当前位置: HOME >> Corpus Linguistics News >> 正文

《语料库与话语研究》配套网页 Corpora and Discourse Studies Companion Website

发布者:xujiajin [发表时间]:2019-06-28 [来源]: [浏览次数]:

许家金,2019,《语料库与话语研究》。北京:外语教学与研究出版社。

第一章:概述

第二章:话语研究的语料库方法

第三章:语料库与话语建构研究

第四章:语料库与立场评价研究

第五章:语料库与衔接连贯研究

第六章:语料库与语域变异研究

第七章:体裁短语学与词典研编

第八章:语料库话语研究展望

勘误(errata)

  • 第24页:Martin评价系统原始框架中engagement(介入)系统包含monogloss和heterogloss两类。monogloss下又包括entertain、proclaim和disclaim子系统;heterogloss下的子系统包括contract、expand。我的这个表格源自我本人所做的叙事话语评价研究案例,因此只保留了monogloss下面的子系统,忽略了hetergloss下面的子系,未能完整呈现Martin的原始理论框架。谢谢李涛老师指出该问题(参见:Martin, J. & P. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 该书38页有评价资源框架图。)

  • 第45页:McEnery & Baker(2017)应改为钱毓芳、McEnery(2017),即:钱毓芳、Tony McEnery,2017,A corpus-based discourse study of Chinese medicine in UK national newspapers,《外语教学与研究》(1):73-84。谢谢钱毓芳老师指出该问题。

  • 第21页及193页:近日读Ken Hyland(2005)Metadiscourse一书,其中指出metadiscourse一词由Harris于1959年创制。其所引文献为Harris, Z. 1959. The Transformational Model of Language Structure. Anthropological Linguistics 1:1.27-29. 然而,通读该文,并检索metadiscourse,未见踪影。Hyland是metadiscourse研究大家,我担心自己在《语料库与话语研究》一书21页所引用的文献出处有误。现在看来,我的引文出处无误。Hyland的引文不实。不过,我在193页参考文献出的页码出现了错误,应为937-950。查证后发现我提供给出版社的Word文档中的相关文献条目为:Harris, Z. 1959. Linguistic transformations for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, Volume 2. Washington,  D.C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council. 937-950。不知后来为何被改成了458-471。

  • 195页:应删去文献(1)。

  • (1) Jiang, F. & K. Hyland. forthcoming. Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics 4: 1-25

  • (2) Jiang, F. & K. Hyland. 2018. Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics 39(4): 508-531.

  • 欢迎纠错,邮件请发至bfsucrg AT sina DOT com

说明

  • 本书并未花篇幅介绍Alan Partington等人提出“语料库辅助的话语研究”(Corpus-assited Dicourse Studies, CADS),因为就各方面而言,我并没有看出CADS与基于语料库的话语研究(corpus-based discourse studies)有何不同。

Last updated: 2 October, 2019.

**********

A synopsis ofCorpora and Discourse Studies

Xu, Jiajin. (2019).Corpora and Discourse Studies. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Both corpus linguistics and discourse studies prioritise the study of meaning based on naturalistic language data as one of their primary research objectives. For one thing, the synergy of corpus linguistics and discourse studies equips the latter with ample language evidence and robust analytical tools. Furthermore, the co-selection of linguistic features and co-variance between linguistic features and contextual variables offer theoretical insights into discourse analysis.

This book presents a thorough overview of the well-established as well as flourishing field of discourse studies. The first two chapters discuss the fundamental concepts and method(ologie)s of corpus and discourse studies respectively. Chapters three to seven explore in detail with case studies the topics of discursive construction, linguistic evaluation, cohesion and coherence, register variation, and genre-informed dictionary compilation. The types of language data covered in the book include media discourse, interlanguage, translational texts, business discourse and academic discourse. Chapter eight concludes with predictions about the future directions of corpus-based discourse studies.

This volume is presumably the first monograph in Chinese dealing with corpus-based discourse studies in a systematic manner. Moreover, unlike similar titles published in English by international publishers which are overwhelmingly characterised by critical discourse analysis, this book strikes a balance between corpus-based discourse organisation and socially relevant issues.