 and_CC child_NN1 expressive_JJ clarity_NN1 as_II a_AT1 control_NN1 for_IF the_AT potential_JJ confound_NN1 that_CST some_DD children_NN2 may_VM be_VBI easier_JJR to_TO judge_VVI than_CSN others_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 identified_VVN being_VBG Republican_NN1 (_( 128_MC )_) ,_, Democrat_NN1 (_( 78_MC )_) ,_, independent_JJ (_( 43_MC )_) ,_, or_CC "_" other_JJ "_" (_( 22_MC )_) ,_, and_CC one_MC1 participant_NN1 did_VDD not_XX report_VVI political_JJ affiliation_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II a_AT1 description_NN1 of_IO music_NN1 lessons_NN2 in_II Bali_NP1 ,_, McPhee_NP1 (_( 1969_MC )_) explains_VVZ that_CST a_AT1 music_NN1 teacher_NN1 simply_RR plays_VVZ music_NN1 for_IF his_APPGE students_NN2 without_IW modification_NN1 ,_, and_CC expects_VVZ that_CST the_AT students_NN2 will_VM learn_VVI as_II a_AT1 result_NN1 of_IO their_APPGE unique_JJ access_NN1 to_II his_APPGE playing_VVG ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, the_AT association_NN1 between_II callous-unemotional_JJ traits_NN2 and_CC affective_JJ morality_NN1 judgments_NN2 as_II31 well_II32 as_II33 the_AT lack_NN1 of_IO a_AT1 relationship_NN1 with_IW cognitive_JJ morality_NN1 judgments_NN2 is_VBZ also_RR highly_RR related_VVN to_II the_AT cumulative_JJ evidence_NN1 on_II the_AT association_NN1 between_II callous-unemotional_JJ traits_NN2 and_CC empathy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Analyses_NN2 were_VBDR conducted_VVN using_VVG mixed-effect_JJ models_NN2 (_( Baayen_NP1 ,_, 2008_MC )_) with_IW the_AT lme4_FO package_NN1 in_II R_ZZ1 version_NN1 3.2.5_MC (_( R_ZZ1 Development_NN1 Core_NN1 Team_NN1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT best_JJT goodness_NN1 of_IO fit_NN1 was_VBDZ found_VVN in_II a_AT1 two_MC factor_NN1 model_NN1 (_( RMSEA_NP1 =_FO 0.02_MC ,_, CFI_NP1 =_FO 0.99_MC and_CC TLI_NP1 =_FO 0.99_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Atherosclerotic_JJ stenosis_NN1 of_IO the_AT internal_JJ carotid_JJ artery_NN1 is_VBZ known_VVN as_II a_AT1 major_JJ risk_NN1 factor_NN1 for_IF disabling_JJ stroke_NN1 or_CC death_NN1 leading_VVG to_II enormous_JJ socioeconomic_JJ problems_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Heuristics_NN2 may_VM also_RR decrease_VVI accuracy_NN1 but_CCB yield_VV0 reductions_NN2 in_II time_NNT1 and_CC effort_NN1 that_CST justify_VV0 their_APPGE use_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
I_PPIS1 mean_VV0 ,_, come_VV0 on_RP ,_, everybody_PN1 knows_VVZ what_DDQ '_NULL s_ZZ1 going_VVG on_RP there_RL ._. 
</s>
<s>
Especially_RR shame_NN1 appeared_VVD to_TO become_VVI significant_JJ after_II experience_NN1 of_IO childhood_NN1 abuse_NN1 and_CC neglect_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
A_AT1 more_RGR reasonable_JJ explanation_NN1 for_IF participants_NN2 '_NULL forgetfulness_NN1 may_VM be_VBI something_PN1 akin_JJ to_II inattentional_JJ blindness_NN1 (_( Mack_NP1 &;_NULL Rock_NN1 ,_, 1998_MC )_) ,_, where_CS participants_NN2 '_NULL attentional_JJ focus_NN1 on_II the_AT filler_NN1 task_NN1 during_II the_AT confederate_NN1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 absence_NN1 made_VVD them_PPHO2 functionally_RR blind_JJ to_II the_AT latter_DA '_NULL s_ZZ1 exit_NN1 and_CC return_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
The_AT results_NN2 extend_VV0 previous_JJ findings_NN2 with_IW learners_NN2 of_IO English_NN1 to_II children_NN2 who_PNQS are_VBR learning_VVG a_AT1 more_RGR transparent_JJ orthography_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Hence_RR ,_, these_DD2 studies_NN2 could_VM not_XX disentangle_VVI the_AT effect_NN1 of_IO lexicalisation_NN1 patterns_NN2 (_( satellite-framed_NN1 vs._II verb-framed_NN1 )_) and_CC that_DD1 of_IO planning_VVG units_NN2 (_( one_MC1 planning_NN1 unit_NN1 vs._II two_MC planning_NN1 units_NN2 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_II this_DD1 short_JJ scale_NN1 ,_, four_MC items_NN2 addressed_VVD the_AT students_NN2 '_NULL consistency_NN1 of_IO interests_NN2 (_( CI_NP1 :_: e.g._REX ,_, "_" I_PPIS1 often_RR set_VV0 a_AT1 goal_NN1 but_CCB later_RRR choose_VV0 to_TO pursue_VVI a_AT1 different_JJ one_PN1 "_" )_) ,_, and_CC four_MC items_NN2 tapped_VVD the_AT students_NN2 '_NULL perseverance_NN1 of_IO effort_NN1 (_( PE_NN1 :_: e.g._REX ,_, "_" I_PPIS1 am_VBM diligent_JJ "_" )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Several_DA2 studies_NN2 show_VV0 that_CST when_CS self-discrepancies_NN2 arise_VV0 in_II31 terms_II32 of_II33 one_MC1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 affiliation_NN1 with_IW others_NN2 ,_, people_NN are_VBR more_RGR likely_JJ to_TO buy_VVI products_NN2 that_CST signal_NN1 status_NN1 or_CC membership_NN1 in_II the_AT social_JJ group_NN1 (_( Dommer_NP1 &;_NULL Swaminathan_NP1 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Duclos_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2013_MC ;_; Lee_NP1 &;_NULL Shrum_NP1 ,_, 2012_MC ;_; Mead_NN1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2011_MC ;_; Wan_VV0 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2014_MC ;_; Wang_NP1 et_RA21 al._RA22 ,_, 2012_MC )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
Other_JJ hyperlexics_NN2 from_II Turner_NP1 '_NULL s_ZZ1 syndrome_NN1 (_( Temple_NP1 &;_NULL Carney_NP1 ,_, 1996_MC )_) and_CC Dysmorphic_JJ Facial_JJ characteristics_NN2 (_( Santoro_NP1 ,_, Healey_NP1 ,_, &;_NULL McGinley_NP1 ,_, 2016_MC )_) groups_NN2 also_RR did_VDD not_XX show_VVI ASD_NN1 characteristics_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
All_DB patients_NN2 were_VBDR treated_VVN with_IW antiepileptic_JJ drugs_NN2 ,_, while_CS four_MC of_IO the_AT patients_NN2 with_IW autoimmune_NN1 LE_FW were_VBDR undergoing_VVG immunological_JJ treatment_NN1 with_IW Azathioprine_NP1 or_CC Methylprednisolone_NP1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Individualism_NN1 is_VBZ characteristic_JJ of_IO modern_JJ Western_JJ countries_NN2 with_IW developed_JJ market_NN1 economy_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
These_DD2 were_VBDR identical_JJ to_II Experiment_NN1 1_MC1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Evidence_NN1 that_CST status_NN1 comparisons_NN2 activate_VV0 particular_JJ motive(s)_NN2 ,_, which_DDQ in_II turn_NN1 predict_VV0 impression_NN1 management_NN1 ,_, would_VM further_RRR explain_VVI diverging_JJ strategies_NN2 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Participants_NN2 with_IW test_NN1 scores_NN2 below_RG 7_MC points_NN2 were_VBDR assigned_VVN to_II the_AT group_NN1 with_IW low_JJ mathematical_JJ expertise_NN1 (_( LoEx_NP1 )_) ._. 
</s>
<s>
This_DD1 work_NN1 was_VBDZ supported_VVN by_II the_AT Funda??o_NP1 para_NN1 a_AT1 Ciência_NP1 e_ZZ1 Tecnologia_NP1 ,_, IP_NP1 (_( FCT_NP1 )_) and_CC the_AT POCH/FSE_NN1 under_II Grant_NP1 SFRH/BD/85110/2012_FU ._. 
</s>
<s>
In_RR21 addition_RR22 ,_, Magda_NP1 performed_VVD particularly_RR slowly_RR on_II this_DD1 task_NN1 ._. 
</s>
<s>
Interpersonal_JJ conflict_NN1 was_VBDZ assessed_VVN by_II a_AT1 combination_NN1 of_IO in_RR21 situ_RR22 random_JJ assessments_NN2 and_CC retrospective_JJ morning_NNT1 assessments_NN2 ._. 
</s>
