Method_NN1 
Participants_NN2 
The_AT0 participants_NN2 were_VBD 142_CRD undergraduate_NN1 studentsFootnote_NN1 1_CRD from_PRP a_AT0 U.S._NP0 Midwestern_AJ0 University_NN1 ._SENT (_PUL This_DT0 sample_NN1 was_VBD after_PRP eliminating_VVG one_CRD pair_NN0 because_CJS they_PNP reported_VVD being_VBG acquainted_VVN ._SENT )_PUR Most_DT0 of_PRF the_AT0 students_NN2 were_VBD from_PRP a_AT0 psychology_NN1 participant_NN1 pool_NN1 ,_PUN although_CJS a_AT0 smaller_AJC proportion_NN1 were_VBD volunteers_NN2 from_PRP a_AT0 sociology_NN1 class_NN1 who_PNQ elected_VVD to_TO0 use_VVI this_DT0 research_NN1 opportunity_NN1 as_PRP a_AT0 way_NN1 to_TO0 earn_VVI extra_AJ0 credit_NN1 (_PUL among_PRP other_AJ0 options_NN2 )_PUR ._SENT Pairs_NN2 of_PRF participants_NN2 were_VBD scheduled_VVN at_PRP the_AT0 same_DT0 time_NN1 ,_PUN based_VVN on_PRP their_DPS availability_NN1 and_CJC that_DT0 of_PRF the_AT0 student_NN1 experimenters_NN2 ._SENT If_CJS both_DT0 participants_NN2 did_VDD not_XX0 arrive_VVI during_PRP their_DPS scheduled_AJ0 time_NN1 ,_PUN the_AT0 one_PNI who_PNQ did_VDD arrive_VVI was_VBD assigned_VVN another_DT0 research_NN1 activity_NN1 ._SENT Data_NN0 collection_NN1 occurred_VVN over_PRP three_CRD semesters_NN2 in_PRP order_NN1 to_TO0 obtain_VVI what_DTQ was_VBD determined_VVN to_TO0 be_VBI an_AT0 adequate_AJ0 sample_NN1 size_NN1 ._SENT 
Due_AJ0 to_PRP the_AT0 gender_NN1 imbalance_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 participant_NN1 pool_NN1 (_PUL and_CJC the_AT0 larger_AJC university_NN1 )_PUR ,_PUN a_AT0 large_AJ0 majority_NN1 (_PUL n_ZZ0 =_NP0 109_CRD ;_PUN 76.9_CRD %_NN0 )_PUR were_VBD women_NN2 ._SENT The_AT0 mean_AJ0 age_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 participants_NN2 was_VBD 19.82_CRD (_PUL SD_NP0 =_NP0 2.88_CRD )_PUR ._SENT A_AT0 majority_NN1 (_PUL 68.3_CRD %_NN0 )_PUR of_PRF the_AT0 participants_NN2 identified_VVD themselves_PNX as_PRP White_NP0 ;_PUN 9.9_CRD %_NN0 were_VBD Black_AJ0 ,_PUN 10.6_CRD %_NN0 were_VBD Hispanic_AJ0 /_PUN Latino_NN1 ,_PUN and_CJC 4.2_CRD %_NN0 were_VBD Asian_AJ0 (_PUL a_AT0 few_DT0 did_VDD not_XX0 provide_VVI their_DPS race_NN1 or_CJC indicated_VVD mixed_AJ0 race_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT Of_PRF the_AT0 71_CRD dyads_NN2 ,_PUN 39_CRD were_VBD female-female_AJ0 ,_PUN 28_CRD were_VBD male-female_AJ0 ,_PUN one_PNI was_VBD male-male_AJ0 ,_PUN and_CJC 3_CRD had_VHD an_AT0 unknown_AJ0 sex_NN1 composition_NN1 because_CJS one_CRD member_NN1 had_VHD not_XX0 responded_VVN to_PRP the_AT0 gender_NN1 question_NN1 ._SENT 
The_AT0 Pre-Interaction_AJ0 Procedure_NN1 
Participants_NN2 who_PNQ signed_VVD up_AVP for_PRP the_AT0 study_NN1 were_VBD scheduled_VVN in_PRP pairs_NN2 (_PUL based_VVN on_PRP availability_NN1 )_PUR for_PRP the_AT0 experimental_AJ0 session_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 participants_NN2 in_PRP each_DT0 pair_NN0 arrived_VVD to_PRP different_AJ0 rooms_NN2 in_PRP a_AT0 university_NN1 building_NN1 and_CJC were_VBD greeted_VVN by_PRP their_DPS own_DT0 experimenter_NN1 ,_PUN who_PNQ provided_VVD directions_NN2 to_PRP the_AT0 study_NN1 ._SENT Then_AV0 ,_PUN the_AT0 experimenters_NN2 arranged_VVN for_PRP some_DT0 of_PRF the_AT0 dyads_NN2 ,_PUN randomly_AV0 determined_VVN ,_PUN to_TO0 greet_VVI each_DT0 other_NN1 over_PRP Skype_NP0 (_PUL video_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT All_DT0 participants_NN2 then_AV0 responded_VVN to_PRP a_AT0 rating_NN1 form_NN1 that_CJT included_VVD several_DT0 dichotomous_AJ0 items_NN2 requesting_VVG self-descriptive_AJ0 information_NN1 such_DT0 as_PRP traits_NN2 ,_PUN preferences_NN2 ,_PUN and_CJC interests_NN2 (_PUL this_DT0 information_NN1 was_VBD used_VVN for_PRP the_AT0 manipulation_NN1 of_PRF similarity_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT After_PRP responding_VVG to_PRP the_AT0 form_NN1 ,_PUN the_AT0 participants_NN2 completed_VVD an_AT0 online_AJ0 survey_NN1 that_CJT included_VVD background_NN1 questions_NN2 (_PUL gender_NN1 ,_PUN age_NN1 ,_PUN race_NN1 ,_PUN etc._AV0 )_PUR and_CJC two_CRD questions_NN2 that_CJT assessed_VVD their_DPS expectations_NN2 for_PRP the_AT0 upcoming_AJ0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT Then_AV0 ,_PUN the_AT0 participants_NN2 received_VVD the_AT0 rating_NN1 sheet_NN1 ostensibly_AV0 completed_VVN by_PRP their_DPS interaction_NN1 partner_NN1 (_PUL located_VVN in_PRP another_DT0 room_NN1 )_PUR but_CJC ,_PUN in_PRP fact_NN1 ,_PUN was_VBD filled_VVN in_AVP by_PRP the_AT0 experimenter_NN1 (_PUL for_PRP a_AT0 similar_AJ0 method_NN1 ,_PUN see_VVB Sprecher_NP0 ,_PUN 2019_CRD )_PUR ._SENT After_PRP viewing_VVG the_AT0 bogus_AJ0 rating_NN1 sheet_NN1 (_PUL which_DTQ was_VBD manipulated_VVN to_TO0 be_VBI similar_AJ0 or_CJC dissimilar_AJ0 to_PRP their_DPS own_DT0 answers_NN2 )_PUR ,_PUN the_AT0 participants_NN2 completed_VVD a_AT0 brief_AJ0 online_AJ0 survey_NN1 that_CJT asked_VVD their_DPS expectations_NN2 for_PRP the_AT0 interaction_NN1 (_PUL including_PRP a_AT0 question_NN1 on_PRP expectations_NN2 for_PRP liking_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT 
The_AT0 Interaction_NN1 Procedure_NN1 
After_PRP the_AT0 above_AV0 preliminary_AJ0 steps_NN2 ,_PUN the_AT0 pairs_NN2 engaged_VVN in_PRP a_AT0 15-min_AJ0 getting-acquainted_AJ0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 dyad_NN1 members_NN2 were_VBD in_PRP two_CRD different_AJ0 rooms_NN2 ,_PUN and_CJC the_AT0 interaction_NN1 occurred_VVN over_PRP video-mediated_AJ0 communication_NN1 (_PUL Skype_NP0 )_PUR ._SENT They_PNP engaged_VVD in_PRP a_AT0 structured_AJ0 self-disclosure_NN1 task_NN1 ,_PUN which_DTQ consisted_VVD of_PRF a_AT0 combination_NN1 of_PRF items_NN2 from_PRP Aron_NP0 et_NP0 al._NP0 's_POS (_PUL 1997_CRD )_PUR Closeness-Generating_AJ0 Inventory_NN1 and_CJC Sedikides_NN2 ,_PUN Campbell_NP0 ,_PUN Reeder_NP0 ,_PUN and_CJC Elliot_NP0 's_POS (_PUL 1999_CRD )_PUR Relationship_NN1 Closeness_NN1 Induction_NN1 Task_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 questions_NN2 in_PRP the_AT0 self-disclosure_NN1 task_NN1 were_VBD presented_VVN in_PRP three_CRD sets_NN2 (_PUL of_PRF 5_CRD min_NN0 each_DT0 )_PUR ,_PUN with_PRP each_DT0 set_NN1 increasing_VVG in_PRP intimacy_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 question_NN1 list_NN1 was_VBD presented_VVN to_PRP each_DT0 member_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 pair_NN0 ,_PUN and_CJC the_AT0 dyad_NN1 members_NN2 were_VBD directed_VVN to_TO0 take_VVI turns_NN2 being_VBG the_AT0 first_ORD to_TO0 ask_VVI a_AT0 question_NN1 ._SENT More_AV0 specifically_AV0 ,_PUN they_PNP were_VBD told_VVN that_CJT one_CRD of_PRF them_PNP would_VM0 ask_VVI a_AT0 question_NN1 ,_PUN the_AT0 other_NN1 would_VM0 disclose_VVI ,_PUN and_CJC then_AV0 the_AT0 other_NN1 would_VM0 ask_VVI the_AT0 same_DT0 question_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 first_ORD ._SENT The_AT0 experimenters_NN2 entered_VVD the_AT0 rooms_NN2 to_TO0 indicate_VVI when_CJS their_DPS participants_NN2 should_VM0 go_VVI on_AVP to_PRP the_AT0 next_ORD set_NN1 of_PRF questions_NN2 ._SENT When_CJS the_AT0 session_NN1 ended_VVD ,_PUN the_AT0 experimenters_NN2 had_VHD their_DPS participant_NN1 complete_VVI a_AT0 final_AJ0 online_AJ0 reaction_NN1 ._SENT 
The_AT0 Self-Descriptive_AJ0 Rating_NN1 Form_NN1 and_CJC the_AT0 Similarity_NN1 /_PUN Dissimilarity_NN1 Manipulation_NN1 
The_AT0 self-descriptive_AJ0 form_NN1 included_VVD 17_CRD items_NN2 that_CJT asked_VVD the_AT0 participants_NN2 to_TO0 describe_VVI themselves_PNX ,_PUN followed_VVN with_PRP dichotomous_AJ0 responses_NN2 ._SENT Some_DT0 of_PRF the_AT0 items_NN2 began_VVD with_PRP "_PUQ Which_DTQ do_VDB you_PNP prefer_VVI ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL e.g._AV0 ,_PUN reality_NN1 show_NN1 vs._PRP sitcom_NN1 ;_PUN coffee_NN1 vs._PRP tea_NN1 ;_PUN big_AJ0 party_NN1 vs._PRP romantic_AJ0 dinner_NN1 for_PRP 2_CRD )_PUR ._SENT Other_AJ0 items_NN2 began_VVD ,_PUN "_PUQ Which_DTQ best_AV0 describes_VVZ you_PNP ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL e.g._AV0 ,_PUN introvert_AJ0 vs._PRP extrovert_AJ0 ;_PUN sloppy_AJ0 vs._PRP neat_AJ0 freak_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT After_PRP the_AT0 participant_NN1 completed_VVD the_AT0 form_NN1 ,_PUN the_AT0 experimenter_NN1 picked_VVD it_PNP up_AVP and_CJC explained_VVD that_CJT they_PNP would_VM0 return_VVI with_PRP the_AT0 other_AJ0 participant_NN1 's_POS completed_AJ0 form_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 two_CRD experimenters_NN2 met_VVN in_PRP the_AT0 hallway_NN1 and_CJC fabricated_VVD a_AT0 new_AJ0 form_NN1 for_PRP each_DT0 of_PRF the_AT0 dyad_NN1 members_NN2 ._SENT Depending_VVG on_PRP the_AT0 condition_NN1 to_PRP which_DTQ their_DPS participant_NN1 was_VBD randomly_AV0 assigned_VVN ,_PUN the_AT0 experimenters_NN2 prepared_VVD each_DT0 bogus_AJ0 version_NN1 so_AV0 that_CJT the_AT0 pair_NN0 had_VHD 3_CRD of_PRF the_AT0 17_CRD items_NN2 similar_AJ0 or_CJC dissimilar_AJ0 ._SENT Which_DTQ items_NN2 were_VBD selected_VVN for_PRP the_AT0 similar_AJ0 responses_NN2 (_PUL in_PRP the_AT0 dissimilarity_NN1 condition_NN1 )_PUR and_CJC for_PRP the_AT0 dissimilar_AJ0 responses_NN2 (_PUL in_PRP the_AT0 similarity_NN1 condition_NN1 )_PUR were_VBD randomly_AV0 determined_VVN ._SENT 
Measures_NN2 of_PRF Dependent_AJ0 Variables_NN2 
Expectations_NN2 Prior_AJ0 to_PRP Receiving_VVG Bogus_AJ0 Information_NN1 (_PUL and_CJC Also_AV0 Prior_AJ0 to_PRP the_AT0 Interaction_NN1 )_PUR 
At_PRP the_AT0 end_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 initial_AJ0 online_AJ0 survey_NN1 ,_PUN two_CRD items_NN2 asked_VVD the_AT0 participants_NN2 about_PRP their_DPS expectations_NN2 for_PRP the_AT0 upcoming_AJ0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT One_CRD question_NN1 asked_VVD how_AVQ eager_AJ0 they_PNP were_VBD to_TO0 interact_VVI with_PRP the_AT0 other_NN1 and_CJC the_AT0 other_AJ0 question_NN1 asked_VVN about_PRP expectations_NN2 for_PRP enjoying_VVG the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT Each_DT0 question_NN1 was_VBD followed_VVN by_PRP a_AT0 1_CRD (_PUL not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 )_PUR to_PRP 7_CRD (_PUL a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR response_NN1 scale_NN1 ._SENT 
Expectations_NN2 after_PRP Receiving_VVG Bogus_AJ0 Information_NN1 (_PUL but_CJC Prior_AJ0 to_PRP the_AT0 Interaction_NN1 )_PUR 
Participants_NN2 completed_VVD a_AT0 second_ORD (_PUL brief_AJ0 )_PUR online_AJ0 survey_NN1 after_CJS they_PNP received_VVD the_AT0 bogus_AJ0 information_NN1 about_PRP the_AT0 other_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 participants_NN2 were_VBD asked_VVN a_AT0 second_ORD time_NN1 how_AVQ eager_AJ0 they_PNP were_VBD to_TO0 interact_VVI with_PRP the_AT0 other_NN1 and_CJC the_AT0 degree_NN1 to_PRP which_DTQ they_PNP thought_VVD they_PNP would_VM0 enjoy_VVI the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT They_PNP were_VBD also_AV0 asked_VVN how_AVQ much_DT0 they_PNP expected_VVD that_CJT they_PNP would_VM0 like_VVI the_AT0 other_AJ0 (_PUL "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 do_VDB you_PNP think_VVI you_PNP will_VM0 like_VVI the_AT0 other_AJ0 person_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ )_PUR ._SENT Each_DT0 question_NN1 was_VBD followed_VVN by_PRP a_AT0 1_CRD (_PUL not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 )_PUR to_PRP 7_CRD (_PUL a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR response_NN1 scale_NN1 ._SENT Participants_NN2 were_VBD also_AV0 asked_VVN two_CRD questions_NN2 about_PRP their_DPS perception_NN1 of_PRF similarity_NN1 with_PRP the_AT0 other_AJ0 person_NN1 :_PUN "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 do_VDB you_PNP think_VVI you_PNP have_VHB in_PRP common_NN1 with_PRP the_AT0 other_AJ0 person_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL 1_CRD =_NP0 nothing_PNI or_CJC almost_AV0 nothing_PNI ,_PUN 7_CRD =_NP0 a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR and_CJC "_PUQ How_AVQ similar_AJ0 do_VDB you_PNP think_VVI you_PNP and_CJC the_AT0 Other_AJ0 are_VBB likely_AJ0 to_TO0 be_VBI ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL 1_CRD =_NN1 not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 ,_PUN 7_CRD =_NP0 a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT A_AT0 composite_NN1 was_VBD created_VVN based_VVN on_PRP the_AT0 mean_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 two_CRD similarity_NN1 items_NN2 ,_PUN which_DTQ had_VHD a_AT0 Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 of_PRF .88_CRD ._SENT 
Liking_NN1 and_CJC Other_AJ0 Affiliative_AJ0 Outcomes_NN2 after_PRP the_AT0 Interaction_NN1 
After_PRP the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ,_PUN the_AT0 participants_NN2 completed_VVD an_AT0 online_AJ0 survey_NN1 that_CJT included_VVD several_DT0 measures_NN2 of_PRF reactions_NN2 to_PRP the_AT0 partner_NN1 and_CJC to_PRP the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT 
Liking_NN1 
Liking_NN1 was_VBD assessed_VVN with_PRP three_CRD items_NN2 ._SENT One_CRD item_NN1 was_VBD :_PUN "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 did_VDD you_PNP like_VVI the_AT0 other_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL 1_CRD =_NN1 not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 ,_PUN 7_CRD =_NP0 a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT The_AT0 other_AJ0 two_CRD items_NN2 were_VBD adapted_VVN from_PRP Byrne_NP0 's_POS (_PUL 1971_CRD )_PUR Interpersonal_AJ0 Judgment_NN1 Scale_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 first_ORD Byrne_NP0 item_NN1 asked_VVD about_PRP general_AJ0 feelings_NN2 (_PUL 1_CRD =_NN1 I_PNP feel_VVB that_CJT I_PNP would_VM0 probably_AV0 like_VVI this_DT0 person_NN1 very_AV0 much_AV0 ;_PUN to_PRP 7_CRD =_NN1 I_PNP feel_VVB that_CJT I_PNP would_VM0 probably_AV0 dislike_VVI this_DT0 person_NN1 very_AV0 much_AV0 )_PUR ._SENT The_AT0 second_ORD Byrne_NP0 item_NN1 asked_VVD participants_NN2 about_PRP their_DPS desire_NN1 to_TO0 work_VVI with_PRP the_AT0 person_NN1 again_AV0 in_PRP an_AT0 experiment_NN1 (_PUL 1_CRD =_NN1 I_PNP believe_VVB that_CJT I_PNP would_VM0 very_AV0 much_AV0 dislike_VVB working_VVG with_PRP this_DT0 person_NN1 in_PRP an_AT0 experiment_NN1 ,_PUN 7_CRD =_NN1 I_PNP believe_VVB that_CJT I_PNP would_VM0 very_AV0 much_AV0 enjoy_VVB working_VVG with_PRP this_DT0 person_NN1 in_PRP an_AT0 experiment_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT The_AT0 composite_AJ0 score_NN1 for_PRP liking_NN1 was_VBD based_VVN on_PRP the_AT0 mean_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 three_CRD liking_NN1 items_NN2 ,_PUN after_PRP the_AT0 first_ORD Byrne_NP0 item_NN1 was_VBD recoded_VVN ._SENT Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 for_PRP a_AT0 composite_AJ0 score_NN1 was_VBD .78_CRD ._SENT 
Perceptions_NN2 of_PRF being_VBG liked_VVN 
Participants_NN2 were_VBD asked_VVN ,_PUN "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 do_VDB you_PNP think_VVI the_AT0 Other_AJ0 liked_VVD you_PNP ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL 1_CRD =_NN1 Not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 ;_PUN to_PRP 7_CRD =_NN1 A_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT 
Closeness_NN1 
Closeness_NN1 to_PRP the_AT0 other_NN1 was_VBD assessed_VVN with_PRP two_CRD items_NN2 ._SENT First_ORD ,_PUN a_AT0 general_AJ0 question_NN1 on_PRP closeness_NN1 was_VBD asked_VVN :_PUN "_PUQ How_AVQ close_AV0 do_VDB you_PNP feel_VVI toward_PRP the_AT0 Other_AJ0 ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL 1_CRD =_NN1 Not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 ,_PUN 7_CRD =_NP0 A_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT In_PRP addition_NN1 ,_PUN participants_NN2 responded_VVN to_PRP the_AT0 Inclusion_NN1 of_PRF Other_AJ0 in_PRP the_AT0 Self_NN1 (_PUL IOS_NP0 )_PUR Venn_NN1 diagram_NN1 (_PUL Aron_NP0 ,_PUN Aron_NP0 ,_PUN &_NP0 Smollan_NP0 ,_PUN 1992_CRD )_PUR ._SENT This_DT0 is_VBZ a_AT0 simple_AJ0 ,_PUN validated_AJ0 ,_PUN and_CJC commonly_AV0 used_VM0 measure_VVI to_TO0 assess_VVI closeness_NN1 ,_PUN and_CJC required_VVD the_AT0 participants_NN2 to_TO0 select_VVI the_AT0 pair_NN0 of_PRF circles_NN2 (_PUL which_DTQ overlapped_VVD to_PRP almost_AV0 no_AT0 degree_NN1 to_PRP overlapping_VVG almost_AV0 completely_AV0 )_PUR that_CJT best_AV0 represented_VVD their_DPS interaction_NN1 (_PUL for_PRP examples_NN2 of_PRF use_NN1 ,_PUN see_VVB Aron_NP0 et_NP0 al._NP0 ,_PUN 1992_CRD ;_PUN Fraley_NP0 &_NP0 Aron_NP0 ,_PUN 2004_CRD )_PUR ._SENT Because_CJS the_AT0 Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 for_PRP the_AT0 2-item_AJ0 closeness_NN1 index_NN1 was_VBD low_AJ0 (_PUL .55_CRD )_PUR the_AT0 two_CRD items_NN2 are_VBB analyzed_VVN separately_AV0 ._SENT 
Enjoyment_NN1 of_PRF interaction_NN1 
Enjoyment_NN1 of_PRF interaction_NN1 was_VBD assessed_VVN with_PRP three_CRD items_NN2 :_PUN (_PUL 1_CRD )_PUR "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 did_VDD you_PNP enjoy_VVI the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ (_PUL 2_CRD )_PUR "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 did_VDD you_PNP and_CJC the_AT0 other_AJ0 laugh_NN1 during_PRP the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ?_SENT ;_PUN "_PUQ and_CJC (_PUL 3_CRD )_PUR "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 fun_NN1 was_VBD the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ Each_DT0 item_NN1 was_VBD followed_VVN by_PRP a_AT0 7-point_AJ0 response_NN1 scale_NN1 with_PRP the_AT0 anchors_NN2 ,_PUN 1_CRD =_NN1 not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 ,_PUN 4_CRD =_NN2 somewhat_AV0 ;_PUN to_PRP 7_CRD =_NN1 a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 composite_AJ0 score_NN1 was_VBD represented_VVN by_PRP the_AT0 mean_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 three_CRD items_NN2 ,_PUN and_CJC Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 for_PRP the_AT0 composite_AJ0 score_NN1 was_VBD .80_CRD ._SENT 
Perceived_AJ0 responsiveness_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 other_NN1 
Participants_NN2 were_VBD presented_VVN with_PRP four_CRD items_NN2 that_CJT assessed_VVD the_AT0 degree_NN1 to_PRP which_DTQ they_PNP perceived_VVD their_DPS partner_NN1 to_TO0 be_VBI responsive_AJ0 in_PRP the_AT0 situation_NN1 ._SENT Three_CRD of_PRF the_AT0 items_NN2 were_VBD from_PRP Reis_NP0 ,_PUN Maniaci_NP0 ,_PUN Caprariello_NP0 ,_PUN Eastwick_NP0 ,_PUN and_CJC Finkel_NP0 's_POS (_PUL 2011_CRD )_PUR Responsiveness_NN1 scale_NN1 and_CJC were_VBD :_PUN "_PUQ The_AT0 Other_AJ0 seemed_VVD to_TO0 really_AV0 listen_VVI to_PRP me_PNP ,_PUN "_PUQ "_PUQ The_AT0 Other_AJ0 seemed_VVD interested_AJ0 in_PRP what_DTQ I_PNP am_VBB thinking_VVG and_CJC feeling_VVG ,_PUN "_PUQ and_CJC "_PUQ The_AT0 Other_AJ0 was_VBD "_PUQ on_PRP the_AT0 same_DT0 wavelength_NN1 "_PUQ with_PRP me_PNP ._SENT "_PUQ A_AT0 fourth_ORD item_NN1 was_VBD written_VVN by_PRP the_AT0 author_NN1 and_CJC has_VHZ been_VBN used_VVN in_PRP prior_AJ0 social_AJ0 interaction_NN1 studies_NN2 (_PUL Sprecher_NP0 &_NP0 Treger_NP0 ,_PUN 2015_CRD )_PUR ,_PUN and_CJC was_VBD the_AT0 item_NN1 ,_PUN "_PUQ The_AT0 other_NN1 was_VBD responsive_AJ0 to_PRP my_DPS questions_NN2 /_PUN answers_NN2 ._SENT "_PUQ Each_DT0 item_NN1 was_VBD followed_VVN by_PRP a_AT0 7-point_AJ0 response_NN1 scale_NN1 ,_PUN with_PRP options_NN2 anchored_VVN in_PRP the_AT0 following_AJ0 ways_NN2 :_PUN 1_CRD =_NN1 Not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 true_AJ0 in_PRP this_DT0 situation_NN1 ;_PUN 4_CRD =_NN1 Somewhat_AV0 true_AJ0 in_PRP this_DT0 situation_NN1 ;_PUN and_CJC 7_CRD =_NN2 Very_AV0 true_AJ0 in_PRP this_DT0 situation_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 mean_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 items_NN2 represented_VVD the_AT0 composite_AJ0 score_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 four_CRD items_NN2 ,_PUN and_CJC Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 was_VBD .92_CRD ._SENT 
Desire_VVB for_PRP further_AJC interaction_NN1 
Desire_VVB for_PRP more_DT0 interaction_NN1 was_VBD assessed_VVN with_PRP two_CRD similarly_AV0 worded_AJ0 questions_NN2 (_PUL that_DT0 appeared_VVD in_PRP different_AJ0 sections_NN2 of_PRF the_AT0 post-interaction_AJ0 survey_NN1 )_PUR :_PUN "_PUQ How_AVQ much_DT0 do_VDB you_PNP wish_VVI you_PNP could_VM0 have_VHI more_DT0 interaction_NN1 in_PRP the_AT0 future_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ and_CJC "_PUQ How_AVQ much_AV0 would_VM0 you_PNP like_VVI to_TO0 spend_VVI time_NN1 with_PRP the_AT0 Other_AJ0 again_AV0 in_PRP the_AT0 future_NN1 ?_SENT "_PUQ The_AT0 response_NN1 options_NN2 ranged_VVN from_PRP 1_CRD =_NN1 not_XX0 at_PRP all_DT0 ;_PUN to_PRP 7_CRD =_NN1 a_AT0 great_AJ0 deal_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 mean_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 two_CRD items_NN2 represented_VVD a_AT0 total_AJ0 composite_AJ0 score_NN1 and_CJC had_VHD a_AT0 Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 of_PRF .86_CRD ._SENT 
Perceived_AJ0 similarity_NN1 
Perceived_AJ0 similarity_NN1 was_VBD assessed_VVN with_PRP the_AT0 same_DT0 two_CRD items_NN2 used_VVN in_PRP the_AT0 pre-interaction_AJ0 survey_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 mean_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 items_NN2 represented_VVD the_AT0 total_AJ0 composite_NN1 ,_PUN and_CJC Cronbach_NP0 's_POS alpha_NN1 was_VBD .91_CRD ._SENT 
Results_NN2 
Overview_NN1 to_PRP the_AT0 Analyses_NN2 
First_ORD ,_PUN intraclass_AJ0 correlations_NN2 were_VBD calculated_VVN for_PRP the_AT0 dyad_NN1 members_NN2 '_POS scores_NN2 on_PRP the_AT0 expectation_NN1 measures_NN2 ._SENT The_AT0 correlations_NN2 were_VBD non-significant_AJ0 for_PRP all_DT0 of_PRF the_AT0 expectation_NN1 measures_NN2 ,_PUN and_CJC ranged_VVD from_PRP −.13_CRD to_PRP .05_CRD ._SENT Not_XX0 surprising_AJ0 ,_PUN however_AV0 ,_PUN the_AT0 intraclass_AJ0 correlation_NN1 was_VBD significant_AJ0 for_PRP the_AT0 manipulation_NN1 check_NN1 of_PRF perceived_AJ0 similarity_NN1 (_PUL .76_CRD ,_PUN p_ZZ0 =_NN1 .001_CRD )_PUR ,_PUN as_CJS both_DT0 members_NN2 of_PRF the_AT0 dyads_NN2 had_VHD received_VVN the_AT0 same_DT0 bogus_AJ0 information_NN1 (_PUL either_AV0 similarity_NN1 or_CJC dissimilarity_NN1 )_PUR ._SENT Because_CJS the_AT0 intraclass_AJ0 correlations_NN2 were_VBD nonsignificant_AJ0 for_PRP the_AT0 measures_NN2 of_PRF expectations_NN2 ,_PUN the_AT0 analyses_NN2 were_VBD conducted_VVN at_PRP the_AT0 individual_AJ0 level_NN1 ._SENT The_AT0 dyadic_AJ0 non-independence_NN1 in_PRP similarity_NN1 was_VBD handled_VVN by_PRP controlling_VVG for_PRP the_AT0 similarity_NN1 manipulation_NN1 in_PRP the_AT0 analyses_NN2 that_CJT examined_VVD the_AT0 associations_NN2 of_PRF participants_NN2 '_POS own_DT0 expectations_NN2 with_PRP their_DPS partner_NN1 's_POS reactions_NN2 ._SENT 
Pre-Interaction_AJ0 Expectations_NN2 before_PRP Receipt_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 Bogus_AJ0 Similarity_NN1 /_PUN Dissimilarity_NN1 Information_NN1 
Participants_NN2 scored_VVD in_PRP the_AT0 moderate_AJ0 range_NN1 on_PRP the_AT0 two_CRD expectations_NN2 questions_NN2 that_CJT appeared_VVD at_PRP the_AT0 end_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 preliminary_AJ0 online_AJ0 survey_NN1 that_CJT was_VBD administered_VVN before_PRP the_AT0 bogus_AJ0 similarity_NN1 information_NN1 was_VBD shared_VVN ._SENT On_PRP average_NN1 ,_PUN participants_NN2 were_VBD somewhat_AV0 eager_AJ0 to_TO0 interact_VVI with_PRP the_AT0 stranger_NN1 (_PUL M_NP0 =_NP0 3.90_CRD ,_PUN SD_NP0 =_NP0 1.24_CRD )_PUR and_CJC also_AV0 believed_VVD they_PNP would_VM0 enjoy_VVI the_AT0 interaction_NN1 a_AT0 moderate_AJ0 amount_NN1 (_PUL M_NP0 =_NP0 4.26_CRD ,_PUN SD_NP0 =_NP0 1.06_CRD )_PUR ._SENT 
To_PRP address_NN1 RQ1_CRD ,_PUN participants_NN2 who_PNQ had_VHD a_AT0 skype_AJ0 greeting_NN1 with_PRP their_DPS interaction_NN1 partner_NN1 (_PUL n_ZZ0 =_NN1 56_CRD )_PUR were_VBD compared_VVN with_PRP the_AT0 participants_NN2 who_PNQ did_VDD not_XX0 have_VHI a_AT0 skype_NN1 greeting_NN1 (_PUL n_ZZ0 =_NN1 86_CRD )_PUR ,_PUN on_PRP the_AT0 two_CRD expectation_NN1 items_NN2 ._SENT The_AT0 second_ORD group_NN1 consisted_VVD of_PRF both_DT0 participants_NN2 who_PNQ were_VBD randomly_AV0 assigned_VVN to_PRP the_AT0 no-Skype_AJ0 greeting_NN1 group_NN1 (_PUL n_ZZ0 =_NN1 74_CRD )_PUR and_CJC participants_NN2 who_PNQ were_VBD assigned_VVN to_PRP the_AT0 Skype_NP0 greeting_NN1 but_CJC the_AT0 technology_NN1 did_VDD not_XX0 work_VVI (_PUL n_ZZ0 =_NN1 12_CRD )_PUR ._SENT Participants_NN2 who_PNQ engaged_VVD in_PRP the_AT0 Skype_NP0 greeting_NN1 reported_VVN being_VBG more_AV0 eager_AJ0 to_TO0 interact_VVI (_PUL M_CRD =_NP0 4.16_CRD ,_PUN SD_NP0 =_NP0 1.24_CRD )_PUR than_CJS participants_NN2 who_PNQ did_VDD not_XX0 have_VHI the_AT0 Skype_NP0 greeting_NN1 (_PUL M_NP0 =_NP0 3.73_CRD ,_PUN SD_NP0 =_NP0 1.21_CRD ;_PUN t_ZZ0 [_PUL 138_CRD ]_PUR =_NP0 2.05_CRD ,_PUN p_ZZ0 =_NP0 .04_CRD ;_PUN d_ZZ0 =_NN1 .35_CRD )_PUR ._SENT However_AV0 ,_PUN there_EX0 was_VBD not_XX0 a_AT0 significant_AJ0 difference_NN1 in_PRP expectations_NN2 of_PRF enjoying_VVG the_AT0 interaction_NN1 as_PRP a_AT0 function_NN1 of_PRF having_VHG a_AT0 Skype_NP0 greeting_NN1 (_PUL M_NP0 =_NP0 4.44_CRD ,_PUN SD_NP0 =_NP0 .92_CRD )_PUR versus_PRP not_XX0 having_VHG one_PNI (_PUL M_CRD =_NP0 4.14_CRD ,_PUN SD_NP0 =_NP0 1.13_CRD )_PUR ,_PUN t_ZZ0 [_PUL 138_CRD ]_PUR =_NP0 1.63_CRD ,_PUN p_ZZ0 =_NP0 .106_CRD ,_PUN d_ZZ0 =_NN1 .29_CRD )_PUR ._SENT 
Pre-Interaction_AJ0 Expectations_NN2 after_PRP Receipt_NN1 of_PRF the_AT0 Bogus_AJ0 Similarity_NN1 /_PUN Dissimilarity_NN1 Information_NN1 
As_CJS noted_VVN earlier_AV0 ,_PUN after_PRP the_AT0 participants_NN2 received_VVD the_AT0 information_NN1 ostensibly_AV0 completed_VVN by_PRP their_DPS interaction_NN1 partner_NN1 (_PUL who_PNQ was_VBD presented_VVN to_TO0 be_VBI similar_AJ0 or_CJC dissimilar_AJ0 to_PRP them_PNP )_PUR ,_PUN they_PNP completed_VVD a_AT0 second_ORD online_AJ0 survey_NN1 ._SENT This_DT0 online_AJ0 survey_NN1 asked_VVD them_PNP once_AV0 again_AV0 how_AVQ eager_AJ0 they_PNP were_VBD to_TO0 interact_VVI with_PRP the_AT0 other_AJ0 and_CJC how_AVQ much_AV0 they_PNP thought_VVD they_PNP would_VM0 enjoy_VVI the_AT0 interaction_NN1 ._SENT 
